Short communication: presynchronization for timed artificial insemination in grazing dairy cows by using progesterone for 14 days with or without prostaglandin F2α at the time of progesterone withdrawal

Changes in body condition score from calving to first insemination and milk yield, pregnancy per AI, and pregnancy loss in lactating dairy cows: A meta-analysis

We determined the association of body condition score (BCS) at calving, at first postpartum artificial insemination (AI), and change in BCS between calving and first AI on pregnancy per AI (P/AI) at 30-45 d, pregnancy loss to 60-85 d, and milk yield in lactating dairy cows. Outcome data were included from 15 studies and 47 herd-year combinations. Additional variables included season of AI, herd, days in milk at first AI, parity, and of mean daily milk yield within 2 wk of first AI. The BCS scale employed was a standard 1-5 scale (1 = severe under conditioning or emaciated and 5 = severe over conditioning) with 0.25 cut points. Presynchronization treatments that included PGF_2α and GnRH increased (P < 0.05) the proportion of cows with luteal function before AI compared with PGF_2α alone. Compared with no presynchronization treatment those that included PGF_2α or PGF_2α and GnRH increased (P < 0.05) first P/AI. Cows having BCS ≥2.75 at AI had greater (P < 0.01) first P/AI than cows with BCS <2.75. As BCS at first AI increased, P/AI increased in a linear (P = 0.04) fashion and was greater in cows expressing estrus when BCS at AI was <2.50. Presynchronization had no association with P/AI for cows with BCS at calving <3.00 compared with those with BCS ≥3.00. In contrast, multiparous cows tended (P = 0.06) to have greater P/AI when they calved with BCS ≥3.00 compared with <3.00. Increasing BCS at AI was associated with decreased (P = 0.01) pregnancy loss. Pregnancy per AI did not differ among cows according to the magnitude of prebreeding BCS loss, but more multiparous cows losing more than 0.5 units of BCS tended to have greater pregnancy losses in second-parity cows (P = 0.09) and in cows of third or greater (P < 0.001) parity. Daily milk yields at first AI differed among parities as expected, but a parity by BCS at calving interaction was detected (P = 0.008). Daily milk yield at first AI decreased (P < 0.001) linearly as BCS at AI increased, with an exacerbated greater negative effect during summer. More prebreeding loss in BCS was associated with more (P < 0.05) milk yield in first- and second-parity cows. We concluded that greater BCS at first AI was associated with improved P/AI, but magnitude of prebreeding BCS loss was not associated with P/AI. In contrast, more pregnancy loss was associated with more prebreeding BCS loss in multiparous cows. Cow having lesser BCS at AI and greater prebreeding loss in BCS produced more milk than their herd mates of greater BCS and lesser prebreeding loss in BCS, respectively.

Relationships between fertility and postpartum changes in body condition and body weight in lactating dairy cows

The relationship between energy status and fertility in dairy cattle was retrospectively analyzed by comparing fertility with body condition score (BCS) near artificial insemination (AI; experiment 1), early postpartum changes in BCS (experiment 2), and postpartum changes in body weight (BW; experiment 3). To reduce the effect of cyclicity status, all cows were synchronized with Double-Ovsynch protocol before timed AI. In experiment 1, BCS of lactating dairy cows (n = 1,103) was evaluated near AI. Most cows (93%) were cycling at initiation of the breeding Ovsynch protocol (first GnRH injection). A lower percentage pregnant to AI (P/AI) was found in cows with lower (≤ 2.50) versus higher (≥ 2.75) BCS (40.4 vs. 49.2%). In experiment 2, lactating dairy cows on 2 commercial dairies (n = 1,887) were divided by BCS change from calving until the third week postpartum. Overall, P/AI at 70-d pregnancy diagnosis differed dramatically by BCS change and was least for cows that lost BCS, intermediate for cows that maintained BCS, and greatest for cows that gained BCS [22.8% (180/789), 36.0% (243/675), and 78.3% (331/423), respectively]. Surprisingly, a difference existed between farms with BCS change dramatically affecting P/AI on one farm and no effect on the other farm. In experiment 3, lactating dairy cows (n = 71) had BW measured weekly from the first to ninth week postpartum and then had superovulation induced using a modified Double-Ovsynch protocol. Cows were divided into quartiles (Q) by percentage of BW change (Q1 = least change; Q4 = most change) from calving until the third week postpartum. No effect was detected of quartile on number of ovulations, total embryos collected, or percentage of oocytes that were fertilized; however, the percentage of fertilized oocytes that were transferable embryos was greater for cows in Q1, Q2, and Q3 than Q4 (83.8, 75.2, 82.6, and 53.2%, respectively). In addition, percentage of degenerated embryos was least for cows in Q1, Q2, and Q3 and greatest for Q4 (9.6, 14.5, 12.6, and 35.2% respectively). In conclusion, for cows synchronized with a Double-Ovsynch protocol, an effect of low BCS (≤ 2.50) near AI on fertility was detected, but change in BCS during the first 3 wk postpartum had a more profound effect on P/AI to first timed AI. This effect could be partially explained by the reduction in embryo quality and increase in degenerate embryos byd 7 after AI in cows that lost more BW from the first to third week postpartum.

Luteal function, largest follicle, and fertility in postpartum dairy cows treated with 14dCIDR-PGF2α versus 2xPGF2α-Ovsynch for timed AI

A method for timed artificial insemination (AI) that is used for beef cows, beef heifers, and dairy heifers employs progesterone-releasing inserts, such as the controlled internal drug release (CIDR; Zoetis, New York, NY, USA) that are left in place for 14 days. The 14-day CIDR treatment is a method of presynchronization that ensures that cattle are in the late luteal phase of the estrous cycle when PGF2α is administered before timed AI. The objective of this study was to test the effectiveness of the 14dCIDR-PGF2α program in postpartum dairy cows by comparing it with the traditional "Presynch-Ovsynch" (2xPGF2α-Ovsynch) program. The 14dCIDR-PGF2α cows (n = 132) were treated with a CIDR insert on Day 0 for 14 days. At 19 days after CIDR removal (Day 33), the cows were treated with a luteolytic dose of PGF2α, 56 hours later were treated with an ovulatory dose of GnRH (Day 35), and 16 hours later were inseminated. The 2xPGF2α-Ovsynch cows were treated with a luteolytic dose of PGF2α on Day 0 and again on Day 14. At 12 days after the second PGF2α treatment (Day 26), the cows were treated with GnRH. At 7 days after GnRH, the cows were treated with PGF2α (Day 33), then 56 hours later treated with GnRH (Day 35), and then 16 hours later were inseminated. There was no effect of treatment or treatment by parity interaction on pregnancies per AI (P/AI) when pregnancy diagnosis was performed on Day 32 (115/263; 43.7%) or Days 60 to 90 (99/263; 37.6%) after insemination. There was an effect of parity (P < 0.05) on P/AI because primiparous cows had lesser P/AI (35/98; 35.7%) than multiparous cows (80/165; 48.5%) on Day 32. Cows observed in estrus after the presynchronization step (within 5 days after CIDR removal or within 5 days after the second PGF2α treatment) had greater P/AI than those not observed in estrus (55/103; 53.4% vs. 60/160; 37.5%; observed vs. not observed; P < 0.01; d 32 pregnancy diagnosis). When progesterone data were examined in a subset of cows (n = 208), 55.3% of cows had a "prototypical" response to treatment (i.e., the cow had an estrous cycle that was synchronized by the presynchronization treatment and then the cow responded appropriately to the subsequent PGF2α and GnRH treatments before timed AI). Collectively, cows with a prototypical response to either treatment had 52.2% P/AI that was greater (P < 0.001) than the P/AI for cows that had a nonprototypical response (19%) (P/AI determined at 60-90 days of pregnancy). In conclusion, we did not detect a difference in P/AI when postpartum dairy cows were treated with 14dCIDR-PGF2α or 2xPGF2α-Ovsynch before timed AI. The primary limitation to the success of either program was the failure of the cow to respond appropriately to the sequence of treatments.