Comparison of gonadotropin-releasing hormone and estradiol benzoate plus gonadotropin-releasing hormone to initiate a progesterone-based timed artificial insemination resynchronization protocol in lactating dairy cows

The present study compared 2 strategies to initiate a progesterone (P4)-based timed artificial insemination (TAI) protocol for lactating dairy cows: only GnRH or estradiol benzoate (EB) plus GnRH (EB+GnRH). Lactating Holstein cows (n = 487; 184 primiparous and 303 multiparous) from 2 commercial dairy herds were used for their second or greater services postpartum. Each week, cows that were nonpregnant at the pregnancy diagnosis 32 d after a previous AI were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 experimental groups that differed only in the strategy to initiate (d 0) the TAI protocol. On d 0, every cow received a 2.0-g P4 implant; in the EB+GnRH group, cows were treated with 2.0 mg i.m. of EB and 16.8 µg i.m. of the GnRH analog buserelin acetate, whereas in the GnRH group, cows received only 16.8 µg i.m. of GnRH. On d 7 after the initial treatment, 0.530 mg i.m. of cloprostenol sodium (PGF) was administered in all cows, followed by a second dose on d 8, concomitant with 1.0 mg i.m. of estradiol cypionate and P4 implant withdrawal. The TAI was performed on d 10 (48 h after P4 device withdrawal) in both experimental groups. Only conventional Holstein semen was used throughout the study. The percentage of cows with corpus luteum (CL) on d 0 (73%) and overall ovulation rate after d 0 (54%) did not differ between groups. The CL regression between d 0 and the first PGF treatment was greater in the EB+GnRH group than the GnRH group (42% vs. 31%). Consequently, the proportion of cows with CL at PGF was greater when only GnRH was used on d 0 compared with EB+GnRH (86% vs. 82%), and the mean number of CL at PGF was greater (1.23 vs. 1.11). The expression of estrus near TAI was greater in GnRH group (84% vs. 77%), and cows showing estrus had greater (44% vs. 10%) pregnancy per AI (P/AI) on d 32 for both treatments. We found no effect of the presence of CL on d 0 or at PGF, nor of ovulation after d 0 or CL regression between d 0 and d 7 on fertility. However, fertility was critically impaired when cows did not have CL at both times, d 0 and at PGF treatment. We did not observe any interaction between treatment and other variables, and the P/AI was similar in cows receiving EB+GnRH or only GnRH on d 0 (37.8% vs. 36.6%). In summary, although there was no detectable difference in P/AI between treatments, this study demonstrated potential negative physiological outcomes caused by EB treatment on d 0 (greater incidence of luteolysis after d 0 and fewer cows with CL at PGF treatment). Overall, we found no benefit of adding EB at the initiation of a P4-based TAI protocol on fertility compared with using GnRH alone, despite differences in ovarian dynamics and expression of estrus.

Prediction of the Spontaneous Estrus Expression Period Based on Large (≥10 mm) Follicle Numbers in Lactating Holstein Dairy Cows

The objectives of this study were (1) to investigate the distribution of large (≥10 mm) follicle numbers during the estrous cycle and (2) to compare the timing of the estrus expression period after the ovarian examination between cows with one large follicle (1F) and two or more large follicles (2F) with functional corpus luteum (CL) at the ovarian examination in lactating Holstein dairy cows. In experiment 1, we performed 393 ovarian examinations by ultrasonography, addressed the existence of CL (≥20 mm) and large follicle numbers, and classified cows into 1F (n = 229) and 2F (n = 164) groups. The 1F appearance rates were beyond 75% each day during 3 to 12 d after estrus. However, 2F appearance rates were beyond 75% each day during 15 to 24 d after estrus. In experiment 2, we performed 302 ovarian examinations by ultrasonography and classified cows into the 1F (n = 168) and 2F (n = 134) groups. Estrus detection was performed for 24 d after the ovarian examination in each cow. In the 2F group, 75% of estrus occurred within 9 d of the ovarian examination. However, 75% of estrus occurred 10 d after the ovarian examination in 1F. Days from the ovarian examination to estrus were significantly shorter in the 2F (6.0 d; median, 7.2 ± 4.0 d; mean ± SD) than in the 1F (13 d, 12.4 ± 4.3 d) group. In conclusion, focusing on ≥10 mm follicle numbers with CL could be useful for predicting the estrus expression period.

Factors That Optimize Reproductive Efficiency in Dairy Herds with an Emphasis on Timed Artificial Insemination Programs

Simple Summary

Reproductive efficiency is critical for profitability of dairy operations. The first part of this manuscript discusses the key physiology of dairy cows and how to practically manipulate this reproductive physiology to produce timed artificial insemination (TAI) programs with enhanced fertility. In addition, there are other critical factors that also influence reproductive efficiency of dairy herds such as genetics, management of the transition period, and body condition score changes and improve management and facilities to increase cow comfort and reduce health problems. Using optimized TAI protocols combined with enhancing cow/management factors that impact reproductive efficiency generates dairy herd programs with high reproductive efficiency, while improving health and productivity of the herds.

Abstract

Reproductive efficiency is closely tied to the profitability of dairy herds, and therefore successful dairy operations seek to achieve high 21-day pregnancy rates in order to reduce the calving interval and days in milk of the herd. There are various factors that impact reproductive performance, including the specific reproductive management program, body condition score loss and nutritional management, genetics of the cows, and the cow comfort provided by the facilities and management programs. To achieve high 21-day pregnancy rates, the service rate and pregnancy per artificial insemination (P/AI) should be increased. Currently, there are adjustments in timed artificial insemination (TAI) protocols and use of presynchronization programs that can increase P/AI, even to the point that fertility is higher with some TAI programs as compared with AI after standing estrus. Implementation of a systematic reproductive management program that utilizes efficient TAI programs with optimized management strategies can produce high reproductive indexes combined with healthy cows having high milk production termed “the high fertility cycle”. The scientific results that underlie these concepts are presented in this manuscript along with how these ideas can be practically implemented to improve reproductive efficiency on commercial dairy operations.

Effect of dose and timing of prostaglandin F2α treatments during a 7-d Ovsynch protocol on progesterone concentration at the end of the protocol and pregnancy outcomes in lactating Holstein cows

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of two prostaglandin F_2α (PGF) treatments 24 h apart (500 μg of cloprostenol) and treatment with a double PGF dose on d 7 (1000 μg of cloprostenol) during a 7-d Ovsynch protocol on progesterone (P4) concentration and pregnancy per artificial insemination (P/AI) in lactating Holstein cows. We hypothesized that treatment leads to a decreased P4 concentration at the second GnRH treatment (G2) and an increase in P/AI compared to the traditional 7-d Ovsynch protocol. A secondary hypothesis was that the treatment effect is influenced by the presence of a corpus luteum (CL) at the first GnRH treatment (G1). Two experiments were conducted on 8 commercial dairy farms in Germany. Once a week, cows from both experiments were assigned in a consecutive manner to receive: (1) Ovsynch (control: GnRH; 7 d, PGF; 9 d, GnRH), (2) Ovsynch with a double PGF dose (GDPG: GnRH; 7 d, 2xPGF; 9 d, GnRH), or (3) Ovsynch with a second PGF treatment 24 h later (GPPG: GnRH; 7 d, PGF; 8 d, PGF; 32 h, GnRH). All cows received timed AI (TAI) approximately 16 h after G2. Pregnancy diagnosis was performed by transrectal palpation (38 ± 3 d after TAI, experiment 1) or transrectal ultrasonography (35 ± 7 d after TAI, experiment 2). Whereas farms from experiment 1 used a Presynch-Ovsynch protocol (PGF, 14 d later PGF, 12 d later GnRH, 7 d later PGF, 2 d later GnRH, and 16-18 h later TAI) to facilitate first postpartum TAI, no presynchronization protocol was used on farms from experiment 2. In experiment 1, we enrolled 1581 lactating dairy cows (60 experimental units) from 2 dairy farms. At G2, blood samples were collected from a subsample of cows (n = 491; 16 experimental units) to determine P4 concentration at G2. In experiment 2, we enrolled 1979 lactating dairy cows (252 experimental units) from 6 dairy farms. Transrectal ultrasonography was performed to determine the presence or absence of a CL at G1. In experiment 1, treatment affected P/AI (P = 0.01) and P/AI was greater for GDPG (38.2%) and GPPG (38.9%) than for control cows (29.8%). Both, GDPG and GPPG cows had decreased P4 concentration at G2 compared with control cows (P < 0.01). Whereas both treatments increased the percentage of cows with very low P4 concentration (0.00-0.09 ng/mL) at G2, only the GPPG treatment decreased the percentage of cows with high P4 concentration (≥0.6 ng/mL) at G2 compared to the control group. In experiment 2, P/AI was greater for GPPG (37.4%) than for control cows (31.0%; P = 0.03) and tended to be greater than for GDPG cows (31.8%; P = 0.05). Cows from the GDPG group had similar (P = 0.77) P/AI compared to the control group. Pregnancy per AI did not differ between cows with a CL at G1 and cows without a CL at G1 (34.1% vs. 32.6%; P = 0.50). There was no interaction between treatment and presence of a CL at G1 on P/AI (P = 0.61). Combining data from the 2 experiments but excluding cows from experiment 1 receiving presynchronization before first TAI (n = 2573; 312 experimental units), P/AI was greater for GPPG (40.3%; P < 0.01) than for control (31.8%) and GDPG cows (33.4%). Between GDPG and control cows, P/AI did not differ (P = 0.46). We conclude that overall the addition of a second PGF treatment on d 8 during a 7-d Ovsynch protocol increased P/AI compared to the traditional 7-d Ovsynch including a single PGF dose on d 7 and to a double PGF dose on d 7. Doubling the PGF dose on d 7 in a 7-d Ovsynch protocol did not affect P/AI. Use of a presynchronization protocol, however, seems to influence the effect of a dose frequency modification of PGF treatment in an Ovsynch protocol. Presynchronized cows receiving first postpartum TAI had similarly increased P/AI treated with a double PGF dose compared with treatment with a second PGF dose. Future studies need to elucidate whether the treatment effect is modified by presynchronization of the first postpartum TAI.

Effect of GnRH 7 Days Before Presynchronization With Simultaneous PGF2α and GnRH on Reproductive Outcomes in Holstein Dairy Cows

We evaluated if an additional GnRH injection 7 days before pre-synchronization with simultaneous PGF_2α and GnRH (PG+G) would improve responses to presynchronization, synchronization, and pregnancy per AI (P/AI). We hypothesized that administering GnRH 7 days before PG+G would increase ovulation and corpus luteum (CL) presence at the PG+G, improve response to OvSynch treatments and P/AI. Holstein cows were blocked by parity and randomly assigned to either a PG+G (Control, n = 205); or to GnRH followed 7 days later by PG+G (ExtG, n = 201). At enrollment, Control was left untreated, whereas ExtG received GnRH. Seven days after enrollment, Control and ExtG received PG+G followed by OvSynch 7 days later (GnRH, 7 days PGF_2α, 56 h GnRH, 16 h timed AI). Ovarian dynamics were assessed using ultrasonography in a subset of cows (n = 53 for Control; and n = 50 for ExtG) at each treatment, except the 2^nd GnRH of OvSynch. Pregnancy diagnosed at 32- and 67-days post AI. Ovulation at enrollment tended (P = 0.06) to be higher for ExtG, but ovulation was not different at PG+G (P = 0.41) and first GnRH of the OvSynch (P = 0.25). There was a tendency (P = 0.08) for ExtG to have larger CL than Control at PGF_2α of the OvSynch. There were no differences in CL and follicle sizes in any other treatment point assessed. There were no differences (P = 0.12) in luteolysis between treatments after PG+G. Overall P/AI was similar between treatments on Day 32 (Control = 33.0% vs. ExtG = 34.6%, P = 0.75) and 67 (Control = 31.8% vs. ExtG = 32.5%, P = 0.29) post AI. There was a tendency for an interaction between treatment and parity (P = 0.09) for P/AI at day 67 post-AI. In multiparous cows, ExtG tended to have greater P/AI than Control, whereas, in primiparous cows Control tended to have greater P/AI than ExtG at day 67 post-AI. In conclusion, the effects of GnRH 7 days before PG+G presynchronization lead to positive and negative tendencies, respectively, in multiparous and primiparous cows for P/AI at day 67 post-AI and needs further investigation.

Lactating dairy cows managed for second and greater artificial insemination services with the Short-Resynch or Day 25 Resynch program had similar reproductive performance

The objective of this randomized controlled experiment was to evaluate reproductive performance and reproductive physiological outcomes of lactating Holstein cows managed for second and greater artificial insemination (AI) services with the Short-Resynch or Day 25 Resynch program. Cows from 2 commercial farms were randomly assigned after first service to the Short-Resynch (SR; n = 870) or Day 25 Resynch (D25R; n = 917) program in which they remained until 210 d after first service or left the herd. Cows in D25R received GnRH 25 ± 3 d after AI, whereas cows in SR did not. Cows not reinseminated at detected estrus (AIE) by 32 ± 3 d after AI underwent nonpregnancy diagnosis (NPD) through transrectal ultrasonography (TUS). Nonpregnant cows from both treatments with a corpus luteum (CL) ≥15 mm and an ovarian follicle ≥10 mm (hereafter, CL cows) received 2 PGF_2α treatments 24 h apart, GnRH 32 h after the second PGF_2α, and timed AI 16 to 18 h later. Cows that did not meet the criteria to be included in the CL group (NoCL cows) received a modified Ovsynch protocol with progesterone (P4) supplementation [P4-Ovsynch; GnRH and controlled internal drug-release device (CIDR) in, 7 d later CIDR removal and PGF_2α, 24 h later PGF_2α, 32 h later GnRH, and 16 to 18 h later timed AI]. In a subgroup of cows, blood samples were collected and TUS conducted at each treatment to evaluate ovarian responses to resynchronization. Binary data were analyzed with logistic regression, continuous data by ANOVA, and time-to-event data by Cox's proportional hazard regression. A greater proportion (mean; 95% CI) of cows were AIE before NPD in the SR (60.5%; 57.0-63.8; n = 3,416) than the D25R (50.1%; 46.5-53.7; n = 3,177) treatment, whereas pregnancy per AI (P/AI) at 32 d for AIE services before NPD was greater for the D25R (41.3%; 38.8-43.8; n = 1,560) than the SR (37.6%; 35.5-39.8; n = 1,961) treatment. At NPD, a greater proportion of cows in the D25R (84.3%; 82.2-86.2) than the SR (77.0%; 74.4-79.4) treatment were considered CL cows. Pregnancy per AI at 32 d was greater for the D25R than the SR treatment for all timed AI services (D25R = 43.0%; 40.2-45.9 vs. SR = 36.8%; 33.8-39.8) and for CL cows (D25R = 42.8%; 39.7-45.9 vs. SR = 33.8%; 30.6-37.2) but did not differ for NoCL cows (D25R = 39.4%; 32.1-47.3 vs. SR = 44.0%; 36.8-51.4). The hazard ratio for time to pregnancy (1.03; 0.93-1.14) and the proportion of cows not pregnant at the end of the observation period (D25R = 5.9%; 4.4-7.8 vs. SR = 6.7%; 5.0-8.7) did not differ between SR and D25R treatments. The GnRH treatment 25 d after AI resulted in more cows with P4 >1 ng/mL (D25R = 80.5%; 75.3-84.9 vs. SR = 63.6%; 57.3-69.4) and smaller follicle diameter at NPD 32 ± 3 d after AI for D25R (16.2 ± 0.4 mm) than for SR (17.5 ± 0.4 mm); however, it did not affect follicle diameter and luteal regression risk (CL cows only) before TAI. We concluded that the use of reproductive management programs including SR and D25R for CL cows and the P4-Ovsynch protocol for NoCL cows resulted in similar hazard of pregnancy and proportion of nonpregnant cows for up to 210 d after first service.

Use of on-farm milk progesterone information to predict fertility outcomes in dairy cows subjected to timed artificial insemination

The objectives of this study were to evaluate the use of a qualitative on-farm milk progesterone test to predict non-pregnancy in dairy cows. Lactating Jersey cows (n = 752) were subjected to the 5-d Cosynch-72 protocol for timed artificial insemination (AI; d -8 GnRH, d -3 and -2 PGF_2α, d 0 GnRH and timed AI). Milk was sampled on d -3, 0, 7, and 28 relative to timed AI, and progesterone concentrations were assessed using a lateral flow immunochromatographic test. Samples were classified into 3 groups indicative of high (hP4; test line not visible or lighter than reference), intermediate (iP4; test line similar to reference), and low (lP4; test line darker than reference) progesterone concentrations. Blood was sampled from a subset of cows (n = 50) on d -3, 0, 7, and 28 relative to timed AI, and plasma progesterone concentrations were determined by RIA. Cows were observed daily for signs of estrus based on removal of tail paint. Pregnancy was diagnosed by ultrasonography on d 34 and 62 after AI. Plasma progesterone concentrations across all time points were greater for hP4 (3.13 ± 0.20 ng/mL) followed by iP4 (1.12 ± 0.27 ng/mL) and lP4 (0.38 ± 0.23 ng/mL). Cows in lP4 on d -3 had lesser pregnancy per AI (P/AI) compared with iP4 and hP4 (17.4, 38.3, and 37.2%, respectively). For measurements performed on the day of AI (d 0), lP4 cows had greater P/AI compared with hP4 and iP4 (34.8, 0.0, and 15.6%, respectively), and the risk of pregnancy loss tended to be greater for iP4 compared with lP4. Cows in lP4 on d 7 after AI had lesser P/AI than those in iP4 and hP4 (12.0, 34.0, and 37.7%, respectively). Cows classified as lP4 on d 28 had the least P/AI on d 62 followed by iP4 and then hP4 (0.8, 9.2, and 59.4%, respectively) and were at the greatest risk for pregnancy loss (lP4 = 74.6%, iP4 = 8.4%, hP4 = 7.1%). Sensitivity and specificity to predict non-pregnancy on d 62 were 0.86 and 0.32 (d -3), 0.95 and 0.15 (d 0), 0.93 and 0.23 (d 7), and 0.99 and 0.53 (d 28), respectively. On-farm milk progesterone profiling using a lateral flow immunochromatographic test was able to identify cows without functional corpus luteum and to predict fertility outcomes following timed AI.

A lateral flow-based portable platform for determination of reproductive status of cattle

Our objective was to develop and validate a tool integrating a disposable fluorescence-based lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) coupled with a portable imaging device for estimating circulating plasma concentrations of progesterone (P4). First, we developed and optimized a competitive LFIA test strip to measure P4 in bovine plasma. The LFIA design included a sample pad, a conjugate pad that stores R-phycoerythrin-anti-P4 conjugates, a glass-fiber spacer pad, a nitrocellulose membrane with printed test and control lines, and a cellulose-fiber absorbent pad. To perform a test, 20 µL of plasma and 50 µL of running buffer were added on the sample pad. After 3 min, 45 µL of running buffer was added to initiate sample flow. After allowing 15 min to stabilize the colorimetric signal, strips were introduced in an LFIA portable reader wirelessly linked to a laptop to determine P4 concentration based on test-to-control-line signal (T/C ratio). In a series of experiments (n = 6), the ability of the LFIA to differentiate plasma samples with ≥1 or <1 ng/mL of P4 was evaluated. For each experiment, a calibration curve was constructed using plasma with known concentrations of P4 (0.1 to 3.7 ng/mL; n = 5). The resulting linear equation was then used to determine a T/C ratio cutoff to differentiate samples with ≥1 or <1 ng/mL of P4. In addition, to evaluate the ability of the platform to assign samples to P4 concentration groups without a calibration curve for individual batches, we performed a receiver operating characteristic analysis to identify a single cutoff value for T/C ratio that could potentially be used for all batches. Overall, calibration curves showed a linear relationship between T/C ratio and P4 levels (mean coefficient of determination = 0.74; range 0.42 to 0.99). Next, plasma samples from lactating dairy cows (n = 58) were tested in triplicate to determine the ability of the LFIA system to differentiate plasma samples with ≥1 or <1 ng/mL of P4 using a RIA for P4 as reference test. Overall, the LFIA assay correctly classified 90% of the samples, with 97% sensitivity, 83% specificity, 85% positive predictive value, and 96% negative predictive value. Agreement between the tests was substantial (kappa = 0.79; 95% confidence interval 0.64 to 0.95). When using a single cutoff value for T/C ratio selected by receiver operating characteristic analysis, sensitivity and specificity to determine CL presence were 97 (95% confidence interval 82 to 99) and 79% (95% confidence interval 60 to 92), respectively. These data suggest that the developed portable LFIA system can accurately differentiate plasma samples with ≥1 or <1 ng/mL of P4.

A reproductive management program aimed at increasing reinsemination of nonpregnant dairy cows at detected estrus resulted in similar reproductive performance to a program that favored timed artificial insemination

The objective of this experiment was to compare time to pregnancy and proportion of cows not pregnant 210 d after first service for cows managed for second and subsequent artificial insemination (AI) services with a reproductive management program that promoted reinsemination at detected estrus (AIE) or a program that promoted timed AI (TAI). After first service, lactating Holstein cows were blocked by parity and randomly assigned to d 32 Resynch (D32R; n = 464) or AIE Resynch (AIER; n = 512). To determine the effect of management strategies on time to pregnancy and cows not pregnant by the end of a 210 d at-risk period after first AI service, cows remained in AIER and D32R until pregnancy or herd exit. Cows in D32R received a GnRH treatment 32 ± 3 d after AI (first treatment intervention; FTI). Nonpregnancy diagnosis was conducted 7 d later by transrectal ultrasonography when nonpregnant cows with a corpus luteum (CL) ≥15 mm completed the Resynch protocol (PGF_2α, 56 h later GnRH, and 16 to 18 h later TAI) and cows without a CL (NoCL cows) were enrolled in a PreG-Ovsynch protocol (GnRH, 7 d later GnRH, 7 d later PGF_2α, 56 h later GnRH, and 16 to 18 h TAI) to receive TAI. For the AIER treatment, nonpregnant cows with a CL ≥15 mm observed by transrectal ultrasonography 32 ± 3 d after AI (i.e., FTI) received PGF_2α to induce estrus. Cows not AIE within 7 d were enrolled in Resynch (GnRH, 7 d later PGF_2α, 56 h later GnRH, and 16 to 18 h TAI). Cows in the NoCL group in AIER were enrolled in PreG-Ovsynch. Detection of estrus was performed based on visual observation of behavioral signs of estrus and tail-paint removal. Binomial data were analyzed with logistic regression and time to event data with Cox's proportional regression. After the FTI, a greater proportion of cows were AIE in AIER than D32R (36.0 vs. 11.9%) and more cows were AIE within 7 d of the FTI for AIER (25.0%) than D32R (4.8%). Overall pregnancy per AI at 68 ± 3 d after AI did not differ (AIER = 35.5% vs. D32R = 34.7%). The hazard of pregnancy up to 210 d after first AI for all cows enrolled (hazard ratio = 1.04, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.19) and for cows that received treatments only (D32R = 308, AIER = 349; hazard ratio = 1.00, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.19) did not differ. We conclude that a program aimed at increasing the proportion of cows reinseminated at detected estrus by treatment with PGF_2α at 32 ± 3 d after AI may be an alternative strategy for dairy farms that prefer or need to inseminate more cows at detected estrus rather than by TAI.

A shortened resynchronization treatment for dairy cows after a nonpregnancy diagnosis

We hypothesized that a shortened version of a modified Ovsynch program (OVS: GnRH-1 - 7 d - PGF_2α-1 - 24 h - PGF_2α-2 - 32 h - GnRH-2 - 16 h - AI) that excluded GnRH-1 to resynchronize ovulation in cows bearing a corpus luteum (CL) after a non-pregnancy diagnosis (NPD) or including progesterone supplementation with the OVS treatment for cows without a CL would produce shorter inter-insemination intervals and pregnancy per AI (P/AI) not different from that of cows treated with the OVS treatment. Of the 1697 lactating Holstein cows enrolled in this experiment, complete data were available for only 1584 cows because the remainder was not treated, inseminated per treatment design, left the herd before pregnancy diagnosis, or some other outcome was missing. Cows were enrolled in the study and assigned to either of three treatments at NPD (32 ± 3 d after AI [Day 0]). Cows with a detected CL were assigned randomly to: (1) a modified Ovsynch (OVS; GnRH-1 - 7 d - PGF_2α-1 - 24 h - PGF_2α-2 - 32 h - GnRH-2 - 16 h - AI) or (2) Short Synch (SS; PGF_2α-1 - 24 h - PGF_2α-2 - 32 h - GnRH-2 - 16 h - AI). Cows with no CL were assigned to OVS plus a progesterone insert (CIDR). Blood was collected at NPD to measure progesterone concentration and determine accuracy of treatment assignment (progesterone ≥ 1 ng/mL for a functional CL). Overall progesterone concentration at NPD was less in OVS + CIDR cows (1.5 ± 0.3 ng/mL) than in OVS (5.2 ± 0.2 ng/mL) or SS cows (3.7 ± 0.3 ng/mL). No differences in luteolytic risk (progesterone < 0.5 ng/mL at 72 h after PGF_2α-1) were detected after PGF_2α (>96.7%) and ovulation risk after GnRH-2 was 93.8, 91.7, and 86.2% for SS, OVS, and OVS + CIDR, respectively. Mean and median inter-insemination interval were less in SS (mean = 34.3 ± 0.05 d [median = 35 d] than OVS cows (40.2 ± 0.05 d [42 d]), but that in OVS cows did not differ from OVS + CIDR cows (41.4 ± 0.05 d [42 d]). Technicians were more accurate in visually detecting a functional CL than a non-functional CL (81.2 vs. 61.1%). Sensitivity of detecting a functional CL by technicians averaged 91.2%, but specificity was 39.8%. Pregnancy per AI at 32 ± 3 d after AI was less for SS (16.5% [n = 115]) than OVS (29.3% [n = 133] when a functional CL was inaccurately detected, but did not differ when a functional CL was detected accurately (27.6% [n = 561] vs 30.3% [508]). Pregnancy per AI did not differ between OVS and OVS + CIDR cows regardless of CL status. Short synch is an alternative to the entire modified Ovsynch program to produce similar P/AI when the CL status was detected accurately, and regardless of functional CL status, SS reduced inter-insemination intervals by 7 d.

Resynchronisation as an Element of Improving Cattle Reproduction Efficiency

Oestrus resynchronisation (RES, Resynch) programmes for non-pregnant cows allow shortening the period between an unsuccessful insemination and the next attempt on the same cow. The protocol of oestrus RES may be started after ruling out pregnancy by means of ultrasonography carried out 28 days after insemination or after performing a test for pregnancy-specific glycoproteins (PAG) in blood or milk. The Resynch protocol can be based on a double application of prostaglandins, the OvSynch protocol, or hormonal therapy with exogenous sources of progesterone (CIDR intravaginal devices). The efficiency of the method depends on the functional state of the ovaries, the diameter of the corpus luteum, external factors, and the health and maturity of the cows. The present paper constitutes a comparison of research findings concerning the effectiveness of RES programmes.

Presynchronization strategy using prostaglandin F2α, gonadotropin-releasing hormone, and detection of estrus to improve fertility in a resynchronization program for dairy cows

Objectives of experiment 1 were to evaluate pregnancy outcomes and reinsemination patterns of cows whose estrous cycles or ovulation were presynchronized with prostaglandin (PGF_2α) or PGF_2α and gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) after non-pregnancy diagnosis in programs focusing on inseminating cows based on tail paint removal. Objectives of experiment 2 were to evaluate pregnancy outcomes and reinsemination patterns of cows with or without a corpus luteum (CL) present at non-pregnancy diagnosis in a program utilizing PGF_2α and GnRH to presynchronize estrous cycles before resynchronization. Lactating Holstein cows from three herds were enrolled in the experiments at non-pregnancy diagnosis (d 0). Estrus was determined daily based on tail paint removal. In experiment 1, cows were assigned randomly to two treatments: (1) PGF_2α on d 0 (n = 967; P7); and 2) PGF_2α on d 0 and GnRH on d 7 (n = 962; P7G7). Cows not reinseminated based on tail paint removal were submitted to the timed-AI Cosynch-72 protocol 7 d after presynchronization treatments. Pregnancy per AI (P/AI) was greater (P = 0.01) for P7G7 cows than P7 cows. Cows inseminated based on tail paint removal had increased (P < 0.01) P/AI than cows submitted to the timed AI protocol. In addition, an interaction was detected (P = 0.03) between method of insemination and presynchronization treatment such that cows submitted to timed AI in the P7G7 treatment had greater P/AI than P7 cows. Nonetheless, P7 cows were inseminated at a faster rate (P < 0.01) than P7G7 cows. In experiment 2, presence of a CL was determined by transrectal ultrasonography at initiation of the P7G7 protocol (n = 1479). In a random subset of cows (n = 210), blood samples were collected immediately after ultrasound examination to determine progesterone concentration in order to evaluate accuracy of detection of a CL by ultrasonography. Accuracy of detection of a CL was 80%. Hazard to insemination and P/AI did not differ among cows regardless of CL status. In conclusion, herds relying mostly on detected estrus to reinseminate cows may achieve greater pregnancy outcomes if presynchronizing with PGF_2α and GnRH instead of only PGF_2α, albeit at a slower insemination rate. In addition, pregnancy outcomes and reinsemination patterns were similar for cows bearing or not bearing a CL when utilizing the P7G7 protocol, indicating a limited benefit of evaluating ovarian luteal structures by ultrasonography.

A resynchronization of ovulation program based on ovarian structures present at nonpregnancy diagnosis reduced time to pregnancy in lactating dairy cows

Our objective was to evaluate time to pregnancy after the first service postpartum and pregnancy per artificial insemination (P/AI) in dairy cows managed with 2 resynchronization of ovulation programs. After first service, lactating Holstein cows were blocked by parity (primiparous vs. multiparous) and randomly assigned to the d 32 Resynch (R32; n = 1,010) or short Resynch (SR; n = 1,000) treatments. Nonpregnancy diagnosis (NPD) was conducted 32 ± 3 d after AI by transrectal ultrasonography. Nonpregnant cows in R32 received the Ovsynch protocol: GnRH, PGF_2α 7 d later, GnRH 56 h later, and timed AI (TAI) 16 to 18 h later. Cows in SR with a corpus luteum (CL) ≥15 mm and a follicle ≥10 mm at NPD received PGF_2α, PGF_2α 24 h later, GnRH 32 h later, and TAI 16 to 18 h later. Cows in SR without a CL ≥15 mm or a follicle ≥10 mm at NPD received a modified Ovsynch protocol with 2 PGF_2α treatments and progesterone (P4) supplementation (GnRH plus CIDR, PGF_2α and CIDR removal 7 d later, PGF_2α 24 h later, GnRH 32 h later, and TAI 16 to 18 h later). Blood samples were collected from a subgroup of cows at the GnRH before TAI (R32 = 114; SR = 121) to measure P4 concentration. Binomial outcomes were analyzed with logistic regression and hazard of pregnancy (R32 = 485; SR = 462) with Cox's proportional regression in SAS (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). For P/AI analysis, the TAI service was the experimental unit (R32 = 720; SR = 819). Models included treatment and parity as fixed effects and farm as random effect. The hazard of pregnancy was greater for the SR treatment (hazard ratio = 1.18; 95% confidence interval: 1.01-1.37). Median time to pregnancy was 95 and 79 d for the R32 and SR treatments, respectively. At NPD, 71.3 and 71.2% of cows had a CL for the R32 and SR treatments, respectively. Treatment did not affect overall P/AI 32 ± 3 d after AI (R32 = 31.0% vs. SR = 33.9%) or for cows with a CL at NPD (R32 = 32.7% vs. SR = 32.8%). For cows with no CL at NPD, P/AI was greater for the SR treatment (36.9%) than for the R32 treatment (28.6%). Pregnancy loss from 32 to 63 d after AI was similar for all services combined (R32 = 8.3% vs. SR = 10.4%) and for cows with no CL at NPD (R32 = 13.2% vs. SR = 7.2%) but tended to be affected by treatment for cows with a CL at NPD (R32 = 6.8% vs. SR = 11.9%). Treatment affected the proportion of cows with P4 ≤0.5 ng/mL at the GnRH before TAI for all cows (R32 = 68.4% vs. SR = 81.8%), tended to have an effect among cows with a CL (R32 = 70.0% vs. SR = 81.8%), and had no effect for cows with no CL (R32 = 64.7% vs. SR = 81.8%). We concluded that the SR program reduced time to pregnancy because of a reduction of the interbreeding interval for cows with a CL at NPD and greater P/AI in cows with no CL at NPD.