Long-term results after vascularised bone graft as treatment of Kienböck disease

Radial shortening osteotomy vs partial capitate shortening osteotomy in Kienböck's disease: Medium-term radiological and clinical results

This study aimed to compare medium-term results for partial capitate shortening (PCS) and radial shortening (RS) osteotomies on lunate bone revascularization and disease progression in patients with stage II or IIIA Kienböck's disease. Patients who underwent surgery for Kienböck's disease between March 2010 and July 2020 were retrospectively evaluated. Clinical evaluation included assessment of pain, joint range of motion, strength, DASH, visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, Modified Mayo Wrist Score (MMWS), satisfaction and time to return to work, with comparison as appropriate to the contralateral side. Preoperative and postoperative plain radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were used for radiological evaluation. Lichtman staging and signal changes in the lunate were evaluated using MRI. Group 1 (PCS) included 14 patients and Group 2 (RS) 14. Mean follow-up was 57.8 months (range 24-102) in Group 1 and 49.4 months (range 36-73) in Group 2. Clinical evaluation included pain on VAS, DASH score, MMWS, range of motion, and grip, palmar and key pinch strength. Regarding lunate bone vascularization, increased signal on final follow-up MRI was observed in 10 of the 14 patients in Group 1 and 7 of the 14 patients in Group 2. There was a positive correlation between revascularization and final follow-up MMWS (p = 0.006). The present study thus showed that functional scores were improved by revascularization in Kienböck's disease. Both osteotomies had clinically and radiologically satisfactory results. However, we believe that PCS osteotomy is preferable, as it leads to higher revascularization rates without increasing ulnolunate load.

Kienböck's disease: Role of cross-sectional imaging in treatment choice and patient follow-up

The management of Kienböck's disease is complex and constantly evolving in parallel with progress in the understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms of this condition. Cross-sectional imaging techniques have an essential role in the diagnosis and prognostic assessment of this disease. CT allows the optimal study of the morpho-structure of lunate bone. MRI makes it possible to study bone marrow viability. As for CT arthrography, it allows to evaluate accurately articular cartilage of the different carpal joints. The evaluation of these different aspects of Kienböck's disease is essential for optimal treatment selection. Cross-sectional imaging also has an interest in post-treatment follow-up, by having a prognostic value and allowing the identification of post-operative complications. The purpose of this article is to review the contribution of cross-sectional imaging in the assessment of Kienböck's disease before and after treatment according to the most common surgical procedures. Pathophysiological mechanisms, predisposing factors, the different classifications and their interests will be discussed.

Long-Term Outcomes of Radial Osteotomy for the Treatment of Kienböck Disease

Background Kienböck disease is an aseptic necrosis of the lunate of unknown etiology, prevalent in young adults. Treatment aims to lower forces on the lunate, decrease pain and improve function. We conducted a retrospective evaluation of the 10-year clinical and radiological outcomes of radial osteotomy as a treatment for Kienböck disease. Materials and Methods We analyzed pain, grip strength, wrist range of motion (ROM), radiological carpal geometry, and staging of osteoarthritic changes over a 10-year period, postosteotomy, for 18 patients. The Mayo wrist score was used as an overall measure of outcome. Technique Outcomes for two types of osteotomies were included, a step-cut osteotomy with fixed screws and an updated technique of two linear transverse osteotomies with volar locking plates. For cases with negative ulnar variance, resection of the radius was included to obtain a final ulnar variance of -1 to 0 mm. For positive ulnar variance, the goal was to obtain a correction of radial inclination of 10 to 15 degrees. Results Improvements in pain, ROM, and grip strength were maintained over the 10-year follow-up, without radiological improvement in geometry (carpal height ratio and Stahl index). Mild osteoarthritic changes were identified in 33% of patients, with no effect on clinical results. Degree of cartilage damage determined postoperative grip strength improvement. The Mayo wrist score at the final follow-up was excellent in one patient, good in nine, and fair in eight. Conclusions Radial osteotomy provides reasonable and long-term clinical benefits. Preoperative arthroscopic evaluation of cartilage damage can inform treatment decisions.