Impact of initiation of asenapine on patterns of utilization and cost of healthcare resources associated with the treatment of bipolar I disorder

Impact of EU risk assessment process and administrative regulations for manufacturers of combined hormonal contraceptive prescribing. An analysis of developments in Germany and the implications

OBJECTIVE

Combined hormonal contraceptives (CHC) exhibit differing risks for cardiovascular and thrombotic events (VTE). A European referral process confirmed higher VTE risks for 3^rd generation gestagens and drospirenone. CHC are now grouped in risk classes (RC) I, II, and III, with RC III having a higher risk than RC I and X (risk not yet known). Marketing authorization holders were obliged to implement pharmacovigilance measures and risk minimization measures including changes of prescribing information. The study assessed whether these activities induced changes in prescription patterns.

METHODS

German prescription data for 1.1 million women below 20 years of age were used to analyze the effects of interventions and potential influence factors using logistic regression. Descriptive statistics were calculated for prescriptions for 3.3 million women from January 2011 to March 2016.

RESULTS

Shares of RC I and RC X recipients rose substantially over the observation period, while RC III recipient share showed a steady decrease. The referral induced a slightly faster decrease in RC III and increase in RC X. The implementation of pharmacovigilance measures manifested no additional effect.

CONCLUSION

The decrease in RC III share already observed before the referral process can be explained with pre-existing discussions around CHC. The effect attributable to the referral was statistically significant, although very small. While evidence for a connection between interventions and prescription change is only indirect, the study shows that routine data are suitable for impact analyses, and monitoring prescribing patterns can be recommended as feedback after regulatory or political interventions. This is being followed up.

A Review of Asenapine in the Treatment of Bipolar Disorder

Bipolar disorder places a significant burden on the affected individuals, their family, healthcare systems and the overall economy. More treatment options are needed, especially those with better efficacy and tolerability. Asenapine is a second-generation antipsychotic approved in Europe (brand name Sycrest^®) for the treatment of moderate-to-severe manic episodes associated with bipolar I disorder in adults, and in the US (brand name Saphris^®) for the treatment of manic or mixed episodes of bipolar I disorder in adults and children aged 10-17 years. It is the antagonistic activity at the D₂ receptor that is likely responsible for the antimanic properties of asenapine. Clinical trials have demonstrated that asenapine mono- and add-on therapy is effective in the short- and long-term treatment of mania associated with bipolar I disorder in adult and paediatric patients. In addition, post hoc and pooled data analyses have shown that asenapine is effective in reducing clinically significant depressive symptoms in patients with bipolar I disorder. The most common adverse events associated with asenapine are somnolence, dizziness, extrapyramidal symptoms, increased bodyweight and oral hypoesthesia. However, the incidence of these events, particularly weight gain, is generally lower than with olanzapine. In one study, asenapine has been shown to improve health-related quality of life. Economic analyses indicate that the use of asenapine can, over time, lead to a reduction in the costs of treatment.

Experience with developing antibiotic stewardship programs in Serbia: potential model for other Balkan countries?

Aim: Antimicrobial resistance and inappropriate use of antibiotics in children are important issues. Consequently, there is a need to develop comprehensive stewardship programs even in hospitals with limited resources starting with children's hospitals. Methods: Retrospective observational analysis of antimicrobial utilization and resistance patterns over 5 years in a tertiary care children's hospital in Serbia. Results: Cumulative antimicrobial resistance decreased but was still high, with high cumulative resistance rates among the most widely used antibiotics in the hospital. Total antibiotic use decreased from 2010 to 2014 although there was still high prescribing of reserved antibiotics. Conclusion: Concerns with inappropriate use and high resistance rates among some antibiotics used in the hospital are being used to develop guidance on future antibiotic use in this hospital, building on the recently introduced antibiotic stewardship program, as well as encourage other hospitals in Serbia to review their policies.

Polypharmacy among the elderly in the Republic of Srpska: extent and implications for the future

The prescribing of medicines is a fundamental component of care for the elderly; however, there is increasing concern with polypharmacy and its impact on morbidity, mortality and costs. As a result, long-term prescription-medicine use and the prevalence of polypharmacy in the elderly in the Republic of Srpska were analyzed. The findings were subsequently used to suggest potential future measures. A retrospective study of all elderly patients during 2005-2010 stratified by age group (three groups), sex and long-term medicine use was performed. Polypharmacy (five or more medicines) increased from 1.4% of the elderly taking medicines long-term to 3.6% by 2010, with 53.6% of elderly taking two or more medicines long-term. The most prevalent diseases were cardiovascular diseases and diabetes. Most prescriptions were in accordance with recent guidelines; however, there was a concern with appreciable prescribing of digoxin and aminophylline. Whilst polypharmacy rates are low in the Republic, the increasing rate is a concern. Further studies are planned.

The need for cost-effective choices to treat patients with bipolar 1 disorders including asenapine

BACKGROUND

Bipolar 1 disorders (BPD) are a chronic disorder with prevalence rates of up to 2.6% of the adult population or higher and appreciable direct and indirect costs. As a result, these are a concern to health authorities especially given the low age of onset. Consequently, there is a need to treat BPD patients well and improve their quality-of-life. Pharmacotherapy includes mood stabilizers and atypical antipsychotics (AAPs). AAPs have different mechanisms of action and side-effects, so treatment needs to be tailored. Asenapine in clinical trials is as effective as olanzapine, with less metabolic side-effects.

METHODS

Chitnis and colleagues assessed the cost-effectiveness of asenapine among patients in healthcare databases.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

They showed in routine care that asenapine also reduces hospital and emergency room admissions, making it cost neutral in BPD, which is of interest to health authorities and clinicians.