Medical care costs of patients with rheumatoid arthritis during the prebiologics period in Japan: a large prospective observational cohort study

Systematic review and meta-analysis of biosimilar for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis informing the 2020 update of the Japan College of Rheumatology clinical practice guidelines for the management of rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of biosimilars compared with reference biological disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) as a part of the process of developing the 2020 update of the Japan College of Rheumatology guidelines for the management of RA.

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Japan Centra Revuo Medicina were searched for articles to conduct a systematic review (SR). The quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system.

RESULTS

Twenty randomized controlled trials were included (biosimilars of infliximab, etanercept, and adalimumab). A meta-analysis revealed that the risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of achieving the American College of Rheumatology 50% response (ACR50) at week 24 and serious adverse events (SAEs) for biosimilars compared with the reference bDMARDs were 1.04 (0.98-1.10) and 0.84 (0.61-1.18), respectively. The RRs of achieving ACR50 and SAEs at week 24 were respectively 0.93 (0.69-1.26) and 2.15 (0.55-8.35) in the patients who switched to biosimilars from the reference bDMARDs and 0.92 (0.76-1.12) and 1.41 (0.32-6.15) in those who continued the reference bDMARDs.

CONCLUSION

Biosimilars and reference bDMARDs were equally useful for the management of RA.

Cost-effective analysis of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis

The main objective of the study was to perform the pharmacoeconomic analysis of synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis patients. A prospective, observational study was conducted in 98 rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients meeting 2010 Rheumatoid Arthritis Classification Criteria. Treatment-naive RA patients were initiated on synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARD/s) and followed up for 3 months. Average cost-effectiveness analysis was done by taking Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) score as a measure of effectiveness. Out of the 98 RA patients, 15.30% were males and 84.69% females. 80.61% RA patients are seropositive. Majority of the study population patients (55%) were on combination of three synthetic DMARDs and almost a quarter (24.48%) were on combination of two synthetic DMARDs. The mean value of DAS 28 at baseline was 6.07 ± 1.33 and after 3 months treatment, the mean was 3.84 ± 1.11. The mean disability index measured by HAQ-DI was significantly reduced from 1.43 ± 0.71 to 0.81 ± 0.61, p < 0.001, after 3 months treatment. The direct medical cost of treatment of RA per month is 997.05 rupees. The average cost-effectiveness ratio of combination of synthetic DMARDs was 1533.92 rupees. Treatment of RA with synthetic DMARDs controls disease activity and improves disability with reasonable cost of treatment. The majority of the direct medical cost is attributable to cost of medicine and laboratory investigation. Use of quality generic drugs and an early diagnosis would minimize the economic burden on the patient.

Impact of Adalimumab on Work Productivity and Activity Impairment in Japanese Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Large-Scale, Prospective, Single-Cohort ANOUVEAU Study

INTRODUCTION

The Adalimumab Non-interventional Trial for Up-verified Effects and Utility (ANOUVEAU) was a large-scale, multicenter, prospective, observational, single-cohort study that evaluated the effects of adalimumab (ADA) on rheumatoid arthritis (RA)-related work productivity and activity impairment (RA-related WPAI) and disease activity in routine rheumatology care in Japan.

METHODS

Patients with RA were categorized as paid workers (PWs, ≥35 h/week), part-time workers (PTWs, <35 h/week), or homemakers (HMs, unemployed) and were administered the WPAI for RA (WPAI/RA) questionnaire. All patients who received ADA were followed for 48 weeks to evaluate safety and effectiveness.

RESULTS

Of the 1808 patients analyzed, 825, 243, and 740 patients were PWs, PTWs, and HMs, respectively. WPAI/RA domain scores significantly improved at weeks 12, 24, and 48 in all groups, with maximum improvement observed for PWs (p < 0.05). Additionally, remission rates (according to Disease Activity Score 28, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, Simplified Disease Activity Index, or Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index scores) and EuroQol 5-Dimension 3-Level scores significantly increased from baseline to 48 weeks in all groups (p < 0.0001). Analysis of patient subgroups revealed better WPAI/RA outcomes for patients who were biologic-naïve, treated with concomitant methotrexate, or with RA duration of ≤2 years (p < 0.05). The rate of serious adverse events over 48 weeks of ADA treatment was 5.23%.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with ADA provided sustained improvement in WPAI and had an acceptable safety profile in patients with RA.

FUNDING

AbbVie GK and Eisai Co., Ltd.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT01346488.

Treatment patterns of rheumatoid arthritis in Japanese hospitals and predictors of the initiation of biologic agents

OBJECTIVE

To describe the usage of different biologic agents for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Japan over time and to identify factors that affects the decision to initiate treatment with biologic agents. Determinants of a switch to another biologic agent for patients who are already on biologic treatment were also analyzed.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We utilized a hospital claims database containing 36,504 Japanese patients with a confirmed RA diagnosis. To analyze the determinants of treatment choices, we applied logistic regression analysis taking into account socio-demographic and medical factors.

RESULTS

Analyses determined that 11.8% of diagnoses and 25.4% of treated patients in Japan receive a biologic agent. Significant factors associated with biologic treatment initiation include younger age, female sex, and a higher comorbidity index. The route of administration plays a major role when it comes to a switch between different biologic agents.

CONCLUSIONS

The lower likelihood of elderly patients to be initiated on biologic treatment might be explained by the risk aversion of Japanese physicians' and patients who are afraid of the potential side effects of biologics. This finding is also consistent with the notion of an age bias that impedes elderly patients from optimal access to biologic treatment. Because claims data does not contain clinical parameters such as disease activity the results should be validated in a clinical context.

Profiles of EQ-5D utility scores in the daily practice of Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis; Analysis of the IORRA database

OBJECTIVE

Along with the advances of newly developed medical therapies in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), the number of pharmacoeconomical issues has been paid attention rapidly. For cost-utility analysis and determination of quality-adjusted life years, measurement of the EuroQol 5-dimensional descriptive system (EQ-5D) is essential, and has been used in several clinical studies. However, EQ-5D utility measure in Japanese patients with RA, especially in daily practice has not been fully documented. We analyzed the distribution of EQ5D utility scores and investigated the relationship between other clinical measures based on our Institute of Rheumatology, Rheumatoid Arthritis (IORRA) database.

METHOD

Among 5,284 outpatients who participated in the IORRA cohort study on October 2007, data from 5,043 patients who completed the EQ-5D questionnaire were cross-sectionally analyzed. EQ-5D scores in each subgroup for baseline feature such as gender, age, disease activity score 28 (DAS28), and Japanese version of health assessment questionnaire (J-HAQ) were evaluated. For the evaluation of variables that influenced EQ-5D score, the contribution of each variable was evaluated by ANOVA.

RESULTS

Average EQ-5D score was 0.76 in 5,284 patients (84% females, average age: 59.0 years, average disease duration: 12.4 years) whose average DAS28 was 3.3 and average J-HAQ was 0.74. EQ-5D scores were highly correlated with J-HAQ and DAS28, and were significantly lower in females and rheumatoid factor-positive patients. Older age, longer disease duration, higher DAS28, and higher J-HAQ were also significantly associated with lower EQ-5D scores. In multivariate analysis, the factor that most strongly influenced EQ-5D was J-HAQ (57.6%), followed by pain visual analog score (VAS; 12.5%).

CONCLUSION

This study clearly demonstrated the distribution of EQ-5D score in the daily practice of RA patients, and provides important information for the pharmacoeconomical studies in rheumatology.

Cost-effectiveness of tocilizumab, a humanized anti-interleukin-6 receptor monoclonal antibody, versus methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis using real-world data from the IORRA observational cohort study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of tocilizumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in a real-world setting in Japan.

METHODS

The cost-effectiveness was determined using a Markov model-based probabilistic simulation. Data from RA patients registered in the Institute of Rheumatology, Rheumatoid Arthritis (IORRA) cohort study between April 2007 and April 2011 were extracted using a pair-matching method: tocilizumab group (n = 104), patients who used at least 1 disease-modifying anti- rheumatic drug and in whom tocilizumab treatment was initiated; methotrexate group (n = 104), patients in whom methotrexate treatment was initiated for the first time or after an interruption of 6 or more months. Assuming a 6-month cycle length, health benefits and costs were measured over a lifetime and discounted at an annual rate of 3%.

RESULTS

Compared with methotrexate treatment, lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for tocilizumab treatment were approximately 1.5- and 1.3-times higher, respectively. Incremental cost per QALY gained with tocilizumab was $49,359, which was below the assumed cost-effectiveness threshold of $50,000 per QALY. The probability of tocilizumab being cost- effective was 62.2%.

CONCLUSION

The simulation model using real-world data from Japan showed that tocilizumab (at a certain price) may improve treatment cost-effectiveness in patients with moderate-to-severe RA by enhancing quality-adjusted life expectancy.

Vertebral fractures affect functional status in postmenopausal rheumatoid arthritis patients

Functional disability is a major concern in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This retrospective study investigated the risk factors for vertebral fractures (VFs) in postmenopausal RA patients and determined the impact of VFs on functional status. Data from a cohort of 200 postmenopausal RA patients in a single hospital registry were analyzed. Demographic and clinical data, imaging data from spine radiographs, and bone mineral density (BMD) data were collected from the patients at baseline and at the final visit (a mean of 2.9 years after the first visit). Risk factors for incident VFs and their impact on the modified health assessment questionnaire (mHAQ) were analyzed. Twenty-eight patients (14%) developed new VFs (NVFs). Logistic regression analysis adjusted for age, BMI, and disease duration revealed that daily dose of prednisolone, femoral neck BMD, use of active vitamin D3, and use of a bisphosphonate at baseline were factors associated with NVF, with odds ratios (95% confidence interval) of 1.27 (1.05-1.54), 0.94 (0.91-0.97), 0.34 (0.13-0.89), and 0.31 (0.12-0.82), respectively. Patients with NVF exhibited worse mHAQ scores and a greater increase in mHAQ scores from baseline compared with those without NVF. In conclusion, incident VFs were associated with reduced functional status in postmenopausal patients with RA. It is important to prevent VFs to maintain the functional status of RA patients.