Magnetic resonance imaging versus ultrasonography for the in utero evaluation of central nervous system anomalies

Prenatal ultrasound for the diagnosis of the agenesis of corpus callosum: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Prenatal ultrasound has been regularly used as the screening tool for agenesis of corpus callosum (ACC) of the fetuses, which were mainly suspected on the basis of indirect signs rather than the visualization of the CC. However, the diagnostic accuracy of prenatal ultrasound for ACC, compared to the gold standard of postmortem diagnosis or postnatal images, is still unknown. This meta-analysis was performed to comprehensively evaluate the efficacy of prenatal ultrasound for the diagnosis of ACC.

METHODS

Studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of prenatal ultrasound for ACC compared to postmortem diagnosis or postnatal images were retrieved by searching PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were calculated with a random-effects model. The diagnostic accuracy was measured by summarized area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) curve.

RESULTS

Twelve studies involving 544 fetuses with suspected anomalies of central nervous system were included, and 143 of them were with validated diagnosis of ACC. Pooled results showed that prenatal ultrasound has satisfying diagnostic efficacy for ACC, with the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios of 0.72 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.39-0.91), 0.98 (95% CI: 0.79-1.00), 43.73 (95% CI: 3.42-558.74, and 0.29 (95% CI: 0.11-0.74), respectively. The pooled AUC was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.92-0.96), suggesting good diagnostic performance of prenatal ultrasound. Subgroup analysis according to the prenatal ultrasound procedures showed a better diagnostic efficacy of neurosonography than that of regular ultrasound screening (sensitivity: 0.84 versus 0.57, specificity: 0.98 versus 0.89, and AUC: 0.97 versus 0.78).

CONCLUSIONS

Prenatal ultrasound, particularly for the neurosonography, confers satisfying efficacy for the diagnosis of ACC.

Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging features of fetal intracranial cystic lesions: A pictorial essay

This pictorial essay focuses on ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of fetal intracranial cysts. Intracranial cysts are common findings in prenatal imaging, and if great attention is paid to their size, location, and imaging features, they can be diagnosed accurately. They are usually detected by fetal ultrasound exams. However, when ultrasound data on cystic lesion characteristics is insufficient, MRI and fetal neurosonogram are the best options for detecting other associated anomalies. The prognosis is highly dependent on their location and whether they are associated with other fetal anomalies.

Fetal brain imaging: A comparison between fetal ultrasonography and intra uterine magnetic resonance imaging (a systematic review and meta-analysis)

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare ultrasound (US) and intra uterine MRI (IUMRI) of the brain in the diagnosis of fetal brain abnormalities.

METHODS

The present systematic review is done based on guidelines for preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis. All major articles comparing fetal US with IUMRI in fetuses with suspected brain abnormalities were qualified. Articles published before 2010 were excluded from the study. An I²  > 20% was considered as a sign of significant change. The statistical analysis was done using STATA -15 and Meta-Disk 1.4 applications.

RESULTS

Five articles were considered for meta-analysis. The sensitivity of US and IUMRI in diagnosing fetal abnormalities were 86% and 95%, respectively. The corresponding rates for specificity were 77% and 80%. IUMRI and US were concordant in 72.5% (95% CI: 68%-77%) of diagnoses. However, IUMRI added information in 21.7% of cases, while US added value was only 1.48.

CONCLUSION

Our results approved the good diagnostic performance of both US and IUMRI in confirming fetal brain normal development and emphasized that US is an appropriate screening technique in pregnancy. In cases of detected abnormalities in US, IUMRI is suggested as it was the most accurate imaging method and added information about the diagnosis in 22.2% of cases.

MRI in the diagnosis of fetal developmental brain abnormalities: the MERIDIAN diagnostic accuracy study

BACKGROUND

Ultrasonography has been the mainstay of antenatal screening programmes in the UK for many years. Technical factors and physical limitations may result in suboptimal images that can lead to incorrect diagnoses and inaccurate counselling and prognostic information being given to parents. Previous studies suggest that the addition of in utero magnetic resonance imaging (iuMRI) may improve diagnostic accuracy for fetal brain abnormalities. These studies have limitations, including a lack of an outcome reference diagnosis (ORD), which means that improvements could not be assessed accurately.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the diagnostic impact, acceptability and cost consequence of iuMRI among fetuses with a suspected fetal brain abnormality.

DESIGN

A pragmatic, prospective, multicentre, cohort study with a health economics analysis and a sociological substudy.

SETTING

Sixteen UK fetal medicine centres.

PARTICIPANTS

Pregnant women aged ≥ 16 years carrying a fetus (at least 18 weeks' gestation) with a suspected brain abnormality detected on ultrasonography.

INTERVENTIONS

Participants underwent iuMRI and the findings were reported to their referring fetal medicine clinician.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Pregnancy outcome was followed up and an ORD from postnatal imaging or postmortem autopsy/imaging collected when available. Developmental data from the Bayley Scales of Infant Development and questionnaires were collected from the surviving infants aged 2-3 years. Data on the management of the pregnancy before and after the iuMRI were collected to inform the economic evaluation. Two surveys collected data on patient acceptability of iuMRI and qualitative interviews with participants and health professionals were undertaken.

RESULTS

The primary analysis consisted of 570 fetuses. The absolute diagnostic accuracies of ultrasonography and iuMRI were 68% and 93%, respectively [a difference of 25%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 21% to 29%]. The difference between ultrasonography and iuMRI increased with gestational age. In the 18-23 weeks group, the figures were 70% for ultrasonography and 92% for iuMRI (difference of 23%, 95% CI 18% to 27%); in the ≥ 24 weeks group, the figures were 65% for ultrasonography and 94% for iuMRI (difference of 29%, 95% CI 23% to 36%). Patient acceptability was high, with at least 95% of respondents stating that they would have iuMRI again in a similar situation. Health professional interviews suggested that iuMRI was acceptable to clinicians and that iuMRI was useful as an adjunct to ultrasonography, but not as a replacement. Across a range of scenarios, iuMRI resulted in additional costs compared with ultrasonography alone. The additional cost was consistently < £600 per patient and the cost per management decision appropriately changed was always < £3000. There is potential for reporting bias from the referring clinicians on the diagnostic and prognostic outcomes. Lower than anticipated follow-up rates at 3 years of age were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

iuMRI as an adjunct to ultrasonography significantly improves the diagnostic accuracy and confidence for the detection of fetal brain abnormalities. An evaluation of the use of iuMRI for cases of isolated microcephaly and the diagnosis of fetal spine abnormalities is recommended. Longer-term follow-up studies of children diagnosed with fetal brain abnormalities are required to fully assess the functional significance of the diagnoses.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN27626961.

FUNDING

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 23, No. 49. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

The prevalence and the adding value of fetal MRI imaging in midline cerebral anomalies

Background

Foetal MR imaging is widely accepted as an adjunct to foetal ultrasonography; however, there are many controversies regarding its importance and indications. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate foetuses with different midline cerebral abnormalities, to determine the prevalence of these anomalies, to define the role of foetal MRI, and to compare MRI and ultrasound (US) result with postnatal MRI findings. Seventy-eight pregnant women who had foetuses with CNS abnormalities detected by sonogram were included. Foetuses with midline anomalies were selected and evaluated by anomaly scan foetal US, pre- and postnatal MRI.

Results

Midline brain anomalies were found in 47.4% of foetuses with brain anomalies. Holoprosencephaly was found in 24.3% of midline anomaly foetuses, corpus callosum abnormalities (ACC) were detected in 40.5%, midline intracranial mass lesions in 2.7%, and midline posterior fossa anomalies in 32.4%. An agreement between MRI and US in the main diagnosis was in 56.76% of cases; MRI added information to US findings in 43.2% of cases, and US added information to MRI findings in 8.1% of cases.

Conclusion

In evaluating midline cerebral anomalies, US and MRI are complementary techniques. US is the primary survey, and MRI can add additional information and/or change the main diagnosis.

5-year experience of a tertiary center in major congenital abnormalities in singleton pregnancies

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate major congenital abnormalities delivered or terminated at our institution between 2014 and 2018.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Necessary information was retrieved from the registries of the delivery room and electronic database of Hacettepe University Hospital, Ankara.

RESULTS

This study was consisted of 307 major congenital anomalies. The incidence of major congenital anomalies was 2.9 per 1,000 live births, while the majority of the cases were related to cardiovascular, central nervous system, and diaphragmatic hernia with 97, 87, and 25 cases at each group, respectively. Rate of termination of pregnancy (TOP) and live birth were 35.1 and 59.2%, respectively. The overall infant mortality rate was 28.9% in cases with live birth, while this rate was highest in cardiovascular system abnormalities and diaphragmatic hernia. Out of 182 newborns, 92.8% admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit after the delivery. Median gestational week at TOP was 21(20).

CONCLUSION

We have shown that TOP and infant mortality rates were 35.1 and 28.9%, respectively in pregnancies with fetal malformations. Detailed multidisciplinary counseling must be provided for parents in pregnancies with major congenital abnormalities.

Fetal MRI of the central nervous system: State-of-the-art

Prenatal ultrasonographic (US) examination is considered as the first tool in the assessment of fetal abnormalities. However, several large-scale studies point out that some malformations, in particular central nervous system (CNS) anomalies, are not well characterized through US. Therefore, the actual malformation severity is not always related to prenatal ultrasound (US) findings. Over the past 20 years, ultrafast Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) has progressively increased as a prenatal 3rd level diagnostic technique with a good sensitivity, particularly for the study of fetal CNS malformations. In fact, CNS anomalies are the most common clinical indications for fetal MRI, representing about 80% of the total examinations. This review covers the recent literature on fetal brain MRI, with emphasis on techniques, safety and indications.

Two Cases of Craniospinal Rachischisis Totalis: Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Diagnosis and Review of Neural Tube Defects in the Indian Context with Implications for Folate Fortification

Craniospinal rachischisis is a rare and severe form of neural tube defects (NTDs), which is always fatal. It is characterized by anencephaly accompanied by a bony defect of the spine and exposure of neural tissue. We describe the two patients with ultrasonographic and magnetic resonance imaging appearance of craniospinal rachischisis totalis, detected antenatally at 22 and 25 weeks of gestation, and confirmed after termination of pregnancy. The multifactorial etiology of NTDs, with specific reference to folate deficiency, is discussed with possible role of folate fortification in the Indian context.

A systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the contribution of mr imaging to the diagnosis of foetal brain abnormalities In Utero

Objectives

This systematic review was undertaken to define the diagnostic performance of in utero MR (iuMR) imaging when attempting to confirm, exclude or provide additional information compared with the information provided by prenatal ultrasound scans (USS) when there is a suspicion of foetal brain abnormality.

Methods

Electronic databases were searched as well as relevant journals and conference proceedings. Reference lists of applicable studies were also explored. Data extraction was conducted by two reviewers independently to identify relevant studies for inclusion in the review. Inclusion criteria were original research that reported the findings of prenatal USS and iuMR imaging and findings in terms of accuracy as judged by an outcome reference diagnosis for foetal brain abnormalities.

Results

34 studies met the inclusion criteria which allowed diagnostic accuracy to be calculated in 959 cases, all of which had an outcome reference diagnosis determined by postnatal imaging, surgery or autopsy. iuMR imaging gave the correct diagnosis in 91 % which was an increase of 16 % above that achieved by USS alone.

Conclusion

iuMR imaging makes a significant contribution to the diagnosis of foetal brain abnormalities, increasing the diagnostic accuracy achievable by USS alone.

Key points

• Ultrasound is the primary modality for monitoring foetal brain development during pregnancy

• iuMRI used together with ultrasound is more accurate for detecting foetal brain abnormalities

• iuMR imaging is most helpful for detecting midline brain abnormalities

• The moderate heterogeneity of reviewed studies may compromise findings

Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of fetal anomalies: a blinded case-control study

OBJECTIVES

To compare the accuracy of two-dimensional ultrasound (2D-US), three-dimensional ultrasound (3D-US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the diagnosis of congenital anomalies without prior knowledge of indications and previous imaging findings.

METHODS

This was a prospective, blinded case-control study comprising women with a singleton pregnancy with fetal congenital abnormalities identified on clinical ultrasound and those with an uncomplicated pregnancy. All women volunteered to undergo 2D-US, 3D-US and MRI, which were performed at one institution. Different examiners at a collaborating institution performed image interpretation. Sensitivity and specificity of the three imaging methods were calculated for individual anomalies, based on postnatal imaging and/or autopsy as the definitive diagnosis. Diagnostic confidence was graded on a four-point Likert scale.

RESULTS

A total of 157 singleton pregnancies were enrolled, however nine cases were excluded owing to incomplete outcome, resulting in 148 fetuses (58 cases and 90 controls) included in the final analysis. Among cases, 13 (22.4%) had central nervous system (CNS) anomalies, 40 (69.0%) had non-CNS anomalies and five (8.6%) had both CNS and non-CNS anomalies. The main findings were: (1) MRI was more sensitive than 3D-US for diagnosing CNS anomalies (MRI, 88.9% (16/18) vs 3D-US, 66.7% (12/18) vs 2D-US, 72.2% (13/18); McNemar's test for MRI vs 3D-US: P = 0.046); (2) MRI provided additional information affecting prognosis and/or counseling in 22.2% (4/18) of fetuses with CNS anomalies; (3) 2D-US, 3D-US and MRI had similar sensitivity for diagnosing non-CNS anomalies; (4) specificity for all anomalies was highest for 3D-US (MRI, 85.6% (77/90) vs 3D-US, 94.4% (85/90) vs 2D-US, 92.2% (83/90); McNemar's test for MRI vs 3D-US: P = 0.03); and (5) the confidence of MRI for ruling out certain CNS abnormalities (usually questionable for cortical dysplasias or hemorrhage) that were not confirmed after delivery was lower than it was for 2D-US and 3D-US.

CONCLUSIONS

MRI was more sensitive than ultrasonography and provided additional information that changed prognosis, counseling or management in 22.2% of fetuses with CNS anomalies. False-positive diagnoses for subtle CNS findings were higher with MRI than with ultrasonography. Copyright © 2015 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Added value of fetal MRI in fetuses with suspected brain abnormalities on neurosonography: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the additional diagnostic value of fetal Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in fetuses with suspected brain abnormalities identified with advanced neurosonography (NS).

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed for studies reporting on a comparison between diagnosis with NS and MRI, in fetuses suspected for brain abnormalities. Abnormalities detected on NS were compared with those detected on MRI as well as with postnatal imaging findings to assess the added value of fetal MRI.

RESULTS

We included 27 articles, reporting on 1184 cases in which NS and MRI diagnosis were compared. In 65% of cases [773/1184] fetal NS and fetal MRI diagnosis agreed completely. In 23% [312/1184], MRI showed additional or different pathology. In 8% [99/1184], MRI rejected the NS diagnosis with normal brain as conclusion. For 454 cases a comparison with postnatal imaging could be made. Compared to the postnatal diagnosis, fetal MRI diagnosis agreed completely in 80% [364/454] and fetal NS in 54% [243/454] (difference 27%, 95% CI 21-33%). Additional abnormalities were found on postnatal imaging in 36% [164/454] after NS and in 14% [61/454] after fetal MRI.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis shows that fetal MRI in addition to NS improves diagnostic accuracy in detecting brain abnormalities.

Prenatal imaging of occipital encephaloceles

INTRODUCTION

This retrospective study aims to describe systematically the fetal cerebral MR morphology in cases with occipital meningoencephaloceles using standard and advanced fetal MRI techniques.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The 1.5-tesla MR examinations (T1- and T2-weighted imaging, echo planar imaging, EPI, diffusion-weighted imaging, DWI) of 14 fetuses with occipital/parietal meningoencephaloceles were retrospectively analyzed for the classification of anatomic characteristics. A diffusion tensor sequence was performed in 5 cases.

RESULTS

In 9/14 cases the occipital lobes were entirely or partially included in the encephalocele sac. Typical features of Chiari III malformation were seen in 6/14 cases. The displaced brain appeared grossly disorganized in 6/14. The brainstem displayed abnormal 'kinking'/rotation (3/14), a z-shape (1/14) and/or a molar tooth-like configuration of the midbrain (3/14). Tractography revealed the presence and position of sensorimotor tracts in 5/5 and the corpus callosum in 3/5. DWI was helpful in the identification of a displaced brain (in 8/9). EPI visualized the anatomy of draining cerebral veins in 7/9 cases. Clinical (9/14) and MRI (7/14) follow-up data are presented.

DISCUSSION

Encephaloceles show a wide range of morphological heterogeneity. Fetal MRI serves as an accurate tool in the visualization of brainstem, white matter pathway and cerebral venous involvement and facilitates the detection of specific underlying syndromes such as ciliopathies.

Additional value of fetal magnetic resonance imaging in the prenatal diagnosis of central nervous system anomalies: a systematic review of the literature

OBJECTIVES

To analyze literature on the additional value of fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in assessing central nervous system (CNS) anomalies suspected by ultrasound.

METHODS

A search was performed of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane library and the reference lists of identified articles. Inclusion criteria were CNS anomalies suspected/diagnosed by ultrasound, MRI performed after ultrasound, and postmortem examination by autopsy or postnatal assessment. MOOSE guidelines were followed. Outcomes assessed were positive/negative agreement between ultrasound and MRI, additional information provided by MRI, and discordance between ultrasound and MRI. Pooled sensitivity and specificity of MRI were calculated using the DerSimonian-Laird method. Postnatal/postmortem examinations were used as the reference standard.

RESULTS

We identified thirteen articles which included 710 fetuses undergoing both ultrasound and MRI. MRI confirmed ultrasound-positive findings in 65.4% of fetuses and provided additional information in 22.1%. MRI disclosed CNS anomalies in 18.4% of fetuses. In 2.0% of cases, ultrasound was more accurate than MRI. In 30% of fetuses, MRI was so different from ultrasound that the clinical management changed. Agreement was observed mainly for ventriculomegaly (51.3%). Disagreement was noted mainly for midline anomalies (48.6%). Pooled sensitivity of MRI was 97% (95% CI, 95-98%) and pooled specificity was 70% (95% CI, 58-81%).

CONCLUSIONS

MRI supplements the information provided by ultrasound. It should be considered in selected fetuses with CNS anomalies suspected on ultrasound.

Accuracy of neurosonography and MRI in clinical management of fetuses referred with central nervous system abnormalities

OBJECTIVE

To assess the accuracy of expert neurosonography (two- and three-dimensional NSG) in the characterization of major fetal central nervous system (CNS) anomalies seen at a tertiary referral center and to report the differential clinical usefulness of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) used as a second-line diagnostic procedure in the same cohort.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of all 773 fetuses with confirmed CNS abnormalities referred to our center between 2005 and 2012. The following variables were analyzed: gestational age at NSG and MRI, NSG and MRI diagnoses, indication for MRI (confirmation of NSG findings; diagnostic doubt; search for possible additional brain anomalies), association with other malformations, diagnostic accuracy of NSG vs MRI (no additional clinical value for either MRI or NSG; additional information with clinical/prognostic significance on MRI relative to NSG; additional information with clinical/prognostic significance on NSG relative to MRI, NSG and MRI concordant but incorrect) and final diagnosis, which was made at autopsy or postnatal MRI/surgery.

RESULTS

CNS malformations were associated with other anomalies in 372/773 (48.1%) cases and were isolated in the remaining 401 (51.9%) cases. NSG alone was able to establish the diagnosis in 647/773 (83.7%) cases. MRI was performed in 126 (16.3%) cases. The indication for MRI was: confirmation of NSG diagnosis in 59 (46.8%) cases; diagnostic query (in the case of inconclusive or uncertain finding on NSG) in 20 (15.9%) cases; search for possible additional brain anomalies in 47 (37.3%) cases. NSG and MRI were concordant and correct in 109/126 (86.5%) cases. Clinically relevant findings were evident on MRI alone in 10/126 (7.9%) cases (1.3% of the whole population) and on NSG alone in 6/126 (4.8%) cases; in all six of these cases, MRI had been performed at < 24 weeks of gestation. In one case, both NSG and MRI diagnoses were incorrect. The main type of malformation in w ich MRI played an important diagnostic role was space-occupying lesions, MRI identifying clinically relevant findings in 42.9% (3/7) of these cases.

CONCLUSIONS

(1) In a tertiary referral center with good NSG expertise in the assessment of fetal CNS malformations, MRI is likely to be of help in a limited proportion of cases; (2) MRI is more useful after 24 weeks of gestation; (3) the lesions whose diagnosis is most likely to benefit from MRI are gross space-occupying lesions.

Standardized fetal anatomical examination using magnetic resonance imaging: a feasibility study

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether a standard complete fetal anatomical survey, as recommended for ultrasound examination guidelines, is feasible using a standardized magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocol.

METHODS

Based on guidelines for ultrasound examination, we created a specific MRI protocol for fetal anatomical survey. This protocol was then tested prospectively in 100 women undergoing fetal MRI examination for various specific indications at a median gestational age of 30 weeks. The feasibility of using MRI to perform the fetal anatomical survey was analyzed by two reviewers (A and B) based on 26 predefined anatomical criteria, yielding a score ranging from 0 to 26 (26 meaning successful complete anatomical study). Reproducibility was analyzed using percentage agreement and modified kappa statistics.

RESULTS

The mean score for the standardized MRI anatomical survey was 24.6 (SD, 1.4; range, 15-26) for Reviewer A and 24.2 (SD, 1.7; range, 15-26) for Reviewer B (P = 0.1). Twenty-two, two and two criteria could be assessed in > 95%, 80-95% and < 80% of cases by Reviewer A and 19, four and three criteria could be assessed in > 95%, 80-95% and < 80% of cases by Reviewer B. For both reviewers, the two most difficult criteria to evaluate were aorta and pulmonary artery. Inter-reviewer agreement was above 90% for 22 of the 26 anatomical criteria and adjusted kappa coefficients for each criterion demonstrated good, moderate and poor agreement for 22, two and two criteria, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our data support the hypothesis that standardized fetal anatomical examination might be achieved and reproducible using MRI, although improvement is required for the cardiac part of the examination.

Prenatal diagnosis of spinal dysraphism

INTRODUCTION

Since intrauterine repair of open spinal dysraphism have demonstrated promising results, it has become crucial to accurately define the various prenatal pathologies. The embryogenesis of spinal dysraphism according to a clinical neuroradiological classification is reviewed, with special emphasis on the recent advances in prenatal ultrasound (US), such as high-frequency linear transducers and three-dimensional imaging.

FUNDINGS

The role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the fetus as a complementary tool for delineating complex fetal spinal anomalies and further defining associated central nervous system (CNS) anomalies is explored. Differentiation between normal appearance of the fetal spine and the wide range of congenital neural tube defects are demonstrated in both modalities with special emphasis on their complementary role in the accurate diagnosis of neural tube defects.

Encefalocele basal esfenoetmoidal associada a fissura labiopalatina mediana: relato de caso

Associação de encefalocele basal esfenoetmoidal com fissura labiopalatina é extremamente rara. Relatamos um caso de uma criança de nove anos de idade apresentando uma fissura facial mediana com meningocele, que era evidente através da falha do palato como uma massa mediana intranasal pulsátil. Uma análise dos aspectos clínicos e radiológicos deste caso de disrafia craniana foi realizada.

Fetal hydrocephalus

INTRODUCTION

Hydrocephalus is the most frequent and devastating illness affecting a fetus. The development of both ultrasonography and magnetic resonance, associated with laboratorial tests, has greatly facilitated its diagnosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In the Fetal Medicine Service of the Federal University of São Paulo and in the Santa Joana/Pro-Matre Paulista Hospital Complex, in São Paulo, SP, Brazil, repeated cephalocenteses, ventricular-amniotic shunting, and neuroendoscopy were used to treat 57 fetuses with hydrocephalus, all of them at a gestational age under 32 weeks. Another eight fetuses had myelomeningocele and underwent correctional open surgery to prevent hydrocephalus.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients were followed up for a period longer than 3 years and had their intelligence coefficient assessed: 26 of them were considered normal (IQ above 70); six had mild or moderate handicaps (IQ from 35 to 70), and seven were severely handicapped (IQ below 35). Out of the eight patients operated for correction of myelomeningocele, only two came to require shunting. There were no cases of maternal morbidity, and no infectious condition was observed in any of the patients subjected to intrauterine treatment.

CONCLUSION

Selected cases of isolated, evolutive, non-destructive hydrocephaly diagnosed before 32 gestational weeks may benefit from fetal neurosurgical procedures. With the accuracy improvement of diagnoses, the number of patients fitting into that group has become very small.