How precise is the identification of the center of the femoral head during total knee arthroplasty?

The use of virtual reality to assess the bony landmarks at the knee joint - The role of imaging modality and the assessor's experience

BACKGROUND

At present, extended reality technologies such as virtual reality (VR) have gained popularity in orthopedic surgery. The first aim of this study was to assess the precision of VR and other imaging modalities - computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) - to localize bony landmarks near the knee joint. Secondly, the impact of the educational level of the assessor - medical master students, orthopedic residents, and orthopedic surgeons - on the precision with which landmarks near the knee joint could be localized was analyzed.

METHODS

We included a total of 77 participants: 62 medical master students, 10 orthopedic residents, and 5 orthopedic surgeons to analyze three cadaver legs. Every participant localized a series of sixteen bony landmarks on six different imaging modalities (CT, MRI, 3D-CT, 3D-MRI, VR-CT, VR-MRI).

RESULTS

Concerning the imaging modality, the inter- and intra-observer variability were lowest for 3D and VR, higher for MRI (respectively 7.6 mm and 6.9 mm), and highest for CT (respectively 9 mm and 8.7 m).Concerning the educational level of the assessor, inter- and intra-observer variability in VR were lowest for surgeons, (respectively 3.2 mm and 3.6 mm), higher for residents (respectively 5.9 mm and 6.5 mm) and medical students (respectively 5.9 mm and 5.8 mm).

CONCLUSIONS

VR can be considered a reliable imaging technique. Localization of landmarks tends to be more precise in VR and on 3D than on conventional CT and MRI images. Furthermore, orthopedic surgeons localize landmarks more precisely than orthopedic residents and medical students in VR.

Aseptic survival of the 1.5-stage exchange arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infection was acceptable when using an autoclaved femoral component and a new polyethylene insert

PURPOSE

To investigate the aseptic survival of 1.5-stage exchange arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

Eighty-eight cases of 1.5-stage exchange arthroplasty for PJI without reinfection were retrospectively analysed. The autoclaved femoral component and new polyethylene insert (PE) were implanted using antibiotic mixed cement. The explanted tibial component was not reinserted. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index and range of motion were clinically evaluated preoperatively and at the last follow-up (the last time for the implant in situ). Radiographically, hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) and component positions were measured preoperatively, postoperatively (1 month after the 1.5-stage exchange arthroplasty), and at the last follow-up. The survival rate was analysed using the Kaplan-Meier method, in which failure was defined as reoperation due to aseptic failure. Mean period to failure and failure site were analysed. Factors affecting survival were investigated in terms of demographics and inappropriateness of the postoperative HKA (HKA > 0 ± 3°) and component positions (α angle > 95 ± 3°, β angle > 90 ± 3°, γ angle > 3 ± 3°, and δ angle > 87 ± 3°).

RESULTS

The spacer in-situ time was 3.7 years (0.2-6.4). The clinical results improved hip-knee-ankle significantly at the last follow-up. Radiographically, the average HKA was valgus 0.1° postoperatively. The average α, β, γ, and δ angles of the postoperative component positions were 95.9°, 90.4°, 3.8°, and 86.7°, respectively. The 1-, 2-, and 5-year postoperative survival rates were 90.9%, 86.4%, and 80.6%, respectively. The mean period to failure was 2.0 years (0.2-5.3). There were 18 cases of aseptic loosening (20.8%), occurring on both the femur and tibial sides in 1 knee, and only on the tibial side in 17 knees. Inappropriate coronal position of the PE (β angle > 90 ± 3°) was a significant factor affecting survival (odds ratio = 5.491; p = 0.011).

CONCLUSION

The aseptic survival of the 1.5-stage exchange arthroplasty was acceptable when using an autoclaved femoral component and new PE. The appropriate coronal position of the PE helps ensure favourable survival of 1.5-stage exchange arthroplasty.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Accuracy of the Tibial Component Alignment by Extramedullary System Using Simple Radiographic References in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Background and Objectives: The tibial component alignment is an important issue for the longevity of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of our study was to investigate the usefulness of proximal tibial references determined by pre-operative radiography and intraoperative C-arm-guided hip and ankle center marking for the extramedullary guided tibial cut in mild (<10°) and severe (≥10°) varus knee TKA. Materials and Methods: A total of 150 consecutive patients (220 cases) who underwent total knee arthroplasty who were recruited from July 2011 to April 2017 were reviewed retrospectively. Before surgery, the proximal tibial reference point and medio-lateral cut thickness difference were identified. Then, hip and ankle centers were checked using a C-arm intensifier intraoperatively. The hip−knee−ankle (HKA) alignment and medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) were assessed pre-operatively and post-operatively. More than 3° varus or valgus of HKA alignment or tibial component angle was defined as an outlier. Results: Mean follow-up duration was 26.9 months. Among 220 cases, 111 cases are classified as mild varus group and 109 cases are classified as severe varus group. The HKA alignment is significantly improved (p < 0.001). The average tibial component angle after surgery is 90.1°. A total of 21 cases (9.5%) and 3 cases (1.4%) are classified as outliers of HKA alignment and MPTA, respectively. Among MPTA outliers, one case is in the mild varus group and two cases are in the in severe varus group (p = 0.62). Conclusion: Measurement of proximal tibial radiographic references and checking the C-arm-guided intraoperative hip and ankle center could be helpful to obtain the favorable coronal position of the tibial component in the extramedullary guided tibial cut.

Easy identification of mechanical axis during total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

We devised an intraoperatively identifiable mechanical axis (IIMA) as a reference of alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between February 2010 and January 2011, primary TKAs were consecutively performed on 672 patients (1007 knees) using an IIMA as a reference in the coronal plane.

RESULTS

The alignment of the lower extremity improved from a mean of 11.4±6.7° (-10.3-34.4°) of varus preop. to 0.7±3.5° (-5.2-8.6°) immediately after surgery. Mean alignment of the femoral component in the coronal plane was 89.3±2.3° (83.4-97.2°) postop. and mean alignment of the tibial component was 90.4±2.2° (85.1-94.2°) postop.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that IIMA could be of considerable value as a new guider of alignment that is easily accessible and highly effective during total knee arthroplasty.