Impact of initiation timing of SSRI or SNRI on depressed adolescent healthcare utilization and costs

Healthcare resource use and cost associated with timing of pharmacological treatment for major depressive disorder in the United States: a real-world study

Background: Guidelines recommend selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) and serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRI) as first-line treatments for major depressive disorder (MDD) and emphasize the importance of early pharmacological treatment as key factors to treatment success.Objectives: To compare the MDD-related healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and cost among patients (1) with early vs late pharmacological treatment initiation and (2) achieving minimum therapeutic dose (MTD) early vs late.Methods: The MarketScan database (2010-2015) was used. Adults who were newly-treated with SSRI/SNRI within 12 months after the initial MDD diagnosis (index) were included. Patients who initiated SSRI/SNRI within 2 weeks of the index date were defined as early initiators; those who reached MTD within 4 weeks of index date were defined as early MTD achievers. MDD-related HCRU and costs per year after the index date were compared between early and late initiators and between early and late achievers using propensity score matching and generalized linear models.Results: Of the 55,539 patients, 60% were early initiators and 61% were early MTD achievers. The mean number of MDD-related outpatient visits per year were significantly higher for late initiator (6.7 vs 4.2, p < .001) and late MTD achievers (6.5 vs 4.5, p < .001) vs their early counterparts. Mean annual MDD-related outpatient, drug, and total cost were significantly higher for late initiators and MTD achievers vs the early groups.Conclusions: There is an opportunity to improve outcomes by treating MDD patients with SSRI/SNRI within 2 weeks and at or above the MTD within 4 weeks of diagnosis or less.

Using neuroimaging to evaluate and guide pharmacological and psychotherapeutic treatments for mood disorders in children

Mood disorders are increasing in childhood, and often require multimodal and comprehensive treatment plans to address a complex array of symptoms and associated morbidities. Pharmacotherapy, in combination with psychotherapeutic interventions, is essential for treatment and stabilization. Current evidence supports the use of a number of interventions in children and adolescents diagnosed with DSM-5 mood spectrum disorders, which are associated with impairments in prefrontal-striatal-limbic networks, which are key for emotional functioning and regulation. Yet, little is known about the neurobiological effects of interventions on the developing brain. This chapter provides a synopsis of the literature demonstrating the neural effects of psychotropic medications and psychotherapy in youth with depressive or bipolar spectrum disorders. Additional longitudinal and biological studies are warranted to characterize the effects of these interventions on all phases and stages of mood illness development in children and adolescents.

Safety and tolerability of desvenlafaxine in children and adolescents with major depressive disorder

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess long-term safety and tolerability of desvenlafaxine (administered as desvenlafaxine succinate) in children and adolescents with major depressive disorder (MDD).

METHODS

An 8 week, multicenter, open-label, fixed-dose study of children (ages 7-11 years) and adolescents (ages 12-17 years) with MDD was followed by a 6 month, flexible-dose extension study. Patients were administered desvenlafaxine 10-100 mg/day (children) or 25-200 mg/day (adolescents) for a total of 8 months. Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs), withdrawals because of AEs, laboratory tests, vital signs, and the Columbia Suicide-Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) were collected. Eight month safety results from the lead-in plus extension studies are reported for extension study participants, using lead-in study day -1 as baseline.

RESULTS

Forty patients were enrolled in both studies (20 children; 20 adolescents). Of those, four children and three adolescents withdrew because of AEs. Treatment-emergent AEs reported by three or more patients were upper abdominal pain (15%) and headache (15%) in children, and somnolence (30%), nausea (20%), upper abdominal pain (15%), and headache (15%) in adolescents. Negativism (oppositional behavior) in a child was the single serious AE reported. No deaths occurred during the lead-in or extension studies. Mean pulse rates demonstrated statistically significant increases from lead-in study baseline to final evaluation (children, +5.2 bpm; adolescents, +5.9 bpm; p≤0.05). No statistically significant change in blood pressure was observed at final evaluation. Two adolescents (0 children) reported suicidal ideation on the C-SSRS at screening assessment and during the lead-in and/or extension trials; one adolescent reported suicidal ideation after screening only.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term (8 month) treatment with desvenlafaxine was generally safe and well tolerated in depressed children and adolescents.