A comparison of radiation exposure with the conventional versus mini C arm in orthopedic extremity surgery

Prospective observational analysis of intraoperative radiation exposure with a mini C-arm intensifier in percutaneous forefoot surgery

INTRODUCTION

Percutaneous forefoot surgery has been associated with higher radiation exposure than the conventional approach. However, there is little data on forefoot surgery using a mini C-arm intensifier. We, therefore, conducted a prospective study to (1) evaluate the intraoperative radiation received by the surgeon during percutaneous forefoot surgery with a mini C-arm; (2) compare the radiation received by the surgeon with the guidelines for occupational exposure issued by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) (20 millisieverts per year [mSv/year] for the whole body, 500mSv/year for the hands, and 20mSv/year for the lens of the eye); and (3) compare the radiation received during percutaneous forefoot surgery with that of the open approach, which has already been reported in the literature.

HYPOTHESIS

The radiation received by the surgeon during percutaneous forefoot surgery with a mini C-arm is lower than the ICRP guidelines, and the findings reported in the literature.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective single-center study was conducted from September 2020 to May 2021. A total of 639 feet (i.e., 435 patients) were included. Of these 639 feet, 336 (52%) were hallux valgus repairs, 49 (8%) were stand-alone procedures of the lateral rays, and 124 (19%) were a combination of both. The radiation dose data was retrieved from the mini C-arm daily: dose-area product (DAP) in centigray per square centimeter (cGy/cm2) and radiation exposure duration in seconds. The doses received by the surgeon were collected every month by 4 passive dosimeters (hand, eye lens, and chest [on and under the lead apron]) and 2 active dosimeters (on and under the lead apron).

RESULTS

The DAP emitted by the mini C-arm during an operating day was 0.10±0.01cGy/cm2 (range, 0.0-3.9), and the mean daily radiation duration was 34.7±19.3seconds (range, 0.7-226.8). There was a mean of 8±8 (range, 1-18) elective procedures per operating day. The daily reading on the active dosimeter worn on the lead apron was 0.002±0 microSv (range, 0-0.04), while the one worn under the apron was 0.001±0 microSv (range, 0-0.03). The equivalent doses over the 7-month study period for the hand, eye lens, and chest (over and under the apron) were 0.14mSv, 0mSv, 0.22mSv, and 0mSv, respectively.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

The radiation exposure in percutaneous forefoot surgery with a mini C-arm intensifier observed in our study was lower than the ICRP recommendations and literature findings during open surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV; prospective study without a control group.

Preliminary Report of a Hybrid Total Ankle Arthroplasty Combining a Stemmed Intramedullary Tibial Component With Chamfer-Cut Talar Dome

Total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) is a viable treatment for end-stage ankle arthritis. In our experience, a stemmed intramedullary tibial component combined with a chamfer-cut talar component provides the most stable construct for TAA. We present our technique for placement of this hybrid prosthesis utilizing the INBONE tibial component in combination with the INFINITY talar component. This technique differs from the standard protocol by minimizing use of both patient-specific and standard intraoperative guides. The primary aim of this study is to report our preliminary outcomes with our novel technique. Secondarily, we aim to demonstrate that placement of this hybrid prosthesis is radiographically reproducible and accurate. The first 10 patients undergoing this technique with at least 1 year of follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. Average visual analog pain scale decreased from 7.4 preoperatively to 0.5 at 1 year postoperatively. The average time to weightbearing was 6.4 weeks. Complications were minimal, and no implant-related complications were encountered. First weightbearing ankle radiographs postoperatively were evaluated by 3 reviewers to determine accuracy of the tibial intramedullary stem in relation to the anatomical axis of the tibia. We found that the deviation of the tibial implant from the anatomic axis was on average 0.9°± 0.5° in the coronal plane, and 2.2°± 2.7° in the sagittal plane. Inter-rater reliability was 83%. We conclude that this hybrid technique utilizing a stemmed intramedullary tibial component in combination with a chamfer-cut talar component for TAA is reproducible, accurate, and safe.

Gonad irradiation from fluoroscopy during upper limb orthopaedic procedures in a UK District General Hospital

OBJECTIVES

To perform a dose assessment of radiation received to the surgeon's gonads when performing upper limb fluoroscopy-guided procedures when the C-arm may be positioned in between the surgeon's legs.

METHODS

A calibrated MDH-Radcal 2025 electrometer was used to read the radiation dose for a single exposure and a 5-s screening radiograph with the C-arm firing up and down. These were performed with and without a lead gown positioned over the ionisation chamber where it would ordinarily lie over gonads during surgery.

RESULTS

With the tube firing down and lead apron in place the single exposure (SE) recorded<0.01 uSv and screening exposure (SC) recorded 0.01 uSv. With the tube firing up, with lead the SE recorded 0.09 uSv and the SC 0.54 uSv. In the same situation without lead, the recordings were 0.13 uSv SE and 0. 65 uSv SC.

CONCLUSIONS

With the X-ray tube firing up, there is a measurable radiation dose to the area where the surgeons' gonads lie. The standard lead apron does not provide shielding of the gonads for a surgeon sitting down performing the operation with the tube firing up since the principal source of the radiation is below the edge of the apron and thus scatters up into the unprotected groin.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Fluoroscopy with conventional C-arm in upper limb procedures can cause scatter irradiation to gonads. The X-ray beam should always be fired from top to bottom otherwise large doses can be emitted and the lead gown is less protective.

Prospective analysis of intraoperative radiation dose in foot and ankle surgery using mini-C-arm fluoroscopy. Continuous series of 1064 procedures

INTRODUCTION

Foot and ankle surgeons make daily use of mini-C-arm fluoroscopes. The present study aimed to quantify associated radiation doses.

HYPOTHESIS

X-ray exposure for foot and ankle surgeons using a mini-C-arm fluoroscope is below the nuclear safety authority authorized doses of 20 mSv/year for the whole body and crystalline lens, 150 mSv/year for the thyroid and 500 mSv/year for the skin and limbs.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A single-center, single-surgeon prospective series was treated between February 2014 and December 2017. Doses emitted by the mini-C-arm (15cm field) were recorded during 1,064 operations. Doses received by the surgeon were recorded by 3 passive dosimeters (thorax, eyes and hands) and 1 active dosimeter. The significance threshold was set at p<0.05.

RESULTS

A total of 64.4% of procedures concerned the forefoot, 35.3% the hindfoot and ankle, and 0.3% were strictly percutaneous. Mean dose-area product (DAP) per procedure was 3.9 cGy/cm²±7: in forefoot surgery, 1.1 cGy/cm²±0.9, and in hindfoot and ankle surgery 8.7 cGy/cm²±9.7 (p<0.05), for mean irradiation times of 7.6s±5.3 and 36.7s±35.5 respectively and image numbers 4.1±2.7 and 18.7±20.5. Total ankle replacement was associated with the highest doses: 20.1 cGy/cm²±14.7. Mean daily active dosimetry was 2.2μSv±1.4. Mean annual dose to the hand, crystalline lens and deep (Hp(10)) and shallow (Hp(0.07)) whole body was respectively 1.28 mSv, 0.6 mSv, 0.31 mSv and 0.19 mSv. The highest annual exposure was recorded for the hands: 2.68 mSv in 2015. There was a significant linear relationship between daily active dosimetry and daily emission: daily active dosimetry=(DAP×0.11)+0.54, for a correlation coefficient of 0.77.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

The exposure of foot and ankle surgeons using mini-C-arms was well below threshold, and also lower than in the literature.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

ESTIMATED EXPOSURE OF SPINE SURGEONS TO RADIATION

ABSTRACT Objective To estimate the amount of radiation received and accumulated in the bodies of two surgeons, one being the responsible surgeon and the other the assistant, performing spine surgery procedures over a period of 25 years. Methods Seventy-two spinal surgeries were performed during a seven-month period and the radiation loads were measured in both surgeons. The measurement of radiation was captured in fluoroscopy in anteroposterior and lateral incidences. The surgeon and the assistant used two dosimeters, one in the cervical region protecting the thyroid and the other on the lead apron in the genital region. The radioactive loads were measured in millisieverts and the accumulated charges were recorded monthly in both regions of the body in the two surgeons for seven months and the means for the work periods (1, 5, 10, 15, 20 and 25 years) were estimated. Results It was observed that in the surgeon the average accumulated radiation loads were 131.9% and 176.92% higher than those of the assistant in the cervical and genital regions, respectively. Conclusion While the use of X-rays is indispensable in routine orthopedic surgery, we have to consider the development of techniques of protection, rigor and discipline in the use of safety materials for surgeons. Preventive exposure reduction measures such as using thyroid protection equipment and turning the head away from the patient during fluoroscopy, among others, should be mandatory to promote less radiation exposure. Level of evidence II; Comparative prospective study.

The use of ionising radiation in orthopaedic surgery: principles, regulations and managing risk to surgeons and patients

The use of ionising radiation for plain film radiography and computerised tomography is fundamental in both diagnostics and treatment for orthopaedics. However, radiation is not without risk as high exposure can increase the risk of cancer. Little time is spent educating doctors about the relative risks of radiation, both to patients and themselves. In addition, there are common misunderstandings about the best ways to mitigate such risk. We aim to provide an overview of the fundamental principles of the use of ionising radiation and its risks within the context of orthopaedic surgery. While providing a narrative review of the current literature, we discuss the basic physics, standards of good practice and relevant UK and European regulations. We discuss the risks to patients and surgeons and suggest ways that these can be mitigated in the operating theatre. A thorough understanding of the risks, and appropriate procedural rules, with respect to the use of ionising radiation is essential for those in orthopaedic practice.

Shielding effect of radiation dose reduction fiber during the use of C-arm fluoroscopy: a phantom study

This study evaluated the shielding effect of a newly developed dose-reduction fiber (DRF) made from barium sulfate, in terms of radiation doses delivered to patients' radiosensitive organs and operator during C-arm fluoroscopy and its impact on the quality of images. A C-arm fluoroscopy unit was placed beside a whole-body phantom. Radiophotoluminescent glass dosimeters were attached to the back and front of the whole-body phantom at 20 cm intervals. Radiation doses were measured without DRF and with it applied to the back (position 1), front (position 2) or both sides (position 3) of the phantom. To investigate the impact of DRF on the quality of fluoroscopic images, step-wedge and modulation transfer function phantoms were used. The absorbed radiation doses to the back of the phantom significantly decreased by 25.3-88.8% after applying DRF to positions 1 and 3. The absorbed radiation doses to the front of the phantom significantly decreased by 55.3-93.6% after applying DRF to positions 2 and 3. The contrast resolution values for each adjacent step area fell in the range 0.0119-0.0209, 0.0128-0.0271, 0.0135-0.0339 and 0.0152-0.0339 without and with DRF applied to positions 1, 2 and 3, respectively. The investigated DRF effectively reduces absorbed radiation doses to patients and operators without decreasing the quality of C-arm fluoroscopic images. Therefore, routine clinical use of the DRF is recommended during the use of C-arm fluoroscopy.

Minimally Invasive Advances: Lesser Toes Deformities

Minimally invasive procedures to treat lesser toes deformities are among the main surgeries of percutaneous techniques and considered mature techniques due to technical versatility and high correction potential, with low rates of complications. Although they seem technically simple procedures, there are important technical details for each of them to obtain a reliable correction. To achieve success in lesser toes percutaneous treatment, it is imperative to follow minimally invasive basic principles, especially postoperative care with specific bandages for unfixed osteotomies. Practical training is mandatory before starting the experience; the foot surgeon must learn theoretic and practical aspects to master this surgery.

A Comparison of Image Quality and Radiation Exposure Between the Mini C-Arm and the Standard C-Arm

Background: The use of intraoperative fluoroscopy has become mandatory in osseous hand surgery. Due to its overall practicality, the mini C-arm has gained popularity among hand surgeons over the standard C-arm. This study compares image quality and radiation exposure for patient and staff between the mini C-arm and the standard C-arm, both with flat panel technology. Methods: An observer-based subjective image quality study was performed using a contrast detail (CD) phantom. Five independent observers were asked to determine the smallest circles discernable to them. The results were plotted in a graph, forming a CD curve. From each curve, an image quality figure (IQF) was derived. A lower IQF equates to a better image quality. The patients' entrance skin dose was measured, and to obtain more information about the staff exposure dose, a perspex hand phantom was used. The scatter radiation was measured at various distances and angles relative to a central point on the detector. Results: The IQF was significantly lower for the mini C-arm resulting in a better image quality. The patients' entrance dose was 10 times higher for the mini C-arm as compared with the standard C-arm, and the scatter radiation threefold. Conclusions: Due to its improved image quality and overall practicality, the mini C-arm is recommended for hand surgical procedures. To ensure that the surgeons' radiation exposure is not exceeding the safety limits, monitoring radiation exposure using mini C-arms with flat panel technology during surgery should be done in a future clinical study.

The utility of mini C-arm in the fixation of unstable paediatric supracondylar humeral fractures

BACKGROUND

Pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures have traditionally been reduced and fixed with conventional C-arm (CCA) fluoroscopy guidance. With the increase in popularity of the newer mini C-arm (MCA) system within other fields of surgery due to its ease of use and lower radiation emission, the same adoption should be explored in pediatric orthopedic surgeries. The purpose of this study is to compare the MCA and CCA primarily in reduction and fixation outcomes and secondarily in other perioperative parameters.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 193 patients who underwent surgical fixation for displaced supracondylar humerus fractures. 44 and 149 cases were performed with the MCA and CCA respectively. Baumann's angle and the intersection of anterior humeral line (AHL) were assessed on postoperative anterior posterior and lateral radiographs and adequate reduction was defined by an angle between 64 and 81˚, and AHL intersecting middle third of the capitellum. Surgical time, fluoroscopy duration, number of images and radiation exposure were obtained from the surgical notes.

RESULTS

Amongst the CCA cases, there were greater satisfactory coronal plane reduction (p < 0.05), while no difference in sagittal plane accuracy (p > 0.05) was seen. In MCA group, longer surgical (p < 0.05) and fluoroscopy times (p < 0.05), and greater number of shots (p < 0.05) was noted. However overall radiation exposure in the MCA group was still lower (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The MCA system is potentially less accurate in coronal plane reduction and more challenging to use. However, pitfalls can easily be avoided. Usage should be advocated as overall radiation exposure can be reduced.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III retrospective comparative study.

Effect of metallic tools on scattered radiation dose during the use of C-arm fluoroscopy in orthopaedic surgery

This study investigated the effect of metallic tools on the scattered radiation dose delivered to surgeons' radiosensitive organs while simulating hip surgery using C-arm fluoroscopy. Two phantoms, a pelvis and a Rando phantom, were used to simulate a patient and a surgeon in this study. Photoluminescence dosimeters were inserted into the Rando phantom in the positions of the eye, thyroid and gonad. A drill was positioned above the hip of the pelvis phantom or beside the pelvis phantom of the same height. For each drill location, the scattered radiation dose was measured when the angle to the operator phantom was 45°; this was repeated when the angle was 90°. The scattered radiation doses to the eye, thyroid and gonad when the drill was placed beside the pelvis phantom with 90° angulation to the operator phantom were significantly lower than the reference values and those when the drill was placed beside the pelvis phantom at a 45° angulation to the operator phantom. The scattered radiation doses to the eye and thyroid when the drill was placed above the hip were significantly lower than the references values. Of the four different scenarios, the scattered radiation doses to the eye, thyroid and gonad were lowest when the drill was placed beside the pelvis phantom with 90° angulation. This study showed that the scattered radiation doses to radiosensitive organs were affected by the location and angle of the metallic tools in relation to the operator. Therefore, orthopedic surgeons should consider the effect of metallic tools on the scattered radiation dose during intraoperative use of C-arm fluoroscopy.

Radiation Exposure to Surgeon and Assistant During Flat Panel Mini C-Arm Fluoroscopy in Hand and Wrist Surgical Procedures

PURPOSE

During mini C-arm fluoroscopy, both the patient and surgical team are exposed to scatter radiation. The objective of this study was to quantify body, thyroid, and hand radiation exposure to surgeon and assistant during intraoperative use of flat panel mini C-arm fluoroscopy in hand and wrist surgical procedures.

METHODS

Over 5 months, the surgeon's and assistant's radiation exposure was recorded during all osseous hand and wrist surgical procedures. Whole-body and thyroid radiation exposure were measured with 2 types of dosimeters: a photon thermoluminescence detector and a RaySafe i2 real-time dosimeter. Ring dosimeters were used to quantify hand radiation exposure.

RESULTS

Mini C-arm fluoroscopy was used in 94 surgical procedures. Total fluoroscopy time was 1,996 seconds and varied between surgical procedures (range, 1-152 seconds; median, 11 seconds). No thermoluminescence detector photon dosimeter exceeded the threshold limit of 0.1 mSv. The RaySafe i2 real-time dosimeters recorded a cumulated dose of 0.029 mSv for the body and 0.012 mSv for the thyroid position of the surgeon. The assistant received a cumulated dose of 0.011 mSv for the body and 0.011 mSv for the thyroid position. The ring dosimeters showed a cumulated dosage of 1.28 mSv for the surgeon and 0.20 mSv for the assistant.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that the surgeon's and assistant's body, thyroid, and hands were exposed to acceptable levels of scatter radiation during intraoperative use of the flat panel mini C-arm. The surgeon received the highest radiation exposure: 2.9% of the yearly radiation limits for the body, 0.05% for the thyroid position, and 2.56% for the hands. The assistant was exposed to less scatter radiation: 1.1% for the body, 0.04% for the thyroid, and 0.4% for the hands.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study quantified radiation levels to which surgeon and assistant are exposed during mini C-arm fluoroscopy in hand and wrist surgical procedures.

Comparison of screw versus locked plate fixation for Scarf osteotomy treatment of hallux valgus

INTRODUCTION

The Scarf osteotomy is a commonly used surgical procedure for treating hallux valgus in Europe. Screw fixation is standard practice, although some surgeons now go without internal fixation. Plate fixation is still being studied. The aim of this study was to compare the radiological outcomes of these fixation methods, which has not been performed up to now.

HYPOTHESIS

Relative to screw fixation, plate fixation of a Scarf osteotomy of the first metatarsal (M1) prevents secondary impaction, without increasing the complication rate or recurrence rate.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study was performed of two internal fixation methods for Scarf osteotomy (screw vs. plate), by analyzing the secondary impaction of the first metatarsal, recurrence of the hallux valgus (angle M1P1>20) on X-rays, incidence of complications and potential discomfort related to the hardware. The osteotomy procedure was the same in both groups: 50patients were included consecutively in each fixation group between February 2014 and November 2015.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 13.0±2.7months in the screw group and 12.3±1.1 months in the plate group. There were no severe complications, although four cases of delayed wound healing occurred (3in plate group, 1in screw group). In the screw group, there was one case of secondary impaction, two cases of recurrence (4%) and one case of discomfort. In the plate group, there were no cases of impaction, three recurrences (6%) and five cases of discomfort, leading to plate removal in three of these cases.

DISCUSSION

There was no significant difference between groups in the M1 secondary impaction rate or recurrence rate: screw fixation did not lead to a higher recurrence rate. Systematic fixation with a locked plate for Scarf osteotomy had no advantages over screw fixation in our study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II, Comparative study with continuous cohorts.

C-arm fluoroscopy in orthopaedic surgical practice

The use of C-arm fluoroscopy in intraoperative orthopaedic procedures has become an important tool in modern orthopaedic surgical practice. It enhances the technical proficiency of the surgeon in addition to reducing the morbidity and length of hospital stay of the patient. Despite the documented benefits of this device, there has been a growing concern about the increased radiation exposure to the surgical team. We therefore present the review of the literature on the usefulness of C-arm fluoroscopy, pitfalls in application of the machine as well as the harmful radiation effects and precautionary measures that need to be observed when using the C-arm fluoroscopy in orthopaedic surgical procedures.

The Effect of C-Arm Mobility and Field of Vision on Radiation Exposure in the Treatment of Proximal Femoral Fractures: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Objectives

To examine the effect of fluoroscopy devices with different sizes of image intensifier and C-arm maneuverability on operating time, fluoroscopy time, radiation dose and reduction, and fixation quality at intertrochanteric femoral fractures.

Design

Single-center, randomized, prospective study.

Setting

Academic Level I trauma hospital.

Patients and Intervention

34 patients treated with cephalomedullary nailing for a stable, intertrochanteric proximal femur fracture (OTA A1).

Main Outcome Measurement

The total working time of the fluoroscopy device, the dose-area product (DAP), operating time, reduction quality (cortical continuity, symmetrical collodiaphyseal angle, and shortness), and fixation quality (Bosworth quadrants, the tip-apex distance, TAD).

Results

There were no cases of poor reduction; also the placement of the blade was optimal for 14 patients and suboptimal in 3 patients in each group. Superior-posterior placement of the blade or TAD > 25 mm was not seen in any patient. Total operating time was significantly shorter when using device A compared to the use of device B (20.1 ± 3.4 mins versus 25.3 ± 5.4 mins, p < 0.001). Total radiation time was significantly shorter with device A compared to the use of device B (58.1 ± 19.4 secs versus 98.9  ±  55.4 secs, p = 0.008). The measured radiation dose was lower with the use of device A compared to device B (3.5  ±  1.2 Gy·cm² versus 7.3  ±  4.5 Gy·cm², p = 0.002).

Conclusion

Physical properties of fluoroscopy devices used during the fixation of intertrochanteric fractures could yield significant differences in operating times and the radiation dose while having comparable clinical results.

The Great Unknown-A systematic literature review about risk associated with intraoperative imaging during orthopaedic surgeries

INTRODUCTION

Modern techniques in orthopaedic surgery using minimally invasive procedures, and increased use of fluoroscopic imaging present a potential increased risk to surgeons due to ionizing radiation exposure. This article is a systematic review of recent literature on radiation exposure of orthopaedic surgeons.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Pubmed and Cochrane searches were performed on intraoperative radiation exposure covering English and German articles published between 1.1.2000 and 11.8.2014. Inclusion criteria were clinical studies and systematic literature reviews focusing on radiation exposure of orthopaedic surgeons during surgical procedures of the musculoskeletal system reporting either effective dose (whole body) or equivalent dose at the organ level. All included articles were reviewed with focus on the surgical specialty, the procedure type, the imaging system used, the radiation measurement method, the fluoroscopy time, the radiation exposure, the use of radiation protection, and any references to specific safety guidelines.

RESULTS

Thirty-four eligible publications were identified. However, the lack of well-designed studies focusing on radiation exposure of surgeons prevents pooling of data. Highest exposure and subsequent equivalent doses were reported from spinal surgery (up to 4.8mSv of equivalent dose to the hand) and intramedullary nailing (up to 0.142mSV of equivalent dose to the thyroid). Radiation exposure was reduced by 96.9% and 94.2% when wearing a thyroid collar and a lead apron.

CONCLUSIONS

With the increasing use of intraoperative imaging, there is a growing need for radiation awareness by the operating surgeon. Strict adherence to radiation protection should be enforced to protect in-training surgeons. Strategies to reduce exposure include C-arm position, distance, protective wear, and new imaging technologies. Radiation exposure is harmful and action should be taken to minimize exposure.

Intraoperative radiation safety in orthopaedics: a review of the ALARA (As low as reasonably achievable) principle

The use of fluoroscopy has become commonplace in many orthopaedic surgery procedures. The benefits of fluoroscopy are not without risk of radiation to patient, surgeon, and operating room staff. There is a paucity of knowledge by the average orthopaedic resident in terms proper usage and safety. Personal protective equipment, proper positioning, effective communication with the radiology technician are just of few of the ways outlined in this article to decrease the amount of radiation exposure in the operating room. This knowledge ensures that the amount of radiation exposure is as low as reasonably achievable. Currently, in the United States, guidelines for teaching radiation safety in orthopaedic surgery residency training is non-existent. In Europe, studies have also exhibited a lack of standardized teaching on the basics of radiation safety in the operating room. This review article will outline the basics of fluoroscopy and educate the reader on how to safe fluoroscopic image utilization.

Performances of a protector against scattered radiation during intraoperative use of a C-arm fluoroscope

The scattered radiation protector for mobile x-ray systems, Creative Valuable Protector-2, has been recently developed. However, there have been no studies investigating the effects of this device. We aim to investigate the effects of the scattered radiation protector on the equivalent doses from scattered radiation delivered to radiosensitive organs while simulating spine surgery using a C-arm fluoroscope. Chest and rando phantoms were used to simulate a patient and a surgeon in this study. The equivalent dose from scattered radiation to radiosensitive organs was measured in four different situations according to the use of the scattered radiation protector and the C-arm configuration. To compare the quality of the images with and without the scattered radiation protector, an acryl step phantom with five steps was used, and the contrast resolution of each step was calculated. The equivalent dose from the scattered radiation to the surgeon's eye, thyroid, and gonad decreased significantly by using the scattered radiation protector for both the Posteroanterior (PA) (p  <  0.001) and Anteroposterior (AP) (p  <  0.001) C-arm configurations. The installation of the scattered radiation protector also reduced the direct radiation dose to the chest phantom. A scattered map showed that scattered radiation doses decreased by approximately 50% for the PA configuration and 75% for the AP configuration by using the scattered radiation protector. Before and after installation of the scattered radiation protector, the contrast resolution of each adjacent step area was 0.025-0.404 and 0.216-0.421. The scattered radiation protector was effective in reducing not only the equivalent dose from scattered radiation to the surgeon's radiosensitive organs, but also the direct radiation dose to the patient. This was all achieved without decreasing the quality of the C-arm fluoroscopic images.

Radiation Exposure and Hand Dominance Using Mini C-Arm Fluoroscopy in Hand Surgery

BACKGROUND

The mini C-arm is popular with hand surgeons, and they are particularly at risk for radiation exposure, as they cannot easily distance themselves from the radiation beam. We hypothesized that the nondominant hand receives more radiation exposure than the dominant hand as it is generally closer to the radiation source. This study seeks to determine whether a hand surgeon receives a different amount of radiation exposure to their hands based on hand dominance and then accounting for this, provide a more accurate assessment of hand radiation exposure from mini C-arm fluoroscopy.

METHODS

Two fellowship-trained hand surgeons wore ring dosimeters on both hands during surgeries with mini C-arm fluoroscopy involving bony work of the forearm and hand. Radiation exposure to the hands was measured from ring dosimeters.

RESULTS

Six-ring dosimeter pairs were worn during 64 cases, averaging 10.7 cases per ring. No ring met the minimal dose threshold of 30 mrem to record a numerical value. Each ring experienced an average of 413 seconds of fluoroscopy time and 66.3509 cGy*cm(2) of radiation output from the mini C-arm.

CONCLUSIONS

The results do not allow comparison of radiation exposure related to hand dominance. Assuming worst-case scenario: each ring measured 29 mrem (just below the threshold), the surgeon's hands experienced 2.7 mrem per case. This would allow a hand surgeon to perform 18 391 cases per year before exceeding the allowable annual hand exposure limit of 50 000 mrem set by the National Council of Radiation Protection and Measurements and International Commission on Radiological Protection.

Measurements of surgeons' exposure to ionizing radiation dose: comparison of conventional and mini C-arm fluoroscopy

This study was performed to measure the equivalent scattered radiation dose delivered to susceptible organs while simulating orthopaedic surgery using conventional and mini C-arm fluoroscopy. In addition, shielding effects on the thyroid, thymus, and gonad, and the direct exposure delivered to the patient's hands were also compared. A conventional and mini C-arms were installed in an operating room, and a hand and an operator phantom were used to simulate a patient's hand and a surgeon. Photoluminescence dosimeters were used to measure the equivalent dose by scattered radiation arriving at the thyroid, thymus, and gonad on a whole-body phantom in the position of the surgeon. Equivalent scattered radiation doses were measured in four groups: (1) unshielded conventional C-arm group; (2) unshielded mini C-arm group; (3) lead-shielded conventional C-arm group; and (4) lead-shielded mini C-arm group. Equivalent scattered radiation doses to the unshielded group were significantly lower in the mini C-arm group than those in the conventional C-arm group for all organs. The gonad in the lead-shielded conventional C-arm group showed the highest equivalent dose among operator-susceptible organs, and radiation dose was reduced by approximately 96% compared with that in the unshielded group. Scattered radiation was not detected in any susceptible organ in the lead-shielded mini C-arm group. The direct radiation dose to the hand phantom measured from the mini C-arm was significantly lower than that measured from the conventional C-arm. The results show that the equivalent scattered radiation dose to the surgeon's susceptible organs and the direct radiation dose to a patient's hand can be decreased significantly by using a mini C-arm rather than a conventional C-arm. However, protective lead garments, such as a thyroid shield and apron, should be applied to minimize radiation exposure to susceptible organs, even during use of mini C-arm fluoroscopy.

Measurement of Radiation Exposure When Using the Mini C-Arm to Reduce Pediatric Upper Extremity Fractures

BACKGROUND

Previous literature has underreported radiation exposure with the use of mini C-arm during pediatric forearm fracture reductions. The purpose of this study is to report an accurate amount of radiation exposure during fracture reductions using a mini C-arm that records the amount of kilovolts, milliamps, and the number of seconds of foot pedal use.

METHODS

Eighty-six consecutive pediatric patients undergoing upper extremity fracture reduction in the emergency department were studied. The orthopaedic resident, either a PGY2 or PGY3, performed a manipulative reduction and casting of the fracture with use of the mini C-arm. Postreduction, in cast, anteroposterior and lateral images from the mini C-arm were saved to the computerized radiology system. The mini C-arm recorded the amount of kilovolts, milliamps, and the number of seconds that the foot pedal was used for each reduction. A radiology physicist (S.K.) calculated the amount of millirem (mR) exposure for each reduction from these data.

RESULTS

The resident using the mini C-arm and the fracture pattern affected the amount of radiation exposure. The average mini C-arm mR exposure for distal radius fractures was 63 mR; forearm 109 mR; elbow 53 mR; and hand 69 mR. For comparison, conventional anteroposterior/lateral forearm radiographs emit an average of 20 mR. Less-experienced PGY2 residents had a higher mR exposure per reduction compared with PGY3 residents.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiation exposure when using the mini C-arm for reduction of pediatric fractures has been underestimated in previous literature. Radiation from the mini C-arm exceeded that from conventional radiographs in most cases. We recommend that residents receive training about the use of the mini C-arm before its utilization as an aid to reduce pediatric fractures in the emergency department.

The use of dual C-arms during fixation of calcaneal fractures: a technique tip

We describe a simple technique using dual C-arms (large and mini C-arm together) for open reduction internal fixation of calcaneal fractures in the lateral decubitus position that (1) decreases the difficulty of obtaining proper intraoperative imaging; (2) limits C-arm movement, which decreases risk of contamination and operative time; and (3) minimizes the drawbacks of each imaging fluoroscopic modality.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

Level V, Technical tip, Expert opinion.

Types and arrangement of thyroid shields to reduce exposure of surgeons to ionizing radiation during intraoperative use of C-arm fluoroscopy

STUDY DESIGN

Measurement of radiation dose from C-arm fluoroscopy during a simulated intraoperative use in spine surgery.

OBJECTIVE

To assess how the radiation dose is affected by changes in the types of thyroid shields used and by the arrangements or ways in which they are worn during the intraoperative use of C-arm fluoroscopy.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Although the danger to the thyroid from exposure to radiation is well known, there are no guidelines for the proper use of thyroid shields.

METHODS

Two photoluminescence dosimeters were used to measure the dose of scattered radiation arriving at the location of the thyroid in a whole-body phantom in the position of the surgeon. On an operating table beside this setup was an anthropomorphic chest phantom representing a patient for which treatment with C-arm fluoroscopy was simulated. Radiation doses were measured using 3 different arrangements of the thyroid shield: worn tightly, worn loosely, and worn loosely with a bismuth masking reagent. The same tests were performed using 2 kinds of thyroid shield: lead and lead-equivalent.

RESULTS

For the lead-shield group, radiation doses were measured in 3 arrangements; worn tightly, worn loosely, and worn loosely with a bismuth masking reagent, for which the results were 1.91 ± 0.13, 2.35 ± 0.22, and 1.86 ± 0.13 μSv/min, respectively. Wearing the shield tight against the throat and wearing it loose with a bismuth masking reagent led to lower radiation exposure levels than by simply wearing the shield loosely (P ≤ 0.001). For the lead-equivalent shield group, doses were measured for the same 3 arrangements, for which the results were 1.79 ± 0.12, 1.82 ± 0.11, and 1.74 ± 0.12 μSv/min. Lower scattered radiation doses were delivered to the thyroid in the lead-equivalent thyroid shield group compared with the lead thyroid shield group (P ≤ 0.001). The unshielded thyroid group received a radiation dose of 16.32 ± 0.48 μSv/min.

CONCLUSION

The use of some form of thyroid shield is essential during the use of C-arm fluoroscopy. It was found that the best way to reduce scattered radiation exposure to the thyroid was wearing the thyroid shield tightly or wearing it loosely in combination with a bismuth masking reagent.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2.

Measurements of surgeons' exposure to ionizing radiation dose during intraoperative use of C-arm fluoroscopy

STUDY DESIGN

Measurement of radiation dose from C-arm fluoroscopy during a simulated intraoperative use in spine surgery. OBJECTIVE.: To investigate scatter radiation doses to specific organs of surgeons during intraoperative use of C-arm fluoroscopy in spine surgery and to provide practical intraoperative guidelines.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

There have been studies that reported the radiation dose of C-arm fluoroscopy in various procedures. However, radiation doses to surgeons' specific organs during spine surgery have not been sufficiently examined, and the practical intraoperative radioprotective guidelines have not been suggested.

METHODS

Scatter radiation dose (air kerma rate) was measured during the use of a C-arm on an anthropomorphic chest phantom on an operating table. Then, a whole body anthropomorphic phantom was located besides the chest phantom to simulate a surgeon, and scatter radiation doses to specific organs (eye, thyroid, breast, and gonads) and direct radiation dose to the surgeon's hand were measured using 4 C-arm configurations (standard, inverted, translateral, and tube translateral). The effects of rotating the surgeon's head away from the patient and of a thyroid shield were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Scatter radiation doses decreased as distance from the patient increased during C-arm fluoroscopy use. The standard and translateral C-arm configurations caused lower scatter doses to sensitive organs than inverted and tube translateral configurations. Scatter doses were highest for breast and lowest for gonads. The use of a thyroid shield and rotating the surgeon's head away from the patient reduced scatter radiation dose to the surgeon's thyroid and eyes. The direct radiation dose was at least 20 times greater than scatter doses to sensitive organs.

CONCLUSION

The following factors could reduce radiation exposure during intraoperative use of C-arm; (1) distance from the patient, (2) C-arm configuration, (3) radioprotective equipments, (4) rotating the surgeons' eyes away from the patient, and (5) avoiding direct exposure of surgeons' hands.

Hand and body radiation exposure with the use of mini C-arm fluoroscopy

PURPOSE

To determine whole body and hand radiation exposure to the hand surgeon wearing a lead apron during routine intraoperative use of the mini C-arm fluoroscope.

METHODS

Four surgeons (3 hand attending surgeons and 1 hand fellow) monitored their radiation exposure for a total of 200 consecutive cases (50 cases per surgeon) requiring mini C-arm fluoroscopy. Each surgeon measured radiation exposure with a badge dosimeter placed on the outside breast pocket of the lead apron (external whole body exposure), a second badge dosimeter under the lead apron (shielded whole body exposure), and a ring dosimeter (hand exposure).

RESULTS

Completed records were noted in 198 cases, with an average fluoroscopy time of 133.52 seconds and average cumulative dose of 19,260 rem-cm(2) per case. The total measured radiation exposures for the (1) external whole body exposure dosimeters were 16 mrem (for shallow depth), 7 mrem (for eye depth), and less than 1 mrem (for deep depth); (2) shielded whole body badge dosimeters recorded less than 1 mrem; and (3) ring dosimeters totaled 170 mrem. The total radial exposure for 4 ring dosimeters that had registered a threshold of 30 mrem or more of radiation exposure was 170 mrem at the skin level, for an average of 42.5 mrem per dosimeter ring or 6.3 mrem per case.

CONCLUSIONS

This study of whole body and hand radiation exposure from the mini C-arm includes the largest number of surgical cases in the published literature. The measured whole body and hand radiation exposure received by the hand surgeon from the mini C-arm represents a minimal risk of radiation, based on the current National Council on Radiation Protection and Management standards of annual dose limits (5,000 mrem per year for whole body and 50,000 mrem per year to the extremities).

A comparative study of radiation dose and screening time between mini C-arm and standard fluoroscopy in elective foot and ankle surgery

BACKGROUND

Mini C-arm devices have gained popularity in extremity surgery. There is little evidence of the benefits of this technique in the clinical setting of foot and ankle surgery. We used dose area product (DAP) to compare radiation usage between mini C-arm and standard fluoroscopy.

METHODS

We prospectively reviewed 127 cases requiring intra-operative screening during elective foot and ankle surgery.

RESULTS

Mini C-arm was used in 55 patients and standard fluoroscopy in 72 patients. There was a statistically significant reduction in mean DAP using the mini C-arm, 3.46 Gy cm² vs 7.43 Gy cm² (P=0.0013). There was no difference in screening time. The annual saving from using the mini C-arm could be £9391, saving the total cost of the device over 5 years.

CONCLUSION

The mini C-arm reduces radiation risk and costs when compared to standard fluoroscopy. We recommend its regular use in foot and ankle surgery.

Cervical spine imaging using mini--C-arm fluoroscopy: patient and surgeon exposure to direct and scatter radiation

STUDY DESIGN

Direct and scatter radiation was measured during cadaveric cervical spine imaging with a mini-C-arm fluoroscope.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate radiation exposure to the patient and surgeon when using a mini-C-arm fluoroscope to image the cervical spine.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Prior studies have quantified radiation exposure using large C-arm fluoroscopy during procedures involving the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine. To our knowledge, no studies have quantified radiation exposure during mini-C-arm fluoroscopy of the cervical spine.

METHODS

A calibrated OEC MINI 6800 C-arm was used to image a prepared cadaveric cervical spine specimen, which included the skull. The specimen was suspended on an adjustable polycarbonate platform. Thirteen film badge dosimeters were mounted at various positions and angles to detect direct and scatter radiation. Recorded exposure levels were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

Surgeon exposures from the mini-C-arm were considerably lower than previously reported with the standard C-arm, but nonetheless concerning. Patient exposures were considerable and not always reduced compared with values from the standard C-arm. The kVp generated by the mini-C-arm was similar to the standard C-arm. Dosimeters mounted in the same plane recorded dissimilar amounts of radiation during the same test, which underscores the influence of shape on the amount of reflected scatter.

CONCLUSIONS

Although using a mini-C-arm unit may reduce exposure levels, substantial exposure to both patient and staff is still achievable. Use of a mini-C-arm for cervical spine imaging reduces exposure to the surgeon more effectively than to the patient. To lower the risk of radiation exposure in the cadaver laboratory, a mini-C-arm should be used in each instance that offers appropriate visualization. In the operating room, all appropriate radiation dose-reducing measures should be strictly enforced by supervising physicians to minimize risk to patients, medical staff, and themselves.

Cadaveric assessment of a new guidewire insertion device for volar percutaneous fixation of nondisplaced scaphoid fracture

PURPOSE

Volar percutaneous screw fixation (PSF) of acute nondisplaced scaphoid waist fractures allows early mobilisation of the wrist and a faster return to work than prolonged cast immobilisation. Usually, placement of the wire which guides the definitive canulated screw is performed by hand. Nevertheless, correct placement of this wire is technically difficult. We designed a guidewire insertion device (GID) to facilitate this placement.

METHODS

We compared the hand held technique with the technique using the GID in a cadaveric study. The hand held technique was performed on 16 scaphoids and the GID was used in 16 other scaphoids. The four participating surgeons were divided into two groups: two experienced surgeons and two inexperienced surgeons.

RESULTS

The GID significantly decreased procedure duration (P<0.001), number of attempts to place the wire (P<0.001), and number of image-intensifier shots (P<0.001). With both techniques, experienced surgeons were significantly faster (P=0.0083) and required significantly fewer attempts (P=0.043) than inexperienced surgeons. Using the GID, the procedure duration (P=0.0039) and the number of image-intensifier shots (P<0.001) decreased more with inexperienced surgeons than with experienced surgeons. As for the number of attempts, there was no statistical difference between the two groups (P=0.32).

CONCLUSIONS

The GID decreased the time and radiation exposure needed to achieve correct volar percutaneous wire placement in the scaphoid, compared to the conventional hand held technique. Easier wire placement may lead surgeons to use PSF instead of prolonged cast immobilisation for treating nondisplaced scaphoid fractures.

Patient and surgeon radiation exposure: comparison of standard and mini-C-arm fluoroscopy

BACKGROUND

Use of c-arm fluoroscopy is common in the operating room, outpatient clinic, and emergency department. Consequently, there is a concern regarding radiation exposure. Mini-c-arm fluoroscopes have gained popularity; however, few studies have quantified exposure during mini-c-arm imaging of a body part larger than a hand or wrist. The purpose of this study was to measure radiation exposure sustained by the patient and surgeon during the use of large and mini-c-arm fluoroscopy of an ankle specimen.

METHODS

Standard and mini-c-arm fluoroscopes were used to image a cadaver ankle specimen, which was suspended on an adjustable platform. Dosimeters were mounted at specific positions and angulations to detect direct and scatter radiation. Testing was conducted under various scenarios that altered the proximity of the specimen and the radiation source. We attempted to capture a range of exposure data under conditions ranging from a best to a worst-case scenario, as one may encounter in a procedural setting.

RESULTS

With all configurations tested, measurable exposure during use of the large-c-arm fluoroscope was considerably higher than that during use of the mini-c-arm fluoroscope. Patient and surgeon exposure was notably amplified when the specimen was positioned closer to the x-ray source. The exposure values that we measured during ankle fluoroscopy were consistently higher than the exposure values that have been recorded previously during hand or wrist imaging.

CONCLUSIONS

Exposure of the patient and surgeon to radiation depends on the tissue density and the shape of the imaged extremity. Elevated exposure levels can be expected when larger body parts are imaged or when the extremity is positioned closer to the x-ray source. When it is possible to satisfactorily image an extremity with use of the mini c-arm, it should be chosen over its larger counterpart.

Minimally invasive soft-tissue and osseous stabilization (MISOS) technique for midfoot and hindfoot deformities

The surgical repair of unstable midfoot and hindfoot deformities in the high-risk patient remains a challenge with little guidance available in the literature. The author presents a proposed surgical intervention for midfoot and hindfoot deformities utilizing a minimally invasive soft-tissue and osseous stabilization (MISOS) approach. The article presents a detailed, step-by-step description of the procedure used for these difficult limb salvage cases.