1
|
A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study of Self-Reported Adherence and Factors Associated with Analgesic Treatment in People with Chronic Pain. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9113666. [PMID: 33202632 PMCID: PMC7696958 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9113666] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2020] [Revised: 11/09/2020] [Accepted: 11/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
This study aims to shed light on the frequency and associated factors of self-reported adherence to analgesic treatment among chronic pain (CP) patients in the Spanish population. A nationwide cross-sectional study was performed of 1066 Spanish adults, of whom 251 suffered from CP and 168 had been prescribed analgesic treatment. Adherence was assessed using a self-reported direct questionnaire and related factors were collected. Descriptive and bivariate analyses were conducted. Among the 23.5% (95% CI: 21.0–26.2%) of the sample with CP, 66.9% (95% CI: 60.7–72.7%) were taking analgesic treatment prescribed by a doctor, and 81.0% (95% CI: 74.2–86.6%) said they took the treatment as the doctor indicated. However, 17.6% forgot to take the medication, 11% overused them when in great pain, 46.3% stopped the treatment when feeling better and 33.3% when feeling worse, and 7.3% stopped taking them for financial reasons. Higher intensity of pain, polymedication, administration route (injection/patches) and some patient-related factors were associated with self-perceived adherence to treatment. Most Spanish people with CP consider that they are adherent to their analgesic treatment. However, their behavior presents contradictions. It would be advisable for professionals to inform patients about appropriate behavior regarding their therapy recommendations, and to explore potential factors related to non-adherence. This could contribute to improving pain control.
Collapse
|
2
|
The Relation Between Patients' Beliefs About Pain Medication, Medication Adherence, and Treatment Outcome in Chronic Pain Patients: A Prospective Study. Clin J Pain 2020; 35:941-947. [PMID: 31513057 DOI: 10.1097/ajp.0000000000000760] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Nonadherence to prescribed pain medication is common in chronic noncancer pain patients. Beliefs about pain medication have been reported to be associated with nonadherence behavior in cross-sectional studies. The aim of this study was to prospectively investigate the relationship between patients' beliefs about pain medication and their medication adherence and treatment outcome. METHODS Chronic noncancer pain patients completed a baseline questionnaire including the 47-item Pain Medication Attitudes Questionnaire, consisting of 7 subscales with regards to beliefs on prescribed medication. After 11 weeks, medication underuse and overuse were assessed by self-report. In addition, patient satisfaction with regards to the effect of prescribed pain medication and satisfaction as regards prescribed medication and care, and the burden of side effects were assessed. RESULTS A total of 133 participants completed the baseline questionnaire, and 99 patients completed the follow-up questionnaire. Concerns over side effects at baseline were positively associated with underuse and the presence of side effects after 11 weeks. The perceived need was positively associated with overuse, whereas concerns over addiction were negatively associated with overuse. Concerns over tolerance were negatively associated with patient satisfaction with medication effects after 11 weeks. Concerns over tolerance and mistrust in the prescribing doctor were negatively associated with satisfaction about medication and care. CONCLUSION Attitudes and concerns toward pain medication are associated with adherence patterns and outcome parameters. To improve medication adherence and therapy outcome, patient beliefs about pain medication should be taken into account by providing tailored education, adequate follow-up, or alternate therapy.
Collapse
|
3
|
Timmerman L, Stronks DL, Huygen FJPM. The design of a theory-based intervention to improve medication adherence in chronic pain patients. Curr Med Res Opin 2017; 33:1293-1301. [PMID: 28394220 DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2017.1314955] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Non-adherence to pain medication is common in chronic pain patients and may result in unfavorable treatment outcomes. Interventions to improve adherence behavior often fail to significantly change medication use. In this report, we describe the application of a theoretical psychological model of behavior change in order to design an intervention to improve medication adherence in chronic pain patients. METHODS This study applies the Behavior Change Wheel framework and the Behavior Change Techniques Taxonomy to design a theory-based intervention to improve pain medication use. Available literature was used to extract determinants of adherence in chronic pain patients. RESULTS Selected target behaviors to improve medication adherence are: share agreement on follow up policy, monitor medication adherence, provide patient education routinely, discuss attitudes and concerns towards pain medication, develop medication taking habits and use medication reminders. The intervention consists of three components in which relevant behavior change techniques are applied: (1) changes in the electronic patient data management systems to enable medical staff to apply target behaviors; (2) bi-annual education of medical staff to commit the team to the proposed intervention and provide feedback; (3) routine and mandatory education of chronic pain patients following prescription of pain medication. CONCLUSIONS To improve medication adherence in chronic pain patients, most interventions should be focused on providers of pain therapy. Prescribing chronic pain medication should be seen as part of a larger treatment regimen including adequate follow-up, adherence monitoring and patient education during the course of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leon Timmerman
- a Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine , St. Antonius Hospital , Nieuwegein , the Netherlands
| | - Dirk L Stronks
- b Center for Pain Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center , Rotterdam , the Netherlands
| | - Frank J P M Huygen
- b Center for Pain Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center , Rotterdam , the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Stessel B, Theunissen M, Marcus MA, Joosten EA, van Kuijk SMJ, Fiddelers AAA, Peters ML, Hoofwijk DMN, Buhre WFFA, Gramke HF. Prevalence and Predictors of Patient Nonadherence to Pharmacological Acute Pain Therapy at Home After Day Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study. Pain Pract 2017; 18:194-204. [PMID: 28419729 DOI: 10.1111/papr.12589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2016] [Revised: 03/19/2017] [Accepted: 03/30/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Good adherence to prescribed analgesics can be crucial to suppress or even prevent acute postoperative pain after day surgery. The aim of this study was to analyze prevalence and predictors of analgesic nonadherence after day surgery. METHODS Elective patients scheduled for day surgery were prospectively enrolled from November 2008 to April 2010. Outcome parameters were measured by using questionnaire packages at 2 time points: 1 week preoperatively and 4 days postoperatively. The primary outcome parameter was analgesic nonadherence. Adherence was defined according to the patient's response to the questionnaire item "analgesia use as prescribed": full adherence, "yes"; partial adherence, "yes, sometimes"; nonadherence, "no." Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of analgesic nonadherence. RESULTS A total of 1,248 patients were included. The prevalence rates of analgesic nonadherence and partial adherence were 21.6% and 20.0%, respectively, in the total study population but dropped to 9.4% and 19.8%, respectively, in patients with moderate to severe pain. Low postoperative pain intensity and short duration of surgery were the most important predictors of analgesic nonadherence. The most important preoperative predictors for analgesic nonadherence were low preoperative pain intensity, low preoperative expectations of pain, and low fear of short-term effects of surgery. CONCLUSION Analgesic nonadherence and partial adherence are common after day surgery but decrease as average pain intensity increases. Patients at risk for analgesic nonadherence can be identified during the preoperative period based on preoperative pain intensity, preoperative expectations of pain, and fear of surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Björn Stessel
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium.,Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Maurice Theunissen
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Marco A Marcus
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Anesthesia/ICU and Perioperative Medicine, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | - Elbert A Joosten
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Sander M J van Kuijk
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Audrey A A Fiddelers
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Network Acute Care Limburg, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Madelon L Peters
- Department of Clinical Psychological Science, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Daisy M N Hoofwijk
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Wolfgang F F A Buhre
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Hans-Fritz Gramke
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bjørnnes AK, Parry M, Lie I, Fagerland MW, Watt-Watson J, Rustøen T, Stubhaug A, Leegaard M. The impact of an educational pain management booklet intervention on postoperative pain control after cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 2016; 16:18-27. [PMID: 26846145 DOI: 10.1177/1474515116631680] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Relevant discharge information about the use of analgesic medication and other strategies may help patients to manage their pain more effectively and prevent postoperative persistent pain. AIMS To examine patients' pain characteristics, analgesic intake and the impact of an educational pain management booklet intervention on postoperative pain control after cardiac surgery. Concerns about pain and pain medication prior to surgery will also be described. METHODS From March 2012 to September 2013, 416 participants (23% women) were consecutively enrolled in a randomized controlled trial. The intervention group received usual care plus an educational booklet at discharge with supportive telephone follow-up on postoperative day 10, and the control group received only usual care. The primary outcome was worst pain intensity (The Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form). Data about pain characteristics and analgesic use were collected at 2 weeks and at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months post-surgery. General linear mixed models were used to determine between-group differences over time. RESULTS Twenty-nine percent of participants reported surgically related pain at rest and 9% reported moderate to severe pain at 12 months post-surgery. Many participants had concerns about pain and pain medication, and analgesic intake was insufficient post-discharge. No statistically significant differences between the groups were observed in terms of the outcome measures following surgery. CONCLUSION Postoperative pain and inadequate analgesic use were problems for many participants regardless of group allocation, and the current intervention did not reduce worst pain intensity compared with control. Further examination of supportive follow-up monitoring and/or self-management strategies post-discharge is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ann Kristin Bjørnnes
- 1 Department of Research and Development, Division of Emergencies and Critical Care, Oslo University Hospital, Norway and Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway
| | - Monica Parry
- 2 Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Irene Lie
- 3 Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Ullevål/Center for Patient Centered Heart and Lung Research, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Division of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Diseases, Oslo University Hospital, Norway
| | - Morten Wang Fagerland
- 4 Oslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Research Support Services, Oslo University Hospital, Norway
| | - Judy Watt-Watson
- 2 Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Tone Rustøen
- 5 Department of Research and Development, Division of Emergencies and Critical Care, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Health and society, Department of Nursing Science, University of Oslo, Norway
| | - Audun Stubhaug
- 6 Department of Pain Management and Research, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway
| | - Marit Leegaard
- 7 Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Institute of Nursing, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Timmerman L, Stronks DL, Groeneweg JG, Huygen FJ. Prevalence and determinants of medication non-adherence in chronic pain patients: a systematic review. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2016; 60:416-31. [PMID: 26860919 DOI: 10.1111/aas.12697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2015] [Revised: 10/23/2015] [Accepted: 01/13/2016] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic pain is commonly treated with analgesic medication. Non-adherence to prescribed pain medication is very common and may result in sub-optimal treatment outcome. The aim of this review was to investigate the prevalence of medication non-adherence and to present determinants that may help identify patients at risk for non-adherence to analgesic medication. METHODS A search was performed in PubMed and Embase with systematic approach including PRISMA recommendations. Individual risk of bias was assessed and systematic data extraction was performed. RESULTS Twenty-five studies were included. Non-adherence rates to pain prescriptions ranged from 8% to 62% with a weighted mean of 40%. Underuse of pain medication was more common than overuse in most studies. Factors that were commonly positively associated with non-adherence were dosing frequency, polymedication, pain intensity, and concerns about pain medication. Factors negatively associated with non-adherence were age, again pain intensity and quality of the patient-caregiver relationship. Underuse was positively associated with active coping strategies and self-medication, and negatively associated with perceived need for analgesic medication. Overuse was positively associated with perceived need, pain intensity, opioid use, number of prescribed analgesics, a history of drug abuse, and smoking. CONCLUSION Non-adherence to analgesic medication use is very common in the chronic pain population. The choice for pharmacological therapy should not only be based upon pain diagnosis but should also take the risks of non-adherence into account. The value of adherence monitoring or adherence enhancing interventions has to be investigated in future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L. Timmerman
- Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine; St. Antonius Hospital; Nieuwegein The Netherlands
| | - D. L. Stronks
- Center for Pain Medicine; Erasmus MC University Medical Center; Rotterdam The Netherlands
| | - J. G. Groeneweg
- Center for Pain Medicine; Erasmus MC University Medical Center; Rotterdam The Netherlands
| | - F. J. Huygen
- Center for Pain Medicine; Erasmus MC University Medical Center; Rotterdam The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Timmerman L, Stronks DL, Groeneweg G, Huygen FJPM. The Value of Medication-Specific Education on Medication Adherence and Treatment Outcome in Patients with Chronic Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial. PAIN MEDICINE 2016; 17:1829-1837. [PMID: 26921890 DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnw013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Non-adherence to pain medication is common and may jeopardize the effect of prescribed therapy in chronic pain patients. We investigated the effect of medication-specific education on pain medication adherence. METHODS One hundred eligible chronic pain patients were randomized into a control or intervention group. They were assessed during an intake (T0) and two follow-up visits after 4 (T1) and 10 weeks (T2). Immediately after T1, patients in the intervention group additionally watched a video and received written information about the medication prescribed. At T1 and T2, medication adherence according to self-reporting including the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale, prescription knowledge, pain intensity numeric rating scale (NRS), concerns about medication, and patient satisfaction were recorded. RESULTS Experimental group (control versus intervention) did not significantly contribute to the prediction of medication adherence at T2 (P = 0.38). The non-adherence rates were 31% and 43% at T1 and 53% and 49% at T2 in the control and intervention group, respectively. Changes in patients' knowledge of the prescription were attributable to the intervention (P < 0.01). No other significant differences were identified. CONCLUSIONS Medication-specific education did increase knowledge of the prescribed therapy but did not improve adherence or treatment outcome parameters. There was no association between medication adherence and pain treatment outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leon Timmerman
- *Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Dirk L Stronks
- Center for Pain Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - George Groeneweg
- Center for Pain Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frank J P M Huygen
- Center for Pain Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Stessel B, Theunissen M, Fiddelers AA, Joosten EA, Kessels AG, Gramke HF, Marcus MA. Controlled-release oxycodone versus naproxen at home after ambulatory surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Curr Ther Res Clin Exp 2014; 76:120-5. [PMID: 25516773 PMCID: PMC4266769 DOI: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2014.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/04/2014] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Strong opioids in the home setting after ambulatory surgery have rarely been studied for fear of hazardous adverse effects such as respiratory depression. Objectives We compared the efficacy of paracetamol/controlled-release (CR) oxycodone and paracetamol/naproxen for treatment of acute postoperative pain at home after ambulatory surgery. Secondary outcomes were adverse effects of study medication, treatment satisfaction, and postoperative analgesic compliance. Methods Patients undergoing ambulatory knee arthroscopy or inguinal hernia repair surgery (n = 105) were randomized into 3 groups: Group1 paracetamol/naproxen (n = 35), Group 2 paracetamol/CR oxycodone for 24 hours (n = 35), and Group 3 paracetamol/CR oxycodone for 48 hours (n = 35). Pain intensity at movement and at rest using a visual analog scale as well as satisfaction with postoperative analgesia and side effects were recorded for up to 48 hours postoperatively. Compliance with study medication was also assessed. Results For pain at movement and at rest, no significant differences were found between the paracetamol/naproxen group and either the paracetamol/CR oxycodone for 24 hours group (β = 2.6 [4.9]; P = 0.597) or the paracetamol/CR oxycodone for 48 hours (β = –1.7 [5.1]; P = 0.736). No major adverse effects of study medication were registered and satisfaction with postoperative pain treatment was high in all groups. Compliance was comparable across the groups. Despite clear instructions, 8 patients with the lowest pain scores did not use any of the prescribed pain medication. Conclusions Paracetamol/CR oxycodone and paracetamol/naproxen are equally effective in treatment of acute postoperative pain at home after ambulatory surgery with comparable patient satisfaction level. We suggest paracetamol/CR oxycodone to be a valuable alternative for the current paracetamol/naproxen gold standard, particularly in patients with a contraindication for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02152592.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Björn Stessel
- Department of Anesthesiology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Current affiliation: Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Treatment, Jessa Hospital, Stadsomvaart 11, 3500 Hasselt, Belgium
- Address correspondence to: Björn Stessel, MD, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Treatment, Jessa Hospital – Hasselt, Virga-Jesse Campus, Stadsomvaart 11, 3500 Hasselt, Belgium.
| | - Maurice Theunissen
- Department of Anesthesiology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Audrey A. Fiddelers
- Department of Anesthesiology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Elbert A. Joosten
- Department of Anesthesiology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Alfons G. Kessels
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Center+, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Hans-Fritz Gramke
- Department of Anesthesiology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Marco A. Marcus
- Department of Anesthesiology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Current affiliation: Department of Anesthesia/ICU, Pain, and Palliative Care, Hamad Medical Corporation, PO Box 3050, Doha, Qatar
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Timmerman L, Stellema R, Stronks DL, Groeneweg G, Huygen FJPM. Adherence to Pharmacological Pain Therapy in Patients with NonMalignant Pain: The Role of Patients' Knowledge of Pain Medication. Pain Pract 2013; 14:701-8. [DOI: 10.1111/papr.12139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2013] [Accepted: 10/03/2013] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Leon Timmerman
- Department of Anesthesiology; Intensive Care and Pain Medicine; St Antonius Hospital; Nieuwegein The Netherlands
| | - Rudolf Stellema
- Center for Pain Medicine; Erasmus University Hospital; Rotterdam The Netherlands
- Division of Perioperative Care and Emergency Care; University Medical Center Utrecht; Utrecht The Netherlands
| | - Dirk L. Stronks
- Center for Pain Medicine; Erasmus University Hospital; Rotterdam The Netherlands
| | - George Groeneweg
- Center for Pain Medicine; Erasmus University Hospital; Rotterdam The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Determinants of adherence to delayed-release doxylamine and pyridoxine in patients with nausea and vomiting of pregnancy. Ther Drug Monit 2013; 34:569-73. [PMID: 22972538 DOI: 10.1097/ftd.0b013e31826e7997] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Women often hesitate to take medications in pregnancy due to fears of perceived potential fetal damage. The authors' objective is to identify the determinants of adherence to delayed-release doxylamine-pyridoxine (Diclectin) in patients with nausea and vomiting of pregnancy (NVP). METHODS The authors performed a prespecified secondary analysis of a multicenter double-blind randomized controlled trial of Diclectin versus placebo for the treatment of NVP. Data on adherence to study medication were collected in all patients. The primary outcome of this analysis was adherence to study medication, which was determined by pill counting and patient diaries. The treatment regimen in the original trial was not fixed and depended on patient's symptoms. There was no difference in the adherence rates between subjects in the Diclectin or placebo arms of the study, so the 2 arms were analyzed as one cohort. The degree of adherence was analyzed in the various subgroups. Subsequently, a multiple linear regression model was constructed to identify predictors to adherence. RESULTS Two hundred fifty-eight women were included in this analysis. There were no differences in adherence rates according to ethnicity, race, or the presence of adverse events. Gravidity, average number of prescribed tablets per day, site of enrollment, and change in NVP severity measured by the pregnancy unique-quantification of emesis score were associated with adherence. In multivariable analysis, average number of tablets per day, change in pregnancy unique-quantification of emesis, number of treatment days, site of enrollment were significantly predictive of adherence, with the former being negatively correlated. CONCLUSION Adherence to antinauseants for NVP is affected by number of tablets prescribed per day, and treatment duration and effectiveness.
Collapse
|
11
|
Markotic F, Cerni Obrdalj E, Zalihic A, Pehar R, Hadziosmanovic Z, Pivic G, Durasovic S, Grgic V, Banozic A, Sapunar D, Puljak L. Adherence to pharmacological treatment of chronic nonmalignant pain in individuals aged 65 and older. PAIN MEDICINE 2013; 14:247-56. [PMID: 23368967 DOI: 10.1111/pme.12035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Medication nonadherence is a frequent problem in the treatment of chronic conditions. OBJECTIVE To study the adherence to pharmacological treatment of chronic nonmalignant pain, as well as factors and patient attitudes related to nonadherence in patients aged ≥65 years. METHODS The cross-sectional study was conducted with a self-administered questionnaire among 100 patients aged ≥65 years by five family physicians at the Health Care Centre Mostar, Bosnia and Herzegovina. RESULTS According to their own statements, 57% of the patients were nonadherent, while 84% exhibited some form of nonadherence on the Morisky scale. The patients reported a mean pain intensity of 6.6 ± 2.2 on a visual analog scale. The most common deviation from the prescribed therapy was self-adjustment of the dose and medical regimen based on the severity of pain. Polymedication correlated positively with nonadherence. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were the most frequently prescribed medications. The majority of the participants (59%) believed that higher pain intensity indicates progression of the disease, and half of the participants believed that one can easily become addicted to pain medications. Nonadherence was associated with patient attitudes about addiction to analgesics and ability of analgesics to control pain. CONCLUSION.: High pain intensity and nonadherence found in this study suggest that physicians should monitor older patients with chronic nonmalignant pain more closely and pay more attention to patients' beliefs regarding analgesics to ensure better adherence to pharmacological therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filipa Markotic
- Office for monitoring and quality improvement, Clinical Hospital Mostar, Mostar, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Pérez C, Ribera M, Gálvez R, Micó J, Barutell C, Failde I, Sánchez-Magro I, Stern A. High prevalence of confirmed, but also of potential and believed, neuropathic pain in pain clinics. Eur J Pain 2012; 17:347-56. [DOI: 10.1002/j.1532-2149.2012.00204.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/16/2012] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- C. Pérez
- Pain Clinic; Hospital de la Princesa; Madrid; Spain
| | - M.V. Ribera
- Pain Clinic; Hospital Vall d'Hebrón; Barcelona; Spain
| | - R. Gálvez
- Pain Clinic; Hospital Virgen de las Nieves; Granada; Spain
| | - J.A. Micó
- Department of Neurosciences; CIBER of Mental Health, CIBERSAM, Cádiz University; Spain
| | - C. Barutell
- Pain Clinic; Clínica del Pilar Sant Jordi; Barcelona; Spain
| | - I. Failde
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health; Cádiz University; Spain
| | - I. Sánchez-Magro
- Medical Affairs Department; Grünenthal Pharma, S.A.; Madrid; Spain
| | - A. Stern
- Medical Affairs Department; Grünenthal Pharma, S.A.; Madrid; Spain
| |
Collapse
|