Fractures of the proximal humerus

[One-year outcomes after proximal humeral fractures : A risk-adjusted regression analysis of routine data based on 17,322 cases]

BACKGROUND

Proximal humeral fractures (PHF) are the third most common fracture in geriatric traumatology. No standard evidence-based treatment has been established so far. The epidemiology and economic burden highlight the importance of a targeted treatment strategy.

OBJECTIVE

Epidemiology of PHF and analysis of the influence of preoperative length of stay, comorbidities and quality of patient life. Additionally, a comparison to the more frequently studied proximal femoral fractures.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A routine data analysis of 17,322 cases admitted for inpatient treatment with an observational period of 1 year was performed following an established model. Descriptive statistics included comorbidities, treatment procedures and mortality. Analytical statistics using logistic regression with the primary endpoints of early revision, mortality and decubitus within 1 year.

RESULTS

In the investigated PHFs there was a mortality of 13% within 1 year, which is increased three-fold in patients with comorbidities such as cancer. There was an increase of 57% in patients who first received a care level following PHF. A preoperative care level in general significantly decreased survival. The most frequently used surgical procedure was fixation via stable-angle plate (used in 43%). The preoperative length of stay did not impact survival.

DISCUSSION

Intrinsic factors such as preoperative comorbidities are crucial for the mortality after PHF. The PHF affects patients' lives less than proximal femoral fractures. With comparable comorbidity profiles, possible reasons are the lower levels of immobilization and less dependency on care before the fracture in comparison to proximal femoral fractures.

Epidemiology and trends in management of acute proximal humeral fractures in adults: an observational study of 137,436 cases from the Danish National Patient Register, 1996-2018

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Proximal humeral fractures (PHF) can be managed surgically or non-surgically. Locking plates have been the preferred head-preserving surgical technique while hemiarthroplasty (HA) or reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) have been used in joint replacement surgery. We describe the epidemiology and trends in management of acute PHF in Denmark with a focus on (i) changes in the incidence of PHF; (ii) changes in the proportion of surgical cases; and (iii) changes in preferred surgical techniques.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data on diagnoses and interventions was retrieved from the Danish National Patient Register. Patients aged 18 years and above were included. Surgical treatment was defined as the diagnosis of PHF combined with a predefined surgical procedure code within 3 weeks of injury. Data on plate osteosynthesis, HA, RSA, and "other techniques" was retrieved. Non-surgical treatment was defined as no relevant surgical procedure code within 3 weeks.

RESULTS

We identified 137,436 PHF (72% women) in the Danish National Patient Register. The overall mean incidence was 138/100,000/year (500 for women 60 years or above). Non-surgical treatment accounted for 119,966 (87%). The 17,470 surgical procedures included 42% locking plates, 34% arthroplasties, and 25% other techniques. The rate of surgery declined from 17% in 2013 to 11% in 2018.

INTERPRETATION

The overall incidence of PHF remained stable between 1996 and 2018 but the absolute number increased. The approach to PHF remains predominantly non-surgical. The number of surgeries in Denmark have decreased since 2013, especially for locking plates and HA, while RSA is increasingly used.

Interventions for proximal humeral fractures: key messages from a Cochrane review

This article is based on a Cochrane Review published in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) 2022, Issue 6,DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000434.pub5. (see www.cochranelibrary.com for information).

Treatment of 2-Part Proximal Humeral Fractures in Osteoporotic Patients With Medial Calcar Instability Using a PHILOS Plate Plus an Allogeneic Fibula Inserted Obliquely - A Retrospective Study

INTRODUCTION

To date, there is little research assessing the efficacy of a proximal humeral internal locking system (PHILOS) plate plus an allogeneic fibula inserted obliquely in the treatment of 2-part proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) with calcar comminution in patients >60 years old with severe osteoporosis. The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the outcomes of elderly patients with osteoporotic 2-part PHFs combined with medial column (calcar) instability or disruption who experienced a PHILOS plate plus an allogeneic fibula inserted obliquely.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred and twelve consecutive elderly patients with severe osteoporotic 2-part PHFs combined with calcar instability or disruption who were treated with a PHILOS plate plus an allogeneic fibula inserted obliquely were retrospectively identified from 3 tertiary medical centres during 2014-2019. The primary outcomes were the Constant scores and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores; secondary outcome was the rate of key orthopaedic complications.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 24 (15.3-27.6) months. Significant improvements in the median Constant scores were observed (39 [26-58 points] prior to surgery vs 81 [67-95 points] at final follow-up). The median ASES scores improved from 43 (26-64 points) prior to surgery to 83 (65-96 points) at final follow-up. The percentage of key orthopaedic complications was 25.6% (22/86). Four (4.7%) cases had loss of reduction, 4 (4.7%) experienced aseptic loosening, 1 (.8%) had non-union, 4 (4.7%) suffered a periprosthetic fracture, 3 (3.5%) experienced a revision surgery, 1 (.8%) had a dislocation and 5 (5.8%) suffered an unbearable shoulder pain.

CONCLUSION

For elderly patients with osteoporotic 2-part PHFs combined with calcar instability or disruption, PHILOS plate combined with an allogeneic fibula inserted obliquely might have recognisable advantages in decreasing the loss of fixation and preventing medial calcar collapse.

Interobserver and intraobserver agreement of three-dimensionally printed models for the classification of proximal humeral fractures

Hypothesis

This study aimed to examine whether three-dimensionally printed models (3D models) could improve interobserver and intraobserver agreement when classifying proximal humeral fractures (PHFs) using the Neer system. We hypothesized that 3D models would improve interobserver and intraobserver agreement compared with x-ray, two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) and that agreement using 3D models would be higher for registrars than for consultants.

Methods

Thirty consecutive PHF images were selected from a state-wide database and classified by fourteen observers. Each imaging modality (x-ray, 2D CT, 3D CT, 3D models) was grouped and presented in a randomly allocated sequence on two separate occasions. Interobserver and intraobserver agreements were quantified with kappa values (κ), percentage agreement, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results

Seven orthopedic registrars and seven orthopedic consultants classified 30 fractures on one occasion (interobserver). Four registrars and three consultants additionally completed classification on a second occasion (intraobserver). Interobserver agreement was greater with 3D models than with x-ray (κ = 0.47, CI: 0.44-0.50, 66.5%, CI: 64.6-68.4% and κ = 0.29, CI: 0.26-0.31, 57.2%, CI: 55.1-59.3%, respectively), 2D CT (κ = 0.30, CI: 0.27-0.33, 57.8%, CI: 55.5-60.2%), and 3D CT (κ = 0.35, CI: 0.33-0.38, 58.8%, CI: 56.7-60.9%). Intraobserver agreement appeared higher for 3D models than for other modalities; however, results were not significant. There were no differences in interobserver or intraobserver agreement between registrars and consultants.

Conclusion

Three-dimensionally printed models improved interobserver agreement in the classification of PHFs using the Neer system. This has potential implications for using 3D models for surgical planning and teaching.

Imaging to improve agreement for proximal humeral fracture classification in adult patient: A systematic review of quantitative studies

Proximal humeral fracture classification has low reproducibility. Many studies have tried to increase inter- and intra-observer agreement with more sophisticated imaging. The aim of this review was to determine which imaging modality produces the best inter- and intra-observer agreement for proximal humeral fracture classification in adults and to determine if this varies with observer experience or fracture complexity. OvidMEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, EBSCO CINAHL and Elsevier Scopus were searched on July 22nd, 2018. Quantitative studies comparing at least two imaging modalities for inter- or intra-observer agreement of proximal humeral fracture classification in adults were eligible for inclusion in this systematic literature review. Two reviewers independently screened and extracted data. Study quality was appraised using a modified Downs and Black checklist. The search strategy identified 1987 studies, of which 15 met the eligibility criteria. All included studies addressed inter-observer agreement and 8 provided results for intra-observer agreement. A narrative synthesis was performed. Trends were compared between studies as clinical heterogeneity and the statistical measures used by included studies prevented meta-analysis. Inter- and intra-observer agreement was found to increase from radiographs (x-ray) to two-dimensional (2D) computed tomography (CT) to three-dimensional (3D) CT. 2D and 3D CT may improve inter-observer agreement to a greater extent in less experienced observers and in more complex fractures. Future studies should compare 2D and 3D CT with subgroups categorising surgeon experience and fracture complexity. X-ray should be used for initial assessment; however doctors should have a low threshold for ordering CT. PROSPERO number: CRD42018094307.

Biomechanical in vitro evaluation of a ready-to-use calcium phosphate cement implanted to augment intramedullary nail fixation of a three-part humeral head fracture model

The aim of this study was the dynamic biomechanical evaluation of a ready-to-use oil-based calcium phosphate cement paste implanted to augment intramedullary nail fixation of a three-part humeral head fracture model. Fractures in the osteoporotic bone are often fractures of the proximal humerus. Secondary fracture displacements due to cut-out in osteoporotic bone have been observed in up to 13% of cases. Procedures have been developed to augment fracture fixation with polymethylmethacrylate to increase stability, but there are still unsolved challenges relating to its material-specific properties. Calcium phosphate cement could be a biological alternative in the augmentation of osteoporotic fractures because of its more favourable material properties. Fracture fixation was performed on eight pairs of human cadaveric bones to stabilize a standardized three-part humeral head fracture model by implantation of the Targon^® PH (Braun-Aesculap AG, Tuttlingen, Germany) intramedullary nail and insertion of three head screws and two bicortical shaft screws. The procedure was randomized, and one bone of each pair received calcium phosphate cement augmentation. Custom-made cannulated screws with an open lateral slot facilitated augmentation, making it possible to cement the threaded portion of the screw (1-mL calcium phosphate cement/screw). After the calcium phosphate cement had hardened, the humeri were subjected to dynamic axial loading. Load was progressively increased, monitored by ultrasound-based motion analysis, and total deformation was recorded. Load testing continued until implant failure. The augmented group withstood significantly more cycles before implant failure. The average initial stiffness showed a significant difference between the two study groups. Ultrasonic sensor technology was used to measure angular displacement during testing and a significant difference was found. Calcium phosphate cement offers a potential alternative to implant augmentation in the treatment of osteoporotic humeral head fractures. Future studies are required to confirm these observations clinically in vivo.

Inter-observer reliability of alternative diagnostic methods for proximal humerus fractures: a comparison between attending surgeons and orthopedic residents in training

Background

Proximal humerus fractures are frequent, and several studies show low diagnostic agreement among the observers, as well as an inaccurate classification of these lesions. The divergences are generally correlated with the experience of the surgeons as well as the diagnostic methods used. This paper challenges these problems including alternative diagnostic methods such as 3D models and augmented reality (holography) and including the observers’ period of medical experience as a factor.

Methods

Twenty orthopedists (ten experts in shoulder surgery and ten experts in traumatology) and thirty resident physicians in orthopedics classified nine proximal humerus fractures randomly distributed as x-ray, tomographies, 3D models and holography, using AO/ASIF and Neer’s classification. In the end, we evaluated the intra- and inter-observer agreement between diagnostic methods and whether the experience of the observers interfered in the evaluations and the classifications used.

Results

We found overall kappa coefficients ranging from 0.241 (fair) to 0.624 (substantial) between the two classifications (AO / ASIF and Neer), concerning the diagnostic methods used. We identified image modality differences (p = 0.017), where 3D models presented an average kappa coefficient value superior to that of tomographies. There were no differences between kappa scores for x-ray and holography compared to the others. The kappa scores for AO / ASIF classification and Neer classification and subdivided by observer period of experience showed no differences concerning the diagnostic method used.

Conclusions

3D models can substantially improve diagnostic agreement for proximal humerus fractures evaluation among experts or resident physicians. The holography showed good agreement between the experts and can be a similar option to x-ray and tomography in the evaluation and classification of these fractures. The observers’ period of experience did not improve the diagnostic agreement between the image modalities studied.

Trial registration

Registered in the Brazil Platform under no. CAAE 88912318.1.0000.5487.

High risk for revision after shoulder arthroplasty for failed osteosynthesis of proximal humeral fractures

Background and purpose - It is unclear whether previous osteosynthesis is a risk factor for inferior outcome following shoulder arthroplasty for a proximal humeral fracture. We used data from the Danish Shoulder Arthroplasty Registry (DSR) to examine this question. Patients and methods - All 285 patients treated with a shoulder arthroplasty after failed osteosynthesis of a proximal humeral fracture reported to DSR from 2006 to 2013 were included. Each case was matched with 2 controls (570) treated with a primary shoulder arthroplasty for an acute proximal humeral fracture. Patient reported outcome was assessed using the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder index (WOOS) and the relative risk of revision was reported. Results - The mean WOOS was 46 (SD 25) for a shoulder arthroplasty after failed osteosynthesis and 52 (27) after a primary shoulder arthroplasty. The relative risk of revision for a shoulder arthroplasty after failed osteosynthesis was 2 with a primary arthroplasty for fracture as reference. In a separate analysis of patients treated by locking plate the mean WOOS was 46 (24), with a relative risk of revision at 1.5 with a primary arthroplasty as reference. Interpretation - Compared with primary arthroplasty for proximal humeral fracture, we found an inferior patient-reported outcome and a substantial risk of revision for patients treated with a shoulder arthroplasty after failed osteosynthesis for a proximal humeral fracture. The risk and burdens of additional surgery should be accounted for when deciding on the primary surgical procedure.

Management of proximal humeral fractures by the Ilizarov external fixator

INTRODUCTION

External fixation can be performed in poor bone and soft tissue conditions, and can be used in patients with poor general conditions or multiple injuries as a rapid, mini-invasive procedure. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the Ilizarov external fixator in the management of proximal humeral fractures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between May 2011 and December 2013, 14 patients with displaced proximal humeral fractures were enrolled in the current study. Nine patients were males and five were females, with mean age 42.9 years (range 21-55). All fractures were acute. The mode of injury was road traffic accident in eight patients and fall in six patients. There were six patients with two-part fracture, one of them with fracture dislocation, and eight patients presented with three-part fracture, two of them with fracture dislocation. All fractures were fixed using the Ilizarov external fixation.

RESULTS

The average operative time was about 67 min (range 50-90). The mean follow-up period was (18) months (range 12-28). Healing was obtained in all 14 patients in a mean of 10.4 weeks (range 8-14). At the final follow-up, the mean constant score was 73.1 points (range 60-97 points), the mean visual analog score (VAS) for pain 3.2 (range 1-5), the mean DASH score 31.8 points (range 10-55 points), and the mean satisfaction VAS 7.6 (range 4-10).

CONCLUSION

The Ilizarov external fixation is an effective technique in managing proximal humeral fractures with good outcome and low complication rates.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.

Biomechanical assessment and clinical analysis of different intramedullary nailing systems for oblique fractures

The aim of this study is to evaluate the fracture union or non-union for a specific patient that presented oblique fractures in tibia and fibula, using a mechanistic-based bone healing model. Normally, this kind of fractures can be treated through an intramedullary nail using two possible configurations that depends on the mechanical stabilisation: static and dynamic. Both cases are simulated under different fracture geometries in order to understand the effect of the mechanical stabilisation on the fracture healing outcome. The results of both simulations are in good agreement with previous clinical experience. From the results, it is demonstrated that the dynamization of the fracture improves healing in comparison with a static or rigid fixation of the fracture. This work shows the versatility and potential of a mechanistic-based bone healing model to predict the final outcome (union, non-union, delayed union) of realistic 3D fractures where even more than one bone is involved.