Neuronal immunoexpression and a distinct subtype of adult primary supratentorial glioblastoma with a better prognosis

Impact of frailty on survival glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype patients

PURPOSE

Frailty increases the risk of mortality among patients. We studied the prognostic significance of frailty using the modified 5-item frailty index (5-mFI) in patients harboring a newly diagnosed supratentorial glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed records of patients surgical treated at a single neurosurgical institution at the standard radiochemotherapy era (January 2006 - December 2021). Inclusion criteria were: age ≥ 18, newly diagnosed glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype, supratentorial location, available data to assess the 5-mFI index.

RESULTS

A total of 694 adult patients were included. The median overall survival was longer in the non-frail subgroup (5-mFI < 2, n = 538 patients; 14.3 months, 95%CI 12.5-16.0) than in the frail subgroup (5-mFI ≥ 2, n = 156 patients; 4.7 months, 95%CI 4.0-6.5 months; p < 0.001). 5-mFI ≥ 2 (adjusted Hazard Ratio (aHR) 1.31; 95%CI 1.07-1.61; p = 0.009) was an independent predictor of a shorter overall survival while age ≤ 60 years (aHR 0.78; 95%CI 0.66-0.93; p = 0.007), KPS score ≥ 70 (aHR 0.71; 95%CI 0.58-0.87; p = 0.001), unilateral location (aHR 0.67; 95%CI 0.52-0.87; p = 0.002), total removal (aHR 0.54; 95%CI 0.44-0.64; p < 0.0001), and standard radiochemotherapy protocol (aHR 0.32; 95%CI 0.26-0.38; p < 0.0001) were independent predictors of a longer overall survival. Frailty remained an independent predictor of overall survival within the subgroup of patients undergoing a first-line oncological treatment after surgery (n = 549) and within the subgroup of patients who benefited from a total removal plus adjuvant standard radiochemotherapy (n = 209).

CONCLUSION

In newly diagnosed supratentorial glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype patients treated at the standard combined radiochemotherapy era, frailty, defined using a 5-mFI score ≥ 2 was an independent predictor of overall survival.

Neurofilaments in neurologic disorders and beyond

Many neurologic diseases can initially present as a diagnostic challenge and even when a diagnosis is made, monitoring of disease activity, progression and response to therapy may be limited with existing clinical and paraclinical assessments. As such, the identification of disease specific biomarkers provides a promising avenue by which diseases can be effectively diagnosed, monitored and used as a prognostic indicator for long-term outcomes. Neurofilaments are an integral component of the neuronal cytoskeleton, where assessment of neurofilaments in the blood, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and diseased tissue has been shown to have value in providing diagnostic clarity, monitoring disease activity, tracking progression and treatment efficacy, as well as lending prognostic insight into long-term outcomes. As such, this review attempts to provide a glimpse into the structure and function of neurofilaments, their role in various neurologic and non-neurologic disorders, including uncommon conditions with recent knowledge of neurofilament-related pathology, as well as their applicability in future clinical practice.

Congress of neurological surgeons systematic review and evidence-based guidelines update on the role of emerging developments in the management of newly diagnosed glioblastoma

TARGET POPULATION

These recommendations apply to adult patients with newly diagnosed or suspected glioblastoma.

IMAGING

Question What imaging modalities are in development that may be able to provide improvements in diagnosis, and therapeutic guidance for individuals with newly diagnosed glioblastoma?

RECOMMENDATION

Level III: It is suggested that techniques utilizing magnetic resonance imaging for diffusion weighted imaging, and to measure cerebral blood and magnetic spectroscopic resonance imaging of N-acetyl aspartate, choline and the choline to N-acetyl aspartate index to assist in diagnosis and treatment planning in patients with newly diagnosed or suspected glioblastoma.

SURGERY

Question What new surgical techniques can be used to provide improved tumor definition and resectability to yield better tumor control and prognosis for individuals with newly diagnosed glioblastoma?

RECOMMENDATIONS

Level II: The use of 5-aminolevulinic acid is recommended to improve extent of tumor resection in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Level II: The use of 5-aminolevulinic acid is recommended to improve median survival and 2 year survival in newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients with clinical characteristics suggesting poor prognosis. Level III: It is suggested that, when available, patients be enrolled in properly designed clinical trials assessing the value of diffusion tensor imaging in improving the safety of patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma undergoing surgery.

NEUROPATHOLOGY

Question What new pathology techniques and measurement of biomarkers in tumor tissue can be used to provide improved diagnostic ability, and determination of therapeutic responsiveness and prognosis for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastomas?

RECOMMENDATIONS

Level II: Assessment of tumor MGMT promoter methylation status is recommended as a significant predictor of a longer progression free survival and overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed with glioblastoma. Level II: Measurement of tumor expression of neuron-glia-2, neurofilament protein, glutamine synthetase and phosphorylated STAT3 is recommended as a predictor of overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed with glioblastoma. Level III: Assessment of tumor IDH1 mutation status is suggested as a predictor of longer progression free survival and overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed with glioblastoma. Level III: Evaluation of tumor expression of Phosphorylated Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase protein, EGFR protein, and Insulin-like Growth Factor-Binding Protein-3 is suggested as a predictor of overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed with glioblastoma.

RADIATION

Question What radiation therapy techniques are in development that may be used to provide improved tumor control and prognosis for individuals with newly diagnosed glioblastomas?

RECOMMENDATIONS

Level III: It is suggested that patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma undergo pretreatment radio-labeled amino acid tracer positron emission tomography to assess areas at risk for tumor recurrence to assist in radiation treatment planning. Level III: It is suggested that, when available, patients be with newly diagnosed glioblastomas be enrolled in properly designed clinical trials of radiation dose escalation, altered fractionation, or new radiation delivery techniques.

CHEMOTHERAPY

Question What emerging chemotherapeutic agents or techniques are available to provide better tumor control and prognosis for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastomas?

RECOMMENDATION

Level III: As no emerging chemotherapeutic agents or techniques were identified in this review that improved tumor control and prognosis it is suggested that, when available, patients with newly diagnosed glioblastomas be enrolled in properly designed clinical trials of chemotherapy.

MOLECULAR AND TARGETED THERAPY

Question What new targeted therapy agents are available to provide better tumor control and prognosis for individuals with newly diagnosed glioblastomas?

RECOMMENDATION

Level III: As no new molecular and targeted therapies have clearly provided better tumor control and prognosis it is suggested that, when available, patients with newly diagnosed glioblastomas be enrolled in properly designed clinical trials of molecular and targeted therapies IMMUNOTHERAPY: Question What emerging immunotherapeutic agents or techniques are available to provide better tumor control and prognosis for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastomas?

RECOMMENDATION

Level III: As no immunotherapeutic agents have clearly provided better tumor control and prognosis it is suggested that, when available, patients with newly diagnosed glioblastomas be enrolled in properly designed clinical trials of immunologically-based therapies.

NOVEL THERAPIES

Question What novel therapies or techniques are in development to provide better tumor control and prognosis for individuals with newly diagnosed glioblastomas?

RECOMMENDATIONS

Level II: The use of tumor-treating fields is recommended for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma who have undergone surgical debulking and completed concurrent chemoradiation without progression of disease at the time of tumor-treating field therapy initiation. Level II: It is suggested that, when available, enrollment in properly designed studies of vector containing herpes simplex thymidine kinase gene and prodrug therapies be considered in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

Comorbid Medical Conditions as Predictors of Overall Survival in Glioblastoma Patients

Glioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive central nervous system tumor with a poor prognosis. This study was conducted to determine any comorbid medical conditions that are associated with survival in GBM. Data were collected from medical records of all patients who presented to VCU Medical Center with GBM between January 2005 and February 2015. Patients who underwent surgery/biopsy were considered for inclusion. Cox proportional hazards regression modeling was performed to assess the relationship between survival and sex, race, and comorbid medical conditions. 163 patients met inclusion criteria. Comorbidities associated with survival on individual-characteristic analysis included: history of asthma (Hazard Ratio [HR]: 2.63; 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.24–5.58; p = 0.01), hypercholesterolemia (HR: 1.95; 95% CI: 1.09–3.50; p = 0.02), and incontinence (HR: 2.29; 95% CI: 0.95–5.57; p = 0.07). History of asthma (HR: 2.22; 95% CI: 1.02–4.83; p = 0.04) and hypercholesterolemia (HR: 1.99; 95% CI: 1.11–3.56; p = 0.02) were associated with shorter survival on multivariable analysis. Surgical patients with GBM who had a prior history of asthma or hypercholesterolemia had significantly higher relative risk for mortality on individual-characteristic and multivariable analyses.

Simultaneous miRNA and mRNA transcriptome profiling of glioblastoma samples reveals a novel set of OncomiR candidates and their target genes

Although glioblastomas are common, there remains a need to elucidate the underlying mechanisms behind their initiation and progression and identify molecular pathways for improving treatment. In this study, sixteen fresh-frozen glioblastoma samples and seven samples of healthy brain tissues were analyzed with miRNA and whole transcriptome microarray chips. Candidate miRNAs and mRNAs were selected to validate expression in fifty patient samples in total with the criteria of abundance, relevance and prediction scores. miRNA and target mRNA relationships were assessed by inhibiting selected miRNAs in glioblastoma cells. Functional tests have been conducted in order to see the effects of miRNAs on invasion, migration and apoptosis of GBM cells. Analyses were carried out to determine correlations between selected molecules and clinicopathological features. 1332 genes and 319 miRNAs were found to be dysregulated by the microarrays. The results were combined and analyzed with Transcriptome Analysis Console 3 software and the DAVID online database. Primary differential pathways included Ras, HIF-1, MAPK signaling and cell adhesion. OncomiR candidates 21-5p, 92b-3p, 182-5p and 339-5p for glioblastoma negatively correlated with notable mRNA targets both in tissues and in in vitro experiments. miR-21-5p and miR-339-5p significantly affected migration, invasion and apoptosis of GBM cells in vitro. Significant correlations with overall survival, tumor volume, recurrence and age at diagnosis were discovered. In this article we present valuable integrated microarray analysis of glioblastoma samples regarding miRNA and gene-expression levels. Notable biomarkers and miRNA-mRNA interactions have been identified, some of which correlated with clinicopathological features in our cohort.

Expression of neuronal markers, NFP and GFAP, in malignant astrocytoma

BACKGROUND

Immunohistochemical markers are considered as important factors in diagnosis of malignant astrocytomas. The aim of the current study was to investigate the frequency of the immunohistochemical markers neurofilament protein (NFP) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) in malignant astrocytoma tumors in Firoozgar and Rasool-Akram hospitals from 2005 to 2010.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, immunohistochemical analysis of NFP and GFAP was performed on 79 tissue samples of patients with the diagnosis of anaplastic and glioblastoma multiform (GBM) astrocytomas.

RESULTS

The obtained results demonstrated that all patients were positive for GFAP and only 3.8% were positive for NFP. There was no significant association between these markers and clinical, demographic, and prognostic features of patients (p>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

NFP was expressed only in GBMs and not in anaplastic astrocytomas. It would be crucial to confirm the present findings in a larger number of tumors, especially in high grade gliomas.

Wnt5a, Ryk and Ror2 expression in glioblastoma subgroups

BACKGROUND

Wnt5a, a non-canonical Wnt ligand, has been shown to play tumor-promoting or tumor-suppressive roles in different neoplasms. Increased Wnt5a expression and Wnt5a-dependent invasive activity that is mediated by one of its receptors, Ryk, have been reported in glioblastomas.

METHODS

We investigated the protein expression of Wnt5a, its receptors Ryk and Ror2, and the canonical Wnt pathway marker β-catenin in 186 cases of glioblastoma and its variants. Associations with clinicopathological and molecular variables and prognosis were analyzed.

RESULTS

All glioblastoma cases expressed Wnt5a, Ryk and Ror2 with a different grade. The expression of both Ryk and Ror2 correlated with that of Wnt5a in glioblastomas. The expression of β-catenin did not correlate with any of Wnt5a, Ryk or Ror2. Wnt5a expression was significantly different among subgroups of the glioblastoma. However, none of Wnt5a, Ryk or Ror2 had a prognostic impact on glioblastoma. For β-catenin, a shorter progression-free survival was noted in the glioblastoma with oligodendroglioma component (GBMO) subgroup.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results corroborated previous findings of Ryk-mediated Wnt5a effect, and suggested a role for Ror2 in the Wnt5a machinery in glioblastoma.

Combining intraoperative carmustine wafers and Stupp regimen in multimodal first-line treatment of primary glioblastomas

BACKGROUND

The study investigated if intraoperative use of carmustine wafers, particularly in combination with Stupp regimen, is a viable and safe first-line treatment option of glioblastomas.

METHODS

Eighty-three consecutive adult patients (50 men; mean age 60 years) with newly diagnosed supratentorial primary glioblastomas that underwent surgical resection with intraoperative carmustine wafers implantation (n = 7.1 ± 1.7) were retrospectively studied.

RESULTS

The median overall survival (OS) was 15.8 months with 56 patients dying over the course of the study. There was no significant association between the number of implanted carmustine wafers and complication rates (four surgical site infections, one death). The OS was significantly longer in Stupp regimen patients (19.5 months) as compared with patients with other postoperative treatments (13 months; p = 0.002). In addition patients with eight or more implanted carmustine wafers survived longer (24.5 months) than patients with seven or less implanted wafers (13 months; p = 0.021). Finally, regardless of the number of carmustine wafers, median OS was significantly longer in patients with a subtotal or total resection (21.5 months) than in patients with a partial resection (13 months; p = 0.011).

CONCLUSIONS

The intraoperative use of carmustine wafers in combination with Stupp regimen is a viable first-line treatment option of glioblastomas. The prognostic value of this treatment association should be evaluated in a multicenter trial, ideally in a randomized and placebo-controlled one.

Subclassification of newly diagnosed glioblastomas through an immunohistochemical approach

Molecular signatures in Glioblastoma (GBM) have been described that correlate with clinical outcome and response to therapy. The Proneural (PN) and Mesenchymal (MES) signatures have been identified most consistently, but others including Classical (CLAS) have also been reported. The molecular signatures have been detected by array techniques at RNA and DNA level, but these methods are costly and cannot take into account individual contributions of different cells within a tumor. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate whether subclasses of newly diagnosed GBMs could be assessed and assigned by application of standard pathology laboratory procedures. 123 newly diagnosed GBMs were analyzed for the tumor cell expression of 23 pre-identified proteins and EGFR amplification, together allowing for the subclassification of 65% of the tumors. Immunohistochemistry (IHC)-based profiling was found to be analogous to transcription-based profiling using a 9-gene transcriptional signature for PN and MES subclasses. Based on these data a novel, minimal IHC-based scheme for subclass assignment for GBMs is proposed. Positive staining for IDH1^R132H can be used for PN subclass assignment, high EGFR expression for the CLAS subtype and a combined high expression of PTEN, VIM and/or YKL40 for the MES subclass. The application of the proposed scheme was evaluated in an independent tumor set, which resulted in similar subclass assignment rates as those observed in the training set. The IHC-based subclassification scheme proposed in this study therefore could provide very useful in future studies for stratification of individual patient samples.

Clinical neuropathology practice guide 1-2013: molecular subtyping of glioblastoma: ready for clinical use?

Recently, integrated genomewide analyses have revealed several glioblastoma (GB) subtypes, which differ in terms of key pathogenetic pathways and point to different cells of origin. Even though the proneural and mesenchymal GB signatures evolved as most robust, there is no consensus on the exact number of subtypes and defining criteria. Moreover, important issues concerning within-tumor heterogeneity and class-switching upon recurrence remain to be addressed. Early evidence indicates an association of different GB subtypes with patient outcome and response to therapy, which argues for the implementation of molecular GB subtyping, and consideration of GB subtypes in subsequent patient management. As genome-wide analyses are not routinely available to the majority of neuropathology laboratories, first attempts to implement immunohistochemical testing of surrogate markers are underway. However, so far, confirmatory studies are lacking and there is no consensus on which markers to use. Further, the rationale for testing is compromised from a clinical point of view by a lack of effective therapies for individual GB subtypes. Thus, incorporation of genomic research findings as a basis for GB patient management and clinical decision making currently remains a perspective for the future.