Adverse Effects of Busulfan Plus Cyclophosphamide versus Busulfan Plus Fludarabine as Conditioning Regimens for Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplantation

Busulfan-Based and Treosulfan-Based Myeloablative Conditioning for Allogeneic Transplantation in Children with Thalassemia Major: a Single-Center Experience From Southern Turkey

OBJECTIVES

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant is the only curative treatment for patients with transfusion-dependent thalassemia major. In recent years, a number of novel approaches have improved patient outcomes and quality of life by minimizing the toxicity of conditioning regimens. The objective of this study was to compare the role of treosulfan- and busulfan-based conditioning in transfusion-dependent thalassemia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data were collected retrospectively on 121 children with beta thalassemia major who underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplant using treosulfan-based (n = 37) or busulfan-based (n = 84) conditioning regimens between 2012 and 2022.

RESULTS

Two-year overall survival was 87.5% in the busulfan-based conditioning group and 91.1% in the treosulfan-based conditioning group.The group given the busulfan regimen compared with treosulfan regimen had significantly increased number of side effects (58.3% vs 21.6%, respectively; P < .001). When the busulfan-based regimen by level was evaluated, we observed no significant differences between the frequency of side effects according to drug serum levels. In addition, no significant differences were shown between the 2 regimen groups for cumulative incidence of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease.

CONCLUSIONS

The safety and effectiveness of a treosulfan-based myeloablative conditioning regimen has been confirmed by ourretrospective investigation of pediatric patients with beta thalassemia.

Allogeneic stem cell transplant for multiple myeloma & myelofibrosis with split-dose busulfan, fludarabine & cyclophosphamide

Allogeneic stem cell transplant can have high morbidity and mortality in patients with myelofibrosis (MF) and multiple myeloma (MM). This phase 2 study used a novel myeloablative regimen of split-dose busulfan, fludarabine, and then post-transplant cyclophosphamide. Four patients with MF and 2 with MM were enrolled. At 1 year, non-relapse mortality was 33.3%, and overall survival was 50%. Incidence of acute and chronic GVHD was 33.3% and 16.7%, respectively. Those surviving beyond 1 year (MF = 1, MM = 2) had durable remissions with a median follow-up of 42 months. This small study demonstrates relative safety & favorable key outcomes using this novel approach.