Clinical Utility of MBDA Panel in the Management of Adult Onset Still's Disease

Adult-Onset Still's Disease-A Complex Disease, a Challenging Treatment

Adult-onset Still's disease (AOSD) is a systemic inflammatory disorder with an unknown cause characterized by high-spiking fever, lymphadenopathy, hepatosplenomegaly, hyperferritinemia, and leukocytosis. The clinical course can be divided into three significant patterns, each with a different prognosis: Self-limited or monophasic, intermittent or polycyclic systemic, and chronic articular. Two criteria sets have been validated. The Yamaguchi criteria are the most generally used, although the Fautrel criteria offer the benefit of adding ferritin and glycosylated ferritin values. AOSD's pathogenesis is not yet completely understood. Chemokines and pro-inflammatory cytokines, including interferon (IFN)-γ, tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα), interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6, IL-8, and IL-18, play a crucial role in the progression of illness, resulting in the development of innovative targeted therapeutics. There are no treatment guidelines for AOSD due to its rarity, absence of controlled research, and lack of a standard definition for remission and therapy objectives. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), corticosteroids (CS), and conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) are used in AOSD treatment. Biological therapy, including IL-1, IL-6, IL-18, and IL-17 inhibitors, as well as TNFα or Janus-kinases (JAKs) inhibitors, is administered to patients who do not react to CS and csDMARDs or achieve an inadequate response.

Update on the therapy of adult-onset Still's disease with a focus on IL-1-inhibition: a systematic review

Introduction:

The past decade has seen increasingly rapid advances in understanding the pathogenic nature of adult-onset Still’s disease (AOSD) and its shared symptoms with the systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA). Interleukin-1 (IL-1) blocking agents are key elements in the treatment. In this updated systematic review, we focus on studies on efficacy and safety of IL-1 blockers published in the past 5 years and review on latest available therapies.

Methods:

We conducted searches using Medline, Biosis, Embase, and Cochrane databases between 2016 and 2021 using the terms AOSD, IL1, IL-18, canakinumab, anakinra, tadekinig, and rilonacept and if applicable their trade names. Duplicates, case reports, and manuscripts with incomplete data were excluded.

Results:

Of the 1013 screened publications, 17 were eligible after careful selection. We only found two published randomized controlled studies in the past 5 years. Review manuscripts of rare diseases, like our work, usually rely on retrospective studies and case series. Anakinra and canakinumab can be successfully used as first- or further-line treatment in patients with AOSD refractory to steroids. A homogeneous outcome is not established yet. Thus, a combination of clinical and laboratory tests can support the experienced clinician in the decision-making process.

Conclusion:

The approval of IL-1 inhibitors for AOSD brought us into a new era in the treatment of AOSD. The overall efficacy-safety profile of the IL-1 inhibitors is favorable reflecting a targeted approach as standard of care. We can expect that the successful treatment of AOSD with IL-1 inhibition will facilitate further clinical and basic research with impact on other auto-inflammatory and hyper-inflammatory conditions.

Autoantibody Discovery, Assay Development and Adoption: Death Valley, the Sea of Survival and Beyond

Dating to the discovery of the Lupus Erythematosus (LE) cell in 1948, there has been a dramatic growth in the discovery of unique autoantibodies and their cognate targets, all of which has led to the availability and use of autoantibody testing for a broad spectrum of autoimmune diseases. Most studies of the sensitivity, specificity, commutability, and harmonization of autoantibody testing have focused on widely available, commercially developed and agency-certified autoantibody kits. However, this is only a small part of the spectrum of autoantibody tests that are provided through laboratories world-wide. This manuscript will review the wider spectrum of testing by exploring the innovation pathway that begins with autoantibody discovery followed by assessment of clinical relevance, accuracy, validation, and then consideration of regulatory requirements as an approved diagnostic test. Some tests are offered as "Research Use Only (RUO)", some as "Laboratory Developed Tests (LDT)", some enter Health Technology Assessment (HTA) pathways, while others are relegated to a "death valley" of autoantibody discovery and become "orphan" autoantibodies. Those that achieve regulatory approval are further threatened by the business world's "Darwinian Sea of Survival". As one example of the trappings of autoantibody progression or failure, it is reported that more than 200 different autoantibodies have been described in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), a small handful (~10%) of these have achieved regulatory approval and are widely available as commercial diagnostic kits, while a few others may be available as RUO or LDT assays. However, the vast majority (90%) are orphaned and languish in an autoantibody 'death valley'. This review proposes that it is important to keep an inventory of these "orphan autoantibodies" in 'death valley' because, with the increasing availability of multi-analyte arrays and artificial intelligence (MAAI), some can be rescued to achieve a useful role in clinical diagnostic especially in light of patient stratification and precision medicine.