Quantitative evaluation of movement and strength of the upper limb after transection of the C-7 nerve: is it possible in an animal model?

Brachial plexus nerve injury and repair in a rabbit model part II: Does middle trunk injury result in loss of biceps function while repair results in recovery of biceps function

INTRODUCTION

There is conflicting anatomic and innervation data regarding the rabbit brachial plexus injury model. This study aims to validate a rabbit brachial plexus injury model. We hypothesize the middle trunk (C6, C7) is the primary innervation of the biceps, and when cut and unrepaired, would demonstrate lack of recovery and when repaired would demonstrate evidence of recovery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty two male New Zealand white rabbits (3-4 kg) underwent unilateral surgical division of the middle trunk. Five rabbits were randomly assigned to the "no-repair" group while the remaining 17 rabbits underwent direct coaptation ("repair" group). Rabbits were followed for 12 weeks, with ultrasound measurement of biceps cross-sectional area performed preoperatively, and at 4, 8, and 12 weeks postoperatively. At a euthanasia procedure, bilateral compound muscle action potential (CMAP) and isometric tetanic force (ITF) were measured. Bilateral biceps muscles were harvested and wet muscle weight was recorded. The operative side was expressed as a percentage of the non-operated side, and differences between the no repair and repair rabbits were statistically compared.

RESULTS

The repair group demonstrated significantly higher CMA (23.3 vs. 0%, p < .05), ITF (25.6 vs. 0%, p < .05), and wet muscle weight (65.8 vs. 52.0%, p < .05) as compared to the unrepaired group. At 4 weeks postoperatively, ultrasound-measured cross-sectional area of the biceps demonstrated atrophy in both groups. At 12 weeks, the repair group had a significantly larger cross-sectional area as compared to the no-repair group (89.1 vs. 59.3%, p < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

This injury model demonstrated recovery with repair and lack of function without repair. Longer survival time is recommended for future investigations.

Validation of Isometric Tetanic Force as a Measure of Muscle Recovery After Nerve Injury in the Rabbit Biceps

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to describe and validate a technique for measurement of isometric tetanic force (ITF) in the rabbit biceps muscle.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighteen New Zealand White rabbits were randomized to test either the right side or the left side first. Under propofol anesthesia, the brachial plexus and biceps brachii were exposed. The middle trunk (C6, C7) was secured in a bipolar electrode. Compound muscle action potential (CMAP) was measured. The proximal, tendinous portion of the biceps was severed at the shoulder and clamped in a custom-made force transducer. Muscle preload and electrical stimulation variables were optimized to obtain the highest tetanic muscle contraction. Wet muscle weight (WMW) and nerve histomorphometry were analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed to determine side-to-side equivalence.

RESULTS

The rabbit biceps muscle force demonstrated side-to-side equivalence with overlapping 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). The right side, expressed as a percentage of the left, averaged 99.69% (95% CI, 88.89%-110.5%). The WMW of the right expressed as a percentage of the left was 98.9% (95% CI, 95.8%-102%).

CONCLUSIONS

The ITF is equivalent from side to side in the rabbit as demonstrated by the high degree of overlap in the 95% CIs for each side. The width of the 95% CI implies that there is more variability in the rabbit upper extremity than for the lower extremity of the rabbit or rat models, and researchers should take this into account when performing sample size estimates in pre-experimental planning.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The rabbit biceps muscle ITF measurements can be used to measure motor recovery in a rabbit model of brachial plexus injury and compared with the contralateral uninjured side.