Cross-sectional analyses of a national database to determine if superior genetic merit translates to superior dairy cow performance

Impact on prime animal beef merit from breeding solely for lighter dairy cows

As the proportion of prime carcasses originating from dairy herds increases, the focus is shifting to the beef merit of the progeny from dairy herds. Several dairy cow total merit indexes include a negative weight on measures of cow size. However, there is a lack of knowledge on the impact of genetic selection, solely for lighter or smaller-sized dairy cows, on the beef performance of their progeny. Therefore, the objective of this study was to quantify the genetic correlations among cow size traits (i.e., cow body weight (BW), cow carcass weight (CW)), cow body condition score (BCS), cow carcass conformation (CC), and cow carcass fat cover (CF), as well as the correlations between these cow traits and a series of beef performance slaughter-related traits (i.e., CW, CC, CF, and age at slaughter (AS)) in their progeny. After data editing, there were 52,950 cow BW and BCS records, along with 57,509 cow carcass traits (i.e., CW, CC, and CF); carcass records from 346,350 prime animals along with AS records from 316,073 prime animals were also used. Heritability estimates ranged from moderate to high (0.18 to 0.62) for all cow and prime animal traits. The same carcass trait in cows and prime animals were strongly genetically correlated with each other (0.76 to 0.85), implying that they are influenced by very similar genomic variants. Selecting exclusively for cows with higher BCS (i.e., fatter) will, on average, produce more conformed prime animals carcasses, owing to a moderate genetic correlation (0.30) between both traits. Genetic correlations revealed that selecting exclusively for lighter BW or CW cows will, on average, result in lighter prime animal carcasses of poor CC, while also delaying slaughter age. Nonetheless, selective breeding through total merit indexes should be successful in breeding for smaller dairy cows, and desirable prime animal carcass traits concurrently, because of the non-unity genetic correlations between the cow and prime animal traits; this will help to achieve a more ethical, environmentally sustainable, and economically viable dairy-beef industry.

Mean breed performance of the progeny from beef-on-dairy matings

Gains through breeding can be achieved through a combination of both between-breed and within-breed selection. Two suites of traits of particular interest to dairy producers when selecting beef bulls for mating to dairy females are calving-related attributes and the expected value of the subsequent calf, the latter usually being a function of expected carcass value. Estimated breed effects can be informative, particularly in the absence of across-breed genetic evaluations. The objective of the present study was to use a large national database of the progeny from beef-on-dairy matings to estimate the mean breed effects of the used beef sires. Calving performance (i.e., gestation length, calving difficulty score, and perinatal morality) as well as calf value were investigated; a series of slaughter-related traits (i.e., carcass metrics and age at slaughter) of the prime progeny were also investigated. Phenotypic data on up to 977,037 progeny for calving performance, 79,903 for calf price and 103,175 for carcass traits (including dairy × dairy progeny for comparative purposes) were used; sire breeds represented were Holstein-Friesian, Angus, Aubrac, Belgian Blue, Charolais, Hereford, Limousin, Salers, and Simmental. Large interbreed differences existed. The mean gestation length of male calves from beef sires varied from 282.3 d (Angus) to 287.4 d (Limousin) which were all longer than the mean of 280.9 d for Holstein-Friesian sired male calves. Relative to a Holstein-Friesian sire, the odds of dystocia varied from 1.43 (Angus) to 4.77 (Belgian Blue) but, once adjusted for both the estimated maternal genetic merit of the dam and direct genetic merit of the calf for calving difficulty, the range in odds ratios shrunk. A difference of €125.4 existed in calf sale price between the progeny of the different beef breeds investigated which represented over twice the residual standard deviation in calf price within the day of sale-Angus was the cheapest while Charolais calves were, on average, the most expensive calves. Mean carcass weight of steers, not adjusted for age at slaughter or carcass fat, varied from 327.1 kg (Angus) to 363.2 kg (Belgian Blue) for the beef breeds with the mean carcass weight of Holstein-Friesian steer progeny being 322.4 kg. Belgian Blues had, on average, the best carcass conformation with the Herefords and Angus having the worst of all beef breeds. Angus and Hereford steers were slaughtered the youngest of all beef breeds but just 9 d younger than the average of all other beef breeds yet 24 d younger than Holstein-Friesian sired progeny. Clear breed differences in calving and carcass performance exist among beef breeds mated to dairy females. Those breeds excelling in calving performance were not necessarily the best for carcass merit.

[The lipidosis in the liver of the dairy cow: Part 2 Genetic predisposition and prophylaxis]

Hepatic lipidosis in dairy cows is the result of a disturbed balance between the uptake of non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA), their metabolism in the hepatocytes, and the limited efflux of TG as very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL). Lipidosis and the associated risk for ketosis represents a consequence of selecting dairy cows primarily for milk production without considering the basic physiological mechanisms of this trait. The overall risk for lipidosis and ketosis possesses a genetic background and the recently released new breeding value of the German Holstein Friesian cows now sets the path for correction of this risk and in that confirms the assumed genetic threat. Ectopic fat deposition in the liver is the result of various steps including lipolysis, uptake of fat by the liver cell, its metabolism, and finally release as very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL). These reactions may be modulated directly or indirectly and hence, serve as basis for prophylactic measures. The pertaining methods are described in order to support an improved understanding of the pathogenesis of lipidosis and ketosis. They consist of feeding a glucogenic diet, restricted feeding during the close-up time as well as supplementation with choline, niacin, carnitine, or the reduction of milking frequency. Prophylactic measures for the prevention of ketosis are also included in this discussion.

Early detection of subclinical mastitis in lactating dairy cows using cow-level features

Subclinical mastitis in cows affects their health, well-being, longevity, and performance, leading to reduced productivity and profit. Early prediction of subclinical mastitis can enable dairy farmers to perform interventions to mitigate its effect. The present study investigated how well predictive models built using machine learning techniques can detect subclinical mastitis up to 7 d before its occurrence. The data set used consisted of 1,346,207 milk-day (i.e., a day when milk was collected on both morning and evening) records spanning 9 yr from 2,389 cows producing on 7 Irish research farms. Individual cow composite milk yield and maximum milk flow were available twice daily, whereas milk composition (i.e., fat, lactose, protein) and somatic cell count (SCC) were collected once per week. Other features describing parity, calving dates, predicted transmitting ability for SCC, body weight, and history of subclinical mastitis were also available. The results of the study showed that a gradient boosting machine model trained to predict the onset of subclinical mastitis 7 d before a subclinical case occurs achieved a sensitivity and specificity of 69.45 and 95.64%, respectively. Reduced data collection frequency, where milk composition and SCC were recorded only every 15, 30, 45, and 60 d was simulated by masking data, to reflect the frequency of recording of this data on commercial dairy farms in Ireland. The sensitivity and specificity scores reduced as recording frequency reduced with respective scores of 66.93 and 80.43% when milk composition and SCC were recorded just every 60 d. Results demonstrate that models built on data that could be recorded routinely available on commercial dairy farms, can achieve useful predictive ability of subclinical mastitis even with reduced frequency of milk composition and SCC recording.

The response to genetic merit for milk production in dairy cows differs by cow body weight

•

Heavier cows yield more milk, fat, and protein.

•

The association between genetic merit for milk yield and actual yield differs by BW.

•

The association between genetic merit for milk composition and actual composition does not differ by BW.

Attention is increasing on both cow size and body weight (BW) as energy sinks and thus as contributors to differences in production efficiency among cows. What is not currently clear, however, is how cow BW affects the increase in yield per cow per unit increase in genetic merit for milk production. This void in knowledge was filled in the present study using BW data from 20,470 lactations on 16,980 Holstein-Friesian dairy cows stratified into 4 groups on BW adjusted for differences in parity, days in milk, and body condition score. Using linear mixed models that adjusted for nuisance factors, cow phenotypic milk production variables were regressed on estimates of parental average genetic merit for the respective trait within each stratum of BW defined within contemporary group; estimates of genetic merit were from the national genetic evaluations. Both the intercept and linear regression coefficients on genetic merit were compared across BW strata. The intercepts representing the mean phenotypic yield at a genetic merit of zero differed among BW strata; irrespective of yield trait, the least squares means yield per BW stratum increased numerically as cows got heavier, although not every stepwise increase in BW stratum was associated with significantly greater yield compared with the previous (lighter) stratum. Nonetheless, the yield of the cows in the lightest of the 4 strata was always less than that of the heaviest 2 strata; relative to the lightest stratum, cows in the heaviest BW stratum produced only 3 to 4% more yield. Furthermore, the association between phenotypic yield and its respective measures of genetic merit differed by BW stratum; the response to selection for each of the yield traits was 15 to 23% greater for the heaviest stratum of cows compared with their contemporaries in the lightest stratum. Although BW stratum was associated with mean fat and protein concentration after adjusting for differences in genetic merit for fat and protein concentration, the association did not differ by BW stratum for either fat or protein concentration. The effect of BW on efficiency should consider the association between BW and not only mean phenotypic yield at a given genetic merit, but also how the differences in yield diverge as genetic merit increases.

Sensory Consumer and Descriptive Analysis of Steaks from Beef Animals Selected from Tough and Tender Animal Genotypes: Genetic Meat Quality Traits Can Be Detected by Consumers

The objective of the present study was to determine if animals who were genetically divergent in the predicted tenderness of their meat actually produced more tender meat, as well as what the implications were for other organoleptic properties of the meat. The parental average genetic merit for meat tenderness was used to locate 20 “Tough genotype” heifers and 17 “Tender genotype” heifers; M. longissimus thoracis steaks from all heifers were subjected to sensory affective analysis (140 consumers) and sensory profiling using two trained sensory panels. All sample steaks were treated identically regarding pre- and post-mortem handling, storage, cooking and presentation (i.e., randomised, blind coded). For the affective consumer study, eight steaks were sectioned from the same location of the striploin muscles from each of the heifers. In total, 108 steaks from the Tender genotype and 118 from the Tough genotype were tested in the consumer study to determine the preference or liking of these steaks for appearance, aroma, flavour, tenderness, juiciness and overall acceptability. The consumer study found that the Tender genotype scored higher (p < 0.0001) for liking of tenderness, juiciness, flavour and overall acceptability compared to the Tough genotype. Similar results were generally found for the separate consumer age cohorts (18–64 years) with lower sensory acuity in the 65+ age cohort. For the descriptive analysis, the Tender genotype scored numerically more tender, juicy and flavoursome, although the differences were only significant for one of the panels. The critical outcome from this study is that parental average genetic merit can be used to pre-select groups of animals for tenderness, which, in turn, can be detected by consumers.

Prediction of genetic merit for live weight and body condition score in dairy cows using routinely available linear type and carcass data

Accurate estimates of genetic merit for both live weight and body condition score (BCS) could be useful additions to both national- and herd-breeding programs. Although recording live weight and BCS is not technologically arduous, data available for use in routine genetic evaluations are generally lacking. The objective of the present study was to explore the usefulness of routinely recorded data, namely linear type traits (which also included BCS but only assessed visually) and carcass traits in the pursuit of genetic evaluations for both live weight and BCS in dairy cows. The data consisted of on-farm records of live weight and BCS (assessed using both visual and tactile cues) from 33,242 dairy cows in 201 commercial Irish herds. These data were complemented with information on 6 body-related linear type traits (i.e., stature, angularity, chest width, body depth, BCS, and rump width) and 3 cull cow carcass measures (i.e., carcass weight, conformation, and fat cover) on a selection of these animals plus close relatives. (Co)variance components were estimated using animal linear mixed models. The genetic correlation between the type traits stature, angularity, body depth, chest width, rump width, and visually-assessed BCS with live weight was 0.68, -0.28, 0.43, 0.64, 0.61, and 0.44, respectively. The genetic correlation between angularity and BCS measured on farm (based on both visual and tactile appraisal) was -0.79; the genetic and phenotypic correlation between BCS assessed visually as part of the linear assessment with BCS assessed by producers using both tactile and visual cues was 0.90 and 0.27, respectively. The genetic (phenotypic) correlation between cull cow carcass weight and live weight was 0.81 (0.21), and the genetic (phenotypic) correlation between cull cow carcass fat cover and BCS assessed on live cows was 0.44 (0.12). Estimated breeding values (EBV) for live weight and BCS in a validation population of cows were generated using a multitrait evaluation with observations for just the type traits, just the carcass traits, and both the type traits and carcass traits; the EBV were compared with the respective live weight and BCS phenotypic observations. The regression of phenotypic live weight on its EBV from the multitrait evaluations was 1.00 (i.e., the expectation) when the EBV was generated using just linear type trait data, but less than 1 (0.83) when using just carcass data. However, the regression changed across parities and stages of lactation. The partial correlation (after adjusting for contemporary group, parity by stage of lactation, heterosis, and recombination loss) between phenotypic live weight and EBV for live weight estimated using the 3 different scenarios (i.e., type only, carcass only, type plus carcass) ranged from 0.38 to 0.43. Although the prediction of phenotypic BCS from its respective EBV was relatively good when using just the linear type trait data (regression coefficient of 0.83 with a partial correlation of 0.22), the predictive ability of BCS EBV based on just carcass data was poor and should not be used. Overall, linear type trait data are a useful source of information to predict live weight and BCS with minimal additional predictive value from also including carcass data. Nonetheless, in the absence of linear type trait data, information on carcass traits can be useful in predicting genetic merit for mature cow live weight. Prediction of cow BCS from cow carcass data is not recommended.