Techniques for cervical interbody grafting

Subsidence Performance of the Bioactive Glass-Ceramic (CaO-SiO2-P2O5-B2O3) Spacer in Terms of Modulus of Elasticity and Contact Area: Mechanical Test and Finite Element Analysis

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to evaluate the subsidence performance of a bioactive glass-ceramic (CaO-SiO2-P2O5-B2O3) spacer in terms of its modulus of elasticity and contact area using mechanical tests and finite element analysis.

METHODS

Three spacer three-dimensional models (Polyether ether ketone [PEEK]-C: PEEK spacer with a small contact area; PEEK-NF: PEEK spacer with a large contact area; and Bioactive glass [BGS]-NF: bioactive glass-ceramic spacer with a large contact area) are constructed and placed between bone blocks for compression analysis. The stress distribution, peak von Mises stress, and reaction force generated in the bone block are predicted by applying a compressive load. Subsidence tests are conducted for three spacer models in accordance with ASTM F2267. Three types of blocks measuring 8, 10, and 15 pounds per cubic foot are used to account for the various bone qualities of patients. A statistical analysis of the results is conducted using a one-way Analysis of variance and post hoc analysis (Tukey's Honestly Significant Difference) by measuring the stiffness and yield load.

RESULTS

The stress distribution, peak von Mises stress, and reaction force predicted via the finite element analysis are the highest for PEEK-C, whereas they are similar for PEEK-NF and BGS-NF. Results of mechanical tests show that the stiffness and yield load of PEEK-C are the lowest, whereas those of PEEK-NF and BGS-NF are similar.

CONCLUSIONS

The main factor affecting subsidence performance is the contact area. Therefore, bioactive glass-ceramic spacers exhibit a larger contact area and better subsidence performance than conventional spacers.

Factors influencing cage subsidence in anterior cervical corpectomy and discectomy: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Various factors have been examined in relation to cage subsidence risk, including cage material, cage geometry, bone mineral density, device type, surgical level, bone graft, and patient age. The present study aims to compare and synthesize the literature of both clinical and biomechanical studies to evaluate and present the factors associated with cage subsidence.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of the literature from January 2003 to December 2021 was conducted using the PubMed and ScienceDirect databases by following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Following the screening for inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 49 clinical studies were included. Correlations between clinical and biomechanical studies are also discussed.

RESULTS

Patients treated with the cage and plate combination had a lower subsidence rate than patients with the stand-alone cage. Overall, Polyetheretherketone material was shown to have a lower subsidence rate than titanium and other materials. The subsidence rate was also higher when the surgery was performed at levels C5-C7 than at levels C2-C5. No significant correlation was found between age and cage subsidence clinically.

CONCLUSIONS

Cage subsidence increases the stress on the anterior fixation system and may cause biomechanical instability. Severe cage subsidence decreases the Cobb angle and intervertebral height, which may cause destabilization of the implant system, such as screw/plate loosening or breakage of the screw/plate. Various factors have been shown to influence the risk of cage subsidence. Examining clinical research alongside biomechanical studies offers a more comprehensive understanding of the subject.

Quasi-static loading of glass fiber-reinforced composite cervical fusion cage

OBJECTIVES

Anterior decompression and fusion in cervical spine has become one of the most common procedures in neurosurgery. In the surgery, cervical cage implants made of different biomaterials are used. Our purpose was to create a cervical cage made of glass fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) filled with bioactive glass particles and to characterize its behavior in quasi-static compression/shear stress loading conditions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

FRC cages (n = 6) were manufactured with 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 layers of glass fiber laminates and thermoset dimethacrylate resin matrix resulting in wall thickness from 0.70 to 2.1 mm. Control cage was a commercial PEEK cage (CeSpaceXP) implant with asymmetrical wall thickness of up 4.0 mm. Interior of the cage was filled with glass particles of the size 500-1250 μm simulating the bioactive glass which are used in FRC cranial implants. The FRC cages were quasi-statically loaded (compressive/shear stress) at a constant speed of 1 mm/min in the air.

RESULTS

The average yield strength force (YF) of the control PEEK cage was 3483.6 N (±134.3 N). The average YFs for tested FRC cage with 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 layers of FRC fabric varied from 1336.5 N (±403.8 N) to 7675.0 N (±670.0 N), respectively. The average ultimate forces (UF) for tested FRC cages varied from 1535.8 N (±406.2 N) to 9975.0 N (±1492.4 N). With six layers of FRC fabric, YF of the FRC cage was comparable to the PEEK implants.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, it was demonstrated that it is possible to manufacture a cervical interbody fusion device made of FRC and filled with bioactive glass with proper load bearing capacities. Because of physical properties of FRC-bioactive glass, the FRC cage might have some advances compared to the state-of-the-art cages, like faster bony union and smaller rate of subsidence, which will be studied in the future.

Two-Year Clinical and Radiological Outcomes in Patients With Diabetes Undergoing Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

STUDY DESIGN

Secondary analysis of data from the multicenter, randomized, parallel-controlled Food and Drug Administration (FDA) investigational device exemption study.

OBJECTIVE

Studies on outcomes following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in individuals with diabetes are scarce. We compared 24-month radiological and clinical outcomes in individuals with and without diabetes undergoing single-level ACDF with either i-FACTOR or local autologous bone.

METHODS

Between 2006 and 2013, 319 individuals with single-level degenerative disc disease (DDD) and no previous fusion at the index level underwent ACDF. The presence of diabetes determined the 2 cohorts. Data collected included radiological fusion evaluation, neurological outcomes, Neck Disability Index (NDI), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores, and the 36-Item Short Form Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Physical and Mental component summary scores.

RESULTS

There were 35 individuals with diabetes (11.1%; average body mass index [BMI] = 32.99 kg/m²; SD = 5.72) and 284 without (average BMI = 28.32 kg/m²; SD = 5.67). The number of nondiabetic smokers was significantly higher than diabetic smokers: 73 (25.70%) and 3 (8.57%), respectively. Preoperative scores of NDI, VAS arm pain, and SF-36v2 were similar between the diabetic and nondiabetic participants at baseline; however, VAS neck pain differed significantly between the cohorts at baseline (P = .0089). Maximum improvement for NDI, VAS neck and arm pain, and SF-36v2 PCS and MCS scores was seen at 6 months in both cohorts and remained stable until 24 months.

CONCLUSIONS

ACDF is effective for cervical radiculopathy in patients with diabetes. Diabetes is not a contraindication for patients requiring single-level surgery for cervical DDD.

Comparison of the effectiveness and safety of bioactive glass ceramic to allograft bone for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with anterior plate fixation

Recently, a bioactive glass ceramic (BGC) has been developed for use as intervertebral cages for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). However, the effectiveness and safety of BGC cages remain to be evaluated. We completed a retrospective comparison of the radiological and clinical outcomes of 36 patients (52 levels) who underwent ACDF with a BGC cage and 35 patients (54 levels) using allograft bone. The following variables were compared between the two groups: the visual analog (VAS) neck and arm pain score and the neck disability index (NDI), measured before surgery and 1 year after; the change in Cobb's angle, between the C2 and C7 vertebrae, the global sagittal angle, and disc height compared from before surgery to 1 year after; and the rate of spinal fusion and cage subsidence at 1 and 2 years after surgery. The VAS and NDI scores were not different between the two groups. Similarly, the spinal fusion rate was not different between the BGC and allograft bone group at 1 year (73% and 87%, respectively; p = 0.07) and 2 years (94% and 91%, respectively; p = 0.54) after surgery. However, the rate of cage subsidence was higher in the allograft bone (43%) than the BGC (19%) group (p = 0.03), as was the rate of instrument-related failure (p = 0.028), with a specifically higher incidence of implant fracture or failure in the allograft bone group (p = 0.025). Overall, our findings indicate that BGC cages provide a feasible and safe alternative to allograft bone for ACDF.

Correlation Between Different Interbody Grafts and Pseudarthrosis After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Compared with Control Group: Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Cervical spine degenerative disease is one of the main causes of myelopathy. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is the most common surgical procedure used to treat cervical myelopathy. Therefore, it is important to study pseudarthrosis rates after ACDF and correlate them with the graft used.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review to evaluate the relationship between pseudarthrosis after ACDF and the interbody graft used.

RESULTS

A total of 3732 patients were evaluated in 46 studies. The mean age of the included patients was 51.5 ± 4.18 years (range, 42-59.6 years). ACDF is most often perforemd as single-level surgery and the level most impaired is C5-C6. The use of titanium cages, zero profile, recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2, and carbon cages was seen as a protective factor for pseudarthrosis compared with the autograft group (control group); with an odds ratio of 0.29, 0.51, 0.03, and 0.3, respectively; the results were statistically relevant. The use of polyetheretherketone, poly(methyl methacrylate), and trabecular metal was a risk factor for development of pseudarthrosis compared with the control group, with an odds ratio of 1.7, 8.7, and 6.8, respectively; the results were statistically relevant. Radiologic follow-up was an important factor for the pseudarthrosis rate; paradoxically, a short follow-up (<1 year) had lower rates of pseudarthrosis and follow-up >2 years increased the chance of finding pseudarthrosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Different types of grafts lead to a significant difference in pseudarthrosis rates. Follow-up time is also an important factor that affects the rate of pseudarthrosis after ACDF.

A single center retrospective clinical evaluation of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion comparing allograft spacers to silicon nitride cages

BACKGROUND

Iliac crest autograft or allograft spacers have been traditionally utilized in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) to provide vertebral stabilization and enhanced osteogenesis. However, abiotic cages have largely replaced these allogenic sources due to host-site morbidities and disease transmission risks, respectively. Although devices made of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) or titanium-alloys (Ti) have gained wide popularity, they lack osteoinductive or conductive capabilities. In contrast, silicon nitride (Si3N4) is a relatively new implant material that also provides structural stability and yet purportedly offers osteopromotive and antimicrobial behavior. This study compared radiographic outcomes at ≥12 months of follow-up for osseous integration, fusion rate, time to fusion, and subsidence in ACDF patients with differing intervertebral spacers.

METHODS

Fifty-eight ACDF patients (108 segments) implanted with Si3N4 cages were compared to thirty-four similar ACDF patients (61 segments) implanted with fibular allograft spacers. Lateral radiographs (normal, flexion, and extension) were obtained at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months to assess osseous integration, the presence of bridging bone, the absence of peri-implant radiolucencies, subsidence, and fusion using both interspinous distance (ISD) and Cobb angle methods.

RESULTS

In patients with ≥12 months of follow-up, fusion for the allograft spacers and Si3N4 cages was 86.84% and 96.83%, respectively (ISD method, P=0.10), and 67.65% and 84.13%, respectively (Cobb angle method P=0.07), while osseointegration was 76.32% and 93.65%, respectively (P=0.02). The time to fusion significantly favored the Si3N4 cages (4.08 vs. 8.64 months (ISD method, P=0.01), and 6.76 vs. 11.74 months (Cobb angle method, P=0.04). The assessed time for full osseointegration was 7.83 and 19.24 months for Si3N4 and allograft, respectively (P=0.00). Average subsidence at 1-year follow-up was 0.51 and 2.71 mm for the Si3N4 and allograft cohorts, respectively (P=0.00).

CONCLUSIONS

In comparison to fibular allograft spacers, Si3N4 cages showed earlier osseointegration and fusion, higher fusion rates, and less subsidence.

Single anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using self- locking stand-alone polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage: evaluation of pain and health-related quality of life

BACKGROUND

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) constitutes the conventional treatment of cervical disc herniation due to degenerative disc disease (DDD). ACDF with plating presents a variety of complications postoperatively and stand-alone cages are thought to be a promising alternative. The aim of this study was firstly, to analyze prospectively collected data from a sample of patients treated with single ACDF using C-Plus self-locking stand-alone PEEK cage system, without the use of plates or screws, in order to evaluate pain levels of patients, utilizing Neck and Arm Pain scale as an expression of visual analogue scale (VAS). Secondly, we aimed to evaluate health-related quality of life, via the short-form 36 (SF-36) and Neck Disability Index (NDI).

METHODS

Thirty-six patients (19 male and 17 female) with mean age 49.6±7 years old who underwent successful single ACDF using self-locking stand-alone PEEK cage for symptomatic cervical DDD were selected for the study. Neck and Arm pain, as well as SF-36 and NDI were estimated preoperatively and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Patients underwent preoperative and postoperative clinical, neurological and radiological evaluation.

RESULTS

The clinical and radiological outcomes were satisfactory after a minimum 1-year follow-up. All results were statistically important (P<0.05), excluding improvement in NDI measured between 6 and 12 months. SF-36, Neck Pain, as well as Arm Pain featured gradual and constant improvement during follow-up, with best scores presenting at 12 months after surgery, while NDI reached its best at 6 months postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Generally, all scores showed improvement postoperatively during the different phases of the follow-up. Subsequently, ACDF using C-Plus cervical cage constitutes an effective method for cervical disc herniation treatment, in terms of postoperative improvement on pain levels and health-related quality of life and a safe alternative to the conventional method of treatment for cervical DDD.

Clinical Application of Ceramics in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Review and Update

STUDY DESIGN

Narrative review.

OBJECTIVES

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a reliable procedure, commonly used for cervical degenerative disc disease. For interbody fusions, autograft was the gold standard for decades; however, limited availability and donor site morbidities have led to a constant search for new materials. Clinically, it has been shown that calcium phosphate ceramics, including hydroxyapatite (HA) and tricalcium phosphate (TCP), are effective as osteoconductive materials and bone grafts. In this review, we present the current findings regarding the use of ceramics in ACDF.

METHODS

A review of the relevant literature examining the clinical use of ceramics in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion procedures was conducted using PubMed, OVID and Cochrane.

RESULT

HA, coralline HA, sandwiched HA, TCP, and biphasic calcium phosphate ceramics were used in combination with osteoinductive materials such as bone marrow aspirate and various cages composed of poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK), fiber carbon, and titanium. Stand-alone ceramic spacers have been associated with fracture and cracks. Metallic cages such as titanium endure the risk of subsidence and migration. PEEK cages in combination with ceramics were shown to be a suitable substitute for autograft.

CONCLUSION

None of the discussed options has demonstrated clear superiority over others, although direct comparisons are often difficult due to discrepancies in data collection and study methodologies. Future randomized clinical trials are warranted before definitive conclusions can be drawn.

Appraisal of the Quality of Neurosurgery Clinical Practice Guidelines

OBJECTIVE

The rate of neurosurgery guidelines publications was compared over time with all other specialties. Neurosurgical guidelines and quality of supporting evidence were then analyzed and compared by subspecialty.

METHODS

The authors first performed a PubMed search for "Neurosurgery" and "Guidelines." This was then compared against searches performed for each specialty of the American Board of Medical Specialties. The second analysis was an inventory of all neurosurgery guidelines published by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Guidelines clearinghouse. All Class I evidence and Level 1 recommendations were compared for different subspecialty topics.

RESULTS

When examined from 1970-2010, the rate of increase in publication of neurosurgery guidelines was about one third of all specialties combined (P < 0.0001). However, when only looking at the past 5 years the publication rate of neurosurgery guidelines has converged upon that for all specialties. The second analysis identified 49 published guidelines for assessment. There were 2733 studies cited as supporting evidence, with only 243 of these papers considered the highest class of evidence (8.9%). These papers were used to generate 697 recommendations, of which 170 (24.4%) were considered "Level 1" recommendations.

CONCLUSION

Although initially lagging, the publication of neurosurgical guidelines has recently increased at a rate comparable with that of other specialties. However, the quality of the evidence cited consists of a relatively low number of high-quality studies from which guidelines are created. Wider implications of this must be considered when defining and measuring quality of clinical performance in neurosurgery.

A Tunneled Subcricoid Approach for Anterior Cervical Spine Reoperation: Technical and Safety Results

OBJECTIVE

Anterior cervical spine decompression and fusion are common neurosurgical operations. Reoperation of the anterior cervical spine is associated with increased morbidity. The authors describe a novel subcricoid approach to protect the recurrent laryngeal nerve in a cuff of tissue while facilitating surgical access to the anterior cervical spine.

METHODS

Single institution, consecutive case review of 48 patients undergoing reoperation in the anterior cervical region including the level of C5 and below. Univariable and multivariable regression analysis was used to determine predictors of postoperative morbidity.

RESULTS

No intraoperative complications were reported. Estimated blood loss for the approach was 13.6 ± 3.1 mL. Nine of 48 patients developed immediate postoperative complications, including vocal cord paresis (10.4%), moderate-to-severe dysphagia (10.4%), and neck edema requiring intubation (2.1%). No postoperative hematomas or death occurred. All complications occurred with 4 or more levels of exposure (1-3 disc levels, 0%, vs. ≥ 4 disc levels, 31%). Extension of the exposure to the upper thoracic spine was associated with odds for postoperative complications (adjusted odds ratio, 6.50; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-37.03) and prolonged hospital stay (adjusted increase 4.23 days, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The tunneled subcricoid approach is a relatively safe corridor to reapproach the anterior cervical spine at the level of C5 and below. However, caution must be exercised when using this approach to expose 4 or more disc levels and with extension of the exposure to the upper thoracic spine. Future comparative studies are needed to establish patient selection criteria in determining the use of this technique compared with classic approaches.

Autologous clavicle bone graft for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with titanium interbody cage

A variety of donor-site complications have been reported for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using autologous iliac bone graft. To minimize such morbidities and to obtain optimal bony fusion at the ACDF surgery, a novel technique was used to harvest cancellous bone from the autologous clavicle instead of the popular iliac crest graft. After a routine cervical discectomy of the affected level, a 1.5-cm linear skin incision was made over the clavicle within 2.5 cm of the sternoclavicular joint on the medial one-third portion. This portion is known as an anatomically safe zone, with no subcutaneous distribution of the supraclavicular nerve. Then, cancellous bone was harvested through a small cortical window developed on the clavicle. Care was taken not to injure the subclavian major vessels and the lung below the clavicle. A box-type titanium cage was packed with the harvested cancellous bone and then inserted into the discectomy-treated space for cervical interbody fusion. From 2009 to 2013, 16 patients with cervical radiculopathy and/or myelopathy underwent single-level ACDF with this method. All but 1 patient experienced significant improvement of clinical symptoms after the surgery and showed radiographic evidence of solid bony fusion and spinal stabilization within 6 months. Further, no peri- and postoperative complications at the clavicular donor site were noted. The mean visual analog scale pain score (range 0 [no pain to 10 [maximum pain]) at 1 year after the surgery was 0.1, and 13 of 14 patients with data at 1-year follow-up were highly satisfied with their donor-site cosmetic outcome. The clavicle is a safe, reliable, and technically easy source of autologous bone graft that yields optimal fusion rates and patient satisfaction with ACDF surgery.

Zero-P: a new zero-profile cage-plate device for single and multilevel ACDF. A single institution series with four years maximum follow-up and review of the literature on zero-profile devices

PURPOSE

To analyze the prospectively collected data in a series of patients treated with single- or multilevel ACDF with a stand-alone, zero-profile device, focusing on clinico-radiological outcome, complications and technical hints, and to review the literature on such new devices.

METHODS

Eighty-five patients harboring symptomatic DDD underwent ACDF with the Zero-P cage-plate: 29 at 1-level and 56 at 2-4 levels (total 162 devices). In the multilevel group, 9 patients received a combination of Zero-P and stand-alone cages (hybrid implants). This study focuses on 32 patients with follow-up ranging from 20 to 48 months. NDI, SF-36 and arm pain VAS scores were registered preoperatively and at follow-up visits. Dysphagia was assessed using the Bazaz score. Imaging included X-rays, CT and MRI, also to assess the presence of vertebral body fractures in multilevel cases. Paired Student t test was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

SF-36 and NDI showed a statistically significant improvement (p < 0.01) and mean arm pain VAS score decreased from 79 to 41. X-rays and CT demonstrated, respectively, a 94.5 % and a 92 % fusion rate. Three patients complained of moderate and two of mild transient dysphagia (15.5 %). No device-related complications occurred and no fractures, secondary to four screws insertion in one vertebral body (i.e., swiss cheese effect), were detected in multilevel cases. In patients with extensive anterior osteophytes only a "focal spondylectomy" was required.

CONCLUSION

The Zero-P device is safe and efficient, even in multilevel cases. Dysphagia is minimal, extensive anterior osteophytectomy is unnecessary and technical hints may ease the surgical workflow. This is the largest series, with the longest follow-up, reported.

The CASCADE trial: effectiveness of ceramic versus PEEK cages for anterior cervical discectomy with interbody fusion; protocol of a blinded randomized controlled trial

Background

Anterior cervical discectomy with interbody fusion cages is considered the standard surgical procedure in patients with cervical disc herniation. However, PEEK or metal cages have some undesirable imaging characteristics, leading to a search for alternative materials not creating artifacts on images; silicon nitride ceramic. Whether patients treated with silicon nitride ceramic cages have similar functional outcome as patients treated with PEEK cages is not known. We present the design of the CASCADE trial on effectiveness of ceramic cages versus PEEK cages in patients with cervical disc herniation and/or osteophytes.

Methods/Design

Patients (age 18–75 years) with monoradicular symptoms in one or both arms lasting more than 8 weeks, due to disc herniation and/or osteophytes, are eligible for the trial. The study is designed as a randomized controlled equivalence trial in which patients are blinded to the type of cage for 1 year. The total follow-up period is 2 years. The primary outcome measure is improvement in the Neck and Disability Index (NDI). Secondary outcomes measures include improvement in arm pain and neck pain (VAS), SF-36 and patients' perceived recovery. The final elements of comparison are perioperative statistics including operating time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, and adverse events. Lateral plane films at each follow-up visit and CT scan (at 6 months) will be used to judge fusion and the incidence of subsidence. Based on a power of 90% and assuming 8% loss to follow-up, 100 patients will be randomized into the 2 groups. The first analysis will be conducted when all patients have 1 year of follow-up, and the groups will be followed for 1 additional year to judge stability of outcomes.

Discussion

While the new ceramic cage has received the CE Mark based on standard compliance and animal studies, a randomized comparative study with the golden standard product will provide more conclusive information for clinicians. Implementation of any new device should only be done after completion of randomized controlled effectiveness trials.

Porous/dense composite hydroxyapatite for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective analysis

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to investigate the efficacy of new synthetic porous/dense composite hydroxyapatite (HA) for use in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Iliac crest bone graft (ICBG) has been traditionally used as the "gold standard" for ACDF. The significant complication rate associated with harvesting tricortical ICBG, however, has encouraged development of alternative graft substitutes.

METHODS

The morphology of the porous/dense HA was observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and the in vitro compressive strength of the composite HA was measured. From April 2005, 51 consecutive patients underwent 81 levels of ACDF using the composite HA with percutaneously harvested trephine bone chips. Clinical and radiological evaluation was performed during the postoperative hospital stay and at follow-up. Furthermore, the outcomes in ACDF using the composite HA were compared with those using tricortical ICBG.

RESULTS

The SEM images demonstrated 100- to 300-μm pores (approximately 40% of porosity) in the porous layers of the HA. The compressive strength of the composite HA was 203.1 ± 4.1 MPa. In the clinical study, the demographic data of the patients were similar in HA and ICBG groups. The fusion rates in HA group were comparable with those in ICBG group. The cervical lordosis was enhanced postoperatively in both groups and well preserved at 2-year follow-up without significant differences between the groups. The intraoperative blood loss in HA group was significantly lesser than that in ICBG group. Donor site complications were found in 29.2% of the patients in ICBG group, whereas no donor site morbidity was found in HA group. No major collapse or fragmentation of the composite HA was found.

CONCLUSION

The hybrid graft of composite HA and percutaneously harvested trephine chips seemed promising as a graft substitute for ACDF.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Clinical and radiological comparison of femur and fibular allografts for the treatment of cervical degenerative disc diseases

Objective

This consecutive retrospective study was designed to analyze and to compare the efficacy and outcomes of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using a fibular and femur allograft with anterior cervical plating.

Methods

A total of 88 consecutive patients suffering from cervical degenerative disc disease (DDD) who were treated with ACDF from September 2007 to August 2010 were enrolled in this study. Thirty-seven patients (58 segments) underwent anterior interbody fusion with a femur allograft, and 51 patients (64 segments) were treated with a fibular allograft. The mean follow-up period was 16.0 (range, 12-25) months in the femur group and 19.5 (range, 14-39) months in the fibular group. Cage fracture and breakage, subsidence rate, fusion rate, segmental angle and height and disc height were assessed by using radiography. Clinical outcomes were assessed using a visual analog scale and neck disability index.

Results

At 12 months postoperatively, cage fracture and breakage had occurred in 3.4% (2/58) and 7.4% (4/58) of the patients in the femur group, respectively, and 21.9% (14/64) and 31.3% (20/64) of the patients in the fibular group, respectively (p<0.05). Subsidence was noted in 43.1% (25/58) of the femur group and in 50.5% (32/64) of the fibular group. No difference in improvements in the clinical outcome between the two groups was observed.

Conclusion

The femur allograft showed good results in subsidence and radiologic parameters, and sustained the original cage shape more effectively than the fibular allograft. The present study suggests that the femur allograft may be a good choice as a fusion substitute for the treatment of cervical DDD.

A comparison of mesenchymal precursor cells and amnion epithelial cells for enhancing cervical interbody fusion in an ovine model

BACKGROUND

Rapid, reliable fusion is the goal in anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion. Iliac crest autograft has a high rate of donor-site morbidity. Alternatives such as bone graft substitutes lack osteoinductivity, and recombinant bone morphogenetic proteins risk life-threatening complications. Both allogeneic mesenchymal precursor cells (MPCs) and amnion derived epithelial cells (AECs) have osteogenic potential.

OBJECTIVE

To compare for the first time the capacity of MPCs and AECs to promote osteogenesis in an ovine model.

METHODS

Five groups of 2-year-old ewes were subjected to C3-4 anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion with a Fidji interbody cage packed with iliac crest autograft alone (group A; n = 6), hydroxyapatite-tricalcium phosphate Mastergraft granules (HA/TCP) alone (group B; n = 6), HA/TCP containing 5 million MPCs (group C; n = 6), or HA/TCP containing 5 million AECs (group D; n = 5); group E was made up of age-matched nonoperative controls (n = 6). At 3 months, animals were euthanized and quantitative multislice computed tomography, functional radiography, biomechanics, histology, and histomorphometry were performed.

RESULTS

No procedure- or cell-related adverse events were observed. There was significantly more fusion in the MPC group (C) than in group A, B, or D. Computed tomography scan at 3 months revealed that 5 of 6 MPC-treated animals (83%) had continuous bony bridging compared with 0 of 5 AEC-treated and only 1 of 6 autograft- and 2 of 6 HA/TCP-treated animals (P = .01).

CONCLUSION

Implantation of allogeneic MPCs in combination with HA/TCP within an interbody spacer facilitates interbody fusion after diskectomy. The earlier, more robust fusion observed with MPCs relative to autograft and HA/TCP bone substitute indicates that this approach may offer a therapeutic benefit.

In Vivo and In Vitro Study of a Polylactide-Fiber-Reinforced β-Tricalcium Phosphate Composite Cage in an Ovine Anterior Cervical Intercorporal Fusion Model

A poly-70L/30DL-lactide (PLA70)–β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) composite implant reinforced by continuous PLA-96L/4D-lactide (PLA96) fibers was designed for in vivo spinal fusion. The pilot study was performed with four sheep, using titanium cage implants as controls. The composite implants failed to direct bone growth as desired, whereas the bone contact and the proper integration were evident with controls 6 months after implantation. Therefore, the PLA70/β-TCP composite matrix material was further analyzed in the in vitro experiment by human and ovine adipose stem cells (hASCs and oASCs). The composites proved to be biocompatible as confirmed by live/dead assay. The proliferation rate of oASCs was higher than that of hASCs at all times during the 28 d culture period. Furthermore, the composites had only a minor osteogenic effect on oASCs, whereas the hASC osteogenesis on PLA70/β-TCP composites was evident. In conclusion, the composite implant material can be applied with hASCs for tissue engineering but not be evaluated in vivo with sheep.

Operative outcomes for cervical myelopathy and radiculopathy

Cervical spondylotic myelopathy and radiculopathy are common disorders which can lead to significant clinical morbidity. Conservative management, such as physical therapy, cervical immobilisation, or anti-inflammatory medications, is the preferred and often only required intervention. Surgical intervention is reserved for those patients who have intractable pain or progressive neurological symptoms. The goals of surgical treatment are decompression of the spinal cord and nerve roots and deformity prevention by maintaining or supplementing spinal stability and alleviating pain. Numerous surgical techniques exist to alleviate symptoms, which are achieved through anterior, posterior, or circumferential approaches. Under most circumstances, one approach will produce optimal results. It is important that the surgical plan is tailored to address each individual's unique clinical circumstance. The objective of this paper is to analyse the major surgical treatment options for cervical myelopathy and radiculopathy focusing on outcomes and complications.

Surgical management of cervical degenerative disease: the evidence related to indications, impact, and outcome

In this special edition of Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, a series of systematic reviews sponsored by the Section on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons/Congress of Neurological Surgeons is presented. This collection of comprehensive reviews summarizes the medical evidence related to the surgical management of cervical degenerative disc disease. Several of the key conclusions are discussed in this introduction to the issue:

Finally, in patients with symptomatic cervical radiculopathy, arthroplasty achieves outcomes that are equivalent to anterior cervical decompression and fusion, although evidence for superiority is lacking.

Further prospective longitudinal data are required to better define the role and timing of surgical intervention in CSM and to determine the appropriate use of cervical arthroplasty in the management of symptomatic cervical degenerative disc disease.