Analysis of interpeak latencies of brainstem auditory evoked potential waveforms during microvascular decompression of cranial nerve VII for hemifacial spasm

Usefulness of intraoperative monitoring in microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To review the diagnostic accuracy and possible added value of Brainstem Auditory Evoked Potentials (BAEP) monitoring and Lateral Spread Response (LSR) monitoring in microvascular decompression surgery for hemifacial spasms.

METHODS

For this systematic review we followed the PRISMA guidelines. We searched different databases and bibliographies of articles. We included studies on BAEP and LSR monitoring that reported data on hearing outcome or efficacy. Selected studies were assessed for bias using the MINORS tool.

RESULTS

64 articles were selected for qualitative synthesis, 42 met inclusion criteria for meta-analysis. The overall incidence of hearing loss was 3.4%. For BAEP monitoring AUC and pooled OR with 95% confidence interval were 0.911 (0.753-0.933) and 7.99 (3.85-16.60) respectively. Short-term data on LSR monitoring showed an overall spasm relief rate of 89% with pooled OR, sensitivity and specificity with a 95% confidence interval of 8.80 (4.82-16.08), 0.911 (0.863-0.943) and 0.451 (0.342-0.564) respectively. Long-term data on LSR monitoring showed an overall spasm relief rate of 95% with pooled OR, sensitivity and specificity with a 95% confidence interval of 4.06 (2.15-7.64), 0.871 (0.817-0.911) and 0.39 (0.294-0.495) respectively.

CONCLUSION

The alarm criteria, a wave V latency prolongation of 1ms or a wave V amplitude decrement of 50%, proposed by the 'American Clinical Neurophysiology Society' are a sensitive predictor for postoperative hearing loss. Other BAEP wave changes, for example, complete loss of wave V, are more specific but correspond to irreversible damage and are therefore not useful as warning criteria. LSR monitoring has high diagnostic accuracy at short-term follow-up. At long-term follow-up, diagnostic accuracy decreases because most patients get spasm relief regardless of their LSR status. LSR persistence after surgery has a good long-term outcome, as long as an extensive exploration of the facial nerve has been performed.

A New Score to Predict the Risk of Hearing Impairment After Microvascular Decompression for Hemifacial Spasm

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative monitoring of brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs) has been implemented to reduce the risk of hearing impairment during microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate intraoperative monitoring of BAEPs during microvascular decompression in patients with hemifacial spasm for predicting the risk of hearing impairment after surgery.

METHODS

This prospective study included 100 patients. BAEPs were recorded for all patients. We established a scoring system for the changes in wave I amplitude, I-III interpeak latency, and wave V amplitude and latency. For each change, total points were calculated, and a score out of 6 was assigned to every patient. We classified the patients based on the points scored into 3 risk groups: low-risk (0-3), medium-risk (4-5), and high-risk (6). Further, the correlation between the score and the hearing outcome was evaluated to detect the incidence and degree of hearing impairment.

RESULTS

Eighty-seven patients scored 0 to 3, 10 scored 4 to 5, and 3 scored 6. The degree of hearing impairment was proportionate to the score recorded at the end of surgery, and patients in the low-risk group showed no impairment; medium-risk group, deterioration of maximum 2 grades according to World Health Organization classification of hearing impairment; and high-risk group, deterioration of 3 to 4 grades.

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative monitoring of BAEPs evaluated through our scoring system was valuable in predicting hearing impairment after surgery.