1
|
Moss E, Burrell A, Lee J, Reichenbach D, Mitchell S, Yan S, Thiruvillakkat K. Economic and humanistic burden in kidney transplant rejection: a literature review. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2024; 24:343-352. [PMID: 38284281 DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2024.2305140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2023] [Accepted: 01/10/2024] [Indexed: 01/30/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) is a major cause of late kidney allograft failure, but its economic and humanistic impacts have not been well-characterized in the literature. AREAS COVERED We reviewed available literature on economic burden (costs and healthcare resource use) and humanistic burden (health-related quality of life impacts [HRQOL] and utility estimates) in patients diagnosed with kidney transplant rejection; ABMR-specific studies were of particular interest. In total, 21 publications reporting economic and humanistic burden were included in the review; 9 of these reported ABMR-specific outcomes. The reviewed studies consistently showed a greater burden associated with ABMR-related transplant rejection than with non-ABMR transplant rejection. EXPERT OPINION Evidence suggests greater economic burden and increased HRQOL impairment with ABMR-related kidney transplant rejection relative to non-ABMR, although small sample sizes and missing definitions for ABMR make meaningful comparisons between studies challenging. Because no International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 codes currently describe the etiologies of transplant rejection, it is difficult to characterize the burden of distinct types of transplant rejection. The paucity of high-quality data on the burden of ABMR in kidney transplant rejection demonstrates the need for more etiology-centric ICD-10 codes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Moss
- Health Economics, RTI Health Solutions, Manchester, UK
| | - Anita Burrell
- Founder, Anita Burrell Consulting LLC, Flemington, NJ, USA
| | - James Lee
- CSL Behring LLC, King of Prussia, PA, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
ElChaki R, Ettenger R, Lee S, Chen L, Gales B, Srivastava R, Pearl M. Envarsus XR® pharmacokinetics in adolescents post-kidney transplantation - A pilot study. Pediatr Transplant 2023; 27:e14480. [PMID: 36732080 DOI: 10.1111/petr.14480] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2022] [Revised: 01/08/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Envarsus XR® (LCPT), a once daily dosage formulation of tacrolimus, is an FDA-approved medication in adult renal transplant recipients (RTRs). There are limited data on its pharmacokinetics (PK) in adolescent RTRs. We report here the PK profile of LCPT in adolescent RTRs. METHODS The dose of LCPT was determined using a dose conversion ratio targeting 0.7 relative to the total daily immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-Tac) dose. On day 7 after converting to LCPT, patients had an abbreviated PK assessment with sampling at: 0 h (pre-dose), 8-, and 12-h post-dose. The PK data analysis was performed using Bayesian estimators. Our results were compared to those of published adult PK data for LCPT and pediatric PK data for IR-Tac and extended release tacrolimus (ER-Tac) formulation (Advagraf). RESULTS PK data from three adolescent patients on LCPT were evaluated. The mean (±SD) area under the time-concentration curve (AUC) was 240 (±20.22) h*ng/mL. The mean Tmax was 9.01 ± 2.12 h, and the % fluctuation was 77.71 ± 3.96%. The AUC, Tmax , and % fluctuation were similar to reported results in adult patients taking LCPT. The AUC was higher and the Tmax was longer than what has been reported in pediatric patients taking IR-Tac and ER-Tac. In addition, the LCPT group showed a lower % fluctuation than patients receiving ER-Tac. CONCLUSION The PK evaluation of LCPT in adolescent RTRs showed similar results to adults. Adolescents taking LCPT had a higher AUC, a more attenuated Tmax , and a lower fluctuation than that seen with ER-Tac in pediatrics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rim ElChaki
- Division of Pediatric Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Robert Ettenger
- Division of Pediatric Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Sabrina Lee
- Department of Pharmaceutical Services, Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Lucia Chen
- Department of Medicine Statistics Core, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Barbara Gales
- Division of Pediatric Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Rachana Srivastava
- Division of Pediatric Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Meghan Pearl
- Division of Pediatric Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yaghoubi M, Cressman S, Edwards L, Shechter S, Doyle-Waters MM, Keown P, Sapir-Pichhadze R, Bryan S. A Systematic Review of Kidney Transplantation Decision Modelling Studies. APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY 2023; 21:39-51. [PMID: 35945483 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-022-00744-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/19/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Genome-based precision medicine strategies promise to minimize premature graft loss after renal transplantation, through precision approaches to immune compatibility matching between kidney donors and recipients. The potential adoption of this technology calls for important changes to clinical management processes and allocation policy. Such potential policy change decisions may be supported by decision models from health economics, comparative effectiveness research and operations management. OBJECTIVE We used a systematic approach to identify and extract information about models published in the kidney transplantation literature and provide an overview of the status of our collective model-based knowledge about the kidney transplant process. METHODS Database searches were conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science and other sources, for reviews and primary studies. We reviewed all English-language papers that presented a model that could be a tool to support decision making in kidney transplantation. Data were extracted on the clinical context and modelling methods used. RESULTS A total of 144 studies were included, most of which focused on a single component of the transplantation process, such as immunosuppressive therapy or donor-recipient matching and organ allocation policies. Pre- and post-transplant processes have rarely been modelled together. CONCLUSION A whole-disease modelling approach is preferred to inform precision medicine policy, given its potential upstream implementation in the treatment pathway. This requires consideration of pre- and post-transplant natural history, risk factors for allograft dysfunction and failure, and other post-transplant outcomes. Our call is for greater collaboration across disciplines and whole-disease modelling approaches to more accurately simulate complex policy decisions about the integration of precision medicine tools in kidney transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohsen Yaghoubi
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Mercer University College of Pharmacy, Atlanta, USA
| | - Sonya Cressman
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Louisa Edwards
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Steven Shechter
- Sauder School of Business, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Mary M Doyle-Waters
- Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Paul Keown
- Department of Medicine, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | | | - Stirling Bryan
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, V6T 1Z3, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Łabuś A, Mucha K, Kulesza A, Fliszkiewicz M, Pączek L, Niemczyk M. Costs of Treatment of Acute Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Kidney Transplant Recipients. Transplant Proc 2022; 54:968-971. [PMID: 35277257 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2021.11.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2021] [Accepted: 11/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) remains challenging in kidney transplant recipients. It may negatively impact the graft survival, and its treatment is associated to relatively high expenses. The aim of our study was to assess the costs of treatment of acute AMR in the Polish settings. METHODS A total of 11 kidney transplant recipients with acute AMR diagnosed between September 2016 and August 2019 and treated in our center were included. Direct costs of inpatient and outpatient care in the first year after AMR diagnosis from the perspective of a transplant center were retrospectively calculated. RESULTS The costs of treatment of acute AMR were considerably high, with a mean 1-month cost of treatment 12,718 PLN (∼€2925; ∼3307 US dollars). That means that costs of management of kidney transplant recipients with acute AMR are almost 2-fold higher than hemodialysis. Intravenous immunoglobulin was responsible for the majority (55%) of costs. CONCLUSIONS Treatment of acute AMR increases the costs of post-kidney transplant care in involved patients. Therefore, efforts should be made to minimize the risk for acute AMR. Despite its potential clinical benefits, management of acute AMR is even more expensive than dialysis. Therefore, further cost-effectiveness analyses are needed to justify the spending and to establish the best treatment regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Łabuś
- Department of Immunology, Transplant Medicine and Internal Diseases, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Krzysztof Mucha
- Department of Immunology, Transplant Medicine and Internal Diseases, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Andrzej Kulesza
- Department of Immunology, Transplant Medicine and Internal Diseases, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Magda Fliszkiewicz
- Department of Immunology, Transplant Medicine and Internal Diseases, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Leszek Pączek
- Department of Immunology, Transplant Medicine and Internal Diseases, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Mariusz Niemczyk
- Department of Immunology, Transplant Medicine and Internal Diseases, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Number of Regularly Prescribed Drugs and Intrapatient Tacrolimus Trough Levels Variability in Stable Kidney Transplant Recipients. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9061926. [PMID: 32575525 PMCID: PMC7356830 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9061926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2020] [Revised: 06/17/2020] [Accepted: 06/17/2020] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
High intra-patient variability (IPV) of tacrolimus levels is associated with poor long-term outcome after transplantation. We aimed to evaluate whether the number of regularly prescribed medications is associated with the tacrolimus IPV. We have studied 152 kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) with mean post-transplant time of 6.0 ± 3.1 years. The coefficient of variation (CV) as a measure of IPV was calculated in each individual patient. Data concerning the type and number of currently prescribed medications were collected. The participants were divided into four groups, based on the number of regularly prescribed drugs (≤3, 4-6, 7-9, ≥10 drugs, respectively). There was an increasing trend for median CV, proportional to the increasing number of medications [group 1: 0.11 (interquartile range, 0.08-0.14), group 2: 0.14 (0.01-0.17), group 3: 0.17 (0.14-0.23), group 4: 0.17 (0.15-0.30); p value for trend = 0.001]. Stepwise backward multivariate regression analysis revealed that the number of medications [partial correlation coefficient (rpartial) = 0.503, p < 0.001] independently influenced the tacrolimus IPV. Concomitant steroid or diuretics use increased IPV only in Advagraf-treated KTRs, whereas proton-pump inhibitor or statin use increased IPV in the Prograf group but not in the Advagraf group. A large number of concomitant medications significantly increases the tacrolimus IPV in stable KTRs.
Collapse
|
6
|
Ho B, Bhagat H, Schwartz JJ, Atiemo K, Daud A, Kang R, Montag SE, Zhao L, Lee E, Skaro AI, Ladner DP. Real-World Study of Once-Daily, Extended-Release Tacrolimus Versus Twice-Daily, Immediate-Release Tacrolimus in Kidney Transplantation: Clinical Outcomes and Healthcare Resource Utilization. Adv Ther 2019; 36:1465-1479. [PMID: 30941724 PMCID: PMC6824361 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-019-00904-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Real-world data with extended-release tacrolimus (ER-T) are lacking in the USA. This study examined clinical outcomes and healthcare resource utilization in kidney transplant patients receiving ER-T in clinical practice. METHODS This was a retrospective, single-center analysis (February-June 2016) using data from Northwestern University's Enterprise Data Warehouse. Adult patients receiving a kidney transplant in the preceding 4 years, treated de novo or converted to ER-T from immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-T) within 10 days post-transplantation, and maintained on ER-T (at least 3 months) were included. Patients were matched for demographic and clinical characteristics with IR-T-treated control patients. Endpoints included clinical outcomes and healthcare resource utilization up to 1 year post-transplantation. RESULTS A total of 19 ER-T-treated patients were matched with 55 IR-T-treated patients. No ER-T-treated patients experienced biopsy-confirmed acute rejection (BCAR) or graft failure versus 3 (5.5%) and 3 (5.5%) IR-T-treated patients, respectively. Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), the number of all-cause outpatient visits, readmissions, and all-cause hospitalization days were comparable between groups. Tacrolimus trough levels, days to target level (6-10 ng/mL), and number of required dose adjustments were also similar. CONCLUSION Real-world clinical outcomes and healthcare resource utilization were similar with ER-T and IR-T. Larger studies will need to investigate the trend toward fewer BCAR events, and increased graft survival with ER-T. FUNDING Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc. Plain language summary available for this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bing Ho
- Northwestern University Transplant Outcomes Research Collaborative (NUTORC), Comprehensive Transplant Center, Northwestern University, 676 N. St. Clair Street, 19th Floor, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
| | - Hardik Bhagat
- Medical Affairs, Americas, Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc., 1 Astellas Way, Northbrook, IL, 60062, USA
| | - Jason J Schwartz
- Medical Affairs, Americas, Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc., 1 Astellas Way, Northbrook, IL, 60062, USA
| | - Kofi Atiemo
- Northwestern University Transplant Outcomes Research Collaborative (NUTORC), Comprehensive Transplant Center, Northwestern University, 676 N. St. Clair Street, 19th Floor, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
| | - Amna Daud
- Northwestern University Transplant Outcomes Research Collaborative (NUTORC), Comprehensive Transplant Center, Northwestern University, 676 N. St. Clair Street, 19th Floor, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
| | - Raymond Kang
- Northwestern University Transplant Outcomes Research Collaborative (NUTORC), Comprehensive Transplant Center, Northwestern University, 676 N. St. Clair Street, 19th Floor, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
| | - Samantha E Montag
- Northwestern University Transplant Outcomes Research Collaborative (NUTORC), Comprehensive Transplant Center, Northwestern University, 676 N. St. Clair Street, 19th Floor, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University, 680 N. Lake Shore Drive, Suite 1400, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
| | - Lihui Zhao
- Northwestern University Transplant Outcomes Research Collaborative (NUTORC), Comprehensive Transplant Center, Northwestern University, 676 N. St. Clair Street, 19th Floor, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University, 680 N. Lake Shore Drive, Suite 1400, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
| | - Edward Lee
- Medical Affairs, Americas, Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc., 1 Astellas Way, Northbrook, IL, 60062, USA
| | - Anton I Skaro
- Department of Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, St. Joseph's Hospital, 268 Grosvenor Street, Rm. E3-117, London, ON, N6A 4V2, Canada
| | - Daniela P Ladner
- Northwestern University Transplant Outcomes Research Collaborative (NUTORC), Comprehensive Transplant Center, Northwestern University, 676 N. St. Clair Street, 19th Floor, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gisslinger H, Buxhofer-Ausch V, Hodisch J, Radinoff A, Karyagina E, Kyrcz-Krzemień S, Abdulkadyrov K, Gerbutavicius R, Melikyan A, Burgstaller S, Hus M, Kłoczko J, Yablokova V, Tzvetkov N, Całbecka M, Shneyder T, Warzocha K, Jurgutis M, Kaplanov K, Jilma B, Schoergenhofer C, Klade C. A phase III randomized, multicentre, double blind, active controlled trial to compare the efficacy and safety of two different anagrelide formulations in patients with essential thrombocythaemia - the TEAM-ET 2·0 trial. Br J Haematol 2019; 185:691-700. [PMID: 30919941 PMCID: PMC6594023 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.15824] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2018] [Accepted: 12/18/2018] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
Anagrelide is an established treatment option for essential thrombocythaemia (ET). A prolonged release formulation was developed with the aim of reducing dosing frequency and improving tolerability, without diminishing efficacy. This multicentre, randomized, double blind, active‐controlled, non‐inferiority trial investigated the efficacy, safety and tolerability of anagrelide prolonged release (A‐PR) over a reference product in high‐risk ET patients, either anagrelide‐naïve or ‐experienced. In a 6 to 12‐week titration period the individual dose for the consecutive 4‐week maintenance period was identified. The primary endpoint was the mean platelet count during the maintenance period (3 consecutive measurements, day 0, 14, 28). Of 112 included patients 106 were randomized. The mean screening platelet counts were 822 × 109/l (95% confidence interval (CI) 707–936 × 109/l) and 797 × 109/l (95% CI 708–883 × 109/l) for A‐PR and the reference product, respectively. Both treatments effectively reduced platelet counts, to mean 281 × 109/l for A‐PR (95% CI 254–311) and 305 × 109/l (95% CI 276–337) for the reference product (P < 0·0001, for non‐inferiority). Safety and tolerability were comparable between both drugs. The novel prolonged‐release formulation was equally effective and well tolerated compared to the reference product. A‐PR provides a more convenient dosing schedule and will offer an alternative to licensed immediate‐release anagrelide formulations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heinz Gisslinger
- Department of Haematology and Blood Coagulation, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | | | - Atanas Radinoff
- Clinic of Oncology and Haematology, Tokuda Hospital Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | | | - Slawomira Kyrcz-Krzemień
- Samodzielny Publiczny Szpital Kliniczny im, Andrzeja Mielęckiego Śląskiego Uniwersytetu Medycznego w Katowicach, Katowice, Poland
| | - Kudrat Abdulkadyrov
- Russian Scientific-Research Institute for Haematology and Transfusiology, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
| | | | | | - Sonja Burgstaller
- Abteilung für Innere Medizin IV, Klinikum Wels-Grieskirchen, Wels, Austria
| | - Marek Hus
- Klinika Hematoonkologii i Transplantacji Szpiku, Lublin, Poland
| | - Janusz Kłoczko
- Klinika Hematologii z Pododziałem Chorób Naczyń, Uniwersytecki Szpital Kliniczny w Białymstoku, Białystok, Poland
| | - Vera Yablokova
- Yaroslavl Regional Clinical Hospital, Yaroslavl, Russian Federation
| | - Nikolay Tzvetkov
- MHAT Dr. Georgi Stranski, Clinic of Haematology, Pleven, Bulgaria
| | - Malgorzata Całbecka
- Oddział Hematologii, Specjalistyczny Szpital Miejski im. M. Kopernika w Toruniu, Torun, Poland
| | - Tatyana Shneyder
- Leningrad Regional Clinical Hospital, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
| | | | | | - Kamil Kaplanov
- Volgograd Regional Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Volgograd, Russian Federation
| | - Bernd Jilma
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Muduma G, Odeyemi I, Smith-Palmer J, Pollock RF. Review of the Clinical and Economic Burden of Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Renal Transplant Recipients. Adv Ther 2016; 33:345-56. [PMID: 26905265 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-016-0292-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2015] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Antibody-mediated rejection (AbMR) is a leading cause of late graft loss in kidney transplant recipients, accounting for up to 60% of late graft failures. AbMR manifests as two distinct phenotypes: the first occurs in the immediate post-transplant period in sensitized patients; the second occurs in the late post-transplant period and has been associated with non-adherence to immunosuppression. The present review summarizes the current treatment options for AbMR, its clinical and economic burden, and approaches for reducing the risk of AbMR. While AbMR is typically refractory to treatment with corticosteroids, there are numerous other approaches focused on removal, inhibition or neutralization of donor-specific antibodies, or inhibition of complement-mediated allograft damage. AbMR treatment is generally expensive with one US study reporting costs of USD 49,000-155,000 per episode. However, leaving AbMR untreated puts patients at high risk of capillaritis, microangiopathy, necrosis and graft failure, which may ultimately result in much greater costs associated with a return to dialysis. Given the barriers to treatment, which include the high cost and the fact that pharmacologic treatments are currently used off-label, prevention of AbMR is important, with improvement in patient adherence to immunosuppression a key strategic approach that may be worthy of further evaluation. FUNDING Astellas Pharma EMEA Limited.
Collapse
|