Left-right axial rotation within C1–2 after implant removal

Dynamics of atlantoaxial rotation related to age and sex: a cross-sectional study of 308 subjects

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Physiological ranges and dynamic changes of atlantoaxial rotation (ROTC1/2), total cervical spine rotation (ROTCs) and the percentage of ROTC1/2 from ROTCs (ROTCperc) for different age groups have not yet been investigated in a sufficiently sized cohort. Furthermore, it is not clear whether demographic variables such a sex, smoking status or diabetes affect ROTC1/2, ROTCs and ROTCperc.

PURPOSE

Obtain physiological ranges of ROTC1/2, ROTCs and ROTCperc for different age groups and determine their age-based dynamics. Investigate whether ROTC1/2, ROTCs and ROTCperc are affected by sex, smoking status or diabetes.

DESIGN

Observational cross-sectional study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Patients undergoing elective CT examinations of the head and neck region between August 2020 and January 2022.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Ranges of motion of ROTC1/2, ROTCs and ROTCperc in degrees.

METHODS

A total of 308 subjects underwent dynamic rotational CT examinations of the upper cervical spine. Patients were divided into three age categories A1 (27-49 years), A2 (50-69 years) and A3 (≥70 years). Category A3 was further divided into B1 (70-79 years) and B2 (≥80 years). Values of ROTC1/2, ROTCs and ROTCperc were compared between all age groups, males and females, smokers and nonsmokers, diabetics a nondiabetics. Dynamics of ROTC1/2, ROTCs related to age and sex were visualized using scatterplot and trendline models.

RESULTS

ROTC1/2 significantly decreased from group A1 (64.4°) to B2 (46.7°) as did ROTCs from A1 (131.2°) to B2 (97.6°). No significant differences of ROTperc were found between groups A1-B2 with values oscillating between 49% and 51%. Smoking and diabetes did not significantly affect ROTC1/2, ROTCs and ROTCperc, females had significantly higher ROTCs than males. Males and females demonstrated a different dynamic of ROTC1/2 and ROTCs demonstrated by out scatterplot and trendline models.

CONCLUSIONS

Both ROTC1/2 and ROTCs significantly decrease with age, whereas ROTCperc remains stable. Females demonstrated higher ROTCs and their decrease of ROTC1/2 and ROTCs occurred in higher age groups compared to males. The functional repercussions atlantoaxial fusion are variable based on patient age and sex and should be taken into account prior to surgery.

Management of fresh odontoid fractures using posterior C1-2 fixation without fusion: a long-term clinical follow-up study

OBJECTIVE

Posterior C1-2 fixation without fusion makes it possible to restore atlantoaxial motion after removing the implant, and it has been used as an alternative technique for odontoid fractures; however, the long-term efficacy of this technique remains uncertain. The purpose of the present study was to explore the long-term follow-up outcomes of patients with odontoid fractures who underwent posterior C1-2 fixation without fusion.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed on 62 patients with type II/III fresh odontoid fractures who underwent posterior C1-2 fixation without fusion and were followed up for more than 5 years. The patients were divided into group A (23 patients with implant removal) and group B (39 patients without implant removal) based on whether they underwent a second surgery to remove the implant. The clinical outcomes were recorded and compared between the two groups. In group A, the range of motion (ROM) of C1-2 was calculated, and correlation analysis was performed to explore the factors that influence the ROM of C1-2.

RESULTS

A solid fracture fusion was found in all patients. At the final follow-up, no significant difference was found in visual analog scale score or American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale score between the two groups (p > 0.05), but patients in group A had a lower Neck Disability Index score and milder neck stiffness than did patients in group B (p < 0.05). In group A, 87.0% (20/23) of the patients had atlantoodontoid joint osteoarthritis at the final follow-up. In group A, the C1-2 ROM in rotation was 6.1° ± 4.5° at the final follow-up, whereas the C1-2 ROM in flexion-extension was 1.8° ± 1.2°. A negative correlation was found between the C1-2 ROM in rotation and the severity of tissue injury in the atlantoaxial region (r = -0.403, p = 0.024) and the degeneration of the atlantoodontoid joint (r = -0.586, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Posterior C1-2 fixation without fusion can be used effectively for the management of fresh odontoid fractures. The removal of the implant can further improve the clinical efficacy, but satisfactory atlantoaxial motion cannot be maintained for a long time after implant removal. A surgeon should reconsider the contribution of posterior C1-2 fixation without fusion and secondary implant removal in preserving atlantoaxial mobility for patients with fresh odontoid fractures.

[Early intraoperative and postoperative complications of C1-C2 fixation using the Goel-Harms technique : How often? Which? Why?]

Fractures of the axis are among the most frequent spinal injuries. Posterior C1-C2 fixation according to Goel-Harms is an accepted alternative to the more traditional procedures: initial stability has been shown and there is a wide range of indications but there is a paucity of data on possible complications. Such knowledge, however, is essential in order to improve outcomes.Thus, the aim of the study was:1. to describe the frequency, type and severity of early postoperative complications following C1-C2 fixation according to Goel-Harms,2. to investigate whether there is a correlation between frequency and severity of complications,3. to detect risk factors for complications.Patients included in this study were treated surgically using the C1-C2 fixation according to Goel-Harms between March 2011 and July 2018. Data were taken from our hospital database and checked via OPS 10 code "S12.1". We analyzed age, sex, ASA score, blood loss, operating time and complications. These data were extracted from clinical data sheets.A total of 134 patients were detected, 54% female, mean age 75 years and mean ASA score 3. There were 122 complications. All these complications were observed in 50% of the patients. These were mainly minor complications (32%), and 18% severe complications. Mortality was 2%. We found that patients with more severe complications also had significantly more complications when compared to patients with minor complications (Fisher's exact test, p = 0.001). Preoperative ASA score was the only risk factor to significantly influence the number (p = 0.001) and severity (p = 0.002) of postoperative complications. Each increase of the preoperative ASA score increased the risk to get one more complication by a factor of 2.55 (odds ratio 2.55) and increased the risk to get a severe complication by a factor of 2.43 (odds ratio 2.43). Intraoperative blood loss, patient age and duration of surgery, however, were not identified as risk factors for complications.

The Feasibility of C1-C2 Screw-rod Fixation in the Children 5 Years of Age and Younger

BACKGROUND

Atlantoaxial fixation is technically challenging in younger children. The C1-C2 screw-rod fixation technique is established for adults but limited data about the clinical and radiographical outcome for the treatment of children with 5 years of age or younger is available.

METHODS

All files of children who were consecutively treated for spinal disorders were reviewed. Inclusion criteria for further evaluation were: 0 to 5 years of age at initial procedure; detailed surgical report of a posterior C1-C2 fusion with mass lateral and pedicle screw-rod fixation as described by Harms; a minimum clinical and radiographical follow-up of 24 months. The postoperative and last follow-up computed tomography scan and radiographs were used to assess the positioning and stability of the C1-C2 screw-rod construct.

RESULTS

Eleven patients (3 boys) with a mean age of 46 months (range: 8 to 66 mo) fulfilled inclusion criteria and were evaluated retrospectively. The mean clinical and radiographical follow-up was 79 months (range: 24 mo to 170 mo). The diagnosis was atlantoaxial rotatory dislocation (4 cases), C1-C2 instability with subluxation (3 cases), atlantoaxial dislocation and os odontoideum (1 case), type II odontoid fracture (1 case), traumatic odontoid epiphysiolysis (1 case), and traumatic rupture of the transverse ligament with C1 subluxation (1 case). Intraoperatively and postoperatively no new neurovascular or vascular complication occurred. C1 lateral mass screws were placed correctly in all cases. Twenty-two C2 pedicle screws were placed correctly (85.7%), and 3 screws showed penetration of the pedicle wall (14.3%). No implant revision, implant failure, and pseudarthrosis were noted. Loss of correction was noted in 1 patient with unilateral C1-C2 fixation and a repeated dorsal fusion procedures were performed. A repeat procedure for implant removal and segmental release was performed in 3 patients to increase the axial rotation of the head.

CONCLUSIONS

The C1-C2 screw-rod fixation is a safe technique that achieves solid fixation of the atlantoaxial complex in young children with various disorders. The technique preserves the joint and allows for segmental release via implant removal.

Atlantoaxial Rotatory Dislocation: Delayed Diagnose Will Result in More Invasive Treatment Options

Purpose The atlantoaxial joint represents the most mobile joint complex within the spine, secured by ligaments and capsules. Integrity of the atlantoaxial joint is crucial with respect to the mobility of the head and the upper spine. Atlantoaxial rotatory dislocation is the most common type of injury within this joint in children and is characterized by a typical position of the head (cock robin position). Nevertheless, this type of injury is frequently overlooked. The purpose of the current study was threefold. First, the characteristics of the patients with atlantoaxial dislocation were identified. Next, we checked if the time to treatment did influence the type of treatment. Finally, we checked if the age of the child at the time of treatment influenced the type of treatment.

Methods Forty-four children, who were treated consecutively due to atlantoaxial dislocation at a single spine center between September 1993 and October 2018, are analyzed retrospectively regarding age, sex, symptoms, etiology, time to diagnosis, time to treatment, and outcome.

Results Forty-four children (30 girls, mean age 8.9 years) were included in the study. The cock robin head position was found in all of them, but neurological deficits were not found in any of them. In 21 patients, dislocation was caused by previous infection (Grisel's syndrome), whereas in 19 patients, dislocation was due to minor trauma. In 4 cases, etiology remained unknown. Mean time to sufficient treatment was 178 days. Eighteen patients received closed reduction and immobilization after 57 days at mean. Open reduction followed by temporary fixation was done in 12 patients after a mean time gap of 188 days. Bony atlantoaxial fusion was necessary in 14 children, who were diagnosed after 319 days on average. Invasiveness of treatment was dependent on the time delay between development of dislocation and treatment; a significant difference was found between invasiveness of treatment and time to treatment (Kruskal–Wallis test, p < 0,05). Moreover, older children were treated significantly more often with fusion than younger ones (χ 2, p = 0,002).

Conclusion Young girls are predisposed to incur an atlantoaxial rotatory dislocation, which usually occurs due to minor trauma or infection. The cock robin position is characteristic, but neurological deficits are not common. There is a need for early and sufficient treatment because delayed treatment necessitates more invasive treatment, thus leading to a complete loss of function of the most mobile joint within the spine. Finally, older children are predisposed to more invasive treatment strategies.

Comparison of Atlantoaxial Rotation and Functional Outcomes of Two Nonfusion Techniques in the Treatment of Anderson-D'Alonzo Type II Odontoid Fractures

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective comparative study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of anterior screw fixation and posterior temporary-fixation in the treatment of Anderson-D'Alonzo type II odontoid fractures.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Posterior C1-C2 temporary-fixation can spare the motion of C1-C2 in the treatment of odontoid fractures. However, it is unknown whether it can achieve the same outcomes as anterior screw fixation.

METHODS

Data of 20 patients who underwent posterior temporary-fixation due to Anderson-D'Alonzo type II odontoid fractures with intact transverse ligament were retrospectively reviewed. Another 20 patients undergoing anterior screw fixation were randomly selected as the control group. The range of motion (ROM) in rotation of C1-C2 measured on functional computed tomography (CT) scan and outcomes evaluated by the visual analog scale (VAS) for neck pain, neck stiffness, patient satisfaction, and neck disability index (NDI) were compared between two groups at the final follow-up.

RESULTS

At the final follow-up, 19 cases in each groups achieved facture healing. Total C1-C2 ROM in rotation on both sides in the posterior temporary-fixation group was 32.4 ± 12.5°, smaller than 40.0 ± 13.0 in the anterior fixation group. However, there was no statistical difference between two groups. And there was no significant difference between two groups in functional outcomes evaluated by VAS for neck pain, neck stiffness, patient satisfaction, and NDI.

CONCLUSION

Posterior temporary-fixation can spare the motion of C1-C2 and achieve same good clinical outcomes as anterior screw fixation in the treatment of Anderson-D'Alonzo type II odontoid fractures. It was an ideal alternative strategy to anterior screw fixation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.