Direct anterior Hueter approach is a safe and effective approach to perform a bipolar hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture: outcome in 82 patients

Total blood loss after hip hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture: Anterior versus posterior approach

INTRODUCTION

Femoral neck fractures constitute a public health problem due to significant associated morbidity and mortality amongst the ageing population. Perioperative blood loss can increase this morbidity. Blood loss, as well as the influence that the surgical approach exerts on it, remains poorly evaluated. We therefore conducted a retrospective comparative study in order to: (1) compare total blood loss depending on whether the patients were operated on using an anterior or posterior approach, (2) compare the transfusion rates, operating times and hospital stays between these two groups and, (3) analyze dislocation rates.

HYPOTHESIS

Total blood loss is greater from an anterior approach following a hip hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture, compared to the posterior approach.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective single-center comparative study included 137 patients operated on by hip hemiarthroplasty between December 2020 and June 2021, and seven patients were excluded. One hundred and thirty patients were analyzed: 69 (53.1%) had been operated on via the anterior Hueter approach (AA) and 61 (46.9%) via the posterior Moore approach (PA). The analysis of total blood loss was based on the OSTHEO formula to collect perioperative "hidden" blood loss. The risk of early dislocation (less than 6 months) was also analyzed.

RESULTS

Total blood loss was similar between the two groups, AA: 1626±506mL versus PA: 1746±692mL (p=0.27). The transfusion rates were also similar between the two groups, AA: 23.2% versus PA: 31.1% (p=0.31) as well as the duration of hospitalization, AA: 8.5±3.2 versus PA: 8.2±3.3 days (p=0.54). The operating time was shorter in the PA group (Δ=10.3±14.1minutes [p<0.001]) with a greater risk of early dislocation when the patient was operated on by PA with AA: 9.8% versus PA: 1.4% (p=0.03).

CONCLUSION

This study does not demonstrate any influence of the approach (anterior or posterior) on total blood loss. Transfusion rates and length of hospitalization were similar between the groups with a slightly shorter operating time but a greater risk of early dislocations after posterior hemiarthroplasty in a population at high anesthesia-related risk.

LEVEL OF PROOF

III, comparative study of continuous series.

Incidence of dislocation and associated risk factors in patients with a femoral neck fracture operated with an uncemented hemiarthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Several factors might be associated with risk of dislocating following uncemented hemiarthroplasty (HA) due to femoral neck fracture (FNF). Current evidence is limited with great variance in reported incidence of dislocation (1-15%). Aim of this study was to identify the cumulative incidence of first-time dislocation following HA and to identify the associated risk factors.

METHOD

We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients receiving an HA (BFX Biomet stem, posterior approach) at Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg, in 2010-2016. Patients were followed until death or end of study (dec 2018). Dislocation was identified by code extraction from the Danish National Patient Registry. Variables included in the multivariate model were defined pre-analysis to include: age, sex and variables with a p-value < 0.1 in univariate analysis. A regression model was fitted for 90 days dislocation as the assumption of proportional hazard rate (HR) was not met here after.

RESULTS

We identified 772 stems (some patients occurred with both right and left hip) and 58 stems suffered 90 dislocations during the observation period, resulting in a 7% (CI 5-9) incidence of dislocation 90 days after index surgery. 55 of the 58 stems (95%) experienced the first dislocation within 90 days after surgery. Only absence of dementia was identified as an independent protective factor in the cause-specific model (HR 0.46 (CI 0.23-0.89)) resulting in a 2.4-fold cumulative risk of experiencing a dislocation in case of dementia. Several other variables such as age, sex, various medical conditions, surgery delay and surgical experience were eliminated as statistical risk factors. We found a decrease in survival probability for patients who experienced a dislocation during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of first-time dislocation of HA (BFX Biomet stem, posterior approach) in patients with a hip fracture is found to be 7% 90 days after surgery. Due to the non-existing attribution bias, we claim it to be the true incidence. Dementia was among several variables identified as the only risk factor for dislocation. In perspective, we may consider treating patients with dementia by other methods than HA e.g., HA with cement or with a more constrained solution. Also, a surgical approach that reduce the risk of dislocation should be considered.

Complication rates after direct anterior vs posterior approach for hip hemiarthroplasty in elderly individuals with femoral neck fractures

BACKGROUND

Dislocation rates after hemiarthroplasty reportedly vary from 1% to 17%. This serious complication is associated with increased morbidity and mortality rates. Approaches to this surgery are still debated, with no consensus regarding the superiority of any single approach.

AIM

To compare early postoperative complications after implementing the direct anterior and posterior approaches (PL) for hip hemiarthroplasty after femoral neck fractures.

METHODS

This is a comparative, retrospective, single-center cohort study conducted at a university hospital. Between March 2008 and December 2018, 273 patients (a total of 280 hips) underwent bipolar hemiarthroplasties (n = 280) for displaced femoral neck fractures using either the PL (n = 171) or the minimally invasive direct anterior approach (DAA) (n = 109). The choice of approach was related to the surgeons' practices; the implant types were similar and unrelated to the approach. Dislocation rates and other complications were reviewed after a minimum follow-up of 6 mo.

RESULTS

Both treatment groups had similarly aged patients (mean age: 82 years), sex ratios, patient body mass indexes, and patient comorbidities. Surgical data (surgery delay time, operative time, and blood loss volume) did not differ significantly between the groups. The 30 d mortality rate was higher in the PL group (9.9%) than in the DAA group (3.7%), but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.052). Among the one-month survivors, a significantly higher rate of dislocation was observed in the PL group (14/154; 9.1%) than in the DAA group (0/105; 0%) (P = 0.002). Of the 14 patients with dislocation, 8 underwent revision surgery for recurrent instability (posterior group), and one of them had 2 additional procedures due to a deep infection. The rate of other complications (e.g., perioperative and early postoperative periprosthetic fractures and infection-related complications) did not differ significantly between the groups.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that the DAA to bipolar hemiarthroplasty for patients with femoral neck fractures is associated with a lower dislocation rate (< 1%) than the PL.

Complications and early recovery following hip hemiarthroplasty through the direct anterior approach: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Minimizing complications is an important focus in hip hemiarthroplasty (HHA) for femoral neck fracture (FNF) patients given the associated high morbidity and mortality rates. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the clinical and functional outcomes associated with the direct anterior approach (DAA) compared to other surgical approaches used for HHA.

METHODS

Studies evaluating HHA-treated FNFs using the DAA were compared through meta-analysis to all other surgical approaches combined and as distinct subgroups. Outcomes included overall complication rate, mortality rate, dislocation rate, reoperation rate, periprosthetic fracture rate, infection rate, length of stay (LOS), mobility, perioperative blood loss, operative time, and postoperative pain.

RESULTS

Nineteen studies met the inclusion criteria, totaling 2,018 HHAs. DAA significantly reduced the overall complication rate (odds ratio (OR) = 0.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57 to 0.94, p = 0.01), dislocation rate (OR = 0.34, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.77, p = 0.01), and LOS (mean difference (MD) = -1.31 days, 95% CI  - 2.12 to  - 0.50, p = 0.002). Findings from studies that were not appropriate for meta-analysis were qualitatively summarized and suggested improved mobility and reduced postoperative pain with the DAA. Significant differences were not detected in any of the remaining outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The DAA HHA appears to be safer, reduces hospital stay, and may improve early functional recovery. This article supports the DAA HHA as a safe option for the management of displaced intracapsular FNFs.

Does Surgical Approach Influence Complication Rate of Hip Hemiarthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fractures? A Literature Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Femoral neck fractures are an epidemiologically significant issue with major effects on patients and health care systems, as they account for a large percentage of bone injuries in the elderly. Hip hemiarthroplasty is a common surgical procedure in the treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures. Several surgical approaches may be used to access the hip joint in case of femoral neck fractures, each with its own benefits and potential drawbacks, but none of them has consistently been found to be superior to the others. This article aims to systematically review and compare the different approaches in terms of the complication rate at the last follow-up. Methods: an in-depth search on PubMed/Scopus/Web of Science databases and a cross-referencing search was carried out concerning the articles comparing different approaches in hemiarthroplasty and reporting detailed data. Results: A total of 97,576 hips were included: 1030 treated with a direct anterior approach, 4131 with an anterolateral approach, 59,110 with a direct lateral approach, and 33,007 with a posterolateral approach. Comparing the different approaches, significant differences were found in both the overall complication rate and the rate of revision surgery performed (p < 0.05). In particular, the posterolateral approach showed a significantly higher complication rate than the lateral approach (8.4% vs. 3.2%, p < 0.001). Furthermore, the dislocation rate in the posterolateral group was significantly higher than in the other three groups considered (p < 0.026). However, the posterolateral group showed less blood loss than the anterolateral group (p < 0.001), a lower intraoperative fractures rate than the direct anterior group (p < 0.035), and shorter mean operative time than the direct lateral group (p < 0.018). Conclusions: The posterolateral approach showed a higher complication rate than direct lateral approach and a higher prosthetic dislocation rate than the other three types of surgical approaches. On the other hand, patients treated with posterolateral approach showed better outcomes in other parameters considered, such as mean operative time, mean blood loss and intraoperative fractures rate. The knowledge of the limitations of each approach and the most common associated complications can lead to choosing a surgical technique based on the patient's individual risk.

Direct Anterior Approach Provides Superior Prosthesis Adaptability in the Early Postoperative Period of Total Hip Arthroplasty

OBJECTIVES

Prosthesis awareness is the perception of foreign bodies, which has a critical effect on the function of the prosthetic joint. In total hip arthroplasty (THA), the direct anterior approach (DAA) has more advantages than the posterior approach (PA), including superior rehabilitation outcomes. This study was to evaluate the recovery of "prosthesis awareness" through these two approaches.

METHODS

Three hundred and seventy-six patients who received THA with either DAA (n = 41) or PA (n = 335) from January 2016 to December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. The Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12), Harris hip score (HHS), and visual analog scale (VAS) analyses were used to evaluate the recovery of "prosthesis awareness" in these patients 2 weeks, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. The student t-test, Wilcoxon rank sum test, chi-square test, and MANOVA were used to compare the differences among groups.

RESULTS

We found that DAA patients had higher FJS-12 scores than PA patients at 2 weeks (42.15 ± 3.36 vs. 38.09 ± 3.28, p = 0.042), 1 month (49.06 ± 5.14 vs. 41.11 ± 5.21, p = 0.038), and 3 months (53.23 ± 4.07 vs. 48.09 ± 3.71, t = 3.152, p = 0.045). And the recovery rates of FJS-12 scores in DAA and PA groups at 2 weeks, 1 month, and 3 months after surgery were 75.46% ± 6.04%, 84.05% ± 6.57%, 91.37% ± 7.13%, and 74.14% ± 5.54%, 78.16% ± 6.01%, 88.23% ± 6.42%, respectively. To compare the recovery effects of the two procedures in more detail, we classified the 12 items in FJS-12 that evaluate different types of gravity center motions into three categories: low-movement group (LG), middle-movement group (MG), and high-movement group (HG). Interestingly, DAA patients had significantly higher HG than PA patients at 2 weeks, 1 month, and 3 months after operation (t = 3.225, p = 0.022 at 2 weeks, t = 3.081, p = 0.041 at 1 month and t = 2.783, p = 0.046 at 3 months), whereas no significant differences were observed in LG- and MG-related items. In addition, there were no significant differences in HHS and VAS scores between DAA and PA patients at 2 weeks (p = 0.102, p = 0.093), or from 1 month to 12 months (each p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

DAA-mediated THA is superior to PA in terms of prosthesis adaptability and recovery of hip joint motion in the first 3 months after surgery, especially concerning high-movement gravity center motions.

A comparison of different surgical approaches to hemiarthroplasty for the femoral neck fractures: A meta-analysis

There are three traditional surgical approaches to hemiarthroplasty (HA) for femoral neck fractures, respectively, the anterior approach (AA), the lateral approach (LA) and the posterior approach (PA). However, the optimum approach is still controversial, the purpose of this meta-analysis is to identify the merits and demerits of all three approaches. All clinical published studies in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from January 2000 to April 2022 were searched which compared different surgical approaches and covered surgery-related outcomes and frequent complications. Five randomized controlled trials and 26 cohort studies for a total of 31 clinical trials were included in the meta-analysis. The dislocation of PA was significantly higher than LA (OR: 3.00 95% CI: 2.25-4.01 I ² = 27% P < 0.00001) and AA (OR: 6.61 95% CI: 2.28-19.13 I ² = 0% P = 0.0005); PA was substantially more than LA in terms of risk of postoperative reoperation (P < 0.05); meanwhile, AA has markedly shorter hospital length of stays than LA. The remaining items showed no significant differences in the results.The results of this meta-analysis demonstrated that the risk of PA dislocation and reoperation is higher with hemiarthroplasty, and AA has markedly shorter hospital length of stays than LA.

Direct anterior approach improves in-hospital mobility following hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture treatment

INTRODUCTION

In elderly patients, an established treatment for femoral neck fractures is hip hemiarthroplasty (HHA) using the anterolateral approach (ALA). Early postoperative mobilization is crucial to reduce perioperative complications. The direct anterior approach (DAA) has been reported to facilitate early recovery of ambulation and is increasingly popular in elective hip surgery but rarely used in femoral neck fractures. The aim was to compare the outcome of the DAA and the ALA in patients treated for femoral neck fracture.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All HHAs with complete data sets were reviewed from a tertiary public healthcare institution (2013-2020). Propensity score matching was applied to compensate for possible confounders; outcome parameters were perioperative blood loss, postoperative mobility and pain. Secondary outcomes were duration of surgery, length of stay (LOS), complications, reoperation and mortality rates.

RESULTS

There were 237 patients (mean age 85.8 years) available for analysis. The DAA group mobilized earlier during hospitalization (outside patient room: 50.6 vs 38.6%, p = 0.01; walking on crutches/walker: 48.1 vs 36.1%, p < 0.01), had shorter surgeries (DAA vs ALA: 72.5 vs 89.5 min, p < 0.001) and a trend towards fewer complications (32.9% vs 44.9%, p = 0.076). Blood loss (286 vs 287 ml), LOS (10.4 vs 9.5 days), pain (cessation of opioid medication: 2.9 vs 3.3 days post-op), revision (2.5 vs 3.2%) or mortality (30-days: 7.6 vs 5.7%) did not differ between patient groups.

CONCLUSIONS

DAA for HHA led to earlier in-hospital mobility, shorter surgeries and a tendency towards fewer complications. No advantage was found regarding perioperative blood loss and pain.

Comparison of Anterior and Lateral Approach in Hip Hemiarthroplasty for Femur Neck Fractures in the Elderly: Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes

Introduction

Many surgical approaches have been described for hip hemiarthroplasty (HHA) treating femur neck fractures (FNFs). Direct lateral approach (DLA) is one of the most used. Today, the direct anterior approach (DAA) has become very attractive, but it seems to involve more intra-operative fractures. Our main endpoint was to demonstrate that the DAA may be a valid alternative comparing to the DLA.

Materials and methods

Patients affected by FNFs and treated with HHA between the years 2016 and 2020 were studied. We divided the treatment of the fractures according to the surgical approach. The analysis was focused on perioperative complications and radiological outcomes.

Results

There were a total of 166 patients. The DLA group included patients with an average age of 83.5 years and the DAA group of 83 years. We found similar surgical times (DLA 67 min vs DAA 61 min; p = 0,55), number of transfusions (DLA 3/person vs DAA 4/person; p = 0,91), perioperative complications (fractures: DLA 0 vs DAA 0 - dislocations: DLA 2,50% vs DAA 0) and functional outcomes (HHS: DLA 83 points vs DAA 87 points; p = 0,71). There were no statistical differences comparing diaphyseal filling (Canal Fill Index at the proximal third: DLA 0,79 vs DAA 0,78; p= 0,24), bone loss (Paprosky I: DLA 96,25% vs DAA 91,86%; p = 0,47) and prevalence of heterotopic ossification (Broker low degree: DLA 93,75% vs 95, 34%; p = 0,87).

Conclusion

Analysing perioperative complications and studying post-operative radiographic evolution, our results suggest that the DAA is a valid alternative to the DLA in HHA treating FNFs.

Direct Anterior Approach in Hip Hemiarthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fractures: Do Short-Term Outcomes Differ with Approach?: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Hip hemiarthroplasty (HA) is commonly used to treat femoral neck fractures, but it remains unclear if the surgical approach impacts patient outcomes for this commonly performed procedure. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess early postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing HA for femoral neck fracture with the direct anterior approach (DAA) compared with other approaches.

METHODS

The Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar databases were searched for randomized controlled trials, prospective nonrandomized trials, and retrospective studies published prior to September 7, 2021, comparing DAA with other approaches (anterolateral approach [ALA], direct lateral approach [DLA], and posterior-based approach [PA]) in HA for femoral neck fractures. This study was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Outcomes included functional outcomes, total complications, prosthetic dislocation, periprosthetic fracture, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), reoperation, mortality, pain, operative time, and perioperative blood loss. Fixed effect odds ratios, along with their 95% confidence intervals, were used to analyze dichotomous variables. Significance was set at p < 0.05. Meta-analysis was conducted with Review Manager 5.4.

RESULTS

In total, 19 studies were included for qualitative analysis and 16 studies were included for quantitative analysis, with a total of 1,604 cases analyzed (723 DAA, 215 ALA, 301 DLA, and 365 PA). Compared with other approaches, the use of the DAA for HA was associated with improved early postoperative functional outcomes, lower early postoperative pain scores, fewer total complications, and fewer prosthetic hip dislocations. The rates of periprosthetic fracture, PJI, and reoperation, pain scores beyond 40 days, operative time, perioperative blood loss, and mortality were not significantly different between surgical approaches.

CONCLUSIONS

Utilizing the DAA while performing HA for femoral neck fractures is associated with improved functional outcomes, lower early postoperative pain scores, lower incidence of prosthetic hip dislocation, and potentially fewer total complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Bipolar hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of femoral neck fractures with minimally invasive anterior approach in elderly

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of hemiarthroplasty with minimally invasive direct anterior approach (DAA) for the treatment of femoral neck fracture in elderly patients. We aimed to compare the DAA and the standard anterolateral approach (ALA), assessing multiple peri‑ and post-operative parameters.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Between December of 2015 and May of 2017, patients operated with medial femoral neck fractures using bipolar hemiarthroplasty with DAA or ALA were evaluated. The volume of bleeding and transfusion, postoperative level of pain, mobilisation and functional outcome were assessed retrospectively.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients between the age of 75 and 85, suffering Garden Type III Pauwels Type III and Garden Type IV medial femoral neck fractures were entered to the study. Patients had no history of anticoagulant therapy; the operation was performed in the first 48 h. All patients received similar postoperative pain management and physiotherapy. The type of implants was determined by the patients' bone morphology and quality.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The outcomes of interest were the level of postoperative pain, blood loss, rate of recovery and physiotherapy, altered gait pattern and accuracy of leg length, related to DAA and ALA techniques.

RESULTS

The 51 patients operated with DAA showed significantly less pain, based on VAS (visual analogue scale), starting of the first postoperative day. Those patients who were subjected to DAA met with the criteria of hospital discharge 1.68 days earlier, compared to ALA patients. The length of leg was accurately set in 21% of ALA vs 54.9% of DAA patients. On the 12th week follow-up, limping was detected only 5.9% of DAA vs 46% of ALA groups. On the postoperative 2nd and 6th weeks, the HHS (Harris Hip Score) was significantly better in patients with DAA, compared to ALA (77 vs 65 and 91 vs 77, p < .05).

CONCLUSION

The bipolar hemiarthroplasty with DAA allows earlier mobilisation, reduced postoperative pain and need for rehabilitation with an overall better functional outcome, compared to ALA. DAA is proven a reliable choice for femoral neck fractures, offering good outcome and faster recovery, similarly to total hip arthroplasties with degenerative arthritis.

Direct anterior versus posterolateral approach for bipolar hip hemiarthroplasty in femoral neck fractures: a prospective randomised study

INTRODUCTION

Femoral neck fractures are a major problem in orthopaedic practice, having a huge impact on society, and involving a large number of elderly patients for whom early recovery is paramount. Thus, the aim of this study was to compare 2 surgical approaches, direct anterior (DA group) versus posterolateral (PL group), used for bipolar hip hemiarthroplasty (BHA) with femoral neck fractures in order to assess pain recovery after surgery. Our hypothesis was that early pain recovery would be faster in the DA group.

METHODS

100 patients were randomised to surgery using either a DA group or PL group approach, and were then followed up for 6 months. Surgical time, intra- and postoperative complications were recorded for each patient. The main outcome, pain, was recorded using an NRS scale at 3 days, 1, 3 and 6 months after surgery. At the same time, patient status was evaluated using Activities of Daily Living and Cumulated Ambulation Score scales.

RESULTS

Surgical time was longer in the DA group (p < 0.0001). Pain perception at 3 days and at 1 month after surgery was significantly lower in DA group patients (p < 0.0001). The results of the other scales were comparable in the 2 groups (at 3 days, 1 and 3 months after surgery).

DISCUSSION

The DA approach offers a significant advantage in terms of pain perception up to 1 month after the operation. Early recovery in terms of pain perception is an important finding. Future studies should explore whether this early pain reduction could translate into a faster rehabilitation programme for an earlier recovery of full function.Clinical trial registration: Protocol 423/CE; Study n. CE 41/15.

Direct Anterior Approach to Total Hip Arthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fractures

Femoral neck fractures are a common injury pattern, especially within the elderly. Replacement with either hemiarthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty allows for immediate weight-bearing. This video demonstrates the direct anterior approach to total hip arthroplasty for management of displaced femoral neck fractures.

Risk Factors with Multilevel Evidence for Dislocation in Patients with Femoral Neck Fractures After Hip Hemiarthroplasty: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Hip hemiarthroplasty (HA) is a standard surgical procedure for elderly patients with displaced fracture of the femoral neck, where dislocation is a possible complication. This study is a systematic review on the risk factors of implant dislocation in patients with femoral neck fracture following hip hemiarthroplasty (HA), and evaluates the methodological quality of the included studies.

METHODS

Studies on risk factor assessment of dislocation following hip HA were sourced from EMBASE, Ovid, PubMed and ScienceDirect databases. The quality of included studies was evaluated using an improved quality evaluation method combined with a best-evidence synthesis method.

RESULTS

A total of 130,127 patients were involved in 17 observational studies included in this systematic review, with a dislocation rate that ranged between 0.76 and 12.2% (overall incidence was 4-5% by meta-analysis). According to the applied quality evaluation criteria, eight studies were considered to be of high quality, six to be of medium quality, and three to be of low quality. The posterolateral surgical approach was identified as the only risk factor supported by strong evidence, while patients with small acetabular coverage and low postoperative offset were identified as risk factors supported by moderate evidence, and 11 other risk factors were supported by limited evidence.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review provides some evidence in helping surgeons develop optimal prevention strategies for dislocation following hip HA during the perioperative period based on common risk factors identified in the literature. However, conclusive evidence supporting most of these risk factors is lacking and more methodologically rigorous studies are required to increase the confidence of recommendations.

Direct anterior versus posterolateral approaches for clinical outcomes after total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The main objective of our study was to compare the intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of direct anterior approach (DAA) with posterolateral approaches (PLA).

METHODS

We searched Cochrane library, Web of Science, and PubMed for literatures comparing DAA with PLA. On the basis of inclusion and exclusion criteria, relevant literatures were selected. Two members independently screened qualified literatures, evaluated the literature quality, and extracted data information.

RESULTS

Eighteen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs totaling 34,873 patients (DAA = 9636, PLA = 25237) were contained in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The results showed that DAA were reduced in terms of length of hospital stay (weighted mean difference (WMD) = -0.43, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.78 to -0.09, P = 0.01), LLD (WMD = -2.00, 95% CI -2.75 to -1.25, P < 0.00001), PE/DVT (WMD = 0.36, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.85, P = 0.02), dislocation (WMD = 0.42, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.59, P < 0.00001) and visual analog scale (VAS) (WMD = -0.57, 95% CI -0.91 to -0.23, P = 0.0009) compared with PLA; however, DAA compared with the PLA was increasing in terms of operative time (WMD = 14.81, 95% CI 7.18 to 22.44, P = 0.0001), intraoperative blood loss (WMD = 105.13, 95% CI 25.35 to 184.90, P = 0.01), fracture (WMD = 1.46, 95% CI 1.00 to 2.11, P = 0.05), and Harris hip score (HHS) (WMD = 1.19, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.61, P < 0.00001).

CONCLUSIONS

DAA was preferable effectiveness to PLA in early pain relief and functional recovery; however, PLA has a shorter operation time, intraoperative less blood loss and fracture.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registration ID, CRD42020151208.

Anterior approach without traction table: A means of saving time and money in hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture? A case-matched study with and without traction table

BACKGROUND

The costs incurred by management of displaced femoral neck fracture are a public health issue. The anterior approach can be used for partial hip replacement, but costs in terms of equipment and time incurred by using a traction table have not to our knowledge been estimated in this indication. We therefore performed a case-control study, comparing (1) installation and deinstallation times (IT, DT) in partial hip replacement using a standard versus a traction table (ST, TT), and (2) operating times, limb-length radiography and intraoperative complications.

HYPOTHESIS

Performing the anterior approach on a standard table saves installation and deinstallation time and operating time, without leading to more intraoperative complications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A comparative retrospective study included 102 patients (mean age, 84.8±8 years; 46 ST, 56 TT). Installation time (IT) was calculated between entry in the operating room and performance of the incision; operating time (OT) between incision and closure; and deinstallation time (DT) between closure and leaving the operating room.

RESULTS

Mean IT in ST (25.5±6.2min) was significantly shorter than in TT (33.9±6.2min) (p=1.1*10^-9), as were DT (13±4.7 versus 17±3.4min) (p=4.1*10^-6) and OT (73.5±15.9 versus 82.6±21.3minutes) (p=0.01). There were 4 intraoperative complications: 1 greater trochanter fracture in ST and 2 greater trochanter fractures and 1 proximal femoral fracture in TT. Limb-length discrepancy was comparable between ST (3.7±3.2mm (range, 0-15mm)) and TT (5.3±4.6mm (range, 0-20mm)) (p=0.06).

DISCUSSION

Patient installation on a standard table reduced installation, deinstallation and operating time compared to use of a traction table, without increasing the complications rate.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, case-control study.

Promising outcomes of hip mosaicplasty by minimally invasive anterior approach using osteochondral autografts from the ipsilateral femoral head

PURPOSE

Recent studies demonstrated promising results of mosaicplasty for femoral head osteochondral lesions using posterior and lateral approaches. This study aimed to evaluate outcomes of mosaicplasty using ipsilateral femoral head autografts by minimally invasive anterior approach. The hypothesis was that this surgical technique would grant satisfactory clinical outcomes with considerable improvement of clinical scores.

METHODS

A consecutive series of 27 mosaicplasties, to treat osteochondral lesions of the femoral head measuring 1.6 ± 0.7 cm² (range 0.8-4.0) in patients aged 28.7 ± 7.4 years (range 19-44), was evaluated using the mHHS and WOMAC scores at minimum follow-up of 12 months. All patients were operated by minimally invasive anterior (Hueter) approach and osteochondral plugs were harvested from the non-weight-bearing portion of the femoral head. Adjuvant osteoplasty was necessary for some patients at the acetabulum (n = 3), femur (n = 14) or both (n = 2).

RESULTS

Three patients were excluded due to concomitant periacetabular osteotomies or shelf procedures, one patient could not be reached, and another was revised to THA. This left 22 patients for clinical assessment at 39.4 ± 23.2 months (12.0-90.2). Their mHHS improved from 56.3 ± 12.6 to 88.4 ± 9.9, and WOMAC improved from 45.1 ± 16.9 to 80.6 ± 13.0. Two patients (8.4%) underwent arthroscopy at 13 and 30 months to remove painful residual cam-type deformities. Regression analyses revealed that net improvement in WOMAC decreased with lesion size (p = 0.002) and increased with follow-up (p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Hip mosaicplasty using autografts from the ipsilateral femoral head, performed by minimally invasive anterior approach, granted satisfactory outcomes and functional improvements. Caution is, however, advised for lesions > 2 cm² (diameter > 16 mm) which may be a threshold limit for this procedure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, Case series.

Clinical Practice Guidelines in Action: Differences in Femoral Neck Fracture Management by Trauma and Arthroplasty Training

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to survey trauma and arthroplasty surgeons to investigate associations between subspecialty training and management of geriatric femoral neck fractures and to compare treatments with the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons clinical practice guidelines.

METHODS

Five hundred fifty-six surgeons completed the online survey consisting of two sections: (1) surgeon demographics and (2) two geriatric hip fracture cases with questions regarding treatment decisions.

RESULTS

In both clinical scenarios, arthroplasty surgeons were more likely than trauma surgeons to recommend total hip arthroplasty (THA) (case 1: 96% versus 84%; case 2: 29% versus 10%; P ≤ 0.02) and spinal anesthesia (case 1: 70% versus 40%; case 2: 62% versus 38%; P < 0.01). Surgeons who have made changes based on clinical practice guidelines (n = 96; 21% of surveyed) cited more use of THA (n = 56; 58% of respondents) and cemented stems (n = 28; 29% of respondents).

CONCLUSION

Arthroplasty surgeons are more likely to recommend THA over hemiarthroplasty and have a higher expectation for spinal anesthesia for the management of geriatric femoral neck fractures.

Risk factors for prolonged operative time in femoral neck fracture patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty through direct anterior approach

BACKGROUND

The use of direct anterior approach (DAA) for hemiarthroplasty in femoral neck fracture patients has recently increased worldwide. However, no previous studies have elucidated or validated risk factors for prolonged operative time in hemiarthroplasty through DAA. Accurately predicting operative time would contribute to and the selection of the most appropriate surgical approach for each patient and the effective use of operating room.

METHODS

Data from 151 femoral neck fracture patients who underwent hemiarthroplasty through DAA were evaluated. A multiple linear regression model of the operative time of hemiarthroplasty was developed, including age, sex, body mass index (BMI), surgeons' DAA experience and approach depth (cm) on the axial computed tomography (CT) slice of the hip as independent factors.

RESULTS

Mean age at admission was 83.8 [±6.3 standard deviation (SD)] years and mean operative time was 93.1 (±21 SD) min. Operative time increased by 20 min for every 1 cm increase in approach depth [partial regression coefficient (B), 20.4; standardized partial regression coefficient (β), 0.68; p < 0.001] and increased 13 min when the DAA was performed by a surgeon with DAA experience of <20 cases (B, 13.1; β, 0.29; p < 0.001). The adjusted R² of the model was 0.57.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated that increased approach depth and surgeons' DAA experience (<20 cases) are novel risk factors for prolonged operative time in femoral neck fracture patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty through DAA. Surgeons should consider these factors when estimating the operative time of surgery and selecting the most appropriate and safe surgical approach for a patient undergoing hemiarthroplasty.

Surgical Approaches and Hemiarthroplasty Outcomes for Femoral Neck Fractures: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The lateral approach (LA), posterior approach (PA), and anterior approach (AA) are conventional surgical access routes for hemiarthroplasty in proximal femoral fractures. This meta-analysis assesses and compares the outcomes and attempts to identify the best approach for hemiarthroplasty in the treatment of proximal femoral fractures.

METHODS

An electronic search was performed from inception to October 25, 2017, for comparative studies including at least 2 of the conventional approaches. Outcomes including operation time, surgical blood loss, perioperative fractures, wound infections, dislocations, and hospital length of stay were plotted in forest plots.

RESULTS

Twenty-one eligible studies were selected including 3 randomized, controlled trials, 7 prospective and 11 retrospective cohort studies. The odds ratio (OR) for dislocations was significantly higher for the PA compared with the AA (OR, 2.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.26 to 5.43; P = .01) and the LA (OR, 2.90; 95% CI, 1.63 to 5.14; P = .0003). The PA had a higher risk of reoperation compared to the AA (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.12 to 1.41; P < .0001). No significant differences were found concerning perioperative fractures, wound infections, and hospital length of stay. Some studies suggest a better short-term functional outcome using the AA compared to the PA.

CONCLUSION

The PA for hemiarthroplasty in proximal femoral fractures poses an increased risk of dislocation and reoperation compared to the LA and AA. There are no evident advantages of the PA and its routine use for fracture-related hemiarthroplasty should be questioned.

Comparison of dual mobility total hip arthroplasty and bipolar arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures: A retrospective case-control study of 199 hips

BACKGROUND

The choice between performing total hip arthroplasty (THA) or hemiarthroplasty (HA) is not straightforward in older patients with femoral neck fracture, particularly when co-morbidities are factored in. This led us to carry out a case-control study to determine (1) the rate of mechanical complications for these two types of implants, and (2) the rate of medical complications and mortality.

HYPOTHESIS

THA with dual mobility cup (DM) will result in fewer mechanical complications than HA.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a single-center, retrospective case-control study. Between 2010 and 2015, all patients with a femoral neck fracture treated by HA or DM THA were included. The primary outcome was the occurrence of any type of surgical complication. The Charlson Co-morbidity Index (CCI) and the independence during Activities of Daily Living (ADL) score were calculated for every patient. Two subgroups of patients were made based on whether they met frailty criteria. The effect of covariates on 1-year mortality was controlled using Cox's proportional hazards regression model.

RESULTS

The cohort consisted of 101 HA and 98 THA procedures in 193 patients (139 women, 54 men) with a mean age of 80.6years (range, 76-101). The mean follow-up was 24.2months (range, 0-83) with a median of 14.5months. Fifteen of the HA hips (15%) had surgical complication, of which 10 were posterior dislocations (10%). Ten patients in the HA cohort had a serious medical complication (10%). Ten of the THA hips (10%) had a mechanical complication, including three posterior dislocations (3%) and four infections (4%). Nine patients in the THA cohort had a medical complication (9%). There were significantly fewer posterior dislocations in the THA hips (p = 0.05). In the subgroup analysis, the 117 patients (58%) who met the frailty criteria had a significantly lower dislocation rate after undergoing THA (p = 0.048). After adjusting on age, ADL and CCI score, the dislocation rate no longer differed significantly between the two groups (p = 0.1). The dislocation rate was lower in the THA hips only in the "frail" patients (Odds ratio = 0.137, 95% CI: [0.003-0.97] (p = 0.04)). There was no difference in the dislocation rate in the "non-frail" patients. The overall 1-year mortality was 85% [95% CI: 78-94%]. It was 78% [95% CI: 69-86%] for the HA hips and 88% [95% CI: 82-95%] for the THA hips (p = 0.01). After factoring in the impact of age, CCI and ADL, the differences in the 1-year mortality between HA and THA were no longer present (p = 0.42). Thus, there is no increased risk of mortality in THA patients.

DISCUSSION

When the CCI and independence level are taken into consideration, the frailest patients can undergo DM THA to reduce the dislocation risk, without increasing the mortality rate at 1year. Patients who are not frail will benefit equally from undergoing HA or THA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, case-control study.

The Direct Anterior Approach Does Not Increase Return to Function Following Hemiarthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fracture

The purpose of this study was to evaluate functional outcomes for hemiarthroplasty using a direct anterior approach or a direct lateral approach for femoral neck fracture. This retrospective review used data collected from a single institution between 2006 and 2016. Eighty-five and 75 consecutive patients who underwent hemiarthroplasty via a direct anterior approach and a direct lateral approach, respectively, met inclusion criteria. All patients with femoral neck fractures were treated by 1 of 2 fellowship-trained orthopedic surgeons using the direct anterior approach or the direct lateral approach to hemiarthroplasty. Disposition, ambulation, and other perioperative surgical outcomes were compared between the cohorts. Compared with the direct lateral cohort, the direct anterior cohort had a shorter mean operative time (2.4 minutes, P<.01), a shorter mean length of hospital stay (2.7 days, P<.01), and a smaller mean decrease in hemoglobin postoperatively (0.7 g/dL, P<.01). No significant difference was observed between the cohorts for postoperative disposition, the number of feet ambulated on the second postoperative day, or the prevalence of ambulatory decline at 4- to 6-week and 4- to 6-month follow-up visits. Compared with the direct lateral approach, the direct anterior approach may benefit patients by small, but statistically significant, improvements in blood loss, surgical time, and length of hospital stay after hemiarthroplasty. However, the direct anterior approach does not appear to decrease the likelihood of transfer to a skilled nursing facility postoperatively or accelerate return to preoperative function. [Orthopedics. 2017; 40(6):e1055-e1061.].

Evidence based management of intracapsular neck of femur fractures

Neck of femur fractures are occurring at an increased incidence. Functionally independent patients without cognitive impairment can expect reasonable life expectancy. This indicates the need for a durable surgical option that optimises the chance to return to pre-injury functional status, with minimal risk of complications and reoperation. Most fractures are displaced. Surgical options include internal fixation, hemiarthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty (THA). Evidence is conclusive that arthroplasty options outperform internal fixation in terms of function, quality of life and reoperation rates. In anyone other than young patients where head preserving surgery is required, arthroplasty is the standard of care. Hemiarthroplasty is the heavily favoured arthroplasty option for surgeons. However, in patients other than the extreme elderly, medically infirm, neurologically impaired, or with little or no ambulatory capacity, the evidence to support hemiarthroplasty is lacking. In functionally independent patients without cognitive impairment, THA should be considered the gold standard, producing better functional and quality of life outcomes, lower reoperation rates and better cost effectiveness, with no difference in complications or mortality. An increased risk of dislocation does exist. This may be reduced with modern surgical technique and implant options. Low amounts of research have been afforded to undisplaced fractures. For this fracture type, surgery is the standard of care. Despite a higher risk of reoperation, internal fixation is the preferred option for all age groups. Further study is required to identify the difference between internal fixation and THA, in particular, for unstable fracture patterns in elderly patients.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the direct anterior approach for hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture

BACKGROUND

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess whether the direct anterior approach (DAA) is associated with improved functional and clinical outcomes compared to other surgical approaches for hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Randomized trials and cohort studies of hemiarthroplasty performed via DAA versus another surgical approach (anterolateral, lateral, posterolateral, posterior) were included. Our primary outcome was postoperative functional mobility. Secondary outcomes included overall complication rate, dislocation rate, perioperative fracture, infection rate, re-operation rate, overall mortality, operative time, pain, intra-operative blood loss, and length of stay.

RESULTS

Nine studies met inclusion criteria, comprising a total of 698 hips (330 direct anterior, 57 anterolateral, 89 lateral, 114 posterolateral, 108 posterior approach). With regard to functional mobility, DAA was favored in 4 studies, and no study favored another approach over DAA. DAA had a significantly lower dislocation rate compared to posterior capsular approaches. Analysis of other secondary outcomes did not identify statistically significant differences.

CONCLUSION

This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis of the DAA for hemiarthroplasty. Available evidence suggests superior early functional mobility with the DAA. The DAA is associated with a significantly lower dislocation rate compared to posterior capsular approaches for hemiarthroplasty.

Direct Anterior Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty in the Lateral Decubitus Position: Our Experiences and Early Results

BACKGROUND

The direct anterior approach (DAA) for total hip arthroplasty (THA) is typically performed in the supine position using a specially designed operating room table, which makes this approach more accessible to orthopedic surgeons. We attempted to perform this procedure in the lateral decubitus position on an ordinary operation table to avoid dependence on a special operating room table. There is an obvious absence of literature regarding this subject.

METHODS

A total of 248 patients (295 hips) were recruited for primary THAs from July 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014. In total, 126 hips (42.7%) underwent THAs using the DAA in the lateral decubitus position. The technical feasibility and early results were evaluated.

RESULTS

The orientation of the acetabular component was 16.5° ± 4.9° anteversion and 43.3° ± 3.5° abduction. Intraoperative proximal femoral fracture occurred in one hip. The superficial wound complications occurred in 2 hips and the hematoma in one hip while in hospital. The lateral femoral cutaneous nerve injury was noted in 43 hips. The early dislocation occurred in 2 hips. Heterotopic ossification was Brooker class I in 5 hips and class II in 1 hip. No aseptic loosening, postoperative periprosthetic fracture, and deep infection occurred in our series.

CONCLUSION

The DAA for THA in the lateral decubitus position may be a valuable alternative if the DAA in the supine position is difficult to implement owing to absence of a special operating room table. This technique also seems to provide satisfactory clinical and radiographic outcomes with an acceptable complication in our early follow-up.

Disorder-related risk factors for revision total hip arthroplasty after hip hemiarthroplasty in displaced femoral neck fracture patients: a nationwide population-based cohort study

Background

The choice of primary hip hemiarthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fracture is still controversial. Revision hip arthroplasty not only increases risk and cost but also could result in worse outcome. Determining the risk factors for revision can help inform medical decision-making and aid in risk stratification of publicly reported outcomes. Therefore, we conducted a nationwide population-based study to identify the disease-related risk factors and construct a risk score nomogram to predict revision surgery.

Methods

Records of all 68,030 femoral neck fracture patients receiving partial hemiarthroplasty (HA) in 2000–2010, with no total hip arthroplasty (THA) or revision HA history, were collected from the National Health Insurance Research Database. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to estimate the risk of revision hip replacement (RHA). The score of each risk factor was the quotient of the regression coefficient of the variable by the regression coefficient for a 10-year increase in age. The predictive accuracy was tested using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).

Results

The revision risk for hemiarthroplasty increased in male, those with schizophrenia and end-stage renal disease patients had 1.58-, 1.88-, and 1.74-fold revision HA risk (95 % confidence interval (CI) = 1.40–1.78, 1.26–2.79, and 1.29–2.34, respectively). In a predictive model, the cumulative risk score ranged from 0 to 13 with a 5.08 to 91.82 % 10-year predicted RHA risk. The percentage of AUROC for 10-year RHA risk in nomogram was 61.9 (95 % CI = 60.0–63.4).

Conclusions

Males, schizophrenia and end-stage renal disease patients have higher risk of revision surgery after hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture.