|
1
|
Woodworth DC, Scambray KA, Corrada MM, Kawas CH, Sajjadi SA. Neuroimaging in the Oldest-Old: A Review of the Literature. J Alzheimers Dis 2021; 82:129-147. [PMID: 33998539 DOI: 10.3233/jad-201578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
The oldest-old, those 85 years and older, are the fastest growing segment of the population and present with the highest prevalence of dementia. Given the importance of neuroimaging measures to understand aging and dementia, the objective of this study was to review neuroimaging studies performed in oldest-old participants. We used PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science search engines to identify in vivo CT, MRI, and PET neuroimaging studies either performed in the oldest-old or that addressed the oldest-old as a distinct group in analyses. We identified 60 studies and summarized the main group characteristics and findings. Generally, oldest-old participants presented with greater atrophy compared to younger old participants, with most studies reporting a relatively stable constant decline in brain volumes over time. Oldest-old participants with greater global atrophy and atrophy in key brain structures such as the medial temporal lobe were more likely to have dementia or cognitive impairment. The oldest-old presented with a high burden of white matter lesions, which were associated with various lifestyle factors and some cognitive measures. Amyloid burden as assessed by PET, while high in the oldest-old compared to younger age groups, was still predictive of transition from normal to impaired cognition, especially when other adverse neuroimaging measures (atrophy and white matter lesions) were also present. While this review highlights past neuroimaging research in the oldest-old, it also highlights the dearth of studies in this important population. It is imperative to perform more neuroimaging studies in the oldest-old to better understand aging and dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Davis C Woodworth
- Department of Neurology, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.,Institute for Memory Impairments and Neurological Disorders, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Kiana A Scambray
- Department of Neurology, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.,Institute for Memory Impairments and Neurological Disorders, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - María M Corrada
- Department of Neurology, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.,Institute for Memory Impairments and Neurological Disorders, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.,Department of Epidemiology, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Claudia H Kawas
- Department of Neurology, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.,Institute for Memory Impairments and Neurological Disorders, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.,Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - S Ahmad Sajjadi
- Department of Neurology, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.,Institute for Memory Impairments and Neurological Disorders, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
|
3
|
Diagnostic role of magnetic resonance imaging in assessing orofacial pain and paresthesia. J Craniofac Surg 2014; 25:1748-51. [PMID: 25148636 DOI: 10.1097/scs.0000000000001000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of CT and MRI in evaluating orofacial pain and paresthesia. A total of 96 patients with orofacial pain and/or paresthesia were included in this study. The patients who underwent CT and/or MRI examinations were assessed, and the efficacy of CT and/or MRI examinations in detecting the causative disease of the orofacial pain and paresthesia was evaluated. Seventy (72.9%) of 96 patients underwent CT and/or MRI examinations. Whereas CT examinations detected 2 diseases (4.5%) in 44 tests, 13 diseases (37.1%) were detected in 35 MRI examinations. Seven (53.8%) of 13 diseases, which were detected by MRI, were found in elderly patients. A high percentage of patients, who claimed orofacial pain and paresthesia, have other diseases in their brain, especially in elderly patients, and MRI is more useful than CT for evaluating these patients.
Collapse
|