Sphenoid wing meningiomas

Case series of sphenoid wing meningioma - What is a maximal safe resection?

BACKGROUND

Sphenoid wing meningiomas are a challenging surgical disease with relatively high perioperative morbidity. Most studies to date have focused on resection strategies as it relates to disease recurrence. Few have examined the optimal strategy as it relates to overall patient survival. We retrospectively reviewed our case series and evaluated extent of resection and perioperative stroke as it relates to all cause and disease-specific survival.

PATIENTS/METHODS

Ninety-four patients were included in the study. Demographics, clinical features, operative features and clinical course, and time to mortality evaluation were collected. Extent of resection (EOR) was defined as gross total (GTR, 100%), near total (NTR, ≥ 95%), and subtotal (STR,<95%).

RESULTS

The overall mean EOR was 94.5% with 70.2% of cases achieving GTR, 12.8% achieved NTR, and 17% achieved STR. Postoperative stroke only occurred with GTR or NTR (p=0.041). Age alone was significant on Cox regression analysis for all cause mortality (p=0.042, HR 1.054 [95% CI 1.002 - 1.109]). Postoperative stroke was associated with worse disease-specific mortality (p=0.046, HR 23.337 [95% CI 1.052 - 517.782) with no impact from extent of resection (p=0.258).

CONCLUSIONS

Although maximizing resection and minimizing recurrence is ideal, GTR or NTR confer a significantly higher stroke risk. Most patients do not die from their meningioma, as all cause mortality was associated only with age. However, perioperative stroke conferred decreased survival throughout follow up. This series demonstrates that an overly aggressive surgical philosophy negatively impacted disease specific survival.

Lateral sphenoid wing meningiomas without bone invasion-still skull base surgery?

Sphenoid wing meningiomas are generally considered as skull base meningiomas (SBMs). However, given their surgical similarities with non-skull base meningiomas (NSBMs), we hypothesized that lateral sphenoid wing meningiomas (LSWMs) without bone invasion (BI) should be considered as NSBMs. N = 65 LSWMs without BI operated between 1990 to 2010 at a single-center were compared to N = 352 NSBMs, represented by convexity meningiomas (CMs), and to N = 23 SBMs, represented by spheno-orbital meningiomas (SOMs), with respect to baseline demographics, clinical presentations, Simpson grades, complications, adjuvant therapies, as well as overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Only WHO grade I meningiomas were included. No significant differences in baseline demographics, clinical presentation, or pre-operative KPS were found between the three groups. Simpson grade 1-3 was achieved in 90.1% of LSWMs, 97.1% in CMs (p = 0.05), and 82.6% in SOMs (p = 0.23). There were no significant differences in postoperative infection, hematoma, neurological worsening, 30-day mortality, or OS between the three groups. Lower re-treatment rates were observed in LSWMs and CMs compared to SOMs (p = 0.06). With respect to PFS, there was no significant difference between LSWMs and CMs (89.1% and 88.5% at 5 years, respectively), whereas PFS was significantly higher in LSWMs than in SOMs (79% at 5 years) (p = 0.05). LSWMs without BI should be considered as an intermediate entity between NSBMs and SBMs. LSWMs are similar to SOMs with respect to extent of resection, but more similar to CMs with respect to re-treatment rates and PFS.

Combined Extradural and Intradural Pterional Transzygomatic Approach to Large Sphenoid Wing Meningiomas. Operative Technique and Surgical Results

Objectives  Describe a unique and safe surgical procedure for the microsurgical management of large sphenoid wing meningiomas (SWMs) aimed to a radical resection of these tumors. Design  A prospective series of 26 cases with SWMs larger than 3 cm in one of its main diameter is presented. All patients were studied following the same clinical and imaging procedures. The surgical approach was through a pterional transzygomatic craniotomy. The surgical procedure has the following steps: 1. Extradural tumor devascularization and resection of the hyperostotic and/or infiltrated bone and then intradurally; 2. Intradural tumor debunking; 3. Microdissection of vascular branches and perforators from the capsule; 4. Identification of the optic and oculomotor nerves and internal carotid artery; 5. Tumor capsule dissection and resection; 6. Dural resection or cauterization; 7. Dural and bone reconstruction and closing. Results  All lesions were completely removed. Most complications were transient. The most relevant complication was a large middle cerebral artery infarct with permanent hemiplegia despite a decompressive craniotomy. Conclusion  Large SWMs can be considered as a single pathology regarding the surgical approach and intraoperative microsurgical procedure strategies. The pterional transzygomatic approach allows an extradural devascularization of the tumor and an extensive bone resection that facilitates the intradural stage of tumor resection. The proposed approach allows a wide and radical resection of the duramater and bone that increases the Simpson grade. However, surgery does not control other biological or molecular prognostic factors involved in tumor recurrence.