Inferior performance of Boneloc bone cement in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study comparing Boneloc with Palacos using radiostereometry (RSA) in 19 patients

Randomized controlled trial comparing traditional versus enhanced-fixation designs of a novel cemented total knee arthroplasty tibial component

Aims

A novel enhanced cement fixation (EF) tibial implant with deeper cement pockets and a more roughened bonding surface was released to market for an existing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) system.This randomized controlled trial assessed fixation of the both the EF (ATTUNE S+) and standard (Std; ATTUNE S) using radiostereometric analysis.

Methods

Overall, 50 subjects were randomized (21 EF-TKA and 23 Std-TKA in the final analysis), and had follow-up visits at six weeks, and six, 12, and 24 months to assess migration of the tibial component. Low viscosity bone cement with tobramycin was used in a standardized fashion for all subjects. Patient-reported outcome measure data was captured at preoperative and all postoperative visits.

Results

The patient cohort mean age was 66 years (SD seven years), 59% were female, and the mean BMI was 32 kg/m2 (SD 6 kg/m2). Mean two-year subsidence of the EF-TKA was 0.056 mm (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.025 to 0.086) versus 0.006 mm (95% CI -0.029 to 0.040) for the Std-TKA, and the two-year maximum total point motion (MTPM) was 0.285 mm (95% upper confidence limit (UCL) ≤ 0.363) versus 0.346 mm (95% UCL ≤ 0.432), respectively, for a mean difference of -0.061 mm (95% CI -0.196 to 0.074). Inducible displacement also did not differ between groups. The MTPMs between 12 and 24 months for each group was below the published threshold of 0.2 mm for predicting early aseptic loosening (p < 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively).

Conclusion

Both the enhanced fixation and the standard tibial implant design showed fixation with a predicted low risk of long-term aseptic loosening.

Dose reduction does not impact the precision of CT-based RSA in tibial implants: a diagnostic accuracy study on precision in a porcine cadaver

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Radiostereometric analysis (RSA) is the gold standard for evaluation of migration of implants. CT-RSA has been shown to have precision at the level of RSA in hip, shoulder, and knee joint replacements. We aimed to assess the impact of dose reduction on precision of CT-RSA on tibial implants, comparing it with previously published data on precision of standard dose CT-RSA on tibial implants.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We performed a total knee arthroplasty on a porcine knee cadaver, and subsequent CT-RSA with low effective doses (0.02 mSv). We compared the results with previously published CT-RSA data with standard (0.08 mSv) dose. The primary outcome variable was the difference in precision of the maximum total translation (MTT). Secondary variables included ratios of variances and standard deviations, and precision of peripheral point translations, center-of-mass translations, and rotations. A difference of more than 0.1 mm in precision was defined as clinically relevant. Our hypothesis was that precisions of low and standard CT-RSA doses were equal.

RESULTS

Low dose (mean 0.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.06-0.08) and standard dose CT-RSA (0.08, CI 0.07-0.09) achieve similar precision, with difference in precision of MTT of 0.01, CI 0.00-0.02 mm. The F-statistic (0.99, CI 0.63-1.55) and sdtest (1.05, CI 0.43-2.58) also supported this.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that the precision of low dose CT-RSA for tibial implants on a porcine cadaver is equal to standard dose CT-RSA. However, these findings should be confirmed in clinical trials.

Is TKA femoral implant stability improved by pressure applied cement? a comparison of 2 cementing techniques

BACKGROUND

The majority of knee endoprostheses are cemented. In an earlier study the effects of different cementing techniques on cement penetration were evaluated using a Sawbone model. In this study we used a human cadaver model to study the effect of different cementing techniques on relative motion between the implant and the femoral shaft component under dynamic loading.

METHODS

Two different cementing techniques were tested in a group of 15 pairs of human fresh frozen legs. In one group a conventional cementation technique was used and, in another group, cementation was done using a pressurizing technique. Under dynamic loading that simulated real life conditions relative motion at the bone-implant interface were studied at 20 degrees and 50 degrees flexion.

RESULTS

In both scenarios, the relative motion anterior was significantly increased by pressure application. Distally, it was the same with higher loads. No significant difference could be measured posteriorly at 20°. At 50° flexion, however, pressurization reduced the posterior relative motion significantly at each load level.

CONCLUSION

The use of the pressurizer does not improve the overall fixation compared to an adequate manual cement application. The change depends on the loading, flexion angle and varies in its proportion in between the interface zones.

Two-year fixation and ten-year clinical outcomes of total knee arthroplasty inserted with normal-curing bone cement and slow-curing bone cement: A randomized controlled trial in 54 patients

BACKGROUND

The normal-curing Refobacin® Bone Cement R (RR) and slow-curing Refobacin® Plus Bone Cement (RP) were introduced after discontinuation of the historically most used bone cement, Refobacin®-Palacos® R, in 2005. The aim of this study was to compare total knee arthroplasty component fixation with the two bone cements.

METHODS

54 patients with primary knee osteoarthritis were randomized to either RR (N = 27) or RP (N = 27) bone cement and followed for two years with radiostereometric analysis of tibial and femoral component migration and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry measured periprosthetic bone mineral density (BMD). Further, patients were followed up at ten years with clinical outcome scores (OKS and KOOS).

RESULTS

At two-years follow-up, tibial total translation was 0.31 mm (95% CI: 0.19 - 0.42) for the RP group and 0.56 mm (95% CI: 0.45 - 0.67) (p < 0.01) for the RR group. There was continuous tibial component migration from one to two years follow-up (MTPM > 0.2 mm) in 13/27 patients from the RR and in 12/26 patients from the RP group. There was no difference between groups in BMD baseline values or changes during follow-up, as well as no correlation between change in BMD and tibial component migration. At ten-years follow-up, the improvement in the clinical outcome scores was similar between groups. There were no prosthesis related complications during the 10-year follow-up.

CONCLUSION

At two years, tibial total translation was lower in the RP compared with the RR cement group, but BMD changes were similar. At ten years, no components were revised and clinical outcome scores were similar between groups.

Tibial Component Migration After Total Knee Arthroplasty With High-Viscosity Bone Cement

BACKGROUND

High-viscosity (HV) bone cements have been formulated to offer potentially advantageous handling characteristics. However, alteration in the handling characteristics could influence implant fixation and survival. The primary objective of this study was to use radiostereometric analysis after total knee arthroplasty to assess the migration of the Triathlon tibial component fixed with HV cement (Simplex HV).

METHODS

Twenty-three patients were followed for two years with radiostereometric analysis examinations at 6 visits. Migration was compared with published thresholds and with a control group from a previously published study from the same center using the same implants fixed with a medium viscosity cement. Inducible displacement was assessed, and Oxford 12 Knee Scores and satisfaction were recorded.

RESULTS

Mean maximum total point motion migration reaching 0.40 mm (SD 0.16) at one year, and 0.41mm (SD 0.17) at two years, demonstrating a pattern of stable fixation, below published thresholds of acceptable migration, and not significantly different from the control group. One implant had continuous migration between 1 and 2 years but was clinically asymptomatic. Mean maximum total point motion inducible displacement measured at least one year postoperatively was 0.3 mm (SD 0.12). Mean Oxford 12 Knee Scores improved from 19 (SD 7) preoperatively to 42 (SD 8) 2 years postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of HV cement demonstrated an acceptable pattern of migration at 2 years, indicating low risk for aseptic loosening.

[Early assessment of the risk of later implantloosening using Roentgen Sterophotogrammetric Analysis (RSA)]

BACKGROUND

Aseptic implant loosening is the most common cause of implant revisions in total hip and total knee arthroplasty. Roentgen Stereophotogrammetric Analysis (RSA) represents the current gold standard for the in-vivo assessment of implant fixation.

PRESENT SITUATION

Long-term clinical trials have shown that continuous implant migration within the first two postoperative years correlates strongly with a later aseptic loosening. Thus, the implant migration measured with RSA can be regarded as a reliable surrogate marker for later implant loosening. Over the past 40 years, RSA has been continuously further developed, and the model-based RSA approach has reduced the effort involved since markers attached to implant are no longer needed.

PERSPECTIVES

The RSA method is gaining importance in the certification process of new orthopaedic implants-for example, the Dutch Orthopedic Society has recommended phased-introduction and RSA studies for new hip implants. Furthermore, in the context of the new EU Medical Device Regulation (MDR), which took effect in May 2017, RSA gained relevance for investigating clinically unproven implants. Critics who associate MDR with hindering innovation can be countered in that the RSA method provides a predictive assessment of implant fixation after only two years of follow-up, which is significantly shorter than standard long-term clinical trials.

Overview of Randomized Controlled Trials in Total Knee Arthroplasty (47,675 Patients): What Have We Learnt?

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to provide an overview of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in primary total knee arthroplasty summarizing the available high-quality evidence.

METHODS

Following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, we searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, 2019, Issue 3), Ovid MEDLINE, and Embase. We excluded nonrandomized trials, trials on unicompartmental knee arthroplasty or revision surgery, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. Trials that met our inclusion criteria were assessed using a binary outcome measure of whether they reported statistically significant findings. These were then classified according to the intervention groups (surgical approach, tourniquet use, design, etc.).

RESULTS

Four hundred and three RCTs met the inclusion criteria and were included. The total number of patients in those 403 RCTs was 47,675. Only 33 RCTs (8.2%) reported significant differences between the intervention and the control groups. The trials were grouped into surgical approach 34, tourniquet 31, minimally invasive surgery 13, patient specific instrumentation 30, knee design 37, fixation 27, mobile bearing 47, navigation 50, polyethylene 19, technique 27, patella resurfacing 26, drain 19, closure 16, and others 27 RCTs.

CONCLUSION

For the vast majority of patients, a standard conventional total knee arthroplasty with a surgical approach familiar to the surgeon using standard well-established components, with or without tourniquet, without surgical drain leads to satisfactory long-term clinical outcomes.

RSA migration of total knee replacements

Purpose - We performed a systematic review and meta-analyses to evaluate the early and long-term migration patterns of tibial components of TKR of all known RSA studies. Methods - Migration pattern was defined as at least 2 postoperative RSA follow-up moments. Maximal total point motion (MTPM) at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 5 years, and 10 years were considered. Results - The literature search yielded 1,167 hits of which 53 studies were included, comprising 111 study groups and 2,470 knees. The majority of the early migration occurred in the first 6 months postoperatively followed by a period of stability, i.e., no or very little migration. Cemented and uncemented tibial components had different migration patterns. For cemented tibial components there was no difference in migration between all-poly and metal-backed components, between mobile bearing and fixed bearing, between cruciate retaining and posterior stabilized. Furthermore, no difference existed between TKR measured with model-based RSA or marker-based RSA methods. For uncemented TKR there was some variation in migration with the highest migration for uncoated TKR. Interpretation - The results from this meta-analysis on RSA migration of TKR are in line with both the survival analyses results from joint registries of these TKRs as well as revision rates results from meta-analyses, thus providing further proof for the association between early migration and late revision for loosening. The pooled migration patterns can be used both as benchmarks and for defining migration thresholds for future evaluation of new TKR.

Comparison of a novel porous titanium construct (Regenerex®) to a well proven porous coated tibial surface in cementless total knee arthroplasty - A prospective randomized RSA study with two-year follow-up

BACKGROUND

Regenerex is a novel porous titanium construct with a three-dimensional porous structure and biomechanical characteristics close to that of normal trabecular bone. The aim of this study was to compare this novel construct to a well-proven porous plasma sprayed tibial (PPS) implant after total knee arthroplasty.

METHODS

Sixty-one patients scheduled for an uncemented TKA were randomized to receive either a novel highly porous titanium construct Regenerex or the PPS tibial component. Radiostereometric analysis of the tibial components was performed postoperatively and at three, six, 12, and 24months with measurements of migration (segment motion and maximum total point motion (MTPM)).

RESULTS

Knee and function scores improved significantly from preoperatively to two-year follow-up. For both the Regenerex and the PPS the majority of migration appeared during the first three months and then stabilized. No statistically significant differences in MTPM were found in any follow-up between three and 24months. The Regenerex group had a lower migration rate between 12 and 24months compared with the PPS implants (p=0.03) but the PPS group had an initial significantly lower subsidence (p=0.04).

CONCLUSION

In conclusion the Regenerex implant could prove an effective scaffold material for coating of uncemented implants but did no better than the PPS component at 24months of follow-up. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01936415.

Comparison of femoral component migration between Refobacin bone cement R and Palacos R + G in cemented total hip arthroplasty: A randomised controlled roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis and clinical study

AIMS

The widely used and well-proven Palacos R (a.k.a. Refobacin Palacos R) bone cement is no longer commercially available and was superseded by Refobacin bone cement R and Palacos R + G in 2005. However, the performance of these newly introduced bone cements have not been tested in a phased evidence-based manner, including roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this blinded, randomised, clinical RSA study, the migration of the Stanmore femoral component was compared between Refobacin bone cement R and Palacos R + G in 62 consecutive total hip arthroplasties. The primary outcome measure was femoral component migration measured using RSA and secondary outcomes were Harris hip score (HHS), Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), EuroQol 5D (EQ-5D) and Short Form 36 (SF-36).

RESULTS

Femoral component migration was comparable between Refobacin bone cement R and Palacos R + G during the two-year follow-up period with an estimated mean difference of 0.06 mm of subsidence (p = 0.56) and 0.08° of retroversion (p = 0.82). Five hips (three Refobacin bone cement R and two Palacos R + G) showed non-stabilising, continuous migration; the femoral cement mantle in these hips, was mean 0.7 mm thicker (p = 0.02) and there were more radiolucencies at the bone-cement interface (p = 0.004) in comparison to hips showing stabilising migration. Post-operative HHS was comparable throughout the follow-up period (p = 0.62). HOOS, EQ5D, and SF-36 scores were also comparable (p-values > 0.05) at the two-year follow-up point.

CONCLUSION

Refobacin bone cement R and Palacos R + G show comparable component migration and clinical outcome during the first two post-operative years. Hips showing continuous migration are at risk for early failure. However, this seems to be unrelated to cement type, but rather to cementing technique. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:1333-41.

Comparison of Refobacin bone cement and palacos with gentamicin in total hip arthroplasty: an RSA study with two years follow-up

Previous experience has demonstrated the importance of testing new bone cement in vivo before widespread clinical use. We performed a consecutive, radiostereometric (RSA) study comparing Refobacin Bone Cement (RBC) to the well proven Palacos with Gentamicin (PWG). According to the manufacturer of RBC it has the equivalent characteristics as PWG, and in vitro tests show good results. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether RBC is safe to use in clinical practice for total hip arthroplasty (THA). Two consecutive series of patients with primary osteoarthritis received a THA using a highly polished, collarless, tapered stem with a hollow centralizer. The study comprises 21 hips with RBC and 30 with PWG. The patients were followed up for two years with repeated RSA examinations and clinical outcome questionnaires SF-12 and WOMAC. There were no statistically significant migratory differences between the groups. The mean subsidence after two years was 1.28 mm and 1.40 mm, and the mean retroversion was 1.03° and 0.99°, for the RBC and the PWG groups respectively. Almost all migration occurred in the interface between the stem and the cement. The WOMAC and SF12 clinical scores did not reveal any clinical differences between the groups. We conclude that, as previous in vitro tests indicate, RBC performs as well as PWG and seems to be safe to use in clinical practice for THA.

Early migration of tibial components is associated with late revision: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 21,000 knee arthroplasties

PURPOSE

We performed two parallel systematic reviews and meta-analyses to determine the association between early migration of tibial components and late aseptic revision.

METHODS

One review comprised early migration data from radiostereometric analysis (RSA) studies, while the other focused on revision rates for aseptic loosening from long-term survival studies. Thresholds for acceptable and unacceptable migration were determined according to that of several national joint registries: < 5% revision at 10 years.

RESULTS

Following an elaborate literature search, 50 studies (involving 847 total knee prostheses (TKPs)) were included in the RSA review and 56 studies (20,599 TKPs) were included in the survival review. The results showed that for every mm increase in migration there was an 8% increase in revision rate, which remained after correction for age, sex, diagnosis, hospital type, continent, and study quality. Consequently, migration up to 0.5 mm was considered acceptable during the first postoperative year, while migration of 1.6 mm or more was unacceptable. TKPs with migration of between 0.5 and 1.6 mm were considered to be at risk of having revision rates higher than 5% at 10 years.

INTERPRETATION

There was a clinically relevant association between early migration of TKPs and late revision for loosening. The proposed migration thresholds can be implemented in a phased, evidence-based introduction of new types of knee prostheses, since they allow early detection of high-risk TKPs while exposing only a small number of patients.

Does a new knee design perform as well as the design it replaces?

Objectives

The objective of this study was to compare the early migration characteristics and functional outcome of the Triathlon cemented knee prosthesis with its predecessor, the Duracon cemented knee prosthesis (both Stryker).

Methods

A total 60 patients were prospectively randomised and tibial component migration was measured by radiostereometric analysis (RSA) at three months, one year and two years; clinical outcome was measured by the American Knee Society score and the Knee Osteoarthritis and Injury Outcome Score.

Results

There were no statistically significant differences in rotation or translation around or along the three coordinal axes, or in the maximum total point motion (MTPM) during the two-year follow-up.

Conclusions

The Triathlon cemented knee prosthesis has similar early stability and is likely to perform at least as well as the Duracon cemented knee prosthesis over the longer term.

Longitudinal migration and inducible displacement of the Mobility Total Ankle System

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

RSA can be used for early detection of unstable implants. We assessed the micromotion of the Mobility Total Ankle System over 2 years, to evaluate the stability of the bone-implant interface using radiostereometric analysis measurements of longitudinal migration and inducible displacement.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

23 patients were implanted with the Mobility system. Median age was 62 (28-75) years and median BMI was 28.8 (26.0-34.5). Supine radiostereometric analysis examinations were done from postoperatively to the 2-year follow-up. Standing examinations were taken from the 3-month to the 2-year follow-up. Migrations and displacements were assessed using model-based RSA software (v. 3.2).

RESULTS

The median maximum total point motion (MTPM) for the implants at 2 years was 1.19 (0.39-1.95) mm for the talar component and 0.90 (0.17-2.28) mm for the spherical tip of the tibial component. The general pattern for all patients was that the slope of the migration curves decreased over time. The main direction of motion for both components was that of subsidence. The median 2-year MTPM inducible displacement for the talar component was 0.49 (0.27-1.15) mm, and it was 0.07 (0.03-0.68) mm for the tibial component tip.

INTERPRETATION

The implants subside into the bone over time and under load. This corresponds to the direction of primary loading during standing or walking. This statistically significant motion may become a clinically significant finding that would correspond with premature implant failure.

Tibial component fixation with a peri-apatite coating: evaluation by radiostereometric analysis in a canine total knee arthroplasty model

Cementless fixation for the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains problematic. Peri-Apatite (PA), a solution-deposited hydroxyapatite, is under investigation as an option for improving the fixation of cementless tibial components. In this study, radiostereometric analysis was used to document implant migration in 48 dogs that underwent TKA with cementless, PA-coated, or cemented tibial components. Migration at 12 weeks was similar in the 2 groups. At 12 months, there was greater migration in the PA-coated group, but the difference between the 2 groups was below the threshold considered clinically significant. In this canine TKA model, cementless fixation with PA performed less well than did cemented fixation, but not to a degree that would make a clinical difference in the short term.

Cemented versus uncemented fixation of the femoral component of the NexGen CR total knee replacement in patients younger than 60 years: a prospective randomised controlled RSA study

The optimal mode of femoral fixation in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial, especially for the young patient. In a prospective randomised study we compared the magnitude and pattern of the fixation of cemented versus uncemented femoral components during 2 years in patients younger than 60 years. Forty-one knees in 41 patients were randomised to receive a NexGen (Zimmer, Warsaw, USA) cruciate-retaining TKA with either a cemented or an uncemented non HA-coated femoral component. The patients were examined by radiostereometric analysis (RSA), as well as clinical and radiological evaluation. The magnitude and pattern of migration as measured by RSA did not differ significantly between the cemented and uncemented fixation during the 2-year follow-up, nor were there any differences between the groups in clinical parameters. These findings suggest that an uncemented and non HA-coated femoral component may behave equally as well as a cemented one in the long-term.

The history and future of radiostereometric analysis

Roentgen stereophotogrammetry allows one to localize the position of an object in space using roentgen rays. For orthopaedic purposes it was developed 35 years ago by Göran Selvik, and since that time many investigators have refined the radiostereometric calculations and evaluative software. Many uses and mathematical algorithms have been developed, and advancements in computer programs and digital radiography continue to expand its capabilities. Despite these advances, improvements in the technical accuracy and type of kinematic analyses possible have been relatively modest. However, radiostereometric analysis is now easier and less time consuming to use, with a resolution in clinical practice almost equal to what could only previously be obtained under ideal laboratory conditions. The ability to measure skeletal and implant movements with high resolution in vivo images was an important progressive step for the orthopaedic community. Radiostereometric analysis has helped develop new fields in clinical orthopaedic research and continues to improve advancements in orthopaedic health care.

Mobile bearings do not improve fixation in cemented total knee arthroplasty

Mobile bearings were introduced to improve wear and knee kinematics. By uncoupling the forces generated at the articulation from the implant-bone interface this would, theoretically, also improve the fixation of the implant to bone. We did this study to evaluate whether mobile bearings improve the fixation of the tibial component to bone. Fifty-two consecutive knees in 47 patients (average age, 72 years; range, 62-84 years) with primary osteoarthrosis were randomized into two groups to receive a cemented total knee arthroplasty with either a fixed-bearing or mobile-bearing tibial component. The quality of fixation was analyzed with radiostereometric analysis for up to 2 years. Mobile bearings did not improve fixation. Both magnitudes and directions of component rotations were similar, and the number of implants with continuous migration was almost identical. Both implant types had a combination of subsidence and lift-off, but where the mobile bearing implants displayed more of subsidence, the fixed bearing knees showed more lift-off. It might be that the somewhat stiffer cobalt-chromium baseplate or the different joint conformity used in the mobile-bearing knees counteracts any potential effects of the mobile bearing.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level I. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Uncemented HA-coated implant is the optimum fixation for TKA in the young patient

Fixation of the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty in younger patients remains controversial. We evaluate the results of three different types of fixation of the Profix total knee arthroplasty in a randomized controlled trial of 97 consecutive knees (85 patients) with osteoarthrosis or inflammatory arthritis with 2-year followup of all patients. We randomized patients to three different types of fixation of the tibial component: cemented, uncemented (HA coated) with screws, or uncemented (HA coated) without screws. We performed clinical evaluations and radiostereometric analysis at 6 weeks, and 3, 6, 12 and 24 months postoperatively. The knees in the uncemented groups migrated more than those in the cemented group during the first 3 months, but at 2 years we observed no differences. The uncemented implants displayed all migration within the first 3 months. The cemented implants did not stabilize but had continuously increasing migration during the followup. Cementless implants without screws did not migrate more than implants with screws and displayed similar pattern of migration, indicating screws do not improve fixation. Uncemented fixation using hydroxyapatite-coated implants without screws seems to be the best solution for the younger patient.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level I. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

VersaBond bone cement prospective randomized study of the clinical properties of a new bone cement in total knee replacement

VersaBond is a newly developed bone cement. To investigate its clinical performance, VersaBond was compared to Palacos R in a prospective randomized study in total knee replacement. Fifty-nine patients (61 knees) undergoing total knee replacement were randomized to either VersaBond or Palacos R bone cement and followed for 24 months using radiostereometric analysis (RSA). Up to 2 years there were no significant differences in clinical performance between the two cements. The mean/median values for implant migration were very similar for the two bone cements, as were the dispersion, and distribution of outliers. Also the proportion "stable" and "continuously migrating" implants was similar between the two cements. The result of this study indicates that VersaBond bone cement will perform at least equally as well as Palacos R in total knee replacement as regards as aseptic loosening.

Influence of cement viscosity and cement mantle thickness on migration of the Exeter total hip prosthesis

The effect of bone cement viscosity and cement mantle thickness on the migration of the Exeter total hip prosthesis was studied in a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical Roentgen Stereophotogrammetric Analysis study. Forty-one cemented total hip arthroplasty in 39 patients were included and randomized into a low/medium Simplex P cement group and a high-viscosity Simplex AF cement group. At time of stem introduction, 5 minutes after mixing, the Simplex AF was more viscous than Simplex P. No statistical difference existed between the 2 cement groups, for neither translation nor rotation migration data. Subsidence of the stem at 2-year follow-up was 1.1 +/- 0.56 mm for Simplex AF cement and 1.5 +/- 1.00 mm for Simplex P cement. The mean rotation of the acetabular components about the sagittal axis was 1.7 degrees +/- 3.8 degrees in the Simplex AF group and 0.7 degrees +/- 2.1 degrees for the Simplex P group. No effect of cement mantle thickness on migration of neither the acetabular cups nor the femoral stems was found. Although there were no differences in migration data for the cups and the stems, 2 acetabular cups in the Simplex AF group (almost 10%) were revised because of mechanical loosening. Because of these findings, we suggest caution before using this new high-viscosity bone cement for fixation of acetabular components.

The impact of total joint replacement in rheumatoid arthritis

Management of the patient with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) requires a multidisciplinary approach, the role of the surgeon being to improve functional ability for the patient by reconstructing a deteriorated joint by total joint arthroplasty (TJA). An advantage of prosthetic evaluation over pharmacological medication evaluations is that the 'compliance' of the patient with the treatment (i.e. the TJA) is 100%, even at long-term follow-up. However, long-term follow-up of prosthesis evaluation is as difficult as the evaluation of any other intervention. Although the goal of any intervention on an RA patient is to improve functional ability, and thus self-support, of the patient, objective evaluation of the surgical procedure, and of its impact on the patient, can be difficult. The potential chronic course of RA makes evaluation of a specific surgical procedure and its effect on the patient difficult to interpret. The success of the TJA is generally judged on a survivorship analysis at 10 or 15 years in national registries (i.e. >40000 implants); revision surgery is used as an end-point for survival of the TJA. With a mean 90% survival at 10-year follow-up, total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty may be considered gold-standard TJA procedures for the patient. While revision is the end-point, the course to this end-point starts with progressive micromotion of the prosthesis. The effect of prosthetic changes, and of medication on prosthesis migration, can be measured very accurately by radiostereometry. The latter measures the actual performance of the TJA in the bone. Next to these more procedure-oriented evaluations, patient-oriented evaluations (e.g. quality of life, patient expectations) are of importance in judging the impact of the TJA on the RA patient. These evaluations provide evidence that the pre-operative status of the joint/extremity determines the extent of post-operative functional gain. Thus, postponing TJA for too long will give less functional benefit.

Fatigue testing and performance of acrylic bone-cement materials: state-of-the-art review

Over the past three decades or so, a very large volume of literature has been generated on the impact of an assortment of variables on the fatigue lifetimes of a large number of acrylic bone-cement formulations. In the present article, this literature is examined critically to reveal areas of agreement, areas of disagreement, as well as a welter of underexplored and unexplored topics. For example, there is unanimity of support for the notion that an increase in the molecular weight of the powder constituents or the fully cured cement leads to an increase in the cement's fatigue life, whereas there is disagreement as to whether vacuum mixing the cement constituents leads to an increase in the fatigue life of the fully cured cement (relative to the hand-mixed counterpart). Among the underexplored topics is systematic study of the effect of test frequency on the fatigue results, whereas determination of the optimal concentration of the antibiotic in an antibiotic-loaded cement is an example of the unexplored topics. It is pointed out that resolving the controversies, addressing the underexplored topics, and filling the lacunae will allow comprehensive evaluations of acrylic bone-cement materials to be made. This enhanced body of knowledge will prove invaluable in the continued use of acrylic bone cement as the anchoring agent in cemented arthroplasties.

Fixation of the tibial component using CMW-1 or Palacos bone cement with gentamicin: similar outcome in a randomized radiostereometric study of 51 total knee arthroplasties

We studied CMW-1 bone cement with gentamicin in the laboratory and in a randomized clinical study. Palacos bone cement containing gentamicin was used as the control. In the preclinical evaluation, the CMW cement had slightly less mechanical strength. In the clinical study, 51 patients (51 knees) operated on with total knee arthroplasty were studied for 2 years. We used radiostereometric analysis to measure migration of the tibial components, randomized to fixation with either of the two types of cement. The extent and pattern of migration were similar in both groups, and we found no differences in the number, size and extent of radiolucent lines or clinical outcome. No complications occurred. Our findings suggest a need for more studies of CMW-1 bone cement containing gentamicin in a larger cohort of patients.

Residual stress due to curing can initiate damage in porous bone cement: experimental and theoretical evidence

Residual stress due to shrinkage of polymethylmethacrylate bone cement after polymerisation is possibly one factor capable of initiating cracks in the mantle of cemented hip replacements. No relationship between residual stress and observed cracking of cement has yet been demonstrated. To investigate if any relationship exists, a physical model has been developed which allows direct observation of damage in the cement layer on the femoral side of total hip replacement. The model contains medial and lateral cement layers between a bony surface and a metal stem; the tubular nature of the cement mantle is ignored. Five specimens were prepared and examined for cracking using manual tracing of stained cracks, observed by transmission microscopy; cracks were located and measured using image analysis. A mathematical approach for the prediction of residual stress due to shrinkage was developed which uses the thermal history of the material to predict when stress-locking occurs, and estimates subsequent thermal stress. The residual stress distribution of the cement layer in the physical model was then calculated using finite element analysis. Results show maximum tensile stresses normal to the observed crack directions, suggesting a link between residual stress and pre-load cracking. The residual stress predicted depends strongly on the definition of the reference temperature for stress-locking. The highest residual stresses (4-7 MPa) are predicted for shrinkage from maximum temperature; in this case, magnitudes are sufficiently high to initiate cracks when the influence of stress raisers such as pores or interdigitation at the bone/cement interface are taken into account (up to 24 MPa when calculating stress around a pore according to the method of Harrigan and Harris (J. Biomech. 24(11) (1991) 1047-1058). We conclude that the damage accumulation failure scenario begins before weight-bearing due to cracking induced by residual stress around pores or stress raisers.