Consequences of the inscription of local breeds in protected designation of origin cow cheese specifications for the genetic management of the herds

In the mountainous areas of Europe with a humid climate, dairy cattle production is a major agricultural activity, and the milk is often processed into cheese according to protected designation of origin (PDO) specifications. We analyzed the extent to which PDO specifications and/or a mountain environment influence the spatial distribution of estimated breeding values (EBVs) of cows and the herd-year effects (HYEs) for milk yield (kg/lactation) and protein and fat contents (g/kg), as well as lactation ranks and calving months. The study focused on the northern French Alps. A total of 37 023 lactations, recorded in 2006, in 1153 herds were analyzed. The cows belonged to the Montbéliarde (21 516 lactations), Abondance (10 346 lactations) and Tarentaise (5161 lactations) breeds. The two factors of variation considered were the status of the commune where the farm was located in relation to PDO (three categories: area with no PDO, area with a PDO with no milk yield limit, area with a PDO with a milk yield limit) and 'mountain' environment (four categories based on the European regulation: plain, piedmont, mountain and high mountain). In the Abondance breed, the average lactation rank increased with an increase in production constraints due to the PDO or to a mountain environment. In the Abondance and Tarentaise breeds, grouping of calving in winter was most marked in the 'PDO with a milk yield limit' and 'high-mountain' categories. In the Tarentaise breed, no significant effect on any trait and any variable was found in the 'PDO' or 'mountain' categories. In the other two breeds, the average EBV for milk yield decreased with an increase in the constraints due to PDO, with differences of 226 and 93 kg between extreme values in the Abondance and Montbéliarde breeds, respectively. The average HYE for milk yield was higher in the Abondance breed in the 'PDO with no milk yield limit' category than in the other categories (+740 and +1110 kg, respectively); HYE was not affected by the 'PDO' factor in the Montbéliarde breed or by the 'mountain' factor in either breed. Concerning the protein and fat contents, the effect of the 'PDO' and 'mountain' factors depended on the trait, the variable and the breed. The proportion of individual decisions (the farmer makes the decision) v. collective decisions (breed management) concerning herd dynamics in the face of existing constraints is discussed.

Associations between winter herd management factors and milk protein yield in Ontario dairy herds

A questionnaire was used to investigate associations between farm management practices in winter and milk protein yield. The questionnaire was completed by 500 dairy producers in Ontario, Canada in March 1994. A high positive correlation (0.96) existed between herd mean for protein yield per day per cow and herd mean for milk yield per day per cow. Therefore, most management practices that were associated with the farm mean for protein yield per day per cow were also associated with the farm mean for milk yield per day per cow. After adjustment for farm mean milk and fat yields, farms that housed dry cows as a separate group had higher mean protein yields than did herds that housed dry cows with the milking herd or the bred heifers. A positive association existed between herd mean for days of lactation and protein yield. Because of the correlation between milk and protein yields, these associations were of small magnitude. Thus, the potential benefit of progressive practices in herd management are primarily related to increased yields of milk and milk components in general rather than specifically to an increase in protein yield.

Effects of feeding practices on milk fat concentration for dairy cows

Thirty-seven dairy farms, using high producing (7500 kg/yr per cow on average) Montbéliarde cows that were fed hay-based rations, were included in a detailed survey involving the structure of the farm and the herd, the quality of forage, the feeding practices in winter and summer, and genetic characteristics of the cows (breeding values and herd effects). These data were used to analyze variation in milk fat concentration among farms, particularly variation linked to environmental factors, as assessed by the herd effect. When farms were ranked according to herd effect of fat concentration, farms with the highest herd effects fed concentrate to cows in rolled form, distributed forage before or with the concentrate, and provided hay in the trough in summer. The effects of such practices on digestive phenomena in the rumen are discussed. This study supported the use of herd effects to identify factors related to variation in dairy cow performance.