The marionette technique for treatment of isolated fourth ventricle: technical note

Endoscopic antegrade aqueductoplasty and stenting with panventricular catheter in management of trapped fourth ventricle in patients with inadequately functioning supratentorial shunt

Background:

Trapped fourth ventricle (TFV) usually develops as a complication of supratentorial ventricular CSF shunting, especially when hydrocephalus is caused by intraventricular hemorrhage and/or infection. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of endoscopic aqueduct stenting using a single refashioned shunt tube to treat cases presenting with both TFV and shunt malfunction.

Methods:

We retrospectively collected and analyzed data from patients presenting with TFV and supratentorial shunt malfunction who underwent endoscopic aqueduct stenting using a refashioned shunt tube. All cases were treated at our institution between January 2010 and July 2019. The surgical technique is described.

Results:

Eighteen patients were enrolled in our study. There were ten males and eight females. The mean age was 11.2 years (range = 1–33 years). Headache, nausea, and vomiting were the most common clinical presentations. The mean duration of follow-up was 22.1 months (range = 6–60 months). All cases showed clinical and radiological improvement after surgery.

Conclusion:

Endoscopic antegrade aqueductoplasty and stenting with the refashioned panventricular shunt catheter are an adequate treatment option for both TFV and supratentorial shunt malfuncion.

Predictors of Outcome Following Cerebral Aqueductoplasty: An Individual Participant Data Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The evidence supporting the efficacy and safety of cerebral aqueductoplasty (CA) is limited to small surgical series.

OBJECTIVE

To perform an individual participant data meta-analysis to determine the efficacy and safety of CA and to determine the effect of patient's age, etiology, surgical approach, and use of stent on success.

METHODS

Electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL) were searched with no language or date restrictions to identify cohort studies of consecutive participants undergoing CA (without concomitant endoscopic third ventriculostomy or cerebrospinal fluid [CSF] shunt) that reported outcome. Outcome was defined as the time elapsed from the index operation until a second procedure was performed for CSF diversion.

RESULTS

Of 146 citations, 14 articles reporting on 137 participants were eligible. One hundred three participants (75%) did not require a second CSF diversion procedure. The mean duration until repeat CSF diversion procedure was 121.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 102.2-141.0). In multivariate analysis, older age at surgery (hazard ratio [HR], 0.43; 95% CI, 0.21-0.88; P = .020), congenital etiology (HR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.04-0.85; P = .030), and use of stent (HR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.13-0.70; P = .006) were independent predictors of good outcome. Morbidity, mainly ophthalmoparesis and hemorrhage, was experienced in 22% of participants.

CONCLUSION

Small retrospective cohort studies are inherently prone to biases, some of which are overcome through the use of individual participant data. The best available evidence suggests that CA is an effective procedure with a moderate morbidity profile. Older age at surgery, congenital etiology, and use of stent predict a good outcome with respect to delaying the requirement for a second CSF diversion procedure.