Short communication: Optimization of a timed artificial insemination program for reproductive management of heifers in Canadian dairy herds

Success rate of artificial insemination, reproductive performance and economic impact of failure of first service insemination: a retrospective study

Background

A retrospective cohort study using a 10 year artificial insemination (AI) and cow reproductive performance data was conducted to study the success rate of AI; associations between effectiveness of AI and breed, AI season and, number of service per conception, and economic impact of failure of FSC in Dessie town, Dessie zuria and Kutaber districts. A total of 3480 dairy cows’ AI and reproductive performance records which were performed between 2003 and 2013 in the three selected districts of South Wollo were used. The economic losses and costs for cows that failed to conceive at their first AI associated with the larger number of days open were estimated.

Result

The prevalence of conception has a statistically significant difference between breeds of cows (P = 0.019). The non-return rate for first service was 58.54%. The median days to first service (DFS), inter-service interval (ISI) and gestation length (GL) were 126, 30 and 278 days respectively. Whereas, the mean + SD days open, calving interval (CI), number of inseminations (NOI) and number of services per conception (NSPC) were 147.2 ± 60.26, 424.5 ± 60.55, 1.14 ± 0.38 and 1.15 ± 0.39 respectively. Based on AI season there was a significant difference in conception between winter and spring (P = 0.021). There is a 45.04 days extension in the mean calving to conception interval in cows that did not conceive at their first AI but conceived by 2nd and 3rd AI than in cows that did conceive at their first AI. A total of 21,665.3 ETB extra costs was spent on reproductive treatment and other management for cows that failed to conceive at their first AI but conceived by second and third service. In cows that did not conceive totally the owner losses on average 473.7 ETB per cow per day extra costs until the cows will be culled.

Conclusion

Therefore to increase the conception rate and decrease the economic loss the owners of the dairy cows should supervise the cows regularly and should be trained on how to identify cows on estrous, the AI technicians should be trained to conduct the AI service accurately.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12917-022-03325-1.

Economic comparison of an ear tag automated activity monitor for estrus detection with timed-AI in Holstein heifers

The objective of this study was to compare the economic performance of an ear tag automated activity monitor system (AAM) versus a timed-AI (TAI) protocol in Holstein heifers. In total, 340 heifers were enrolled onto the study at 13.5 mo of age and randomly assigned to receive either an AAM (n = 170) or TAI (n = 170) protocol before breeding eligibility (D 0). Heifers in the AAM group were fitted with an ear tag AAM and bred based on high activity alert from the system. Heifers in the TAI group received a progesterone releasing intravaginal device on D -8, followed by device removal and prostaglandin on D -3 and gonadotropin-releasing hormone with TAI on D 0. In both treatments, the majority of heifers received sex-sorted semen for the first AI and conventional semen for subsequent AIs, with three opportunities to become pregnant. All heifers were diagnosed for pregnancy approximately 25 d post AI using transrectal ultrasonography, with confirmation at 30 and 45 d. Non-pregnant heifers in the TAI group, were resynchronized using the same TAI protocol. A partial budget was used to compare the costs and benefits of switching from a TAI to an AAM protocol in heifers, including protocol, labour, and rearing costs for each treatment, as well as estimated calf and milk value. Sensitivity analyses were also conducted to determine the effect of pregnancy per AI (P/AI), outsourcing AI, AAM tag cost and herd size on the net outcome. There was no difference in overall P/AI or days to pregnancy between treatments. However, number of AI was greater in the TAI than the AAM group. For the first AI, the P/AI was less in the TAI compared to the AAM group; however, the interval to first AI was less in TAI. There was minimal difference in performance for the second and third AI. There was a net gain of $11.97 per heifer when switching from a TAI to AAM protocol, due to the increased P/AI to the first AI and reduced cost of hormones. Several variables in the sensitivity analyses affected the net outcome. Considering only the first AI, switching to an AAM collar and a larger herd size all increased the net gain. Considering a greater P/AI to the first AI in the TAI group, outsourcing AI, using more AAM ear tags, and smaller herd sizes resulted in a net loss when switching from TAI to AAM. The AAM system resulted in exceptional P/AI and may be an economically viable alternative to improve heifer reproductive efficiency in herds with suboptimal P/AI to TAI.

Comparison of pregnancy per AI of heifers inseminated with sex-sorted or conventional semen after oestrus detection or timed artificial insemination

The objective of the study was to compare the fertility after using sex-sorted or conventional semen either with oestrus detection (EST) or timed artificial insemination (TAI) in Holstein heifers. Holstein heifers were randomly assigned to one of the following treatments in a 2 × 2 factorial design. Heifers in the EST group were inseminated with sex-sorted (n = 114) or conventional semen (n = 100) after spontaneous or induced oestrus. Heifers in the TAI, subjected to the 5-day Cosynch+Progesterone protocol (GnRH+P4 insertion-5d-PGF_2α +P4 removal-1d-PGF_2α -2d-GnRH+TAI), were inseminated with sex-sorted (n = 113) or conventional semen (n = 88). Statistical analyses were performed using PROC GLIMMIX procedure of SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). Overall P/AI was 60.7% for EST and 54.2% for TAI regardless of types of semen and 68.1% for conventional and 48.9% for sex-sorted semen regardless of insemination strategies. Fertility of heifers inseminated with either sex-sorted (53.5%; 44.2%) or conventional (69.0%; 67.0%) semen did not differ between EST and TAI respectively. Besides, the interaction between the semen type and the insemination strategy was not significant for P/AI. The embryonic loss was significantly greater with sex-sorted semen (17.1%) compared to conventional semen (1.6%). There was no sire effect with sex-sorted semen on P/AI (52.6% vs. 46.2%) and embryonic loss (16.4% vs. 18.0%). As expected, sex-sorted semen resulted in more female calves (89.8% vs. 51.6%) than conventional semen. Thus, sex-sorted semen can be used with 5-day Cosynch+Progesterone protocol to eliminate the inadequate oestrus detection and to increase female calves born in dairy heifers.

Effect of Endometrial Sampling Procedures on Subsequent Pregnancy Rate of Cattle

Endometrial infections are a common cause of reproductive loss in cattle. Accurate diagnosis is important to reduce the economic losses caused by endometritis. A range of sampling procedures have been developed which enable collection of endometrial tissue or luminal cells or uterine fluid. However, as these are all invasive procedures, there is a risk that sampling around the time of breeding may adversely affect subsequent pregnancy rate. This systematic review compared the pregnancy rates (PR) of cattle which underwent uterine lavage (UL), cotton swab (CS), cytobrush (CB), cytotape (CT), or endometrial biopsy (EB) sampling procedures with those that were not sampled. Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) protocol, relevant databases, including Pubmed, Web of Science, CAB Abstracts, VetMed Resource-Ruminants, and Scopus, were searched. The outcome measured was the pregnancy rate after the collection of endometrial sample(s). Seven studies, involving a total of 3693 cows, fulfilled the inclusion criteria for the systematic review and allowed the comparison of PR between sampled (n = 1254) and non-sampled cows (n = 2409). The results of the systematic review showed that endometrial sampling procedures can be performed before breeding or shortly after insemination without adversely affecting pregnancy rates in cattle. However, further studies are needed to validate this information.

The effect of altering the timing of GnRH administration and artificial insemination in a modified 5-d CO-Synch protocol using sex-sorted semen in dairy heifers

The objective was to optimize fertility in a modified 5-d CO-Synch protocol by altering the timing of GnRH administration and AI. Holstein heifers (14-16 mo) received a controlled internal drug releasing device (CIDR) on d 0 and on d 5, CIDR were removed, prostaglandin F2α was administered and estrus detection patches were applied. Estrus was detected at 36, 48, 56 and 72 h after CIDR removal. In Experiment 1, control heifers (n = 195) received GnRH concurrent with timed-AI (TAI) 72 h after CIDR removal, regardless of expression of estrus. Treatment heifers expressing estrus at 36 or 48 h were AI at 56 h (n = 101) and the remaining heifers were randomly assigned to one of two groups: GnRH administration at 56 h and TAI at 72 h (GnRH56, n = 147) or GnRH administered concurrently with TAI at 72 h (GnRH72, n = 148). In Experiment 2, heifers expressing estrus at 36 or 48 h following CIDR removal were AI at 56 h (n = 118) and the remaining heifers were either TAI at 72 h (TAI72, n = 102) or 80 h (TAI80, n = 102), with only heifers not displaying estrus by TAI given GnRH concurrent with AI. All heifers were inseminated with sex-sorted semen and pregnancy diagnosis was performed at 28 d following TAI. In Experiment 1, estrus rate (P = 0.81) and pregnancy per AI (P/AI; P = 0.34) did not differ among control, GnRH56 and GnRH72 groups, so GnRH56 and GnRH72 groups were combined into one split-TAI (STAI) group. The P/AI was greater in heifers displaying estrus by 48 h compared to those not displaying estrus and receiving GnRH in both groups (69.5 vs. 31.3%; P < 0.01) and there was a tendency for P/AI to increase in STAI heifers displaying estrus compared to control heifers displaying estrus (73.3 vs. 62.1%; P = 0.10). In Experiment 2, the estrus rate was increased in TAI80 compared to TAI72 heifers (81.4 vs. 62.7%, P < 0.01); however, there was no difference in P/AI (P = 0.74). Heifers displaying estrus in the TAI72 group had a greater P/AI than heifers not displaying estrus in either group (P < 0.01) and tended to have a greater P/AI than heifers in estrus in the TAI80 group (87.5 vs. 69.9%, P = 0.07). Across both experiments, P/AI was increased in heifers that displayed estrus before AI compared with heifers that did not and performing a STAI tended to increase P/AI in heifers that displayed estrus before AI. Other attempts made to optimize P/AI in the modified 5-d CO-Synch protocol by altering the timing of GnRH administration and/or AI were unsuccessful.

Performance and optimization of an ear tag automated activity monitor for estrus prediction in dairy heifers

The objectives of this study were to evaluate the performance of the SCR eSense ear tag automated activity monitor (AAM) to detect estrus behavior in Holstein heifers and to determine the optimal time from estrus alert to artificial insemination (AI) using sex-sorted or conventional semen. In total, 281 heifers were fitted with the AAM once eligible for breeding (>13.5 m of age). For the first AI, estrus was synchronized using 500 μg of cloprostenol (PGF), given 14 d apart, and heifers were given estrus detection patches (Estrotect™) after the second PGF. Heifers were inseminated at randomly attributed times after high activity alert from the AAM system or if the estrus patch had ≥ 50% colour change. Most heifers received sex-sorted semen for the first AI and conventional semen for subsequent inseminations. Pregnancy diagnosis was performed at 30 d post AI and heifers had four opportunities to become pregnant. In a subset of heifers (n = 149), ovaries were scanned every 12 h from the time of AI until ovulation (OV). The system recorded a heat index (measure of estrus strength), maximum activity change, maximum rumination change and duration of high activity. The sensitivity was 91.0%, with a false positive and false negative rate of 8.0%, and the positive predictive value to detect true estrus events was 83.5%. Pregnancy per AI to first AI was 67.6% and 97.9% of heifers become pregnant after four inseminations. Most false positive estrus events had a heat index < 45 and a rumination change < -20, while false negative events had a rumination change ≥ -20. Odds of pregnancy was not associated with any estrus characteristics measured by the system. However, pre-ovulatory follicle diameter had a weak correlation (r < 0.25) with all estrus characteristics. The average (range) interval of onset of high activity, peak activity and end of high activity to OV was 28 h (16-46 h), 22 h (10-40 h) and 16 h (0-36 h), respectively. For conventional semen, each hour increase in interval from activity onset or peak activity to AI reduced the predicted probability of pregnancy by 3.8 and 4.2%, respectively. For sex-sorted semen, the relationship between activity onset or peak activity to AI and predicted probability of pregnancy was quadratic, but not significant. Overall, the SCR eSense ear tag AAM performed well and strategies to identify false positive and false negative estrus events, along with optimization of timing of AI, should further improve performance in Holstein heifers.

Reproductive Performance in a Selected Sample of Dairy Farms in Una-Sana Canton, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Background

The production of milk and dairy products and their placement on the market represent a constant profit for the farmers/producers in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BH). The profitable operation of the dairy farms is influenced by the reproductive performance of the lactating animals. This study assessed individual animal reproductive characteristics in selected dairy farms and described their reproductive performance indicators.

Results

The median age at first insemination was 493 days (5^th–95^th percentile range 429–840), while the age at first calving was 802 days (5^th–95^th percentile range 708–1168). The median pregnancy proportion at first insemination was 40% (5^th–95^th percentile range 17–62), while the cumulative pregnancy rate calculated at day-60, day-80, day-100, and day-120 showed that approximately 64% of all pregnancies happened before day-120. The calculated interservice intervals showed that approximately 69% of the repeat breeding animals came back to the oestrus in the period of 18 to 24 days. This is an indication of very good oestrus detection in selected dairy farms. The mean number of services per pregnancy was 2.61 (range 1–12). The median calving-to-first-insemination interval was 62.5 days (5^th–95^th percentile range 16–408). The calving-to-conception interval was 101 day (5^th–95^th percentile range 36–506). Finally, the calving interval was 385 days (5^th–95^th percentile range 329–773).

Conclusions

There is a need for an organised, regular, and more comprehensive recording system for the reproduction of dairy cattle among dairy farms in Una-Sana Canton. The calculated reproductive measures indicated an undulant trend in reproductive performance among selected dairy farms in Una-Sana Canton. Knowing the apparent reproductive indicators described in this study, the farmers and veterinary authorities may identify and correct areas in their management that contribute to the reproductive underperformance.

Comparison of the effects of two shortened timed-AI protocols on pregnancy per AI in beef cattle

The objective was to compare pregnancy per AI (P/AI) between two shortened timed-AI (TAI) protocols in beef cattle. This study also determined whether administration of eCG in heifers and timing of AI in cows would affect P/AI. Cattle were submitted at random to either a modified 5-d Co-synch protocol (Day 0 = progesterone releasing device (CIDR); Day 5 = CIDR removal and 500 μg of cloprostenol (PGF); Day 8 = 100 μg GnRH concurrent with AI) or J-synch protocol (Day 0 = CIDR insertion and 2 mg of estradiol benzoate i.m.; Day 6 = CIDR removal and 500 μg PGF; Day 9 = 100 μg GnRH concurrent with AI). In Experiment 1, 1135 heifers (13-15 mo of age) received an estrus detection patch (Estrotect™) on Day 5 and 579 were selected at random to receive 300 IU of equine chorionic gonadotropin (eCG) at the time of CIDR removal. Patches were scored from 0 to 3 based on color change between initial application and AI; 0 = unchanged, 1 = ≤ 50% change, 2 = > 50% change, 3 = missing. Estrus was defined to have occurred when the patch was scored 2 or 3. In Experiment 2, 399 cyclic, non-lactating beef cows from 1 location were submitted to either the modified 5-d Co-synch or J-synch protocol and within each protocol cows were TAI at either 66 ± 1 (n = 199) or 72 ± 1 h (n = 200) following CIDR removal. Transrectal ultrasonography was used in both experiments to determine presence of a corpus luteum (CL) on Day 0, and to diagnose pregnancy 35 d after TAI. In Experiment 1, eCG increased estrus rate only in heifers without a CL on day 0 that were submitted to the modified 5-d Co-synch protocol (41.9 vs. 69.6%). Heifers submitted to the J-synch protocol had greater (P = 0.03) P/AI compared with those in the modified 5-d Co-synch (48.7 vs. 41.1%) and heifers that expressed estrus before AI had increased (P < 0.0001) P/AI compared to those that did not (53.6 vs. 36.5%). Administration of eCG and presence of a CL tended to affect P/AI (P = 0.13). In Experiment 2, cows submitted to the J-synch protocol tended (P = 0.07) to have greater P/AI compared to those in the modified 5-d Co-synch (74.1 vs. 66.5%). There was no association between P/AI and timing of AI. In summary, the J-synch protocol resulted in greater P/AI than the modified 5-day Co-synch protocol in heifers and cows. Administration of eCG increased estrus rate in heifers without a CL at the start of the protocol and tended to improve P/AI in all heifers. Timing of AI (66 vs. 72 h) had no effect on P/AI in cows subjected to either TAI protocol.

Sonogram of coccygeus muscle in dairy cows with different gestational ages

BACKGROUND

The change in size and weight of the female reproductive organs during gestation and birth might be affect the perineal muscles and this condition in dairy cow not been reported. This study aimed to assess the ultrasonographic image of coccygeus muscle in 11 inseminated dairy cows with different gestational ages and postpartum.

METHODS

Gestational age was calculated based on the record of artificial insemination and confirmed by using transrectal brightness mode ultrasonography. Perineal hair between the sacrum and ischium bones was shaved along 3-5 cm before being ultrasound. The images of perineal area were obtained by transcutaneous ultrasound using a 5.0 MHz transducer. The thickness and intensity of the coccygeus muscle were measured and analyzed by gestational status and postpartum to show the differences.

RESULTS

The results showed that the thickness of coccygeus muscle increased with the increase in gestational age. Muscle intensity only increased at young gestational age. However, it decreased with the increase in gestational age (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The ultrasound image of coccygeus muscle was affected by gestational status, thus this method may be used as one of the new methods of indirect gestational detection on dairy cows.

Effect of initial GnRH and time of insemination on reproductive performance in cyclic and acyclic beef heifers subjected to a 5-d Co-synch plus progesterone protocol

This study evaluated the effect of initial GnRH and timing of AI in a 5-d Co-synch plus CIDR (device containing 1.38 g of progesterone) protocol on pregnancy per AI (P/AI) and pregnancy loss in beef heifers. A secondary objective was to determine if the effect of initial GnRH on reproductive performance was influenced by cyclicity. Crossbred beef heifers (n = 1068; 301-514 kg of body weight, and 13-15 mo of age) at three locations were assigned to either a 5-d Co-synch plus CIDR protocol with (CIDR5G) or without (CIDR5NG) an initial injection of 100 μg of GnRH at CIDR insertion (Day 0). All heifers received a single dose of 500 μg of cloprostenol at CIDR removal (Day 5) and were divided into two groups to receive GnRH and TAI at either 66 or 72 h (Day 8) after CIDR removal. All heifers were inseminated by one technician with frozen-thawed semen from 1 of 4 sires available commercially. Transrectal ultrasonography was performed on Day 0 to determine cyclicity (presence of CL) and normalcy of the reproductive track, and 27 d after TAI to determine pregnancy status. Non-pregnant heifers (n = 470) were assigned to either a CIDR5G or a CIDR5NG protocol with TAI at 72 h after CIDR removal. Twelve days after second AI, heifers were exposure to bulls for 20 d and pregnancy diagnoses were performed approximately 30 d after second TAI and 60 d after bulls were removed to diagnose bull pregnancies and determine pregnancy loss rate. The percentage of acyclic heifers was 20.3%. Overall P/AI after first TAI was 55.6% (594/1068) and did not differ between CIDR5G and CIDR5NG (56.1 vs. 55.1%), or between TAI66 and TAI72 (55.8 vs. 55.4%). However, cyclic heifers were more likely to become pregnant than acyclic ones (59.3 vs. 41.2%; P < 0.01). Moreover, acyclic heifers subjected to the CIDR5NG had fewer P/AI than those subjected to CIDR5G (P < 0.01). Overall P/AI after resynchronization was 55.1% and did not differ between CIDR5G and CIDR5NG (51.3 vs. 59.0%). Overall pregnancy loss after first and second TAI were 3.0% (18/594) and 3.9% (8/205), respectively. When pregnancy loss data were combined, synchronization protocol (4.1 vs. 2.3% for CIDR5NG and CIDR5G; P = 0.01), cyclicity (5.8 vs. 2.9% for acyclic and cyclic; P = 0.03) and the interaction between synchronization protocol and cyclicity (P = 0.04) were significant. The overall cumulative pregnancy at the end of the breeding season was 94.2% (1006/1068); acyclic heifers were less likely to be pregnant at the end of the breeding season (88.4 vs. 95.8%; P < 0.01). In summary, the initial GnRH administration in a 5-d Co-synch plus CIDR protocol that includes a single PGF treatment is necessary in acyclic beef heifers to optimize P/AI, but not in cyclic heifers. Moreover, omission of initial GnRH was associated to greater pregnancy losses, particularly in acyclic heifers. Timing of AI did not affect P/AI.