1
|
Boschiero C, Neupane M, Yang L, Schroeder SG, Tuo W, Ma L, Baldwin RL, Van Tassell CP, Liu GE. A Pilot Detection and Associate Study of Gene Presence-Absence Variation in Holstein Cattle. Animals (Basel) 2024; 14:1921. [PMID: 38998033 PMCID: PMC11240624 DOI: 10.3390/ani14131921] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2024] [Revised: 06/18/2024] [Accepted: 06/26/2024] [Indexed: 07/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Presence-absence variations (PAVs) are important structural variations, wherein a genomic segment containing one or more genes is present in some individuals but absent in others. While PAVs have been extensively studied in plants, research in cattle remains limited. This study identified PAVs in 173 Holstein bulls using whole-genome sequencing data and assessed their associations with 46 economically important traits. Out of 28,772 cattle genes (from the longest transcripts), a total of 26,979 (93.77%) core genes were identified (present in all individuals), while variable genes included 928 softcore (present in 95-99% of individuals), 494 shell (present in 5-94%), and 371 cloud genes (present in <5%). Cloud genes were enriched in functions associated with hormonal and antimicrobial activities, while shell genes were enriched in immune functions. PAV-based genome-wide association studies identified associations between gene PAVs and 16 traits including milk, fat, and protein yields, as well as traits related to health and reproduction. Associations were found on multiple chromosomes, illustrating important associations on cattle chromosomes 7 and 15, involving olfactory receptor and immune-related genes, respectively. By examining the PAVs at the population level, the results of this research provided crucial insights into the genetic structures underlying the complex traits of Holstein cattle.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clarissa Boschiero
- Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, BARC, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA
- Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA
| | - Mahesh Neupane
- Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, BARC, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA
| | - Liu Yang
- Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, BARC, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA
- Department of Animal and Avian Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA
| | - Steven G Schroeder
- Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, BARC, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA
| | - Wenbin Tuo
- Animal Parasitic Diseases Laboratory, BARC, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA
| | - Li Ma
- Department of Animal and Avian Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA
| | - Ransom L Baldwin
- Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, BARC, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA
| | - Curtis P Van Tassell
- Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, BARC, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA
| | - George E Liu
- Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, BARC, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zheng M, Liao J, Li Z, Xu Z, Jiang Z, Tan L, Fu R, Xu H, Li Z, Zhang X, Nie Q. Evaluation of the selection of key individuals for genotype imputation in Chinese yellow-feathered chicken. Poult Sci 2023; 102:102901. [PMID: 37499612 PMCID: PMC10393784 DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2023.102901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2023] [Revised: 06/02/2023] [Accepted: 06/24/2023] [Indexed: 07/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Genotype imputation is a powerful technique employed by next-generation sequencing (NGS) and genotyping arrays, which can significantly enhance the cost-effectiveness and efficiency of genomic selection. The accuracy of imputation is largely determined by the choice of reference panel, with previous studies generally demonstrating that a closely related population as a reference panel leads to greater accuracy than a more distantly related population. Various strategies have been proposed for selecting desirable individuals via targeted resequencing, but their efficiencies need further improvement. In this study, we present a practical broiler selection methodology for a local Chinese chicken line that integrates established methods based on pedigree, genomics, and random sampling, and leverages genotype and pedigree information from the yellow-plumage dwarf chicken line. The efficacy of these selection strategies was assessed by evaluating their ability to accurately impute masked genotypes from data obtained using a 600K chip. Our findings reveal that the pedigree-based method yields superior accuracy in genotype imputation, whereas the haplotype-based method exhibits greater stability. Nonetheless, the impact of these targeted methods for selecting key individuals is slightly different when initiating a new sequencing project in a production context. Overall, this study highlights the advantages of using the pedigree-based approach as the preferred method for optimizing genotype imputation in broiler chickens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ming Zheng
- Lingnan Guangdong Laboratory of Modern Agriculture, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, Guangdong, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, and Key Laboratory of Chicken Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture, Guangzhou 510642, Guangdong, China; State Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Breeding, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, Guangdong, China
| | - Jiahao Liao
- Lingnan Guangdong Laboratory of Modern Agriculture, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, Guangdong, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, and Key Laboratory of Chicken Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture, Guangzhou 510642, Guangdong, China; State Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Breeding, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, Guangdong, China
| | - Zhuohang Li
- Lingnan Guangdong Laboratory of Modern Agriculture, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, Guangdong, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, and Key Laboratory of Chicken Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture, Guangzhou 510642, Guangdong, China; State Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Breeding, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, Guangdong, China
| | - Zhenqiang Xu
- Guangdong Wens Nanfang Poultry Breeding Co., Ltd., Xinxing 527439, China
| | - Ziqin Jiang
- Guangdong Wens Nanfang Poultry Breeding Co., Ltd., Xinxing 527439, China
| | - Liangtian Tan
- Lingnan Guangdong Laboratory of Modern Agriculture, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, Guangdong, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, and Key Laboratory of Chicken Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture, Guangzhou 510642, Guangdong, China; State Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Breeding, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, Guangdong, China
| | - Rong Fu
- Lingnan Guangdong Laboratory of Modern Agriculture, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, Guangdong, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, and Key Laboratory of Chicken Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture, Guangzhou 510642, Guangdong, China; State Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Breeding, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, Guangdong, China
| | - Haiping Xu
- Lingnan Guangdong Laboratory of Modern Agriculture, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, Guangdong, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, and Key Laboratory of Chicken Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture, Guangzhou 510642, Guangdong, China; State Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Breeding, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, Guangdong, China
| | - Zhenhui Li
- Lingnan Guangdong Laboratory of Modern Agriculture, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, Guangdong, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, and Key Laboratory of Chicken Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture, Guangzhou 510642, Guangdong, China; State Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Breeding, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, Guangdong, China
| | - Xiquan Zhang
- Lingnan Guangdong Laboratory of Modern Agriculture, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, Guangdong, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, and Key Laboratory of Chicken Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture, Guangzhou 510642, Guangdong, China; State Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Breeding, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, Guangdong, China
| | - Qinghua Nie
- Lingnan Guangdong Laboratory of Modern Agriculture, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, Guangdong, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, and Key Laboratory of Chicken Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture, Guangzhou 510642, Guangdong, China; State Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Breeding, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, Guangdong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cheng H, Xu K, Li J, Abraham KJ. Optimizing Sequencing Resources in Genotyped Livestock Populations Using Linear Programming. Front Genet 2021; 12:740340. [PMID: 34745214 PMCID: PMC8570094 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2021.740340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2021] [Accepted: 09/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Low-cost genome-wide single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are routinely used in animal breeding programs. Compared to SNP arrays, the use of whole-genome sequence data generated by the next-generation sequencing technologies (NGS) has great potential in livestock populations. However, sequencing a large number of animals to exploit the full potential of whole-genome sequence data is not feasible. Thus, novel strategies are required for the allocation of sequencing resources in genotyped livestock populations such that the entire population can be imputed, maximizing the efficiency of whole genome sequencing budgets. We present two applications of linear programming for the efficient allocation of sequencing resources. The first application is to identify the minimum number of animals for sequencing subject to the criterion that each haplotype in the population is contained in at least one of the animals selected for sequencing. The second application is the selection of animals whose haplotypes include the largest possible proportion of common haplotypes present in the population, assuming a limited sequencing budget. Both applications are available in an open source program LPChoose. In both applications, LPChoose has similar or better performance than some other methods suggesting that linear programming methods offer great potential for the efficient allocation of sequencing resources. The utility of these methods can be increased through the development of improved heuristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao Cheng
- Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States
| | - Keyu Xu
- Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States
| | - Jinghui Li
- Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States
| | - Kuruvilla Joseph Abraham
- Department of Economics, FEARP, University of São-Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.,Department of Computer Science-ICMC, University of São Paulo, São Carlos, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yang R, Guo X, Zhu D, Tan C, Bian C, Ren J, Huang Z, Zhao Y, Cai G, Liu D, Wu Z, Wang Y, Li N, Hu X. Accelerated deciphering of the genetic architecture of agricultural economic traits in pigs using a low-coverage whole-genome sequencing strategy. Gigascience 2021; 10:giab048. [PMID: 34282453 PMCID: PMC8290195 DOI: 10.1093/gigascience/giab048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2020] [Revised: 03/21/2021] [Accepted: 06/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Uncovering the genetic architecture of economic traits in pigs is important for agricultural breeding. However, high-density haplotype reference panels are unavailable in most agricultural species, limiting accurate genotype imputation in large populations. Moreover, the infinitesimal model of quantitative traits implies that weak association signals tend to be spread across most of the genome, further complicating the genetic analysis. Hence, there is a need to develop new methods for sequencing large cohorts without large reference panels. RESULTS We describe a Tn5-based highly accurate, cost- and time-efficient, low-coverage sequencing method to obtain 11.3 million whole-genome single-nucleotide polymorphisms in 2,869 Duroc boars at a mean depth of 0.73×. On the basis of these single-nucleotide polymorphisms, a genome-wide association study was performed, resulting in 14 quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for 7 of 21 important agricultural traits in pigs. These QTLs harbour genes, such as ABCD4 for total teat number and HMGA1 for back fat thickness, and provided a starting point for further investigation. The inheritance models of the different traits varied greatly. Most follow the minor-polygene model, but this can be attributed to different reasons, such as the shaping of genetic architecture by artificial selection for this population and sufficiently interconnected minor gene regulatory networks. CONCLUSIONS Genome-wide association study results for 21 important agricultural traits identified 14 QTLs/genes and showed their genetic architectures, providing guidance for genetic improvement harnessing genomic features. The Tn5-based low-coverage sequencing method can be applied to large-scale genome studies for any species without a good reference panel and can be used for agricultural breeding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruifei Yang
- State Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, No. 2 Yuanmingyuan west road, Haidian district, Beijing 100193, China
| | - Xiaoli Guo
- State Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, No. 2 Yuanmingyuan west road, Haidian district, Beijing 100193, China
| | - Di Zhu
- State Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, No. 2 Yuanmingyuan west road, Haidian district, Beijing 100193, China
| | - Cheng Tan
- National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, South China Agricultural University, No. 483 Wushan road, Tianhe district, Guangdong 510640, China
| | - Cheng Bian
- State Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, No. 2 Yuanmingyuan west road, Haidian district, Beijing 100193, China
| | - Jiangli Ren
- State Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, No. 2 Yuanmingyuan west road, Haidian district, Beijing 100193, China
| | - Zhuolin Huang
- State Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, No. 2 Yuanmingyuan west road, Haidian district, Beijing 100193, China
| | - Yiqiang Zhao
- State Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, No. 2 Yuanmingyuan west road, Haidian district, Beijing 100193, China
| | - Gengyuan Cai
- National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, South China Agricultural University, No. 483 Wushan road, Tianhe district, Guangdong 510640, China
| | - Dewu Liu
- National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, South China Agricultural University, No. 483 Wushan road, Tianhe district, Guangdong 510640, China
| | - Zhenfang Wu
- National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, South China Agricultural University, No. 483 Wushan road, Tianhe district, Guangdong 510640, China
| | - Yuzhe Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, No. 2 Yuanmingyuan west road, Haidian district, Beijing 100193, China
- National Research Facility for Phenotypic and Genotypic Analysis of Model Animals (Beijing), China Agricultural University, No. 2 Yuanmingyuan west road, Haidian district, Beijing 100193, China
| | - Ning Li
- State Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, No. 2 Yuanmingyuan west road, Haidian district, Beijing 100193, China
| | - Xiaoxiang Hu
- State Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, No. 2 Yuanmingyuan west road, Haidian district, Beijing 100193, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bakshy K, Heimeier D, Schwartz JC, Glass EJ, Wilkinson S, Skuce RA, Allen AR, Young J, McClure JC, Cole JB, Null DJ, Hammond JA, Smith TPL, Bickhart DM. Development of polymorphic markers in the immune gene complex loci of cattle. J Dairy Sci 2021; 104:6897-6908. [PMID: 33685702 DOI: 10.3168/jds.2020-19809] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2020] [Accepted: 01/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
The addition of cattle health and immunity traits to genomic selection indices holds promise to increase individual animal longevity and productivity, and decrease economic losses from disease. However, highly variable genomic loci that contain multiple immune-related genes were poorly assembled in the first iterations of the cattle reference genome assembly and underrepresented during the development of most commercial genotyping platforms. As a consequence, there is a paucity of genetic markers within these loci that may track haplotypes related to disease susceptibility. By using hierarchical assembly of bacterial artificial chromosome inserts spanning 3 of these immune-related gene regions, we were able to assemble multiple full-length haplotypes of the major histocompatibility complex, the leukocyte receptor complex, and the natural killer cell complex. Using these new assemblies and the recently released ARS-UCD1.2 reference, we aligned whole-genome shotgun reads from 125 sequenced Holstein bulls to discover candidate variants for genetic marker development. We selected 124 SNPs, using heuristic and statistical models to develop a custom genotyping panel. In a proof-of-principle study, we used this custom panel to genotype 1,797 Holstein cows exposed to bovine tuberculosis (bTB) that were the subject of a previous GWAS study using the Illumina BovineHD array. Although we did not identify any significant association of bTB phenotypes with these new genetic markers, 2 markers exhibited substantial effects on bTB phenotypic prediction. The models and parameters trained in this study serve as a guide for future marker discovery surveys particularly in previously unassembled regions of the cattle genome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Bakshy
- Dairy Forage Research Center, USDA-ARS, Madison, WI 53706
| | - D Heimeier
- The Pirbright Institute, Ash Road, Pirbright, Surrey GU24 0NF, UK
| | - J C Schwartz
- The Pirbright Institute, Ash Road, Pirbright, Surrey GU24 0NF, UK
| | - E J Glass
- The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush EH25 9RG, Edinburgh, UK
| | - S Wilkinson
- The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush EH25 9RG, Edinburgh, UK
| | - R A Skuce
- Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Stormont, Belfast, Northern Ireland BT4 3SD, UK
| | - A R Allen
- Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Stormont, Belfast, Northern Ireland BT4 3SD, UK
| | - J Young
- Dairy Forage Research Center, USDA-ARS, Madison, WI 53706
| | - J C McClure
- Dairy Forage Research Center, USDA-ARS, Madison, WI 53706
| | - J B Cole
- Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, USDA-ARS, Beltsville, MD 20705
| | - D J Null
- Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, USDA-ARS, Beltsville, MD 20705
| | - J A Hammond
- The Pirbright Institute, Ash Road, Pirbright, Surrey GU24 0NF, UK
| | - T P L Smith
- Meat Animal Research Center, USDA-ARS, Clay Center, NE 68933
| | - D M Bickhart
- Dairy Forage Research Center, USDA-ARS, Madison, WI 53706.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ros-Freixedes R, Whalen A, Gorjanc G, Mileham AJ, Hickey JM. Evaluation of sequencing strategies for whole-genome imputation with hybrid peeling. Genet Sel Evol 2020; 52:18. [PMID: 32248818 PMCID: PMC7132986 DOI: 10.1186/s12711-020-00537-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2019] [Accepted: 03/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND For assembling large whole-genome sequence datasets for routine use in research and breeding, the sequencing strategy should be adapted to the methods that will be used later for variant discovery and imputation. In this study, we used simulation to explore the impact that the sequencing strategy and level of sequencing investment have on the overall accuracy of imputation using hybrid peeling, a pedigree-based imputation method that is well suited for large livestock populations. METHODS We simulated marker array and whole-genome sequence data for 15 populations with simulated or real pedigrees that had different structures. In these populations, we evaluated the effect on imputation accuracy of seven methods for selecting which individuals to sequence, the generation of the pedigree to which the sequenced individuals belonged, the use of variable or uniform coverage, and the trade-off between the number of sequenced individuals and their sequencing coverage. For each population, we considered four levels of investment in sequencing that were proportional to the size of the population. RESULTS Imputation accuracy depended greatly on pedigree depth. The distribution of the sequenced individuals across the generations of the pedigree underlay the performance of the different methods used to select individuals to sequence and it was critical for achieving high imputation accuracy in both early and late generations. Imputation accuracy was highest with a uniform coverage across the sequenced individuals of 2× rather than variable coverage. An investment equivalent to the cost of sequencing 2% of the population at 2× provided high imputation accuracy. The gain in imputation accuracy from additional investment decreased with larger populations and higher levels of investment. However, to achieve the same imputation accuracy, a proportionally greater investment must be used in the smaller populations compared to the larger ones. CONCLUSIONS Suitable sequencing strategies for subsequent imputation with hybrid peeling involve sequencing ~2% of the population at a uniform coverage 2×, distributed preferably across all generations of the pedigree, except for the few earliest generations that lack genotyped ancestors. Such sequencing strategies are beneficial for generating whole-genome sequence data in populations with deep pedigrees of closely related individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roger Ros-Freixedes
- The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, The University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian, Scotland, UK
- Departament de Ciència Animal, Universitat de Lleida-Agrotecnio Center, Lleida, Spain
| | - Andrew Whalen
- The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, The University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian, Scotland, UK
| | - Gregor Gorjanc
- The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, The University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian, Scotland, UK
| | | | - John M. Hickey
- The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, The University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian, Scotland, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bhati M, Kadri NK, Crysnanto D, Pausch H. Assessing genomic diversity and signatures of selection in Original Braunvieh cattle using whole-genome sequencing data. BMC Genomics 2020; 21:27. [PMID: 31914939 PMCID: PMC6950892 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-020-6446-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2019] [Accepted: 12/31/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Autochthonous cattle breeds are an important source of genetic variation because they might carry alleles that enable them to adapt to local environment and food conditions. Original Braunvieh (OB) is a local cattle breed of Switzerland used for beef and milk production in alpine areas. Using whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data of 49 key ancestors, we characterize genomic diversity, genomic inbreeding, and signatures of selection in Swiss OB cattle at nucleotide resolution. Results We annotated 15,722,811 SNPs and 1,580,878 Indels including 10,738 and 2763 missense deleterious and high impact variants, respectively, that were discovered in 49 OB key ancestors. Six Mendelian trait-associated variants that were previously detected in breeds other than OB, segregated in the sequenced key ancestors including variants causal for recessive xanthinuria and albinism. The average nucleotide diversity (1.6 × 10− 3) was higher in OB than many mainstream European cattle breeds. Accordingly, the average genomic inbreeding derived from runs of homozygosity (ROH) was relatively low (FROH = 0.14) in the 49 OB key ancestor animals. However, genomic inbreeding was higher in OB cattle of more recent generations (FROH = 0.16) due to a higher number of long (> 1 Mb) runs of homozygosity. Using two complementary approaches, composite likelihood ratio test and integrated haplotype score, we identified 95 and 162 genomic regions encompassing 136 and 157 protein-coding genes, respectively, that showed evidence (P < 0.005) of past and ongoing selection. These selection signals were enriched for quantitative trait loci related to beef traits including meat quality, feed efficiency and body weight and pathways related to blood coagulation, nervous and sensory stimulus. Conclusions We provide a comprehensive overview of sequence variation in Swiss OB cattle genomes. With WGS data, we observe higher genomic diversity and less inbreeding in OB than many European mainstream cattle breeds. Footprints of selection were detected in genomic regions that are possibly relevant for meat quality and adaptation to local environmental conditions. Considering that the population size is low and genomic inbreeding increased in the past generations, the implementation of optimal mating strategies seems warranted to maintain genetic diversity in the Swiss OB cattle population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meenu Bhati
- Animal Genomics, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hoff JL, Decker JE, Schnabel RD, Seabury CM, Neibergs HL, Taylor JF. QTL-mapping and genomic prediction for bovine respiratory disease in U.S. Holsteins using sequence imputation and feature selection. BMC Genomics 2019; 20:555. [PMID: 31277567 PMCID: PMC6612181 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-019-5941-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2018] [Accepted: 06/26/2019] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND National genetic evaluations for disease resistance do not exist, precluding the genetic improvement of cattle for these traits. We imputed BovineHD genotypes to whole genome sequence for 2703 Holsteins that were cases or controls for Bovine Respiratory Disease and sampled from either California or New Mexico to construct and compare genomic prediction models. The sequence variation reference dataset comprised variants called for 1578 animals from Run 5 of the 1000 Bull Genomes Project, including 450 Holsteins and 29 animals sequenced from this study population. Genotypes for 9,282,726 variants with minor allele frequencies ≥5% were imputed and used to obtain genomic predictions in GEMMA using a Bayesian Sparse Linear Mixed Model. RESULTS Variation explained by markers increased from 13.6% using BovineHD data to 14.4% using imputed whole genome sequence data and the resolution of genomic regions detected as harbouring QTL substantially increased. Explained variation in the analysis of the combined California and New Mexico data was less than when data for each state were separately analysed and the estimated genetic correlation between risk of Bovine Respiratory Disease in California and New Mexico Holsteins was - 0.36. Consequently, genomic predictions trained using the data from one state did not accurately predict disease risk in the other state. To determine if a prediction model could be developed with utility in both states, we selected variants within genomic regions harbouring: 1) genes involved in the normal immune response to infection by pathogens responsible for Bovine Respiratory Disease detected by RNA-Seq analysis, and/or 2) QTL identified in the association analysis of the imputed sequence variants. The model based on QTL selected variants is biased but when trained in one state generated BRD risk predictions with positive accuracies in the other state. CONCLUSIONS We demonstrate the utility of sequence-based and biology-driven model development for genomic selection. Disease phenotypes cannot be routinely recorded in most livestock species and the observed phenotypes may vary in their genomic architecture due to variation in the pathogen composition across environments. Elucidation of trait biology and genetic architecture may guide the development of prediction models with utility across breeds and environments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jesse L Hoff
- Division of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA
| | - Jared E Decker
- Division of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA.,Informatics Institute, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA
| | - Robert D Schnabel
- Division of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA.,Informatics Institute, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA
| | - Christopher M Seabury
- Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA
| | - Holly L Neibergs
- Department of Animal Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, 99163, USA
| | - Jeremy F Taylor
- Division of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Butty AM, Sargolzaei M, Miglior F, Stothard P, Schenkel FS, Gredler-Grandl B, Baes CF. Optimizing Selection of the Reference Population for Genotype Imputation From Array to Sequence Variants. Front Genet 2019; 10:510. [PMID: 31214246 PMCID: PMC6554347 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00510] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2019] [Accepted: 05/10/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Imputation of high-density genotypes to whole-genome sequences (WGS) is a cost-effective method to increase the density of available markers within a population. Imputed genotypes have been successfully used for genomic selection and discovery of variants associated with traits of interest for the population. To allow for the use of imputed genotypes for genomic analyses, accuracy of imputation must be high. Accuracy of imputation is influenced by multiple factors, such as size and composition of the reference group, and the allele frequency of variants included. Understanding the use of imputed WGSs prior to the generation of the reference population is important, as accurate imputation might be more focused, for instance, on common or on rare variants. The aim of this study was to present and evaluate new methods to select animals for sequencing relying on a previously genotyped population. The Genetic Diversity Index method optimizes the number of unique haplotypes in the future reference population, while the Highly Segregating Haplotype selection method targets haplotype alleles found throughout the majority of the population of interest. First the WGSs of a dairy cattle population were simulated. The simulated sequences mimicked the linkage disequilibrium level and the variants’ frequency distribution observed in currently available Holstein sequences. Then, reference populations of different sizes, in which animals were selected using both novel methods proposed here as well as two other methods presented in previous studies, were created. Finally, accuracies of imputation obtained with different reference populations were compared against each other. The novel methods were found to have overall accuracies of imputation of more than 0.85. Accuracies of imputation of rare variants reached values above 0.50. In conclusion, if imputed sequences are to be used for discovery of novel associations between variants and traits of interest in the population, animals carrying novel information should be selected and, consequently, the Genetic Diversity Index method proposed here may be used. If sequences are to be used to impute the overall genotyped population, a reference population consisting of common haplotypes carriers selected using the proposed Highly Segregating Haplotype method is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrien M Butty
- Centre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada
| | - Mehdi Sargolzaei
- Centre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.,Select Sires Inc., Plain City, OH, United States
| | - Filippo Miglior
- Centre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada
| | - Paul Stothard
- Department of Agricultural, Food & Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Flavio S Schenkel
- Centre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada
| | - Birgit Gredler-Grandl
- Qualitas AG, Zug, Switzerland.,Animal Breeding and Genomics Centre, Wageningen UR Livestock Research, Wageningen, Netherlands
| | - Christine F Baes
- Centre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.,Institute of Genetics, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
A method for allocating low-coverage sequencing resources by targeting haplotypes rather than individuals. Genet Sel Evol 2017; 49:78. [PMID: 29070022 PMCID: PMC5655873 DOI: 10.1186/s12711-017-0353-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2017] [Accepted: 10/18/2017] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background This paper describes a heuristic method for allocating low-coverage sequencing resources by targeting haplotypes rather than individuals. Low-coverage sequencing assembles high-coverage sequence information for every individual by accumulating data from the genome segments that they share with many other individuals into consensus haplotypes. Deriving the consensus haplotypes accurately is critical for achieving a high phasing and imputation accuracy. In order to enable accurate phasing and imputation of sequence information for the whole population, we allocate the available sequencing resources among individuals with existing phased genomic data by targeting the sequencing coverage of their haplotypes. Results Our method, called AlphaSeqOpt, prioritizes haplotypes using a score function that is based on the frequency of the haplotypes in the sequencing set relative to the target coverage. AlphaSeqOpt has two steps: (1) selection of an initial set of individuals by iteratively choosing the individuals that have the maximum score conditional on the current set, and (2) refinement of the set through several rounds of exchanges of individuals. AlphaSeqOpt is very effective for distributing a fixed amount of sequencing resources evenly across haplotypes, which results in a reduction of the proportion of haplotypes that are sequenced below the target coverage. AlphaSeqOpt can provide a greater proportion of haplotypes sequenced at the target coverage by sequencing less individuals, as compared with other methods that use a score function based on haplotype frequencies in the population. A refinement of the initially selected set can provide a larger more diverse set with more unique individuals, which is beneficial in the context of low-coverage sequencing. We extend the method with an approach for filtering rare haplotypes based on their flanking haplotypes, so that only those that are likely to derive from a recombination event are targeted. Conclusions We present a method for allocating sequencing resources so that a greater proportion of haplotypes are sequenced at a coverage that is sufficiently high for population-based imputation with low-coverage sequencing. The haplotype score function, the refinement step, and the new approach for filtering rare haplotypes make AlphaSeqOpt more effective for that purpose than previously reported methods for reducing sequencing redundancy. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12711-017-0353-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|
11
|
Gonen S, Ros-Freixedes R, Battagin M, Gorjanc G, Hickey JM. A method for the allocation of sequencing resources in genotyped livestock populations. Genet Sel Evol 2017; 49:47. [PMID: 28521728 PMCID: PMC5437657 DOI: 10.1186/s12711-017-0322-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2016] [Accepted: 05/12/2017] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background This paper describes a method, called AlphaSeqOpt, for the allocation of sequencing resources in livestock populations with existing phased genomic data to maximise the ability to phase and impute sequenced haplotypes into the whole population. Methods We present two algorithms. The first selects focal individuals that collectively represent the maximum possible portion of the haplotype diversity in the population. The second allocates a fixed sequencing budget among the families of focal individuals to enable phasing of their haplotypes at the sequence level. We tested the performance of the two algorithms in simulated pedigrees. For each pedigree, we evaluated the proportion of population haplotypes that are carried by the focal individuals and compared our results to a variant of the widely-used key ancestors approach and to two haplotype-based approaches. We calculated the expected phasing accuracy of the haplotypes of a focal individual at the sequence level given the proportion of the fixed sequencing budget allocated to its family. Results AlphaSeqOpt maximises the ability to capture and phase the most frequent haplotypes in a population in three ways. First, it selects focal individuals that collectively represent a larger portion of the population haplotype diversity than existing methods. Second, it selects focal individuals from across the pedigree whose haplotypes can be easily phased using family-based phasing and imputation algorithms, thus maximises the ability to impute sequence into the rest of the population. Third, it allocates more of the fixed sequencing budget to focal individuals whose haplotypes are more frequent in the population than to focal individuals whose haplotypes are less frequent. Unlike existing methods, we additionally present an algorithm to allocate part of the sequencing budget to the families (i.e. immediate ancestors) of focal individuals to ensure that their haplotypes can be phased at the sequence level, which is essential for enabling and maximising subsequent sequence imputation. Conclusions We present a new method for the allocation of a fixed sequencing budget to focal individuals and their families such that the final sequenced haplotypes, when phased at the sequence level, represent the maximum possible portion of the haplotype diversity in the population that can be sequenced and phased at that budget. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12711-017-0322-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serap Gonen
- The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, The University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian, Scotland, UK
| | - Roger Ros-Freixedes
- The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, The University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian, Scotland, UK
| | - Mara Battagin
- The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, The University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian, Scotland, UK
| | - Gregor Gorjanc
- The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, The University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian, Scotland, UK
| | - John M Hickey
- The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, The University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Midlothian, Scotland, UK.
| |
Collapse
|