Effect of reproductive management programs for first service on replacement dairy heifer economics

A stochastic animal life cycle simulation model for a whole dairy farm system model: Assessing the value of combined heifer and lactating dairy cow reproductive management programs

This analysis introduces a stochastic herd simulation model and evaluates the estimated reproductive and economic performance of combinations of reproductive management programs for both heifers and lactating cows. The model simulates the growth, reproductive performance, production, and culling for individual animals and integrates individual animal outcomes to represent herd dynamics daily. The model has an extensible structure, allowing for future modification and expansion, and has been integrated into the Ruminant Farm Systems model, a holistic dairy farm simulation model. The herd simulation model was used to compare outcomes of 10 reproductive management scenarios based on common practices on US farms with combinations of estrous detection (ED) and artificial insemination (AI), synchronized estrous detection (synch-ED) and AI, timed AI (TAI, 5-d CIDR-Synch) programs for heifers; and ED, a combination of ED and TAI (ED-TAI, Presynch-Ovsynch), and TAI (Double-Ovsynch) with or without ED during the reinsemination period for lactating cows. The simulation was run for a 1,000-cow (milking and dry) herd for 7 yr, and we used the outcomes from the final year to evaluate results. The model accounted for incomes from milk, sold calves, and culled heifers and cows, as well as costs from breeding, AI, semen, pregnancy diagnosis, and calf, heifer, and cow feed. We found that the interaction between heifer and lactating dairy cow reproductive management programs influences herd economic performance primarily due to heifer rearing costs and replacement heifer supply. The greatest net return (NR) was achieved when combining heifer TAI and cow TAI without ED during the reinsemination period, whereas the lowest NR was obtained when combining heifer synch-ED with cow ED.

Ovarian luteal category at the time of exogenous progesterone treatment alters pre-ovulatory follicle size and pregnancy outcome but not initial GnRH treatment in repeat-breeder crossbred dairy heifers submitted to the 7-day fixed-time AI protocol

•

Ovarian and fertility outcomes were similar for repeat-breeder crossbred dairy heifers with or without initial GnRH treatment.

•

Presence of luteal tissue at the time of progesterone (P4) treatment in infertile heifers resulted in a 68.6% pregnancy rate (PR).

•

The likelihood of PR was higher in infertile heifers bearing luteal tissue on the day of exogenous P4 trigger.

Repeat breeding is a substantial problem in heifer and cow breeding leading to greater infertility for female dairy herds. The aim of present study was to investigate the impact of corpus luteum (CL) presence and category and the first gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) administration concurrent with exogenous progesterone (P4) treatment on the largest follicle (LF) size and pregnancy rate (PR) in repeat-breeder crossbred dairy heifers submitted to the fixed-time artificial insemination (AI) protocol. Heifers (n= 243) were synchronised with (+GnRH) or without (–GnRH) first GnRH in the 7-day P4-GnRH-prostaglandin F2α-based programme. Each GnRH group was divided on presence of CL into two groups (+CL and –CL) in a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement. The PR was similar among –GnRH–CL (20.7%), –GnRH+CL (68.8%), +GnRH–CL (30.4%), and +GnRH+CL (68.3%) groups. However, presence of CL in heifers produced a 43.6% increase in PR compared to PR of heifers without CL (odds ratio = 6.550). Heifers bearing large-sized CL had greater large-sized LF on the day of fixed-time AI and PR. Plasma P4 concentration was positively related with CL diameter (r= 0.845; p < 0.001). The diameter of ovarian LF on the day of fixed-time AI was positively associated with P4 concentrations (r= 0.512; p < 0.001). We highlight that ovarian CL presence and category at the time of exogenous P4 treatment alters pre-ovulatory follicle size and PR but not initial GnRH treatment in repeat-breeder crossbred dairy heifers submitted to service with the 7-day fixed-time AI programme.

Economics of timed artificial insemination with unsorted or sexed semen in a high-producing, pasture-based dairy production system

This study used a stochastic simulation model to estimate the potential economic benefit of using timed artificial insemination (TAI) in combination with conventional unsorted (TCONV) and sexed (TSEX) semen in heifers only (TCONV-H, TSEX-H) and in both heifers and lactating cows (TCONV-HC, TSEX-HC) in a high-producing, pasture-based production system. The scenarios were compared with a conventional reproductive policy (CONV) in which heifers and cows were inseminated with conventional unsorted semen after estrus detection. Sensitivity analysis was also used to estimate the effect of hormone costs from TAI use on the profitability of each program relative to CONV. The mean annual (± standard deviation) profit advantage (ΔPROF) over CONV for TCONV-H, TCONV-HC, TSEX-H, and TSEX-HC scenarios were €3.90/cow ± 4.65, €34.11/cow ± 25.69, €13.96/cow ± 6.83, and €41.52/cow ± 42.86, respectively. Combined application of both technologies was shown to return a greater annual ΔPROF on average compared with that achievable from TAI alone. However, the risk of not returning a positive annual ΔPROF varied across the scenarios with higher risk in TCONV-H and TSEX-HC. Specifically, TCONV-H and TSEX-HC had a 24 and 18% chance, respectively, of not returning a positive annual ΔPROF. Sensitivity analysis showed that when hormone costs increased by €10/cow TCONV-H and TSEX-HC had a 38 and 23% chance, respectively, of not returning a positive annual ΔPROF. The range in ΔPROF for TCONV policies was most sensitive to the TAI pregnancy rate and TSEX policies were most sensitive to the relative fertility achieved with sexed compared with unsorted semen. This study has shown TAI and sexed semen are complementary technologies that can increase genetic gain and profitability in a pasture-based, dairy production system.

Comparison of reproductive management programs for submission of Holstein heifers for first insemination with conventional or sexed semen based on expression of estrus, pregnancy outcomes, and cost per pregnancy

Our objective was to evaluate reproductive management programs for submission of Holstein heifers for first insemination with conventional or sexed semen. In experiment 1, nulliparous Holstein heifers (n = 462) were submitted to a 5-d progesterone-releasing intravaginal device (PRID)-Synch protocol [d 0, GnRH + PRID; d 5, PGF_2α - PRID; d 6, PGF_2α; d 8, GnRH + TAI] and were randomly assigned for PRID removal on d 5 or 6 of the protocol followed by timed artificial insemination (TAI) with conventional semen. Delaying PRID removal decreased early expression of estrus before scheduled TAI (0.9 vs. 12.2%), and pregnancies per AI (P/AI) did not differ between treatments. In experiment 2, nulliparous Holstein heifers (n = 736) from 3 commercial farms were randomized within farm to 1 of 3 treatments for first AI with sexed semen: (1) CIDR5 [d -6, GnRH + controlled internal drug release (CIDR); d -1, PGF_2α - CIDR; d 0, PGF_2α; d 2, GnRH + TAI]; (2) CIDR6 (d -6, GnRH + CIDR; d -1, PGF_2α; d 0, PGF_2α - CIDR; d 2, GnRH + TAI); and (3) EDAI (PGF_2α on d 0 followed by once-daily estrous detection and AI). Delaying CIDR removal decreased early expression of estrus before scheduled TAI (0.004 vs. 27.8%); however, CIDR5 heifers tended to have more P/AI at 35 (53 vs. 45 vs. 46%) and 64 (52 vs. 45 vs. 45%) days after AI than CIDR6 and EDAI heifers, respectively. Overall, CIDR5 and CIDR6 heifers had fewer days to first AI and pregnancy than EDAI heifers which resulted in less feed costs than EDAI heifers due to fewer days on feed until pregnancy. Despite greater hormonal treatment costs for CIDR5 heifers, costs per pregnancy were $16.66 less for CIDR5 than for EDAI heifers. In conclusion, delaying PRID removal by 24 h within a 5-d PRID-Synch protocol in experiment 1 suppressed early expression of estrus before TAI, and P/AI for heifers inseminated with conventional semen did not differ between treatments. By contrast, although delaying CIDR removal by 24 h within a 5-CIDR-Synch protocol in experiment 2 suppressed early expression of estrus before TAI, delaying CIDR removal by 24 h tended to decrease P/AI for heifers inseminated with sexed semen. Further, submission of heifers to a 5-d CIDR-Synch protocol for first AI tended to increase P/AI and decrease the cost per pregnancy compared with EDAI heifers.

Economic comparison of an ear tag automated activity monitor for estrus detection with timed-AI in Holstein heifers

The objective of this study was to compare the economic performance of an ear tag automated activity monitor system (AAM) versus a timed-AI (TAI) protocol in Holstein heifers. In total, 340 heifers were enrolled onto the study at 13.5 mo of age and randomly assigned to receive either an AAM (n = 170) or TAI (n = 170) protocol before breeding eligibility (D 0). Heifers in the AAM group were fitted with an ear tag AAM and bred based on high activity alert from the system. Heifers in the TAI group received a progesterone releasing intravaginal device on D -8, followed by device removal and prostaglandin on D -3 and gonadotropin-releasing hormone with TAI on D 0. In both treatments, the majority of heifers received sex-sorted semen for the first AI and conventional semen for subsequent AIs, with three opportunities to become pregnant. All heifers were diagnosed for pregnancy approximately 25 d post AI using transrectal ultrasonography, with confirmation at 30 and 45 d. Non-pregnant heifers in the TAI group, were resynchronized using the same TAI protocol. A partial budget was used to compare the costs and benefits of switching from a TAI to an AAM protocol in heifers, including protocol, labour, and rearing costs for each treatment, as well as estimated calf and milk value. Sensitivity analyses were also conducted to determine the effect of pregnancy per AI (P/AI), outsourcing AI, AAM tag cost and herd size on the net outcome. There was no difference in overall P/AI or days to pregnancy between treatments. However, number of AI was greater in the TAI than the AAM group. For the first AI, the P/AI was less in the TAI compared to the AAM group; however, the interval to first AI was less in TAI. There was minimal difference in performance for the second and third AI. There was a net gain of $11.97 per heifer when switching from a TAI to AAM protocol, due to the increased P/AI to the first AI and reduced cost of hormones. Several variables in the sensitivity analyses affected the net outcome. Considering only the first AI, switching to an AAM collar and a larger herd size all increased the net gain. Considering a greater P/AI to the first AI in the TAI group, outsourcing AI, using more AAM ear tags, and smaller herd sizes resulted in a net loss when switching from TAI to AAM. The AAM system resulted in exceptional P/AI and may be an economically viable alternative to improve heifer reproductive efficiency in herds with suboptimal P/AI to TAI.

Economic impact of adding a second prostaglandin F2α treatment during an Ovsynch protocol using a meta-analytical assessment and a stochastic simulation model

Incomplete luteal regression after treatment with a single dose of PGF_2α during an Ovsynch protocol decreases fertility to timed artificial insemination (AI). An additional treatment with PGF_2α 24 h after the first dose has been recommended to increase the proportion of cows with complete luteal regression and subsequent pregnancy per AI (P/AI). This is, however, associated with additional costs of labor and product. The objective was to develop a stochastic partial budget model to estimate the economic impact of an additional PGF_2α treatment on d 8 during an Ovsynch protocol in primiparous and multiparous cows. A systematic review of the literature and a meta-analytical assessment was performed to evaluate the effects of adding a second PGF_2α treatment during the Ovsynch protocol on P/AI in lactating dairy cows. Thirteen randomized controlled experiments from 11 published manuscripts including 9,735 cows were used. We were able to retrieve information regarding parity from 9 experiments from 7 manuscripts (2,367 primiparous cows and 5,356 multiparous cows). An additional dose of PGF_2α yielded a 5.60 risk difference in P/AI [95% confidence interval (CI) = 3.69-7.52]. In primiparous cows and multiparous cows, an additional dose of PGF_2α yielded a 4.24 (95% CI = 0.31-8.17) and a 5.31 risk difference in P/AI (95% CI = 2.75-7.87). Revenue was based on the associated improvement in reproductive performance because of an increase in P/AI multiplied by the value of a pregnancy (PGVAL). Median PGVAL was €252, ranging from €42 (fifth percentile) to €623 (95th percentile). Based on parity, median PGVAL was €205 (5th percentile = €43; 95th percentile = €651) and €264 (5th percentile = €88; 95th percentile = €598) for primiparous (n = 1,252) and multiparous cows (n = 3,003), respectively. Using a stochastic simulation model with 10,000 iterations, adding a second PGF_2α dose on d 8 was more profitable (€7.76/cow; 5th percentile = €0.01; 95th percentile = €29.40) compared with a single PGF_2α administration on d 7. In primiparous cows, adding a second PGF_2α treatment was more profitable (€1.99/cow; 5th percentile = -€3.08; 95th percentile = €22.52) in 67% of all simulated iterations. In multiparous cows, adding a second PGF_2α treatment was more profitable (€7.92/cow; 5th percentile = -€0.09; 95th percentile = €28.22) in 95% of all simulated iterations. In conclusion, there was a clear benefit of an additional PGF_2α treatment during the Ovsynch protocol on P/AI (+5.6 percentage units). Despite additional costs for hormones and labor, an additional treatment with PGF_2α on d 8 was more profitable in 95% of all scenarios because of the associated increase in fertility. It turned out, however, that adding a second PGF_2α treatment was more profitable in multiparous cows compared with primiparous cows.