1
|
Liu L, Li J, Wang Y, Li X, Han P, Li X. Different modalities of patellar management in primary total knee arthroplasty: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Orthop Surg Res 2024; 19:74. [PMID: 38233873 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-04546-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 01/19/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The primary management modalities for the patella in TKA include patellar resurfacing, patellar non-resurfacing, patellar resurfacing with denervation, and patellar non-resurfacing with denervation. Traditionally, meta-analyses have predominantly focused on examining comparisons between two management modalities. However, this study performed a network meta-analysis to compare all four patellar management interventions to identify the most optimal approach for patellar management in TKA. METHODS A computer-based search of PubMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), The Cochrane Library, Web of science, Embase, and MEDLINE databases was performed to identify randomized controlled trials focusing on the four management interventions for the patella in TKA. Comparisons included two-by-two comparisons as well as those involving more than two concurrent comparisons. The search timeframe spanned from inception to June 30, 2023. Two independent authors extracted the data and evaluated the quality of the literature. The Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias (ROB) tool was used to evaluate the overall quality of the literature. Subsequently, a network meta-analysis was conducted using the "gemtc" package of the R-4.2.3 software. Outcome measures such as anterior knee pain (AKP), reoperation rate, and patient satisfaction rate were evaluated using odd ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Additionally, the knee society score (KSS), function score (FS), and range of motion (ROM) were evaluated using mean differences (MD) with associated 95% CI. The different treatment measures were ranked using the surfaces under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRA). RESULTS A total of 50 randomized controlled trials involving 9,283 patients were included in the analysis. The findings from this network meta-analysis revealed that patellar resurfacing exhibited significantly lower postoperative reoperation rate (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.24-0.63) and AKP (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.32-1) compared to non-resurfacing. Additionally, patellar resurfacing exhibited higher postoperative KSS clinical scores in comparison with non-resurfacing (MD: 1.13, 95% CI 0.18-2.11). However, for postoperative FS, ROM, and patient satisfaction, no significant differences were observed among the four management interventions. CONCLUSION Patellar resurfacing emerges as the optimal management modality in primary TKA. However, future studies should aim to reduce sources of heterogeneity and minimize the influence of confounding factors on outcomes. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023434418 identifier: CRD42023434418.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lun Liu
- Department of Orthopaedics, The Second People's Hospital of Changzhi City, No. 83, Heping West Street, Changzhi, 046000, Shanxi, China
- Graduate School, Changzhi Medical College, No. 161, Jiefang East Street, Changzhi, 046000, Shanxi, China
| | - Juebei Li
- Graduate School, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, No. 13, Hangkong Road, Wuhan, 430000, Hubei, China
| | - Yunlu Wang
- Department of Orthopaedics, The Second People's Hospital of Changzhi City, No. 83, Heping West Street, Changzhi, 046000, Shanxi, China
- Graduate School, Changzhi Medical College, No. 161, Jiefang East Street, Changzhi, 046000, Shanxi, China
| | - Xiyong Li
- Graduate School, Changzhi Medical College, No. 161, Jiefang East Street, Changzhi, 046000, Shanxi, China
- Department of Orthopaedics, Heping Hospital Affiliated To Changzhi Medical College, No. 110, Yan'an South Road, Changzhi, 046000, Shanxi, China
| | - Pengfei Han
- Department of Orthopaedics, Heping Hospital Affiliated To Changzhi Medical College, No. 110, Yan'an South Road, Changzhi, 046000, Shanxi, China.
| | - Xiaodong Li
- Department of Orthopaedics, The Second People's Hospital of Changzhi City, No. 83, Heping West Street, Changzhi, 046000, Shanxi, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Srivastava AK. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Clinical Practice Guideline Summary of Surgical Management of Osteoarthritis of the Knee. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2023; 31:1211-1220. [PMID: 37883429 DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-23-00338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023] Open
Abstract
The Surgical Management of Osteoarthritis of the Knee Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline is based on a systematic review of published studies for surgical management of osteoarthritis of the knee in skeletally mature patients. This guideline contains 16 recommendations and seven options to assist orthopaedic surgeons and all qualified physicians with the surgical management of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee based on the best current available evidence. It is also intended to serve as an information resource for professional healthcare practitioners and developers of practice guidelines and recommendations. In addition to providing pragmatic practice recommendations, this guideline also highlights gaps in the literature and informs areas for future research and quality measure development.
Collapse
|
3
|
Ganz MP, Mannino A, Scuderi GR. The Double-Patella Sign: A Patellar Implant Loosening Case Report. JBJS Case Connect 2023; 13:01709767-202312000-00022. [PMID: 37917772 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.cc.23.00292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2023]
Abstract
CASE A 79-year-old man status post total knee arthroplasty (TKA) sustained atraumatic nondisplaced fracture of the inferior pole of the patella 1 year postoperatively. The patient had full radiographic healing and clinical resolution. Two years after injury, the patient reported new-onset knee pain and was found to have atraumatic inferior migration of the patellar component. The lateral radiograph appeared to demonstrate 2 patellae, coined "the double-patella sign." CONCLUSION Nondisplaced patellar fractures after TKA should be monitored even after full osseous healing for component loosening. Inferior migration of a loose patellar component can mimic 2 patellae on the lateral radiograph, mimicking a double patella.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maximillian P Ganz
- Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York
| | - Angelo Mannino
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Northwell Health, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Giles R Scuderi
- Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Northwell Health, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Simpson CJRW, Wright E, Ng N, Yap NJ, Ndou S, Scott CEH, Clement ND. Patellar resurfacing versus retention in cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 2023; 105-B:622-634. [PMID: 37257851 DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.105b6.bjj-2022-0970.r2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
Aims This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the influence of patellar resurfacing following cruciate-retaining (CR) and posterior-stabilized (PS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on the incidence of anterior knee pain, knee-specific patient-reported outcome measures, complication rates, and reoperation rates. Methods A systematic review of MEDLINE, PubMed, and Google Scholar was performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) according to search criteria. Search terms used included: arthroplasty, replacement, knee (Mesh), TKA, prosthesis, patella, patellar resurfacing, and patellar retaining. RCTs that compared patellar resurfacing versus unresurfaced in primary TKA were included for further analysis. Studies were evaluated using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network assessment tool for quality and minimization of bias. Data were synthesized and meta-analysis performed. Results There were 4,135 TKAs (2,068 resurfaced and 2,027 unresurfaced) identified in 35 separate cohorts from 33 peer-reviewed studies. Anterior knee pain rates were significantly higher in unresurfaced knees overall (odds ratio (OR) 1.84; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.20 to 2.83; p = 0.006) but more specifically associated with CR implants (OR 1.95; 95% CI 1.0 to 3.52; p = 0.030). There was a significantly better Knee Society function score (mean difference (MD) -1.98; 95% CI -1.1 to -2.84; p < 0.001) and Oxford Knee Score (MD -2.24; 95% CI -0.07 to -4.41; p = 0.040) for PS implants when patellar resurfacing was performed, but these differences did not exceed the minimal clinically important difference for these scores. There were no significant differences in complication rates or infection rates according to implant design. There was an overall significantly higher reoperation rate for unresurfaced TKA (OR 1.46 (95% CI 1.04 to 2.06); p = 0.030) but there was no difference between PS or CR TKA. Conclusion Patellar resurfacing, when performed with CR implants, resulted in lower rates of anterior knee pain and, when used with a PS implant, yielded better knee-specific functional outcomes. Patellar resurfacing was associated with a lower risk of reoperation overall, but implant type did not influence this.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Evan Wright
- Department of Trauma Orthopaedics, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK
| | - Nathan Ng
- Edinburgh Orthopaedics, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Ngee J Yap
- Edinburgh Orthopaedics, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Solomon Ndou
- Edinburgh Orthopaedics, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Chloe E H Scott
- Edinburgh Orthopaedics, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Nick D Clement
- Edinburgh Orthopaedics, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Annapareddy A, Mulpur P, Jayakumar T, Kikkuri RR, Suhas Masilamani AB, V R, Vaishya R, Reddy AVG. Patella non-resurfacing in primary total knee arthroplasty provides good functional results-a retrospective review of nine thousand three hundred forty six knees. INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS 2023:10.1007/s00264-023-05819-5. [PMID: 37186286 DOI: 10.1007/s00264-023-05819-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Accepted: 04/18/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patellar resurfacing has long been a contentious subject in TKA with no consensus and the literature yielding disparate results. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term functional outcomes and complications of patients undergoing primary TKA without patellar resurfacing (non-resurfacing). METHODS This study retrospectively analysed 9346 patients who underwent primary manual jig-based TKA without patellar resurfacing at a single high-volume arthroplasty centre between 2010 and 2018. Patients with a minimum three year follow-up irrespective of disease etiology and implant manufacturer were included in the study. Primary outcome was measured using Oxford knee score and patellofemoral Feller score. Secondary outcomes included determining the incidence of patellofemoral complications and re-operation rates following TKA. RESULTS A total of 8695 knees were eligible for final evaluation having a mean follow-up of 6.6 years. Mean age of the patients was 62.6 (SD-7.5) years with female predominance of (N-6619, 70.8%). The majority of the patients had primary OA (N-8792, 94.1%) with varus deformity (N-8642, 92.46%). Depuy was the most used manufacturer (n = 2592, 26.4%) with the posterior stabilised (N-4127, 44.2%) design being the most predominant. The mean Feller score of the study population was 24.5 (SD = 3) with a majority of patients having good to excellent outcomes (86.95%, N-8424) and mean Oxford knee score was 36.9 (SD-6.9) with a majority of the patients having an OKS greater than 30 (87.1%, N-8133) with anterior knee pain (AKP) reported in only 4.8% patients (N-418). Most common complications included patellar clunk (N-56, 0.7%), traumatic patellar fractures (N-62, 0.8%), quadriceps tendon tear (N-54, 0.7%) and patellar dislocation (N-4, 0.05%) CONCLUSION: Patellar non-resurfacing has no detrimental impact on functional outcomes and incidence of AKP. We conclude that it is a safe, cost-effective and satisfactory approach in primary TKA with no significant complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adarsh Annapareddy
- Sunshine Bone and Joint Institute, KIMS-Sunshine Hospitals, Hyderabad, India
| | - Praharsha Mulpur
- Sunshine Bone and Joint Institute, KIMS-Sunshine Hospitals, Hyderabad, India
| | - Tarun Jayakumar
- Sunshine Bone and Joint Institute, KIMS-Sunshine Hospitals, Hyderabad, India.
| | | | | | - Ratnakar V
- Sunshine Bone and Joint Institute, KIMS-Sunshine Hospitals, Hyderabad, India
| | | | - A V Gurava Reddy
- Sunshine Bone and Joint Institute, KIMS-Sunshine Hospitals, Hyderabad, India
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Patellar resurfacing was not associated with a clinically significant advantage when a modern patellar friendly total knee arthroplasty is employed: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Knee 2023; 41:329-341. [PMID: 36827957 DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2023.01.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2022] [Revised: 01/19/2023] [Accepted: 01/28/2023] [Indexed: 02/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Modern total knee arthroplasty (TKA) femoral components are designed to provide a more optimal articular surface for the patella whether or not it has been resurfaced. Previous systematic reviews comparing outcomes of patellar resurfacing and no resurfacing combine both historic and modern designs. AIMS The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of patellar resurfacing in modern "patellar friendly" implants on (1) incidence of anterior knee pain, (2) patient reported outcomes (3) complication rates, and (4) reoperation rates compared with unresurfaced patellae in primary TKA. METHODS MEDline, PubMed and google scholar studies were evaluated using SIGN assessment tool and data analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.2 on only randomised controlled trials. The search terms were: arthroplasty, replacement, knee (Mesh), TKA, prosthesis, patella, patellar resurfacing, patellar retaining. RESULTS Thirty-two randomised controlled studies were identified that reported the type of TKA implant used: 11 used modern "patellar friendly" implants; and 21 older "patellar non-friendly" implants. Among "patellar friendly" TKAs there were no significant differences in anterior knee pain rates between resurfaced and unresurfaced groups. Patellar resurfacing with "patellar friendly" implants had significantly higher clinical (mean difference (MD) -0.77, p = 0.007) and functional (MD -1.87, p < 0.0001) knee society scores (KSS) than unresurfaced counterparts but these did not exceed the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). Resurfacing with "patellar friendly" implants was not associated with a significant (p = 0.59) difference in the Oxford knee score (OKS), in contrast when a "patellar non-friendly" implant was used there was a significant difference (MD 3.3, p = 0.005) in favour of resurfacing. There was an increased risk of reoperation for unresurfaced TKAs with "non-patellar friendly" implants (Odds ratio (OR) 1.68, 95% CI 1.03-2.74, p = 0.04), but not for unresurfaced patellae with "patellar friendly" implants (OR 1.17, CI 0.59-2.30). CONCLUSIONS Patellar resurfacing in combination with a modern patellar friendly implant was not associated with a lower rate of anterior knee pain, complications, or reoperations compared to not resurfacing, nor did it give a clinically significant improvement in knee specific function. In contrast patellar resurfacing in combination with a "non-friendly" TKA implant was associated with a significantly better OKS and lower reoperation rate. Implant design should be acknowledged when patellar resurfacing is being considered.
Collapse
|
7
|
Adam R, Moldovan C, Tudorache S, Hârșovescu T, Orban C, Pogărășteanu M, Rusu E. Patellar Resurfacing in Total Knee Arthroplasty, a Never-Ending Controversy; Case Report and Literature Review. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:diagnostics13030383. [PMID: 36766489 PMCID: PMC9914207 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13030383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2022] [Revised: 12/15/2022] [Accepted: 01/11/2023] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains a lifesaving procedure for advanced gonarthrosis. However, patella resurfacing (PR) in TKA remains a controversial procedure, leading to extensive discussions amongst orthopedic surgeons, regarding its indications and results. Based on these premises, we present a clinical case of a 70-year-old Caucasian woman admitted for pain, swelling and limitation of left knee joint mobility. Her medical history records an Ahlback stage IV gonarthrosis with simultaneous bilateral TKA surgery performed in different hospital, when two NexGen cemented total prostheses were implanted with patellar resurfacing being performed only on the right side. Our clinical (American Knee Society Score, Lonner and Feller scales) and radiological evaluations (CT scan and Xray) revealed left patellar arthrosis and a slight lateral subluxation of the patella. The chosen treatment plan was revision surgery for PR and patellar prosthesis with a cemented patellar component, cross-linked polyethylene, no 32 NexGen model with 8.5 mm thickness. The immediate and distant postoperative evolution was favorable. Extensive literature review shows that, at present, PR remains at surgeon's discretion mainly based on his previous results. Therefore, we believe there is an imperative need to develop high quality studies based on accurate scientific evidence to universally establish valid guidelines for PR in TKA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Răzvan Adam
- Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Elias Emergency University Hospital, 011461 Bucharest, Romania
- Department of First Aid and Disaster Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Titu Maiorescu University of Bucharest, 040051 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Cosmin Moldovan
- Department of Clinical Sciences, General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Titu Maiorescu University of Bucharest, 040051 Bucharest, Romania
- Department of General Surgery, Witting Clinical Hospital, 010243 Bucharest, Romania
- Correspondence: (C.M.); (T.H.); Tel.: +40-723504207 (C.M.); +40-723234060 (T.H.)
| | - Sorin Tudorache
- Department of Preclinical Sciences, Anatomy and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, Titu Maiorescu University of Bucharest, 040051 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Tudor Hârșovescu
- Department of Preclinical Sciences, Anatomy and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, Titu Maiorescu University of Bucharest, 040051 Bucharest, Romania
- Correspondence: (C.M.); (T.H.); Tel.: +40-723504207 (C.M.); +40-723234060 (T.H.)
| | - Carmen Orban
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania
- Intensive Care Unit Department, Monza Oncology Hospital, 013812 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Mark Pogărășteanu
- Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania
- Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Dr. Carol Davila Central Military Emergency University Hospital, 010825 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Elena Rusu
- Department of Preclinical Sciences, Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Titu Maiorescu University of Bucharest, 040051 Bucharest, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hamawandi SA, Amin HI, Al-Humairi AK. Effects of the Use of Tourniquet in Total Knee Arthroplasty on the Clinical and Functional Outcomes with 5 Years of Follow-up: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Knee Surg 2023; 36:222-230. [PMID: 34261160 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1731719] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The use of tourniquet in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) had a lot of controversies with no clear agreement about the advantages and disadvantages of tourniquet. This study aims to show the effects of tourniquet use in TKA on the functional and clinical outcomes with follow-up of 5 years. This is a randomized, double-blind, and single-center study of 101 patients who were treated by TKA and divided randomly into two groups. Tourniquet was used in group A and was not used in group B. Both groups were assessed by Knee Society score (KSS), knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS), visual analogue scale (VAS) score for thigh pain, and postoperative complications. Both groups were followed up for 5 years. The group of no tourniquet showed significant better functional outcomes measured by KSS at postoperative periods of 2 weeks (p = 0.001), 6 weeks (p = 0.006), and 3 months (p = 0.034), and KOOS at postoperative periods of 2 weeks (p = 0.001), 6 weeks (p =0.001), and 3 months (p = 0.016). However, there was no significant difference in long-term follow-up of 5 years. There were significantly better results with use of tourniquet regarding surgeon's visualization during surgery, less operative time, and less calculated blood loss, while significantly better results with no use of tourniquet were reported regarding less hospital stay, less postoperative analgesic consumption, and less postoperative thigh pain measured by VAS score at postoperative periods of day 1 (p = 0.001), day 5 (p = 0.001), 2 weeks (p = 0.001), and 6 weeks (p = 0.001). Regarding postoperative blood transfusion and clinical deep venous thrombosis, there was no significant difference between use of tourniquet or not. The evidence presented in this level-1 randomized controlled trial suggests that no use of tourniquet in TKA can improve functional outcomes in early postoperative period with no significant difference on functional outcome at 5 years of follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sherwan A Hamawandi
- Department of Orthopedic, College of Medicine, Hawler Medical University, Erbil, Iraq
| | - Hazhar I Amin
- Department of Orthopaedics, Erbil Teaching Hospital, Erbil, Iraq
| | - Ameer K Al-Humairi
- Department of Community Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Babylon, Hilla, Iraq
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Tang X, He Y, Pu S, Lei L, Ning N, Shi Y, Chen J, Zhou Z. Patellar Resurfacing in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis of 50 Randomized Controlled Trials. Orthop Surg 2022; 15:379-399. [PMID: 36479594 PMCID: PMC9891932 DOI: 10.1111/os.13392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2021] [Revised: 06/10/2022] [Accepted: 06/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE During total knee arthroplasty, femur and tibia parts are regularly replaced, while resurfacing the patellar or not is an ongoing discussion. To compare revision rate, anterior knee pain rate, patient-reported outcome measures, complication, radiographic, and clinical outcomes after patellar resurfacing versus non-resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty. METHODS PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and CINAHL databases were searched on 25 April 2021 to enroll randomized controlled trials that compared patellar resurfacing versus non-resurfacing. We used the grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE) framework to assess the certainty of evidence. Our primary outcome was revision rate and secondary outcomes was anterior knee pain rate. Outcomes were pooled using the random-effect model and presented as risk ratio (RR), or mean difference (MD), with 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS Fifty studies (5586 knees) were included. Significant reductions in patellar revision rate (RR 0.41, 95% CI [0.19, 0.88]; P = 0.02; I2 = 24.20%) and non-patellar revision rate (RR 0.64, 95% CI [0.55, 0.75]; P < 0.001; I2 = 0%) were seen after patellar resurfacing. Patellar resurfacing significantly reduced the anterior knee pain rate than nonresurfacing (RR 0.72, 95% CI [0.57, 0.91]; P = 0.006; I2 = 69.5%). Significant differences in patient-reported outcome measures were found. However, these differences were inconsistent and lacked clinical importance. Patellar resurfacing resulted in a significant lower rate of patellar clunk (RR 0.58, 95% CI [0.38, 0.88]; P = 0.01; I2 = 0%), a higher patellar score (MD 1.24, 95% CI [0.67, 0.81]; P < 0.001; I2 = 73.8%), but prolonged surgical time (MD 8.59, 95% CI [5.27, 11.91]; P < 0.001; I2 = 88.8%). CONCLUSIONS The clear relationship is that patellar resurfacing reduces revisions, anterior knee pain, and patellar clunk. It will be interesting to compare the initial cost with the revision cost when required and cost-utility analysis with long-term results in future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiumei Tang
- West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University/Department of OrthopedicsWest China Hospital, Sichuan UniversityChengduChina
| | - Yue He
- West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University/Department of OrthopedicsWest China Hospital, Sichuan UniversityChengduChina
| | - Shi Pu
- Department of Nephrology, The Key Laboratory for the Prevention and Treatment of Chronic Kidney Disease of Chongqing, Chongqing Clinical Research Center of Kidney and Urology Diseases, Xinqiao HospitalArmy Medical University (Third Military Medical University)ChongqingChina
| | - Lei Lei
- West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University/Department of OrthopedicsWest China Hospital, Sichuan UniversityChengduChina
| | - Ning Ning
- West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University/Department of OrthopedicsWest China Hospital, Sichuan UniversityChengduChina
| | - Yu Shi
- Department of Nephrology, The Key Laboratory for the Prevention and Treatment of Chronic Kidney Disease of Chongqing, Chongqing Clinical Research Center of Kidney and Urology Diseases, Xinqiao HospitalArmy Medical University (Third Military Medical University)ChongqingChina
| | - Jiali Chen
- West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University/Department of OrthopedicsWest China Hospital, Sichuan UniversityChengduChina
| | - Zongke Zhou
- Department of Orthopedics, West China Hospital/West China School of MedicineSichuan UniversityChengduChina
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Grela M, Barrett M, Kunutsor SK, Blom AW, Whitehouse MR, Matharu GS. Clinical effectiveness of patellar resurfacing, no resurfacing and selective resurfacing in primary total knee replacement: systematic review and meta-analysis of interventional and observational evidence. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2022; 23:932. [PMID: 36273138 PMCID: PMC9587662 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05877-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2022] [Accepted: 09/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Patellar resurfacing is optional during total knee replacement (TKR). Some surgeons always resurface the patella, some never resurface, and others selectively resurface. Which resurfacing strategy provides optimal outcomes is unclear. We assessed the effectiveness of patellar resurfacing, no resurfacing, and selective resurfacing in primary TKR. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, and bibliographies were searched to November 2021 for randomised-control trials (RCTs) comparing outcomes for two or more resurfacing strategies (resurfacing, no resurfacing, or selective resurfacing) in primary TKR. Observational studies were included if limited or no RCTs existed for resurfacing comparisons. Outcomes assessed were patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), complications, and further surgery. Study-specific relative risks [RR] were aggregated using random-effects models. Quality of the evidence was assessed using GRADE. Results We identified 33 RCTs involving 5,540 TKRs (2,727 = resurfacing, 2,772 = no resurfacing, 41 = selective resurfacing). One trial reported on selective resurfacing. Patellar resurfacing reduced anterior knee pain compared with no resurfacing (RR = 0.65 (95% CI = 0.44–0.96)); there were no significant differences in PROMs. Resurfacing reduced the risk of revision surgery (RR = 0.63, CI = 0.42–0.94) and other complications (RR = 0.54, CI = 0.39–0.74) compared with no resurfacing. Quality of evidence ranged from high to very low. Limited observational evidence (5 studies, TKRs = 215,419) suggested selective resurfacing increased the revision risk (RR = 1.14, CI = 1.05–1.22) compared with resurfacing. Compared with no resurfacing, selective resurfacing had a higher risk of pain (RR = 1.25, CI = 1.04–1.50) and lower risk of revision (RR = 0.92, CI = 0.85–0.99). Conclusions Level 1 evidence supports TKR with patellar resurfacing over no resurfacing. Resurfacing has a reduced risk of anterior knee pain, revision surgery, and complications, despite PROMs being comparable. High-quality RCTs involving selective resurfacing, the most common strategy in the UK and other countries, are needed given the limited observational data suggests selective resurfacing may not be effective over other strategies. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-022-05877-7.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michal Grela
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Level 1 Learning and Research Building, Southmead Hospital, Westbury-On-Trym, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK
| | - Matthew Barrett
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Level 1 Learning and Research Building, Southmead Hospital, Westbury-On-Trym, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK
| | - Setor K Kunutsor
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Level 1 Learning and Research Building, Southmead Hospital, Westbury-On-Trym, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK.,National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, Bristol, UK
| | - Ashley W Blom
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Level 1 Learning and Research Building, Southmead Hospital, Westbury-On-Trym, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK.,National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, Bristol, UK
| | - Michael R Whitehouse
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Level 1 Learning and Research Building, Southmead Hospital, Westbury-On-Trym, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK.,National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, Bristol, UK
| | - Gulraj S Matharu
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Level 1 Learning and Research Building, Southmead Hospital, Westbury-On-Trym, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Deroche E, Batailler C, Swan J, Sappey-Marinier E, Neyret P, Servien E, Lustig S. No difference between resurfaced and non-resurfaced patellae with a modern prosthesis design: a prospective randomized study of 250 total knee arthroplasties. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2022; 30:1025-1038. [PMID: 33661323 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-021-06521-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2021] [Accepted: 02/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Despite numerous well-conducted studies and meta-analyses, the management of the patella during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial. The aim of our study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes between patients with and without patellar resurfacing and to determine the influence of resurfacing on patellar tracking with a "patella-friendly" prosthesis. METHODS A single-centered prospective randomized controlled study was performed between April 2017 and November 2018. Two hundred and forty-five consecutive patients (250 knees) scheduled for TKA were randomized for patellar resurfacing or patella non-resurfacing. All patients received the same total knee prosthesis and were evaluated clinically and radiologically, including the International Knee Society Score (KSS knee and function), Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), anterior knee pain (AKP), pain when climbing stairs, patellar tilt, and patellar translation. RESULTS Two hundred and twenty-nine knees were available for clinical evaluation and 221 knees for radiographic analysis. The revision rate for patellofemoral cause was 3.1% (7 cases) with no difference between the groups (p = 0.217). There was no difference in survival rate between patellar resurfacing (88.3%) and non-resurfacing (85.3%) after 24 months (p = 0.599). There were no differences in KSS functional component (p = 0.599), KSS knee component (p = 0.396), FJS (p = 0.798), and AKP (p = 0.688) at a mean follow-up of 18 months. There was twice as much stair pain for the non-resurfacing group (17.1% versus 8.5%) (p = 0.043). There was patellar tilt in 43% of resurfaced knees (n = 50/116) versus 29% in non-resurfaced knees (n = 30/105) (p = 0.025); however, there was more patellar translation in the non-resurfaced group (21.0% versus 7.8%) (p < 0.001). There were no specific complications attributed to the patellar resurfacing procedure. There were four secondary patellar resurfacing procedures (3.6%) in the non-resurfaced group after a mean of 10 ± 7 months (1-17) postoperatively. CONCLUSION There is no superiority of patellar resurfacing or non-resurfacing in terms of clinical or radiological outcomes at mid-term. Secondary patellar resurfacing is rare. There is not enough evidence to recommend systematic patellar resurfacing with a "patella-friendly" prosthesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Etienne Deroche
- Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine Department, FIFA Medical Center of Excellence, Croix-Rousse Hospital, Lyon University Hospital, Lyon, France.
| | - Cécile Batailler
- Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine Department, FIFA Medical Center of Excellence, Croix-Rousse Hospital, Lyon University Hospital, Lyon, France
| | - John Swan
- Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine Department, FIFA Medical Center of Excellence, Croix-Rousse Hospital, Lyon University Hospital, Lyon, France
| | - Elliot Sappey-Marinier
- Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine Department, FIFA Medical Center of Excellence, Croix-Rousse Hospital, Lyon University Hospital, Lyon, France
| | | | - Elvire Servien
- Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine Department, FIFA Medical Center of Excellence, Croix-Rousse Hospital, Lyon University Hospital, Lyon, France.,LIBM-EA 7424, Interuniversity Laboratory of Biology of Mobility, Claude Bernard Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France
| | - Sébastien Lustig
- Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine Department, FIFA Medical Center of Excellence, Croix-Rousse Hospital, Lyon University Hospital, Lyon, France.,Univ Lyon, Claude Bernard Lyon 1 University, IFSTTAR, LBMC UMR_T9406, 69622, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
ROBBEN BJ, DE VRIES AJ, SPEKENBRINK-SPOOREN A, NELISSEN RGHH, BROUWER RW. Rare primary patellar resurfacing does not lead to more secondary patellar resurfacing: analysis of 70,014 primary total knee arthroplasties in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI). Acta Orthop 2022; 93:334-340. [PMID: 35156687 PMCID: PMC8842636 DOI: 10.2340/17453674.2022.2078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2021] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Current literature provides no conclusive evidence in support of a patellar resurfacing vs. non-resurfacing regime. Therefore, we compared the incidence of secondary patellar resurfacing among hospitals using 3 different primary patellar resurfacing regimes in the Netherlands. Secondarily we identified patient and surgical characteristics associated with primary patellar resurfacing and secondary patella resurfacing following non-resurfaced primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). PATIENTS AND METHODS We used data from 2014-2016 of the Dutch Arthroplasty Register. Hospitals were divided into rare (0-10%), selective (>10% to 90%), and usually primary patellar resurfacing (>90%) regimes. We performed a logistic regression analysis for associated factors of primary patellar resurfacing in the selective resurfacing subgroup and for secondary patellar resurfacing in the rare resurfacing subgroup. RESULTS The rate of primary resurfacing was 5.2% for the rare and 36% for the selective patellar resurfacing regimes, with similar secondary patellar resurfacing (1.1% vs. 0.9%). Predictors for primary patellar resurfacing were being female (OR 1.3) and younger (50-59 years, OR 1.4). The PS prosthesis design had a higher OR (4.1) than the CR design. Younger age (50-59 years, OR 1.5) and PS prosthesis (OR 2.7) were significant predictors of secondary patellar resurfacing. Particular surgical systems have a higher rate of primary and secondary patellar resurfacing. INTERPRETATION Low rates of secondary patellar resurfacing in hospitals with a rare resurfacing regime indicate that this regime does not lead to more secondary patellar resurfacing then selective resurfacing. In the Dutch orthopedic community primary and secondary patellar resurfacing is associated with using a posterior stabilizing design, being younger, and using particular TKA systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bart J ROBBEN
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Martini Hospital Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Astrid J DE VRIES
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Martini Hospital Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Rob G H H NELISSEN
- Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI), ’s-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands,Department of Orthopedics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Reinoud W BROUWER
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Martini Hospital Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
To Resurface or Not to Resurface the Patella in Total Knee Arthroplasty, That Is the Question: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Medicina (B Aires) 2022; 58:medicina58020227. [PMID: 35208551 PMCID: PMC8875724 DOI: 10.3390/medicina58020227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2021] [Revised: 01/26/2022] [Accepted: 01/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Objetives: Currently, total knee arthroplasty is one of the most common surgeries, increasing with the increase in life expectancy. Whether or not to replace the patella has been a subject of debate over the years, remaining in controversy and without reaching a consensus. Over the years, different meta-analyses have been carried out in order to provide evidence on the subject, although, in recent times, there have not been many new studies in this regard. Therefore, it is considered necessary that the latest works form part of a new meta-analysis. Materials and Method: We searched the literature using PUBMED, SCOPUS, the Cochrane database and VHL from 2010 to 2020. The search terms used were “patellar” AND “resurfacing” OR “Replacement” and “no resurfacing” OR “no replacement”. A meta-analysis was performed with Stata software (Stata version 15.1). Forest plots were generated to illustrate the overall effect of knee arthroplasty interventions. Results: As a result, it was obtained that there is a significantly higher risk of suffering AKP in the non-resurfacing group, in addition to a significant increase in the risk of undergoing a reoperation in the non-resurfacing group. On the other hand, significant differences were obtained in favor of the resurfacing group in both the clinical and Feller KSS, with functional KSS being inconclusive. After analyzing different variables throughout the literature, it does seem clear that the non-resurfacing group may present a higher risk of reoperation than the resurfacing group. Conclusion: For all these reasons, we think that, although it does seem that not replacing the patella can precipitate a reoperation, it is not clear whether this reoperation is a direct consequence of not having replaced the patella. Therefore, in our opinion, the treatment must be individualized for each patient.
Collapse
|
14
|
Huitema GC, de Vries LMA, Verboom TW, Spekenbrink-Spooren A, Steens J. Patella related problems as common reason for revision of NexGen PS® total knee arthroplasty without patella resurfacing: An analysis of 5911 primary total knee arthroplasties registered in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register. Knee 2022; 34:217-222. [PMID: 35030503 DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2021.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2021] [Revised: 10/29/2021] [Accepted: 12/18/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patella resurfacing remains controversial in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA).The aim of this study was to investigate if there was a difference in revision rate and reason for revision within 8 years after single brand primary cemented TKA with or without patella resurfacing, using data from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register. METHODS All primary TKA surgeries with a posterior stabilized cemented primary NexGen®, between 2010 and 2013 with diagnosis osteoarthritis were analyzed (n = 5911). Multivariate cox regression analyses were performed to analyze differences in revision rate between TKA with or without patella component, and was adjusted for age and previous surgery. RESULTS Of 5911 TKA surgeries, 4795 were performed without patella resurfacing (81.1%) and 1116 with patella resurfacing (18.9%). There was a significant difference in patellar problems as reason for revision between patients after primary TKA with patella resurfacing (9.3%) and without patella resurfacing (29.9%) (p = 0.01). This was mostly caused by patellar pain (28.0%). There was no significant difference in cumulative revision rate within between TKA with patella resurfacing and without patella resurfacing. CONCLUSION In conclusion, 30% of patients who need revision surgery after TKA using NexGen® PS without patella resurfacing the reason for revision is patella related problems, compared to 9% after TKA NexGen® PS with patella resurfacing. There was no difference in cumulative incidence of revision after primary surgery of all TKA's using NexGen® PS with or without patella. To reduce the probability of reoperation for patella related problems, our data suggest the patella should be resurface during primary TKA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gerian C Huitema
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Dijklander Hospital, Maelsonstraat 3, 1624NP, Hoorn and Purmerend, the Netherlands.
| | - Lieke M A de Vries
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Dijklander Hospital, Maelsonstraat 3, 1624NP, Hoorn and Purmerend, the Netherlands.
| | - Tom W Verboom
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Dijklander Hospital, Maelsonstraat 3, 1624NP, Hoorn and Purmerend, the Netherlands.
| | - Anneke Spekenbrink-Spooren
- Dutch Arthroplasty Register (Landelijke Registratie Orthopedische Implantaten), Bruistensingel 230, 5232 AD, 's Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands.
| | - Jeroen Steens
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Dijklander Hospital, Maelsonstraat 3, 1624NP, Hoorn and Purmerend, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Fleaca S, Mohor C, Dura H, Chicea R, Mohor C, Boicean A, Roman M. Effect of patella resurfacing on functional outcome and revision rate in primary total knee arthroplasty (Review). Exp Ther Med 2021; 23:104. [DOI: 10.3892/etm.2021.11027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2021] [Accepted: 10/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Sorin Fleaca
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, ‘Lucian Blaga’ University of Sibiu, 550169 Sibiu, Romania
| | - Cosmin Mohor
- Department of Basic Science, Faculty of Medicine, ‘Lucian Blaga’ University of Sibiu, 550169 Sibiu, Romania
| | - Horatiu Dura
- Department of Basic Science, Faculty of Medicine, ‘Lucian Blaga’ University of Sibiu, 550169 Sibiu, Romania
| | - Radu Chicea
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, ‘Lucian Blaga’ University of Sibiu, 550169 Sibiu, Romania
| | - Calin Mohor
- Department of Basic Science, Faculty of Medicine, ‘Lucian Blaga’ University of Sibiu, 550169 Sibiu, Romania
| | - Adrian Boicean
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, ‘Lucian Blaga’ University of Sibiu, 550169 Sibiu, Romania
| | - Mihai Roman
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, ‘Lucian Blaga’ University of Sibiu, 550169 Sibiu, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Raaij TMV, Meij EVD, Vries AJD, Raay JJAMV. Patellar Resurfacing Does Not Improve Clinical Outcome in Patients with Symptomatic Tricompartmental Knee Osteoarthritis. An RCT Study of 40 Patients Receiving Primary Cruciate Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 2021; 34:1503-1509. [PMID: 32434236 DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1710369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
There is some evidence that patellofemoral (PF) joint osteoarthritis (OA) causes anterior knee pain (AKP) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We hypothesized that patellar resurfacing in primary TKA for patients with symptomatic tricompartmental knee OA yields better clinical results after 2 years than non-resurfacing. A single center randomized controlled clinical trial comparing 40 patients receiving 42 cruciate retaining TKAs with (n = 21) or without patellar resurfacing (n = 21) was conducted. Primary outcome was the specific PF joint score HSS Baldini and secondary outcomes were the Knee Society Score (KSS) and the Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Scale (KOOS). After 2 years no significant differences between both groups and between the groups in time for HSS Baldini, KSS, and KOOS were found. HSS Baldini score improved significantly after 6 weeks in both groups (p < 0.001) and did not improve in time afterward. At final follow-up the HSS Baldini mean score improved from a preoperative mean of 39 to 88 (difference of 49 points; p < 0.001)) for without patellar resurfacing group, and from a preoperative mean of 37 to 81 for patellar resurfacing group (difference of 47 points; p < 0.001). One patient in the patellar resurfacing group underwent a soft tissue re-alignment procedure because of patellar subluxation. Two patients in without patellar resurfacing group received secondary patellar button placement. Patellar resurfacing in primary TKA for patients with symptomatic tricompartmental OA has no beneficial effect over non-resurfacing and seems unnecessary. A special PF joint outcome measurement tool (HSS Baldini) and common knee scores showed no better knee function or AKP outcomes for with patellar resurfacing over without patellar resurfacing group in time and after 2 years of follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tom M van Raaij
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Martini Hospital Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Evelien van der Meij
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Martini Hospital Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Astrid J de Vries
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Martini Hospital Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Jos J A M van Raay
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Martini Hospital Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Li D, Bi AS, Samra SS, Samra NS, Wu D, Ma Y. Functional Outcomes Following Total Knee Arthroplasty Without Patellar Resurfacing: A Minimum Two-Year Follow-Up Retrospective Cohort Study. Cureus 2021; 13:e16036. [PMID: 34345536 PMCID: PMC8321597 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.16036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2020] [Accepted: 06/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
This paper seeks to address the effectiveness of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) when performed without patellar resurfacing. The objective of this article is to investigate the effect of total knee arthroplasty without patellofemoral resurfacing on postoperative outcome. All patients with degenerative knee osteoarthritis (OA) that underwent TKA without patellar resurfacing were included in the study. The clinical data of 163 patients, including 98 females and 65 males with a mean age of 63 years (range 54-78 years) were retrospectively analyzed from April 2008 to April 2011. Intraoperative cartilage degeneration according to Outerbridge classification criteria was as follows: 22 cases of grade I, 38 cases of grade II, 64 cases of grade III, 39 cases of grade IV. There were no significant differences in gender, age, and side differences between the patients at all levels (P > 0.05). The duration of tourniquet use and related complications were recorded. Knee function was assessed using the American Knee Society Scoring System (KSS) and the patellar score (PS). Patient satisfaction and knee pain were assessed by the pain visual analog scale (VAS). The evaluation was conducted using routine X-ray film to observe the position of the prosthesis and the patella. Statistical analysis used included a comparison between groups by analysis of variance (ANOVA) using the Student-Newman-Keuls (SNK) test and comparison of grade data using the rank-sum test. The average tourniquet time was 125 minutes, with a range of 90-150 minutes. All the incisions healed with primary intention without early complications. All patients were followed for two to five years with an average of 3.6 years. At six months and at the last follow-up, the KSS and PS scores were significantly higher than those before surgery (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the sixth month and the last follow-up (P > 0.05). There were significant differences in preoperative KSS and PS scores between patients with different grades of cartilage degeneration (P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference at the last follow-up (P > 0.05). At the last follow-up, seven patients had persistent anterior knee pain, five patients had mild pain, and two patients had moderate pain according to the VAS assessment criteria. Patient satisfaction evaluation was as follows: 90 patients were very satisfied, 66 patients were satisfied, five patients were uncertain, and two patients were unsatisfied. There were no significant differences in satisfaction and knee pain between patients with different grades of patellofemoral degeneration (P > 0.05). In conclusion, at six months and at the last follow-up, outcome measures for patients were significantly higher than before surgery for TKA without the use of patellar resurfacing and the majority of patients were satisfied with the outcome of the procedure. TKA continues to be a successful procedure without the use of patellar resurfacing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Li
- Orthopedics, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, USA
| | - Andrew S Bi
- Orthopaedic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, USA
| | - Sahej S Samra
- Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, USA
| | - Nehal S Samra
- Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, USA
| | - Decheng Wu
- Medicine, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 301 PLA Military Hospital, Beijing, CHN
| | - Yuangzheng Ma
- Orthopaedic Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, CHN
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Parsons T, Al-Jabri T, Clement ND, Maffulli N, Kader DF. Patella resurfacing during total knee arthroplasty is cost-effective and has lower re-operation rates compared to non-resurfacing. J Orthop Surg Res 2021; 16:185. [PMID: 33706779 PMCID: PMC7948323 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-021-02295-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2021] [Accepted: 02/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The decision to resurface the patella as part of total knee arthroplasty may be influenced by the surgeon's preference, education, training, tradition and geographic location. Advocates for non-resurfacing or selectively resurfacing may claim no difference in patient reported outcomes, and that resurfacing is associated with increased risks such as extensor mechanism injury or malalignment, problems with the design of the patella component and technical issues intraoperatively. AIMS To critically examine factors that should be considered in addition to patient reported outcomes in the decision process of resurfacing or non-resurfacing of the patella in total knee arthroplasty. METHOD A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify factors that may influence decision making in addition to knee specific patient reported outcome measures such as surgical risks, patient quality of life, procedure cost, re-operation rate, implant design, surgeons learning curve and the fate of remaining cartilage in native patellae. RESULTS Patient-reported outcomes are equivocal for resurfacing and non-resurfacing. Critical analysis of the available literature suggests that the complications of resurfacing the patella are historic, which is now lower with improved implant design and surgical technique. Routine resurfacing was cost-effective in the long term (potential saving £104 per case) and has lower rates of revision (absolute risk reduction 4%). Finally, surgical judgment in selective resurfacing was prone to errors. CONCLUSION Patella resurfacing and non-resurfacing had similar patient-reported outcomes. However, patella resurfacing was cost-effective and was associated with a lower rate of re-operation compared to non-resurfacing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Parsons
- South West London Elective Orthopaedic Centre, Denbies Wing, Epsom General Hospital, Surrey, KT18 7EG UK
- Royal United Hospital Bath, Combe Park, Bath, Avon BA1 3NG UK
| | - Talal Al-Jabri
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ England
| | - Nick D. Clement
- South West London Elective Orthopaedic Centre, Denbies Wing, Epsom General Hospital, Surrey, KT18 7EG UK
- Department of Orthopaedics, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Little France, Edinburgh, EH16 4SA UK
| | - Nicola Maffulli
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, Via S. Allende, 84081 Baronissi, SA Italy
- Queen Mary University of London, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Centre for Sports and Exercise Medicine, Mile End Hospital, 275 Bancroft Road, London, E1 4DG England
- School of Pharmacy and Bioengineering, Keele University School of Medicine, Stoke on Trent, ST5 5BG UK
| | - Deiary F. Kader
- South West London Elective Orthopaedic Centre, Denbies Wing, Epsom General Hospital, Surrey, KT18 7EG UK
- University of Kurdistan Hewler, Erbil, Iraq
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Chen K, Dai X, Li L, Chen Z, Cui H, Lv S. Patellar resurfacing versus nonresurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Orthop Surg Res 2021; 16:83. [PMID: 33494774 PMCID: PMC7830853 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-020-02185-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2020] [Accepted: 12/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Whether resurface the patella or not in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) was controversial. In 2013, we conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RTCs). After that, plenty of studies have been carried out, but there still existed a great deal of controversy. In order to update our previous study, we conducted this update meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of patellar resurfacing in TKA. METHODS Databases were searched for RCTs comparing the outcomes of patellar resurfacing and nonresurfacing in TKA. Outcomes of knee relevant indicators were analysed. To see the short- and long-term effects, we calculated the data in total and divided the patients who were followed up for ≤ 3 years and ≥ 5 years into two subgroups as well. RESULTS Thirty-two trials assessing 6887 knees were eligible. There was a significant difference in terms of reoperation (in total and ≥ 5 years), Knee Society Score (KSS), function score (in total and ≥ 5 years) and noise. While no significant difference was found in the following items: reoperation (≤ 3 years), anterior knee pain (AKP), function score (≤ 3 years), range of motion (ROM), Oxford score, the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), visual analogue score (VAS), Feller score, patellar tilt and the patients' satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS We found that patellar resurfacing could reduce the occurrence of reoperation and noise after surgery, as well as increase the KSS and function score, while it might not influence the outcomes such as AKP, ROM, Oxford score, KOOS, VAS, Feller score, patellar tilt and the patients' satisfaction. The results are different from our previous finding in the meta-analysis. In conclusion, we prefer patellar resurfacing in TKA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kai Chen
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hai'an People's Hospital, Zhongba Road 17, Hai'an, Nantong, 226600, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiaoyu Dai
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The First People's Hospital of Changzhou Affiliated to Soochow University, Juqian Road 185, Changzhou, 213000, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China
| | - Lidong Li
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hai'an People's Hospital, Zhongba Road 17, Hai'an, Nantong, 226600, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhigang Chen
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hai'an People's Hospital, Zhongba Road 17, Hai'an, Nantong, 226600, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China
| | - Haidong Cui
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hai'an People's Hospital, Zhongba Road 17, Hai'an, Nantong, 226600, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China
| | - Shujun Lv
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hai'an People's Hospital, Zhongba Road 17, Hai'an, Nantong, 226600, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Controversial Topics in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A 5-Year Update (Part 1). JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS GLOBAL RESEARCH AND REVIEWS 2020; 4:e1900047. [PMID: 32672726 PMCID: PMC7028773 DOI: 10.5435/jaaosglobal-d-19-00047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
This review article examines updates to the literature during the past 5 years on numerous topics related to total knee arthroplasty which were felt to have ongoing controversy. These include the use of peripheral nerve blocks and local infiltrative analgesia, intrathecal morphine, patellar resurfacing, and bearing designs.
Collapse
|
21
|
Huang YF, Gao YH, Ding L, Liu B, Liu JG, Qi X. Influence of femoral implant design modification on anterior knee pain and patellar crepitus in patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty without patella resurfacing. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2020; 21:364. [PMID: 32517681 PMCID: PMC7285730 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-020-03391-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2019] [Accepted: 06/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The incidence of patient dissatisfaction due to anterior knee pain (AKP) and patellar crepitus after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains a concern. However, it has been shown that improvements in the femoral component of traditional prostheses could reduce these instances of pain in the case of TKA performed with patellar resurfacing. This study aims to investigate whether TKA without patellar resurfacing can also benefit from the aforementioned femoral component modification in reducing AKP and patellar crepitus post-TKA. Methods Sixty-two patients (85 knees) who underwent TKA using the modern prosthesis and 62 age- and sex-matched patients (90 knees) fitted with the traditional prosthesis were enrolled in this study. The occurrence of AKP and patellar crepitus as well as the Knee Society Score (KSS) were consequently recorded, and the data was analyzed in order to determine whether there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups. Results The incidence of AKP was significantly lower in the study group compared with the control group at the 3-month and 1-year follow-ups (4.7% vs. 13.3% [p = 0.048] and 3.5% vs. 13.3% [p = 0.021], respectively). In addition, the incidence of patellar crepitus was also significantly lower in the study group compared with the control group at the 3-month and 1-year follow-ups (15.3% vs. 34.4% [p = 0.004] and 10.6% vs. 28.9% [p = 0.002], respectively). There was no significant difference in the KSS between the two groups. Conclusions These results revealed that TKA without patellar resurfacing will indeed benefit from the modified femoral implant design in reducing AKP and patellar crepitus, a finding that may be beneficial to surgeons who select implants for their patients when patellar resurfacing is not planned or not possible due to other reasons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi-Fan Huang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, 130021, China
| | - Yu-Hang Gao
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, 130021, China
| | - Lu Ding
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, 130021, China
| | - Bo Liu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, 130021, China
| | - Jian-Guo Liu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, 130021, China
| | - Xin Qi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, 130021, China.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Jones CW, Jacobs H, Shumborski S, Talbot S, Redgment A, Brighton R, Walter WL. Sagittal Stability and Implant Design Affect Patient Reported Outcomes After Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2020; 35:747-751. [PMID: 31735490 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.10.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2019] [Revised: 10/08/2019] [Accepted: 10/10/2019] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Joint stability is one of the goals of any joint replacement. The contribution of prosthesis design to sagittal stability in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has emerged as an area of interest. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the sagittal stability of four prosthesis types and determine the effect on patient reported outcome measures (PROMs). METHODS A matched-cohort cross-sectional study was performed on 60 patients after TKA at 1-year follow-up. Three surgeons performed 10 medially stabilized (MS) TKA and 10 non-MS TKA. Sagittal stability was assessed by a blinded observer using a KT-1000 arthrometer, Lachman's test, and the anterior drawer test. PROMs (Oxford, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, Forgotten joint score) and visual analog scale assessed function and satisfaction. RESULTS MS TKA had significantly decreased translation on KT-1000 and improved stability compared with non-MS TKA (P < .05). Increased PROMs were demonstrated in the MS TKA group compared with the non-MS TKA group (P < .05). When divided based on objective stability, regardless of the prosthesis type, patients with a stable knee had superior PROMs (P < .05), particularly in sport-related questions. CONCLUSION The MS TKA had significantly greater sagittal stability, improved PROMs, and satisfaction compared with non-MS TKA. Independent of prosthesis design, patients with greater sagittal stability demonstrated improved PROMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher W Jones
- Fiona Stanley Hospital Group & Orthopaedics WA, Perth, Australia; Curtin University, Perth, Australia; University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Hans Jacobs
- Steve Biko Academic Hospital, The University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
| | | | - Simon Talbot
- Orthopaedic Department, Western Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | | | - William L Walter
- The University of Sydney & Northern Local Area Health District (Royal North Shore Hospital), Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Klem NR, Kent P, Smith A, Dowsey M, Fary R, Schütze R, O'Sullivan P, Choong P, Bunzli S. Satisfaction after total knee replacement for osteoarthritis is usually high, but what are we measuring? A systematic review. OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE OPEN 2020; 2:100032. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ocarto.2020.100032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2019] [Accepted: 01/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
|
24
|
Coory JA, Tan KG, Whitehouse SL, Hatton A, Graves SE, Crawford RW. The Outcome of Total Knee Arthroplasty With and Without Patellar Resurfacing up to 17 Years: A Report From the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. J Arthroplasty 2020; 35:132-138. [PMID: 31477541 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2019] [Revised: 07/12/2019] [Accepted: 08/02/2019] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains a controversial issue after more than 4 decades of TKA. Despite a growing body of evidence from registry data, resurfacing is still based largely on a surgeon's preference and training. The purpose of this study is to provide long-term outcomes for patellar resurfaced compared to when the patella is not resurfaced. METHODS Data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (1999-2017) were used for this study. The analysis included 570,735 primary TKAs undertaken for osteoarthritis. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 17-year cumulative percent revision rates were used to compare revision rates between 4 subgroups: minimally stabilized (MS) patellar resurfacing, posterior stabilized (PS) patellar resurfacing, MS unresurfaced, and PS unresurfaced patella. Additional analyses of the patellar implant type and a comparison of inlay and onlay patellar resurfacing were also performed. RESULTS For all primary TKA, procedures where the patella was not resurfaced have a higher rate of revision compared to procedures where the patella was resurfaced (HR, 1.31; confidence interval, 1.28-1.35; P < .001). Unresurfaced PS knees have the highest cumulative percent revision at 17 years (11.1%), followed by MS unresurfaced (8.8%), PS resurfaced (7.9%), and MS resurfaced (7.1%). Inlay patellar resurfacing has a higher rate of revision compared to onlay patellar resurfacing (HR, 1.27; confidence interval, 1.17-1.37; P < .001). CONCLUSION Resurfacing the patella reduces the rate of revision for both MS and PS knees. MS knees with patellar resurfacing have the lowest rate of revision. Onlay patella designs are associated with a lower revision rate compared to inlay patella designs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph A Coory
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Prince Charles Hospital, Chermside, Queensland, Australia
| | - Kelvin G Tan
- Orthopaedic Research Unit, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, Australia
| | - Sarah L Whitehouse
- Orthopaedic Research Unit, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, Australia
| | - Alesha Hatton
- South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, Australia
| | - Stephen E Graves
- Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR), Adelaide, Australia
| | - Ross W Crawford
- Orthopaedic Research Unit, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Effect of Patellar Resurfacing on Clinical Outcomes, Range of Knee Motion and Anterior Knee Pain in Patients with Total Knee Arthroplasty. SERBIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL RESEARCH 2019. [DOI: 10.2478/sjecr-2018-0067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives: In this study, we retrospectively compare the clinical results, range of knee motion and anterior knee pain in patients on whom we performed knee arthroplasty with and without patellar resurfacing.
Thirty-eight patients were evaluated in the study. Knee Society scores, knee range of motion and anterior knee pain before and 12 months after surgery were detected. Patients were divided into two groups: resurfaced patellas and nonresurfaced patellas. There were 18 patients in the resurfaced group and 20 patients in the nonresurfaced group.
Mean Knee Society score was 40.72±13.09 in the resur-faced group and 38.55±5.88 in the nonresurfaced group before surgery. Mean Knee Society score was 80.38±7.78 in the resur-faced group and 80.10±3.22 in the nonresurfaced group in the last control. Mean knee range of motion was 92.83±12.12 degrees in the resurfaced group and 91.05±10.10 degrees in the nonresurfaced group before surgery. Mean range of motion was 106.22±9.13 degrees in the resurfaced group and 97.25±8.50 degrees in the nonresurfaced group after surgery. There were twelve patients with anterior pain before surgery in the resur-faced group and 13 patients with anterior knee pain before surgery in the nonresurfaced group. After surgery, there was one patient with anterior pain in the resurfaced group and 9 patients with anterior knee pain in the nonresurfaced group.
Anterior knee pain ratio was smaller in the resurfaced group than in the nonresurfaced group, and there was a significant difference in range of knee motion as a result of our study. We offered to resurface the patella.
Collapse
|
26
|
Teel AJ, Esposito JG, Lanting BA, Howard JL, Schemitsch EH. Patellar Resurfacing in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Arthroplasty 2019; 34:3124-3132. [PMID: 31427130 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.07.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2019] [Revised: 06/25/2019] [Accepted: 07/16/2019] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The management of the patella during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial. The aim of this study is to evaluate the evidence regarding the use of patellar resurfacing in TKA. METHODS A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed to compare outcomes between knees receiving patellar resurfacing vs those not receiving resurfacing during primary TKA. Outcomes of interest were the Knee Society Scores, reoperation rates, anterior knee pain, patient satisfaction, Oxford Knee Score, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score subscores, and range of motion. RESULTS Twenty RCTs met all eligibility criteria and were included in the analysis. There were statistically significant differences favoring the resurfaced group in the knee component and functional component of Knee Society Scores that were not clinically significant. There was an increased risk of reoperation among knees that did not receive resurfacing with number needed to treat to prevent one case of reoperation of 25 knees (for reoperation for any reason) and 33 knees (for reoperation for anterior knee pain). There were no statistically significant differences in any other outcomes. CONCLUSION The only clear relationship is that knees that do not receive patellar resurfacing are more likely to receive reoperation, most often for secondary resurfacing. However, the disease burden of differing complication profiles associated with resurfacing and nonresurfacing groups remains unclear. Continuing to collect data from large, well-designed RCTs would be beneficial in guiding management of the patella during TKA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron J Teel
- Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, London, ON, Canada
| | - John G Esposito
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, London, ON, Canada; London Health Sciences Centre, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, London, ON, Canada
| | - Brent A Lanting
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, London, ON, Canada; London Health Sciences Centre, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, London, ON, Canada
| | - James L Howard
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, London, ON, Canada; London Health Sciences Centre, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, London, ON, Canada
| | - Emil H Schemitsch
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, London, ON, Canada; London Health Sciences Centre, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, London, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Routine Patellar Resurfacing During Total Knee Arthroplasty Is Not Cost-Effective in Patients Without Patellar Arthritis. J Arthroplasty 2019; 34:1963-1968. [PMID: 31104838 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.04.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2019] [Revised: 04/06/2019] [Accepted: 04/22/2019] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Currently, the decision to resurface the patella is often made irrespective of the presence of patellar arthritis. The purpose of this study is to utilize the existing literature to assess cost-utility of routinely vs selectively resurfacing the patella. METHODS Prospective randomized studies of patella resurfacing vs non-resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were identified through literature review. Data from these studies represented probabilities of varied outcomes following TKA dependent upon patella resurfacing. Using previously validated utility scores from the McKnee modified Health Utilities Index, endpoint utility values were provided for each potential outcome. RESULTS Literature review yielded a total of 14 studies with 3,562 patients receiving 3,823 TKAs, of which 1,873 (49.0%) patellae were resurfaced. Persistent postoperative anterior knee pain occurred in 20.9% vs 13.2% (P < .001) and patella reoperation was performed in 3.7% vs 1.6% (P < .001) of unresurfaced and resurfaced patella, respectively. In studies excluding those with arthritic patellae, the incidence of anterior knee pain was equivalent between groups and reoperation decreased to 1.2% vs 0% (P = .06). Patella resurfacing provided marginally improved quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) for both selective and indiscriminate patella resurfacing. When including all studies, the incremental cost per QALY was $3,032. However, when analyzing only those studies with nonarthritic patellae, the incremental cost per QALY to resurface the patella increased to $183,584. CONCLUSION Patellar resurfacing remains a controversial issue in TKA. Utilizing data from new prospective randomized studies, this analysis finds that routinely resurfacing arthritis-free patellae in TKA are not cost-effective.
Collapse
|
28
|
Vertullo CJ, Graves SE, Cuthbert AR, Lewis PL. The Effect of Surgeon Preference for Selective Patellar Resurfacing on Revision Risk in Total Knee Replacement: An Instrumental Variable Analysis of 136,116 Procedures from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2019; 101:1261-1270. [PMID: 31318805 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.18.01350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimum strategy regarding resurfacing the patella in total knee replacement (TKR) remains debated, with wide national and international variability. To minimize the confounders of a direct comparison of cases with or without resurfacing, we performed an instrumental variable analysis examining revision risk on the basis of surgeon preference for patellar resurfacing in TKR, specifically examining the subsequent patellar revision risk and all-cause revision risk among cases of surgeons preferring to perform resurfacing on a selective basis compared with those whose preference is to routinely resurface or who infrequently perform resurfacing. METHODS Data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry from 1999 to 2016 were obtained to assess the cumulative percent revision, hazard ratio, and revision diagnoses for 3 cohorts, grouped according the surgeons' patellar-resurfacing preferences: infrequently (<10% of the time), selectively (10% to <90% of the time), or routinely (≥90% of the time). To avoid confounding from implant design or surgeon performance, only minimally stabilized TKRs using hybrid or cemented fixation and performed by surgeons performing ≥50 TKR procedures per year were included. RESULTS A total of 136,116 procedures were included, with patients in all 3 cohorts having similar demographics. The selectively resurfaced cohort had a higher patellar revision risk compared with the routinely resurfaced cohort, with this risk being greatest in the first 4.5 years following the primary procedure, including 306% higher in the first 1.5 years, and remaining 50% higher after 4.5 years. In a subgroup analysis, increased revision risk was observed among males, females, those <65 years of age, and those ≥65 years of age. The infrequently resurfaced cohort had the highest risk of subsequent patellar revision, up to 482% higher, as seen in the first 1.5 years after the primary procedure, compared with the routinely resurfaced cohort. Additionally, the risk of all-cause revision was 20% higher for the selectively resurfaced cohort compared with routinely resurfaced. CONCLUSIONS Surgeons who preferred selective resurfacing of the patella had a higher risk of patellar revision than those who had preference for routine resurfacing of the patella. Overall, a greater preference for resurfacing resulted in a lower risk of patellar revision. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher J Vertullo
- Knee Research Australia, Benowa, Queensland, Australia.,Menzies Health Institute, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Stephen E Graves
- Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Alana R Cuthbert
- Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Peter L Lewis
- Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Abstract
AIMS Between 15% and 20% of patients remain dissatisfied following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The SAIPH knee system (MatOrtho, Surrey, United Kingdom) is a medial ball and socket TKA that has been designed to replicate native knee kinematics in order to maximize the range of movement, stability, and function. This system is being progressively introduced in a stepwise fashion, with this study reporting the mid-term clinical and radiological outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS A retrospective review was undertaken of the first 100 consecutive patients with five-year follow-up following SAIPH TKA performed by the senior authors. The data that were collected included the demographics of the patients, clinical findings, the rate of intraoperative ligamentous release, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS), radiological assessment, complications, and all-cause revision. Revision data were cross-checked with a national registry. RESULTS A total of 100 TKAs in 92 patients were included. Three patients died (three TKAs) and a further two TKAs were revised. Of the remaining 95 TKAs, five-year follow-up data were available for 81 TKAs (85%) in 87 patients. There were significant improvements in all PROMs and high satisfaction. The mean ROM at final follow-up was from 0° (full extension) to 124° flexion. There were seven major complications (7%): one infection, two deep vein thromboses, one cerebrovascular event, and two patients with stiffness requiring a manipulation under anaesthesia. Two patients required a lateral retinacular release to optimize patellar tracking in valgus knees; no additional ligament releases were performed in any patient. Radiological analysis demonstrated no evidence of implant-related complications. CONCLUSION These results demonstrate satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes at five years following a medial ball and socket TKA. The complication and revision rates are consistent with those previously reported for patients undergoing TKA. These results demonstrate the safety and efficacy of the SAIPH Knee TKA system and support its wider use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A M Katchky
- Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Robert Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont; Orthopaedic Surgeon, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, Vermont, USA
| | - C W Jones
- Fiona Stanley Hospital Group and Orthopaedics Western Australia; Senior Research Fellow, Curtin University, Western Australia; Senior Clinical Lecturer, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - W L Walter
- Orthopaedics and Traumatic Surgery, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia; Mater Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - A J Shimmin
- Monash University, Melbourne, Melbourne Orthopaedic Group, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Patellar Resurfacing Versus Patellar Nonreusrfacing in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Study. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPEDIC AND SPINE TRAUMA 2018. [DOI: 10.5812/jost.86061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
|
31
|
Xiao L, Shu F, Xu C, Zhang Z, Huang L, Wang X, Zhang Y. Highly selective peripheral nerve radio frequency ablation for the treatment of severe knee osteoarthritis. Exp Ther Med 2018; 16:3973-3977. [PMID: 30344675 PMCID: PMC6176136 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2018.6658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2017] [Accepted: 09/15/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The objective of the present study was to investigate the effect of highly selective peripheral nerve radiofrequency (RF) ablation for the pain caused by severe knee osteoarthritis (OA). A total of 96 patients with knee OA were randomly divided into two groups. The 49 patients in group A were treated with highly selective peripheral nerve RF ablation group and the 47 patients in group B were treated with sodium hyaluronate injection. Visual analogue scale (VAS), Lysholm knee score (LKS), and pain relief before treatment and at 3 days and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after treatment were compared. At each time point after treatment in group A, both VAS and LKS scores were significantly different compared with before treatment (P<0.05). At 3 days, and at 3 and 6 months after treatment in group B, VAS scores were significantly different from before treatment (P<0.05) and at 9 and 12 months after treatment, the scores were not significantly different from those before treatment. In addition, LKS scores were only significantly different at 3 months after treatment compared with before treatment (P<0.05) and not significantly different after that time point. Furthermore, compared with group B, the rates of effective pain relief in group A were significantly higher at each time point after treatment (P<0.05). Compared with sodium hyaluronate injection, highly selective peripheral nerve RF ablation of the knee was more effective, easy to operate and had no significant adverse effects for the treatment of knee OA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lin Xiao
- Department of Pain Management, The First People's Hospital of Jingzhou, Jingzhou, Hubei 434000, P.R. China
| | - Fangwu Shu
- Department of Pain Management, Jiangling County People's Hospital, Jiangling, Hubei 434100, P.R. China
| | - Cheng Xu
- Department of Pain Management, The First People's Hospital of Jingzhou, Jingzhou, Hubei 434000, P.R. China
| | - Zhonggui Zhang
- Department of Pain Management, The First People's Hospital of Jingzhou, Jingzhou, Hubei 434000, P.R. China
| | - Liang Huang
- Department of Pain Management, The First People's Hospital of Jingzhou, Jingzhou, Hubei 434000, P.R. China
| | - Xianmo Wang
- Clinical Laboratory, The First People's Hospital of Jingzhou, Jingzhou, Hubei 434000, P.R. China
| | - Yan Zhang
- Ear, Nose, Throat and Head Neck Surgery Department, The First People's Hospital of Jingzhou, Jingzhou, Hubei 434000, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Survival of cruciate-retaining (CR) TKA is generally good, but there may be important differences in survivorship among devices, and different designs may not all be equally patellar-friendly. Large registry databases are needed to identify small but important differences between devices. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES The purposes of this study were (1) to assess the long-term survivorship of the most common CR TKA devices with revision for any reason as the endpoint and compare the revision risk of these devices after controlling for the potentially confounding variables of age, sex, hospital volume, and primary diagnosis; and (2) to analyze these same devices with revision for secondary resurfacing of the patella as a separate endpoint. METHODS Data were collected from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Over 95% of all primary TKAs are captured in the Finnish Register. We assessed Kaplan-Meier (KM) survivorship for each of the four most frequently used CR TKA designs used between years 2005 and 2015: Triathlon CR (n = 34,337), Nexgen CR Flex (n = 15,723), PFC Sigma CR (n = 15,541), and Vanguard CR (n = 9461), with revision for any reason as the endpoint. Revision was defined as a reoperation in which at least one of the components was exchanged (including insert exchange). Revisions in which the patella was not resurfaced at the primary operation and was resurfaced in the revision were studied as a separate endpoint. The mean followup times were 4.0 (range, 0-11.0) years for Triathlon CR, 3.8 (range, 0-11.0) years for Nexgen CR Flex, 5.1 (range, 0-11.0 ) years for PFC Sigma CR, and 4.9 (range, 0-10.9) years for Vanguard CR (p < 0.001). The group demographics were clinically comparable. We compared the risk of revision of these devices in the Cox multiple regression model with adjustment for hospital volume, age, sex, and primary diagnosis. There were some differences in the incidence of patellar resurfacing at the time of index arthroplasty (Nexgen CR flex 18.7%, PFC Sigma CR 18.4%, Triathlon CR 11.3%, Vanguard CR 14.4%), which was controlled by the Cox model. Implant survival analyses for Triathlon CR, Nexgen CR Flex, and PFC Sigma CR were also performed at the hospital level for the 25 largest TKA providers in Finland. RESULTS The overall 10-year KM survivorships were 96% (95% confidence interval [CI], 95-96) for Nexgen CR Flex, 96% (95% CI, 96-97) for PFC Sigma CR, 94% (95% CI, 93-95) for Triathlon CR, and 94% (95% CI, 93-95) for Vanguard CR. After controlling for potential confounding variables like age, sex, hospital volume, and primary diagnosis, both Triathlon CR (hazard ratio [HR], 1.4; 95% CI, 1.2-1.6; p < 0.01) and Vanguard CR (HR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.2-1.6; p < 0.01) had an increased risk for revision compared with the Nexgen CR Flex (the reference device). When revision with patellar resurfacing served as the endpoint, after controlling for those same confounding variables, Triathlon CR had a higher risk for revision than Nexgen CR Flex (HR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.4-2.2; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Despite slight differences among the studied devices, the overall 10-year survivorship of the current devices studied was good. However, there were differences in implant survival between the study devices, especially when revision for late patellar resurfacing was analyzed. Further studies adjusted for additional hospital and surgeon variables will be needed to examine and confirm our results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III, therapeutic study.
Collapse
|
33
|
Tang XB, Wang J, Dong PL, Zhou R. A Meta-Analysis of Patellar Replacement in Total Knee Arthroplasty for Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis. J Arthroplasty 2018; 33:960-967. [PMID: 29191443 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.10.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2017] [Revised: 10/03/2017] [Accepted: 10/03/2017] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This meta-analysis (MA) aims at comparing the clinical outcomes of resurfacing and nonresurfacing the patella in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. METHODS Randomized controlled trials were included by retrieving data from electronic English databases. Both fixed and random-effects models were employed, and standardized mean difference and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Stata13.1 software was used for statistical analysis for all the studies included to compare the differences in improving Knee Society Clinical Score and Knee Society Function Score as well as the reduction in rates of infection, reoperation, and anterior knee pain. RESULTS A total of 394 studies were initially included in this MA. About 20 randomized controlled trials which met the inclusion criteria were finally enrolled in this MA. The results of our MA showed that the reoperation rate of the patellar resurfacing group was lower than that of the nonresurfacing group. The subgroup analysis was performed according to the follow-up time and revealed that the increase in the Knee Society Clinical Score was higher in the patellar resurfacing group than that in the nonresurfacing group in the follow-up period of 1 to 2 years. The risk of reoperation rate was lower in the patellar resurfacing group than that in the nonresurfacing group, while there were no statistical differences in the follow-up time over 2 years. CONCLUSION Our study suggests that during the follow-up of 1 to 2 years, patellar resurfacing can significantly increase the Knee Society Clinical Score and reduce the reoperative rates in patients with knee osteoarthritis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao-Bo Tang
- Department of Orthopedics, Jianhu People's Hospital of Jiangsu Province, Jianhu, P.R. China
| | - Jian Wang
- Department of Orthopedics, Jianhu People's Hospital of Jiangsu Province, Jianhu, P.R. China
| | - Pei-Long Dong
- Department of Orthopedics, Jianhu People's Hospital of Jiangsu Province, Jianhu, P.R. China
| | - Rong Zhou
- Science and Education Section, Jianhu People's Hospital of Jiangsu Province, Jianhu, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Patellar Resurfacing in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Arthroplasty 2018; 33:620-632. [PMID: 29032861 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.08.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2017] [Revised: 08/02/2017] [Accepted: 08/29/2017] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty remains controversial. The aim of this study is to evaluate this technique through an analysis of comparative studies in the current literature. METHODS We performed a comprehensive search of PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane, CINAHL, and EMBASE databases using various combinations of the keywords "Knee," "Replacement," "Prosthesis," "Patella," "Resurfacing," and "Arthroplasty." All articles relevant to the subject were retrieved, and their bibliographies were hand searched for further references relevant to primary patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty. Only articles published in peer-reviewed journals were included in this systematic review. RESULTS The percentage for a reoperation was 1% for the patellar resurfacing group (17/1636) and 6.9% for the non-resurfacing group (118/1699) (odds ratio [OR] 0.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.11-0.29, P < .00001). The patellar resurfacing group showed a significantly higher postop Knee Society Score (KSS) pain (OR 1.52, 95% CI 0.68-2.35, P = .004) and postop Hospital for Special Surgery score (OR 4.35, 95% CI 3.21-5.49, P < .00001), over the non-resurfacing group. CONCLUSION Based on the outcome scores of KSS (pain), KSS (function), and Hospital for Special Surgery postop, patellar resurfacing TKAs have performed better than non-resurfaced TKAs. The lower secondary operation and revision rates for patellar resurfaced TKAs also demonstrate that this technique is the more effective option. However, the full impact of patellar resurfacing still needs to be critically evaluated by larger randomized controlled trials with long-term follow-up.
Collapse
|