1
|
Durand G, Charrier P, Bes S, Bernard L, Lamothe V, Gruffat D, Bonnet M. Gene expression of free fatty acids-sensing G protein-coupled receptors in beef cattle. J Anim Sci 2024; 102:skae114. [PMID: 38659415 DOI: 10.1093/jas/skae114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2024] [Accepted: 04/24/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Many physiological functions are regulated by free fatty acids (FFA). Recently, the discovery of FFA-specific G protein-coupled receptors (FFARs) has added to the complexity of their actions at the cellular level. The study of FFAR in cattle is still in its earliest stages focusing mainly on dairy cows. In this study, we set out to map the expression of genes encoding FFARs in 6 tissues of beef cattle. We also investigated the potential effect of dietary forage nature on FFAR gene expression. To this end, 16 purebred Charolais bulls were fed a grass silage ration or a maize silage ration (n = 8/group) with a forage/concentrate ratio close to 60:40 for 196 d. The animals were then slaughtered at 485 ± 42 d and liver, spleen, ileum, rectum, perirenal adipose tissue (PRAT), and Longissimus Thoracis muscle were collected. FFAR gene expression was determined by real-time quantitative PCR. Our results showed that of the five FFARs investigated, FFAR1, FFAR2, FFAR3, and GPR84 are expressed (Ct < 30) in all six tissues, whereas FFAR4 was only expressed (Ct < 30) in PRAT, ileum, and rectum. In addition, our results showed that the nature of the forage, i.e., grass silage or maize silage, had no effect on the relative abundance of FFAR in any of the tissues studied (P value > 0.05). Taken together, these results open new perspectives for studying the physiological role of these receptors in beef cattle, particularly in nutrient partitioning during growth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guillaume Durand
- INRAE, Université Clermont Auvergne, VetagroSup, UMRH, 63122 Saint-Genès-Champanelle, France
- Bordeaux Sciences Agro, 33170 Gradignan, France
| | | | - Sébastien Bes
- INRAE, Université Clermont Auvergne, VetagroSup, UMRH, 63122 Saint-Genès-Champanelle, France
| | - Laurence Bernard
- INRAE, Université Clermont Auvergne, VetagroSup, UMRH, 63122 Saint-Genès-Champanelle, France
| | | | - Dominique Gruffat
- INRAE, Université Clermont Auvergne, VetagroSup, UMRH, 63122 Saint-Genès-Champanelle, France
| | - Muriel Bonnet
- INRAE, Université Clermont Auvergne, VetagroSup, UMRH, 63122 Saint-Genès-Champanelle, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Revskij D, Haubold S, Plinski C, Viergutz T, Tuchscherer A, Kröger-Koch C, Albrecht E, Günther J, Tröscher A, Hammon HM, Schuberth HJ, Mielenz M. Cellular detection of the chemokine receptor CXCR4 in bovine mammary glands and its distribution and regulation on bovine leukocytes. J Dairy Sci 2021; 105:866-876. [PMID: 34763920 DOI: 10.3168/jds.2021-20799] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2021] [Accepted: 09/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Mastitis has a high incidence in dairy cows. Experimental infection with Escherichia coli increased the number of leukocytes in milk and the gene expression of the chemokine receptor CXCR4 in mammary gland tissues. A link between CXCR4 expression and lipopolysaccharide sensing was demonstrated in other species using in vitro models. The receptor that binds the chemokine stomal cell-derived factor 1 might be associated with the inflammatory response in bovine mammary glands. However, studies in cows are rare, and data on the localization of CXCR4 in bovine mammary glands and its distribution in bovine leukocytes are lacking. Fatty acids (FA) affect the inflammatory response. In human peripheral blood monocytes, exposure to conjugated linoleic acids (CLA) decreases the expression of CXCR4, leading to a decreased inflammatory response in these cells. In this study, we analyzed the expression of CXCR4 in the mammary glands of dairy cows by immunohistochemistry (n = 5) and laser capture microdissection followed by qualitative PCR (n = 3). We characterized the surface expression of CXCR4 on bovine leukocytes, including monocyte subpopulations, first by flow cytometry (n = 5) and then confirmed these results by Western blotting (n = 3). Rumen fistulated dairy cows (n = 4; 126 ± 4 d in milk) were fitted with abomasal infusion tubes, arranged in a 4 × 4 Latin square design, and supplemented for 6 wk twice daily with rising doses of FA followed by a 3-wk washout period. Then, CXCR4 expression on leukocytes was analyzed. The cows received a corn-based diet and were supplemented with coconut oil delivering medium-chain FA (38 g/d), linseed-safflower oil mix delivering n-3 FA (EFA, 39 g of linseed oil and 2 g of safflower oil per day), Lutalin (cis-9,trans-11 and trans-10,cis-12 CLA, 5 g/d; BASF), and EFA + CLA. In the bovine mammary gland, the epithelial cells of the lactiferous duct, but not alveolar epithelial cells, showed clear CXCR4 protein and mRNA signals. Among the leukocyte subsets, monocytes displayed the highest percentage of CXCR4-positive cells (87%), whereas circulating neutrophils showed almost no CXCR4 surface expression (3%) but stored the receptor intracellularly. The percentage of CXCR4-positive leukocytes was not affected by the different FA supplements, but FA supplementation reduced the receptor abundance per cell (40% on average). In conclusion, CXCR4 was clearly detected in the lactiferous duct cells of the mammary gland but not in the alveolar epithelial cells. Compared with other leukocytes, bovine monocytes showed the highest signal intensity of CXCR4 on their surface, whereas granulocytes stored CXCR4 intracellularly. Supplementation with all the FA reduced the surface expression of CXCR4 per leukocyte and could therefore potentially affect the inflammatory status associated with the surface expression of CXCR4. The importance of our observations should be verified in cows with mastitis in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Denis Revskij
- Research Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN), 18196 Dummerstorf, Germany
| | - Susanne Haubold
- Research Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN), 18196 Dummerstorf, Germany
| | - Christian Plinski
- Research Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN), 18196 Dummerstorf, Germany
| | - Torsten Viergutz
- Research Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN), 18196 Dummerstorf, Germany
| | - Armin Tuchscherer
- Research Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN), 18196 Dummerstorf, Germany
| | - Claudia Kröger-Koch
- Research Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN), 18196 Dummerstorf, Germany
| | - Elke Albrecht
- Research Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN), 18196 Dummerstorf, Germany
| | - Juliane Günther
- Research Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN), 18196 Dummerstorf, Germany
| | | | - Harald M Hammon
- Research Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN), 18196 Dummerstorf, Germany
| | - Hans-Joachim Schuberth
- Institute of Immunology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Foundation, Buenteweg 2, 30559 Hannover, Germany
| | - Manfred Mielenz
- Research Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN), 18196 Dummerstorf, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bionaz M, Vargas-Bello-Pérez E, Busato S. Advances in fatty acids nutrition in dairy cows: from gut to cells and effects on performance. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 2020; 11:110. [PMID: 33292523 PMCID: PMC7667790 DOI: 10.1186/s40104-020-00512-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2020] [Accepted: 09/08/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
High producing dairy cows generally receive in the diet up to 5-6% of fat. This is a relatively low amount of fat in the diet compared to diets in monogastrics; however, dietary fat is important for dairy cows as demonstrated by the benefits of supplementing cows with various fatty acids (FA). Several FA are highly bioactive, especially by affecting the transcriptome; thus, they have nutrigenomic effects. In the present review, we provide an up-to-date understanding of the utilization of FA by dairy cows including the main processes affecting FA in the rumen, molecular aspects of the absorption of FA by the gut, synthesis, secretion, and utilization of chylomicrons; uptake and metabolism of FA by peripheral tissues, with a main emphasis on the liver, and main transcription factors regulated by FA. Most of the advances in FA utilization by rumen microorganisms and intestinal absorption of FA in dairy cows were made before the end of the last century with little information generated afterwards. However, large advances on the molecular aspects of intestinal absorption and cellular uptake of FA were made on monogastric species in the last 20 years. We provide a model of FA utilization in dairy cows by using information generated in monogastrics and enriching it with data produced in dairy cows. We also reviewed the latest studies on the effects of dietary FA on milk yield, milk fatty acid composition, reproduction, and health in dairy cows. The reviewed data revealed a complex picture with the FA being active in each step of the way, starting from influencing rumen microbiota, regulating intestinal absorption, and affecting cellular uptake and utilization by peripheral tissues, making prediction on in vivo nutrigenomic effects of FA challenging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Massimo Bionaz
- Department of Animal and Rangeland Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, 97331, USA.
| | - Einar Vargas-Bello-Pérez
- Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Grønnegårdsvej 3, DK-1870, Frederiksberg C, Denmark
| | - Sebastiano Busato
- Department of Animal and Rangeland Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, 97331, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Free Fatty Acid Receptors 2 and 3 as Microbial Metabolite Sensors to Shape Host Health: Pharmacophysiological View. Biomedicines 2020; 8:biomedicines8060154. [PMID: 32521775 PMCID: PMC7344995 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines8060154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2020] [Revised: 05/30/2020] [Accepted: 06/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The role of the gut microbiome in human health is becoming apparent. The major functional impact of the gut microbiome is transmitted through the microbial metabolites that are produced in the gut and interact with host cells either in the local gut environment or are absorbed into circulation to impact distant cells/organs. Short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) are the major microbial metabolites that are produced in the gut through the fermentation of non-digestible fibers. SCFAs are known to function through various mechanisms, however, their signaling through free fatty acid receptors 2 and 3 (FFAR2/3; type of G-coupled protein receptors) is a new therapeutic approach. FFAR2/3 are widely expressed in diverse cell types in human and mice, and function as sensors of SCFAs to change several physiological and cellular functions. FFAR2/3 modulate neurological signaling, energy metabolism, intestinal cellular homeostasis, immune response, and hormone synthesis. FFAR2/3 function through Gi and/or Gq signaling, that is mediated through specific structural features of SCFAs-FFAR2/3 bindings and modulating specific signaling pathway. In this review, we discuss the wide-spread expression and structural homologies between human and mice FFAR2/3, and their role in different human health conditions. This information can unlock opportunities to weigh the potential of FFAR2/3 as a drug target to prevent human diseases.
Collapse
|
5
|
Ringseis R, Gessner DK, Eder K. The Gut-Liver Axis in the Control of Energy Metabolism and Food Intake in Animals. Annu Rev Anim Biosci 2019; 8:295-319. [PMID: 31689373 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-animal-021419-083852] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Recent research has convincingly demonstrated a bidirectional communication axis between the gut and liver that enables the gut microbiota to strongly affect animals' feeding behavior and energy metabolism. As such, the gut-liver axis enables the host to control and shape the gut microbiota and to protect the intestinal barrier. Gut microbiota-host communication is based on several gut-derived compounds, such as short-chain fatty acids, bile acids, methylamines, amino acid-derived metabolites, and microbial-associated molecular patterns, which act as communication signals, and multiple host receptors, which sense the signals, thereby stimulating signaling and metabolic pathways in all key tissues of energy metabolism and food intake regulation. Disturbance in the microbial ecosystem balance, or microbial dysbiosis, causes profound derangements in the regulation of appetite and satiety in the hypothalamic centers of the brain and in key metabolic pathways in peripheral tissues owing to intestinal barrier disruption and subsequent induction of hepatic and hypothalamic inflammation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Ringseis
- Institute of Animal Nutrition and Nutrition Physiology, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, 35392 Giessen, Germany;
| | - Denise K Gessner
- Institute of Animal Nutrition and Nutrition Physiology, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, 35392 Giessen, Germany;
| | - Klaus Eder
- Institute of Animal Nutrition and Nutrition Physiology, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, 35392 Giessen, Germany;
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Alarcon P, Manosalva C, Carretta MD, Hidalgo AI, Figueroa CD, Taubert A, Hermosilla C, Hidalgo MA, Burgos RA. Fatty and hydroxycarboxylic acid receptors: The missing link of immune response and metabolism in cattle. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 2018; 201:77-87. [PMID: 29914687 DOI: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2018.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2018] [Revised: 03/07/2018] [Accepted: 05/14/2018] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
Fatty and hydroxycarboxylic acids are one of the main intermediates of energy metabolism in ruminants and critical in the milk production of cattle. High production demands on a dairy farm can induce nutritional imbalances and metabolism disorders, which have been widely associated with the onset of sterile inflammatory processes and increased susceptibility to infections. The literature suggests that short-chain fatty acids (SCFA), long-chain fatty acids (LCFA) and hydroxycarboxylic acids are relevant modulators of the host innate inflammatory response. For instance, increased SCFA and lactate levels are associated with subacute ruminal acidosis (SARA) and the activation of pro-inflammatory processes mediated by diverse leukocyte and vascular endothelial cells. As such, free LCFA and the ketone body β-hydroxybutyrate are significantly increased in the plasma 1-2 weeks postpartum, coinciding with the time period in which cows are more susceptible to acquiring infectious diseases that the host innate immune system should actively oppose. Today, many of these pro-inflammatory responses can be related to the activation of specific G protein-coupled receptors, including GPR41/FFA3 and GPR43/FFA2 for SCFA; GPR40/FFA1 and GPR120/FFA4 for LCFA, GPR109A/HCA2 for ketone body β-hydroxybutyrate, and GPR81/HCA1 for lactate, all expressed in different bovine tissues. The activation of these receptors modulates the release of intracellular granules [e.g., metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) and lactoferrin], radical oxygen species (ROS) production, chemotaxis, and the production of relevant pro-inflammatory mediators. The article aimed to review the role of natural ligands and receptors and the resulting impact on the host innate immune reaction of cattle and, further, to address the most recent evidence supporting a potential connection to metabolic disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Alarcon
- Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, Institute of Pharmacology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia, Chile
| | - C Manosalva
- Pharmacy Institute, Faculty of Science, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia, Chile
| | - M D Carretta
- Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, Institute of Pharmacology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia, Chile
| | - A I Hidalgo
- Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, Institute of Pharmacology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia, Chile
| | - C D Figueroa
- Laboratory of Cellular Pathology, Institute of Anatomy, Histology & Pathology, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia, Chile
| | - A Taubert
- Institute of Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany
| | - C Hermosilla
- Institute of Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany
| | - M A Hidalgo
- Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, Institute of Pharmacology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia, Chile
| | - R A Burgos
- Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, Institute of Pharmacology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia, Chile.
| |
Collapse
|