1
|
Kruse C, Maier F, Spottke A, Bach JP, Bartels C, Buerger K, Fellgiebel A, Fliessbach K, Frölich L, Hausner L, Hellmich M, Klöppel S, Klostermann A, Kornhuber J, Laske C, Peters O, Priller J, Richter-Schmidinger T, Schneider A, Shah-Hosseini K, Teipel S, von Arnim CAF, Wiltfang J, van der Wurp H, Dodel R, Jessen F. Apathy in patients with Alzheimer's disease is a cost-driving factor. Alzheimers Dement 2023. [PMID: 36588502 DOI: 10.1002/alz.12915] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2022] [Revised: 04/30/2022] [Accepted: 09/02/2022] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Apathy is the most frequent neuropsychiatric symptom in patients with dementia of the Alzheimer's type (DAT). We analyzed the influence of apathy on the resource use of DAT patients and their caregivers. METHODS Included were baseline data of 107 DAT patients from a randomized clinical trial on apathy treatment. The Resource Utilization in Dementia (RUD) instrument assessed costs over a 1-month period prior to baseline. Cost predictors were determined via a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO). RESULTS On average, total monthly costs were €3070, of which €2711 accounted for caregivers' and €359 for patients' costs. An increase of one point in the Apathy Evaluation Scale resulted in a 4.1% increase in total costs. DISCUSSION Apathy is a significant cost driving factor for total costs in mild to moderate DAT. Effective treatment of apathy might be associated with reduced overall costs in DAT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Kruse
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Center for Translational Neurological and Behavioural Research, University Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany
| | - Franziska Maier
- Department of Psychiatry, University Hospital Cologne, Medical Faculty, Cologne, Germany
| | - Annika Spottke
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany.,Department of Neurology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Jan-Philipp Bach
- Department of Neurology, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Claudia Bartels
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Goettingen (UMG), Georg-August-University, Goettingen, Germany
| | - Katharina Buerger
- Institute for Stroke and Dementia Research, Klinikum der Universität München, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität LMU, Munich, Germany.,German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Munich, Germany
| | - Andreas Fellgiebel
- Center for Mental Health in Old Age, Landeskrankenhaus (AöR), Mainz, Germany
| | - Klaus Fliessbach
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany
| | - Lutz Frölich
- Department of Geriatric Psychiatry, Zentralinstitut für Seelische Gesundheit Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Lucrezia Hausner
- Institute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Martin Hellmich
- Institute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Stefan Klöppel
- University Hospital of Old Age Psychiatry, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Arne Klostermann
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Berlin, Germany.,Department of Psychiatry, Charité Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Johannes Kornhuber
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Friedrich Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Christoph Laske
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Tübingen, Germany.,Section for Dementia Research, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research and Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Oliver Peters
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Berlin, Germany.,Department of Psychiatry, Charité Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Josef Priller
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Berlin, Germany.,Department of Neuropsychiatry, Charité Berlin & Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Tanja Richter-Schmidinger
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Friedrich Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Anja Schneider
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany.,Klinik für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen und Gerontopsychiatrie, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Kija Shah-Hosseini
- Institute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Stefan Teipel
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Rostock, Germany.,Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | | | - Jens Wiltfang
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Goettingen (UMG), Georg-August-University, Goettingen, Germany.,German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Goettingen, Germany
| | - Hendrik van der Wurp
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Center for Translational Neurological and Behavioural Research, University Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany.,Department of Statistics, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany
| | - Richard Dodel
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Center for Translational Neurological and Behavioural Research, University Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany.,Department of Neurology, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Frank Jessen
- Department of Psychiatry, University Hospital Cologne, Medical Faculty, Cologne, Germany.,German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany.,Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jönsson L, Tate A, Frisell O, Wimo A. The Costs of Dementia in Europe: An Updated Review and Meta-analysis. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2023; 41:59-75. [PMID: 36376775 PMCID: PMC9813179 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-022-01212-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/19/2022] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE The prevalence of dementia is increasing, while new opportunities for diagnosing, treating and possibly preventing Alzheimer's disease and other dementia disorders are placing focus on the need for accurate estimates of costs in dementia. Considerable methodological heterogeneity creates challenges for synthesising the existing literature. This study aimed to estimate the costs for persons with dementia in Europe, disaggregated into cost components and informative patient subgroups. METHODS We conducted an updated literature review searching PubMed, Embase and Web of Science for studies published from 2008 to July 2021 reporting empirically based cost estimates for persons with dementia in European countries. We excluded highly selective or otherwise biased reports, and used a random-effects meta-analysis to produce estimates of mean costs of care across five European regions. RESULTS Based on 113 studies from 17 European countries, the estimated mean costs for all patients by region were highest in the British Isles (73,712 EUR), followed by the Nordics (43,767 EUR), Southern (35,866 EUR), Western (38,249 EUR), and Eastern Europe and Baltics (7938 EUR). Costs increased with disease severity, and the distribution of costs over informal and formal care followed a North-South gradient with Southern Europe being most reliant on informal care. CONCLUSIONS To our knowledge, this study represents the most extensive meta-analysis of the cost for persons with dementia in Europe to date. Though there is considerable heterogeneity across studies, much of this is explained by identifiable factors. Further standardisation of methodology for capturing resource utilisation data may further improve comparability of future studies. The cost estimates presented here may be of value for cost-of-illness studies and economic evaluations of novel diagnostic technologies and therapies for Alzheimer's disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linus Jönsson
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.
| | - Ashley Tate
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden
| | - Oskar Frisell
- Institute of Health Economics (IHE), Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anders Wimo
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Frederiksen KS, Lanctôt KL, Weidner W, Hahn-Pedersen JH, Mattke S. A Literature Review on the Burden of Alzheimer's Disease on Care Partners. J Alzheimers Dis 2023; 96:947-966. [PMID: 37980660 DOI: 10.3233/jad-230487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many individuals with Alzheimer's disease (AD) are dependent on nonprofessional care partners. Providing informal care can result in emotional, physical, and financial burdens; however, there is a need for a better understanding of the impact of AD on care partners to support the clinical and economic assessment of potential new treatments. OBJECTIVE We conducted a literature review to evaluate the burden experienced by care partners of individuals with AD. METHODS Electronic screening and supplementary searches identified studies published from 2011 to 2022 describing the association between AD and the quality of life (QoL) and physical health of care partners, and the economic or financial burden of AD. RESULTS Following electronic screening, 62, 25, and 39 studies were included on care partner burden, cost, and healthcare resource use in AD, respectively. Supplementary searches identified an additional 32 studies, resulting in 149 unique studies. These studies showed that care partners of individuals with AD report moderate to severe burden. Higher burden and lower QoL were observed in those caring for individuals with more severe AD. Care partners of individuals with AD experience higher burden, lower QoL, and higher levels of stress, depression, and anxiety than those without caring responsibilities. Informal care costs increased with AD severity and accounted for the greatest proportion of overall societal cost. CONCLUSIONS Care partners of individuals with AD experience emotional and economic burden, which increases with AD severity. These impacts should be quantified comprehensively in future studies and captured in economic evaluations of AD interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristian Steen Frederiksen
- Danish Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Krista L Lanctôt
- Hurvitz Brain Sciences Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | | | - Soeren Mattke
- Center for Economic and Social Research, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, US
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kosteniuk J, Osman BA, Osman M, Quail JM, Islam N, O'Connell ME, Kirk A, Stewart NJ, Morgan D. Health service use before and after dementia diagnosis: a retrospective matched case-control study. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e067363. [PMID: 36428015 PMCID: PMC9703329 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067363] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study investigated patterns in health service usage among older adults with dementia and matched controls over a 10-year span from 5 years before until 5 years after diagnosis. DESIGN Population-based retrospective matched case-control study. SETTING Administrative health data of individuals in Saskatchewan, Canada from 1 April 2008 to 31 March 2019. PARTICIPANTS The study included 2024 adults aged 65 years and older living in the community at the time of dementia diagnosis from 1 April 2013 to 31 March 2014, matched 1:1 to individuals without a dementia diagnosis on age group, sex, rural versus urban residence, geographical region and comorbidity. OUTCOME MEASURES For each 5-year period before and after diagnosis, we examined usage of health services each year including family physician (FP) visits, specialist visits, hospital admissions, all-type prescription drug dispensations and short-term care admissions. We used negative binomial regression to estimate the effect of dementia on yearly average health service utilisation adjusting for sex, age group, rural versus urban residence, geographical region, 1 year prior health service use and comorbidity. RESULTS Adjusted findings demonstrated that 5 years before diagnosis, usage of all health services except hospitalisation was lower among persons with dementia than persons without dementia (all p<0.001). After this point, differences in higher health service usage among persons with dementia compared to without dementia were greatest in the year before and year after diagnosis. In the year before diagnosis, specialist visits were 59.7% higher (p<0.001) and hospitalisations 90.5% higher (p<0.001). In the year after diagnosis, FP visits were 70.0% higher (p<0.001) and all-type drug prescriptions 29.1% higher (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Findings suggest the year before and year after diagnosis offer multiple opportunities to implement quality supports. FPs are integral to dementia care and require effective resources to properly serve this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Kosteniuk
- Canadian Centre for Health and Safety in Agriculture, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Beliz Açan Osman
- Saskatchewan Health Quality Council, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Meric Osman
- Saskatchewan Medical Association, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | | | - Naorin Islam
- College of Pharmacy and Nutrition, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Megan E O'Connell
- Department of Psychology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Andrew Kirk
- Department of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Norma J Stewart
- College of Nursing, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Debra Morgan
- Canadian Centre for Health and Safety in Agriculture, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tahami Monfared AA, Byrnes MJ, White LA, Zhang Q. The Humanistic and Economic Burden of Alzheimer's Disease. Neurol Ther 2022; 11:525-551. [PMID: 35192176 PMCID: PMC9095804 DOI: 10.1007/s40120-022-00335-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2021] [Accepted: 02/03/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the leading cause of cognitive impairment and dementia in older individuals (aged ≥ 65 years) throughout the world. As a result of these progressive deficits in cognitive, emotional, and physical function, AD dementia can cause functional disability and loss of independence. To gain a deeper understanding of the recent literature on the burden of AD, including that of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) due to AD, we conducted a comprehensive targeted review of the PubMed-indexed literature (2014 to 2021) to examine the humanistic and economic burden of AD (including MCI) in North America, Europe, and Asia. Our literature review identified a range of factors associated with quality of life (QoL): some factors were positively associated with QoL, including caregiver relationship, religiosity, social engagement, and ability to engage in activities of daily living (ADL), whereas other factors such as neuropsychiatric symptoms were associated with poorer QoL. While patient- and proxy-rated QoL are highly correlated in patients with early AD dementia, proxy-rated QoL declines more substantially as severity worsens. The maintenance of self-reported QoL in patients with more severe AD dementia may be due to lack of awareness or to adaptation to circumstances. Compared to persons with normal cognition, MCI is associated with a greater cost burden, and individuals with MCI exhibit worse QoL. Key drivers of the societal economic burden of AD include disease severity, dependence level, institutionalization, and comorbidity burden. Evaluation of the impact of a hypothetical disease-modifying treatment delaying the progression from MCI to AD has suggested that such a treatment may result in cost savings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amir Abbas Tahami Monfared
- Eisai, 200 Metro Blvd, Nutley, NJ, 07110, USA. .,McGill University, Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, Montreal, QC, Canada.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sontheimer N, Konnopka A, König HH. The Excess Costs of Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Alzheimers Dis 2021; 83:333-354. [PMID: 34334395 DOI: 10.3233/jad-210174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dementia is one of the costliest diseases for health care systems with growing importance for policy makers. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to systematically review the current literature of excess cost studies for dementia and to analyze excess costs in a meta-analysis. METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, EconLit, NHS-EED, and Cochrane Library. 22 studies were included and assigned to one of three subgroups according to the time period that they analyzed during disease progression: the time of diagnosis, the time between diagnosis and death, and the time prior to death. Excess costs were analyzed using the ratio of means (ROM) and meta-analysis was performed by pooling ROMs in a random effects model. RESULTS Total costs were significantly higher for demented persons compared to non-demented persons at the time of diagnosis (ROM: 2.08 [1.71, 2.54], p < 0.00001, I2 = 98%) and in the time period between diagnosis and death (ROM: 2.19 [1.97, 2.44], p < 0.00001, I2 = 100%). The ROM was highest for professional home care (ROM: 4.96 [2.62, 9.40], p < 0.0001, I2 = 88%) and for nursing facilities (ROM: 4.02 [2.53, 6.40], p < 0.00001, I2 = 100%) for the time period between diagnosis and death. CONCLUSION This meta-analysis is the first to assess excess costs of dementia by the ROM method on a global scale. We conclude that our findings demonstrate that costs of dementia constitute a substantial economic burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadine Sontheimer
- Department of Health Economics and Health Services Research, Hamburg Center for Health Economics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Alexander Konnopka
- Department of Health Economics and Health Services Research, Hamburg Center for Health Economics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Hans-Helmut König
- Department of Health Economics and Health Services Research, Hamburg Center for Health Economics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gallini A, Jegou D, Lapeyre-Mestre M, Couret A, Bourrel R, Ousset PJ, Fabre D, Andrieu S, Gardette V. Development and Validation of a Model to Identify Alzheimer's Disease and Related Syndromes in Administrative Data. Curr Alzheimer Res 2021; 18:142-156. [PMID: 33882802 DOI: 10.2174/1567205018666210416094639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2020] [Revised: 03/12/2021] [Accepted: 03/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Administrative data are used in the field of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Syndromes (ADRS), however their performance to identify ADRS is unknown. OBJECTIVE i) To develop and validate a model to identify ADRS prevalent cases in French administrative data (SNDS), ii) to identify factors associated with false negatives. METHODS Retrospective cohort of subjects ≥ 65 years, living in South-Western France, who attended a memory clinic between April and December 2013. Gold standard for ADRS diagnosis was the memory clinic specialized diagnosis. Memory clinics' data were matched to administrative data (drug reimbursements, diagnoses during hospitalizations, registration with costly chronic conditions). Prediction models were developed for 1-year and 3-year periods of administrative data using multivariable logistic regression models. Overall model performance, discrimination, and calibration were estimated and corrected for optimism by resampling. Youden index was used to define ADRS positivity and to estimate sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive and negative probabilities. Factors associated with false negatives were identified using multivariable logistic regressions. RESULTS 3360 subjects were studied, 52% diagnosed with ADRS by memory clinics. Prediction model based on age, all-cause hospitalization, registration with ADRS as a chronic condition, number of anti-dementia drugs, mention of ADRS during hospitalizations had good discriminative performance (c-statistic: 0.814, sensitivity: 76.0%, specificity: 74.2% for 2013 data). 419 false negatives (24.0%) were younger, had more often ADRS types other than Alzheimer's disease, moderate forms of ADRS, recent diagnosis, and suffered from other comorbidities than true positives. CONCLUSION Administrative data presented acceptable performance for detecting ADRS. External validation studies should be encouraged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adeline Gallini
- CERPOP, Universite de Toulouse, Inserm, UPS, Toulouse, France
| | - David Jegou
- CERPOP, Universite de Toulouse, Inserm, UPS, Toulouse, France
| | | | - Anaïs Couret
- CERPOP, Universite de Toulouse, Inserm, UPS, Toulouse, France
| | - Robert Bourrel
- Caisse Nationale d'Assurance Maladie des Travailleurs Salaries (CNAMTS), Echelon Regional du Service Medical Midi-Pyrenees - F31000 Toulouse, France
| | - Pierre-Jean Ousset
- CHU Toulouse, Centre Memoire de Ressources et de Recherches - F31000 Toulouse, France
| | - D Fabre
- CHU Toulouse, Departement D'information Medicale - F31000 Toulouse, France
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Maresova P, Hruska J, Klimova B, Barakovic S, Krejcar O. Activities of Daily Living and Associated Costs in the Most Widespread Neurodegenerative Diseases: A Systematic Review. Clin Interv Aging 2020; 15:1841-1862. [PMID: 33061334 PMCID: PMC7538005 DOI: 10.2147/cia.s264688] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2020] [Accepted: 09/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Nowadays, the population is rapidly ageing because of increasing life expectancy and decreasing birth rates. Thus, the purpose of this systematic review is to prepare a comprehensive overview which identifies the activities of daily living (ADLs) that are gradually reduced among patients with dementia, as well as explore the therapies applied in relation to dementia and how they effectively improve the quality of life (QoL) of patients and caregivers. Furthermore, we aim to summarise the ADL activities influenced by therapies and examine the treatment costs and care for patients so that recommendations for research and development (R&D) can be made to improve both the QoL of people with dementia and cost-saving measures. The research focuses on four selected neurodegenerative diseases: Alzheimer, Parkinson, vascular dementia, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Therefore, the peer-reviewed English written articles from 2014 to 2019 were searched between September 1 and December 13, 2019. Twenty-seven papers were included in the analysis. The results show that essential assistance occurs in connection with activities: eating, drinking, dressing, bathing, personal hygiene, use of the toilet, and transport. By contrast, shopping or cleaning is not addressed as much. A lower ability to take care of oneself is connected with poor patient health and higher social care costs because the patient requires care from external sources, such as home aid or nurse visits. The challenge that remains is to shift new knowledge from scientific disciplines and connect it with the needs of patients to remove legitimate barriers and increase the acceptance of new solutions by popularisation. Additionally, regarding the burden on caregivers, it would be appropriate to promote this area of education and employment so that family members can use formal caregivers, ensuring them free time and much-needed rest.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petra Maresova
- Department of Economics, Faculty of Informatics and Management, University of Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove 500 03, Czech Republic
| | - Jan Hruska
- Department of Economics, Faculty of Informatics and Management, University of Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove 500 03, Czech Republic
| | - Blanka Klimova
- Department of Applied Linguistics, Faculty of Informatics and Management, University of Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove 500 03, Czech Republic
| | - Sabina Barakovic
- Faculty of Transport and Communications, University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo 71000, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Ondrej Krejcar
- Center for Basic and Applied Science, Faculty of Informatics and Management, University of Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove 500 03, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
El-Hayek YH, Wiley RE, Khoury CP, Daya RP, Ballard C, Evans AR, Karran M, Molinuevo JL, Norton M, Atri A. Tip of the Iceberg: Assessing the Global Socioeconomic Costs of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias and Strategic Implications for Stakeholders. J Alzheimers Dis 2020; 70:323-341. [PMID: 31256142 PMCID: PMC6700654 DOI: 10.3233/jad-190426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 120] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
While it is generally understood that Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and related dementias (ADRD) is one of the costliest diseases to society, there is widespread concern that researchers and policymakers are not comprehensively capturing and describing the full scope and magnitude of the socioeconomic burden of ADRD. This review aimed to 1) catalogue the different types of AD-related socioeconomic costs described in the literature; 2) assess the challenges and gaps of existing approaches to measuring these costs; and 3) analyze and discuss the implications for stakeholders including policymakers, healthcare systems, associations, advocacy groups, clinicians, and researchers looking to improve the ability to generate reliable data that can guide evidence-based decision making. A centrally emergent theme from this review is that it is challenging to gauge the true value of policies, programs, or interventions in the ADRD arena given the long-term, progressive nature of the disease, its insidious socioeconomic impact beyond the patient and the formal healthcare system, and the complexities and current deficiencies (in measures and real-world data) in accurately calculating the full costs to society. There is therefore an urgent need for all stakeholders to establish a common understanding of the challenges in evaluating the full cost of ADRD and define approaches that allow us to measure these costs more accurately, with a view to prioritizing evidence-based solutions to mitigate this looming public health crisis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ryan E Wiley
- Shift Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | - José Luis Molinuevo
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center, Barcelona, Spain.,Paqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Alireza Atri
- Banner Sun Health Research Institute, Banner Health, Sun City, AZ, USA.,Department of Neurology, Center for Brain/Mind Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gustavsson A, Pemberton-Ross P, Gomez Montero M, Hashim M, Thompson R. Challenges in demonstrating the value of disease-modifying therapies for Alzheimer’s disease. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2020; 20:563-570. [DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2020.1822738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Anders Gustavsson
- Quantify Research, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | | | | | - Robin Thompson
- Value & Access, Biogen International GmbH, Baar, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wohlgemuth A, Michalowsky B, Wucherer D, Eichler T, Thyrian JR, Zwingmann I, Rädke A, Hoffmann W. Drug-Related Problems Increase Healthcare Costs for People Living with Dementia. J Alzheimers Dis 2019; 73:791-799. [PMID: 31884468 DOI: 10.3233/jad-190819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Drug-related problems (DRP) are common in the elderly population, especially in people living with dementia (PwD). DRP are associated with adverse outcomes that could result in increased costs. OBJECTIVE The objective of the study was to analyze the association between DRP and healthcare costs in PwD. METHODS The analysis was based on the cross-sectional data of 424 PwD. Compliance, adverse effects, and drug administration of prescribed and over-the-counter drugs taken were assessed. DRP were identified and classified by pharmacists using an adapted German version of "PIE-Doc®". Healthcare utilization was assessed retrospectively used to calculated costs from a public payer perspective using standardized unit costs. The associations between DRP and healthcare costs were analyzed using multiple linear regression models. RESULTS 394 PwD (93%) had at least one DRP. An inappropriate drug choice was significantly associated with increased total costs (b = 2,718€; CI95% 1,448-3,988) due to significantly higher costs for hospitalization (b = 1,936€; 670-3,202) and for medications (b = 417€; 68-765). Problems with medication dosage and drug interactions were significantly associated with higher medication costs (b = 679€; 31-1,328; and b = 630€; 259-1,001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS DRP could significantly lead to adverse outcomes for PwD and healthcare payers, reflected by a higher hospitalization and costs, respectively. Further research is needed to clarify on interventions and approaches efficiently avoiding DRP and on the effect on patient-reported and economic outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Wohlgemuth
- German Centre for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), site Rostock/Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Bernhard Michalowsky
- German Centre for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), site Rostock/Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Diana Wucherer
- German Centre for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), site Rostock/Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Tilly Eichler
- German Centre for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), site Rostock/Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Jochen René Thyrian
- German Centre for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), site Rostock/Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Ina Zwingmann
- German Centre for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), site Rostock/Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Anika Rädke
- German Centre for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), site Rostock/Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Hoffmann
- German Centre for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), site Rostock/Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.,Institute for Community Medicine, Section Epidemiology of Health Care and Community Health, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bohlken J, Jacob L, Kostev K. Association Between the Use of Antihyperglycemic Drugs and Dementia Risk: A Case-Control Study. J Alzheimers Dis 2019; 66:725-732. [PMID: 30320593 DOI: 10.3233/jad-180808] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a conflicting literature on the association between the use of antihyperglycemic drugs and dementia risk. OBJECTIVE The goal of this case-control study was to analyze the association between the use of antihyperglycemic drugs and dementia risk in patients followed in general practices in Germany. METHODS This study included patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who had received a first dementia diagnosis in 972 general practices in Germany between January 2013 and December 2017 (index date). Controls without dementia were matched (1:1) to cases by age, gender, index year, and physician. Two multivariate regression models were used to study the association between the use of antihyperglycemic drugs and dementia risk. Model 1 included all antihyperglycemic drugs prescribed to patients regardless of the prescription duration, whereas Model 2 only included the longest therapy prescribed to each patient. RESULTS There were 8,276 diabetes patients with dementia and 8,276 diabetes patients without dementia included in this study. In Model 1, glitazones were associated with a decreased dementia risk (odds ratio [OR] = 0.80), whereas insulin was associated with an increased risk of developing the condition (OR = 1.34). In Model 2, metformin, prescribed as monotherapy (OR = 0.71) or as dual therapy with sulfonylureas (OR = 0.90), was associated with a decrease in the likelihood of subsequently being diagnosed with dementia. By contrast, the combination of basal insulin and bolus insulin (OR = 1.47) and premix insulin (OR = 1.33) were risk factors for dementia. CONCLUSION Metformin and glitazones were negatively associated with dementia, while insulin was positively associated with dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Louis Jacob
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Paris 5, Paris, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Shepherd H, Livingston G, Chan J, Sommerlad A. Hospitalisation rates and predictors in people with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med 2019; 17:130. [PMID: 31303173 PMCID: PMC6628507 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-019-1369-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 111] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2019] [Accepted: 06/14/2019] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hospitalisation is often harmful for people with dementia and results in high societal costs, so avoidance of unnecessary admissions is a global priority. However, no intervention has yet reduced admissions of community-dwelling people with dementia. We therefore aimed to examine hospitalisation rates of people with dementia and whether these differ from people without dementia and to identify socio-demographic and clinical predictors of hospitalisation. METHODS We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO from inception to 9 May 2019. We included observational studies which (1) examined community-dwelling people with dementia of any age or dementia subtype, (2) diagnosed dementia using validated diagnostic criteria, and (3) examined all-cause general (i.e. non-psychiatric) hospital admissions. Two authors screened abstracts for inclusion and independently extracted data and assessed included studies for risk of bias. Three authors graded evidence strength using Cochrane's GRADE approach, including assessing for evidence of publication bias using Begg's test. We used random effects meta-analysis to pool estimates for hospitalisation risk in people with and without dementia. RESULTS We included 34 studies of 277,432 people with dementia: 17 from the USA, 15 from Europe, and 2 from Asia. The pooled relative risk of hospitalisation for people with dementia compared to those without was 1.42 (95% confidence interval 1.21, 1.66) in studies adjusted for age, sex, and physical comorbidity. Hospitalisation rates in people with dementia were between 0.37 and 1.26/person-year in high-quality studies. There was strong evidence that admission is associated with older age, and moderately strong evidence that multimorbidity, polypharmacy, and lower functional ability are associated with admission. There was strong evidence that dementia severity alone is not associated. CONCLUSIONS People with dementia are more frequently admitted to hospital than those without dementia, independent of physical comorbidities. Future interventions to reduce unnecessary hospitalisations should target potentially modifiable factors, such as polypharmacy and functional ability, in high-risk populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hilary Shepherd
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, 6th Floor, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK
| | - Gill Livingston
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, 6th Floor, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK
- Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, 4 St Pancras Way, London, NW1 0PE, UK
| | - Justin Chan
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, 6th Floor, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK
| | - Andrew Sommerlad
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, 6th Floor, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK.
- Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, 4 St Pancras Way, London, NW1 0PE, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ökonomische und gesellschaftliche Herausforderungen der Demenz in Deutschland – Eine Metaanalyse. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 2019; 62:981-992. [DOI: 10.1007/s00103-019-02985-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
15
|
Möllers T, Perna L, Ihle P, Schubert I, Bauer J, Brenner H. Factors Associated with Length of Stay in Hospital Patients with and Without Dementia. J Alzheimers Dis 2019; 67:1055-1065. [DOI: 10.3233/jad-180593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Tobias Möllers
- Network Aging Research, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany
- Medical Faculty, University of Heidelberg, Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany
| | - Laura Perna
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany
| | - Peter Ihle
- PMV Research Group, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University of Cologne, Cologne, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
| | - Ingrid Schubert
- PMV Research Group, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University of Cologne, Cologne, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
| | - Jürgen Bauer
- Network Aging Research, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany
- Center for Geriatric Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Agaplesion Bethanien Krankenhaus Heidelberg, Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany
| | - Hermann Brenner
- Network Aging Research, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Möllers T, Stocker H, Wei W, Perna L, Brenner H. Length of hospital stay and dementia: A systematic review of observational studies. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2019; 34:8-21. [PMID: 30260050 DOI: 10.1002/gps.4993] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2018] [Accepted: 08/18/2018] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Hospitalizations of people with dementia (PWD) are often accompanied by complications or functional loss and can lead to adverse outcomes. Unsystematic findings suggest an influence of comorbidities on the extent of differences in the length of hospital stay (LOS). This systematic review aimed to identify and evaluate all studies reporting LOS in PWD as compared to PwoD in general hospitals. METHODS A systematic review of observational studies using PubMed and ISI Web of Knowledge. Inclusion criteria comprised original studies written in English or German, assessment of diagnosis of dementia, measurement of LOS, and comparison of people with and without dementia. RESULTS Fifty-two of 60 studies reported a longer hospitalization time for PWD compared to PwoD. The extent of the difference in LOS varied between and within countries as well as by type of primary morbidity (eg, injuries, cardiovascular diseases). The range of the LOS difference for studies without restriction to a primary morbidity was -2 to +22 days after matching or adjustment for a variable number and selection of potentially relevant covariates. For studies with injuries/fractures/medical procedures and infectious/vascular disease as the primary morbidity, the range was -2.9 to +12.4 and -11.2 to +21.8 days, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The majority of studies reported a longer hospitalization of PWD compared to PwoD. Length of hospital stay seems to be influenced by a variety of medical, social, organizational factors, including reasons for hospital admission, whose role should be explored in detail in further research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tobias Möllers
- Network Aging Research, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hannah Stocker
- Network Aging Research, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Wenjia Wei
- Network Aging Research, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Laura Perna
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hermann Brenner
- Network Aging Research, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Bernardes C, Massano J, Freitas A. Hospital admissions 2000-2014: A retrospective analysis of 288 096 events in patients with dementia. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2018; 77:150-157. [PMID: 29775774 DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2018.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2018] [Revised: 04/12/2018] [Accepted: 05/07/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Dementia is a leading cause of disability worldwide. It is associated with an increased risk of hospitalization, imposing a significant burden on healthcare systems. The evidence on the long-term evolution of this issue and broadly on healthcare systems is currently limited. This study aims to describe the hospitalizations of people who received a diagnosis of dementia admitted to public general hospitals in a western European country with universal health coverage, over more than a decade. METHODS This retrospective observational study analyzed all inpatient episodes from 2000 to 2014 with a primary or secondary diagnosis of dementia using a national hospitalization database from mainland Portuguese public hospitals. RESULTS A total of 288 096 hospital admissions were registered. Hospitalization rates increased 4.7 times throughout the study period. Pneumonia and urinary tract infections were the most frequent main diagnoses, while dementia itself was the cause of admission in a minority (6.8%) of cases. Cerebrovascular disease, diabetes without chronic complications, and congestive heart failure were the most prevalent comorbidities; 5.9% of patients with dementia admitted to hospital underwent a surgical procedure, orthopedic surgeries being the most frequent. The median length of hospital stay was 8.0 days, and in-hospital mortality rate was 16.1%. CONCLUSIONS Dementia patients represent a significant amount of hospital admissions. Most leading causes of hospital admissions are preventable if timely diagnosed and could be effectively managed in the outpatient setting. These findings may be useful for healthcare resource planning and allocation. Further research should drive evidence-based reorganization of health care systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catarina Bernardes
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences and Mental Health, Faculty of Medicine University of Porto, Portugal
| | - João Massano
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences and Mental Health, Faculty of Medicine University of Porto, Portugal; Department of Neurology, Centro Hospitalar de São João, Porto, Portugal.
| | - Alberto Freitas
- Department of Community Medicine, Information and Health Decision Sciences (MEDCIDS), Faculty of Medicine University of Porto, Portugal; CINTESIS - Center for Health Technology and Services Research, University of Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Lenox-Smith A, Reed C, Lebrec J, Belger M, Jones RW. Resource utilisation, costs and clinical outcomes in non-institutionalised patients with Alzheimer's disease: 18-month UK results from the GERAS observational study. BMC Geriatr 2016; 16:195. [PMID: 27887645 PMCID: PMC5124297 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-016-0371-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2016] [Accepted: 11/16/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Alzheimer's disease (AD), the commonest cause of dementia, represents a significant cost to UK society. This analysis describes resource utilisation, costs and clinical outcomes in non-institutionalised patients with AD in the UK. METHODS The GERAS prospective observational study assessed societal costs associated with AD for patients and caregivers over 18 months, stratified according to baseline disease severity (mild, moderate, or moderately severe/severe [MS/S]). All patients enrolled had an informal caregiver willing to participate in the study. Healthcare resource utilisation was measured using the Resource Utilization in Dementia instrument, and 18-month costs estimated by applying unit costs of services and products (2010 values). Total societal costs were calculated using an opportunity cost approach. RESULTS Overall, 526 patients (200 mild, 180 moderate and 146 MS/S at baseline) were recruited from 24 UK centres. Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores deteriorated most markedly in the MS/S patient group, with declines of 3.6 points in the mild group, 3.5 points in the moderate group and 4.7 points in the MS/S group; between-group differences did not reach statistical significance. Patients with MS/S AD dementia at baseline were more likely to be institutionalised (Kaplan-Meier probability 28% versus 9% in patients with mild AD dementia; p < 0.001 for difference across all severities) and had a greater probability of death (Kaplan-Meier probability 15% versus 5%; p = 0.013) at 18 months. Greater disease severity at baseline was also associated with concomitant increases in caregiver time and mean total societal costs. Total societal costs of £43,560 over 18 months were estimated for the MS/S group, versus £25,865 for the mild group and £30,905 for the moderate group (p < 0.001). Of these costs, over 50% were related to informal caregiver costs at each AD dementia severity level. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrated a mean deterioration in MMSE score over 18 months in patients with AD. It also showed that AD is a costly disease, with costs increasing with disease severity, even when managed in the community: informal caregiver costs represented the main contributor to societal costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Mark Belger
- Eli Lilly and Company, Erl Wood, Windlesham, UK
| | - Roy W Jones
- RICE (The Research Institute for the Care of Older People), Royal United Hospital, Bath, UK
| |
Collapse
|