Editorial: Mirror aneurysms

Patient and aneurysm characteristics associated with rupture risk of multiple intracranial aneurysms in the anterior circulation system

BACKGROUND

Multiple intracranial aneurysms (MIAs) are associated with poorer outcomes after rupture than are single intracranial aneurysms (SIAs). Although the risk factors for intracranial aneurysm rupture have been widely investigated, few studies have focused on MIAs. Thus, the present study aimed to determine whether there are differences in the patient and aneurysm characteristics between those with ruptured and unruptured anterior circulation MIAs (AC-MIAs).

METHOD

The present study included 97 patients with AC-MIAs (58 ruptured, 39 unruptured). Data regarding patient characteristics, aneurysm location, mirror aneurysms (MirAns), and bleb formations were collected from medical records and angiography images. Three-dimensional (3D) geometries generated with a 3D Slicer were evaluated to determine the range of morphological parameters. A univariate analysis was conducted to identify significant differences between the groups and receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed for each morphological parameter.

RESULTS

There are significantly fewer patients younger than 40 years of age in the ruptured group (P = 0.04); although the groups did not significantly differ with regard to smoking and hypertension, the ruptured group included significantly more current smokers who smoked more than 20 cigarettes per day (P = 0.025) and significantly more patients with a history of hypertension but an irregular use of anti-hypertensive medications (P = 0.043). Ruptured AC-MIAs were more likely to be located in the internal carotid artery (ICA) communicating artery (ICA C7) and anterior communicating artery (AComA; P = 0.000), to have formed a pair of MirAns (P = 0.001), and to have a bleb formation (P = 0.000). In terms of morphological parameters, the two groups differed significantly regarding aneurysm size (P = 0.000), neck width (P = 0.016), bottleneck factor (BNF; P = 0.000), height/width ratio (H/W; P = 0.031), aspect ratio (AR; P = 0.000) and size ratio (SR; P = 0.000). Additionally, the ROC analyses revealed that the optimal threshold size for rupture was 4.00 mm and that the SR had the highest area under the curve (AUC) value (0.826).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study found that current smokers who smoked more than 20 cigarettes per day and those with hypertension but an irregular use of anti-hypertensive medications were more likely to suffer from rupture. Aneurysm location and bleb formation were closely related to the rupture of AC-MIAs, and SR was a better predictor of AC-MIAs rupture status than size, neck width, BNF, H/W and AR. These findings should be verified by future prospective follow-up studies of AC-MIAs.

Clinical characteristics and preferential location of intracranial mirror aneurysms: a comparison with non-mirror multiple and single aneurysms

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of our study was to compare the clinical characteristics and preferential localization of aneurysms in three patient groups: single aneurysm, non-mirror multiple aneurysms, and mirror aneurysms.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical and radiological data of 2223 consecutive patients harboring 3068 aneurysms registered at the Toronto Western Hospital between May 1994 and November 2010. The patients were divided into single, non-mirror multiple, or mirror aneurysm groups. Expected incidences of mirror aneurysms at each location were calculated on the basis of the single aneurysm incidences at each location.

RESULTS

Patients with mirror aneurysms (n = 197) did not differ from patients with non-mirror multiple aneurysms (n = 392) in having female predominance (81.7 vs. 76.3 %) or a family history of intracranial aneurysm (20.5 vs. 17.6 %). When compared with expected incidences at each location, mirror aneurysms were more frequently found at the cavernous internal carotid artery (30 vs. 11.5 %) (p < 0.0001). Mirror aneurysms involving the posterior circulation were less frequent (6.7 %) than aneurysms in the single (19.6 %) or non-mirror multiple aneurysm groups (18.9 %) (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Patients with mirror aneurysms had similar clinical characteristics to non-mirror multiple aneurysm patients. Mirror aneurysms showed a predilection for the cavernous carotid artery, whereas they were comparatively rare in the posterior circulation.