Marching beyond the sella: Gerard Guiot and his contributions to neurosurgery

Historiographies of surgical innovation: endoscopic endonasal pituitary surgery

The historiography of medicine has shifted from narratives of inevitable progress, authored mainly by the medical profession, to a more complex, analytical approach in which historians place medicine in its social context. However, the history of surgery has lagged behind somewhat; Christopher Lawrence suggests this is because the recent focus on the construction of medical knowledge does not incorporate the practical aspects of surgery, which are difficult to extract from their previous linear narrative. Thomas Schlich likewise recognises that surgery is both knowledge and skill-therefore more of a 'craft' than medicine. A possible solution is aligning the history of surgery with the history of technology: analysing the interplay of instruments and human activity.This case study uses the history of endoscopic endonasal pituitary surgery to explore the historiography of surgical innovation, in the context of its heavy reliance on both technology and interdisciplinary divisions of labour. Re-enactment, evolutionary frameworks and using Social Construction of Technology methods all require close collaboration between historian and surgeon to bridge the gap between scholarship and tacit knowledge.

Midline Skull Base Meningiomas: Transcranial and Endonasal Perspectives

Simple Summary

Skull base meningiomas have always represented a challenge for neurosurgeons. Despite their histological nature, they may be associated with unfavorable outcomes due to their deep-seated location and the surrounding neurovascular structures. Over time, several corridors have been proposed, each one carrying its own pros and cons. During the last decades, the endoscopic endonasal route has been asserted among the classic routes for a growing number of midline and paramedian lesions. Therefore, the aim of our paper is to present a comprehensive review of the indications and techniques for the management of skull base meningiomas, emphasizing the ambivalent and complementary role of the low and high routes.

Abstract

Skull base meningiomas have always represented a challenge for neurosurgeons. Despite their histological nature, they may be associated with unfavorable outcomes due to their deep-seated location and the surrounding neurovascular structures. The state of the art of skull base meningiomas accounts for both transcranial, or high, and endonasal, or low, routes. A comprehensive review of the pertinent literature was performed to address the surgical strategies and outcomes of skull base meningioma patients treated through a transcranial approach, an endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA), or both. Three databases (PubMed, Ovid Medline, and Ovid Embase) have been searched. The review of the literature provided 328 papers reporting the surgical, oncological, and clinical results of different approaches for the treatment of skull base meningiomas. The most suitable surgical corridors for olfactory groove, tuberculum sellae, clival and petroclival and cavernous sinus meningiomas have been analyzed. The EEA was proven to be associated with a lower extent of resection rates and better clinical outcomes compared with transcranial corridors, offering the possibility of achieving the so-called maximal safe resection.

Pituitary Surgery

Surgery, more specifically transsphenoidal approach, remains the primary treatment chosen for the majority of pituitary tumors (except for prolactinomas where medical treatment is indicated) allowing for pathologic analysis and complete or partial tumor removal. Transcranial approaches, employing craniotomies, are still needed in some patients with giant pituitary adenomas and in many of those harboring craniopharyngiomas. However, the surgical treatment of pituitary tumors is challenging because of their complex anatomical location and their heterogenous histology. Due to the proximity of critical structures, a successful surgical procedure may often not be achievable due to the high risks related to the procedure itself. Therefore, the treatment of pituitary tumors in 2020 commonly requires a multimodal approach, including surgery, radiosurgery, radiation therapy, and medical therapy. Recently, efforts have been made to develop intraoperative imaging, by increasing the diffusion of radiosurgery. Furthermore, the development of Pituitary Tumor Centers of Excellence (PTCOE) is becoming crucial to provide the optimal treatment for a single patient. There is in fact sufficient evidence that the best and optimal outcome in terms of tumor resection and correction of hormonal over secretion as well as the lowest rate of complications are obtained in centers of excellence with sufficiently experienced, specialized surgeons and a high patient load. Technological developments will probably even gain increasing importance in the future.