Resynchronizing the first eligible estrus in dairy cattle after a prior insemination and fertility of the prior insemination after gonadotropin-releasing hormone and progesterone treatments

The hypothesis of this study tested whether application of designed treatments to synchronize estrus in nonpregnant previously inseminated lactating dairy cows increased the proportion of nonpregnant cows in estrus before early pregnancy diagnosis on Day 32 after the previous insemination (Day 0) and increase fertility of the pretreatment insemination. A progesterone insert (CIDR) and GnRH were applied to cows after insemination to resynchronize the returning estrus of cows that failed to conceive on Day 0. The combination of GnRH (Day 14) and a CIDR insert (d 17 through 24) in experiment 1 (n = 347 cows) did not increase (P = 0.13) the proportion of nonpregnant cows returning to estrus before pregnancy diagnosis, but increased (P < 0.01) the synchrony of their return by 24.4% points, and delayed (P < 0.01) that return by 2.3 ± 0.3 d compared with controls. Ovulation risk after GnRH treatment on Day 14 was only 10%. For cows that failed to return to estrus before Day 32, progesterone concentration on Days 14 and 17 were less than that in cows that returned to estrus by Day 32 and in pregnant cows. Cows that returned to estrus had larger follicles and fewer numbers of CL on Day 21 than pregnant cows and cows that failed to return to estrus, but concentrations of pregnancy-associated glycoproteins on Day 28 indicated that cows failing to return to estrus were likely pregnant but suffered embryo death. In experiment 2 (n = 881), use of GnRH alone (Day 7), a CIDR insert alone (Days 14 through 21), or in combination, failed to increase the proportion of nonpregnant cows in estrus before pregnancy diagnosis on Day 32 compared with controls. Cows receiving the CIDR insert had increased (P < 0.01) synchrony of estrus by 24-34% points compared with cows that did not receive a CIDR insert. More cows receiving GnRH had 2 or more CL on Days 14 and 21 compared with controls. Ovulation risk after GnRH on Day 7 was greater than 66%. In both experiments combined, treatments with GnRH or GnRH + CIDR insert increased (P = 0.015) pretreatment pregnancy per AI by 7.1% points, but did not affect pregnancy loss. Although administering GnRH with or without a CIDR insert synchronized returns to estrus, treatments failed to increase the proportion of nonpregnant cows reinseminated before pregnancy diagnosis, but increased pretreatment pregnancy risk.

Luteal Presence and Ovarian Response at the Beginning of a Timed Artificial Insemination Protocol for Lactating Dairy Cows Affect Fertility: A Meta-Analysis

Progesterone (P4) concentration during follicular growth has a major impact on fertility response in timed artificial insemination (TAI) protocols. Luteal presence at the beginning of a TAI protocol and ovarian response after the first gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) injection (G1) affect P4 concentration and subsequently pregnancy per artificial insemination (P/AI). A systematic review of the literature and meta-analytical assessment was performed with the objective of evaluating the magnitude of the effect of luteal presence and ovarian response at the beginning of a TAI protocol on P/AI in lactating dairy cows. We considered only studies using synchronisation protocols consisting of GnRH and prostaglandin F _2α. The time interval between G1 and prostaglandin F _2α (PGF _2α) had to range from 5 to 7 d. The time interval between the PGF _2α injection and G2 had to range from 48 to 72 h. We used 28 controlled experiments from 27 published manuscripts including 16,489 cows with the objective of evaluating the effect size of having a functional corpus luteum (CL) at G1 on P/AI. Information regarding ovulatory response after G1 was available for 5676 cows. In a subset of cows (n = 4291), information was available for luteal presence and ovulatory response at the initiation of the TAI protocol. A functional CL at G1 increased (p < 0.001) the relative risk of conceiving (RR (relative risk) = 1.32; 95% CI = 1.21-1.45) in lactating dairy cows. Ovulation after G1 increased (p < 0.001) the relative risk of conceiving (RR = 1.29; 95% CI = 1.20-1.38) in lactating dairy cows. The effect of ovulatory response on P/AI after G1 was affected by luteal presence at G1. In summary, there was a clear benefit on P/AI for cows starting a TAI protocol with a functional CL (+10.5 percentage units) and cows ovulating at the beginning of a TAI protocol (+11.0 percentage units).

Pregnancy outcomes are not improved by administering gonadotropin-releasing hormone at initiation of a 5-day CIDR-Cosynch resynchronization protocol for lactating dairy cows

Using a 5-d controlled internal drug-release (CIDR)-Cosynch resynchronization protocol, the objective of this study was to determine the effect of the initial GnRH injection on pregnancy per artificial insemination (P/AI) to the second artificial insemination in lactating Holstein dairy cows. On 37 ± 3 d (mean ± standard deviation) after the first artificial insemination, and upon nonpregnancy diagnosis (d 0 of the experiment), lactating cows eligible for a second artificial insemination (n = 429) were enrolled in a 5-d CIDR-Cosynch protocol. On d 0, all cows received a CIDR insert and were assigned randomly to receive the initial GnRH injection (GnRH; n = 226) of the protocol or no-GnRH (n = 203). Blood samples were collected from a sub-group of cows (n = 184) on d 0 and analyzed for progesterone (P4) concentration. On d 5, CIDR inserts were removed, and all cows received 1 injection of PGF_2α. On d 6 and 7, cows were observed once daily by employees for tail-chalk removal, and cows detected in estrus on d 6 or 7 received artificial insemination that day (EDAI), and did not receive the final GnRH injection. The remaining cows not detected in estrus by d 8 received GnRH and timed artificial insemination (TAI). Pregnancy status was confirmed by transrectal palpation of uterine contents at 37 ± 3 d (mean ± standard deviation) after the second artificial insemination. Eliminating the initial GnRH injection had no effect on P/AI compared with cows receiving GnRH (27 vs. 21%), respectively. Similarly, method of insemination (EDAI vs. TAI) and its interaction with treatment had no effect on P/AI. Primiparous cows had greater P/AI than multiparous cows (31 vs. 21%). Mean P4 concentrations (n = 184) at the initiation of the protocol did not differ between treatments (4.51 ± 0.35 ng/mL no-GnRH vs. 3.96 ± 0.34 ng/mL of GnRH). When P4 concentrations were categorized as high (≥1 ng/mL) or low (<1 ng/mL), P/AI tended to be greater for high P4 concentrations (n = 136) compared with low (n = 48) P4 concentrations (26 vs. 16%, respectively). No differences were observed in the proportion of cows with high or low P4 between treatments. Collectively, these results provide evidence that eliminating the initial GnRH in a 5-d CIDR-Cosynch resynchronization protocol for lactating dairy cows did not reduce P/AI in this study.