Segmental Lordosis of the Spondylolytic Vertebrae in Adolescent Lumbar Spondylolysis: Differences between Bilateral L5 and L4 Spondylolysis

Effect of lumbar lordosis angle on the development of lumbar spondylolysis in adolescent baseball players: A cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Lumbar spondylolysis (LS) is a lumbar vertebral arch stress fracture that often occurs in adolescent athletes, especially baseball players. An increase in lumbar lordosis angle (LLA) increases the compressive stress on the vertebral arch, influencing the development of LS. However, the effect of LLA on LS development in adolescent baseball players is unknown. Therefore, it is necessary to elucidate the risk factors that influence the development of LS. This cross-sectional study aimed investigate the effect of LLA on LS development in adolescent baseball players.

METHODS

Patients were male baseball players aged 11-18 years who visited an orthopedic clinic with a chief complaint of lumbar pain and underwent a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination between January 1, 2018, and October 31, 2021. LLA was defined as the angle formed by the line parallel to the superior endplate of the L1 and S1. A person other than the data analyst measured LLA three times from the MRI, and the average value was used for data analysis. Logistic regression analysis was performed, with the presence or absence of LS as the objective variable and LLA, age, and previous pitching experience as explanatory variables.

RESULTS

Of the 112 subjects included, 79 were in the LS group and 33 in the non-LS group. The LLA was 45.42 ± 8.19° in the LS group and 36.68 ± 8.26° in the non-LS group, with significant differences between the groups. Logistic regression analysis showed that LLA significantly differed with an odds ratio of 1.140 (95% confidence interval: 1.070-1.21), even after adjusting for age and previous pitching experience.

CONCLUSIONS

LLA in adolescent baseball players was significantly greater in the LS group than in the non-LS group, which may influence the development of LS.

Optimal cutoff point of vertebral body cross-sectional area as a morphological parameter for predicting lumbar spondylolysis

The relationship between vertebral body cross-sectional area (VBCSA) and spinal conditions associated with increased lumbar lordosis, such as lumbar spondylolysis (LSL), is not known. We investigated the morphological parameter, VBCSA, to predict LSL. The VBCSA on MRI has not been studied for its association with LSL. We hypothesized that VBCSA is an important morphological parameter for LSL prediction. We collected VBCSA data from 90 patients (43 males and 47 females) with LSL and 91 control subjects (44 males and 47 females) who underwent lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging (LS-MRI). Axial T2-weighted LS-MRI images were obtained from all participants. Using our picture archiving and communications system, we analyzed the VBCSA at the level of the L5 vertebral body by utilizing MRI. The average VBCSA was 2263.51 ± 306.02 mm2 in the male control group and 1820.92 ± 224.89 mm2 in the male LSL group. LSL patients had significantly lower VBCSAs (P < .001) than did the male controls. The average VBCSA was 1985.21 ± 258.05 mm2 in the female control group and 1553.73 ± 250.02 mm2 in the female LSL group, and the LSL patients also had significantly lower VBCSAs (P < .001) than did the female controls. The optimal VBCSA cutoff value in the male group was 2014.69 mm2 with 76.7% sensitivity, 75.0% specificity, and an area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.82-0.95). In the female group, the optimal cutoff score was 1814.11 mm2 with 76.6% sensitivity, 76.6% specificity, and an AUC of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.82-0.95). VBCSA is a sensitive objective morphological parameter for assessing LSL, and a lower VBCSA is associated with a higher possibility of LSL. We believe that these results will be useful in diagnostic radiology for evaluating patients with LSL.

Impact of Individual Spinopelvic Anatomy on the Localization and Severity of Symptomatic Isthmic Spondylolisthesis

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data.

OBJECTIVES

Isthmic spondylolisthesis (iSPL) occurs most commonly in L5/S1 and L4/5. This study investigates the association between spinopelvic anatomy and the pathogenesis of iSPL.

METHODS

Spinopelvic parameters as well as severity of slip grade were measured in sagittal spine radiographs of symptomatic patients with iSPL in segments L4/5 and L5/S1. Means were calculated and differences between both groups were analyzed. A correlation between the analyzed parameters and degree of slippage was performed.

RESULTS

We included 73 subjects in this study; 11 in L4/5 group and 62 in L5/S1 group. Pelvic anatomy significantly differed between L4/5 and L5/S1 iSPL (Pelvic Incidence (PI) 54.8° vs 66.3°, P value = .006; Pelvic Radius (PR) 124.4 mm vs 137.4 mm; P value = .005 and Sacral Table Angle (STA) 101.0° vs 92.2°, P value < .001). The relative degree of slippage was significantly higher in the L5/S1 group (L4/5 29.1% vs L5/S1 40.1%, P value .022). We also observed a significant correlation between pelvic anatomy and the severity of the slip in iSPL at the L5/S1 level.

CONCLUSIONS

Pelvic parameters PI and STA play an important role concerning the level of occurrence and severity of iSPL. Spinopelvic anatomy determines the pathogenesis of iSPL.

Spine Alignment in Standing and Maximal Upper Limb Elevation in Baseball Players with Lumbar Spondylolysis and Those without Low Back Pain

The changes in lumbar lordosis angle (LL) and sacral slope angle (SS) related to upper limb elevation and thoracic kyphosis angle (TK) in baseball players with spondylolysis remain unclear. Herein, we investigated baseball players with spondylolysis and those without low back pain, comparing LL and SS with upper limb elevation within and between groups and TK between groups. Baseball players with spondylolysis were enrolled as subjects, and baseball players without low back pain were enrolled as controls (n = 8 each). X-rays were obtained in the standing position and with maximal elevation position of the upper limb (elevation position). LL and SS were measured in the standing and elevated positions, and TK was measured in the standing position. LL was significantly larger in individuals with spondylolysis than controls. The SS of the control group was significantly larger in the elevated position than in the standing position, while the SS of the spondylolysis group was not significantly different between positions. SS was significantly larger in the spondylolysis group than in the control group, only in the standing position. Physical therapy for spondylolysis should focus on hyperlordosis alignment in the standing and maximal elevation positions of both upper limbs, sacral hyper-slope alignment in the standing position, and decreased sacral slope motion.

Comparison of alignment and spondylolysis fracture angle in bilateral and unilateral spondylolysis

OBJECTIVES

Spondylolysis occurs bilaterally or unilaterally and bilateral spondylolysis increases the risk of developing isthmic spondylolisthesis. The characteristics of the lumbar lordosis angle (LLA), sacral slope angle (SSA), and spondylolysis fracture angle (SFA) in bilateral spondylolysis compared with those in unilateral spondylolysis have not been clarified. The purpose of this study was to compare the LLA, SSA, and SFA of bilateral and unilateral spondylolysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-eight patients with lumbar spondylolysis who visited our clinic for an initial visit and 15 age-matched patients with a chief complaint of low back pain were included as controls. Computed tomography films were used to classify all spondylolysis patients into two groups: those with bilateral fractures (bilateral) and those with unilateral fractures (unilateral). The LLA and SSA were measured using lateral X-ray films and the SFA was measured using computed tomography films.

RESULTS

The LLA was significantly higher in all spondylolysis patients than in the control group (p = .026). There was no significant difference in SSA between the spondylolysis and control groups (p = .28). The LLA was significantly higher in the bilateral group than in the unilateral group (p = .018). There was no significant difference in SSA between the bilateral and unilateral groups (p = .15). The SFA was significantly lower in the bilateral group than in the unilateral group (p = .024).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that physical therapy for spondylolysis may be considered bilaterally and unilaterally.

Sacropelvic Parameters and L5 Spondylolysis: Computed Tomography Analysis

Study Design

Retrospective analysis of computed tomography scans.

Purpose

This study aims to determine the association of sagittal sacropelvic parameters with L5 spondylolysis.

Overview of Literature

The association of increased pelvic incidence (PI) and decreased sacral table angle (STA) with spondylolysis has been reported, but no study has simultaneously analyzed multiple sacropelvic variables to compare their association.

Methods

In this study, computed tomography scans obtained to assess major trauma in patients aged >16 years were analyzed. Scans meeting one of the following criteria were excluded: abnormal anatomy, previous spine or hip/pelvis surgery, or spinal pathology, including deformity, infection, tumor, or trauma. sacral anatomic orientation (SAO), PI, pelvic thickness (PTH), femoro-sacral posterior angle (FSPA), STA, and sacral kyphosis (SK) were measured.

Results

Overall, 202 scans were analyzed: 25 with L5 spondylolysis and 177 normal. Among the groups, a significant difference was observed in SAO (43.3° vs. 51.6°), PI (61.7° vs. 49.8°), STA (95.4° vs. 101.8°), and SK (31.0° vs. 23.7°). Based on the logistic regression analysis, only PI (odds ratio [OR], 1.074; 95% CI, 1.026–1.124) and STA (OR, 0.822; 95% CI, 0.734–0.920) remained significant predictors for the presence of spondylolysis. In the spondylolysis group, PI correlated significantly with PTH (r=−0.589), FSPA (r=0.880), and SK (r=0.576), whereas in the normal group, PI correlated significantly with FSPA (r=0.781) and SK (r=0.728).

Conclusions

By simultaneously assessing multiple sacropelvic parameters, we associated increasing PI with L5 spondylolysis. Decreasing STA, which likely represents a chronic remodeling secondary to spondylolysis, was also associated with increased risk. Back pain in an adolescent or young adult with high PI or low STA should raise suspicion of a possible occult spondylolysis.