Endfolium sclerosis in temporal lobe epilepsy diagnosed preoperatively by 3-tesla magnetic resonance imaging

Improving surgical outcome with electric source imaging and high field magnetic resonance imaging

While most patients with focal epilepsy present with clear structural abnormalities on standard, 1.5 or 3 T MRI, some patients are MRI-negative. For those, quantitative MRI techniques, such as volumetry, voxel-based morphometry, and relaxation time measurements can aid in finding the epileptogenic focus. High-field MRI, just recently approved for clinical use by the FDA, increases the resolution and, in several publications, was shown to improve the detection of focal cortical dysplasias and mild cortical malformations. For those cases without any tissue abnormality in neuroimaging, even at 7 T, scalp EEG alone is insufficient to delimitate the epileptogenic zone. They may benefit from the use of high-density EEG, in which the increased number of electrodes helps improve spatial sampling. The spatial resolution of even low-density EEG can benefit from electric source imaging techniques, which map the source of the recorded abnormal activity, such as interictal epileptiform discharges, focal slowing, and ictal rhythm. These EEG techniques help localize the irritative, functional deficit, and seizure-onset zone, to better estimate the epileptogenic zone. Combining those technologies allows several drug-resistant cases to be submitted to surgery, increasing the odds of seizure freedom and providing a must needed hope for patients with epilepsy.

Is additional mesial temporal resection necessary for intractable epilepsy with cavernous malformations in the temporal neocortex?

PURPOSE

Cavernous malformation (CM) in the temporal neocortex causes intractable epilepsy. Whether to resect additional mesial temporal structures in addition to the lesionectomy is a still controversial issue. To clarify the need for the procedure, we retrospectively analyzed pre- and postoperative clinical data of patients with surgically removed CM.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

We included data from 18 patients with CM in the temporal neocortex who presented with intractable epilepsy. Eleven patients of our early series were treated with extended resection, i.e., lesionectomy and the resection of additional mesial temporal structures. Seven patients underwent lesionectomy, i.e., removal of the CM and of hemosiderin-stained surrounding brain tissue. Pathological assessments of the resected hippocampus were performed. Chronic intracranial electroencephalography (EEG) recordings were obtained in 6 patients. We performed perioperative neuropsychological assessments in all patients.

RESULTS

The seizure outcome was recorded as Engel class I in 17 patients (94.4%); Ia = 12 (66.7%) Ib = 2 (11.1%), Ic = 1 (5.6%), Id = 2 (11.1%), and class IIb in one patient (5.6%). Adding resection of the mesial temporal structures to lesionectomy did not alter the seizure outcome. Pathology of hippocampus revealed limited neuronal loss in CA4. Ictal onsets in the ipsilateral lateral cortex were detected in all 6 patients who underwent intracranial EEG. In 4 patients each, we also detected ictal onsets from the ipsilateral mesial temporal structures and from the contralateral temporal lobe. Postoperatively, in the patients where their CM was located in the language-dominant hemisphere (n = 10), the full-scale intelligence quotient (IQ) and the performance IQ increased (p < 0.05), whereas the verbal memory (WMS-R) deteriorated in two of 5 patients.

CONCLUSION

Excellent seizure outcomes were obtained even the lesionectomy alone. To confirm appropriate surgical strategy for lateral temporal CM with intractable epilepsy, further studies in large sample size are needed.

Non-invasive Evaluation for Epilepsy Surgery

Epilepsy surgery is aimed to remove the brain tissues that are indispensable for generating patient's epileptic seizures. There are two purposes in the pre-operative evaluation: localization of the epileptogenic zone and localization of function. Surgery is planned to remove possible epileptogenic zone while preserving functional area. Since no single diagnostic modality is superior to others in identifying and localizing the epileptogenic zone, multiple non-invasive evaluations are performed to estimate the location of the epileptogenic zone after concordance between evaluations. Essential components of non-invasive pre-surgical evaluation of epilepsy include detailed clinical history, long-term video-electroencephalography monitoring, epilepsy-protocol magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and neuropsychological testing. However, a significant portion of drug-resistant epilepsy is associated with no or subtle MRI lesions or with ambiguous electro-clinical signs. Additional evaluations including fluoro-deoxy glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET), magnetoencephalography and ictal single photon emission computed tomography can play critical roles in planning surgery. FDG-PET should be registered on three-dimensional MRI for better detection of focal cortical dysplasia. All diagnostic tools are complementary to each other in defining the epileptogenic zone, so that it is always important to reassess the data based on other results to pick up or confirm subtle abnormalities.

[Structural magnetic resonance imaging in epilepsy]

Magnetic resonance imaging is the main structural imaging in epilepsy. In patients with focal seizures, detection (and characterization) of a structural lesion consistent with electroclinical data allows therapeutic decisions without having to resort to other more expensive or invasive diagnostic procedures. The identification of some lesions may provide prognostic value, as in the case of Mesial Temporal Sclerosis (MTS) or may contribute to genetic counseling, as in the case of some Malformations of Cortical Development (MCD). The aim of this paper is to review the current state of structural MRI techniques, propose a basic protocol of epilepsy and mention the indications for structural MRI. Also, review the semiology of the main causes of epilepsy, with emphasis on MTS and MCD, by its highest frequency and by the special impact that MRI has shown in dealing with these entities.

Utility of 3-T FLAIR and 3D short tau inversion recovery MR imaging in the preoperative diagnosis of hippocampal sclerosis: direct comparison with 1.5-T FLAIR MR imaging

PURPOSE

To examine the utility of fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) imaging and three-dimensional short tau inversion recovery (3DSTIR) imaging using a 3-Tesla (3-T) magnetic resonance (MR) imager in the preoperative evaluation of hippocampal sclerosis (HS).

METHODS

Thirteen patients with intractable medial temporal lobe epilepsy who underwent anterior temporal lobectomy with amygdalohippocampectomy were studied. MR images were obtained twice, once with a 1.5-T imager and once with a 3-T imager. The extent of hippocampal resection was determined according to the findings on intraoperative hippocampal electroencephalography. We compared the diagnostic utility of FLAIR for HS between 1.5-T and 3-T MR imaging. In addition, the relationship between the existence of hypointense areas in the hippocampus (HIAs) on 3DSTIR and the severity of HS pathology (as evaluated using Watson's grading) was examined. The relationship between postoperative seizure outcome and postoperatively remaining HIAs was also evaluated.

RESULTS

There was no difference between FLAIR images from 1.5-T and 3-T imaging in the detection of HS. With 3DSTIR, an HIA in unilateral hippocampus was observed in all of the nine cases exhibiting severe pathologic HS (Watson's grade III-V). In seven cases with HIA, the extent of hippocampal resection was smaller than the HIAs. Every case showed good seizure outcome (Engel's class I and II).

DISCUSSION

In the diagnosis of HS, no substantial difference was noted between 1.5-T and 3-T MR imaging. However, 3DSTIR using 3-T MR imaging is useful for evaluating the extent of HS, although postoperative HS remnants are not correlated with surgical outcomes.