Methylation of Glutathione-S-Transferase P1 Promotor in Egyptian Females with Breast Cancer

Potential epigenetic modifications implicated in triple- to quadruple-negative breast cancer transition: a review

Current research on triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has resulted in delineation into the quadruple-negative breast cancer (QNBC) subgroup. Epigenetic modifications such as DNA methylation, histone posttranslational modifications and associated changes in chromatin architecture have been implicated in breast cancer pathogenesis. Herein, the authors highlight genes with observed epigenetic modifications that are associated with more aggressive TNBC/QNBC pathogenesis and possible interventions. Advanced literature searches were done on PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus and Google Scholar. The results suggest that nine epigenetically altered genes/differentially expressed proteins in addition to the downregulated androgen receptor are associated with TNBC aggressiveness and could be implicated in the TNBC to QNBC transition. Thus, restoring the normal expression of these genes via epigenetic reprogramming could be therapeutically beneficial to TNBC and QNBC patients.

Glutathione S transferase T1 gene polymorphism and its promoter methylation are associated with breast cancer susceptibility in Egyptian women

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer (BC) is one of the leading causes of cancer mortality in women. Glutathione S-transferase (GSTT1) is involved in activation of detoxification reactions and catalysis of chemicals conjugation with glutathione. GSTT1 genotype is a limiting factor for some environmental diseases. Epigenetic changes have an essential role in BC through inappropriate interaction between genomic and environmental risk factors.

AIM

This study was directed to explore the association of BC risk with GSTT1 genetic variations and its methylation status in Egyptian women.

DESIGN AND METHODS

This study included 100 healthy women as the control group and 100 patients were clinically and histologically diagnosed with breast cancer. All blood samples were used for genomic DNA extraction. GSTT1 genotyping was accomplished by multiplex PCR and methylation-specific PCR was used to analyze the GSTT1 promoter methylation status.

RESULTS

Breast cancer patients showed significant incidence of null GSTT1 in relation to controls (p = 0.004). GSTT1 gene promoter methylation status showed significant difference between hypermethylated and unmethylated patients when compared with healthy subjects (p = 0.005). GSTT1 promoter methylation status was not significantly associated with null genotype. There was no significant association between GSTT1-null genotypes and BC stage in cases with or without family history, but for promotor methylation, there was significant association with stage III and IV breast cancer disease.

CONCLUSION

GSTT1 null genetic variant and promoter hypermethylation in the GSTT region of the gene may be considered as critical risk factors for BC in Egyptian women.