Ultrasound measurements of the os calcis. Side differences and prediction of bone density in 39 persons

Contralateral differences in quantitative ultrasound of the heel: the importance of side in clinical practice

Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) of the heel is becoming increasingly popular for the assessment of skeletal status, although there appears to be a general lack of agreement regarding which side to measure. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate possible side differences (right versus left) in heel QUS within the general population, including children (10-15 years old, n=406), adults (26-33 years old, n=339), and elderly subjects (60-75 years old, n=455) of both genders (818 females and 382 males), and to examine the impact of these differences on prevalence estimates of osteoporosis and individual fracture risk assessment. All participants had both their heels measured twice with the Sahara device, which measures broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) and speed of sound (SOS) through the os calcis; a composite parameter, that is, quantitative ultrasound index (QUI) and an estimate of heel BMD (eBMD) were also derived. Significant side differences were detected for BUA and SOS (P<0.05), but not for QUI or eBMD. Contralateral differences were rather small in absolute terms, but were in the order of 12.6% for BUA, 0.72% for SOS, 7.9% for QUI, and 9.9% for eBMD, when expressed as percentage of the mean values for the two heels. Bilateral differences appeared to vary across age and gender. Significant correlations between QUS indices of the right and left heel were observed (r=0.75-0.85; P<0.001), which seemed to be stronger among the elderly and among male individuals. Prevalence rates of osteopenia and osteoporosis were not significantly different when estimated from eBMD T-scores for the one or the other foot (chi(2)=1.781, df=2, P=0.410). However, cross-classification analysis revealed that only 84% of the subjects classified into each risk category by the two calcanei were actually the same persons. In conclusion, results from the present study strongly suggest that QUS measurements of opposite heels may not be equivalent with respect to the evaluation of bone status and classification of individual fracture risk assessment, although the degree of discrepancy appears to be related to the primary outcome of interest.

Differences between the right and the left foot in calcaneal quantitative ultrasound measurements

A total of 621 women, aged 30-80 years, who were grouped according to having single (group 1) or duplicate measurements of their both calcanei with quantitative ultrasound (QUS) on the same day (group 2) or on a different day than the first measurement (group 3) were evaluated for differences between the right and left foot. Despite similar mean values of QUS indices on both sides, individual percentage differences were found varying from 7.3 to 9.5% in the quantitative ultrasound index (QUI), from 11.1 to 12.5% in broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA), from 0.62 to 0.86% in speed of sound (SOS) and from 8.9 to 10.9% in estimated heel bone mineral density as measured using the Sahara Clinical Bone Sonometer in three groups of subjects. The percentage of subjects with a proportional difference exceeding the coefficient of variation of duplicate measurements of the same heel was the highest for BUA, varying from 63 to 76.7%, and ranged between 43.1 and 76.7% in other QUS indices. We conclude that there is a real inter-individual difference between the right and left foot in QUS parameters, whether measured once or twice or on different occasions. We recommend measuring both sides when using QUS to avoid misleading implications regarding a subject's bone status.

Evaluation of calcaneus bone densitometry against hip and spine for diagnosis of osteoporosis

Dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is now widely available as a method for assessing bone density. However, the place of peripheral bone densitometry in clinical practice for diagnosis of osteoporosis is not yet clear. To examine the potential use in our district general hospital setting, we compared calcaneus measurements with conventional DXA of the hip and spine in 100 patients referred for assessment following identification of risk factors for osteoporosis. Measurements were made on both heels and the results were found to be similar but not completely interchangeable. Use of receiver operating characteristic curves confirmed that a threshold T-score of -1.6 could be used to identify many of the high risk subjects. However, there was only moderate agreement between fracture risk classifications derived from heel T-scores, and diagnostic classification (osteoporosis/osteopenia/normal) derived from axial DXA. The specificity of heel measurements was high, but sensitivity was poorer. Heel measurements could therefore be valuable in some circumstances for finding patients for whom treatment of osteoporosis would be appropriate, such as in a population with a low prevalence of osteoporosis. They may also be of value in a population with a high prevalence of disease, particularly if there were no alternative means of bone densitometry. However, with an intermediate prevalence, the relatively high risk of false negative values would mean that false reassurance could be given to many of those classed as "low risk". This could be a major drawback in clinical practice if heel densitometry were used as the initial investigation and axial measurements were also available, since they would give conflicting results for a substantial proportion of these patients.

Ultrasound of the skeleton: review of its clinical applications and pitfalls

Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) is receiving considerable attention in the assessment of osteoporosis because of its ease of use, lack of radiation exposure, region of interest, and relatively low costs. These features have made the technique appealing for screening adult and pediatric patients. This article discusses some of the clinical applications, limitations, and strengths of QUS.

Bilateral variation in calcaneal broadband ultrasound attenuation. Part II: as measured by three bone densitometers employing ultrasound or X-ray

In previous study, we found a bilateral difference in broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) of the calcaneus, using the McCue Cubaclinical II device. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether a calcaneal bilateral difference (greater than that that would be expected from the coefficient of variation) was also found by other instruments and their technologies. Twenty-four subjects (ages 22-81) were each scanned by the same operator using three devices: the Cubaclinical (ultrasound [US], BUA), the Lunar Achilles plus (US, BUA and stiffness index), and the Pixi (dual X-ray absorptiometry, bone mineral density). To allow for the different variables used by the three devices, the following computation was applied to the data for comparison purposes (left - right) / (right). Analysis of variance showed no significant difference. We conclude that the three devices do not differ in their ability to detect a proportional difference between right and left calcanei. In an additional investigation, using the Cubaclinical, 23 subjects were scanned. The direction of the US wave between emitter and receiver transducers was reversed to determine the effect, if any, on bilateral BUA readings. In this case, the direction of the US wave was not influential.

Bilateral variation in calcaneal broadband ultrasound attenuation: part I

A total of 1412 women of various ethnic origins ages 20-80 yr were tested for bilateral calcaneal broad-band ultrasound attenuation (BUA) with the McCue Cubaclinical ultrasound bone densitometer. A significant difference was found between nondominant and dominant measures (p < 0.0001). The magnitude of calcaneal BUA was not related to dominance. The difference was of a significant degree to have resulted in differing predictions of fracture risk depending on the side used in assessment. Forty-eight subjects (3%) would have been considered at risk of osteoporotic fracture based on the nondominant measure, whereas only 21 subjects (1.5%) would have been considered to be at risk based on the dominant measure. In concurrence with other studies, we conclude that it is essential to carry out bilateral measurements of the os calcis to avoid misleading implications for prediction of fracture risk.

Quantitative ultrasound of the os calcis in postmenopausal women with spine and hip fracture

Quantitative ultrasonometry (QUS) of the os calcis has been shown to predict hip fracture in late postmenopausal women, and vertebral and forearm fracture in early postmenopausal women. Speed of sound (SOS), broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA), and stiffness index (SI) of the os calcis were measured using the Achilles ultrasonometer (Lunar, Madison, WI). Osteoporosis risk factors were assessed by a detailed questionnaire. We examined 1314 normal women from age 48 to 79 yr, with a mean age 60 +/- 7.5 yr. In addition, we examined women of similar age, of whom 80 had suffered a hip fracture and 40 a spine fracture. The short-term precision in vivo expressed as the coefficient of variation was 1.2% for BUA, 0.2% for SOS, and 1.3% for SI. A total of 813 women were measured at both the right and left heel. There was high correlation between the two sides (r = 0.80-0.93) (p < 0.001), with no systematic offset. The ultrasound variables decreased significantly (p < 0.001) with age in healthy women; the annual decrease was -0.4% for BUA, -0.07% for SOS, and -0.7% for SI. BUA, SOS and SI discriminated (p < 0.001) between fracture and non-fracture subjects, but the fracture groups were 2 to 4 yr older. The T-score in the controls averaged -2.1 while that in the fracture patients averaged about -3.0. After control for age, years since menopause, and body size, BUA, SOS as well as the SI remained significantly lower (11 to 12% for SI) in women with fracture. The Z-score was -0.8 (p < 0.01) in spine fracture cases, and -0.9 (p < 0.001) in hip fracture patients. QUS provides a gradient of fracture risk comparable to X-ray densitometry of the axial skeleton, and gives comparable Z- and T-scores in younger postmenopausal women. It provides a precise, radiation-free, low-cost, and rapid method for fracture risk assessment in clinical practice.

Comparison of calcaneal ultrasound and DXA in young women

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to assess quantitative ultrasound (QUS) parameters in collegiate female gymnasts, a population whose training incorporates high-impact loading, which is particularly osteogenic, and to determine the discriminative capacity of this relatively new radiation-free technique compared with bone densitometry in a young healthy population.

METHODS

We studied 19 collegiate gymnasts and 23 healthy controls undergoing regular weight-bearing activity, matched for age (gymnasts 19.2 +/- 1.2, controls 19.9 +/- 1.6 yr) and body weight (gymnasts 56.7 +/- 3.7, controls 57.7 +/- 7.8 kg). QUS parameters of the calcaneus (broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA), bone velocity (BV), and speed of sound (SOS)) were measured by a Walker Sonix UBA 575+. Bone mineral density (BMD; g x cm(-2)) of the lumbar spine, hip (femoral neck, trochanter, Ward's triangle) and whole body was assessed by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA, Hologic QDR 1000/W). Data analysis included unpaired two-tailed Student's t-tests, analysis of variance, Pearson product-moment, and Spearman rank-order correlations.

RESULTS

Regional and whole body BMD of gymnasts was greater than controls (P < 0.001), with the difference being 7-28%. Average QUS parameters of the right and left calcaneus were also higher (P < 0.001) in the gymnasts. BUA, BV, and SOS were significantly (P < 0.001) correlated to each bone site with r = 0.54-0.79. Analysis of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves indicated no significant difference in sensitivity and specificity for QUS and DXA measures.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that QUS parameters of the calcaneus are higher in young women gymnasts compared to individuals who undergo regular weight-bearing activity and that QUS parameters are able to discriminate between these two groups in a similar manner as does regional and whole body BMD.

Comparison of ultrasound and bone mineral density assessment of the calcaneus with different regions of interest in healthy early menopausal women

This study investigated the effect of different sized regions of interest (ROIs) on quantitative ultrasound (QUS) variables of the calcaneus. The effect on QUS of using a fixed ROI as opposed to an ROI adjusted for foot length was also assessed. Eighty Caucasian women, aged 50-57 yr (mean 53 +/- 2) who were healthy and within 0. 5-5 yr of the onset of menopause participated in this study. Using the QUS-1(trade mark) Ultrasonometer (Metra Biosystems, Mountain View, CA), we assessed broadband ultrasound attenuation ([BUA] and UBI-4, dB/MHz), the average transit time through the heel ([TTH], mus) and a multiple-factor index (UBI-4T = UBI-4/TTH, dB/[MHz. mus]). The QUS measurement results were calculated from three different sizes of ROI as well as one in a fixed location and one adjusted for foot size. Bone thickness, bone width, bone mineral content ([BMC], g/cm), bone mineral density area ([BMD(a)], g/cm(2)), and bone mineral density volume ([BMD(v)], g/cm(3)) were measured by single-energy photon absorptiometry. Lateral radiography of the foot was used to ensure the QUS scanning location in a subgroup. The results showed that there was a 1.4-5.9% difference in QUS parameters among different ROIs (p = 0.076-0.001). No significant differences between fixed and adjusted location were found regarding the mean values of QUS. The correlation between the fixed and adjusted locations was very strong, although there was a 12-42% unexplained variation. On the other hand, QUS in the size-adjusted ROI increased the correlation with BMC/BMD compared to the fixed QUS assessments. After controlling for body weight and height, a significant correlation between QUS and bone mass variables remained, and in some cases correlations became stronger. Lateral radiography showed that when using a fixed location to scan a large foot, the scanning area might be close to the bone edge, an area of higher BMD and potential acoustic artifacts. When scanning a small foot, the scanning area was confined to the middle of the calcaneus. Our results indicate that bone size has a modest effect on BUA. There is a better correlation with BMD when the measurement region is appropriately located in the calcaneus. This suggests that measurement location based on foot size may improve the accuracy of the measurements, resulting in good diagnostic sensitivity.

Determination of a standard site for the measurement of bone mineral density of the human calcaneus

Ultrasound of the calcaneus may be used as a cheap, ionising radiation-free and easy to use indicator of skeletal status, and hence of osteoporotic fracture risk. At present ultrasound is not widely used as it suffers from high precision errors. As ultrasound parameters are determined in part by bone mineral density (BMD), an increase in the accuracy and precision of BMD measurements should reduce the precision error associated with ultrasound measurements. The aim of this study was to define an anatomical site on the calcaneus at which accurate and precise measurements of BMD can be made. Ten dry calcanei and 10 cadaveric feet were scanned using a DXA scanner; 9 anatomically defined regions (1 cm2) were selected in the posterior part of the calcaneus for analysis. The centre of region 1 was positioned halfway along the line joining the anterior border of the calcaneal tubercle and the peak of the posterior superior tubercle, and the remaining 8 regions were placed around this central area. The BMD in these 9 regions was compared with the whole bone BMD and the variability of BMD within each of the 9 regions was measured. The reproducibility of the technique was assessed by taking 10 repeated measurements of 2 bone and 2 cadaveric specimens, each specimen being removed and repositioned between measurements. Region 1 was found to be the most representative of total BMD in cadaveric feet. This region also showed the least variability of BMD and consistently gave the lowest coefficients of variation in the reproducibility study both in the bone and the cadaveric specimens. This region is hence the most suitable site on the calcaneus for measuring absolute values of and changes in BMD. The surface position of region 1 was found to be consistently 5/9 along the line at 45 degrees to the vertical, from the lateral malleolus to the heel. The identification of the surface location of region 1 relative to anatomical landmarks of the foot has enabled the same anatomical site to be measured in all subjects. This allows meaningful intersubject comparisons to be made. Preliminary data suggest that precision errors using ultrasound are also reduced when measurements are taken at this region of the calcaneus. The reduction in the precision error of ultrasound assessment of skeletal status may provide a cheap and safe way to identify individuals at risk from osteoporotic fracture.

The role of quantitative ultrasound in the assessment of bone: a review

Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) bone measurement is a promising, relatively new technique for the diagnosis of osteoporosis. Unlike to the more established method of bone densitometry [measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) e.g. using dual X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA)], QUS does not use ionizing radiation. It is cheaper, takes up less space and is easier to use than densitometry techniques. The two QUS parameters currently measured are broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) and speed of sound (SOS). The reported age-related changes for healthy women range from -0.27% to -1.62% per year for BUA and from -0.06% to -0.19% per year for SOS. Precision ranges from 1.0 to 3.8% (CV) for BUA and from 0.19 to 0.30% (CV) for SOS. The new method of imaging ultrasound has improved the precision of QUS measurements. QUS is significantly correlated with BMD. Studies with the latest equipment have shown r-values between 0.6 and 0.9 in site-specific measurements, and QUS is thus believed to reflect mainly BMD. However, other studies indicate that QUS measures something other than the actual mineral content of bone, namely bone quality, e.g. in vitro studies have shown that QUS reflects trabecular orientation independently of BMD. In both cross-sectional and prospective studies, QUS seems to be as good a predictor of osteoporotic fractures as BMD. In two large prospective studies, QUS also predicted fracture risk independently of BMD. QUS has just begun to be used systematically for monitoring the response to anti-osteoporotic treatments in prospective trials. In the studies performed, QUS has been found to be useful in the follow-up of patients. QUS is thus a promising new technique for bone assessment.

Utility of ultrasound to assess risk of fracture

Traditional assessments of bone properties have utilized densitometry techniques such as Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA). Recently, quantitative ultrasound (QUS) has been introduced as an alternative method of assessing bone properties. Advantages of QUS over X-ray techniques include low costs, portability, and nonionizing radiation. Proponents of QUS have claimed that this technology can provide information not only about the density but also about the structure and mechanical properties of bone. There are two major questions that need to be answered for those who seek to diagnose bone disorders with ultrasound: (1) what does quantitative ultrasound actually measure, and, even more importantly, (2) what is its clinical utility? In this review we will briefly examine the first question and will focus on the utility of ultrasound in clinical trials to discriminate between fractures and non-fractures and to predict the risk of fractures.

Assessment of bone quantity and 'quality' by ultrasound attenuation and velocity in the heel

OBJECTIVE: To determine if ultrasound measurements in the heel are related to bone quality in addition to quantity. DESIGN: In situ and in vitro experiments on cadaver heels. BACKGROUND: It has been suggested, but not demonstrated, that clinical ultrasound - used to screen for osteoporosis in clinical trials - provides a measure of 'bone quality' as distinct from bone quantity. METHODS: Ultrasound transmission velocity (UTV) and the slope of the linear dependence of broadband ultrasound attenuation on frequency (BUA) were measured in situ in 32 heels of 16 cadavers and in vitro in cores of calcaneal trabecular bone. RESULTS: After adjusting for Young's modulus, in situ UTV explains 33% (P = 0.03) and in situ BUA explains none of the remaining variance in density (r(2) = 0.02, P = 0.60). After adjusting for density, in situ BUA explains 29% (P = 0.04) and in situ UTV explains none of the remaining variance in Young's modulus (r(2) = 0.01, P = 0.79). By comparison, in vitro BUA explains 58% (P = 0.001) of the remaining variance in Young's modulus, after adjusting for density. CONCLUSIONS: In situ BUA reflects 'bone quality' independently of bone quantity, whereas in situ UTV reflects bone quantity independently of 'bone quality'.

In vitro assessment of the relationship between acoustic properties and bone mass density of the calcaneus by comparison of ultrasound parametric imaging and quantitative computed tomography

This in vitro study aimed to add new experimental evidence to clarify the relation between acoustic properties of bone and bone mineral density (BMD) of the human calcaneus. Parametric images of normalized broadband ultrasonic attenuation (nBUA) and ultrasound bone velocity (UBV) were compared with quantitative computed tomography (QCT) images of the calcaneus. The experimental protocol was designed to control the different potential sources of error in acoustic measurements, including the shape and thickness of the samples, intervening soft tissues and cortical bone, boundary effects, and variation in location of the regions of interest (ROIs) analyzed by ultrasound and X-ray. The present study was based on bone specimens from calcaneus removed from 15 cadavers (six male and nine female donors ranging from 69 to 89 years of age). Immersion ultrasonic measurements were performed in the through-thickness direction at normal incidence using a pair of focused broad-band 0.5-MHz transducers. QCT of the specimens was performed using standard 10-mm-thick slices with the Cann-Genant calibration standard. Identical, site-matched ROIs were selected for quantitative analysis on the three images. The pattern of acoustic parameters was similar to that of BMD with QCT. The relationships between nBUA and BMD (r2 = 0.75), between UBV and BMD (r2 = 0.88) and between nBUA and UBV (r2 = 0.84) were highly significant (p < 10(-4). From this study, it appears that ultrasound parameters as measured with current transmission techniques reflect mainly bone quantity and only reflect microarchitecture to a small extent and that BUA and UBV reflect the same bone property.