The use of abdominal binders to treat over-shunting headaches

How to define CSF overdrainage: a systematic literature review

PURPOSE

Overdrainage (OD) is one of the most frequent complications related to drainage of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). It is mostly associated with valve-bearing shunt systems but should probably be considered as a risk factor in any type of CSF diversion procedure. There is extreme variation in the reported incidence of OD due to the lack of consensus on defining criteria and an unclear perception of the pathophysiology. Hence, OD is probably underreported and underestimated. The objective of this paper was to establish a definition of OD, based on a systematic review of the literature.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted in MEDLNE and EMBASE. Studies providing a definition or a description of diagnostic findings related to OD in ventriculoperitoneal shunt treated hydrocephalus were included. Non-English titles, abstracts and manuscripts were excluded. Extracted descriptions were graded into five groups (class I-V studies) based on how precise the terminology used to describe OD was. Class I studies were included for further analysis and characteristics of OD were extracted. The quality of included descriptions was assessed by a clinical expert panel.

RESULTS

A total of 1309 studies were screened, 190 were graded into groups, and 22, which provided specific definitions or descriptions of OD, were graded as class I studies. We extracted 32 different characteristics consistent with OD (e.g., clinical symptoms, radiological signs, and syndromes).

CONCLUSION

There was an overall agreement that CSF overdrainage following implantation of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt in a mixed pediatric and adult population is characterized as a persistent condition with clinically manifestations as postural dependent headache, nausea, and vomiting and/or radiological signs of slim ventricles and/or subdural collections.

Shunt-dependent hydrocephalus: management style among members of the American Society of Pediatric Neurosurgeons

OBJECTIVE The authors conducted a survey to evaluate differences in the understanding and management of shunt-dependent hydrocephalus among members of the American Society of Pediatric Neurosurgeons (ASPN). METHODS Surveys were sent to all 204 active ASPN members in September 2014. One hundred thirty responses were received, representing a 64% response rate. Respondents were asked 13 multiple-choice and free-response questions regarding 4 fundamental problems encountered in shunted-hydrocephalus management: shunt malfunction, chronic cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) overdrainage, chronic headaches, and slit ventricle syndrome (SVS). RESULTS Respondents agreed that shunt malfunction occurs most often as the result of ventricular catheter obstruction. Despite contrary evidence in the literature, most respondents (66%) also believed that choroid plexus is the tissue most often found in obstructed proximal catheters. However, free-text responses revealed that the respondents' understanding of the underlying pathophysiology of shunt obstruction was highly variable and included growth, migration, or adherence of choroid plexus, CSF debris, catheter position, inflammatory processes, and CSF overdrainage. Most respondents considered chronic CSF overdrainage to be a rare complication of shunting in their practice and reported wide variation in treatment protocols. Moreover, despite a lack of evidence in the literature, most respondents attributed chronic headaches in shunt patients to medical reasons (for example, migraines, tension). Accordingly, most respondents managed headaches with reassurance and/or referral to pain clinics. Lastly, there were variable opinions on the etiology of slit ventricle syndrome (SVS), which included early shunting, chronic overdrainage, and/or loss of brain compliance. Beyond shunt revision, respondents reported divergent SVS treatment preferences. CONCLUSIONS The survey shows that there is wide variability in the understanding and management of shunt-dependent hydrocephalus and its complications. Such discrepancies appear to be derived partly from inconsistent familiarity with existing literature but especially from a paucity of high-quality publications.