Navigated cup implantation in hip arthroplasty

Varying Complication Rates and Increased Costs in Technology-Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty Versus Conventional Instrumentation in 1,372,300 Primary Total Hips

BACKGROUND

The use of technology allows surgeons increased precision in component positioning in total hip arthroplasty (THA). The objective of this study was to compare (1) perioperative complications and (2) resource utilizations between robotic-assisted (RA) and computer-navigated (CN) versus conventional instrumenttaion (CI) THA.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed using a large national database to identify patients undergoing unilateral, primary elective THA from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2019 using RA, CN, or CI. There were 1,372,300 total patients identified and included RA (29,735), CN (28,480), and CI (1,314,085) THA. Demographics, complications, lengths of stay, dispositions, and costs were compared between the cohorts. Binary logistic regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

The use of RA THA led to lower rates of intraoperative fracture (0.22% versus 0.39%), delirium (0.1% versus 0.2%), postoperative anemia (14.4% versus 16.7%), higher myocardial infarction (0.13% versus 0.08%), renal failure (1.7% versus 1.6%), blood transfusion (2.0% versus 1.9%), and wound dehiscence (0.02% versus 0.01%) compared to CI THA. The use of CN led to lower rates of respiratory complication (0.5% versus 0.8%), renal failure (1.1% versus 1.6%), blood transfusion (1.3% versus 1.9%), and pulmonary embolism (0.02% versus 0.1%) compared to CI THA. Total costs were increased in RA ($17,729 versus $15,977) and CN ($22,529 versus $15,977). Lengths of hospital stay were decreased in RA (1.8 versus 1.9 days) and CN (1.7 versus 1.9 days).

CONCLUSIONS

Perioperative complication rates vary in technology-assisted THA, with higher rates in RA THA and lower rates in CN THA, relative to CI THA. Both RA THA and CN THA were associated with more costs, shorter postoperative hospital stays, and higher rates of discharge home compared to CI THA.

Accuracy of cup placement and pelvic motion in total hip arthroplasty in the lateral decubitus position using a new computed tomography-based navigation system with augmented reality technology

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to investigate the accuracy of cup position and assess the changes in pelvic tilt during primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) in the lateral decubitus position using a new computed tomography (CT)-based navigation system with augmented reality (AR) technology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

There were 37 cementless THAs performed using a CT-based navigation system with AR technology in the lateral decubitus position and 63 cementless THAs performed using manual implant techniques in the lateral decubitus position in this retrospective study. Postoperative cup radiographic inclination and anteversion were measured using postoperative CT, and the proportion of hips within Lewinnek's safe zone was analyzed and compared between the two groups. The mean absolute values of navigation error were assessed. Intraoperative pelvic tilt angles were also recorded using navigation system.

RESULTS

The percentage of cups inside Lewinnek's safe zone was 100% in the navigation group and 35% in the control group (p < 0.001). The mean absolute values of navigation error in inclination and anteversion were 2.9° ± 2.1° and 3.3° ± 2.4°, respectively. The mean abduction angle of the pelvis was 5.1° ± 4.8° after placing the patients in the lateral decubitus position and 4.1° ± 6.0° after cup placement. The mean posterior tilt angle was 6.8° ± 5.1° after placing the patients in the lateral decubitus position and 9.3° ± 5.9° after cup placement. The mean internal rotation angle was 14.8° ± 7.4° after cup placement. There were no correlations between the navigation error in inclination or anteversion and the absolute values of changes of the pelvic tilt angle at any phase.

CONCLUSIONS

Although progressive pelvic motion occurred in THA in the lateral decubitus position, especially during cup placement, the CT-based navigation system with AR technology improved cup placement accuracy.

Robotics and Navigation Do Not Affect the Risk of Periprosthetic Joint Infection Following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Analysis

BACKGROUND

The use of computer navigation or robotic assistance during primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) has yielded numerous benefits due to more accurate component positioning. The utilization of these tools is generally associated with longer operative times and also necessitates additional surgical equipment and personnel in the operating room. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of technology assistance on periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after primary THA.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records for 12,726 patients who had undergone primary THA at a single high-volume institution between 2018 and 2021. Patients were stratified by surgical technique (conventional THA, computer-navigated THA [CN-THA], or robotic-assisted THA [RA-THA]) and were matched 1:1 with use of propensity score matching. Univariate and logistic regression analyses were performed to compare the rates of PJI within 90 days postoperatively between the cohorts.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching, there were 4,006 patients in the THA versus RA-THA analysis (2,003 in each group) and 5,288 patients in the THA versus CN-THA analysis (2,644 in each group). CN-THA (p < 0.001) and RA-THA (p < 0.001) were associated with longer operative times compared with conventional THA by 3 and 11 minutes, respectively. The rates of PJI after conventional THA (0.2% to 0.4%) were similar to those after CN-THA (0.4%) and RA-THA (0.4%). On the basis of logistic regression, the development of PJI was not associated with the use of computer navigation (odds ratio [OR], 1.8 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.7 to 5.3]; p = 0.232) or robotic assistance (OR, 0.9 [95% CI, 0.3 to 2.3]; p = 0.808).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite longer operative times associated with the use of computer navigation and robotic assistance, the use of these tools was not associated with an increased risk of PJI within 90 days after surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Registration in the supine position improve the accuracy of cup placement in total hip arthroplasty using a portable navigation system

Portable navigation systems have been developed for use in total hip arthroplasty (THA) in recent years. Although intraoperative registration in the lateral decubitus position or the supine position is need to create the three-dimensional coordinate system, it is not clear which position is appropriate. The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of cup placement in primary THA in the lateral decubitus position using an image-free handheld navigation device with registration in the lateral decubitus or the supine position, and clarify which position is appropriate. This retrospective study included 129 consecutive cementless THAs performed using an image-free handheld navigation device in the lateral decubitus position. Registration in the first 68 hips was performed in the lateral decubitus position and the last 61 hips was performed in the supine position. Postoperative cup radiographic inclination and radiographic anteversion were assessed, and the accuracy was compared between the two groups. The mean absolute errors of the postoperative measured inclination and anteversion from the target angles were 3.9° ± 2.2° and 4.8° ± 3.5° in the lateral group and 2.9° ± 2.7° and 3.2° ± 2.7° in the supine group (p < 0.05). The percentage of cups inside Lewinnek's safe zone was 94% in the lateral group and 95% in the supine group (ns). The mean absolute values of navigation error in inclination and anteversion were 3.1° ± 2.1° and 4.2° ± 2.8° in the lateral group and 2.3° ± 2.0° and 3.1° ± 2.4° in the supine group (p < 0.05 and p < 0.05). Registration in the supine position improved the accuracy of cup insertion compared with the lateral decubitus position in THA using an image-free handheld navigation device in the lateral decubitus position.

Two- and three-dimensional measurements of leg length change using an accelerometer-based portable navigation system in total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was examining the accuracy of accelerometer-based portable navigation systems (HipAlign) when measuring leg length changes using two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) methods.

METHODS

Inclusion criteria were patients ≥ 20 years old with symptomatic hip disease who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) in the supine position using HipAlign between June 2019 and April 2020. The exclusion criteria were patients who underwent THA via a posterior approach. We examined correlations between the leg length change measurement with HipAlign and either 2D or 3D measurement. We performed a multivariate analysis to determine which factors may have influenced the absolute error results.

RESULTS

This study included 34 patients. The absolute error in leg length change between the HipAlign and 3D measurement (4.0 mm) was greater than the HipAlign and 2D measurement (1.7 mm). There were positive correlations between leg length change with HipAlign and 2D and 3D measurements. Male patients had larger errors with 2D measurement. No significant factors were identified for 3D measurement.

CONCLUSION

HipAlign provided acceptable measurement accuracy for leg length changes.

Total Hip Arthroplasty: An Update on Navigation, Robotics, and Contemporary Advancements

While total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains effective for improvement of pain and function in patients with osteoarthritis and avascular necrosis, there remain areas of continued pursuit of excellence, including decreasing rates of dislocation, leg length discrepancy, implant loosening, and infection. This review article covers several bearing surfaces and articulations, computer-assisted navigation and robotic technology, and minimally invasive surgical approaches that have sought to improve such outcomes. Perhaps the most significant improvement to THA implant longevity has been the broad adoption of highly cross-linked polyethylene, with low wear rates. Similarly, navigation and robotic technology has proven to more reproducibly achieve intraoperative component positioning, which has demonstrated clinical benefit with decreased risk of dislocation in a number of studies. Given the projected increase in THA over the coming decades, continued investigation of effective incorporation of technology, soft tissue-sparing approaches, and durable implants is imperative to continued pursuit of improved outcomes in THA.

Spinopelvic Relationship and Its Impact on Total Hip Arthroplasty

The dynamic, complex interaction among the spine, pelvis, and hip is often underappreciated, yet understanding it is vital for both arthroplasty and spinal surgeons. There is an increasing incidence of degenerative hip and spinal pathologies as a result of the ageing population. Furthermore, hip pathology can cause spine pathology and vice versa through “hip-spine” and “spine-hip syndrome.” Consequently, total hip arthroplasty (THA) and spinal fusion surgery, which both affect spinopelvic mobility, are also on the rise. Alteration in spinopelvic motion can affect the orientation of the acetabulum and, therefore, implant positioning in THA, leading to complications such as dislocation, impingement, aseptic loosening, and wear of components. This makes it imperative to assess spinopelvic motion and pelvic tilt prior to patients undergoing THA. In this paper, we explore how the surgeon should proceed to reduce risk of component malalignment, as well as the role of navigation systems in acetabular cup positioning.

Accuracy of a novel accelerometer-based navigation (Naviswiss) for total hip arthroplasty in the supine position

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to determine the accuracy of acetabular cup insertion using a novel accelerometer-based navigation system in total hip arthroplasty (THA).

METHODS

A single-surgeon study was conducted in which 62 prospective patients with navigation and 42 retrospective patients without navigation in a supine position were compared. Absolute values for errors of radiographic inclination and anteversion were calculated. Navigation error was also calculated. Factors that affected absolute value of navigation error in cup alignment were determined.

RESULTS

In the navigation group, mean absolute errors for radiographic inclination and anteversion were 4.1° and 4.3°, respectively. In the control group, mean absolute errors were 6.6° in inclination (p < 0.01) and 5.9° in anteversion (p = 0.04). Mean absolute values of navigation error were 2.8° in inclination and 2.8°in anteversion. Factors affecting navigation errors were not found.

CONCLUSION

This novel accelerometer-based navigation system significantly increased the accuracy of cup placement during THA in the supine position.

The Use of Technology to Achieve the Functional Acetabular Safe Zone in Total Hip Arthroplasty

»

Functional acetabular safe zones based on patient-specific factors during total hip arthroplasty are theorized to result in more optimal component stability than the use of traditional safe zones based on static targets.

»

Preoperative planning that takes into account functional pelvic positions and spinopelvic mobility is increasingly recommended.

»

Computer navigation and robotics can be utilized to help accurately achieve the targeted cup position within the functional safe zone.

»

Each technology platform (imageless and image-based computer navigation and robotics) utilizes a specific referencing method for the pelvis, which influences anteversion and inclination values.

»

The purpose of this article is to summarize how these different systems reconcile differences in pelvic referencing to ensure that the surgeon achieves the targeted functional cup position.

Comparison of the accuracies of computed tomography-based navigation and image-free navigation for acetabular cup insertion in total hip arthroplasty in the lateral decubitus position

Image-free navigation has been proven as reliable as that using computed tomography (CT) in positioning the acetabular cup in total hip arthroplasty (THA), but previous studies rarely included hip dysplasia cases. The purpose of the present study was to determine the accuracies of CT-based navigation and image-free navigation for acetabular cup insertion, including hip dysplasia cases. Sixty-three hips were studied, including 57 with hip dysplasia. The hips were divided into two groups based on the registration point of image-free navigation. In Group I, the ipsilateral anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) and the L5 spinous process were registered in 31 hips. In Group II, bilateral ASIS points were registered in 32 hips. Final component orientation was measured from postoperative CT scans. The accuracy of cup orientation was compared between CT-based and image-free navigation. In Group I, the cup inclination was more accurate with CT-based navigation (1.9°) than with image-free navigation (4.4°, p=.009). Cup anteversion was also more accurate with CT-based navigation (2.9°) than with image-free navigation (7.1°, p<.001). In Group II, the accuracies of cup inclination and anteversion showed no differences between CT-based and image-free navigation. The accuracy of cup positioning was better with CT-based navigation than with image-free navigation when the ipsilateral ASIS and L5 spinous process were digitized. However, accuracy was similar when bilateral ASIS points were digitized.

The accuracy of acetabular cup placement in primary total hip arthroplasty using an image-free navigation system

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative navigation systems have been shown to improve the accuracy of acetabular component insertion in total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of this study was to investigate the accuracy of cup orientation in primary THA using an image-free navigation system.

METHODS

A total of 107 consecutive cementless THAs using an image-free navigation system were performed from February 2017 to March 2020 (the navigation group). As a control group, 77 retrospective consecutive cases who underwent THAs with manual implant-techniques between February 2012 and April 2017 were included. Postoperative cup radiographic inclination and radiographic anteversion relative to the functional pelvic plane were assessed using a 3D-template system after computed tomography (CT) examination.

RESULTS

The mean absolute errors of the postoperative measured angles from the target angles in inclination were 3.4° ± 3.0° in the navigation group and 8.4° ± 6.6° in the control group (p < 0.001). The mean absolute errors in anteversion were 5.1° ± 3.6° in the navigation group and 10.8° ± 6.5° in the control group (p < 0.001). The percentage of cups inside the Lewinnek safe zone was 93% in the navigation group and 44% in the control group (p < 0.001). The mean absolute values of navigation error were 3.3° ± 2.8° in inclination and 5.8° ± 4.9° in anteversion. Among the cases of osteoarthritis, the inclination error was significantly higher in Crowe group 2 to 4 than in Crowe group 1 (5.1° ± 3.5° and 3.0° ± 2.5°, respectively, p < 0.05). The percentage of hips with inclination error over 10° in Crowe group 2 to 4 was significantly higher than in Crowe group 1 (17 and 1%, respectively, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The image-free navigation system improved the accuracy of cup orientation. The accuracy of cup position was less in Crowe group 2 to 4 than in Crowe group 1.

The Use of Computer Navigation in Total Hip Arthroplasty Is Associated with a Reduced Rate of Revision for Dislocation: A Study of 6,912 Navigated THA Procedures from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry

BACKGROUND

The use of computer navigation has been shown to produce more accurate cup positioning when compared with non-navigated total hip arthroplasty (THA), but so far there is only limited evidence to show its effect on clinical outcomes. The present study analyzed data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry to assess the impact of computer navigation on the rates of all-cause revision and revision for dislocation following THA.

METHODS

Data for all non-navigated and navigated primary THAs performed for osteoarthritis in Australia from January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2019, were examined to assess the rate of revision. We analyzed the effects of navigation on rate, reason, and type of revision. Hazard ratios (HRs) from Cox proportional hazard models, adjusted for age, sex, and head size, were utilized. Because of known prosthesis-specific differences in outcomes, we performed a further analysis of the 5 acetabular and femoral component combinations most commonly used with navigation.

RESULTS

Computer navigation was utilized in 6,912 primary THAs for osteoarthritis, with the use of navigation increasing from 1.9% in 2009 to 4.4% of all primary THAs performed in 2019. There was no difference in the rate of all-cause revision between navigated and non-navigated THAs looking at the entire group. There was a lower rate of revision for dislocation in the navigation THA cohort. The cumulative percent revision for dislocation at 10 years was 0.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.2% to 0.6%) for navigated compared with 0.8% (95% CI, 0.8% to 0.9%) for non-navigated THAs (HR adjusted for age, sex, and head size, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.74; p = 0.002). In the 5 component combinations most commonly used with navigation, the rate of all-cause revision was significantly lower when these components were navigated compared with non-navigated. The cumulative percent revision at 10 years for these 5 prostheses combined was 2.4% (95% CI, 1.6% to 3.4%) for navigated compared with 4.2% (95% CI, 4.0% to 4.5%) for non-navigated THAs (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.86; p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that the use of computer navigation was associated with a reduced rate of revision for dislocation following THA. Furthermore, in the component combinations most commonly used with navigation there was also a reduction in the rate of all-cause revision.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The Accuracy of Patient-Specific Instrumentation with Laser Guidance in a Dynamic Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Radiological Evaluation

The functional positioning of components in a total hip arthroplasty (THA) and its relationship with individual lumbopelvic kinematics and a patient’s anatomy are being extensively studied. Patient-specific kinematic planning could be a game-changer; however, it should be accurately delivered intraoperatively. The main purpose of this study was to verify the reliability and accuracy of a patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) and laser-guided technique to replicate preoperative dynamic planning. Thirty-six patients were prospectively enrolled and received dynamic hip preoperative planning based on three functional lateral spinopelvic X-rays and a low dose CT scan. Three-dimensional (3D) printed PSI guides and laser-guided instrumentation were used intraoperatively. The orientation of the components, osteotomy level and change in hip length and offset were measured on postoperative CT scans and compared with the planned preoperative values. The length of surgery was compared with that of a matched group of thirty-six patients who underwent a conventional THA. The mean absolute deviation from the planned inclination and anteversion was 3.9° and 4.4°, respectively. In 92% of cases, both the inclination and anteversion were within +/− 10° of the planned values. Regarding the osteotomy level, offset change and limb length change, the mean deviation was, respectively, 1.6 mm, 2.6 mm and 2 mm. No statistically significant difference was detected when comparing the planned values with the achieved values. The mean surgical time was 71.4 min in the PSI group and 60.4 min in the conventional THA group (p < 0.05). Patient-specific and laser-guided instrumentation is safe and accurately reproduces dynamic planning in terms of the orientation of the components, osteotomy level, leg length and offset. Moreover, the increase in surgical time is negligible.

Improving MiniHip femoral prosthesis positioning using a cross-laser projection system in total hip arthroplasty by an anterolateral supine approach

Background

The authors developed a cross‐laser projection system (CLP) to place a femoral neck‐sparing short stem using the minimally invasive anterolateral supine approach in total hip arthroplasty. This study aimed to verify the utility of CLP.

Methods

Thirty joints were assessed with the MiniHip (Corin). The authors compared femoral component implantation with a patient‐specific femoral osteotomy guide (PSG) for the femoral neck‐cut (PSG group), with the CLP attached to the rasp handle to irradiate the cross‐laser to the target of PSG (CLP group), and without PSG or CLP (control group).

Results

In the CLP group, the positional deviation of anteversion, anterior/posterior tilt and varus/valgus placement of the stem postoperatively were 1.8° ± 0.2°, 2.0° ± 2.0° and 2.0° ± 0.1°, respectively. The positional deviation of anteversion (p < 0.001) and anterior/posterior tilt (p = 0.036) were significantly smaller than those in the other groups.

Conclusions

CLP improves the accuracy of MiniHip femoral prosthesis placement.

Pre- and postoperative offset and femoral neck version measurements and validation using 3D computed tomography in total hip arthroplasty

Background

Restoration of a correct biomechanical situation after total hip arthroplasty is important.

Purpose

To evaluate proximal femoral symmetry of acetabular and femoral offset and femoral neck anteversion pre- and postoperatively in hip arthroplasty by semi-automated 3D-CT and to validate the software measurements by inter- and intraobserver agreement calculations.

Material and Methods

In low-dose CT on 71 patients before and after unilateral total hip arthroplasty, two observers used a digital 3D templating software to measure acetabular offset, true and functional femoral offset, and femoral neck anteversion. Observer agreements were calculated using intraclass correlation. Hip measurements were compared in each patient and between pre- and postoperative measurements.

Results

Preoperatively, acetabular offset (2.4 mm), true (2.2 mm), and functional global offset (2.7 mm) were significantly larger on the osteoarthritic side without side-to-side differences for true and functional femoral offset or femoral neck anteversion. Postoperatively, acetabular offset was significantly smaller on the operated side (2.1 mm) with a concomitantly increased true (2.5 mm) and functional femoral offset (1.5 mm), resulting in symmetric true and functional global offsets. There were no differences in postoperative femoral neck anteversion. Inter- and intraobserver agreements were near-perfect, ranging between 0.92 and 0.98 with narrow confidence intervals (0.77-0.98 to 0.94-0.99).

Conclusion

Acetabular and concomitantly global offset are generally increased in hip osteoarthritis. Postoperative acetabular offset was reduced, and femoral offset increased to maintain global offset. 3D measurements were reproducible with near-perfect observer agreements. 3D data sets should be used for pre- and postoperative measurements in hip arthroplasty.

Accuracy of acetabular cup insertion in an anterolateral supine approach using an accelerometer-based portable navigation system

The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of acetabular cup insertion during total hip arthroplasty (THA) in a supine position using an accelerometer-based portable navigation system. A single-surgeon study was conducted in which 62 prospective patients with navigation and 42 retrospective patients without navigation as historical controls were compared. The patients underwent THA via an anterolateral supine approach. The absolute values of errors of radiographic inclination and anteversion were calculated. The navigation error was also calculated. The factors that affected the absolute values of errors of cup alignment were determined. The mean absolute error of the postoperative CT measurement from the target angle for radiographic inclination was 3.8° in the navigation group and 6.6° in the control group (P < 0.001). The mean absolute error for anteversion was 3.3° in the navigation group and 5.9° in the control group (P < 0.001). The mean absolute values of navigation error were 3.7° ± 2.8° in inclination and 3.0° ± 2.6° in anteversion. Changes in the pelvic tilt angle among preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative were the significant risk factors for the absolute values of navigation error of anteversion relative to the anterior pelvic plane. Other factors affecting the absolute values of errors in the navigation group were not found for radiographic inclination and anteversion. The portable navigation system significantly improved the accuracy of cup inclination and anteversion. Changes in the pelvic tilt were the risk factors for the error of anteversion relative to the anterior pelvic plane.

The etiology of revision total hip arthroplasty: current trends in a retrospective survey of 3450 cases

INTRODUCTION

Over the last years, the design of implants, the surgical approaches, and diagnostic tools changed in primary and revision of total hip arthroplasty. A knowledge of the different causes for revision after total hip arthroplasty is essential to avoid complications and failures. The purpose of this study was to determine trends of the etiology of implant failures over the last years by analyzing indications of revision hip arthroplasty.

METHODS

All the patients who performed revision hip arthroplasties in our institution between 2001 and 2015 were reviewed retrospectively. Patient demographics, the indication for revision surgery as well as the procedure were assessed. Descriptive statistical analyses and association analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Within our collective of 3450 revision hip arthroplasties, a total of 20 different indications were identified and categorized. Overall, 80.8% of the revisions were categorized as aseptic, 19.2% as septic implant failures. Some recently debated diagnoses like low-grade infection showed a high increase in incidence, whereas classic failure mechanisms like polyethylene wear showed a decrease over the time. In addition, the data revealed that cup loosening caused more revision surgeries than stem loosening.

CONCLUSION

This study successfully updated the current knowledge of different failure mechanisms in revision hip arthroplasties. The data proved that cup loosening was the most common failure mechanism in older patients, while in young patients, septic complications showed a high incidence. Probably, due to improved diagnostic tools, the percentage of infection in revision hip arthroplasty increased over the years.

Three-dimensional analysis of acetabular cup orientation and an evaluation of the relationship with pelvic sagittal parameters

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of total hip arthroplasty (THA) on sagittal pelvic parameters and to evaluate the effect of sagittal pelvic parameters on acetabular cup orientation.

METHODS

The study included 86 patients who underwent THA for a diagnosis of unilateral coxarthrosis between 2011 and 2015. Measurements were taken of the preoperative and postoperative acetabular cup inclination (ACI), anteversion, and sagittal pelvic parameters. The effect of THA on sagittal pelvic parameters and the effects of the sagittal pelvic parameters on acetabular cup orientation were investigated.

RESULTS

The sagittal pelvic tilt values calculated were mean 9.7° ± 6.3° (2°; 23°) preoperatively and 11.0° ± 6.1° (2°; 25°) postoperatively. The increase in postoperative pelvic incidence (PI) values was determined to be statistically significant (p < 0.05). The preoperative PI values had no significant effect on ACI, but in cases with high preoperative PI values, a tendency to high anteversion values was determined. The mean inclination values were found to be 40.2° ± 11.0° in the low PI group, 41.7° ± 7.4° in the normal PI group, and 44.1° ± 8.3° in the high PI group. As no increase in inclination values was observed with an increase in PI values, no statistical correlation was determined (p = 0.343). Average of anteversion values in the low PI group was 9.2° ± 13.7°, in the normal PI group 19.3° ± 10.5°, and in the high PI group 21.1° ± 12.5°. The difference between the groups was statistically significant (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Evaluating the results of this study, it can be concluded that varying PI values do affect the acetabular cup anterversion in THA. So, preoperative assessment of PI values is important in preventing postoperative acetabular cup malposition.

Use of smartphone to improve acetabular component positioning in total hip athroplasty: A comparative clinical study

BACKGROUND

The position of the acetabular cup is important to the outcome of total hip athroplasty (THA). We devised an instrument that uses the level indicator application of smartphone together with a mechanical alignment guide to improve the precision of cup placement. This study aims to determine the percentage of acetabular cups positioned in the Lewinnek safe zone comparing between the conventional technique (using a mechanical alignment guide alone) and the smartphone technique (using a mechanical alignment guide combined with the devised instrument and smartphone).

METHODS

A historical controlled trial was conducted among 82 patients who underwent primary THAs through a posterolateral approach. In the conventional group, 41 cups were placed during January 2013 and December 2014, whereas 41 cups in the smartphone group were placed during January 2015 and March 2016. Inclination and anteversion angles were measured in standardized pelvic radiographs. The cup orientation was compared between groups.

RESULTS

The inclination angle in the smartphone group was significantly lower than in the conventional group (40.9° (SD 3.8) vs. 46.3° (SD 6.7), p < 0.001), but the anteversion angle was higher (19.6° (SD 4.4) vs. 16.5° (SD 6.1), p = 0.010). The smartphone group had more cups positioned in the Lewinnek safe zone (90.2% vs. 56.1%, p = 0.001) and longer operative times (136 (SD 27) vs. 119 (SD 23) min, p = 0.011). No significant difference was found for blood loss ( p== 0.384) or dislocation rate ( p = 0.494).

CONCLUSION

Using the computerized function of smartphone could improve the precision of cup positioning. Most cups were placed within a narrow margin inside the Lewinnek safe zone.

An umbrella review comparing computer-assisted and conventional total joint arthroplasty: quality assessment and summary of evidence

Background

Systematic reviews (SRs) of computer-assisted (CA) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) report conflicting evidence on its superiority over conventional surgery. Little is known about the quality of these SRs; variability in their methodological quality may be a contributing factor. We evaluated the methodological quality of all published SRs to date, summarized and examined the consistency of the evidence generated by these SRs.

Methods

We searched four databases through December 31, 2018. A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR 2) was applied to assess the methodological quality. Evidence from included meta-analyses on functional, radiological and patient-safety outcomes was summarized. The corrected covered area was calculated to assess the overlap between SRs in including the primary studies.

Results

Based on AMSTAR 2, confidence was critically low in 39 of the 42 included SRs and low in 3 SRs. Low rating was mainly due to failure in developing a review protocol (90.5%); providing a list of excluded studies (81%); accounting for risk of bias when discussing the results (67%); using a comprehensive search strategy (50%); and investigating publication bias (50%). Despite inconsistency between SR findings comparing functional, radiological and patient safety outcomes for CA and conventional procedures, most TKA meta-analyses favored CA TKA, whereas most THA meta-analyses showed no difference. Moderate overlap was observed among TKA SRs and high overlap among THA SRs.

Conclusions

Despite conclusions of meta-analyses favoring CA arthroplasty, decision makers adopting this technology should be aware of the low confidence in the results of the included SRs. To improve confidence in future SRs, journals should consider using a methodological assessment tool to evaluate the SRs prior to making a publication decision.

Evaluation of the geometric accuracy of computed tomography and microcomputed tomography of the articular surface of the distal portion of the radius of cats

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate accuracy of articular surfaces determined by use of 2 perpendicular CT orientations, micro-CT, and laser scanning.

SAMPLE

23 cat cadavers.

PROCEDURES

Images of antebrachia were obtained by use of CT (voxel size, 0.6 mm) in longitudinal orientation (CT_LO images) and transverse orientation (CT_TO images) and by use of micro-CT (voxel size, 0.024 mm) in a longitudinal orientation. Images were reconstructed. Craniocaudal and mediolateral length, radius of curvature, and deviation of the articular surface of the distal portion of the radius of 3-D renderings for CT_LO, CT_TO, and micro-CT images were compared with results of 3-D renderings acquired with a laser scanner (resolution, 0.025 mm).

RESULTS

Measurement of CT_LO and CT_TO images overestimated craniocaudal and mediolateral length of the articular surface by 4% to 10%. Measurement of micro-CT images underestimated craniocaudal and mediolateral length by 1%. Measurement of CT_LO and CT_TO images underestimated mediolateral radius of curvature by 15% and overestimated craniocaudal radius of curvature by > 100%; use of micro-CT images underestimated them by 3% and 5%, respectively. Mean ± SD surface deviation was 0.26 ± 0.09 mm for CT_LO images, 0.30 ± 0.28 mm for CT_TO images, and 0.04 ± 0.02 mm for micro-CT images.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Articular surface models derived from CT images had dimensional errors that approximately matched the voxel size. Thus, CT cannot be used to plan conforming arthroplasties in small joints and could lack precision when used to plan the correction of a limb deformity or repair of a fracture.

A Novel Method for Correcting Pelvic Tilt on Anteroposterior Pelvic Radiographs

Background Anteroposterior (AP) pelvic radiographs remain the standard for pre- and postoperative imaging during total hip arthroplasty (THA), despite the known limitation of plain films, including the inability to adequately account for distortion caused by variations in pelvic orientation such as pelvic tilt. The purpose of this study was to develop a reliable method for correcting pelvic tilt on AP pelvic radiographs in patients undergoing THA. Methods CT scans from 20 patients/cadaver specimens (10 male, 10 female) were used to create 3D renderings, from which synthetic radiographs of each pelvis were generated. For each pelvis, 13 synthetic radiographs were generated, showing the pelvis at between -30° and 30° of pelvic tilt, in 5° increments. On each image, eight unique parameters/distances were measured to determine the most appropriate parameters for the calculation of pelvic tilt. The most reliable and accurate of these parameters was determined via regression analysis and used to create gender-specific nomograms from which pelvic tilt measurements could be calculated. The accuracy and reliability of the nomograms and correction method were subsequently validated using both synthetic radiographs (n=50) and stereoradiographic images (n=58). Results Of the eight parameters measured, the vertical distance between the superior margin of the pubic symphysis and the transischial line (PSTI) was determined to be the most reliable (r=-0.96, ICC=0.94). Using that parameter and applying the associated nomograms to 50 synthetic radiographs of random pelvic tilt, the mean difference between the actual pelvic tilt and that calculated using the correction method was 0.1°±5.1° (p=0.98, r=0.96). In 58 stereoradiographic images, the mean difference between actual and measured pelvic tilt was -0.2°±6.4° (p=0.74, r=0.77). The pooled results indicate no significant difference between actual (2.2°±13.9°) and measured pelvic tilt (2.1°±14.3°, p=0.93, r=0.91). No significant differences were noted based on gender. Conclusions Our method of correcting for pelvic tilt using the vertical distance from the pubic symphysis to the transischial line provides a reliable method for correcting for pelvic tilt on AP pelvic radiographs.

Computer Navigation vs Conventional Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Medicare Database Analysis

BACKGROUND

Computer-assisted surgery (CAS) is applied to total hip arthroplasty (THA) in an attempt to optimize implant positioning. The effect of CAS on postoperative complications after THA remains unknown. Our study aims to assess the change in complication rates when CAS is used in THA.

METHODS

The Medicare database was studied from 2005 to 2012. All THAs performed with CAS were identified. A total of 64,944 THAs were identified, including 5412 CAS-THAs and 59,532 conventional THAs. Medical and surgical adverse events were collected at various time points.

RESULTS

CAS-THA was not associated with a decreased rate of dislocation at 30 days (1.0% vs 1.2%; odds ratio [OR], 1.14; P = .310), 90 days (1.1% vs 1.4%; OR, 1.23; P = .090), or 2 years (2.3% vs 2.3%; OR, 1.01; P = .931). CAS-THA was associated with a significantly higher rate of periprosthetic fracture at 30 days (0.4% vs 0.6%; OR, 1.46; P = .040) as well as revision THA at 30 days (1.0% vs 1.4%; OR, 1.43; P = .003) and 90 days (1.2% vs 1.7%; OR, 1.42; P < .002) when compared to conventional THA. CAS-THA was associated with a significantly lower rate of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism when compared to conventional THA at all time points (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Administrative coding data fail to demonstrate any clinically significant reduction in short-term adverse events with CAS-THA. Further study is warranted to evaluate whether the purported benefits of CAS result in a reduction of the adverse events after THA.

Trigonometric Algorithm Defining the True Three-Dimensional Acetabular Cup Orientation: Correlation Between Measured and Calculated Cup Orientation Angles

BACKGROUND

Acetabular cup orientation plays a key role in implant stability and the success of total hip arthroplasty. To date, the orientation has been measured with different imaging modalities and definitions, leading to lack of consensus on optimal cup placement. A 3-dimensional (3D) concept involving a trigonometric description enables unambiguous definitions. Our objective was to test the validity and reliability of a 3D trigonometric description of cup orientation.

METHODS

Computed tomographic scans of the pelvis, performed for vascular assessment of 20 patients with 22 primary total hip replacements in situ, were systematically collected. On multiplanar reconstructions, 3 observers independently measured cup orientation retrospectively in terms of coronal inclination, sagittal tilt, and transverse version. The angles measured in 2 planes were used to calculate the angle in the third plane via a trigonometric algorithm. For correlation and reliability analyses, intraobserver and interobserver differences between measured and calculated angles were evaluated with use of the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

RESULTS

Measured and calculated angles had ICCs of 0.953 for coronal inclination, 0.985 for sagittal tilt, and 0.982 for transverse version. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability had ICCs of 0.987 and 0.987, respectively, for coronal inclination; 0.979 and 0.981, respectively, for sagittal tilt; and 0.992 and 0.978, respectively, for transverse version.

CONCLUSIONS

The 3D concept with its trigonometric algorithm is a valid and reliable tool for the measurement of cup orientation.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

By calculating the transverse version of cups from coronal inclination and sagittal tilt measurements, the trigonometric algorithm enables a 3D definition of cup orientation, regardless of the imaging modality used. In addition, it introduces sagittal tilt that, like pelvic tilt, rotates around the transverse axis.

3D-printed Patient-specific Guides for Hip Arthroplasty

Surgeons and engineers constantly search for methods to improve the surgical positioning of implants used for joint arthroplasty. Rapid prototyping is being used to develop patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) and has already been successfully translated into large-scale clinical use for knee arthroplasty. PSI has been used in shoulder arthroplasty; however, it is not yet known whether PSI provides improved accuracy and outcomes compared with conventional methods in either shoulder arthroplasty or knee arthroplasty. In the hip, PSI has been limited to the positioning of custom-manufactured implants and a small number of surgeons testing the emerging solutions from different manufacturers. Early results indicate consistent accurate positioning of implants with the use of PSI in hip arthroplasty but with added costs and uncertain effect on clinical outcomes.

The posterior acetabular wall (PAW): an aid to acetabular orientation at primary THA

INTRODUCTION

Incorrect acetabular component positioning during total hip arthroplasty (THA) may lead to dislocation, impingement, wear and revision. Surgeons commonly use the transverse acetabular ligament (TAL) as a landmark for acetabular component orientation. The posterior acetabular wall (PAW) is a structure easily viewed on plain radiography and its position can help guide acetabular component position. In this study, we examine the efficacy of preoperative radiographs in predicting cup position relative to the PAW.

METHODS

Prospective data was recorded on radiographic findings of the posterior wall (prominent, normal, deficient) on a consecutive series of 200 primary THAs utilising a standardised posterior approach. The final cup position relative to the wall was recorded (prominent, flush, deep). Cup inclination and version were then assessed by postoperative radiography and any instances of dislocation recorded.

RESULTS

There were 117 females and 83 males with a mean age of 66.5 years. 154 were recorded as having a normal PAW on radiographs, 152 had the cup positioned in line with the TAL and flush to the PAW. 29 had a deficient PAW and 27 of these had a cup positioned prominently with 17 having a prominent PAW and of these 16 a deep cup position. Postoperative radiographs showed a mean cup version of 20.8° and inclination of 44.7° using this method. There were 21 outliers (10.5%) with no dislocations at a minimum 12-month follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The TAL is a continuation of the posterior labrum. As such, the posterior wall is a useful adjunct to and surrogate landmark for the TAL. It has the added advantage that it is visible on radiographs and so aids surgical planning with respect to cup positioning.

Effective dose in low-dose CT compared with radiography for templating of total hip arthroplasty

Background Recently, total hip arthroplasty (THA) has come to focus on restoration of individual anatomy including femoral neck anteversion and global offset (femoral and acetabular offset). Three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) data could provide a better basis for preoperative templating. The use of CT has been hampered by high radiation dose. Purpose To evaluate the effective dose used in pelvis and hip CT for THA templating. Material and Methods CT data from two clinical trials of THA were evaluated for CT scan length and volume CT dose index (CTDI_vol). The effective doses from hip-knee-ankle CT and pelvis and hip radiography were compared. Conversion factors for effective dose for radiography were calculated using the PCXMC software. Results A reduced dose CT protocol for pelvis imaging gave a substantial dose reduction compared with standard CT, while maintaining sufficient image quality. Between the two clinical trials there was a significant reduction in effective CT dose corresponding to changes in the CT protocol ( P < 0.01). The CT dose for the latter group was similar to, but nevertheless significantly higher than for, radiography ( P < 0.01). However, in the latter group the theoretical minimum dose for CT, using the minimum scan length required by the templating software, was equal to the dose from radiography. Conclusion Although the CT dose remained higher than for radiography, potential reductions in scan length could reduce the dose further so that CT would have a comparable level of risk to radiography with the added benefit of 3D templating.

Technology in Arthroplasty: Are We Improving Value?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Total joint arthroplasty is regarded as a highly successful procedure. Patient outcomes and implant longevity, however, are related to proper alignment and position of the prostehses. In an attempt to reduce outliers and improve accuracy and precision of component position, navigation and robotics have been introduced. These technologies, however, come at a price. The goals of this review are to evaluate these technologies in total joint arthroplasty and determine if they add value.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies have demonstrated that navigation and robotics in total joint arthroplasty can decrease outliers while improving accuracy in component positioning. While some studies have demonstrated improved patient reported outcomes, not all studies have shown this to be true. Most studies cite increased cost of equipment and longer operating room times as the major downsides of the technologies at present. Long-term studies are just becoming available and are promising, as some studies have shown decreased revision rates when navigation is used. Finally, there are relatively few studies evaluating the direct cost and value of these technologies. Navigation and robotics have been shown to improve component position in total joint arthroplasty, which can improve patient outcomes and implant longevity. These technologies offer a promising future for total joint arthroplasty.

Accuracy and Precision of a Surgical Navigation System: Effect of Camera and Patient Tracker Position and Number of Active Markers

Introduction:

Surgical navigation systems are increasingly used to aid resection and reconstruction of osseous malignancies. In the process of implementing image-based surgical navigation systems, there are numerous opportunities for error that may impact surgical outcome. This study aimed to examine modifiable sources of error in an idealized scenario, when using a bidirectional infrared surgical navigation system.

Materials and Methods:

Accuracy and precision were assessed using a computerized-numerical-controlled (CNC) machined grid with known distances between indentations while varying: 1) the distance from the grid to the navigation camera (range 150 to 247cm), 2) the distance from the grid to the patient tracker device (range 20 to 40cm), and 3) whether the minimum or maximum number of bidirectional infrared markers were actively functioning. For each scenario, distances between grid points were measured at 10-mm increments between 10 and 120mm, with twelve measurements made at each distance. The accuracy outcome was the root mean square (RMS) error between the navigation system distance and the actual grid distance. To assess precision, four indentations were recorded six times for each scenario while also varying the angle of the navigation system pointer. The outcome for precision testing was the standard deviation of the distance between each measured point to the mean three-dimensional coordinate of the six points for each cluster.

Results:

Univariate and multiple linear regression revealed that as the distance from the navigation camera to the grid increased, the RMS error increased (p<0.001). The RMS error also increased when not all infrared markers were actively tracking (p=0.03), and as the measured distance increased (p<0.001). In a multivariate model, these factors accounted for 58% of the overall variance in the RMS error. Standard deviations in repeated measures also increased when not all infrared markers were active (p<0.001), and as the distance between navigation camera and physical space increased (p=0.005). Location of the patient tracker did not affect accuracy (0.36) or precision (p=0.97)

Conclusion:

In our model laboratory test environment, the infrared bidirectional navigation system was more accurate and precise when the distance from the navigation camera to the physical (working) space was minimized and all bidirectional markers were active. These findings may require alterations in operating room setup and software changes to improve the performance of this system.

What do we get from navigation in primary THA?

Navigation in primary total hip arthroplasty has a history of over 20 years. During this process, imageless computer navigation can be particularly helpful in optimally restoring the hip’s biomechanics. This involves the accurate placement of the acetabular component with the determination of the anteversion and abduction, whereby the navigated femur-first technique also allows for a calculation of the combined anteversion. Additional critical parameters such as the reconstruction of the rotation centre, as well as the femoral and acetabular offset, can also be optimally adjusted. Last but not least, an intra-operative evaluation and equalisation of the leg length is possible.

Nonetheless, the disadvantages of this surgical technique in terms of the high costs in the acquisition and preservation of the necessary devices, as well as the longer operation time, must be taken into account. However, economic aspects are not the only thing preventing widespread use of the navigation technique. Determining the plane of reference (APP) for the optimal orientation of the implants is based on palpation of the bony landmarks – and this is influenced by the thickness of the soft tissue layer. Furthermore, the experience of the surgeon constitutes a variable that influences the accuracy of navigation.

In summary, hip navigation certainly offers an interesting technique for the optimisation of total hip arthroplasty with reconstruction of proper biomechanics. At the same time, there is currently a lack of high-quality randomised controlled long-term trials that evaluate the clinical advantage for the patients, together with cost utility and survival rates.

Cite this article: Renner L, Janz V, Perka C, Wassilew GI. What do we get from navigation in primary THA? EFORT Open Rev 2016;1:205-210. 10.1302/2058-5241.1.000034.

A Patient-Specific Instrument for Femoral Stem Placement During Total Hip Arthroplasty

To ensure that the femoral stem is placed in the proper position during total hip arthroplasty, the authors developed a patient-specific instrument. A total of 10 total hip arthroplasties were performed with the assistance of the patient-specific instrument during this study. The mean accuracy of stem tilt, varus/valgus, and anteversion was 2.1°±4.1°, 1.0°±0.7°, and 4.7°±1.2°, respectively. No complications were observed and no reoperations were required for any of the patients who underwent surgery included in this study. The results support the feasibility of this patient-specific instrument for use during stem placement in total hip arthroplasty. [Orthopedics. 2017; 40(2):e374-e377.].

Acetabular cup position and risk of dislocation in primary total hip arthroplasty

Background and purpose - Hip dislocation is one of the most common complications following total hip arthroplasty (THA). Several factors that affect dislocation have been identified, including acetabular cup positioning. Optimal values for cup inclination and anteversion are debatable. We performed a systematic review to describe the different methods for measuring cup placement, target zones for cup positioning, and the association between cup positioning and dislocation following primary THA. Methods - A systematic search of literature in the PubMed database was performed (January and February 2016) to identify articles that compared acetabular cup positioning and the risk of dislocation. Surgical approach and methods for measurement of cup angles were also considered. Results - 28 articles were determined to be relevant to our research question. Some articles demonstrated that cup positioning influenced postoperative dislocation whereas others did not. The majority of articles could not identify a statistically significant difference between dislocating and non-dislocating THA with regard to mean angles of cup anteversion and inclination. Most of the articles that assessed cup placement within the Lewinnek safe zone did not show a statistically significant reduction in dislocation rate. Alternative target ranges have been proposed by several authors. Interpretation - The Lewinnek safe zone could not be justified. It is difficult to draw broad conclusions regarding a definitive target zone for cup positioning in THA, due to variability between studies and the likely multifactorial nature of THA dislocation. Future studies comparing cup positioning and dislocation rate should investigate surgical approach separately. Standardized tools for measurement of cup positioning should be implemented to allow comparison between studies.

Cup implantation accuracy using the HipCOMPASS mechanical intraoperative support device

Background

While navigation systems have been developed to increase implantation accuracy in total hip arthroplasty (THA), they are not yet sufficiently versatile or commonly used. Therefore, to elevate the appeal of such systems, we have developed HipCOMPASS, a simple and effective mechanical angle indicator for use in supine THA.

Questions/purposes

How accurate is the mean cup orientation [in terms of errors in radiographic anteversion (RA) and inclination (RI)] in cases where HipCOMPASS is used for intraoperative support? Does HipCOMPASS increase this cup orientation accuracy compared to THA cases without it? Does HipCOMPASS increase mean operation time?

Methods

We measured cup orientation in 97 THA cases with HipCOMPASS and in 80 cases without it. Then we compared the angles determined in preoperative planning with the angles revealed by postoperative computed tomography (CT) for both groups. The discrepancy between them was defined as an error. Errors greater than 10° were considered outliers. Additionally, mean operative time with and without the Hip COMPASS were compared.

Results

With the use of HipCOMPASS, the mean absolute error values in radiographic anteversion and inclination were 2.9° ± 2.3° (range 0°–12.8°) and 2.9° ± 2.1° (0.1°–7.7°), respectively. In contrast, without the use of HipCOMPASS, radiographic anteversion and inclination error values were 8.8° ± 5.8° (0.1°–25.4°) and 6.1° ± 4.5° (0.2°–21.0°), respectively. Outlier occurrence rates were 1.0 % with HipCOMPASS and 48.8 % without it. Mean operative times with and without HipCOMPASS use were 109.2 ± 23.8 min (74–199 min) and 137.6 ± 40.6 min (71–298 min), respectively.

Conclusions

The study has found that HipCOMPASS dramatically increases implantation accuracy and it is also a simple and highly versatile tool that can be implemented quickly. Given its low cost in addition to its favourable accuracy, simple implementation, and short operative time, HipCOMPASS can be regarded as a very useful and effective THA support device.

Level of evidence

Retrospective comparative study, Level 3.

Assessment of Accuracy and Reliability in Acetabular Cup Placement Using an iPhone/iPad System

Implant positioning is one of the critical factors that influences postoperative outcome of total hip arthroplasty (THA). Malpositioning of the implant may lead to an increased risk of postoperative complications such as prosthetic impingement, dislocation, restricted range of motion, polyethylene wear, and loosening. In 2012, the intraoperative use of smartphone technology in THA for improved accuracy of acetabular cup placement was reported. The purpose of this study was to examine the accuracy of an iPhone/iPad-guided technique in positioning the acetabular cup in THA compared with the reference values obtained from the image-free navigation system in a cadaveric experiment. Five hips of 5 embalmed whole-body cadavers were used in the study. Seven orthopedic surgeons (4 residents and 3 senior hip surgeons) participated in the study. All of the surgeons examined each of the 5 hips 3 times. The target angle was 38°/19° for operative inclination/anteversion angles, which corresponded to radiographic inclination/anteversion angles of 40°/15°. The simultaneous assessment using the navigation system showed mean±SD radiographic alignment angles of 39.4°±2.6° and 16.4°±2.6° for inclination and anteversion, respectively. Assessment of cup positioning based on Lewinnek's safe zone criteria showed all of the procedures (n=105) achieved acceptable alignment within the safe zone. A comparison of the performances by resident and senior hip surgeons showed no significant difference between the groups (P=.74 for inclination and P=.81 for anteversion). The iPhone/iPad technique examined in this study could achieve acceptable performance in determining cup alignment in THA regardless of the surgeon's expertise. [Orthopedics. 2016; 39(4):e621-e626.].

EOS-based cup navigation: Randomised controlled trial in 78 total hip arthroplasties

BACKGROUND

Minimising the risk of cup implantation outside the safe zone is among the objectives of navigation during total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, given the technical challenges raised by navigation when the patient is lying on the side, many surgeons still use the freehand technique. We conducted a randomised controlled trial to evaluate the new navigation system NAVEOS in the iliac plane, which is easily identified in the lateral decubitus position, with the objective of determining whether NAVEOS navigation decreased the frequency of cup implantation outside the safe zone compared to freehand cup positioning, without increasing the operative time or the frequency of complications.

HYPOTHESIS

NAVEOS navigation decreases the frequency of cup positioning outside the safe zone compared to freehand positioning.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This randomised controlled trial compared cup positioning using NAVEOS navigation versus the freehand technique in patients undergoing primary THA. The safe zone was defined according to Lewinnek as 15±10° of radiological anteversion and 40±10° of radiological inclination. Cup position parameters were measured on computed tomography images obtained 3months after THA. The images were read by two independent observers who were blinded to group assignment. The primary evaluation criterion was cup position within the safe zone.

RESULTS

A 1:1 randomisation scheme was used to assign 78 patients (mean age, 68years; age range, 44-91years) to NAVEOS navigation or freehand cup positioning. The two groups were comparable for age, gender distribution, body mass index, and preoperative functional scores. In the NAVEOS group, navigation was discontinued prematurely in 6 patients, because of technical difficulties (n=2) or a marked discrepancy with clinical findings (n=4); however, the intention-to-treat approach was used for the analysis. The proportion of cups in the safe zone was 67% (28/39) in the NAVEOS group and 38% (17/39) in the freehand group (P=0.012). Anteversion was within the 5-25° range for 72% (28/39) cups in the NAVEOS group and 46% (18/39) in the freehand group (P=0.021). Inclination was within the 30-50° range for 95% (37/39) of cups with NAVEOS navigation and 85% (33/39) with freehand positioning (P=0.135). The odds ratio for cup implantation outside the safe zone was significantly lower with NAVEOS compared to freehand positioning (0.54; 95% confidence interval, 0.31-0.91). Mean operative time was 74 (range, 45-115) minutes with NAVEOS navigation and 70 (range, 40-105) minutes with freehand positioning (P=0.382). Complications consisted of 1 case each of anterior dislocation and infection, both in the freehand group.

DISCUSSION

Compared to freehand positioning, NAVEOS navigation significantly lowered the risk of cup positioning outside the safe zone, chiefly via improved achievement of the anteversion target. NAVEOS was not associated with increases in operative time or morbidity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II, randomised controlled trial with limited statistical power.

Total hip replacement and surface replacement for the treatment of pain and disability resulting from end-stage arthritis of the hip (review of technology appraisal guidance 2 and 44): systematic review and economic evaluation

BACKGROUND

Total hip replacement (THR) involves the replacement of a damaged hip joint with an artificial hip prosthesis. Resurfacing arthroplasty (RS) involves replacement of the joint surface of the femoral head with a metal surface covering.

OBJECTIVES

To undertake clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness analysis of different types of THR and RS for the treatment of pain and disability in people with end-stage arthritis of the hip, in particular to compare the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of (1) different types of primary THR and RS for people in whom both procedures are suitable and (2) different types of primary THR for people who are not suitable for hip RS.

DATA SOURCES

Electronic databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, Current Controlled Trials and UK Clinical Research Network (UKCRN) Portfolio Database were searched in December 2012, with searches limited to publications from 2008 and sample sizes of ≥ 100 participants. Reference lists and websites of manufacturers and professional organisations were also screened.

REVIEW METHODS

Systematic reviews of the literature were undertaken to appraise the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different types of THR and RS for people with end-stage arthritis of the hip. Included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews were data extracted and risk of bias and methodological quality were independently assessed by two reviewers using the Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool and the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) tool. A Markov multistate model was developed for the economic evaluation of the technologies. Sensitivity analyses stratified by sex and controlled for age were carried out to assess the robustness of the results.

RESULTS

A total of 2469 records were screened of which 37 were included, representing 16 RCTs and eight systematic reviews. The mean post-THR Harris Hip Score measured at different follow-up times (from 6 months to 10 years) did not differ between THR groups, including between cross-linked polyethylene and traditional polyethylene cup liners (pooled mean difference 2.29, 95% confidence interval -0.88 to 5.45). Five systematic reviews reported evidence on different types of THR (cemented vs. cementless cup fixation and implant articulation materials) but these reviews were inconclusive. Eleven cost-effectiveness studies were included; four provided relevant cost and utility data for the model. Thirty registry studies were included, with no studies reporting better implant survival for RS than for all types of THR. For all analyses, mean costs for RS were higher than those for THR and mean quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were lower. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for RS was dominated by THR, that is, THR was cheaper and more effective than RS (for a lifetime horizon in the base-case analysis, the incremental cost of RS was £11,284 and the incremental QALYs were -0.0879). For all age and sex groups RS remained clearly dominated by THR. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves showed that, for all patients, THR was almost 100% cost-effective at any willingness-to-pay level. There were age and sex differences in the populations with different types of THR and variations in revision rates (from 1.6% to 3.5% at 9 years). For the base-case analysis, for all age and sex groups and a lifetime horizon, mean costs for category E (cemented components with a polyethylene-on-ceramic articulation) were slightly lower and mean QALYs for category E were slightly higher than those for all other THR categories in both deterministic and probabilistic analyses. Hence, category E dominated the other four categories. Sensitivity analysis using an age- and sex-adjusted log-normal model demonstrated that, over a lifetime horizon and at a willingness-to-pay threshold of £20,000 per QALY, categories A and E were equally likely (50%) to be cost-effective.

LIMITATIONS

A large proportion of the included studies were inconclusive because of poor reporting, missing data, inconsistent results and/or great uncertainty in the treatment effect estimates. This warrants cautious interpretation of the findings. The evidence on complications was scarce, which may be because of the absence or rarity of these events or because of under-reporting. The poor reporting meant that it was not possible to explore contextual factors that might have influenced study results and also reduced the applicability of the findings to routine clinical practice in the UK. The scope of the review was limited to evidence published in English in 2008 or later, which could be interpreted as a weakness; however, systematic reviews would provide summary evidence for studies published before 2008.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with THR, revision rates for RS were higher, mean costs for RS were higher and mean QALYs gained were lower; RS was dominated by THR. Similar results were obtained in the deterministic and probabilistic analyses and for all age and sex groups THR was almost 100% cost-effective at any willingness-to-pay level. Revision rates for all types of THR were low. Category A THR (cemented components with a polyethylene-on-metal articulation) was more cost-effective for older age groups. However, across all age-sex groups combined, the mean cost for category E THR (cemented components with a polyethylene-on-ceramic articulation) was slightly lower and the mean QALYs gained were slightly higher. Category E therefore dominated the other four categories. Certain types of THR appeared to confer some benefit, including larger femoral head sizes, use of a cemented cup, use of a cross-linked polyethylene cup liner and a ceramic-on-ceramic as opposed to a metal-on-polyethylene articulation. Further RCTs with long-term follow-up are needed.

STUDY REGISTRATION

This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42013003924.

FUNDING

The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.

Application of Rapid Prototyping Pelvic Model for Patients with DDH to Facilitate Arthroplasty Planning: A Pilot Study

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is challenging in cases of osteoarthritis secondary to developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). Acetabular deficiency makes the positioning of the acetabular component difficult. Computer tomography based, patient-individual three dimensional (3-D) rapid prototype technology (RPT)-models were used to plan the placement of acetabular cup so that a surgeon was able to identify pelvic structures, assess the ideal extent of reaming and determine the size of cup after a reconstructive procedure. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to analyze the agreement between the sizes of chosen components on the basis of preoperative planning and the actual sizes used in the operation. The use of the 3-D RPT-model facilitates the surgical procedures due to better planning and improved orientation.

Imageless navigation versus traditional method in total hip arthroplasty: A meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Accuracy of acetabular component orientation is improved with computer navigation in THA. In recent years, imageless navigation has become more commonplace, whereas there still exist different arguments about this technique.

METHODS

We conducted a meta-analysis to assess the accuracy of imageless navigation for acetabular implantation in total hip arthroplasty. The computer based online search strategy covered the major medical databases (Cochrane Library, Medline, Pubmed, and EmbaseI) from January 2004 to December 2014. Data of selected clinical trials were analysed using Revman 5.1 software.

RESULTS

7 clinical trials enrolling 485 patients were included. Mean cup inclination and anteversion were not statistically significantly different between the conventional groups and the imageless computer navigated groups (P = 0.83 and P = 0.89 respectively). Deviation from the desired position of inclination shows no significant differences (P = 0.06), whereas deviation from the desired position of anteversion was smaller in computer navigated group (P<0.0001). Only one study gave useful information about operation time which is significantly increased (MD = 23.00, P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Current literature generally hold the opinion that navigation is a reliable tool to optimize cup placement, but still there are some different voices about imageless navigation system. This meta-analysis emphasizing more on the accuracy of cup-positioning with imageless navigation reveals that imageless navigation is preferable compared with traditional method.

Acetabular component navigation in lateral decubitus based on EOS imaging: A preliminary study of 13 cases

INTRODUCTION

Acetabular component navigation classically requires palpation of the bone landmarks defining the anterior pelvic plane (APP) (anterior superior iliac spine [ASIS] and pubis), the recording of which is not very reliable when performed in lateral decubitus. The objectives of the current experimental study were: (1) to assess the clinical feasibility of NAVEOS navigation (based on EOS imaging) in lateral decubitus; and (2) to compare precision versus classical APP-based navigation (NAVAPP).

HYPOTHESIS

Iliac plane navigation using EOS is as reliable as APP navigation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A continuous prospective series of 13 total hip replacements were implanted in lateral decubitus under APP-guided navigation (NAVAPP). Planning used preoperative EOS measurement. The ASIS, pubis and ipsilateral posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS) were located and exported to the navigator. Intra-operatively, NAVEOS landmarks (acetabular center, ASIS and PSIS on the operated side) were palpated. Postoperatively, cup inclination and anteversion with respect to the APP were measured on EOS imaging (SterEOS3D software). The SterEOS3D measurements were compared to those of the performed NAVAPP and simulated NAVEOS navigations.

RESULTS

Three patients were excluded for technical reasons. In the remaining 10, inclination on NAVAPP and SterEOS3D differed by a median 4° (range, 0-12°), and on NAVEOS versus SteEOS3D by 5° (range, 2-10°); anteversion on NAVAPP and SterEOS3D differed by a median 4.5° (range, 0-12°), and on NAVEOS versus SteEOS3D by 4° (range, 0-14°).

CONCLUSION

Precision was comparable between NAVEOS and classical navigation. NAVEOS simplifies cup navigation in lateral decubitus on initial acquisition. These results require validation on a larger sample.

Navigated Acetabular Cup Fixation for Acetabular Deformity or Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

Purpose

To evaluate the usefulness of navigated acetabular cup fixation for total hip arthroplasty in patients with acetabular deformity or revision total hip arthroplasty.

Materials and Methods

This study enrolled 28 patients with at least 12 months' follow-up. The safe zone of the acetabular cup was defined as 40°±10°in inclination and 15°±10°in anteversion. The authors used the navigation and radiographic data to determine whether the acetabular cup was located within the safe zone or not. To evaluate the clinical outcomes, preoperative and last follow-up Harris hip scores were checked, and the occurrence of complications was evaluated.

Results

According to the navigation data, the mean inclination and anteversion were 38.5°±4.7°(range, 32°-50°) and 16.6°±4.0°(range, 8°-23°), respectively. According to the radiographic data the mean inclination and anteversion were 40.5°±4.6°(range, 32°-50°) and 19.4°±4.2°(range, 8°-25°), respectively. In both cases, all values were within the safe zone. Harris hip score was improved in all patients from preoperative 52.3±14.4 points (range, 29-87 points) to 88.0±9.0 points (range, 65-99 points) at the last follow-up. There was no dislocation or loosening of both cases.

Conclusion

Navigated acetabular cup fixation is a useful technique for total hip arthroplasty in patients with acetabular deformity or revision total hip arthroplasty because it prevents the malposition and related complications.

Navigating the reaming of the acetabular cavity in total hip arthroplasty: does it improve implantation accuracy?

Computer navigation in total hip arthroplasty is used to improve accuracy of component implantation. Reaming of the acetabular cavity during total hip arthroplasty (THA) can be navigated although this is not done routinely. We hypothesised that navigating the reaming of the acetabular cavity will improve implantation accuracy. A single surgeon series of 100 navigated THAs were analysed retrospectively. In 49 the reaming of the acetabular cavity was done using navigation and in 51 this was done freehand. The verified cup position and the error from the planned position were recorded. The mean error from planned to verified inclination was 2.20 degrees (SD 1.59°) in the navigated group versus 2.33 degrees (SD 1.96°) in the freehand group. The mean anteversion error was 1.92 degrees (SD 1.51°) for the navigated group and 1.45 degrees (SD 1.38°) for the freehand group. This was not statistically significant. This rejects our hypothesis. Navigating the reaming of the acetabular cavity did not improve the accuracy of the implantation against the set inclination and anteversion target during computer navigated THA.

Computed tomography for preoperative planning in total hip arthroplasty: what radiologists need to know

The number of total hip arthroplasties is continuously rising. Although less invasive surgical techniques, sophisticated component design, and intraoperative navigation techniques have been introduced, the rate of peri- and postoperative complications, including dislocations, fractures, nerve palsies, and infections, is still a major clinical problem. Better patient outcome, faster recovery and rehabilitation, and shorter operation times therefore remain to be accomplished. A promising strategy is to use minimally invasive techniques in conjunction with modular implants, aimed at independently reconstructing femoral offset and leg length on the basis of highly accurate preoperative planning. Plain radiographs have clear limitations for the correct estimation of hip joint geometry and bone quality. Three-dimensional assessment based on computed tomography (CT) allows optimizing the choice and positions of implants and anticipating difficulties to be encountered during surgery. Postoperative CT is used to monitor operative translation and plays a role in arthroplastic quality management. Radiologists should be familiar with the needs of orthopedic surgeons in terms of CT acquisition, post-processing, and data transfer. The CT protocol should be optimized to enhance image quality and reduce radiation exposure. When dedicated orthopedic CT protocols and state-of-the-art scanner hardware are used, radiation exposure can be decreased to a level just marginally higher than that of conventional preoperative radiography. Surgeons and radiologists should use similar terminology to avoid misunderstanding and inaccuracies in the transfer of preoperative planning.