Internal fixation of 410 cervical hip fractures. A randomized comparison of a single nail versus two hook-pins

Surgical interventions for treating intracapsular hip fractures in older adults: a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Hip fractures are a major healthcare problem, presenting a considerable challenge and burden to individuals and healthcare systems. The number of hip fractures globally is rising rapidly. The majority of intracapsular hip fractures are treated surgically.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the relative effects (benefits and harms) of all surgical treatments used in the management of intracapsular hip fractures in older adults, using a network meta-analysis of randomised trials, and to generate a hierarchy of interventions according to their outcomes.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and five other databases in July 2020. We also searched clinical trials databases, conference proceedings, reference lists of retrieved articles and conducted backward-citation searches.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs comparing different treatments for fragility intracapsular hip fractures in older adults. We included total hip arthroplasties (THAs), hemiarthroplasties (HAs), internal fixation, and non-operative treatments. We excluded studies of people with hip fracture with specific pathologies other than osteoporosis or resulting from high-energy trauma.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed studies for inclusion. One review author completed data extraction which was checked by a second review author. We collected data for three outcomes at different time points: mortality and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) - both reported within 4 months, at 12 months, and after 24 months of surgery, and unplanned return to theatre (at end of study follow-up). We performed a network meta-analysis (NMA) with Stata software, using frequentist methods, and calculated the differences between treatments using risk ratios (RRs) and standardised mean differences (SMDs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We also performed direct comparisons using the same codes.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 119 studies (102 RCTS, 17 quasi-RCTs) with 17,653 participants with 17,669 intracapsular fractures in the review; 83% of fractures were displaced. The mean participant age ranged from 60 to 87 years and 73% were women.  After discussion with clinical experts, we selected 12 nodes that represented the best balance between clinical plausibility and efficiency of the networks: cemented modern unipolar HA, dynamic fixed angle plate, uncemented first-generation bipolar HA, uncemented modern bipolar HA, cemented modern bipolar HA, uncemented first-generation unipolar HA, uncemented modern unipolar HA, THA with single articulation, dual-mobility THA, pins, screws, and non-operative treatment. Seventy-five studies (with 11,855 participants) with data for at least two of these treatments contributed to the NMA. We selected cemented modern unipolar HA as a reference treatment against which other treatments were compared. This was a common treatment in the networks, providing a clinically appropriate comparison. In order to provide a concise summary of the results, we report only network estimates when there was evidence of difference between treatments. We downgraded the certainty of the evidence for serious and very serious risks of bias and when estimates included possible transitivity, particularly for internal fixation which included more undisplaced fractures. We also downgraded for incoherence, or inconsistency in indirect estimates, although this affected few estimates. Most estimates included the possibility of benefits and harms, and we downgraded the evidence for these treatments for imprecision.  We found that cemented modern unipolar HA, dynamic fixed angle plate and pins seemed to have the greatest likelihood of reducing mortality at 12 months. Overall, 23.5% of participants who received the reference treatment died within 12 months of surgery. Uncemented modern bipolar HA had higher mortality than the reference treatment (RR 1.37, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.85; derived only from indirect evidence; low-certainty evidence), and THA with single articulation also had higher mortality (network estimate RR 1.62, 95% CI 1.13 to 2.32; derived from direct evidence from 2 studies with 225 participants, and indirect evidence; very low-certainty evidence). In the remaining treatments, the certainty of the evidence ranged from low to very low, and we noted no evidence of any differences in mortality at 12 months.  We found that THA (single articulation), cemented modern bipolar HA and uncemented modern bipolar HA seemed to have the greatest likelihood of improving HRQoL at 12 months. This network was comparatively sparse compared to other outcomes and the certainty of the evidence of differences between treatments was very low. We noted no evidence of any differences in HRQoL at 12 months, although estimates were imprecise. We found that arthroplasty treatments seemed to have a greater likelihood of reducing unplanned return to theatre than internal fixation and non-operative treatment. We estimated that 4.3% of participants who received the reference treatment returned to theatre during the study follow-up. Compared to this treatment, we found low-certainty evidence that more participants returned to theatre if they were treated with a dynamic fixed angle plate (network estimate RR 4.63, 95% CI 2.94 to 7.30; from direct evidence from 1 study with 190 participants, and indirect evidence). We found very low-certainty evidence that more participants returned to theatre when treated with pins (RR 4.16, 95% CI 2.53 to 6.84; only from indirect evidence), screws (network estimate RR 5.04, 95% CI 3.25 to 7.82; from direct evidence from 2 studies with 278 participants, and indirect evidence), and non-operative treatment (RR 5.41, 95% CI 1.80 to 16.26; only from indirect evidence). There was very low-certainty evidence of a tendency for an increased risk of unplanned return to theatre for all of the arthroplasty treatments, and in particular for THA, compared with cemented modern unipolar HA, with little evidence to suggest the size of this difference varied strongly between the arthroplasty treatments.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There was considerable variability in the ranking of each treatment such that there was no one outstanding, or subset of outstanding, superior treatments. However, cemented modern arthroplasties tended to more often yield better outcomes than alternative treatments and may be a more successful approach than internal fixation. There is no evidence of a difference between THA (single articulation) and cemented modern unipolar HA in the outcomes measured in this review. THA may be an appropriate treatment for a subset of people with intracapsular fracture but we have not explored this further.

Internal fixation implants for intracapsular hip fractures in older adults

BACKGROUND

Hip fractures are a major healthcare problem, presenting a huge challenge and burden to patients, healthcare systems and society. The increased proportion of older adults in the world population means that the absolute number of hip fractures is rising rapidly across the globe. The majority of hip fractures are treated surgically. This review evaluates evidence for types of internal fixation implants used in joint-preserving surgery for intracapsular hip fractures.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the relative effects (benefits and harms) of different implants for the internal fixation of intracapsular hip fractures in older adults.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Epistemonikos, Proquest Dissertations and Theses, and National Technical Information Service in July 2020. We also searched clinical trials databases, conference proceedings, reference lists of retrieved articles and conducted backward-citation searches.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs comparing implants used for internal fixation of fragility intracapsular proximal femoral fractures in older adults. Types of implants were smooth pins (these include pins with fold-out hooks), screws, or fixed angle plates. We excluded studies in which all or most fractures were caused by specific pathologies other than osteoporosis or were the result of a high energy trauma.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed studies for inclusion. One review author extracted data and assessed risk of bias which was checked by a second review author. We collected data for seven outcomes: activities of daily living (ADL), delirium, functional status, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), mobility, mortality (reported within four months of surgery as early mortality, and at 12 months since surgery), and unplanned return to theatre for treating a complication resulting directly or indirectly from the primary procedure (such as deep infection or non-union). We assessed the certainty of the evidence for these outcomes using GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 38 studies (32 RCTs, six quasi-RCTs) with 8585 participants with 8590 intracapsular fractures. The mean ages of participants in the studies ranged from 60 to 84 years; 73% were women, and 38% of fractures were undisplaced. We report here the findings of the four main comparisons, which were between different categories of implants. We downgraded the certainty of the outcomes for imprecision (when data were available from insufficient numbers of participants or the confidence interval (CI) was wide), study limitations (e.g. high or unclear risks of bias), and inconsistency (when we noted substantial levels of statistical heterogeneity). Smooth pins versus fixed angle plate (four studies, 1313 participants) We found very low-certainty evidence of little or no difference between the two implant types in independent mobility with no more than one walking stick (1 study, 112 participants), early mortality (1 study, 383 participants), mortality at 12 months (2 studies, 661 participants), and unplanned return to theatre (3 studies, 736 participants). No studies reported on ADL, delirium, functional status, or HRQoL. Screws versus fixed angle plates (11 studies, 2471 participants) We found low-certainty evidence of no clinically important differences between the two implant types in functional status using WOMAC (MD -3.18, 95% CI -6.35 to -0.01; 2 studies, 498 participants; range of scores from 0 to 96, lower values indicate better function), and HRQoL using EQ-5D (MD 0.03, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.06; 2 studies, 521 participants; range -0.654 (worst), 0 (dead), 1 (best)). We also found low-certainty evidence showing little or no difference between the two implant types in mortality at 12 months (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.31; 7 studies, 1690 participants), and unplanned return to theatre (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.26; 11 studies, 2321 participants). We found very low-certainty evidence of little or no difference between the two implant types in independent mobility (1 study, 70 participants), and early mortality (3 studies, 467 participants). No studies reported on ADL or delirium. Screws versus smooth pins (seven studies, 1119 participants) We found low-certainty evidence of no or little difference between the two implant types in mortality at 12 months (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.35; 6 studies, 1005 participants; low-certainty evidence). We found very low-certainty evidence of little or no difference between the two implant types in early mortality (3 studies, 584 participants) and unplanned return to theatre (5 studies, 862 participants). No studies reported on ADL, delirium, functional status, HRQoL, or mobility. Screws or smooth pins versus fixed angle plates (15 studies, 3784 participants) In this comparison, we combined data from the first two comparison groups. We found low-certainty evidence of no or little difference between the two groups of implants in mortality at 12 months (RR 1.04, 95% CI.083 to 1.31; 7 studies, 1690 participants) and unplanned return to theatre (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.18; 14 studies, 3057 participants). We found very low-certainty evidence of little or no difference between the two groups of implants in independent mobility (2 studies, 182 participants), and early mortality (4 studies, 850 participants). We found no additional evidence to support the findings for functional status or HRQoL as reported in 'Screws versus fixed angle plates'. No studies reported ADL or delirium.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is low-certainty evidence that there may be little or no difference between screws and fixed angle plates in functional status, HRQoL, mortality at 12 months, or unplanned return to theatre; and between screws and pins in mortality at 12 months. The limited and very low-certainty evidence for the outcomes for which data were available for the smooth pins versus fixed angle plates comparison, as well as the other outcomes for which data were available for the screws and fixed angle plates, and screws and pins comparisons means we have very little confidence in the estimates of effect for these outcomes. Additional RCTs would increase the certainty of the evidence. We encourage such studies to report outcomes consistent with the core outcome set for hip fracture, including long-term quality of life indicators such as ADL and mobility.

Outcomes of nondisplaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures with internal screw fixation in elderly patients: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Although the preferred treatment for displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly is hip arthroplasty, the treatment for impacted or undisplaced femoral neck fractures (UFNF) is still a subject of controversy. Our purpose was to systematically review studies of elderly patients with UFNF treated with internal fixation using screws: (i) what is the reported mortality; (ii) what is the reoperation rate; (iii) what are the clinical and radiological outcomes; and (iv) what is the methodological quality of the included studies?

METHODS

This systematic review was performed through a search of PubMed and the Cochrane database using a structured search algorithm including studies enrolling patients older than 60 years old, with UFNF treated with internal fixation using screws. Our literature search returned 950 studies and 11 were selected for final abstraction.

RESULTS

6 studies reported mortality rate. At 1-year follow-up mortality was reported by 3 studies: 18.8%; 22%, and 19%. At 5 years, 1 study reported mortality rate of 42%. Overall reoperation rate was reported by 9 studies and ranged from 8%-19%, while conversion to hip arthroplasty was performed in the range between 8% and 16% according to 6 studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Internal fixation with cannulated screws for UFNF in the elderly is a valuable option, although it has substantial reoperation and mortality rates. Further prospective high-quality, randomised controlled trials are required to establish the optimal approach for the treatment of UFNF.

Outcome of undisplaced and moderately displaced femoral neck fractures

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment for femoral neck fracture is a matter of controversy. We compared the outcome of displaced fractures with good healing potential (moderately displaced fractures) to the outcome of undisplaced fractures treated by internal fixation with 2 parallel screws.

METHODS

In a consecutive series of hip fracture patients, the rates of reoperation and mortality for 225 undisplaced fractures were compared to those for 241 moderately displaced fractures. The patients were followed for 1-6 years.

RESULTS

The total rate of reoperation was 19% (9% because of healing complications) for the undisplaced fractures and 33% (20% because of healing complications) for the moderately displaced fractures. Fracture displacement was the main predictor of reoperation. There was no difference in mortality between the groups, and patient-related background parameters (rather than fracture displacement) were the main predictors of mortality.

INTERPRETATION

Undisplaced fractures should be treated by internal fixation. The best treatment for moderately displaced fractures remains to be determined.

A randomised study in all cervical hip fractures osteosynthesis with Hansson hook-pins versus AO-screws in 199 consecutive patients followed for two years

A consecutive series of patients with all types of cervical hip fracture (both undisplaced and displaced) were randomised to osteosynthesis with Hansson hook-pins (n = 98) or AO-screws (n = 101). Background parameters, fracture type and reduction of the fracture did not differ significantly between the groups. Fifty-seven percent of the patients were operated on within 6 h of admission to hospital, 74% within 12 h and 92% within 24 h. The mean (median) time for operation was 36 (30) min for the hook-pins and 40 (35) min for the AO-screws. The devices were significantly better positioned in the hook-pin group (81% of cases good) compared to the AO-screws (66% good) (p = 0.04). In all, 72% of the patients had no deficiency either in reduction of the fracture, positioning of the implants or had drill penetration of the femoral head. Direct unrestricted weight bearing was encouraged in 92% of the hook-pin and 90% of the AO-screws group. The mean (median) hospital time was 13 (10) days with no significant difference between the groups. Following treatment, 5% walked without aids, 76% of the patients walked with some aids, and 16% could not walk. The walking ability was not known for 4%. At four months, 59% of the patients were living in their own home (64% before fracture), 18% (25% before) in a nursing home, 5% (11% before) in other accommodation and 18% were dead. After two years, 77% of the hook-pin patients had not needed any re-operation compared to 73% in the AO-screw group. In total a secondary hemi-arthroplasty had been performed in 7% and total hip arthroplasty in 12% of the patients. Extraction only of osteosynthesis material had been performed in 5%. The difference in the reoperation rates between the two methods was not significant. In the undisplaced fractures, 84% of the patients had not needed any reoperation after two years compared to 70% among the displaced fractures. Major reoperation had been performed in 10% (1% hemi and 9% total hip arthroplasty) in the patients with undisplaced fractures compared to 26% in those with displaced fractures (10% hemi, 16% total hip arthroplasty and 1% Girdlestone operation). The remaining patients had only undergone removal of metalwork. Osteosynthesis thus proved to be a successful operation in many of the patients with displaced fractures. A preoperative, prognostic-based selection between osteosynthesis and arthroplasty is the future goal for optimised femoral neck fracture treatment.

Responsiveness of the EuroQol (EQ 5-D) and the SF-36 in elderly patients with displaced femoral neck fractures

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the responsiveness of the EuroQol (EQ-5D) and Short-Form 36 (SF-36) instruments, i.e. their ability to capture clinically important changes, in elderly patients with a displaced femoral neck fracture. The study was part of a prospective randomised study comparing two different surgical procedures, internal fixation (IF) and total hip replacement (THP).

SETTING

University hospital.

PATIENTS

A total of 110 patients, mean age 80 years with an acute displaced femoral neck fracture (Garden III and IV). The inclusion criteria were age > or = 70, absence of severe cognitive dysfunction, independent living status and independent walking capability.

INTERVENTION

The patients were randomised to IF or to a THR.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Health-related quality of life according to EQ-5D and SF-36. Responsiveness measured by the ability of the EQ-5D and the SF-36 to detect clinically relevant differences in the study population according to an external criterion (EC) for outcome (good or less good clinical outcome). Responsiveness was measured in terms of change scores, standardised effect size (SES) and standardised response mean (SRM).

RESULTS

The rated prefracture EQ-5D(index) scores and SF-36 scores showed good correspondence with the scores of age-matched Swedish reference populations. The relationship between the EC and EQ-5D(index) score and the SF-36 global score showed significant differences in both comparisons (p < 0.001). The responsiveness expressed with the SES and SRM were large for both the EQ-5D (1.37 and 0.90, respectively) and for the SF-36 global score (0.89 and 0.82, respectively). The correlation between the change scores for the SF-36 global score and the EQ-5D was 0.39 (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The results showed high responsiveness for both the EQ-5D and the SF-36, indicating that both instruments are suitable for use as outcome measures in clinical trials in elderly hip fracture patients.

Femoral neck fractures in the elderly: functional outcome and quality of life according to EuroQol

The main purpose of this prospective study was to investigate the functional outcome and health-related quality of life according to EuroQol (EQ-5D) after a femoral neck fracture treated with internal fixation in relatively healthy elderly patients. We also aimed to validate the use of the EQ-5D in routine clinical follow-ups of this group of patients. The inclusion criteria were more than 65 years of age, absence of severe cognitive dysfunction, living independently, and unhindered walking ability preoperatively. The mean follow-up period was 17 months. The rated prefracture EQ-5Dindex scores showed good correspondence with the scores of an age-matched Swedish reference population. The EQ-5Dindex scores decreased from 0.78 before the fracture (based on recall) to 0.59 at 4 months and 0.51 at 17 months after surgery. The decrease was significantly larger among patients with fracture healing complications. There was a good correlation between the EQ-5Dindex scores and other outcome measures such as pain, mobility, independence in ADL and independent living status. The questionnaire response rate (EQ-5D) was 89-100% on different follow-up occasions. The EQ-5D appears to be an easy-to use instrument even for elderly patients with femoral neck fractures. Changes in the quality of life may be useful to identify patients who might benefit from reoperation, i.e. arthroplasty. The EQ-5D also appears to be a relevant clinical end-point in outcome studies.

Quality of life related to fracture displacement among elderly patients with femoral neck fractures treated with internal fixation

OBJECTIVE

To determine differences in outcome between undisplaced (Garden I and II) and displaced (Garden III and IV) femoral neck fractures in elderly patients treated with internal fixation.

SETTING

University hospital.

DESIGN

Prospective clinical study.

PATIENTS

Ninety patients with an acute femoral neck fracture after a fall. The inclusion criteria were age older than sixty-five years, absence of severe cognitive dysfunction, independent living, and unhindered walking capability preoperatively. The mean follow-up was twenty-six months.

INTERVENTION

The patients were treated with closed reduction and percutaneous internal fixation with two cannulated screws.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Fracture healing complications, pain (visual analogue scale), walking capability, activities of daily living, and quality of life according to EuroQol.

RESULTS

The rate of fracture healing complications in displaced femoral neck fractures in patients available at the final follow-up was 36 percent compared with 7 percent in patients with undisplaced fractures. The quality of life, according to EuroQol, of patients with uneventfully healed fractures was significantly lower in patients with primarily displaced fractures (0.51) than in patients with undisplaced ones (0.76).

CONCLUSION

There was a major difference in outcome on comparing undisplaced and displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients treated with internal fixation. The rate of fracture healing complications in patients with undisplaced fractures was low, and patients with healed fractures regained their prefracture quality of life level. The rate of fracture healing complications and reoperations in patients with displaced fractures was high, and even in patients with uneventfully healed fractures, there was a substantial decrease in the quality of life.

Internal fixation implants for intracapsular proximal femoral fractures in adults

BACKGROUND

Numerous different implants with screws, pins and side plates have been used for the internal fixation of intracapsular hip fractures.

OBJECTIVES

To determine from randomised trials which implant is superior for the internal fixation of intracapsular proximal femoral fractures.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Injuries Group specialised register. The date of the most recent search was December 2000.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised and quasi-randomised trials comparing different implants for the internal fixation of intracapsular hip fractures in adults.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently assessed trial quality, by use of a ten item scale, and extracted data. Additional information was sought from trialists. After grouping by implant type, comparable groups of trials were subgrouped and where appropriate, data were pooled using the fixed effects model.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty-seven studies involving 5269 participants (5274 fractures) were included in the study. Considerable variation in the quality of methodology between studies was found and biases due to familiarity with some of the implants were noted. None of the implants tested were found to be significantly superior for any of the outcome measures related to fracture healing complications or mortality. The sliding hip screw was found to take longer to insert and to have an increased operative blood loss compared with multiple screws or pins.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

No clear conclusions can be made on the choice of implant for internal fixation of intracapsular fractures from the available evidence within randomised trials.

Internal fixation versus total hip arthroplasty in the treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures: a prospective randomized study of 100 hips

100 patients 75 years or older, with displaced femoral neck fractures, were randomly assigned to osteosynthesis with two parallel and percutaneously inserted screws (Olmed) or total hip arthroplasty (Lubinus IP). Mean age was 84 (75-101) years, 74% were women and 45% had mental dysfunction. General complications were commoner in the arthroplasty group but the mortality rates did not differ. In the osteosynthesis group, fracture complications were seen in 27/50 hips. In the arthroplasty group, dislocation was the main complication and occurred in 11/50 cases. At 3 months and after 1 year, the Harris Hip Scores were significantly better in the arthroplasty group. When mental dysfunction was present, the dislocation rate after arthroplasty was 32%, whereas the reoperation rate after osteosynthesis was 5%. The opposite pattern of complications was found in patients with normal mental function, 12% versus 60%. The 2-year mortality rate among those with mental dysfunction was 26/45, compared to 7/55 of those with normal function (p < 0.001). We conclude that total hip arthroplasty should be considered for a displaced femoral neck fracture in old patients with normal mental function and high functional demands.

An algorithm for preoperative prediction of reoperation risk after internal fixation of femoral neck fractures

An algorithm was designed for preoperative prediction of the risk for reoperation, and the mortality risk, after internal fixation of femoral neck fractures. Out of 51 reviewed studies of femoral neck fractures, eight met specified inclusion criteria such as low dropout rates, a minimum of ten surgeons performing the surgery, a minimum of 2 years follow-up, and a standard age, sex, and Garden class distribution. Five of these studies were used for the construction of the algorithm, and the remaining three for testing the specificity and sensitivity of the algorithm. A separate analysis of the influence of age on the reoperation rate was also performed. In the analysis of 399 reviewed cases of femoral neck fractures, the specificity for the algorithm in predicting the risk for reoperation was 96%, and the sensitivity was 51%. The positive predictive value for the algorithm in predicting the risk for reoperation was 77%, which was three times higher compared to the commonly used predictors age and Garden class (positive predictive value 25%). For prediction of the mortality risk the positive predictive value for-the algorithm was 57%.

Biases in a randomized comparison of three types of screw fixation in displaced femoral neck fractures

We studied fixation of displaced femoral neck fractures prospectively in a randomized multicenter study, comparing 2 Olmed screws, 2 Tronzo screws and 3 Ullevaal hip screws. The study population consisted of 482 women and 125 men, of whom 432 women and 100 men were older than 65 years of age. Their median age was 80 (54-97) years. Despite agreement on criteria, the rates of reoperations for pain and failure--salvage (prosthesis replacement) and other reoperations (removal of implant)--differed significantly between the 3 hospitals regardless of type of fixation. In total, the percentages of salvage operations were: Olmed screw 17/175, Tronzo 17/130 and Ullevaal screw 11/302 (n.s.); the percentages of other reoperations were 11, 6 and 13, respectively (n.s.). In the whole series, the 2-year rate of salvage operations was 14%. No differences between the implants were found in patients older than 65 years of age. We conclude that an agreed, common definition of a hard end-point (reoperation) does not ensure comparability of results, because of differences in clinical decision making.

Choice of implant for internal fixation of femoral neck fractures. Meta-analysis of 25 randomised trials including 4,925 patients

We reviewed all randomised trials comparing different implants for treating intracapsular fractures of the hip and, where possible, the data were combined. 25 randomised trials were identified involving 4,925 patients. Screws appeared to be superior to pins. It was not possible to determine the optimum number or type of screws. No advantage was shown for an implant with a side-plate.

Bone and muscle mass after femoral neck fracture. A controlled quantitative computed tomography study of osteosynthesis versus primary total hip arthroplasty

The cortical bone mineral density (BMD), bone volume, bone mass and muscle volume of the thigh, and the BMD of the distal femur and proximal tibia were measured quantified by quantitative computed tomography (QCT) after an operation for a displaced femoral neck fracture. Twenty patients were randomized to osteosynthesis or total hip arthroplasty (THA). Both legs were scanned after 18 months, and the operated side was compared with the healthy side. Clinical assessment was performed with a Harris hip score. A reference group of 9 patients, who had undergone THA because of arthrosis, was chosen. In the fracture patients, we found a 9% decrease in bone mass and muscle volume of the middle femur. The BMD of the distal femur and proximal tibia showed a more marked osteopenia. There was no difference in these parameters between the two groups. In the reference group of operated arthrosis patients, we did not find any differences between sides postoperatively. After the operation, the fracture patients had a lower Harris score than the arthrosis patients, and this was most pronounced among those who had undergone osteosynthesis. The finding of a marked osteopenia after a femoral neck fracture, irrespective of treatment, but no bone loss after THA because of arthrosis, implies that patients with a femoral neck fracture are more sensitive to osteopenia, and that the bone loss is not proportional to the operative trauma.

Non-operative or operative treatment for undisplaced femoral neck fractures: a comparative study of 122 non-operative and 125 operatively treated cases

We present a series of 247 undisplaced femoral neck fractures, of which 122 were primarily treated non-operatively, and 125 with primary operative stabilization. The background parameters did not differ significantly in the two groups. The length of hospitalization was 1 week shorter in the operatively treated group. They started to walk bearing full weight at an average of 11 days earlier. Two-thirds of the operatively treated but only one-quarter of the non-operatively treated patients were able to walk alone when they left hospital. General complications were recorded in 19 of the non-operatively and in four of the operatively treated patients during their hospitalization. Early displacement (within 6 weeks) was noted in 20 per cent of the non-operatively treated patients who required late operation. However, there was no early displacement in the operatively treated group. We therefore recommend primary operative stabilization of undisplaced femoral neck fractures.

Social function after cervical hip fracture. A comparison of hook-pins and total hip replacement in 47 patients

47 patients with a cervical hip fracture Garden 3 or 4 and fully ambulatory before the fracture, were randomized to either fixation with Hansson hook-pins (24 patients, median age 79 years) or to a Charnley hip replacement (23 patients, median age 80 years). The patients were followed for 2 years. Social function was evaluated using a standard questionnaire. There were no postoperative deaths and no significant differences in hospital stay. 9/24 patients treated with hook-pins developed healing complications and 2 dislocations occurred in the THR group. After 1 and 2 years, fewer patients treated with hip replacement used outdoor walking aids; they were also more likely to do their own shopping. Hip replacement is a good choice when treating healthy older people with displaced cervical hip fractures, when primary mortality is expected to be low and the risk of healing complications after nailing is high.

Fixation of femoral neck fracture. A randomized 2-year follow-up study of hook pins and sliding screw plate in 222 patients

We compared fixation with hook pins or sliding screw plate in a prospective randomized study of 222 patients with a cervical hip fracture. Radiographic evidence of early redisplacement, nonunion, or late segmental collapse was found in 43 of 122 patients operated on with two hook pins and in 40 of 100 patients operated on with the sliding screw plate. According to the actuarial method, the failure rate after 2 years was 38% with hook pins and 46% with screw plates, which not is a significant difference. Due to early redisplacement, reoperation with an endoprosthesis was performed within 0.5 (2) years in 11 (22) patients in the hook-pin group and in 4 (17) patients in the sliding-screw plate group.

Radiographic prediction of failure after fixation of cervical hip fracture

During 1984-1985, 410 patients with cervical hip fracture were randomized between 2 methods of internal fixation--a single nail (Rydell) or 2 LIH hook pins (LIH). The patients were followed-up prospectively for at least 2 years. Radiographs were taken after 1 week, 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. The radiographs of the 295 patients alive 2 years postoperatively were examined by one of the authors. The sliding and the diversion of the pins and the nail in the anteroposterior projection and the diversion in the lateral projection were measured. In the failure group (non-union, late segmental collapse), the greatest sliding was noted within 1 month postoperatively and the diversion increased up to 3 months. Significant differences between the failure and the non-failure groups could be seen even after 1 week. We also found that the degree of sliding of the LIH pins and the Rydell nail 1 month postoperatively is comparable to the scintigraphic pattern 2 weeks postoperatively in predicting failure after internal fixation of cervical hip fractures.

An algorithm for assessment of fracture displacement and pin positions in femoral neck fractures

A method for determination of both the displacement of the femoral head and the position of the fixation device in fixed femoral neck fractures is described. In routine AP and lateral radiographs of the hip, measurements are made of femoral neck-shaft angle, the diameter of the femoral head and neck, the distances from the center of the femoral head to the femoral neck axis and the distances from the femoral neck axis to the fixating screws. From these values the position of the femoral head and the fixating screws are determined by geometric calculations. A computer program in Q-BASIC was devised to perform the calculations and to produce graphic displays of cross-sections of the femoral head and neck, with the displacement of the head and the screw positions indicated. The accuracy of the method was evaluated by a new method using axial radiographs of hip specimens, which were compared with the computer-plotted graphs of the femoral head and neck. The mean error of the method was found to be +/- 5% of the femoral head diameter, approximately 2.5 mm.

Outcomes after displaced fractures of the femoral neck. A meta-analysis of one hundred and six published reports

Methods of meta-analysis, a technique for the combination of data from multiple sources, were applied to analyze 106 reports of the treatment of displaced fractures of the femoral neck. Two years or less after primary internal fixation of a displaced fracture of the femoral neck, a non-union had developed in 33 per cent of the patients and avascular necrosis, in 16 per cent. The rate of performance of a second operation within two years ranged from 20 to 36 per cent after internal fixation and from 6 to 18 per cent after hemiarthroplasty (relative risk, 2.6; 95 per cent confidence interval, 1.4 to 4.6). Conversion to an arthroplasty was the most common reoperation after internal fixation and accounted for about two-thirds of these procedures. The remaining one-third of the reoperations were for removal of the implant or revision of the internal fixation. For the patients who had had a hemiarthroplasty, the most common reoperations were conversion to a total hip replacement, removal or revision of the prosthesis, and débridement of the wound. Although we observed an increase in the rate of mortality at thirty days after primary hemiarthroplasty compared with that after primary internal fixation, the difference was not significant (p = 0.22) and did not persist beyond three months. The absolute difference in perioperative mortality between the two groups was small. An anterior operative approach for arthroplasty consistently was associated with a lower rate of mortality at two months than was a posterior approach. Some reports showed promising results after total hip replacement for displaced fractures of the femoral neck; however, randomized clinical trials are still needed to establish the value of this treatment.

Prediction of fixation failure in femoral neck fractures. Comminution and avascularity studied in 40 patients

We performed 99m-Tc diphosphonate scintimetries in 40-elderly patients who had undergone screw fixation for a recent subcapital femoral fracture and analyzed their preoperative radiographs. The data were subjected to a logistic regression analysis. Both comminution of the calcar femorale and reduced scintimetric uptake were predictive for failure of the osteosynthesis during the first year. Fracture comminution was more predictive for early failures during 3 months and scintimetry for the later failures.

Cortical screw support in femoral neck fractures. A radiographic analysis of 87 fractures with a new mensuration technique

In 87 femoral neck fractures, operated on with 2 von Bahr screws and followed for up to 2 years, the positions of the fixating screws were determined with a new mensuration technique which compensates for the variations in hip rotation in routine radiographs. The union rate of the fractures was related to the position of the screws. A posterior placement of the proximal screw and an inferior placement of the distal screw in both the femoral head and neck improved the outcome substantially.