Medial capsular interpositional arthroplasty for severe hallux rigidus

Interpositional Arthroplasty for Hallux Rigidus: Surgical Technique and Outcomes Discussion

Interpositional arthroplasty for the treatment of hallux rigidus (HR) involves resection of the diseased joint surface and placement of spacer material within the joint to preserve length at the metatarsophalangeal joint while still allowing for range of motion. The majority of studies available in the literature have focused on capsular interpositional arthroplasty, revealing generally positive outcomes. Other forms of interpositional arthroplasty are less supported by long-term follow-up and large sample sizes. Moreover, there exists substantial heterogeneity in the studies evaluating interpositional arthroplasty. Despite the limitations of the current data, interpositional arthroplasty seems to be a viable treatment option for HR.

Interposition Arthroplasty in the Treatment of End-Stage Hallux Rigidus: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

Patients affected by moderate to severe hallux rigidus may opt for interposition arthroplasty to avoid the movement restrictions of arthrodesis and the complications related to prosthetic replacement. The propose of this article was to review the current literature about interposition arthroplasty to examine the overall outcomes and to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of different types of technique, compared with more consolidated procedures.

METHODS

A literature PubMed search was performed. Studies reporting the results of interposition arthroplasty in moderate to severe hallux rigidus were included. The data were pooled and weighted for number of patients in every study.

RESULTS

The overall results for interposition arthroplasties are comparable to other alternatives for end-stage hallux rigidus, providing better plantar load distribution than arthrodesis and avoiding the drawbacks of prosthetic replacement. Among the various interposition arthroplasty techniques, the Modified Oblique Keller Capsular Interposition Arthroplasty technique preserves toe length and flexor hallucis brevis function, showing the highest satisfaction rate, with lowest metatarsalgia and revision rate.

CONCLUSION

Although long-term randomized controlled trials are lacking for interposition arthroplasty, it represents a valid alternative for the treatment of end-stage hallux rigidus also in the young active patient who wants to avoid a definitive intervention immediately.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III (systematic review of level III-IV-V studies).

Converting 1st metatarsophalangeal joint fusion to interposition arthroplasty. Mid-term results of a case series

BACKGROUND

Fusion of the first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint has been considered as the gold standard for treatment of advanced hallux rigidus. The main disadvantage is the restriction of movement which may not be as favorable as anticipated by several patients. The purpose of this study was to report clinical and functional outcomes on patients who were treated with interposition arthroplasty after a 1st MTP joint fusion which had not fulfilled their expectations.

METHODS

Between 2009 and 2014, 11 patients who were not satisfied by 1st MTP joint fusion for hallux rigidus, underwent a conversion to interposition arthroplasty. After removal of hardware, the fusion was taken down by removal of a bone block from the fused joint. A fascia lata graft was interposed. Intraoperative and postoperative complications, range of motion of the first MTP joint, length of first ray, and patients' satisfaction were recorded as the primary outcomes.

RESULTS

Mean age was 34 years (range, 24-42 y). The mean ± SD AOFAS/H/MTP/IP score was 61 ± 5.5 preoperatively, 90.5 ± 4.5 at one year and 92 ± 4 at five years postoperatively (p < 0.001). The mean ± SD VAS-FA score was 91 ± 3.5 preoperatively, 94.5 ± 2.5 at one year and 95 ± 2.5 at five years postoperatively (p > 0.05). Mean ROM at the final follow-up was 58° ± 5° of dorsiflexion and 27° ± 4° of plantarflexion. No inter- or postoperative complications were encountered. The length of the hallux was decreased by a mean of 1.5 mm (range, 1-2.5 mm). All patients were satisfied with the overall outcome, walking ability and shoe-wear convenience and graded their condition as excellent (9 cases) or good (2 cases).

CONCLUSIONS

Converting a 1st MTP joint fusion to interposition arthroplasty with a fascia lata allograft could be a safe alternative with promising results in selected cases especially in relatively young and athletic population.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV retrospective case series.

Republication of "Current Concepts Review: Hallux Rigidus"

Arthritis of the first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint, hallux rigid, is a common and disabling source of foot pain in the adult population. Hallux rigidus is characterized by diseased cartilage and large, periarticular osteophytes that result in a stiff, painful joint. Activity modification, sensible shoes, orthotics, anti-inflammatory medications and occasional intra-articular steroid injections can be attempted to alleviate the discomfort associated with hallux rigidus. A number of surgical options exist for the treatment of recalcitrant hallux rigidus. Cheilectomy is a useful treatment for dorsal impingement pain seen in mild hallux rigidus. A new polyvinyl alcohol hemi-arthroplasty implant has shown promising early and midterm results in the treatment of advanced hallux rigidus; however, arthrodesis of the first MTP joint remains the gold standard treatment for advanced hallux rigidus because of unpredictable outcomes after early-generation joint replacement implants.

Keller's arthroplasty for hallux rigidus: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Several surgical procedures have been described to treat hallux rigidus. Keller arthroplasty is a joint-sacrificing procedure proposed in 1904. Considering the current trends to mini-invasiveness and the debate about the technique's suitability, this review intends to state Keller arthroplasty results and the conditions where it could be still adopted in the treatment of hallux rigidus.

METHODS

Selected articles were reviewed to extract: population data, surgical indications, different surgical techniques, clinical and radiological outcomes, and complications.

RESULTS

Seventeen retrospective studies were selected, counting 508 patients. Mean age at surgery was 55 years. Patients were affected by moderate-severe hallux rigidus. Three modified Keller arthroplasty were identified. Good clinical and radiological outcomes were reported. Metatarsalgia was the most frequent complication (12%).

CONCLUSION

Despite for many authors KA seems a viable surgical treatment for middle aged and elderly patients affected by moderate-severe hallux rigidus, the available literature provides little evidence on the real efficacy and safety of the technique. A non-negligible percentage of complications may occur, and therefore is essential to set correct indications through an accurate patients' selection.

Interpositional Arthroplasty in the Treatment of Hallux Rigidus: A Systematic Review

Hallux rigidus is the most common arthritic condition of the foot. Interpositional arthroplasty (IPA) is indicated for advanced-stage hallux rigidus and attempts to maintain joint motion through insertion of a biologic spacer into the joint. However, the data evaluating the effectiveness of IPA are limited. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the outcomes of IPA in the treatment of hallux rigidus. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically reviewed based on the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines. Outcomes collected and analyzed included: American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) hallux metatarsophalangeal-interphalangeal (HMI) score, visual analogue scale score, short-form 36 score, range of motion (ROM), radiographic parameters, and postoperative complications. The level and quality of clinical evidence were recorded and assessed. Sixteen studies with a total of 428 patients met inclusion/exclusion criteria. The mean AOFAS-HMI score improved from 51.6 ± 10.1 (range 35.0-64.2) preoperatively to 86.0 ± 7.7 (range 71.6-95.4) postoperatively (p ≤ .001) at weighted mean follow-up of 58.0 ± 34.5 (range 16.5-135.6) months. The preoperative weighted mean total ROM was 39.3° ± 9.6° (range 24.2-49.9) and the postoperative weighted mean total ROM was 61.5° ± 4.8° (range 54.0-66.5) (p ≤ .001). The complication rate was 21.5% with metatarsalgia as the most commonly reported complication. One study was level 3 and 15 studies were level 4 clinical evidence. This systematic review demonstrates improvement in functional and ROM outcomes following IPA procedure at mid-term follow-up. The procedure however has a moderate complication rate. In addition, there is a low level and quality of evidence in the current literature with inconsistent reporting of data.

Minimally Invasive Dorsal Cheilectomy and Hallux Metatarsal Phalangeal Joint Arthroscopy for the Treatment of Hallux Rigidus

Background:

Hallux rigidus (HR) is a common source of forefoot pain and disability. For those who fail nonoperative treatment, minimally invasive dorsal cheilectomy (MIDC) is an increasingly popular alternative to the open approach with early positive results. Early failures may be due to lose bone debris from the MIDC as well as other intra-articular pathology that cannot be addressed with MIDC alone. Metatarsophalangeal (MTP) arthroscopy can be used in addition to MIDC to assess the joint after MIDC and address any intra-articular pathology while still maintaining the benefits of minimally invasive surgery. We report our clinical outcomes following MIDC combined with MTP arthroscopy.

Methods:

From November 2017 to July 2020, a retrospective analysis of all MIDC cheilectomies with MTP arthroscopy performed by the 2 senior authors was done. Wound complications, infections, revision rates, need for future surgery, conversion to fusion rates, pre- and postoperative range of motion, visual analog scale (VAS) scores, time to return to normal shoe, intraoperative arthroscopic findings, and operative time were collected. Follow-up average was 16.5 months (range 3-33 months).

Results:

A total of 20 patients were included with an average follow-up of 16.5 months. The average VAS score improved from 7.05 preoperatively to 0.75 postoperatively ( P < .05). Average range of motion in dorsiflexion increased from 32 to 48 degrees ( P < .05) and plantarflexion increased from 15 to 19 degrees plantarflexion ( P < .05). All patients were weightbearing as tolerated immediately after surgery in a postoperative shoe and transitioned to a regular shoe at average of 2.1 weeks. We had no wound infections, wound complications, revision surgeries, tendon injuries or nerve damage. One patient required conversion to a fusion 3 years after the index procedure. Average tourniquet time was 30.39 minutes (range 17-60 minutes) and total average operating room time was 59.7 minutes (range 40-87 minutes). On arthroscopic evaluation of the MTP joint after MIDC, 100% of patients had bone debris, 100% had synovitis, 10% had loose bodies, and 30% had large cartilage flaps within the joint.

Conclusion:

MIDC and first MTP joint arthroscopy for treatment of hallux rigidus provide improved pain relief with minimal complications while still maintaining the benefits touted for minimally invasive operative procedures. Additionally, we have shown a high rate of intra-articular debris along with intra-articular pathology such as synovitis, loose chondral flaps, and loose bodies that exist after MIDC. This combined procedure has the potential for improving patient outcomes and may minimize risk of future revision surgeries compared with MIDC alone.

Level of Evidence:

Level IV, case series study.

Is interposition arthroplasty a viable option for treatment of moderate to severe hallux rigidus? - A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

When conservative therapy for hallux rigidus fails, surgical options such as arthrodesis and interposition arthroplasty can be considered. Although arthrodesis of MTP joint is the gold standard treatment. However patients desiring MTP joint movement may opt for either interposition arthroplasty or implant arthroplasty to avoid the movement restrictions of arthrodesis. The purpose of this systematic review was to investigate clinical outcomes and complications following interposition arthroplasty for moderate to severe hallux rigidus, for patietns who would prefer to maintain range of motion in the MTP joint.

METHODS

A systematic search on MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane library database was performed during February 2018. Demographics, surgical techniques, clinical outcomes, radiological outcomes and complications were recorded from each included study. Pooled statistics performed for variables with homogenous data across the studies. A linear regression model used to compare the clinical outcomes between autogenous vs allogenous material interposition arthroplasty.

RESULTS

Fifteen articles were included in the systematic review. Mean AOFAS scores improved from preoperative 41.35 to postoperative 83.17. Mean pain, function, and alignment score improved from preoperative values of 14.9, 24.9, and 10 to postoperative values of 33.3, 35.8, and 14.5. Mean dorsiflexion increased from 21.27° (5-30) to 42.03° (25-71). Mean ROM improved from 21.06° to 46.43°. Joint space increased from 0.8mm to 2.5mm. The most common postoperative complications included metatarsalgia (13.9%), loss of ground contact (9.7%), osteonecrosis (5.4%), great toe weakness (4.8%), hypoesthesia (4.2%), decreased push off power (4.2%), and callous formation (4.2%).

CONCLUSION

Interposition arthroplasty is an effective treatment option with acceptable clinical outcomes in patients with moderate-severe hallux rigidus who prefer to maintain range of motion and accept the risk of future complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Outcomes Following Interposition Arthroplasty of the First Metatarsophalangeal Joint for the Treatment of Hallux Rigidus: A Systematic Review

Background:

Interposition arthroplasty of the first MTP joint has recently experienced renewed interest as a treatment for hallux rigidus. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the rapidly expanding literature on PRO following interposition arthroplasty of the first MTP joint.

Methods:

PubMed Central, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched. Inclusion criteria included length of time to follow-up, number of patients, outcome measure, and use of allogeneic or autogenous soft tissue or a synthetic matrix as interposition.

Results:

20 studies were included in the review, comprising 498 patients and 539 feet with mean time to follow-up of 4.5 years. The most common substance used for interposition in the included studies was autogenous first MTPJ capsular tissue, a technique reported on in 12 (60.0%) of the included articles. In studies reporting preoperative and postoperative outcomes by way of a standardized outcome scoring system, mean group improvements exceed minimal clinically important differences in the majority of studies. Eighty-five percent of the studies included in this review were of Level IV quality evidence, and of this subset of studies, 70.6% were of a retrospective nature. Progression to further surgery was observed in 3.8% of toes. The most common complication reported was transfer metatarsalgia of 1 or more lesser toes, observed in up to 57.9% of patients in one study.

Conclusion:

Interposition arthroplasty appears to be a viable option for the treatment of moderate to severe hallux rigidus in patients looking to salvage motion through the first metatarsophalangeal joint. A wide array of autogenous, allogeneic, and synthetic implant materials have surfaced in recent years, but long-term follow-up and prospective, comparative study designs with low risk of bias are limited.

Level of Evidence:

Level IV, systematic review of Level III-IV studies

PRINCIPLES OF SURGICAL TREATMENT IN PATIENTS WITH OSTEOARTHRITIS OF THE FIRST METATARSOPHALANGEAL JOINT

At present, there is no general approach to choosing surgical tactics for hallux rigidus. Many surgical procedures are used to treat osteoarthritis (OA) of the first metatarsophalangeal joint (FMPJ), which are relevant at different stages of the disease. Nevertheless, this fact also suggests that all proposed methods have one or other disadvantages. At the same time, FMPJ arthrodesis that relieves pain and is functionally inferior to joint-sparing surgery remains the gold standard. However, due to the fact that not only persons over the age of 50 years, but also younger patients often suffer from FMPJ OA, the most non-damaging option of joint-sparing surgery is cheilectomy with chondroplasty of the FMPJ, which allows restoration of painless joint motions, thus sparing the anatomy of the foot. Chondroplasty using the authologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC®) technique for knee, hip, and ankle cartilage defects is described. There are no reports on FMPJ chondroplasty with the AMIC method in either Russian or foreign literature.

Current Concepts Review

Arthritis of the first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint, hallux rigid, is a common and disabling source of foot pain in the adult population. Hallux rigidus is characterized by diseased cartilage and large, periarticular osteophytes that result in a stiff, painful joint. Activity modification, sensible shoes, orthotics, anti-inflammatory medications and occasional intra-articular steroid injections can be attempted to alleviate the discomfort associated with hallux rigidus. A number of surgical options exist for the treatment of recalcitrant hallux rigidus. Cheilectomy is a useful treatment for dorsal impingement pain seen in mild hallux rigidus. A new polyvinyl alcohol hemi-arthroplasty implant has shown promising early and midterm results in the treatment of advanced hallux rigidus; however, arthrodesis of the first MTP joint remains the gold standard treatment for advanced hallux rigidus because of unpredictable outcomes after early-generation joint replacement implants.

Rolled Tendon Allograft Interposition Arthroplasty for Salvage Surgery of the Hallux Metatarsophalangeal Joint

BACKGROUND

Hallux rigidus is a common osteoarthritic disease of the first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ). Few salvage treatment options exist that preserve motion for patients who have failed an initial procedure and who are not amenable to fusion, typically patients who are active or who would like to wear high heels. Allograft tendon interpositional arthroplasty is an unconventional salvage treatment option that may preserve motion and prevent bone loss.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review is reported of 19 patients who failed previous procedures and refused fusion who underwent allograft tendon interpositional arthroplasty of the hallux MTPJ by a single surgeon between 2012 and 2015. Outcomes included the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) hallux metatarsophalangeal-interphalangeal scale assessment as well as measurement of apparent joint space on anterior to posterior and lateral views.

RESULTS

The cumulative average AOFAS score for all patients was 68.5 preoperatively and 74.1 postoperatively. The average AOFAS pain subscore was 24.7 preoperatively and 26.8 postoperatively (SD = 7.7 and 13.8, respectively). Radiographically, patients had an increase in apparent joint space from pre- to postoperatively, most notable on the lateral view (0.6 to 4.7 mm; SD = 0.7 and 3.2 mm). Five patients required a second operative procedure, for an overall 26% reoperation rate. One patient underwent hallux MTPJ fusion after the interpositional arthroplasty. An additional 4 patients (21%) had symptoms requiring a steroid injection, and another 3 patients (16%) were recommended to undergo a revision procedure based on their symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Rolled allograft tendon interposition arthroplasty performed poorly as a salvage strategy for failed previous hallux MTPJ surgery for hallux rigidus because of a high rate of complication and minimal benefits. The senior author has abandoned the technique.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective case series.

Long-Term Follow-up of Capsular Interposition Arthroplasty for Hallux Rigidus

BACKGROUND

Capsular interposition arthroplasty is a joint- and motion-sparing procedure that has been shown as an effective alternative to fusion. This study aimed to evaluate patient function and satisfaction after long-term follow-up.

METHODS

Sixty-four patients were treated with capsular interposition arthroplasty for hallux rigidus by the senior author performed between February 1998 and July 2011. Twenty-two patients could not be reached for follow-up and were thus excluded from the analysis. Therefore, 42 remaining patients were evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS), Foot Function Index (FFI), Short Form 12 (SF-12), and patient satisfaction scores. The mean follow-up was 11.3 (range, 4-16) years.

RESULTS

The mean VAS for pain was 7.9 preoperatively and 1.8 postoperatively ( P = .003). The mean preoperative SF-12 physical score was 42.0 vs 64.2 postoperatively ( P = .02). The mean preoperative SF-12 mental score was 50.7, while the postoperative SF-12 mental score was 54.6 ( P = .01). The total FFI score also significantly improved, with a preoperative value of 98.3 and a postoperative mean score of 49.6 ( P = .001). The mean patient satisfaction score was 7.4 of 10. Overall, 39 of 42 patients (92.9%) stated they would have the surgery again. Four of the 42 patients (9.5%) required conversion to hallux metatarsophalangeal fusion at a mean of 6.1 years after the index procedure secondary to pain, but no other complications were reported.

CONCLUSION

Capsular interposition arthroplasty was a safe and effective treatment for severe hallux rigidus. These longer term results demonstrate a high level of patient satisfaction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective case series.

Minimal resection interposition arthroplasty of the first metatarsophalangeal joint

BACKGROUND

Interposition arthroplasty of the first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint is a viable alternative to fusion in patients with advanced hallux rigidus. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the midterm results of a modification of the technique.

METHODS

Case series of 18 interposition arthroplasties were performed on 13 female patients with Grade III-IV hallux rigidus. The technique included cheilectomy, bunionectomy when needed, minimal resection of the base of the proximal phalanx and interposition of a fascia lata allograft in the first metatarsophalangeal joint. Mean follow up was nine years (range 75-136 months). Patients were evaluated according to the AOFAS score, the ability to tip toe and their subjective satisfaction.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference between preoperative (mean 43.2, range 15-83) and postoperative (mean 77.3, range 40-100) AOFAS scores (p<0.001). The patients were able to tip toe on 12 of the 18 operated feet and 9 of the 13 patients were satisfied from the operation. All dissatisfied patients had a coexistent hallux valgus deformity.

CONCLUSIONS

The technique had satisfactory midterm outcomes in older patients with advanced hallux rigidus without hallux valgus. Advantages of the method are the preservation of tip toe function in most patients and a technically easy conversion to fusion when needed.

Outcomes of the Distal Metatarsal Dorsiflexion Osteotomy for Advanced Hallux Rigidus

BACKGROUND

Hallux rigidus can be treated using several different methods and the best treatment option depends on the severity of degenerative changes of the metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint. However, the ideal operative option for advanced hallux rigidus remains debatable. This prospective study was performed to evaluate the intermediate-term clinical outcomes of distal metatarsal osteotomy used as a joint-preserving method for the treatment of advanced hallux rigidus.

METHODS

Forty-two cases (39 patients) were followed for more than 3 years after distal metatarsal dorsiflexion osteotomy for advanced hallux rigidus of grade III-IV. Clinical evaluations included the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores, Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) scores, and patient subjective satisfaction scores. Range of motion (ROM) of great toe, complications, reoperation rates, width of the MTP joint space, and times to union were evaluated.

RESULTS

Mean AOFAS hallux and mean FAAM scores significantly improved from 56.4 and 61.2 points preoperatively to 87.6 and 88.7 points at final follow-up, respectively ( P < .001). Grade III and IV groups had significantly different AOFAS and FAAM scores at final follow-up. Mean dorsiflexion of great toe significantly improved from 14.8° preoperatively to 35.5° at final follow-up ( P < .001). Mean patient satisfaction score at final follow-up was 92.8 points. There were 4 cases (9.5%) of subsequent fusion and 2 cases (4.8%) of transfer metatarsalgia.

CONCLUSIONS

Distal metatarsal dorsiflexion osteotomy using bio-compression screws appears to be an effective operative option for grade III advanced hallux rigidus with viable cartilage on >50% of the first metatarsal articular surface, as it restored joint motion, provided reliable pain relief, and did not require implant removal. However, based on the unsatisfactory clinical results and the high rate of reoperation observed, the authors cannot recommend this operative method for the treatment of end-stage (grade IV) hallux rigidus.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, prospective case series.

Autogenous capsular interpositional arthroplasty surgery for painful hallux rigidus: assessing changes in range of motion and postoperative foot health

The autogenous capsular interpositional arthroplasty procedure can be a motion-sparing alternative to arthrodesis for the treatment of recalcitrant hallux rigidus deformity. Previous studies have reported positive results; however, many had small samples or lacked comparable preoperative measures. The present study used a prospective cohort study to assess the benefit of this technique for increasing range of motion, and comparative data to assess the reduction of pain and improvements in perceived foot health status for a consecutively drawn sample of patients. Thirty-four patients (44 feet) reviewed using a long-arm goniometer at a mean of 3.75 years after surgery experienced a significant increase in dorsiflexion (preoperative mean 11.09° ± 10.13°; postoperative mean 26.64° ± 10.07°; p < .001); plantar flexion remained unchanged. Additionally, 15 of 17 patients for whom the hallux abductus angle was initially greater than the normal range was within the normal range postoperatively. The postoperative patient perceptions of foot pain were significantly better than those from a comparable sample of patients presenting for a surgical opinion (t[69] = 6.80), just as were the perceptions of foot function, foot health, and footwear comfort (p < .001 for all). The postoperative perceptions of foot pain were comparable with the postoperative results from a range of previously published studies. These results have shown, with improvements in range of motion and reduction in pain, that autogenous capsular interpositional arthroplasty is a useful, motion-sparing technique in the treatment of painful hallux rigidus and should be considered for classification as a clinical practice guideline.

Osteochondral distal metatarsal allograft reconstruction: a case series and surgical technique

BACKGROUND

Painful degenerative diseases of the metatarsophalangeal joints (MTPJs) are frequently progressive and difficult to treat. Traditional operative treatments such as debridement, distal metatarsal osteotomies, and arthroplasty present a unique set of complications, and pain and deformity may still occur. Osteochondral distal metatarsal allograft reconstruction (ODMAR) is presented as a salvage procedure, reserved for patients with significant bone loss or avascular necrosis in whom traditional interventions have failed or are inadequate to address the underlying joint deformity.

METHODS

A retrospective review identified all ODMAR cases performed by the senior author over the past 10 years. Patient symptoms, satisfaction, and MTPJ range of motion were measured at each postoperative evaluation. Graft healing and subsequent degenerative changes at the MTPJ were observed at each visit with foot radiographs. The surgical techniques for both first and lesser metatarsal reconstructions are described.

RESULTS

Six patients were identified with average follow-up interval of 36 months (range, 6-66). Preoperative diagnoses included infection (1), fracture (1), and avascular necrosis (4). Mean total arc of motion was 40 degrees (range, 30-50). All patients maintained viability of the allograft metatarsal head and joint space was normal or Kellgren-Lawrence grade 1 in 5 of 6 patients at final follow-up. All patients demonstrated osseous union of the metatarsal osteotomy site. No patients have undergone revision surgery to date.

CONCLUSIONS

ODMAR is a safe and effective procedure for treatment of painful, degenerative conditions of the MTPJs. Further studies are required to determine the definitive indications and long-term outcomes for this procedure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective case series.

Evidence-based analysis of the efficacy for operative treatment of hallux rigidus

BACKGROUND

The aim of this article is to provide an evidence-based literature review and assessment of the quality of literature regarding operative interventions for hallux rigidus.

METHODS

A comprehensive evidence-based literature review of the PubMed database was conducted on June 24, 2011, identifying 586 articles, of which 135 were relevant in assessing the efficacy of common operative interventions for hallux rigidus. The 135 studies were then assigned a level of evidence (I-V) to denote quality. They were then reviewed to provide a grade of recommendation (A-C, I) in support of or against the operative intervention in treatment of hallux rigidus.

RESULTS

Based on the results of this evidence-based review, there is fair evidence (grade B) in support of arthrodesis for treatment of hallux rigidus. There is poor evidence (grade C) in support of cheilectomy, osteotomy, implant arthroplasty, resection arthroplasty, and interpositional arthroplasty for treatment of hallux rigidus. There is insufficient evidence (grade I) for cheilectomy with osteotomy for treatment of hallux rigidus.

CONCLUSION

There are no consistent findings in comparative studies that are properly powered with validated and appropriate outcome measures to allow any definitive conclusions on which procedure is best. However, the grade B recommendation assigned to arthrodesis may make it the logical leading candidate for future high-quality randomized controlled trials. Clearly, further studies-ideally, high-quality Level I randomized controlled trials with validated outcome measures-are needed to allow stronger recommendations to be made.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, systematic review.

A multicenter retrospective review of outcomes for arthrodesis, hemi-metallic joint implant, and resectional arthroplasty in the surgical treatment of end-stage hallux rigidus

This is a retrospective, multicenter study examining the long-term results for the treatment of end-stage hallux rigidus using 3 different surgical procedures. A total of 158 subjects (105 females and 53 males) were included in the present study. They had undergone 1 of the following surgical procedures: arthrodesis, hemi-implant, or resectional arthroplasty. The long-term results for the subjective assessment of pain, function, and alignment, as well as objective radiographic and physical findings, were examined. The median interval to postoperative follow-up for the 3 procedure groups was 159 weeks. No statistically significant difference was found in age or the number of subjects included in the 3 treatment groups (p = .11 and p = .16, respectively). The body mass index was significantly different statistically among the 3 treatment groups, with the hemi-implant group representing a smaller body mass index compared with the other procedures (p = .007). No statistically significant difference was found in the subjective outcomes among the 3 treatment groups using the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons' First Metatarsophalangeal Joint and First Ray Scoring Scale (patient questionnaire) or the modified Hallux Metatarsophalangeal-Interphalangeal Scale of the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (p = .64 and p = .14, respectively). Furthermore, the correlation coefficient between the 2 subjective scoring scales was 0.78, statistically significant and reflecting a moderate to high correlation (p < .001). The results of the radiographic and clinical evaluation revealed that metatarsalgia was the most common finding for the arthrodesis group (9.8%), bony overgrowth into the joint for the hemi-implant group (28.3%), and floating hallux for the resectional arthroplasty group (30.9%). The results of our study suggest that all 3 surgical procedures are viable options for the treatment of end-stage hallux rigidus.

Hallux IP arthritis after MP arthrodesis managed with interpositional arthroplasty of MP joint and IP fusion: case report

Level of Evidence: V, Expert Opinion

Gelfoam first metatarsophalangeal replacement/interposition arthroplasty--a case series with functional outcomes

Reported below are the functional results of a case-series of Gelfoam®-based first metatarsophalangeal total joint replacements using an interposition arthroplasty technique carried out between April 1997 and December 2007. All patients who underwent Gelfoam-based arthroplasty under the care of a single surgeon were included; outcome scores and complications were recorded. A total of 31 joints in 31 consecutive patients were followed for a mean duration of 64 (range 24-150) months, and the mean patient age at the time of operation was 48±9 (range 35-80) years. Hallux rigidus was the primary diagnosis in all of the cases except one in which a failed chevron ostetomy was the indication for treatment. The mean American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society Hallux-Metatarsophalangeal-Interphalangeal score increased from an average of 35 pre-operatively to an average of 74 at final follow-up (range 67-100), with 20 (64.5%) joints rated good to excellent. One (3.5%) joint was fused 6 months after the arthroplasty procedure. Based on these results, we concluded that first MTPJ total joint Gelfoam™-based interpostion arthroplasty is a cheap alternative to other joint replacement systems for the MTP joint. The results appear similar to those achieved using more expensive devices.

First metatarsophalangeal joint interpositional arthroplasty using a meniscus allograft for the treatment of advanced hallux rigidus: surgical technique and short-term results

Hallux rigidus is a progressive disorder of the first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint. The disorder is characterized by a loss of range of motion, degenerative changes, and pain within the joint. In later stages of the disease, the surgical procedure of choice is arthrodesis of the joint. Recently, salvage procedures of the first MTP joint using soft tissue interposition has gained popularity. In this retrospective review of 12 patients (13 total procedures) who had late-stage hallux rigidus, we evaluated the effectiveness of a newly proposed salvage procedure using a cadaver meniscus allograft for interposition. First MTP joint dorsiflexion improved from 15.77° (range, 5° -30°) preoperatively to 47.77° (range, 40° -57°; P < .0001). AOFAS (American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society) scores improved from 52.54 points (range, 35-69 points) preoperatively to 90.01 points (range, 82-95 points; P < .0001), with all patients showing improvement. The mean length of follow-up for this study was 16.46 months (range, 5-26 months) with no complications being recorded. The results show that cadaver meniscus allograft interposition is a viable procedure for end-stage hallux rigidus.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

therapeutic, level III: retrospective review.

Surgical treatment of advanced hallux rigidus by interpositional arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

While arthrodesis is the gold-standard for end-stage hallux rigidus, it leads to loss of mobility. The purpose of this paper was to report our clinical results with modified interpositional arthroplasty for the treatment of advanced (Grade III and IV of Coughlin and Shurnas) hallux rigidus.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty-five feet with Grade III and IV hallux rigidus underwent cheilectomy, minimal proximal phalanx resection (modified Keller) and interposition of the dorsal capsule and EHB.

RESULTS

At a minimum followup of 15 months, the mean postoperative hallux AOFAS score was 93.6 points with a pain subscore of 36.4 (maximum, 40 points) and functional subscore of 42.5 (maximum, 45 points). Subjectively, patients were completely satisfied with the surgical outcome in 75% of the cases.

CONCLUSION

The modified interpositional arthroplasty was a feasible surgical option to address advanced hallux rigidus in middle aged patients.

Hallux rigidus: what lies beyond fusion, resectional arthroplasty, and implants

Hallux rigidus (HR) is the limitation of motion at the first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint, most commonly secondary to degenerative arthritis. Surgical options for treating HR include 2 general categories: joint salvage and joint destruction. A hybrid of techniques from the 2 categories has emerged: cartilage resurfacing, interpositional arthroplasty, and arthrodiastasis. These procedures address the pathologic condition of the first MTP joint more directly than joint salvage and avoid many of the negative complications, consequences, and connotations of joint destruction procedures. Alternative surgical options for the treatment of recalcitrant pain associated with HR are evolving and are discussed in this review.

Multiplanar phalangeal and metatarsal osteotomies for hallux rigidus

Many articles have been published on the various treatments of hallux rigidus/limitus but few, if any, have focused solely on the osteotomies performed in the treatment of this disorder and provided a thorough review of the literature and critique of the procedures. Here, we describe the most commonly used, most widely accepted, and most effective osteotomies in the treatment of hallux limitus/rigidus. Along with this discussion are figures and tables to make the information accessible and user friendly. Among the procedures discussed are Keller arthroplasty, Keller interpositional arthroplasty, Bonney-Kessel, Mayo-Stone, Regnauld, Youngswick, Watermann, Watermann-Green, tricorrectional metatarsal osteotomy, sagittal V, LADO (long-arm decompression osteotomy), Drago, Lambrinudi (plantarflexory closing base wedge osteotomy), sagittal Scarf/sagittal Z, and Weil/Mau/distal oblique osteotomy.

Quantitative review of operative management of hallux rigidus

INTRODUCTION

Surgical techniques for the management of hallux rigidus include cheilectomy, Keller resection arthroplasty, arthrodesis, Silastic implantation, phalangeal or metatarsal osteotomy, capsular arthroplasty, partial or total joint replacement, interposition arthroplasty. However, the optimal management is controversial.

SOURCES OF DATA

We performed a comprehensive search of CINAHL, Embase, Medline and the Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials, from inception of the database to 2 November 2010. Sixty-nine articles published in peer reviewed journals were included in this comprehensive review.

AREAS OF AGREEMENT

Cheilectomy and first metatarsal or phalangeal corrective osteotomy may provide better outcome for patients with early and intermediate hallux rigidus (Stages I-II), while arthrodesis or arthroplasty are indicated to manage more severe conditions. The Coleman Methodology Score showed great heterogeneity in terms of study design, patient characteristics, management methods and outcome assessment and generally low methodological quality.

AREAS OF CONTROVERSY

Definitive conclusions on the use of these techniques for routine management of patients with hallux rigidus are not possible. Given the limitations of the published literature, especially the extensive clinical heterogeneity, it is not possible to compare outcomes of patients undergoing different surgical procedures and determine clear guidelines.

GROWING POINTS

To assess whether benefits from surgery, validated and standardized measures should be used to compare the outcomes of patients undergoing standard surgical procedures.

RESEARCH

There is a need to perform appropriately powered randomized clinical trials of using standard diagnostic assessment, common and validated scoring system comparing reported outcomes and duration of follow-up >2 years.

The need for surgical revision after isolated cheilectomy for hallux rigidus: a systematic review

Isolated cheilectomy has been proposed for treatment of hallux rigidus due to the perceived safety, efficacy, and ability to revise with repeat cheilectomy, implant or interpositional arthroplasty, or arthrodesis. A systematic review was undertaken to better understand the need for surgical revision after isolated cheilectomy for hallux rigidus. Studies were eligible for inclusion only if they involved consecutively enrolled patients undergoing isolated cheilectomy or involved revision surgery of the first metatarsophalangeal joint after isolated cheilectomy, evaluated patients at mean follow-up > or = 12 months' duration, and included details of complications. Twenty-three studies, describing 706 cheilectomies, met the inclusion criteria, with 62 (8.8%) undergoing surgical revision in the form of arthrodesis (n = 23), no mention of revision procedure (n = 17), interpositional arthroplasty (n = 13), silicone implant arthroplasty (n = 4), Keller resection arthroplasty (n = 3), or repeat cheilectomy (n = 2). Twelve studies specified the grade of hallux rigidus as: 103 (19.9%) grade 1, 210 (40.6%) grade II, 189 (36.6%) grade III, and 15 (2.9%) grade IV. Six studies indicated the number of cheilectomies that required revision surgery as: 2 (20%) grade I, 8 (14.8%) grade II, 12 (9.1%) grade III, and 5 (55.6%) grade IV. These results make clear the low incidence of revision surgery after cheilectomy for hallux rigidus. Therefore, cheilectomy should be considered a first-line surgical treatment for hallux rigidus. There remains a need for methodologically sound prospective cohort studies that focus on the use of cheilectomy for specific grades of hallux rigidus.

Outcome following autogenous soft tissue interpositional arthroplasty for end-stage hallux rigidus: a systematic review

Autogenous soft tissue interpositional arthroplasty has been proposed as an alternative to arthrodesis and other forms of arthroplasty for treatment of end-stage hallux rigidus because of the perceived safety and efficacy. The author undertook a systematic review of electronic databases and other relevant sources to identify material relating to the outcomes following autogenous soft tissue interpositional arthroplasty for end-stage hallux rigidus. Information from peer-reviewed journals, as well as from non-peer-reviewed publications, abstracts and posters, textbooks, and unpublished works, were also considered. In an effort to procure the highest quality studies available, studies were eligible for inclusion only if they involved consecutively enrolled patients undergoing isolated autogenous soft tissue interpositional arthroplasty for the treatment of end-stage hallux rigidus, evaluated patients at mean follow-up of 12-months' duration or longer, included pre- and postoperative range of motion of the first metatarsal-phalangeal joint, determined pre- and postoperative outcomes using a scoring system, and documented any complications. Two studies involving a total of 28 autogenous soft tissue interpositional arthroplasties for end-stage hallux rigidus were identified that met the inclusion criteria. There were 12 men (52%) and 11 women (48%) with a mean age of 58.2 years followed for a mean of 21.6 months. Both studies used the AOFAS First Metatarsal-Phalangeal-Hallux Scoring System, which had a mean of 26.0 preoperatively rising to 89.4 postoperatively. First metatarsal-phalangeal joint dorsiflexion had a mean of 16.7 degrees preoperatively rising to 51.1 degrees postoperatively. Complications occurred in 4 (14.3%) feet and no feet required surgical revision. The results of this systematic review demonstrate improvement in patient outcomes and first metatarsal-phalangeal joint dorsiflexion, as well as few complications following autogenous soft tissue interpositional arthroplasty for end-stage hallux rigidus. However, there is still a need for methodologically sound prospective cohort studies that compare autogenous soft tissue interpositional arthroplasty with other forms of arthroplasty and arthrodesis for end-stage hallux rigidus.