Treatment of trigeminal and thoracic zoster with idoxuridine

Actualización en el tratamiento del herpes zóster

The systemic treatment of herpes zoster shortens the healing process, and prevents or alleviates pain and other acute or chronic complications, especially when it is administered in the first 72 hours after symptoms appear. This treatment is especially indicated in patients over the age of 50 and in those who, regardless of age, have head and neck involvement, especially in herpes zoster ophthalmicus. The drugs approved in Europe for the systemic treatment of herpes zoster are aciclovir, valaciclovir, famciclovir and brivudine. Brivudine shows greater effectiveness against the varicella-zoster virus than aciclovir and its derivatives, and can be given just once a day for seven days, compared to multiple doses of the latter. As opposed to the others, brivudine is a non-nephrotoxic drug that should not be administered to immunodepressed patients or to those being treated with 5-fluorouracil. The treatment of herpes zoster to reduce pain should be combined with analgesics and neuroactive agents (amitriptyline, gabapentin, etc). While corticosteroids are of dubious efficacy in the treatment of post-herpes neuralgia, the intensity and duration of the pain can be reduced with some topical treatments (capsaicin, lidocaine patches, etc). Finally, this review discusses treatment guidelines for special locations (cranial nerves) and different subpopulations (children, pregnant women, immunodepressed patients, etc).

The role of antivirals in the management of neuropathic pain in the older patient with herpes zoster

Herpes zoster has been known since ancient times. It is a ubiquitous disease, occurring sporadically without any seasonal preference and is caused by the varicella-zoster virus. It may be defined as an endogenous relapse of the primary infection varicella. Herpes zoster is characterised by typical efflorescences in the innervation region of a cranial or spinal nerve and starts and ends with pain of varying intensity. Currently, several antiviral drugs are approved and many studies have shown that antiviral therapy, started early in the course of disease, can significantly reduce the risk and the duration of postherpetic neuralgia in elderly patients. The effects of all antivirals discussed in this article, given either orally or intravenously, are comparable with regards to the resolution of virus replication, prevention of dissemination of skin lesions and reduction of acute herpes zoster pain. Valaciclovir (valacyclovir), famciclovir and brivudine (brivudin) are comparably effective in the reduction of the incidence and/or prevention of zoster-associated pain and postherpetic neuralgia. Brivudine 125mg once daily is as effective as famciclovir 250mg three times daily in reducing the prevalence and the duration of zoster-associated pain and postherpetic neuralgia, especially if therapy is combined with a structured-pain therapy. The intensity of the therapy for pain should depend on the intensity of the pain that it is treating. Famciclovir and brivudine offer an advantage over other antivirals because they are administered less frequently; this is particularly relevant for elderly patients who may already be taking a number of medications for other diseases. Therefore, antiviral therapy in combination with adequate pain management should be given to all elderly patients as soon as herpes zoster is diagnosed.

Risk factors for postherpetic neuralgia in patients with herpes zoster

OBJECTIVES

To identify risk factors for postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) using a validated definition of this chronic neuropathic pain syndrome, to determine combinations of risk factors that identify patients with a high risk of developing PHN, and to examine the characteristics of patients with subacute herpetic neuralgia, that is, pain that persists beyond the acute phase of herpes zoster but that resolves before PHN can be diagnosed.

METHODS

The authors examined baseline and follow-up data from 965 herpes zoster patients enrolled within 72 hours of rash onset in two clinical trials of famciclovir.

RESULTS

Univariate and multivariate analyses indicated that older age, female sex, presence of a prodrome, greater rash severity, and greater acute pain severity made independent contributions to identifying which patients developed PHN. Patients with subacute herpetic neuralgia who did not develop PHN were significantly younger and had less severe acute pain than PHN patients but were significantly more likely to have severe and widespread rash than patients without persisting pain.

CONCLUSIONS

The independent contributions to the prediction of PHN made by older age, female sex, presence of a prodrome, greater rash severity, and greater acute pain severity suggest that these risk factors reflect different mechanisms that each contribute to the development of PHN. Subacute herpetic neuralgia that does not progress to PHN may reflect peripheral tissue damage and inflammation caused by a particularly severe or widespread rash.

Current management of postherpetic neuralgia

BACKGROUND

The herpes zoster rash occurs when a dormant varicella zoster virus reactivates in dorsal root and cranial nerve ganglia. Pain that persists in the region where this rash occurred after the cutaneous lesions have healed is termed postherpetic neuralgia (PHN). A wide variety of therapies has been used with varying degrees of success to prevent the occurrence of PHN and to reduce pain with established PHN.

REVIEW SUMMARY

In this review, we discuss the clinical presentation of PHN, current strategies for the prevention and management of this disease, and observations that have increased our understanding of the neural mechanisms involved in PHN.

CONCLUSIONS

Several classes of drugs are effective in attenuating the pain and hyperalgesia caused by PHN, but no single drug leads to the complete relief of symptoms. Additional research is needed to improve treatment strategies and define the role of invasive pain management techniques in cases where PHN is associated with intractable pain.

Acute pain in herpes zoster: the famciclovir database project

The results of a considerable number of recent prospective studies have demonstrated that greater acute pain severity in herpes zoster patients is associated with a significantly greater risk of developing postherpetic neuralgia (PHN). Only a few studies have examined the relationships between acute pain severity and demographic characteristics and clinical features of patients with herpes zoster, however, and the results of these studies have been inconsistent. To clarify these relationships, data from 1778 herpes zoster patients studied within 72 h of rash onset in four clinical trials of the antiviral agent famciclovir were examined. Univariate and multivariate analyses indicated that greater acute pain severity was significantly associated with greater age, female sex, greater rash severity, the presence of a prodrome, and primary involvement of non-trigeminal dermatomes. These results demonstrate that three of the established risk factors for PHN - older age, greater rash severity, and the presence of a prodrome - are also associated with more severe acute pain assessed soon after rash onset in patients with herpes zoster. The results of this study are consistent with the recommendation that herpes zoster patients who are older, who have had a prodrome, or who have severe rash or severe acute pain should be targeted for interventions designed to prevent PHN.

The cancer patient with chronic pain due to herpes zoster

Postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) is the most common complication of herpes zoster, and as such has been an area of extensive medical research for the past three decades. The patients at highest risk for PHN include those older than 50 years, those with severe acute cases of zoster, and those with shingles in a trigeminal distribution. As persons with malignancy are at a high risk for developing zoster itself, PHN is a complication that will be faced by many of these patients and their caregivers. This article reviews the available treatments and preventative measures for this debilitating condition.

Factors influencing pain outcome in herpes zoster: an observational study with valaciclovir. Valaciclovir International Zoster Assessment Group (VIZA)

AIM OF THE STUDY

An observational study with valaciclovir was conducted to assess clinical outcome in herpes zoster, especially pain and associated neurological signs and symptoms in relation to a series of demographic and disease characteristics discernible at presentation. The safety and acceptability of valaciclovir for treatment of zoster was assessed in a wide variety of primary care and clinic referral settings.

METHODS

In total, 1897 immunocompetent adults with clinically diagnosed, localized acute herpes zoster were enrolled in this international, open-label study of valaciclovir. All subjects received treatment with oral valaciclovir (1000 mg three times daily) for 7 days from entry to the study and were asked to record the presence of zoster-associated pain and abnormal sensations throughout treatment and 6 months' follow-up. They were seen frequently in clinic to verify subjective assessments and for evaluation of rash healing. Safety and tolerability were assessed by adverse event monitoring.

RESULTS

Overall, 1191 subjects (63%) were aged > or = 50 years, and 203 (11%) had ophthalmic zoster. Cessation of zoster-associated pain was significantly faster in the younger age group; median times to loss of zoster-associated pain were 23 days and 9 days in the > or = 50 and < 50 years age groups, respectively. Similarly, abnormal sensations resolved significantly more rapidly in the younger subjects; the median duration of abnormal sensations was 31 days in the > or = 50 year olds and 16 days in those aged < 50 years. In cases of ophthalmic zoster, the rate of pain resolution was not different from those with zoster in other dermatomes (median duration of pain 18 vs. 16 days). However, abnormal sensations persisted significantly longer in subjects with ophthalmic zoster than in those with zoster at other sites (47 vs. 22 days). In addition to advancing age, subjects suffering moderate to severe prodromal pain or acute pain during the rash phase were at significantly greater risk of zoster-associated pain and abnormal sensations persisting for longer. Subjects with concomitant neurological disorders were also more likely to develop prolonged abnormal sensations. Valaciclovir treatment was well tolerated, and adverse events were rare and generally mild.

CONCLUSION

This study confirmed the prognostic importance of advancing age and the intensity of prodromal or acute pain as risk factors for prolonged zoster-associated pain and persisting abnormal sensations in the affected dermatome. Ophthalmic zoster and pre-existing neurological disorders are also identified as highly significant risk factors for prolonged abnormal sensations in herpes zoster.

Varicella zoster virus

Because of its ability to produce two clinically distinct disease entities (chickenpox and shingles), varicella zoster virus (VZV) is an unusual etiologic agent. Although in the past viral exanthems were mostly only of academic interest to the practitioner, the development of antiviral agents and the newly approved varicella (OKA) vaccine have increased the clinical significance. Also, with the increasing seroprevalence of HIV infection, more patients will be stricken with zoster (at a younger age) and disseminated varicella. In this review, the history, incidence, pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, and treatment options (of VZV infection and postherpetic neuralgia) will be discussed.

Pain and its persistence in herpes zoster

The nature and duration of pain associated with herpes zoster is highly variable. This review of research on pain in acute herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) explores those observations relevant to the definition and pathogenesis of PHN and the design of treatment trials. A model for the pathogenesis of PHN is presented, which gains support from studies of risk factors. Several directions for future research are identified.

Antiviral therapy of acute herpes zoster in older patients

Although herpes zoster (shingles) can occur in anyone with a history of chickenpox, it is more prevalent and usually more severe in older patients (i.e. persons over 50 years of age). While the cutaneous manifestations of shingles usually resolve in approximately 4 weeks, the pain can persist for several months, or even years in the untreated patient. This pain following healing of the skin, termed post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN), can be very severe. Three well tolerated and effective antiviral drugs are available for the therapy of acute herpes zoster. The nucleoside analogues, aciclovir, famciclovir and valaciclovir, appear to shorten the duration of PHN to a similar degree, but none affects the incidence of PHN. Aciclovir is taken 5 times daily for 7 days, while famciclovir is taken 3 times daily for 7 days. Valaciclovir, the L-valyl ester of aciclovir, when taken orally, produces plasma levels of aciclovir equivalent to those seen following intravenous administration of aciclovir. Valaciclovir has not only been proved to be more efficient than aciclovir (i.e. 3 times daily administration) but also more effective than aciclovir in shortening the duration of PHN. Current studies are determining the relative efficacy of valaciclovir versus famciclovir. Presently, a fourth drug, sorivudine, is being compared with aciclovir for the therapy of acute herpes zoster in older patients, but data from these trials are not yet available. Corticosteroids have been used to treat herpes zoster for much longer than the antiviral drugs, but the effect of corticosteroids on PHN does not appear to be consistent. Corticosteroids plus aciclovir did not provide an added benefit over aciclovir alone in one study but this combination did appear to improve the quality of life of older patients in another investigation. The recent availability of the varicella zoster vaccine may cause shingles to be an uncommon and/or mild disease by the mid twenty-first century. Meanwhile, the search continues for more effective and efficient therapies for acute herpes zoster with the primary goal in older patients to affect the most important sequela of zoster in this population, PHN.

Current experience with antiviral therapy for acute herpes zoster

Inhibition of varicella-zoster virus replication during acute herpes zoster would, theoretically, accelerate cutaneous healing and reduce the pain, both acute and chronic, associated with shingles. Early antiviral drugs were of limited efficacy, excessively toxic, or needed to be given parenterally, and were unsuitable for use in immunocompetent individuals. Acyclovir was a significant advance and remains the antiviral drug of choice for herpes zoster. There is ample evidence for its efficacy in acute illness, but its ability to influence post-herpetic neuralgia is controversial. This review also discusses the role of adjunctive therapy with steroids in acute shingles.

A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of oral acyclovir in postherpetic neuralgia

Twenty-one patients with postherpetic neuralgia of two- to 84-months duration participated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study of oral acyclovir. Pain perception was assessed with the Melzack Pain Questionnaire at baseline and at two-to six-week intervals during the ensuing six months. Clinically significant pain reduction occurred in eight patients: four received acyclovir, and four received a placebo. Several treatment strategies have been advocated for relief of postherpetic neuralgia. Results of the present study demonstrate the need for a double-blind, placebo-controlled paradigm to substantiate the efficacy of new clinical approaches. The same caveat applies to the more common syndromes encountered in psychiatric practice.

Are current therapies useful for the prevention of postherpetic neuralgia? A critical analysis of the literature

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine whether current therapies are useful in preventing postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) by analysis of study designs and pooled results.

DESIGN

Meta-analysis of all controlled studies investigating PHN prevention in the immunocompetent host. Articles were identified through MEDLINE, Index Medicus and bibliographic reviews of major texts and review articles. Studies meeting eligibility criteria were independently assessed using explicit methodologic criteria for validity and generalizability in clinical trials. Pooled analysis was also performed where appropriate.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Twenty-one investigations met eligibility criteria and primarily addressed the use of antiviral agents and corticosteroids. Among studies with strong designs, no evidence of benefit was found for acyclovir or corticosteroids. Pooled results showed no significant effect of acyclovir on the prevention of PHN (odds ratio 0.81, 95% confidence interval 0.56, 1.11). The strongest studies that found potential efficacy in PHN prevention involved adenosine monophosphate and idoxuridine in dimethyl sulfoxide, but problems with clinical application limit the use of these compounds. Outcome definition, compliance assessment, power estimation, and method of randomization were infrequently addressed aspects of design.

CONCLUSION

Currently there is no proven useful therapy for the prevention of PHN. The benefits of acyclovir and corticosteroids are limited but key questions remain regarding these medications. A clear consensus definition of PHN is needed to improve future investigations.

Isoprinosine does not influence the natural history of herpes zoster or postherpetic neuralgia

In a double-blind randomised trial, 38 elderly patients with acute herpes zoster received either isoprinosine (IP) or placebo. IP neither shortened the acute phase of herpes zoster nor prevented postherpetic neuralgia. Transient asymptomatic hyperuricaemia affected one third of IP treated patients. Shortcomings in study design and misleading interpretation of results are common in previously published clinical trials of herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia. Guidelines for future studies are proposed.

Prednisolone does not prevent post-herpetic neuralgia

In a randomised, double-blind, controlled study of the effect of prednisolone on the development of post-herpetic neuralgia 78 patients with herpes zoster whose pain and exanthema had been present for less than 96 h were given 800 mg acyclovir five times daily for 7 days and prednisolone in a total dose of 575 mg, starting with 40 mg daily in the first week and tapering off over the next 2 weeks. 18 (23%) of the patients had post-herpetic neuralgia at 6 months after the acute zoster, 9 (24.3%) having received prednisolone and 9 (22.5%) placebo. The 95% CI for the difference between the placebo and prednisolone groups in the proportion of patients having pain at 6 months was minus 17% to plus 20%. Prednisolone, however, relieved pain for the first 3 days. The 1-2 week interval between admission and reappearance of pain and development of triggered pain seems to be the time needed to establish neuralgia. Once established, the type and intensity of pain remained largely unaltered.

Herpes zoster ophthalmicus and the mesencephalic nucleus. A neuropathological study

The ganglion Gasseri and the brainstem were examined in three old patients with herpes zoster without predisposing diseases with special reference to the mesencephalic trigeminal nucleus. The primary lesions in the semilunar ganglion vary with the length of the course. Secondary changes in the brainstem were as expected from pons to the second cervical segment of the cord. Besides, we observed degeneration, inflammation and glial nodules in the mesencephalic trigeminal nucleus in two patients. According to Brodal this nucleus presumably corresponds to the semilunar and spinal ganglia. As herpes zoster virus is prone to attack the sensory nuclei our findings support this hypothesis.

Oral acyclovir in the therapy of acute herpes zoster ophthalmicus. An interim report

A prospective, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted to study the effects of oral acyclovir on 55 patients with acute herpes zoster ophthalmicus. Treatment with oral acyclovir resulted in more prompt resolution of signs and symptoms, particularly in patients treated within 72 hours after onset of skin rash (P less than 0.05), and shortened the duration of viral shedding (P = 0.02). Vesicular skin lesions involving other dermatomes (microdissemination) occurred in five (19%) placebo-treated patients but in no acyclovir-treated patients (P = 0.03). Interim analysis of this longitudinal study suggests that the incidence and severity of secondary ocular inflammatory disease was reduced by acyclovir. Prolonged observation of these patients is ongoing to determine if oral acyclovir reduces post-herpes zoster neuralgia or the late ocular complications of ophthalmic zoster.

Acyclovir. A review of its pharmacodynamic properties and therapeutic efficacy

Acyclovir (aciclovir) is a nucleoside analogue antiviral drug related to cytarabine, idoxuridine, trifluridine and vidarabine. In common with these earlier antivirals, acyclovir is active against some members of the herpesvirus group of DNA viruses. The efficacy of topical acyclovir has been convincingly demonstrated in ocular herpetic keratitis, and in initial and primary initial genital herpes infection, but little or no clinical benefit was seen when non-primary initial genital infections were assessed separately. Acyclovir ointment demonstrated little benefit in recurrent genital herpes but topical acyclovir cream decreased the course of the infection by 1 to 2 days. Orally and intravenously administered acyclovir were beneficial in initial genital herpes infections, and oral therapy shortened the duration of recurrent infections by 1 to 2 days but did not ameliorate pain. In non-immunocompromised patients with recurrent herpes simplex labialis, generally little clinical benefit was seen with the use of topical acyclovir ointment even when therapy was initiated during the prodromal phase, while topical acyclovir cream effected small but significant improvements in the clinical but not the symptomological course of the disease. However, in immunocompromised patients, both intravenous and topical acyclovir shortened the clinical course of herpes simplex virus infections occurring mainly on the lips, oral mucosa and face, and prophylaxis with either oral or intravenous acyclovir suppressed the appearance of recurrent lesions from latent virus for the period of drug administration, but acyclovir did not eradicate latent herpesviruses. In non-immunocompromised patients, intravenous acyclovir was shown to decrease the acute pain of zoster, especially in the elderly, but postherpetic neuralgia was not ameliorated. When immunocompromised patients were studied, intravenous acyclovir inhibited the progression of zoster infections and shortened the healing time and duration of viral shedding in patients with cutaneous disseminated zoster. However, acute and post-herpetic pain were not significantly affected. Well designed controlled studies are underway to establish the efficacy of acyclovir in herpes simplex encephalitis and cytomegalovirus infections in immunocompromised patients, infections due to Epstein-Barr virus, and neonatal herpesvirus infections. Despite some aspects of the drug's use which require further clarification, acyclovir will make a major impact on the treatment of herpesviral infections. Barring unexpected findings with wider clinical use, it will become the agent of choice in several conditions.