Introduction

Predictive value of IOM in clipping of unruptured intracranial aneurysms - A prospective study from the surgeon's point of view

Introduction

Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IOM) of motor/somatosensory evoked potentials is a well-established approach for reducing ischemic complications after aneurysm clipping.

Research question

To determine the predictive validity of IOM for postoperative functional outcome and its perceived added value for intraoperative real-time feedback of functional impairment in the surgical treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs).

Material and methods

Prospective study of patients scheduled for elective clipping of UIAs between 02/2019-02/2021. Transcranial motor evoked potentials (tcMEP) were used in all cases, a significant decline was defined as loss of ≥50% in amplitude or 50% latency increase. Clinical data were correlated to postoperative deficits. A surgeon's questionnaire was conceived.

Results

47 patients were included, median age 57 years (range 26-76). IOM was successful in all cases. In 87.2%, IOM was stable throughout surgery, although 1 patient (2.4%) demonstrated a permanent postoperative neurological deficit. All patients with an intraoperatively reversible tcMEP-decline (12.7%) showed no surgery-related deficit, regardless of the decline duration (range 0.5-40.0 ​min; mean: 13.8). Temporary clipping (TC) was performed in 12 cases (25.5%), with a decline in amplitude in 4 patients. After clip-removal, all amplitudes returned to baseline. IOM provided the surgeon with a higher sense of security in 63.8%.

Discussion and conclusion

IOM remains invaluable during elective microsurgical clipping, particularly during TC of MCA and AcomA-aneurysms. It alerts the surgeon of impending ischemic injury and offers a way of maximizing the time frame for TC. IOM has highly increased surgeons' subjective feeling of security during the procedure.

Interhemispheric Transcingulate Sulcus Approach to Deep-Seated Medial Frontal and Parietal Lesions-Fiber Dissection Study With Illustrative Cases

BACKGROUND

Surgery for lesions located in the medial frontal and parietal lobes can be quite challenging for neurosurgeons because of morbidities that may arise from damage to critical midline structures or intact neural tissue that need to be crossed to reach the lesion. In our anatomic studies, the cingulate sulcus was observed as an alternative access route for lesions located in medial frontal and parietal lobes.

OBJECTIVE

To explain the microsurgical anatomy of the medial hemisphere and cingulate sulcus and to demonstrate the interhemispheric transcingulate sulcus approach (ITCSA) with 3 clinical cases.

METHODS

Five formalin-fixed brain specimens, which were frozen at -18 °C for at least 2 weeks and then thawed under tap water, were gradually dissected from medial to lateral. Diffusion fiber tracking performed using DSI Studio software in data was provided by the Human Connectome Project. Clinical data of 3 patients who underwent ITCSA were reviewed.

RESULTS

Cingulate sulcus is an effortlessly identifiable continuous sulcus on the medial surface of the brain. Our anatomic dissection study revealed that the lesions located in the deep medial frontal and parietal lobes can be reached through the cingulate sulcus with minor injury only to the cingulum and callosal fibers. Three patients were treated with ITCSA without any neurological morbidity.

CONCLUSION

Deep-seated lesions in the medial frontal lobe and parietal lobe medial to the corona radiata can be approached by using microsurgical techniques based on anatomic information. ITCSA offers an alternative route to these lesions besides the known lateral transcortical/transsulcal and interhemispheric transcingulate gyrus approaches.

How Integrated Anesthesia Communication Leads to Dependable IONM Data

Many algorithms, checklists, and escalation pathways have been created to encourage perioperative teams to share a mental model and approach patient care as a team. Respecting and empowering the many voices involved in patient care is crucial to avoid errors and improve patient safety. None of the concepts described herein are novel; however, sustained improvements in operating room culture remain elusive in many organizations. The implementation of practices directed toward driving change in operating room culture has led to improvements in Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) recordables, perioperative communication, and patient care practices. In this paper, we will review the importance of culture, mutual accountability, and communication in improving patient care, and share several of the processes that have been created at our pediatric tertiary care center.

Multimodality intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during Onyx embolization of cerebrovascular malformations

General anesthesia prohibits neurological examination during embolization of cerebrovascular malformations when provocative testing prior to pedicle occlusion is needed. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) has the potential to fill this gap but remains relatively unexplored. We conduct a retrospective review of consecutive patients with cerebrovascular malformations treated with Onyx (ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer, dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide) embolization under general anesthesia with IONM from 2009 to 2012. Somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs), transcranial motor evoked potentials (TcMEPs), visual evoked potential (VEPs), auditory brainstem response (ABR), and electroencephalography (EEG) were used selectively in all patients depending on the location of the malformation. Provocative testing combined with IONM was performed in 28 patients over 75 sessions. Three patients demonstrated changes in TcMEPs or ABR during provocative testing, which halted the planned embolization. Two patients demonstrated changes in baseline SSEPs after embolization, despite normal IONM during provocative testing, correlating with postprocedural contralateral weakness. Six patients developed visual deficits after arterial occlusion despite unchanged VEPs and occipital EEG during provocative testing and embolization. We therefore conclude that the sensitivity of TcMEPs and SSEPs is preferable to EEG, and we strongly caution against relying on occipital recorded VEPs to predict visual deficits.

Neuromonitoring with pulse-train stimulation for implantation of thoracic pedicle screws: a blinded and randomized clinical study. Part 2. The role of feedback

Object

The authors have reported in Part 1 of this study on a novel neuromonitoring test for the prevention of medial malpositioning of thoracic pedicle screws. In the present paper they examine the impact of providing the results of the test as intraoperative feedback to the surgical team.

Methods

This is the second part of a 2-part report of a prospective, blinded and randomized neuromonitoring study designed to lower the incidence of medially malpositioned thoracic pedicle screws. Details of the neuromonitoring technique and data supporting the alarm criteria used are contained in the companion article (Part 1). For the majority of pedicle screw placements, intraoperative test results were withheld from the study team (that is, the team members were blinded to the test results). However, for a limited number of pedicle sites the authors provided one of 2 forms of testing feedback to the surgical team: 1) “break the blind” feedback, if testing suggested that screw placement would result in direct contact between screw and the dura mater; and 2) “planned” feedback, beginning during the later stages of the study and provided for 50% of pedicle sites. Feedback gave the surgeon the opportunity to adjust the trajectory that the screw would ultimately take within the pedicle. The final screw position relative to the pedicle's medial wall for all sites in which feedback was withheld from the surgical team was compared with the screw position for those sites in which either form of feedback (“break the blind” or “planned”) was provided to and acted upon by the surgical team.

Results

Of the 820 pedicle tracks tested among the 71 surgical cases included in this study, a total of 684 were operated upon without any form of feedback. Planned feedback was provided for an additional 107 pedicle tracks, of which 15 triggered an intraoperative alarm (evoked electromyogram response in leg muscles to stimulus intensity ≤ 10 mA) leading to a warning to the surgical team of a medially biased pedicle track. Finally, the blind was broken 29 times, in each case when testing revealed a particularly low threshold (≤ 4 mA) for evoked responses in leg muscles when stimulating along the pedicle track with the ball-tipped probe. As detailed in the companion paper to this one, there were 32 screws with threads lying at least 2 mm medial to the pedicle wall. In all 32 instances (100%), either these screws were in the “no feedback” category (n = 29) or they were in a feedback category but the surgeon elected to not revise the pedicle-track trajectory. Two patients returned to the operating room for revision of screw placements because the screws were encroaching upon the central canal; the pedicle tracks for these screws had been in the “no feedback” category.

Conclusions

This is the first blinded and randomized study to prove that implementing a novel neuromonitoring strategy during placement of thoracic pedicle screws can significantly reduce the incidence of clinically relevant thoracic pedicle screw medial malpositioning.

Cervical decompression and reconstruction without intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring

Object

The primary goal of this study was to review the immediate postoperative neurological function in patients surgically treated for symptomatic cervical spine disease without intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring. The secondary goal was to assess the economic impact of intraoperative monitoring (IOM) in this patient population.

Methods

This study is a retrospective review of 720 consecutively treated patients who underwent cervical spine procedures. The patients were identified and the data were collected by individuals who were not involved in their care.

Results

A total of 1534 cervical spine levels were treated in 720 patients using anterior, posterior, and combined (360°) approaches. Myelopathy was present preoperatively in 308 patients. There were 185 patients with increased signal intensity within the spinal cord on preoperative T2-weighted MR images, of whom 43 patients had no clinical evidence of myelopathy. Three patients (0.4%) exhibited a new neurological deficit postoperatively. Of these patients, 1 had a preoperative diagnosis of radiculopathy, while the other 2 were treated for myelopathy. The new postoperative deficits completely resolved in all 3 patients and did not require additional treatment. The Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes for IOM during cervical decompression include 95925 and 95926 for somatosensory evoked potential monitoring of the upper and lower extremities, respectively, as well as 95928 and 95929 for motor evoked potential monitoring of the upper and lower extremities. In addition to the charge for the baseline [monitoring] study, patients are charged hourly for ongoing electrophysiology testing and monitoring using the CPT code 95920. Based on these codes and assuming an average of 4 hours of monitoring time per surgical case, the savings realized in this group of patients was estimated to be $1,024,754.

Conclusions

With the continuing increase in health care costs, it is our responsibility as providers to minimize expenses when possible. This should be accomplished without compromising the quality of care to patients. This study demonstrates that decompression and reconstruction for symptomatic cervical spine disease without IOM may reduce the cost of treatment without adversely impacting patient safety.

A role for motor and somatosensory evoked potentials during anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for patients without myelopathy: Analysis of 57 consecutive cases

BACKGROUND

Although the usage of combined motor and sensory intraoperative monitoring has been shown to improve the surgical outcome of patients with cervical myelopathy, the role of transcranial electric motor evoked potentials (tceMEP) used in conjunction with somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) in patients presenting with radiculopathy but without myelopathy has been less clear.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all patients (n = 57) with radiculopathy but without myelopathy, undergoing anterior cervical decompression and fusion at a single institution over the past 3 years, who had intraoperative monitoring with both tceMEPs and SSEPs.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven (100%) patients presented with radiculopathy, 53 (93.0%) with mechanical neck pain, 35 (61.4%) with motor dysfunction, and 29 (50.9%) with sensory deficits. Intraoperatively, 3 (5.3%) patients experienced decreases in SSEP signal amplitudes and 4 (6.9%) had tceMEP signal changes. There were three instances where a change in neuromonitoring signal required intraoperative alteration of the surgical procedure: these were deemed clinically significant events/true positives. SSEP monitoring showed two false positives and two false negatives, whereas tceMEP monitoring only had one false positive and no false negatives. Thus, tceMEP monitoring exhibited higher sensitivity (33.3% vs. 100%), specificity (95.6% vs. 98.1%), positive predictive value (33.3% vs. 75.0%), negative predictive value (97.7% vs. 100%), and efficiency (91.7% vs. 98.2%) compared to SSEP monitoring alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Here, we present a retrospective series of 57 patients where tceMEP/SSEP monitoring likely prevented irreversible neurologic damage. Though further prospective studies are needed, there may be a role for combined tceMEP/SSEP monitoring for patients undergoing anterior cervical decompression without myelopathy.

Os odontoideum: etiology and surgical management

OBJECTIVE

Os odontoideum is an independent ossicle of variable size with smooth circumferential cortical margins separated from the foreshortened odontoid peg. The etiology of os odontoideum remains controversial, but there is now emerging consensus on the traumatic etiology of os odontoideum rather than a congenital source.

RESULTS

We reviewed the literature of os odontoideum. Patients with this condition can be asymptomatic or present with wide range of neurological dysfunctions. Although the diagnosis of os odontoideum can be made with plain x-rays, further imaging modalities including magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography angiography have improved the preoperative planning.

CONCLUSION

There is a role for conservative treatment of an asymptomatic incidentally found, radiologically stable, and noncompressive os odontoideum. Conversely, surgery has a definite role in symptomatic cases. The main method of surgical treatment today is posterior decompression after reduction and fusion via independent C1 and C2 instrumentation. Irreducible, persistent anterior compression from os odontoideum can be approached by a transoral route with good results in experienced hands.