Correlated response of udder dimensions to selection for milk yield in Holsteins

Prediction of some milk production traits using udder and teat measurements with a spotlight on their genetic background in Friesian cows

The aggregate udder shape (Bowl, Round, Cup), udder measurements (udder width, UW, udder front depth, UFD, udder rear depth, URD, udder levelness, ULV, udder heights, UH) and teat measurements (teat diameters, TD, front teat length, FTL, rear teat length, RTL, distance between front teats, DFT and distance between rear teats, DRT) were measured on 1300 Friesian cows located in a commercial farm under subtropical conditions (Egypt) to appraise udder and teats status and to evaluate the possible relationships with some milk production characteristics in conjunction with udder shape, age at first calving, sire and inbreeding effects on udder morphological traits and milk production ability. For such an available sample size, parity had affected (P < 0.01) UFD, TD, FTL and RTL. In addition, udder shape affected (P < 0.01) UW, UFD, URD, ULV and DFT. None of the other studied factors affected milk production traits. The bowl udder shape (P < 0.01) yielded a high total milk yield (3267.19 kg), adjusted milk yield (2443.01 kg) and lactation length (480.70 d) compared to other udder shapes. The genetic correlations of UW with total milk yield and persistency were strongly positive (0.86 and 0.93, respectively). However, strong negative genetic correlations were found between UW with peak milk yield and lactation length (- 0.92 and - 0.80, respectively), between RTL with peak milk yield (- 0.92) and DRT with persistency (- 0.79). As found from the stepwise multiple regression, UW and URD can be used as good indicators for predicting milk yield and lactation length. Additionally, this study spotlights the genetic background of udder characteristics based on reliable studies and the QTL database for cattle as a first step toward applying this knowledge side by side with phenotypic traits to improve the productivity of the Holstein breed under subtropical conditions.

TRIENNIAL LACTATION SYMPOSIUM/BOLFA: Mammary growth during pregnancy and lactation and its relationship with milk yield

The number of secretory cells in the mammary gland is often cited as a major determinant of milk production. However, literature data for proxy measures of secretory cell number do not fully support such a claim. In particular, measurements of total mammary DNA in livestock explain only <25% of variation in milk yield, probably because of tissue heterogeneity for DNA concentration. Relative to BW, measurements of udder size in dairy cattle, as total DNA or udder weight, are approximately double those seen in most other livestock classes. Therefore, selection for dairy production, not surprisingly, has resulted in cows with greater secretory capacity. There is limited evidence that genetic selection is still increasing udder size in some cattle populations, but more recent data are needed. It is contended that the most important period of mammary growth for determination of milk yield is that occurring in pregnancy and early lactation. Mammary development is largely complete, at term, in sheep, goats, and cattle, but in pigs, the udder continues to grow during the first 3 wk of lactation, depending, in part, on litter size. Increased litter size in sheep and goats will enhance the extent of mammary development at the end of gestation (and milk yield) by 20 to 25%. However, twinning in dairy cattle does not affect milk production and, by inference only, is not likely to affect numbers of secretory cells at term. Milking frequency and suckling intensity in very early lactation will increase milk yield in cows and increase mammogenesis and milk yield in sheep, indicating that even at term, the ruminant gland retains some capacity for further development, if demand requires it. There is limited understanding of the hormonal signals in pregnancy that regulate mammary development relative to the number of young carried. Furthermore, the genetic differences between dairy and beef cattle that lead to substantially greater udder size in the dairy breeds have not been identified. During lactation, the drivers for secretory cell loss in relation to milking frequency and nutritional status are still not known. Measurement of mammary development and using this phenotype in genomewide association studies to identify key genetic variants for mammogenesis will provide knowledge that is fundamental to understanding the quantitative regulation of milk production.

Effects of genetic selection for milk yield on somatotropin, insulin-like growth factor-I, and placental lactogen in Holstein cows

Cows from static, low-merit control (CL) and contemporary, high-merit select (SL) lines that differed in milk yield by more than 4,000 kg/305-d lactation (SL > CL) were used to determine effects of selection for milk yield on blood serum concentrations of somatotropin (ST), insulin-like growth factor (IGF-I), and placental lactogen (PL). Cows were exposed to the same environment and management conditions and fed the same diets. Serum and milk samples were collected from primiparous (18 CL, 18 SL) and multiparous (12 CL, 18 SL) cows relative to day of lactation (from -28 to 280 d for nonpregnant cows and to subsequent calving for cows that conceived). Data were analyzed as repeated measures using mixed model procedures. Serum ST increased at calving, remained elevated for a longer interval in SL than in CL cows, and was greater in SL than in CL cows. Serum IGF-I decreased at calving, remained low through 14 DIM, and gradually returned to precalving concentrations as lactation progressed. Postpartum concentrations of IGF-I were less in SL than CL through 84 DIM and were similar through the remainder of lactation, resulting in a line by day interaction. Serum IGF-I and PL were not affected by merit during gestation. There was an interaction of merit and postconception interval on IGF-I, with the difference in IGF-I concentration between lines decreasing as gestation progressed. Change in serum IGF-I and PL appeared to be synchronous. Results indicate that selection for milk yield increased serum ST, prolonged the postpartum reduction in serum IGF-I, and did not alter serum PL. Results also indicate a positive relationship between PL and IGF-I and support the concept that PL plays a role in the regulation of serum IGF-I during gestation.

Influence of milking frequency on the productivity of dairy cows

Benefits and issues of changing milking frequency from the traditional twice a day are reviewed. Increased efficiency through dairy automation and mechanisation, and the desire to utilise advances in genetic selection, have made milking more frequently than twice a day an attractive option for some farmers. The size of the response to increased milking frequency appeared not to be related to existing milk yield, with the average response to increasing the frequency from 2 to 3 times a day being 3.5–3.8 kg/day. Labour is the single most important cost associated with the decision to increase milking frequency. For this reason, automated milking systems may hold the key to the long-term profitability of challenging cows to produce to their genetic potential. In contrast, reducing milking frequency to once a day has been used to reduce stress on underfed cows or for lifestyle and/or labour considerations. Short-term experiments indicate an average production loss of 21% for once daily relative to twice daily milking. Full lactation experiments suggest greater losses of 35–50%, but there is evidence that cows can adapt to longer milking intervals and this, coupled with increased stocking rate and care to maximise milk removal, may restrict yield losses to less than 10% on a whole-farm basis.

Direct and correlated responses to selection for milk yield: results and conclusions of regional project NC-2, "improvement of dairy cattle through breeding, with emphasis on selection". NC-2 Technical Committee

Measurement of direct and correlated responses to single-trait selection for milk yield was the major objective of regional project NC-2. The NC-2 Technical Committee included representatives from Alaska, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Nebraska, South Dakota, Wisconsin, and the USDA. All representatives, except Illinois, Kansas and Nebraska, maintained a selection line formed by using AI sires selected for high estimated transmitting abilities for milk and a second line that served as some type of a control. Stations varied in criteria for selection of bulls for control lines. Farms were managed similarly, including feeding and management of selection and control lines as one herd, random mating within line, and restricted culling policies. Selection for milk yield effectively increased milk production. All selection lines increased milk and net income per lactation more than control lines. Realized gains matched or exceeded gains expected from estimates of breeding values. Yields of milk components increased, but component percentages decreased appreciably for selection lines. Reproduction of nulliparous animals was not affected, but days open for lactating selection cows increased in some of the individual projects. Selected cows tended to have larger health costs, specifically for mammary treatment. Udder and conformation traits did not deteriorate for selection lines, although control lines with selection of sires on genetic evaluations for type received higher type scores. There should be few reservations about undesirable responses correlated with selection for milk yield.

Intercorrelations among milk production traits and body and udder measurements in Holstein heifers

Data from 1341 Holstein heifers of 71 sires were used to study heritabilities of and genetic and phenotypic correlations among milk production traits (308-d milk, front and rear half yields), body measurements (heart girth, withers height, body length, and rump length), udder measurements (front teat length and diameter, rear teat length and diameter, teat distance and udder height), and age at first calving. Genetic and phenotypic parameters were estimated by the multitrait restricted maximum likelihood method. Multitrait estimates of heritability ranged from .37 to .47 for first lactation yield traits, from .19 to .51 for body measurements, and from .08 to .41 for udder measurements. Age at first calving averaged 22.3 mo with a heritability estimate of .11. Milk production traits were all positively correlated with body measurements, suggesting that high producing heifers would be taller, larger, and longer than low producing heifers. Multitrait estimates of genetic and phenotypic correlations between udder height and yield traits were all negative, suggesting that high producing heifers tend to have lower udders. Of four body measurements studied, rump length showed the greatest genetic correlations with yield traits. Among six udder measurements, udder height exhibited the highest degree of associations with yield traits. Thus, rump length and udder height merit greater attention for prediction of lactational performance.

Genetic methods of improving dairy cattle for the south: a review and prospects from Regional Project S-49

Objectives of Southern Regional Research Project S-49, comprising eight contributing experiment stations, are to determine direct response to selection in milk and the resultant correlated responses in nonyield traits, to define and evaluate selection criteria for total economic merit or profit, to quantify genetic and environmental components of underlying physiological characters responsible for genetic gains in economically important traits, to determine interactions of genotype by environment, and to estimate genetic values for males and females. More than 150 scientific articles from S-49 have been published in journals from 1975 to 1985. These results have contributed in a major way in identifying issues and understanding the genetic control of cow performance and economics of genetic improvement programs.