1
|
Martins FE, Lumen N, Holm HV. Management of the Devastated Bladder Outlet after Prostate CANCER Treatment. Curr Urol Rep 2024; 25:149-162. [PMID: 38750347 DOI: 10.1007/s11934-024-01206-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/23/2024] [Indexed: 06/26/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Devastating complications of the bladder outlet resulting from prostate cancer treatments are relatively uncommon. However, the combination of the high incidence of prostate cancer and patient longevity after treatment have raised awareness of adverse outcomes deteriorating patients' quality of life. This narrative review discusses the diagnostic work-up and management options for bladder outlet obstruction resulting from prostate cancer treatments, including those that require urinary diversion. RECENT FINDINGS The devastated bladder outlet can be a consequence of the treatment of benign conditions, but more frequently from complications of pelvic cancer treatments. Regardless of etiology, the initial treatment ladder involves endoluminal options such as dilation and direct vision internal urethrotomy, with or without intralesional injection of anti-fibrotic agents. If these conservative strategies fail, surgical reconstruction should be considered. Although surgical reconstruction provides the best prospect of durable success, reconstructive procedures are also associated with serious complications. In the worst circumstances, such as prior radiotherapy, failed reconstruction, devastated bladder outlet with end-stage bladders, or patient's severe comorbidities, reconstruction may neither be realistic nor justified. Urinary diversion with or without cystectomy may be the best option for these patients. Thorough patient counseling before treatment selection is of utmost importance. Outcomes and repercussions on quality of life vary extensively with management options. Meticulous preoperative diagnostic evaluation is paramount in selecting the right treatment strategy for each individual patient. The risk of bladder outlet obstruction, and its severest form, devastated bladder outlet, after treatment of prostate cancer is not negligible, especially following radiation. Management includes endoluminal treatment, open or robot-assisted laparoscopic reconstruction, and urinary diversion in the worst circumstances, with varying success rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francisco E Martins
- Department of Urology, University of Lisbon, School of Medicine, Centro Hospitalar Universitário, Lisboa Norte (CHULN), Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Nicolaas Lumen
- Department of Urology, Ghent University Hospital, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Muñoz Muñoz Ó, Gomis Sellés E, Delgado León BD, Mateos Perez JC, Baeza Trujillo M, Perucha Ortega M, López Guerra JL, Cabrera Roldán P. Reirradiation salvage radiotherapy for recurrent prostate cancer after primary low-dose brachytherapy. Clin Transl Oncol 2024; 26:872-879. [PMID: 37672205 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-023-03315-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Local recurrence of prostate cancer after low-dose rate brachytherapy is a clinical problem with limited salvage treatment options. This prospective study evaluated the tolerability and outcome of salvage external beam radiation therapy (S-EBRT) for locally recurrent prostate cancer after primary low-dose rate prostate brachytherapy (LDR-BT). MATERIALS AND METHODS Between October 2012 and 2022, 18 patients with biopsy-proven locally recurrent prostate cancer after primary LDR-BT and received S-EBRT. We evaluated biochemical failure (BF), overall survival (OS) and acute/late gastrointestinal and urinary toxicities (CTCAE v5.0 or CTCAE v4, only before 2017). RESULTS Median follow-up was 32 months (range, 5-124). The median age was at S-EBRT 68 years (range 59-79). 34% (6/18) were low risk, 44% (8/18) intermediate risk, 5% (1/18) high risk, and 17% (3/18) not specified. All patients were treated with IMRT/VMAT and received 60 Gy (2.5 Gy/fraction) to the prostate and 40% (7/18) 55.2 Gy (2,3 Gy/fx) to the seminal vesicles. 56% received ADT The 3-year OS and biochemical relapse-free survival after S-EBRT were 100% and 89%, respectively, with a median PSA nadir 0,035 ng/mL (0,01-0,34). Acute cystitis was present in 72% (13/18) of patients (27% of Grade > 2). Urethritis was present in 78% (14/18) patients (16% of cases Grade > 3), and acute rectitis occurred in 22% (4/18) of patients (no cases Grade > 3). CONCLUSIONS Our data suggest that the treatment of locally recurrent prostate cancer with S-EBRT could provide adequate disease control safely and be used as an additional treatment in the natural history of prostate cancer patients. However, the results are still early and the sample is small; larger studies with longer follow-up would be mandatory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Óscar Muñoz Muñoz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Manuel Siurot Avenue, S/N., 41013, Seville, Spain
| | - Elías Gomis Sellés
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Manuel Siurot Avenue, S/N., 41013, Seville, Spain
| | - Blas David Delgado León
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Manuel Siurot Avenue, S/N., 41013, Seville, Spain
| | - Juan Carlos Mateos Perez
- Department of Medical Physiology and Biophysics, Medical Radiation Physics, University of Seville, University Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain
| | | | - Maria Perucha Ortega
- Department of Medical Radiation Physics, University Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain
| | - José Luis López Guerra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Manuel Siurot Avenue, S/N., 41013, Seville, Spain.
| | - Patricia Cabrera Roldán
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Manuel Siurot Avenue, S/N., 41013, Seville, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Martins FE, Holm HV, Lumen N. Devastated Bladder Outlet in Pelvic Cancer Survivors: Issues on Surgical Reconstruction and Quality of Life. J Clin Med 2021; 10:4920. [PMID: 34768438 PMCID: PMC8584541 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10214920] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2021] [Revised: 10/18/2021] [Accepted: 10/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Bladder outlet obstruction following treatment of pelvic cancer, predominantly prostate cancer, occurs in 1-8% of patients. The high incidence of prostate cancer combined with the long-life expectancy after treatment has increased concerns with cancer survivorship care. However, despite increased oncological cure rates, these adverse events do occur, compromising patients' quality of life. Non-traumatic obstruction of the posterior urethra and bladder neck include membranous and prostatic urethral stenosis and bladder neck stenosis (also known as contracture). The devastated bladder outlet can result from benign conditions, such as neurogenic dysfunction, trauma, iatrogenic causes, or more frequently from complications of oncologic treatment, such as prostate, bladder and rectum. Most posterior urethral stenoses may respond to endoluminal treatments such as dilatation, direct vision internal urethrotomy, and occasionally urethral stents. Although surgical reconstruction offers the best chance of durable success, these reconstructive options are fraught with severe complications and, therefore, are far from being ideal. In patients with prior RT, failed reconstruction, densely fibrotic and/or necrotic and calcified posterior urethra, refractory incontinence or severe comorbidities, reconstruction may not be either feasible or recommended. In these cases, urinary diversion with or without cystectomy is usually required. This review aims to discuss the diagnostic evaluation and treatment options for patients with bladder outlet obstruction with a special emphasis on patients unsuitable for reconstruction of the posterior urethra and requiring urinary diversion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francisco E. Martins
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, University of Lisbon, Hospital Santa Maria/CHULN, 1649-035 Lisbon, Portugal
| | | | - Nicolaas Lumen
- Department of Urology, Ghent University Hospital, 9000 Ghent, Belgium;
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Prostate cancer and food-based antioxidants in India as plausible therapeutics. Cancer 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-819547-5.00019-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
5
|
Miszczyk L, Stąpór-Fudzińska M, Miszczyk M, Maciejewski B, Tukiendorf A. Salvage CyberKnife-Based Reirradiation of Patients With Recurrent Prostate Cancer: The Single-Center Experience. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2018; 17:1533033818785496. [PMID: 29983098 PMCID: PMC6048607 DOI: 10.1177/1533033818785496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate CyberKnife-based radioablation as a salvage
treatment for prostate cancer postirradiation relapses based on a group of patients
disqualified from available conventional methods of salvage treatment. Thirty-eight
patients were treated with a fraction dose varying from 5.5 to 10 Gy (median 7.35) to a
total dose of 18 to 36.25 Gy (median 36.25). In all, 55.3% of patients had androgen
deprivation therapy during this time. Nine patients had oligometastases in the salvage
time. The follow-up varied from 1.6 to 46.4 months (mean 19.7, median 14.4). In all, 92.6%
to 97.4% of patients had no gastrointestinal acute adverse effects; no effects higher than
G1 were noted. There were particular (up to 4.8%) G2 late gastrointestinal effects. The
percentage without genitourinary acute effects varied from 59.1% to 78.9%; 3.7% had G3
toxicity. G3 late genitourinary toxicity appeared 3 times, the maximal percentage being
12.5% (24 months after salvage treatment). The nadir of prostate-specific antigen median
was 0.24 ng/mL (9 months after treatment). Twelve (31.6%) patients failed in the timeline
of 6 to 42 months after salvage treatment (mean 18.7, median 16.5)—5 due to dissemination.
In 2 cases, progression in existing metastases was identified. Five (13.2%) patients had
biochemical failure without additional metastases (local relapses); hence, local control
was 86.8%. The failure risk is strongly influenced by initial disease stage and presalvage
prostate-specific antigen concentration. The obtained results permit us to conclude that
such a treatment could be an effective and safe option for prostate cancer postirradiation
relapse salvage treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leszek Miszczyk
- 1 Radiotherapy Department, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, Gliwice, Poland
| | | | | | - Bogusław Maciejewski
- 1 Radiotherapy Department, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, Gliwice, Poland
| | - Andrzej Tukiendorf
- 3 Epidemioloy Department, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, Gliwice, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Browne BM, Vanni AJ. Management of Urethral Stricture and Bladder Neck Contracture Following Primary and Salvage Treatment of Prostate Cancer. Curr Urol Rep 2018; 18:76. [PMID: 28776126 DOI: 10.1007/s11934-017-0729-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This article discusses the incidence, evaluation, and treatment of bladder outlet obstruction from urethral stricture, vesicourethral anastomotic stricture, and bladder neck contracture following primary and salvage treatment of prostate cancer. RECENT FINDINGS Rates of stenosis after prostate cancer treatment appear similar across all primary treatment modalities including radical prostatectomy, radiation therapy, cryoablation, and high-intensity focused ultrasound in contemporary series. Urethral dilation and urethrotomy continue to report moderate patency rates. Urethroplasty achieves high patency rates even for long strictures, but more extensive reconstruction increases the risk of postoperative urinary incontinence. Recent AUA guidelines on urethral strictures provide new recommendations for management of these patients. All treatment options for prostate cancer carry a risk for bladder outlet obstruction, and intervention is often necessary to relieve long-lasting morbidity. Careful preoperative evaluation should be completed to assess location and extent of the stricture in order to choose optimal therapy. Endoscopic treatments, open reconstruction, and urinary diversion all play a role in relief of stenosis depending on stricture length, location, characteristics, and patient comorbidities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brendan Michael Browne
- Department of Urology, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, 41 Mall Road, Burlington, MA, 01805, USA
| | - Alex J Vanni
- Department of Urology, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, 41 Mall Road, Burlington, MA, 01805, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Golbari NM, Katz AE. Salvage Therapy Options for Local Prostate Cancer Recurrence After Primary Radiotherapy: a Literature Review. Curr Urol Rep 2018; 18:63. [PMID: 28688020 DOI: 10.1007/s11934-017-0709-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW While recurrence after primary treatment of prostate cancer (PCa) is not uncommon, there is currently no consensus on the most appropriate management after radiation treatment failure. This article seeks to explore the currently utilized modalities for salvage treatment for radiorecurrent PCa. We focused our review on the oncologic outcomes and reported toxicity rates in the latest studies examining salvage radical prostatectomy (SRP), salvage cryotherapy (SCT), salvage high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) and re-irradiation. RECENT FINDINGS There does not appear to be any significant difference in overall survival for more invasive salvage radical prostatectomy compared to the minimally invasive salvage approaches. Additionally, there seems to be a trend towards lower morbidity rates associated with minimally invasive and focal salvage treatment. We are encouraged by the results presented in this review and find that there is clearly a role for emerging minimally invasive and focal therapies as durable options for salvage treatment in patients with radiorecurrent PCa.
Collapse
|
8
|
Nicholson HL, Al-Hakeem Y, Maldonado JJ, Tse V. Management of bladder neck stenosis and urethral stricture and stenosis following treatment for prostate cancer. Transl Androl Urol 2017; 6:S92-S102. [PMID: 28791228 PMCID: PMC5522805 DOI: 10.21037/tau.2017.04.33] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2016] [Accepted: 03/26/2017] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of this review is to examine all urethral strictures and stenoses subsequent to treatment for prostate cancer, including radical prostatectomy (RP), radiotherapy, high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) and cryotherapy. The overall majority respond to endoscopic treatment, including dilatation, direct visual internal urethrotomy (DVIU) or bladder neck incision (BNI). There are adjunct treatments to endoscopic management, including injections of corticosteroids and mitomycin C (MMC) and urethral stents, which remain controversial and are not currently mainstay of treatment. Recalcitrant strictures are most commonly managed with urethroplasty, while recalcitrant stenosis is relatively rare yet almost always associated with bothersome urinary incontinence, requiring bladder neck reconstruction and subsequent artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation, or urinary diversion for the devastated outlet.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen L. Nicholson
- Department of Urology, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Concord, University of Sydney, Australia
| | - Yasser Al-Hakeem
- Department of Urology, Macquarie University Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Vincent Tse
- Department of Urology, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Concord, University of Sydney, Australia
- Department of Urology, Macquarie University Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
18 F-Choline Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Detection of Early Local Recurrence of Prostate Cancer Initially Treated by Radiation Therapy: Comparison With Systematic 3-Dimensional Transperineal Mapping Biopsy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017; 97:986-994. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.12.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2016] [Revised: 12/12/2016] [Accepted: 12/18/2016] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
10
|
Cryosurgery would be An Effective Option for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review. Sci Rep 2016; 6:27490. [PMID: 27271239 PMCID: PMC4895342 DOI: 10.1038/srep27490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2015] [Accepted: 05/17/2016] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Cryosurgery (CS) has been used on patients with clinically localized PCa for more than 10 years. However, clinical studies evaluating its effectiveness and safety have reported conflicting results. This systematic assessment was performed to obtain comprehensive evidence regarding the potential benefits and safety of CS compared with those of radiotherapy (RT) and radical prostatectomy (RP), respectively. All controlled trials comparing CS with RT or RP and single-arm studies reporting results of CS therapy were identified through comprehensive searches of PubMed, the Cochrane Library and Embase. Ten publications from seven trials, with totally 1252 patients, were included in the meta-analysis, which revealed no significant differences in comparisons of CS vs RT and CS vs RP for overall survival and disease specific survival. However, a significantly lower disease-free survival could be observed for CS than RP. Moreover, a systematic review of literature focusing on comparative data of databases and materials of single-arm trials revealed satisfactory survival results in both primary and salvage CS. Our results showed that cryosurgery would be a relatively effective method for clinically localized prostate cancer with survival results comparable to radiotherapy and radical prostatectomy. However, the large percentage of complications caused by cryosurgery should be carefully monitored.
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
Despite radical treatment, many men with prostate cancer will develop recurrence of their disease. In an exciting era of new therapies for prostate cancer in general, we focus on how these will specifically benefit those men with recurrent disease. We consider salvage treatments aimed at those with local recurrence confined to the prostate gland, therapies for those presenting with metastatic recurrence and the approach to men presenting with a rising prostate-specific antigen but no demonstrable disease (M0). In general, men with recurrent disease are often under-represented in randomized clinical trials. Consequently, evidence to guide treatment for these men is often lacking and this needs to be addressed in order to improve and better define our approach to this problem in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Hanna
- Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, 1053 Great Western Road, Glasgow, G12 0YN, UK
| | - Robert J Jones
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, 1053 Great Western Road, Glasgow, G12 0YN, UK
| |
Collapse
|