Quality of life after hemicraniectomy for traumatic brain injury in adults

Health-related quality of life measures in patients undergoing decompressive craniectomy for severe traumatic brain injury: a 6-year follow-up analysis

PURPOSE

We aimed to assess the long-term neurological outcomes and the functionality and QoL in patients undergoing decompressive craniectomy for severe traumatic brain injury, respectively.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Among the 120 patients who underwent decompressive craniectomy for severe TBI between 2002 and 2007, 101 were included based on the inclusion criteria. Long-term follow-up results (minimum 3 years) were available for 22 patients. The outcomes were assessed using the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) and the functionality and HRQoL were assessed using the Short Form-36 (SF-36) (v2) and Quality of Life After Brain Injury (QoLIBRI) questionnaires.

RESULTS

Among the patients with severe TBI, 62 (61.4%) died and 39 (38.6%) were discharged to either home or a physical therapy facility. Eleven of the thirty-nine patients could not be reached and were excluded from the final analysis. The mean GOS of the remaining 28 patients was 4.14 ± 0.8 after 6.46 ± 1.64 years of follow-up. The HRQoL was assessed in 22 of the 28 patients. The HRQoL scores were lower in patients with TBI than in healthy controls. Furthermore, there was a significant difference in the HRQoL scores in patients with improved GOS scores than in those with unimproved GOS scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Health-related outcome scores could help clinicians understand the requirements of survivors of severe TBI to create a realistic rehabilitation target for them. QoLIBRI served as a good way of communication in these subjects.

Long-term quality of life after decompressive craniectomy

Introduction

This study aims to assess the quality of life (QoL) in patients who have undergone decompressive craniectomy (DC) for any pathology that has caused life-threatening intracranial hypertension. Similarly, it aims to evaluate QoL perceived by caregivers or external informants. In addition to that, the last purpose is to determine which clinical or therapeutic factors could correlate with a better QoL.

Methods

A single-center cross-sectional study was designed. All patients over 18 years old who underwent a supratentorial DC at our department due to intracranial hypertension of any etiology, from January 2015 to December 2021, were retrospectively selected. Patients with incomplete follow-up (under 1 year from the event or those who died) or who declined to participate in the study were excluded. QoL was assessed with SF-36 and CAVIDACE scales. The correlation between clinical and therapeutic variables and SF-36 subscales was studied with Spearman's correlation and the Mann-Whitney U-test.

Results

A total of 55 consecutive patients were recruited: 22 patients had died, three were missed for follow-up, and 15 declined to participate, thus 15 subjects were finally included. The mean follow-up was 47 months (IQR 21.5-67.5). A significant reduction in the "role physical" and "role emotional" subscales of SF-36 was observed compared with the general population. According to caregivers, a significant reduction was assigned to the "physical wellbeing" and "rights" domains. The "physical functioning" score was poorer in women, older patients, those with dominant hemisphere disease, those who required tracheostomy, and those with poor outcomes in the modified Rankin scale. A strong correlation was found between the QoL index at the CAVIDACE scale and the SF-36 subscales "physical functioning" and "role physical".

Conclusion

Most patients and caregivers reported acceptable QoL after DC due to a life-threatening disease. A significant reduction in SF- 36 subscales scores "role limitation due to physical problems" and "role limitation due to emotional problems" was referred by patients. According to caregivers' QoL perception, only 25% of the survey's participants showed low scores in the QoL index of the CAVIDACE scale. Only 26.7% of the patients showed mood disorders.

Development and Characterization of a Probe Device toward Intracranial Spectroscopy of Traumatic Brain Injury

Traumatic brain injury is a leading cause of mortality worldwide, often affecting individuals at their most economically active yet no primary disease-modifying interventions exist for their treatment. Real-time direct spectroscopic examination of the brain tissue within the context of traumatic brain injury has the potential to improve the understanding of injury heterogeneity and subtypes, better target management strategies and organ penetrance of pharmacological agents, identify novel targets for intervention, and allow a clearer understanding of fundamental biochemistry evolution. Here, a novel device is designed and engineered, delivering Raman spectroscopy-based measurements from the brain through clinically established cranial access techniques. Device prototyping is undertaken within the constraints imposed by the acquisition and site dimensions (standard intracranial access holes, probe’s dimensions), and an artificial skull anatomical model with cortical impact is developed. The device shows a good agreement with the data acquired via a standard commercial Raman, and the spectra measured are comparable in terms of quality and detectable bands to the established traumatic brain injury model. The developed proof-of-concept device demonstrates the feasibility for real-time optical brain spectroscopic interface while removing the noise of extracranial tissue and with further optimization and in vivo validation, such technology will be directly translatable for integration into currently available standards of neurological care.

Consensus statement from the International Consensus Meeting on the Role of Decompressive Craniectomy in the Management of Traumatic Brain Injury : Consensus statement

BACKGROUND

Two randomised trials assessing the effectiveness of decompressive craniectomy (DC) following traumatic brain injury (TBI) were published in recent years: DECRA in 2011 and RESCUEicp in 2016. As the results have generated debate amongst clinicians and researchers working in the field of TBI worldwide, it was felt necessary to provide general guidance on the use of DC following TBI and identify areas of ongoing uncertainty via a consensus-based approach.

METHODS

The International Consensus Meeting on the Role of Decompressive Craniectomy in the Management of Traumatic Brain Injury took place in Cambridge, UK, on the 28th and 29th September 2017. The meeting was jointly organised by the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS), AO/Global Neuro and the NIHR Global Health Research Group on Neurotrauma. Discussions and voting were organised around six pre-specified themes: (1) primary DC for mass lesions, (2) secondary DC for intracranial hypertension, (3) peri-operative care, (4) surgical technique, (5) cranial reconstruction and (6) DC in low- and middle-income countries.

RESULTS

The invited participants discussed existing published evidence and proposed consensus statements. Statements required an agreement threshold of more than 70% by blinded voting for approval.

CONCLUSIONS

In this manuscript, we present the final consensus-based recommendations. We have also identified areas of uncertainty, where further research is required, including the role of primary DC, the role of hinge craniotomy and the optimal timing and material for skull reconstruction.

Pathophysiology and Management of Intracranial Hypertension and Tissular Brain Hypoxia After Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: An Integrative Approach

Monitoring intracranial pressure in comatose patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) is considered necessary by most experts. Acute intracranial hypertension (IHT), when severe and sustained, is a life-threatening complication that demands emergency treatment. Yet, secondary anoxic-ischemic injury after brain trauma can occur in the absence of IHT. In such cases, adding other monitoring modalities can alert clinicians when the patient is in a state of energy failure. This article reviews the mechanisms, diagnosis, and treatment of IHT and brain hypoxia after TBI, emphasizing the need to develop a physiologically integrative approach to the management of these complex situations.

Analysis of direct costs of decompressive craniectomy in victims of traumatic brain injury

ABSTRACT Background: Decompressive craniectomy is a procedure required in some cases of traumatic brain injury (TBI). This manuscript evaluates the direct costs and outcomes of decompressive craniectomy for TBI in a developing country and describes the epidemiological profile. Methods: A retrospective study was performed using a five-year neurosurgical database, taking a sample of patients with TBI who underwent decompressive craniectomy. Several variables were considered and a formula was developed for calculating the total cost. Results: Most patients had multiple brain lesions and the majority (69.0%) developed an infectious complication. The general mortality index was 68.8%. The total cost was R$ 2,116,960.22 (US$ 661,550.06) and the mean patient cost was R$ 66,155.00 (US$ 20,673.44). Conclusions: Decompressive craniectomy for TBI is an expensive procedure that is also associated with high morbidity and mortality. This was the first study performed in a developing country that aimed to evaluate the direct costs. Prevention measures should be a priority.

The floating anchored craniotomy

BACKGROUND

The "floating anchored" craniotomy is a technique utilized at our tertiary neurosurgery institution in which a traditional decompressive craniectomy has been substituted for a floating craniotomy. The hypothesized advantages of this technique include adequate decompression, reduction in the intracranial pressure, obviating the need for a secondary cranioplasty, maintained bone protection, preventing the syndrome of the trephined, and a potential reduction in axonal stretching.

METHODS

The bone plate is re-attached via multiple loosely affixed vicryl sutures, enabling decompression, but then ensuring the bone returns to its anatomical position once cerebral edema has subsided.

RESULTS

From the analysis of 57 consecutive patients analyzed at our institution, we have found that the floating anchored craniotomy is comparable to decompressive craniectomy for intracranial pressure reduction and has some significant theoretical advantages.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the potential advantages of techniques that avoid the need for a second cranioplasty, they have not been widely adopted and have been omitted from trials examining the utility of decompressive surgery. This retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data suggests that the floating anchored craniotomy may be applicable instead of decompressive craniectomy.

Decompression surgery for severe traumatic brain injury (TBI): A long-term, single-centre experience

INTRODUCTION

Despite well-conducted medical treatment, refractory intracranial hypertension occurs in 10-15% of patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). Surgical decompression procedures, such as hemicraniectomy, are mainly considered as a rescue therapy. However, the long-term neurological outcomes of these patients remain controversial. Thus, the purpose of this study was to investigate the long-term evolution of patients requiring surgical decompression surgery in our ICU over the last 7 years.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective single-centre study over the last 7 years. Severe traumatic brain injury patients presenting a refractory intracranial hypertension (ICP) and who underwent decompression surgery were included. Demographic data, in-hospital complications (infectious diseases, seizures) and in-hospital mortality were studied. Patients were further (from 1 to 8 years post injury) contacted for questioning including evaluation of the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS), recovery of professional activity, concentration disorders, motor and mood disabilities, sleep disorders, headaches, or seizure occurrences. We compared this population with patients presenting elevated ICP not needing surgery, and matched on gender, age, SAPS II scores, initial GCS, and time since TBI.

RESULTS

Twenty patients required decompression surgery during the studied period (2%), half of whom deceased during that time. Among surviving patients, 22% had seizures. Memory disorders represented the most frequently reported disability (100% of questioned patients). Half of the patients presented sleep disorders and headaches after hospitalization. Only 33% of these patients recovered a professional activity after treatment. Compared to the matched population, long-term neurological status was equivalent in survivors.

CONCLUSION

In this small retrospective study, we found that decompression surgery performed for traumatic refractory raised ICP concerned only 2% of our traumatic brain injury patients. According to long-term evaluation, decompression surgery is associated with unfavourable outcomes and disabilities. However, the functional recovery and quality of life in survivors seems equivalent to a matched population. These results require confirmation via larger studies.

Decompressive craniectomy for management of traumatic brain injury: an update

Decompressive craniectomy (DC) for the management of severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) has a long history but remains controversial. Although DC has been shown to improve both survival and functional outcome in patients with malignant cerebral infarctions, evidence of benefit in patients with TBI is decidedly more mixed. Craniectomy can clearly be life-saving in the presence of medically intractable elevations of intracranial pressure. Craniectomy also has been consistently demonstrated to reduce "therapeutic intensity" in the ICU, to reduce the need for intracranial-pressure-directed and brain-oxygen-directed interventions, and to reduce ICU length of stay. Still, the only randomized trial of DC in TBI failed to demonstrate any benefit. Studies of therapies for TBI, including hemicraniectomy, are challenging owing to the inherent heterogeneity in the pathophysiology observed in this disease. Craniectomy can be life-saving for patients with severe TBI, but many questions remain regarding its ideal application, and the outcome remains highly correlated with the severity of the initial injury.

Contralateral acute subdural hematoma following traumatic acute subdural hematoma evacuation

Contralateral acute subdural hematoma (ASDH) occurring after removal of traumatic ASDH is a rare, but nearly devastating postoperative complication. We treated a 26-year-old male who developed a contralateral ASDH shortly after craniectomy for evacuation of a traumatic ASDH. Burr-hole craniotomy was performed before decompressive craniectomy, and the bleeding source was a cortex artery within the frontal lobe contusion. Despite supportive therapy with barbiturate and mild hypothermia he expired 3 days later of brain death. Literature review suggests that the old are more susceptible to contralateral ASDH following evacuation of traumatic ASDH. Contralateral ASDH following evacuation of traumatic ASDH is a rare but potentially lethal complication, so neurosurgeons should try to detect such contralateral hematoma formation and prevent clinical deterioration.

Management of increased intracranial pressure

OPINION STATEMENT

After brain injury, neurologic intensive care focuses on the detection and treatment of secondary brain insults that may compound the initial injury. Increased intracranial pressure (ICP) contributes to secondary brain injury by causing brain ischemia, hypoxia, and metabolic dysfunction. Because ICP is easily measured at the bedside, it is the target of numerous pharmacologic and surgical interventions in efforts to improve brain physiology and limit secondary injury. However, ICP may not adequately reflect the metabolic health of the underlying brain tissue, particularly in cases of focal brain injury. As a result, ICP control alone may be insufficient to impact patients' long-term recovery. Further studies are needed to better understand the combination of cerebral, hemodynamic, and metabolic markers that are best utilized to ensure optimal brain and systemic recovery and overall patient outcome after brain injury.

Hydrocephalus following decompressive craniectomy for ischemic stroke

Numerous studies on hydrocephalus after decompressive craniectomy (DC) for severe traumatic brain injury have been reported, whereas there have been only two reports on DC for hemispheric cerebral infarction. Here, we present the clinical details of 23 patients who underwent DC for hemispheric cerebral infarction and the incidence of hydrocephalus following DC. Of the 23 patients, 13 were male and 10 were female, with an age range from 34 to 75 years (mean, 60.8 years). The areas of hemispheric infarctions were those of the middle cerebral arteries in 12 patients and of the internal carotid arteries in 11 patients. The mean preoperative GCS score was 6. Nineteen patients (82.6 %) underwent cranioplasty. Pre-cranioplasty hydrocephalus was observed in 11 (47.8 %) patients. Four patients who had precranioplasty hydrocephalus were transferred or died without cranioplasty, and post-cranioplasty hydrocephalus occurred in 7 (36.8 %). Only one patient underwent a shunt procedure after cranioplasty. We consider that the explanation for the discrepancies between our study and the previous studies might lie in the definition of hydrocephalus and the indications for shunting.

Surgery for contralateral acute epidural hematoma following acute subdural hematoma evacuation: five new cases and a short literature review

BACKGROUND

The occurrence of a contralateral acute epidural hematoma (AEDH) following removal of an acute subdural hematoma (ASDH) is a rare but nearly devastating postoperative complication. Here, we describe a series of five patients with contralateral AEDH and provide a review of the literature to elucidate the characteristics and improve management of these patients.

METHODS

A total of 386 patients underwent ASDH evacuations in our hospital between August 2008 and July 2011. Five of these patients (1.3 %) developed AEDH that required surgery. Thirty-two additional patients were identified by a search of the PubMed database. Clinical features, surgical treatment, and outcomes (scored by Glasgow outcome scale, GOS) of the collective 37 AEDH cases were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Contralateral AEDH after ASDH evacuation occurred in 27 males (73 %) and 10 females (27 %) (mean age: 35.9 ± 14.2 years). Twenty-six patients (70 %) had unfavorable outcomes (GOS 1-3), and 11 patients (30 %) had favorable outcomes (GOS 4-5). Contralateral skull fractures and intraoperative acute brain swelling occurred in 30 (81 %) and 28 (76 %) patients, respectively. The preoperative Glasgow coma score (GCS) was significantly associated with outcome (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Lower preoperative GCS score is an independent risk factor for prognosis of contralateral AEDH after ASDH. Postoperative management should include assessment of AEDH in patients treated for contralateral skull fractures and who experienced intraoperative acute brain swelling. We recommend early decompression with a burr-hole craniotomy, immediately followed by a decompressive craniectomy. This strategy provides gradual decompression, while advancing the initial surgical time and preventing the suddle decreased tamponade effect. As such, it may help decrease the risk of contralateral AEDH associated with decompression.

Decompressive craniectomy – friend or foe?

Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is the surgical management removing part of the skull vault over a swollen brain used to treat elevated intracranial pressure that is unresponsive to maximal medical therapy. The commonest indication for DC is traumatic brain injury (TBI) or middle cerebral artery (MCA) infarction, though DC has been reported to have been used for treatment of aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage and venous infarction. Despite an increasing number of reports supportive of DC, the controversy over the suitability of the procedure and criteria for patient selection remains unresolved. Although the majority of published studies are retrospective, the recent publication of several randomised prospective studies prompts a re-evaluation of the use of DC. We review the literature concerning the pathophysiology, indication, surgical techniques and timing, complications and long-term effects of DC (including reversal with cranioplasty), in order to rationalise its use. We conclude that at the time of this review, though we cannot support the routine use of DC in TBI or MCA stroke, there is evidence that early and aggressive use of DC in TBI patients with intracranial haematomas or younger malignant MCA stroke patients may improve outcome. Though the results of the DECRA trial suggest that primary DC may worsen outcome, the decision to perform DC after diffuse TBI is still individualised. We await the results of the RESCUEicp trial to ascertain whether an evidence-based protocol for its use can be agreed in the future.

Analysis of complications following decompressive craniectomy for traumatic brain injury

OBJECTIVE

Adequate management of increased intracranial pressure (ICP) is critical in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI), and decompressive craniectomy is widely used to treat refractory increased ICP. The authors reviewed and analyzed complications following decompressive craniectomy for the management of TBI.

METHODS

A total of 89 consecutive patients who underwent decompressive craniectomy for TBI between February 2004 and February 2009 were reviewed retrospectively. Incidence rates of complications secondary to decompressive craniectomy were determined, and analyses were performed to identify clinical factors associated with the development of complications and the poor outcome.

RESULTS

Complications secondary to decompressive craniectomy occurred in 48 of the 89 (53.9%) patients. Furthermore, these complications occurred in a sequential fashion at specific times after surgical intervention; cerebral contusion expansion (2.2 ± 1.2 days), newly appearing subdural or epidural hematoma contralateral to the craniectomy defect (1.5 ± 0.9 days), epilepsy (2.7 ± 1.5 days), cerebrospinal fluid leakage through the scalp incision (7.0 ± 4.2 days), and external cerebral herniation (5.5 ± 3.3 days). Subdural effusion (10.8 ± 5.2 days) and postoperative infection (9.8 ± 3.1 days) developed between one and four weeks postoperatively. Trephined and post-traumatic hydrocephalus syndromes developed after one month postoperatively (at 79.5 ± 23.6 and 49.2 ± 14.1 days, respectively).

CONCLUSION

A poor GCS score (≤ 8) and an age of ≥ 65 were found to be related to the occurrence of one of the above-mentioned complications. These results should help neurosurgeons anticipate these complications, to adopt management strategies that reduce the risks of complications, and to improve clinical outcomes.

Contemporary pharmacologic issues in the management of traumatic brain injury

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major cause of death and disability in the United States. While there are no pharmacotherapeutic options currently available for attenuating the neurologic injury cascade after TBI, numerous pharmacologic issues are encountered in these critically ill patients. Adequate fluid resuscitation, reversal of coagulopathy, maintenance of cerebral perfusion, and treatment of intracranial hypertension are common interventions early in the treatment of TBI. Other deleterious complications such as venous thromboembolism, extremes in glucose concentrations, and stress-related mucosal disease should be anticipated and avoided. Early provision of nutrition and prevention of drug or alcohol withdrawal are also cornerstones of routine care in TBI patients. Prevention of infections and seizures may also be helpful. Clinicians caring for TBI patients should be familiar with the pharmacologic issues typical of this vulnerable population in order to develop optimal strategies of care to anticipate and prevent common complications.