1
|
Munari SC, Wilkinson AL, Asselin J, Owen L, Read P, Finlayson R, Martin S, Bell C, O'Connor CC, Carter A, Guy R, McNulty A, Varma R, Chow EPF, Fairley CK, Donovan B, Stoove M, Goller JL, Hocking J, Hellard ME. Chlamydia retesting remains low among young women in Australia: an observational study using sentinel surveillance data, 2018-2022. Sex Health 2024; 21:SH23178. [PMID: 38369757 DOI: 10.1071/sh23178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2024] [Indexed: 02/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chlamydia remains the most notified bacterial sexually transmissible infection in Australia with guidelines recommending testing for re-infection at 3months post treatment. This paper aimed to determine chlamydia retesting and repeat positivity rates within 2-4months among young women in Australia, and to evaluate what factors increase or decrease the likelihood of retesting. METHODS Chlamydia retesting rates among 16-29-year-old women were analysed from Australian Collaboration for Coordinated Enhanced Sentinel Surveillance of sexually transmissible infection and bloodborne virus (ACCESS) sentinel surveillance data (n =62 sites). Among women with at least one positive test between 1 January 2018 and 31 August 2022, retesting counts and proportions within 2-4months were calculated. Logistic regression was performed to assess factors associated with retesting within 2-4months. RESULTS Among 8758 women who were positive before 31 August 2022 to allow time for follow up, 1423 (16.2%) were retested within 2-4months, of whom 179 (12.6%) tested positive. The odds of retesting within 2-4months were 25% lower if tested in a coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-9) pandemic year (2020-2022) (aOR=0.75; 95% CI 0.59-0.95). Among 9140 women with a positive test before 30 November 2022, 397 (4.3%) were retested too early (within 7days to 1month) and 81 (20.4%) of those were positive. CONCLUSIONS Chlamydia retesting rates remain low with around a sixth of women retested within 2-4months in line with guidelines. Re-infection is common with around one in eight retesting positive. An increase in retesting is required to reduce the risk of reproductive complications and onward transmission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie C Munari
- Disease Elimination Program, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Vic., Australia; and Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Anna L Wilkinson
- Disease Elimination Program, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Vic., Australia; and Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia; and School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Jason Asselin
- Disease Elimination Program, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Louise Owen
- Statewide Sexual Health Service, Tas and UTAS School of Medicine, Hobart, Tas., Australia
| | - Phillip Read
- South Eastern Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Sarah Martin
- Canberra Sexual Health Centre, Canberra, ACT, Australia; and Australian National University, School of Medicine and Psychology, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - Charlotte Bell
- Communicable Disease Control Branch, Department of Health South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia; and Adelaide Sexual Health Centre and Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Catherine C O'Connor
- The Kirby Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Allison Carter
- The Kirby Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; and Australian Human Rights Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; and Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada
| | - Rebecca Guy
- The Kirby Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Anna McNulty
- Sydney Sexual Health Centre, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Rick Varma
- Sydney Sexual Health Centre, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Eric P F Chow
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia; and Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Vic., Australia; and Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Christopher K Fairley
- Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Vic., Australia; and Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Basil Donovan
- The Kirby Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Mark Stoove
- Disease Elimination Program, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Jane L Goller
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Jane Hocking
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Margaret E Hellard
- Disease Elimination Program, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Vic., Australia; and Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia; and Department of Infectious Diseases, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hocking JS, Geisler WM, Kong FYS. Update on the Epidemiology, Screening, and Management of Chlamydia trachomatis Infection. Infect Dis Clin North Am 2023; 37:267-288. [PMID: 37005162 DOI: 10.1016/j.idc.2023.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/03/2023]
Abstract
Chlamydia trachomatis infection ("chlamydia") is the most commonly diagnosed bacterial sexually transmitted infection globally, occurring in the genitals (urethra or vagina/cervix), rectum, or pharynx. If left untreated in women, genital chlamydia can ascend into the upper genital tract causing pelvic inflammatory disease, increasing their risk for ectopic pregnancy, infertility, and chronic pelvic pain. In men, chlamydia can cause epididymitis and proctitis. However, chlamydia is asymptomatic in over 80% of cases. This article provides an update on the epidemiology, natural history, and clinical manifestations of chlamydia in adults and discusses the current approaches to its management and control policy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane S Hocking
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, 3/207 Bouverie Street, Carlton South, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia 3053.
| | - William M Geisler
- Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 703 19th Street South, ZRB 242, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
| | - Fabian Y S Kong
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, 3/207 Bouverie Street, Carlton South, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia 3053
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Goller JL, Coombe J, Temple-Smith M, Bittleston H, Sanci L, Guy R, Fairley C, Regan D, Carvalho N, Simpson J, Donovan B, Tomnay J, Chen MY, Estcourt C, Roeske L, Hawkes D, Saville M, Hocking JS. Management of Chlamydia Cases in Australia (MoCCA): protocol for a non-randomised implementation and feasibility trial. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e067488. [PMID: 36600435 PMCID: PMC9772683 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The sexually transmitted infection chlamydia can cause significant complications, particularly among people with female reproductive organs. Optimal management includes timely and appropriate treatment, notifying and treating sexual partners, timely retesting for reinfection and detecting complications including pelvic inflammatory disease (PID). In Australia, mainstream primary care (general practice) is where most chlamydia infections are diagnosed, making it a key setting for optimising chlamydia management. High reinfection and low retesting rates suggest partner notification and retesting are not uniformly provided. The Management of Chlamydia Cases in Australia (MoCCA) study seeks to address gaps in chlamydia management in Australian general practice through implementing interventions shown to improve chlamydia management in specialist services. MoCCA will focus on improving retesting, partner management (including patient-delivered partner therapy) and PID diagnosis. METHODS AND ANALYSIS MoCCA is a non-randomised implementation and feasibility trial aiming to determine how best to implement interventions to support general practice in delivering best practice chlamydia management. Our method is guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and the Normalisation Process Theory. MoCCA interventions include a website, flow charts, fact sheets, mailed specimen kits and autofills to streamline chlamydia consultation documentation. We aim to recruit 20 general practices across three Australian states (Victoria, New South Wales, Queensland) through which we will implement the interventions over 12-18 months. Mixed methods involving qualitative and quantitative data collection and analyses (observation, interviews, surveys) from staff and patients will be undertaken to explore our intervention implementation, acceptability and uptake. Deidentified general practice and laboratory data will be used to measure pre-post chlamydia testing, retesting, reinfection and PID rates, and to estimate MoCCA intervention costs. Our findings will guide scale-up plans for Australian general practice. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethics approval was obtained from The University of Melbourne Human Research Ethics Committee (Ethics ID: 22665). Findings will be disseminated via conference presentations, peer-reviewed publications and study reports.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane L Goller
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jacqueline Coombe
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Meredith Temple-Smith
- Department of General Practice, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Helen Bittleston
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lena Sanci
- Department of General Practice, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Rebecca Guy
- Sexual Health Program, The Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Christopher Fairley
- Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - David Regan
- The Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Natalie Carvalho
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Julie Simpson
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Basil Donovan
- The Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Sydney Sexual Health Centre, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jane Tomnay
- Centre for Excellence in Rural Sexual Health, Department of Rural Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Marcus Y Chen
- Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Claudia Estcourt
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Lara Roeske
- Royal Australian College of General Practitioners, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - David Hawkes
- VCS Pathology, Australian Centre for the Prevention of Cervical Cancer, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Marion Saville
- Australian Centre for the Prevention of Cervical Cancer, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jane S Hocking
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Clinical Efficacy Analysis of Fast Rehabilitation Nursing on Pain Mitigation after Lumbar Discectomy and Bone Graft Fusion and Internal Fixation. EVIDENCE-BASED COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE 2022; 2022:3665919. [PMID: 35855830 PMCID: PMC9288289 DOI: 10.1155/2022/3665919] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2022] [Revised: 05/17/2022] [Accepted: 06/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Objective To investigate clinical efficacy analysis of fast rehabilitation nursing on pain mitigation after lumbar discectomy and bone graft fusion and internal fixation. Methods A total of 60 patients with lumbar disc herniation who underwent lumbar discectomy and bone graft fusion and internal fixation in our hospital from January 2021 to December 2021 were randomized either into routine group (n = 30) or rehabilitation group (n = 30) via the random number table method. The patients in the routine group were intervened with the routine postoperative nursing mode, and the patients in the rehabilitation group were intervened with the fast rehabilitation nursing mode on the basis of the nursing of the patients in the routine group. The rehabilitation effect, self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) and self-rating depression scale (SDS) scores, postoperative pain improvement, and nursing satisfaction were compared between the two groups. Results The postoperative rehabilitation effect of the rehabilitation group was significantly better than that of the routine group (P < 0.05). The fast rehabilitation nursing resulted in a notably lower postoperative SAS and SDS scores versus the routine nursing (P < 0.001). The postoperative pain was significantly mitigated in the rehabilitation group when compared with the routine group (P < 0.001). The fast rehabilitation nursing implemented in the rehabilitation group led to a remarkably higher nursing satisfaction of the patients (P < 0.001). Conclusion The fast rehabilitation nursing mode intervention for lumbar disc herniation patients undergoing lumbar discectomy and bone graft fusion and internal fixation is a promising approach to improve the postoperative rehabilitation, mitigate postoperative pain, and relieve anxiety, depression, and other negative emotions, with higher clinical nursing satisfaction.
Collapse
|
5
|
Dukers-Muijrers NHTM, Evers YJ, Hoebe CJPA, Wolffs PFG, de Vries HJC, Hoenderboom B, van der Sande MAB, Heijne J, Klausner JD, Hocking JS, van Bergen J. Controversies and evidence on Chlamydia testing and treatment in asymptomatic women and men who have sex with men: a narrative review. BMC Infect Dis 2022; 22:255. [PMID: 35287617 PMCID: PMC8922931 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-022-07171-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2021] [Accepted: 02/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) is the most common bacterial sexually transmitted infection (STI) worldwide. CT is mainly asymptomatic. Test-and-treat strategies are widely implemented to prevent transmission and complications. Strategies are not without controversy in asymptomatic women and men who have sex with men (MSM). Concerns are emerging to test and treat asymptomatic persons for urogenital CT (‘Controversy 1’) and pharyngeal or rectal CT (‘Controversy 2’), whereby testing symptomatic persons is not under debate. Opposed views in CT treatment involve using azithromycin versus doxycycline (‘Controversy 3’). The objective of this review is to provide coverage of these public health and clinical controversies by reviewing the current scientific evidence. Methods A literature search was performed using PubMed for relevant publications between 2018 and September 2021, and iterative retrieval of additional relevant publications. Results Controversy 1. In women, the majority of asymptomatic CT are at the urogenital site, and detections mostly include viable CT. CT easily transmits to a partner and potentially also between the vaginal and rectal areas; the clinical impact of urogenital CT is established, although risks for adverse outcomes are uncertain. Wide-scale testing in asymptomatic women has not resulted in reduced prevalence. In MSM, evidence for the clinical impact of asymptomatic urogenital CT is lacking. Controversy 2. Rectal CT is common in women diagnosed with urogenital CT, but the clinical impact of asymptomatic rectal CT is uncertain. In MSM, rectal CT is common, and most CT infections are at the rectal site, yet the risk of longer term complications is unknown. In both sexes, pharyngeal CT is uncommon and has no documented clinical impact. Controversy 3. In the treatment of rectal CT, doxycycline has superior effectiveness to azithromycin. Evidence has also accumulated on the harms of test-and-treat strategies. Conclusions Current practices vary widely, from widescale test-and-treat approaches to more individual patient- and partner-level case management. Choosing which asymptomatic people to test at what anatomic site, and whether to test or not, requires an urgent (re-)definition of the goals of testing and treating asymptomatic persons. Treatment guidelines are shifting toward universal doxycycline use, and clinical practice now faces the challenge of implementation. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-022-07171-2. Test-and-treat is a key strategy in the control of Chlamydia trachomatis (CT). We discuss recent controversies and present scientific evidence regarding urogenital, rectal, and pharyngeal CT test-and-treat strategies in women and in men who have sex with men (MSM). This should inform best practices for the prevention and management of the most common bacterial sexually transmitted infection (STI) worldwide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole H T M Dukers-Muijrers
- Department of Sexual Health, Infectious Diseases, and Environmental Health, South Limburg Public Health Service, PO Box 33, 6400 AA, Heerlen, The Netherlands. .,Department of Health Promotion, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Ymke J Evers
- Department of Sexual Health, Infectious Diseases, and Environmental Health, South Limburg Public Health Service, PO Box 33, 6400 AA, Heerlen, The Netherlands.,Department of Social Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Christian J P A Hoebe
- Department of Sexual Health, Infectious Diseases, and Environmental Health, South Limburg Public Health Service, PO Box 33, 6400 AA, Heerlen, The Netherlands.,Department of Social Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Medical Microbiology, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Petra F G Wolffs
- Department of Medical Microbiology, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Henry J C de Vries
- Epidemiology and Surveillance Unit, Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.,Department of Infectious Diseases, Public Health Service of Amsterdam (GGD Amsterdam), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Dermatology, Amsterdam Infection & Immunity Institute (AII), Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bernice Hoenderboom
- Epidemiology and Surveillance Unit, Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.,Institute for Public Health Genomics, Genetics & Cell Biology, Maastricht University, Faculty of Health and Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Marianne A B van der Sande
- Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.,Global Health, Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Janneke Heijne
- Epidemiology and Surveillance Unit, Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | - Jeffrey D Klausner
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Jane S Hocking
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jan van Bergen
- Epidemiology and Surveillance Unit, Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.,Department of General Practice, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,STI AIDS Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Greydanus DE, Cabral MD, Patel DR. Pelvic inflammatory disease in the adolescent and young adult: An update. Dis Mon 2021; 68:101287. [PMID: 34521505 DOI: 10.1016/j.disamonth.2021.101287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) is an infection of the female upper genital tract that is typically polymicrobial with classic core involvement of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and/or Chlamydia trachomatis, though other endogenous flora from the vagino-cervical areas can be involved as well. It is often a sexually transmitted disease but other etiologic routes are also noted. A variety of risk factors have been identified including adolescence, young adulthood, adolescent cervical ectropion, multiple sexual partners, immature immune system, history of previous PID, risky contraceptive practices and others. An early diagnosis and prompt treatment are necessary to reduce risks of PID complications such as chronic pelvic pain, ectopic pregnancy and infertility. Current management principles of PID are also reviewed. It is important for clinicians to screen sexually active females for common sexually transmitted infections such as Chlamydia trachomatis and provide safer sex education to their adolescent and young adult patients. Clinicians should provide comprehensive management to persons with PID and utilize established guidelines such as those from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donald E Greydanus
- Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Western Michigan University, Homer Stryker M.D. School of Medicine, 1000 Oakland Drive, Kalamazoo, Michigan, 49008, United States of America.
| | - Maria Demma Cabral
- Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Western Michigan University, Homer Stryker M.D. School of Medicine, 1000 Oakland Drive, Kalamazoo, Michigan, 49008, United States of America.
| | - Dilip R Patel
- Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Western Michigan University, Homer Stryker M.D. School of Medicine, 1000 Oakland Drive, Kalamazoo, Michigan, 49008, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|