Accuracy of intraoperative computed tomography image-guided surgery in placing pedicle and pelvic screws for primary versus revision spine surgery

Top 25 Most Cited Articles on Intraoperative Computer Tomography-Guided Navigation in Spine Surgery

BACKGROUND

In recent years, the use of intraoperative computer tomography-guided (CT-guided) navigation has gained significant popularity among health care providers who perform minimally invasive spine surgery. This review aims to identify and analyze trends in the literature related to the widespread adoption of CT-guided navigation in spine surgery, emphasizing the shift from conventional fluoroscopy-based techniques to CT-guided navigation.

METHODS

Articles pertaining to this study were identified via a database review and were hierarchically organized based on the number of citations. An "advanced document search" was performed on September 28th, 2022, utilizing Boolean search operator terms. The 25 most referenced articles were combined into a primary list after sorting results in descending order based on the total number of citations.

RESULTS

The "Top 25" list for intraoperative CT-guided navigation in spine surgery cumulatively received a total of 2742 citations, with an average of 12 new citations annually. The number of citations ranged from 246 for the most cited article to 60 for the 25th most cited article. The most cited article was a paper by Siewerdsen et al., with 246 total citations, averaging 15 new citations per year.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative CT-guided navigation is 1 of many technological advances that is used to increase surgical accuracy, and it has become an increasingly popular alternative to conventional fluoroscopy-based techniques. Given the increasing adoption of intraoperative CT-guided navigation in spine surgery, this review provides impactful evidence for its utility in spine surgery.

A new technique useful for lumbosacral percutaneous pedicle screw placement without fluoroscopy or computer-aided navigation systems

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) placements in the lumbosacral spine generally rely on fluoroscopy at the expense of radiation exposure. Our accumulated experience in open PS placements without fluoroscopic guidance realized a consistent shift toward PPS insertion with newly developed devices, which require neither fluoroscopy nor navigation. We wish to report our new technique and evaluations of its accuracy.

METHODS

Our equipment consisted of a pedicle targeting tool to identify and escort the cannulated awl to the correct starting point for cortical bone perforation and a cannulated awl-probe system with a guidewire to maintain the optimal position throughout the subsequent surgical steps. The surgeon could advance the blunt-tipped probe searching for the cancellous bone track using tactile feedback as experienced in open techniques. A 2-year period of transition from a free-hand (1169 screws in 286 patients) to the new PPS technique (1933 screws in 413 patients) allowed accuracy comparison between the two procedures using postoperative CT scans.

RESULTS

Compared with the open-group, the PPS-group showed a lower rate of fully contained intrapedicular PS placements at L1 through S1, as a whole (90.7% vs 85.4%), but not at L4 through S1 (89.9% vs 90.2%). Less-accurate PPS placements at upper than lower lumbar spines in part reflect intended pedicle perforations laterally as a trade-off for avoiding facet violation immediately above the most cephalad screw. The PPS-group also had a higher incidence of PS-related transient nerve root complications (0% vs 1.7%). These values for the PPS-group, however, fell within those previously reported for free-hand or fluoroscopy techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

Our new PPS technique, although useful for eliminating the potential risk of repeated radiation exposure, fell short of reaching the accuracy of the free-hand technique. Nerve integrity monitoring with PS stimulation, which we currently use, will help further improve the technical precision.

STUDY DESIGN

Original Article. The study was approved by our institutional review boad (2,019,231).

High Accuracy and Safety of Intraoperative CT-Guided Navigation for Transpedicular Screw Placement in Revision Spinal Surgery

Background: Intraoperative CT-guided navigation (iCT-navigation) has been reported to improve the accuracy and safety of transpedicular screw placement in primary spinal surgery. However, due to a disrupted bony anatomy and scarring tissue, revision spinal surgery can be challenging. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and safety of iCT-navigation for screw placement at the virgin site versus the revision site in revision thoracolumbar spinal surgery. Method: In total, 254 screws were inserted in 27 revision surgeries, in which 114 (44.9%) screws were inserted at the site with previous laminectomy or posterolateral fusion (the revision site), 64 (25.2%) were inserted at the virgin site, and 76 (29.9%) were inserted to replace the pre-existing screws. CT scans were conducted for each patient after all screws were inserted to intraoperatively confirm the screw accuracy. Results: In total, 248 (97.6%) screws were considered accepted. The rate of accepted screws at the virgin site was 98.4% (63/64) versus 95.6% (109/114) at the revision site (p: 0.422). There were six (2.4%) unaccepted screws, which were immediately revised during the same operation. There was no neurological injury noted in our patients. Conclusion: With the use of iCT-navigation, the rate of accepted screws at the revision site was found to be comparable to that at the virgin site. We concluded that iCT-navigation could achieve high accuracy and safety for transpedicular screw placement in revision spinal surgery and allow for the immediate revision of unaccepted screws.

Navigation Techniques in Endoscopic Spine Surgery

Endoscopic spine surgery (ESS) advances the principles of minimally invasive surgery, including minor collateral tissue damage, reduced blood loss, and faster recovery times. ESS allows for direct access to the spine through small incisions and direct visualization of spinal pathology via an endoscope. While this technique has many applications, there is a steep learning curve when adopting ESS into a surgeon's practice. Two types of navigation, optical and electromagnetic, may allow for widespread utilization of ESS by engendering improved orientation to surgical anatomy and reduced complication rates. The present review discusses these two available navigation technologies and their application in endoscopic procedures by providing case examples. Furthermore, we report on the future directions of navigation within the discipline of ESS.

Pedicle Screw Placement Using Intraoperative Computed Tomography and Computer-Aided Spinal Navigation Improves Screw Accuracy and Avoids Postoperative Revisions: Single-Center Analysis of 1400 Pedicle Screws

OBJECTIVE

Intraoperative computed tomography and navigation (iCT-Nav) is increasingly used to aid spinal instrumentation. We aimed to document the accuracy and revision rate of pedicle screw placement across many screws placed using iCT-Nav. We also assess patient-level factors predictive of high-grade pedicle breach.

METHODS

Medical records of patients who underwent iCT-Nav pedicle screw placement between 2015 and 2017 at a single center were retrospectively reviewed. Screw placement accuracy was individually assessed for each screw using the 2-mm incremental grading system for pedicle breach. Predictors of high-grade (>2 mm) breach were identified using multiple logistic regression.

RESULTS

In total, 1400 pedicle screws were placed in 208 patients undergoing cervicothoracic (29; 13.9%), thoracic (30; 14.4), thoracolumbar (19; 9.1%) and lumbar (130; 62.5%) surgeries. iCT-Nav afforded high-accuracy screw placement, with 1356 of 1400 screws (96.9%) being placed accurately. In total, 37 pedicle screws (2.64%) were revised intraoperatively during the index surgery across 31 patients, with no subsequent returns to the operating room because of screw malpositioning. After correcting for potential confounders, males were less likely to have a high-grade breach (odds ratio [OR] 0.21; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.10-0.59, P = 0.003) whereas lateral (OR 6.21; 95% CI 2.47-15.52, P < 0.001) or anterior (OR 5.79; 95% CI2.11-15.88, P = 0.001) breach location were predictive of a high-grade breach.

CONCLUSIONS

iCT-Nav with postinstrumentation intraoperative imaging is associated with a reduced need for costly postoperative return to the operating room for screw revision. In comparison with studies of navigation without iCT where 1.5%-1.7% of patients returned for a second surgery, we report 0 revision surgeries due to screw malpositioning.

Posterior First and Second Cervical Vertebrae Fusion by Screw Fixation Technique using the Modern Pre-fabricated Template Method on Cadaver Samples

Introduction

C1 lateral mass and C2 pedicular screws insertion are used for C1-C2 posterior fusion. Fluoroscopy Guided technique is routinely used for screw placement but it is associated with risk of injury to spinal cord and vertebral artery. 3D printing has developed rapidly in the fields of medicine. It is helpful in improving precise treatment and used for instrumentation in spine. We want to evaluate the accuracy of C1 lateral mass screws and C2 pedicle screws insertion by Pre-Fabricated Template made by three-dimensional (3D) printing.

Materials and methods

Five cervical samples were obtained from cadavers. Based on fine-cut CT scan 3D-images reconstructed and the path of the screws designed by special software. A template produced by 3D-printer from 3D images. After printing the templates, they were fixed on the relevant vertebra in the operation room and based on the template path, C1 lateral mass screw and C2 pedicular screws were inserted. Placement of the screws was evaluated using CT scans post-operatively.

Results

A total of 14 screws were inserted by above-mentioned method. After evaluation with CT scans none of the screws were entered in the spinal canal. Two screws had vertebral artery canal perforation with less than 50% breach. Violation was judged as noncritical and would probably not have resulted in injury to vertebral artery.

Conclusions

The accuracy of C1 lateral mass screw and C2 pedicle screw insertion is acceptable with pre-fabricated template and can provide a useful aid for screw placement.

Clinical application of intraoperative O-arm navigation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Inaccurate fixation and positioning of the glenoid component using conventional techniques are problematic in reversed shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). Our objective was to investigate the accuracy of O-arm navigation of the glenoid component in RSA.

METHODS

This retrospective case-control study comprised 2 groups of 25 patients who underwent reversed shoulder arthroplasty with or without intraoperative O-arm navigation. The intraoperative goal was to place the component neutrally in the glenoid in the axial plane and 10° inferiorly tilted in the scapular plane. Glenoid version angle and inclination were measured by computed tomography obtained preoperatively and a year postoperatively. Operative time, intraoperative bleeding, and the presence of postoperative complications were recorded.

RESULTS

Compared with the ideal, the range of error for version was 7.3° (SD 3.6°) in the control group and 5.6° (SD 3.6°) in the navigated group (P = 0.278), and the range of error for inclination was 18.3° (SD 11.7°) in the control group and 4.9° (SD 3.8°) in the navigated group (P = 0.0004). The mean operative time was 164.6 (SD 21.2) min in the control group and 192.0 (SD 16.2) min in the navigated group (P = 0.001). The mean intraoperative bleeding was 201.0 (SD 37.0) mL in the control group and 185.3 (SD 35.6) mL in the navigated group (P = 0.300). There were no complications reported related to the intraoperative O-arm navigation.

CONCLUSION

O-arm navigation may be a useful tool for the placement with inferior tilt of the glenoid procedure in reversed shoulder arthroplasty.

Anterolateral S1 screw malposition detected with intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during posterior lumbosacral fusion

Background:

The standard of care is to utilize intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IOM) of triggered electromyography (tEMG) during posterior lumbosacral instrumented-fusion surgery. IOM should theoretically signal misplacement of S1 screws into the neural L5–S1 foramen or spinal canal, utilizing screw stimulation, and recording of the lower limb muscles and the anal sphincter. Here, we evaluated when and whether anterolateral S1 screw malposition could be detected by IOM/tEMG during open posterior lumbosacral instrumented fusion surgery.

Methods:

tEMG, somatosensory-evoked potential (SSEP), and transcranial electrical motor-evoked potential (TcMEP) data were retrospectively reviewed from 2015 to 2017 during open posterior lumbosacral instrumented fusions. We utilized screw stimulation alert thresholds of <14 mA (tEMG) and recorded from the lower extremity muscles and anal sphincter. Furthermore, all patients underwent routine postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans to confirm the screw location.

Results:

There were 106 S1 screws placed in 54 patients: 52 bilateral and 2 unilateral. In 6 patients (11.1%), 7 screws (6.6%) registered at low tEMG thresholds. In 1 patient, the postoperative CT scan documented external malposition of the screw despite no intraoperative IOM/tEMG alert. When S1 misplaced screws were stimulated, the most sensitive muscle was the tibialis anterior; the sensitivity of the IOM/tEMG was 87.5%, the specificity was 97.9%, the positive predictive value was 77.8%, and the negative predictive value was 98.9%. TcMEP and SSEP did not change during any of the operations. Notably, no patient developed a new neurological deficit.

Conclusion:

Anterolateral S1 screw malposition can be detected accurately utilizing IOM/tEMG stimulation of screws. When alerts occur, they can largely be corrected by partially backing out the screw (e.g., a few turns) and/ or changing the screw trajectory.

Treatment of L5-S1 Spondyloptosis with Multiple Pedicle Defects Through a Combined Anterior and Posterior Approach

BACKGROUND

An anterior dislocation of the L5 vertebral body from the sacrum and decent into the pelvis is considered as spondyloptosis. The surgical treatment of L5-S1 spondyloptosis remains challenging and controversial. We present a case of lumbosacral spondyloptosis with multiple pedicle defects treated through a combined anterior and posterior approach.

CASE DESCRIPTION

A 38-year-old female patient suffering from L5-S1 spondyloptosis with multiple pedicle defects without any history of trauma presented with lower back pain and bilateral lower leg radiating pain. A 3-stage procedure involving L5 spondylectomy, assisted by intraoperative 3-dimensional (3D) navigation, through a retroperitoneal approach at the first stage was performed. At the second stage, decompression was performed, and pedicle screws and iliac screws were placed into L1-S2, which was assisted by intraoperative 3D navigation. At the third stage, slippage reduction was achieved by placing L4 over onto S1, where a mesh was stuffed with bone from the spondylectomy and was placed into the L4/S1 intervertebral space. The patient experienced transient lower leg weakness but returned to preoperative status soon. Radiography revealed that internal fixation was in good position. No dural tears, postoperative infections, and implantation failure were reported after 3 months of postoperation.

CONCLUSIONS

The L5 spondylectomy shortens the spine to reduce the strain on the neural elements and facilitates correction of the lumbosacral kyphosis. When long instrumentation is mandatory, such as in multiple pedicle defects, sacropelvic fixation is recommended. Intraoperative 3D navigation is helpful in such a complex case.

Accuracy Analysis of Iliac Screw Using Freehand Technique in Spinal Surgery : Relation between Screw Breach and Revision Surgery

Objective

To analyze the accuracy of iliac screws using freehand technique performed by the same surgeon. We also analyzed how the breach of iliac screws was related to the clinical symptoms resulting in revision surgery.

Methods

From January 2009 to November 2015, 100 patients (193 iliac screws) were analyzed using postoperative computed tomography scans. The breaches were classified based on the superior, inferior, lateral, and medial iliac wall violation by the screw. According to the length of screw extrusion, the classification grades were as follows : grade 1, screw extrusion <1 cm; grade II, 1 cm ≤ screw extrusion <2 cm; grade III, 2 cm ≤ screw extrusion <3 cm; and grade IV, 3 cm ≤ screw extrusion. We also reviewed the revision surgery associated with iliac screw misplacement.

Results

Of the 193 inserted screws, 169 were correctly located and 24 were misplaced screws. There were eight grade I, six grade II, six grade III, and four grade IV screw breaches, and 11, 8, 2, and 3 screws violated the medial, lateral, superior, and inferior walls, respectively. Four revision surgeries were performed for the grade III or IV iliac screw breaches in the lateral or inferior direction with respect to its related symptoms.

Conclusion

In iliac screw placement, 12.4% breaches developed. Although most breaches were not problematic, symptomatic violations (2.1%) could result in revision surgery. Notably, the surgeon should keep in mind that lateral or inferior wall breaches longer than 2 cm can be risky and should be avoided.

Accurate placement of cervical pedicle screws using 3D-printed navigational templates : An improved technique with continuous image registration

OBJECTIVE

Accurate placement of cervical pedicle screws remains a surgical challenge. This study aimed to test the feasibility of using a novel three-dimensional (3D-)printed navigational template to overcome this challenge.

METHODS

Cervical spines were scanned using computed tomography (CT). A 3D model of the cervical spines was created. The screw trajectory was designed to pass through the central axis of the pedicle. Thereafter, a navigational template was designed by removing the soft tissue from the bony surface in the 3D model. A 3D printer was used to print the navigational template. The screws were then placed in the cadavers following CT scanning. The 3D model of the designed trajectory and the placed screws were registered. The coordinates of the entry and exit points of the designed trajectory and the actual trajectory were recorded. The numbers of qualified points that met the different degrees of accuracy were compared using a χ² test.

RESULTS

A total of 158 screws were placed. Five screws breached the pedicle cortex with a distance <2 mm. There was no significant difference between the pre- and postoperative entry points with a degree of accuracy ≥1.7 mm (P = 0.131). Meanwhile, there was no significant difference between the pre- and postoperative exit points with degrees of accuracy ≥6.4 mm (P = 0.071).

CONCLUSION

A navigational template can be designed by removing the soft tissue from the bony surface in a CT-generated 3D model. This guiding tool may effectively prevent intraoperative drifting and accurately places cervical pedicle screws.

Percutaneous screw placement in the lumbar spine with a modified guidance technique based on 3D CT navigation system

Several guidance techniques have been employed to increase accuracy and reduce surgical time during percutaneous placement of pedicle screws (PS). The purpose of our study was to present a modified technique for percutaneous placement of lumbar PS that reduces surgical time. We reviewed 23 cases of percutaneous PS placement using our technique for minimally invasive lumbar surgeries and 24 control cases where lumbar PS placement was done via common technique using Jamshidi needles (Becton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). An integrated computer-guided navigation system was used in all cases. In the technique modification, a handheld drill with a navigated guide was used to create the path for inserting guidewires through the pedicles and into the vertebral bodies. After drill removal, placement of the guidewires through the pedicles took place. The PS were implanted over the guidewires, through the pedicles and into the vertebral bodies. Intraoperative computed tomography was performed after screw placement to ensure optimal positioning in all cases. There were no intraoperative complications with either technique. PS placement was correct in all cases. The average time for each PS placement was 6.9 minutes for the modified technique and 9.2 minutes for the common technique. There was no significant difference in blood loss. In conclusion, this modified technique is efficient and contributes to reduced operative time.

Accuracy of screw fixation using the O-arm® and StealthStation® navigation system for unstable pelvic ring fractures

PURPOSE

Screw fixation for unstable pelvic ring fractures is generally performed using the C-arm. However, some studies reported erroneous piercing with screws, nerve injuries, and vessel injuries. Recent studies have reported the efficacy of screw fixations using navigation systems. The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate the accuracy of screw fixation using the O-arm^® imaging system and StealthStation^® navigation system for unstable pelvic ring fractures.

METHODS

The participants were 10 patients with unstable pelvic ring fractures, who underwent screw fixations using the O-arm StealthStation navigation system (nine cases with iliosacral screw and one case with lateral compression screw). We investigated operation duration, bleeding during operation, the presence of complications during operation, and the presence of cortical bone perforation by the screws based on postoperative CT scan images. We also measured the difference in screw tip positions between intraoperative navigation screen shot images and postoperative CT scan images.

RESULTS

The average operation duration was 71 min, average bleeding was 12 ml, and there were no nerve or vessel injuries during the operation. There was no cortical bone perforation by the screws. The average difference between intraoperative navigation images and postoperative CT images was 2.5 ± 0.9 mm, for all 18 screws used in this study.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that the O-arm StealthStation navigation system provides accurate screw fixation for unstable pelvic ring fractures.

Differences between Manufacturers of Computed Tomography-Based Computer-Assisted Surgery Systems Do Exist: A Systematic Literature Review

STUDY DESIGN

Literature review.

OBJECTIVE

Several studies have shown that the accuracy of pedicle screw placement significantly improves with use of computed tomography (CT)-based navigation systems. Yet, there has been no systematic review directly comparing accuracy of pedicle screw placement between different CT-based navigation systems. The objective of this study is to review the results presented in the literature and compare CT-based navigation systems relative only to screw placement accuracy.

METHODS

Data sources included CENTRAL, Medline, PubMed, and Embase databases. Studies included were randomized clinical trials, case series, and case-control trials reporting the accuracy of pedicle screws placement using CT-based navigation. Two independent reviewers extracted the data from the selected studies that met our inclusion criteria. Publications were grouped based on the CT-based navigation system used for pedicle screw placement.

RESULTS

Of the 997 articles we screened, only 26 met all of our inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis, which showed a significant statistical difference (p < 0.0001, 95% confidence interval 0.92 to 1.23) in accuracy of pedicle screw placement between three different CT-based navigation systems. The mean (weighted) accuracy of pedicle screws placement based on the CT-based navigation system was found to be 97.20 ± 2.1% in StealthStation (Medtronic, United States) and 96.1 ± 3.9% in VectorVision (BrainLab, Germany).

CONCLUSION

This review summarizes results presented in the literature and compares screw placement accuracy using different CT-based navigation systems. Although certain factors such as the extent of the procedure and the experience and skills of the surgeon were not accounted for, the differences in accuracy demonstrated should be considered by spine surgeons and should be validated for effects on patients' outcome.

Reliability of the Planned Pedicle Screw Trajectory versus the Actual Pedicle Screw Trajectory using Intra-operative 3D CT and Image Guidance

BACKGROUND

Technological advances, including navigation, have been made to improve safety and accuracy of pedicle screw fixation. We evaluated the accuracy of the virtual screw placement (Stealth projection) compared to actual screw placement (intra-operative O-Arm) and examined for differences based on the distance from the reference frame.

METHODS

A retrospective evaluation of prospectively collected data was conducted from January 2013 to September 2013. We evaluated thoracic and lumbosacral pedicle screws placed using intraoperative O-arm and Stealth navigation by obtaining virtual screw projections and intraoperative O-arm images after screw placement. The screw trajectory angle to the midsagittal line and superior endplate was compared in the axial and sagittal views, respectively. Percent error and paired t-test statistics were then performed.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients with 240 pedicle screws were analyzed. The mean angular difference between the virtual and actual image in all screws was 2.17° ± 2.20° on axial images and 2.16° ± 2.24° on sagittal images. There was excellent agreement between actual and virtual pedicle screw trajectories in the axial and sagittal plane with ICC = 0.99 (95%CI: 0.992-0.995) (p<0.001) and ICC= 0.81 (95%CI: 0.759-0.855) (p<0.001) respectively. When comparing thoracic and lumbar screws, there was a significant difference in the sagittal angulation between the two distributions. No statistical differences were found distance from the reference frame.

CONCLUSION

The virtual projection view is clinically accurate compared to the actual placement on intra-operative CT in both the axial and sagittal views. There is slight imprecision (~2°) in the axial and sagittal planes and a minor difference in the sagittal thoracic and lumbar angulation, although these did not affect clinical outcomes. In general, we find that pedicle screw placement using intraoperative cone beam CT and navigation to be accurate and reliable, and as such have made it a routine part of our spine practice. This study was approved by the University of Minnesota IRB (#1303E30544).

Screw Placement Accuracy and Outcomes Following O-Arm-Navigated Atlantoaxial Fusion: A Feasibility Study

Study Design Case series of seven patients. Objective C2 stabilization can be challenging due to the complex anatomy of the upper cervical vertebrae. We describe seven cases of C1-C2 fusion using intraoperative navigation to aid in the screw placement at the atlantoaxial (C1-C2) junction. Methods Between 2011 and 2014, seven patients underwent posterior atlantoaxial fusion using intraoperative frameless stereotactic O-arm Surgical Imaging and StealthStation Surgical Navigation System (Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States). Outcome measures included screw accuracy, neurologic status, radiation dosing, and surgical complications. Results Four patients had fusion at C1-C2 only, and in the remaining three, fixation extended down to C3 due to anatomical considerations for screw placement recognized on intraoperative imaging. Out of 30 screws placed, all demonstrated minimal divergence from desired placement in either C1 lateral mass, C2 pedicle, or C3 lateral mass. No neurovascular compromise was seen following the use of intraoperative guided screw placement. The average radiation dosing due to intraoperative imaging was 39.0 mGy. All patients were followed for a minimum of 12 months. All patients went on to solid fusion. Conclusion C1-C2 fusion using computed tomography-guided navigation is a safe and effective way to treat atlantoaxial instability. Intraoperative neuronavigation allows for high accuracy of screw placement, limits complications by sparing injury to the critical structures in the upper cervical spine, and can help surgeons make intraoperative decisions regarding complex pathology.

Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery with Intraoperative Image-Guided Navigation

We present our perioperative minimally invasive spine surgery technique using intraoperative computed tomography image-guided navigation for the treatment of various lumbar spine pathologies. We present an illustrative case of a patient undergoing minimally invasive percutaneous posterior spinal fusion assisted by the O-arm system with navigation. We discuss the literature and the advantages of the technique over fluoroscopic imaging methods: lower occupational radiation exposure for operative room personnel, reduced need for postoperative imaging, and decreased revision rates. Most importantly, we demonstrate that use of intraoperative cone beam CT image-guided navigation has been reported to increase accuracy.

Osteotomies through a fusion mass in the lumbar spine

INTRODUCTION

Flat-back syndrome is one of the main causes of surgical failure after lumbar fusion and can lead to a revision surgery to correct it. Three-column pedicle subtraction osteotomy is an efficient technique to restore lumbar lordosis (LL) for fixed sagittal malalignment. The fusion mass stemming from the past surgeries makes the procedure demanding as most anatomical landmarks are missing.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This review article will focus on the correction of this lack of LL through the fusion mass. We will successively review the preoperative management, the surgical specificities, and various types of clinical cases that can be encountered in flat-back syndromes.

CONCLUSION

PSO in the fixed fusion mass is technically demanding. Preoperative CT-scan and preoperative navigation allow us to push the limits when anatomical landmarks disappear. Bleeding and neurologic are the two major complications feared by the surgeon. The best way to avoid these revision surgeries is to restore a proper lumbar lordosis at the time of initial surgery by considering lumbo-pelvic indexes.

Awareness of the median sacral artery during lumbosacral spinal surgery: an anatomic cadaveric study of its relationship to the lumbosacral spine

PURPOSE

The purpose was to investigate the median sacral artery (MSA) anatomical pathway in terms of its relationship to the lumbosacral spine.

METHODS

The posterior wall and lumbosacral spine of 54 adult embalmed cadavers were dissected. The MSA emerging point was identified. The distance from its emerging point to the lateral border of the vertebral body was measured bilaterally. The pathway of the MSA from the emerging point to the sacral promontory was described together with the MSA length. All outcomes were independently measured by two observers. Statistics on obtained data were calculated.

RESULTS

Most of the MSA emerging points were at the L5 vertebral body (94.4 %). The emerging point from the right and left lateral border of the L5 vertebral body was 3.31 ± 0.54 cm and 2.39 ± 0.51 cm, respectively. The MSA then lay along the middle one-third of the anterior surface of the lumbosacral junction. The mean length between the emerging point and the sacral promontory was 2.73 ± 0.97 cm.

CONCLUSIONS

The MSA anatomy is important for prevention of intra-operative bleeding. For anterior lumbosacral surgery, the MSA should be identified and controlled before proceeding with the spinal surgery. For posterior bicortical sacral screw placement, the screw tip should be fluoroscopically checked to avoid inserting the screw tip into the mid sacral promontory. By first approaching the anterior sacral promontory, the surgeon will find the MSA within the middle one-third zone, and 2.47-2.99 cm cephalad to this, the iliac vessels. Knowledge of the MSA helps the surgeon to operate more safely.